Abstract
Background
Epiphrenic diverticulum (ED) is a pulsion pseudodiverticulum found in the distal 10 cm of the esophagus. Motility disorders are present in the majority of patients with ED explaining the pathophysiology of this rare disease. Achalasia is the most common underlying disorder. We present a review on the diagnosis and management of ED in the setting of achalasia.
Methods
Literature review.
Results
Symptoms are most related to the underlying motility disorder. The diagnostic workup should always include an upper digestive endoscopy and a barium esophagogram. Esophageal manometry identifies the motility disorder in most patients. Therapeutic options include laparoscopic, thoracoscopic and endoscopic procedures. While a myotomy must always be performed, diverticulectomy is not always necessary.
Conclusions
Epiphrenic diverticulum is a rare condition whose pathophysiology involves an underlying motility disorder—achalasia in most cases. Symptoms usually include dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and respiratory complaints and correlate with the motility disorder rather than the diverticulum per se. Upper digestive endoscopy and barium esophagogram are needed for the diagnosis—manometry may add useful information but is not imperative for the treatment. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with a partial fundoplication is the procedure of choice, with satisfactory symptom relief and several advantages over the thoracic approach. Diverticulectomy may be performed in selected patients. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are novel techniques, effective and minimally invasive that can be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Esophageal diverticulum is a rare condition with an estimated prevalence around 0.02–3% [1] with higher rates in countries with an upper digestive cancer screening policy [2]. The esophagus may harbor diverticula in any portion of the organ. Mid-esophageal diverticula (Rokitansky diverticulum) are today more rare as they are typically associated with tuberculous mediastinal lymph nodes, although esophageal dysmotility has been found in most current cases [3]. Diverticula at the pharyngo-esophageal junction (Zenker’s diverticulum) or at the distal esophagus (epiphrenic diverticulum—ED) are pulsion pseudodiverticula. ED are located in the distal 10 cm of the esophagus and make up 10% of the esophageal diverticula [4].
Esophageal dysmotility is found in the majority of ED [5, 6]. Achalasia is the most frequent associated dysmotility [5, 7], and an ED can be found in 3–7% of patients with achalasia [8]
Clinical presentation
ED can be asymptomatic in 40–60% of the cases [9, 10]. Dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss, retrosternal pain, heartburn and respiratory complaints are the most common symptoms when present [2, 7, 11, 12]. Clearly these symptoms overlap with the symptoms present in achalasia (or other motility disorder) leading most authors to believe that symptoms are caused by the underlying motility disorder rather than the diverticulum per se, and do not correlate with its size [2, 9, 13].
Diagnosis
The diagnostic workup should always include an upper digestive endoscopy and a barium esophagogram [2, 10].
Upper digestive endoscopy can diagnose the diverticulum and may exclude associated diseases [9] (Fig. 1).
Barium esophagogram may define the number, size, location, and shape of diverticula. It may also identify rare complications such as fistulae [2, 12], and it can be helpful to identify the underlying motility disorder with findings suggestive of achalasia (bird’s beak sign, esophageal dilatation, contrast retention, and tertiary contractions) [9, 12].
Esophageal manometry may be added to the workup to precisely identify the underlying motor disorder. There are three reasons that might justify not performing a manometry: (1) dysmotility is present in probably all cases [5, 6]; (2) negotiating the lower esophageal sphincter may be difficult by blind intubation during manometry requiring placement guided by endoscopy; and (3) a cardiomyotomy must always be performed irrespective of the type of dysmotility, even when it is not detected such in some cases of diffuse esophageal spasm when the disorder is intermittent.
Ambulatory prolonged esophageal pH monitoring is not necessary since the association of ED and gastroesophageal reflux disease is rare and pseudoreflux may be detected due to food fermentation in the ED [2, 9].
Treatment
Asymptomatic diverticula
In the absence of symptoms in patients without prior history of aspiration and a non-dilated esophagus, ED may be left untreated. Studies that investigated the outcome of untreated diverticula did not find complications, worsening of pre-existing symptoms or change in size over time [14, 15]. Moreover, the burden of the risk of the operation is higher than the risk of complications [16]. The fear of malignant transformation does not justify treatment as the risk is neglectable [1].
Diverticula treatment
Diverticulectomy alone should never be performed. This approach does not take into account the ED pathophysiology that is caused by an underlying motility disorder. Moreover, the technique is associated with higher rate of symptoms persistence [16] and higher rate of leak due to elevated pressure in the esophageal lumen if a myotomy is not performed [2, 6, 7, 16].
Heller's myotomy and diverticulectomy is the classic surgical treatment for ED with achalasia [7]. This approach will treat achalasia and the ED. Classically it was performed through the chest. The advantage of a thoracic approach is an easier dissection of the upper part of the diverticulum, releasing strong adhesions and oversewing the staple line [16,17,18]. However, this route requires single lung ventilation, chest tube placement, and is difficult to add an anti-reflux procedure [13, 18,19,20]. The abdominal approach has several advantages such as a better access to the esophagogastric junction, easier performance of a fundoplication, and lower pulmonary morbidity [7, 13, 18]. Table 1 shows the results for minimally invasive procedures for ED treatment. Myotomy should extend proximally from the upper portion of the diverticular neck to 2 cm below the gastroesophageal junction distally [9, 13] (Fig. 2). Releasing the proximal aspect of the diverticulum from adhesions may be challenging, and placing a Penrose drain around the EGJ can allow good traction to facilitate the dissection [18]. When a diverticulectomy is chosen, the myotomy should be performed on the opposite side of the diverticulum in order to allow a suture line over the staple line, thus reducing the risk of a leak [9, 13, 18] (Fig. 3). A 50–56 F bougie should be placed before stapling the neck of the diverticulum to avoid luminal narrowing [18].
Treatment of achalasia only
As mentioned before, recent studies showed that an underlying motility disorder is responsible for most symptoms [6, 21]. This has led some authors to believe that a myotomy alone (without diverticulectomy) could yield satisfactory results [7, 13] and avoid the risk of a staple line leak. A leak occurs in 5–30% of patients, with an average morbidity of 20% and 4% mortality even in experienced hands [16]. In addition, smaller diverticula tend to vanish once a myotomy is performed, while the risk of malignant transformation is negligible [9, 16].
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) arose in the last decade and is now considered a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for achalasia [22]. This technique has been used as treatment for EP [23]. More ingeniously, endoscopists combined this technique with a septotomy in patients with achalasia and ED, named as D-POEM [24, 25]. As for laparoscopic myotomy, POEM alone can relieve symptoms like dysphagia and regurgitation without the need for resection the diverticulum [22, 23] (Table 2). The advantage of this procedure is particularly in spastic disorders such as type III achalasia or diffuse esophageal spasm which require a longer myotomy, safely performed through endoscopy [23]. The main drawback of this technique is the absence of an anti-reflux procedure, leading to gastroesophageal reflux in up to 46% of patients that underwent POEM [26].
Pseudodiverticulum at the myotomy site
Pseudodiverticulum may occur as an outpouching of the mucosa along the myotomy site (either endoscopic or surgical). This condition is rarely discussed although some authors point out a significant incidence between 20 and 70% [27, 28]. Curiously, it occurs even after an anterior fundoplication [28]. Some authors do not attribute symptoms to this finding [29], while other believe this is associated with treatment failure due to persistent obstruction at the esophagogastric junction [28, 30].
Conclusions
Epiphrenic diverticulum is a rare condition whose pathophysiology involves an underlying motility disorder—achalasia in most cases. Symptoms usually include dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and respiratory complaints and correlate with the motility disorder rather than the diverticulum per se. Upper digestive endoscopy and barium esophagogram are needed for the diagnosis—manometry may add useful information but is not imperative for the treatment. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with a partial fundoplication is the procedure of choice, with satisfactory symptom relief and several advantages over the thoracic approach. Diverticulectomy may be performed in selected patients. POEM and D-POEM are novel techniques, effective and minimally invasive that can be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
References
Herbella FA, Dubecz A, Patti MG (2012) Esophageal diverticula and cancer. Dis Esophagus. 25(2):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01226.x
Thomas ML, Anthony AA, Fosh BG et al (2001) Oesophageal diverticula. Br J Surg. 88(5):629–42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01733.x
Hoghooghi D, Coakley FV, Breiman RS et al (2006) Frequency and etiology of midesophageal diverticula at barium esophagography. Clin Imaging 30(4):245–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2006.02.002
Yoshida T, Hashimoto S, Mizuno KI et al (2020) Advanced squamous cell carcinoma in an asymptomatic, large, epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. Clin J Gastroenterol. 13(4):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-020-01098-4
Vicentine FP, Herbella FA, Silva LC et al (2011) High resolution manometry findings in patients with esophageal epiphrenic diverticula. Am Surg. 77(12):1661–4
Nehra D, Lord RV, DeMeester TR et al (2002) Physiologic basis for the treatment of epiphrenic diverticulum. Ann Surg. 235(3):346–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200203000-00006
Westcott CJ, O’Connor S, Preiss JE et al (2019) Myotomy-first approach to epiphrenic esophageal diverticula. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29(6):726–729. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0239
Herbella FA, Oliveira DR, Del Grande JC (2004) Are idiopathic and chagasic achalasia two different diseases? Dig Dis Sci. 49(3):353–60. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ddas.0000020486.71719.62
Herbella FA, Patti MG (2015) Achalasia and epiphrenic diverticulum. World J Surg. 39(7):1620–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2949-0
Fisichella PM, Jalilvand A, Dobrowolsky A (2015) Achalasia and epiphrenic diverticulum. World J Surg. 39(7):1614–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2950-7
Onwugbufor MT, Obirieze AC, Ortega G et al (2013) Surgical management of esophageal diverticulum: a review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. J Surg Res. 184(1):120–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.036
Tedesco P, Fisichella PM, Way LW et al (2005) Cause and treatment of epiphrenic diverticula. Am J Surg. 190(6):891–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.016
Allaix ME, Borraez Segura BA, Herbella FA et al (2015) Is resection of an esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum always necessary in the setting of achalasia? World J Surg. 39(1):203–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2770-1
Castrucci G, Porziella V, Granone PL et al (1998) Tailored surgery for esophageal body diverticula. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:380–387
Zaninotto G, Portale G, Costantini M et al (2008) Long-term outcome of operated and unoperated epiphrenic diverticula. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1485–1490
Zaninotto G, Portale G, Costantini M et al (2011) Therapeutic strategies for epiphrenic diverticula: systematic review. World J Surg. 35(7):1447–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1065-z
Soares R, Herbella FA, Prachand VN et al (2010) Epiphrenic diverticulum of the esophagus. From pathophysiology to treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 14(12):2009–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1216-9
Herbella FAM, Patti MG (2020) Minimizing complications after minimally invasive surgery for epiphrenic diverticula of the esophagus technical tips. Mini-Invasive Surg 4:82. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.84
Fraiji E Jr, Bloomston M, Carey L et al (2003) Laparoscopic management of symptomatic achalasia associated with epiphrenic diverticulum. Surg Endosc. 17(10):1600–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8959-7
Mandovra P, Kalikar V, Patel A et al (2019) The laparoscopic approach for epiphrenic diverticula with achalasia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 101(4):256–260. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2019.0007
Rice TW, Goldblum JR, Yearsley MM et al (2009) Myenteric plexus abnormalities associated with epiphrenic diverticula. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(1):22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.025 (discussion 27)
Demeter M, Ďuriček M, Vorčák M et al (2020) S-POEM in treatment of achalasia and esophageal epiphrenic divert. Scand J Gastroenterol 55(4):509–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2020.1745881
Kinoshita M, Tanaka S, Kawara F et al (2020) Peroral endoscopic myotomy alone is effective for esophageal motility disorders and esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum: a retrospective single-center study. Surg Endosc. 34(12):5447–5454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07340-6
Mandavdhare HS, Praveen Kumar M, Jha D et al (2021) Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Esophagus 18(3):436–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00839-9
Sato H, Takeuchi M, Hashimoto S et al (2019) Esophageal diverticulum: new perspectives in the era of minimally invasive endoscopic treatment. World J Gastroenterol 25(12):1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1457
Cappell MS, Stavropoulos SN, Friedel D (2020) Updated systematic review of achalasia, with a focus on POEM therapy. Dig Dis Sci 65(1):38–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05784-3
Chen LQ, Chughtai T, Sideris L et al (2002) Long-term effects of myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia. Dis Esophagus 15(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00248.x
Triggs JR, Krause AJ, Carlson DA et al (2021) Blown-out myotomy: an adverse event of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 93(4):861-868.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.041
Rubesin SE, Kennedy M, Levine MS et al (1988) Distal esophageal ballooning following Heller myotomy. Radiology 167:345–347
Tsoukali E, Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J et al (2011) Specific esophagogram to assess functional outcomes after Heller’s myotomy and Dor’s fundoplication for esophageal achalasia. Dis Esophagus 24(7):451–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01178.x
Rossetti G, Fei L, del Genio G et al (2013) Epiphrenic diverticula mini-invasive surgery: a challenge for expert surgeons–personal experience and review of the literature. Scand J Surg 102(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496913482242
Soares RV, Montenovo M, Pellegrini CA et al (2011) Laparoscopy as the initial approach for epiphrenic diverticula. Surg Endosc 25(12):3740–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1779-x
Caso R, Chang H, Marshall MB (2019) Evolving options in management of minimally invasive diverticular disease: a single surgeon’s experience and review of the literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 29(6):780–784. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0711
Hauge T, Johnson E, Sandstad O et al (2014) Surgical treatment of epiphrenic oesophageal diverticulum. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 134(10):1047–50. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.13.1336
Gonzalez-Calatayud M, Targarona EM, Balague C et al (2014) Minimally invasive therapy for epiphrenic diverticula: systematic review of literature and report of six cases. J Minim Access Surg 10(4):169–74. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.141498
Andrási L, Paszt A, Simonka Z et al (2018) Laparoscopic surgery for epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. JSLS 22(2):e2017-00093. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2017.00093
Rosati R, Fumagalli U, Bona S et al (1998) Diverticulectomy, myotomy, and fundoplication through laparoscopy: a new option to treat epiphrenic esophageal diverticula? Ann Surg 227(2):174–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199802000-00004
van der Peet DL, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Berends FJ et al (2001) Epiphrenic diverticula: minimal invasive approach and repair in five patients. Dis Esophagus 14(1):60–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2001.00151.x
Rosati R, Fumagalli U, Bona S et al (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of epiphrenic diverticula. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11(6):371–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/10926420152761897
Neoral C, Aujeský R, Bohanes T et al (2002) Laparoscopic transhiatal resection of epiphrenic diverticulum. Dis Esophagus 15(4):323–325. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2050.2002.00275.x
Matthews BD, Nelms CD, Lohr CE et al (2003) Minimally invasive management of epiphrenic esophageal diverticula. Am Surg 69(6):465–70 (discussion 470)
Klaus A, Hinder RA, Swain J et al (2003) Management of epiphrenic diverticula. J Gastrointest Surg 7(7):906–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-003-0038-4
Del Genio A, Rossetti G, Maffetton V et al (2004) Laparoscopic approach in the treatment of epiphrenic diverticula: long-term results. Surg Endosc. 18(5):741–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9044-6
Fernando HC, Luketich JD, Samphire J et al (2005) Minimally invasive operation for esophageal diverticula. Ann Thorac Surg 80(6):2076–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.007
Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, John SJ et al (2008) Laparoscopic transhiatal approach for benign supra-diaphragmatic lesions of the esophagus: a replacement for thoracoscopy? Dis Esophagus 21(2):176–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00739.x
Yu L, Wu JX, Chen XH et al (2016) Laparoscopic diverticulectomy with the aid of intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy to treat epiphrenic diverticulum. J Minim Access Surg 12(4):366–369. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181391.PMID:27251833;PMCID:PMC5022520
Orlandini B, Barret M, Guillaumot MA et al (2020) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal diverticula with or without esophageal motility disorders. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 44(1):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2019.03.013
Li X, Zhang W, Yang J et al (2019) Safety and efficacy of submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division for epiphrenic diverticula. Endoscopy 51(12):1141–1145. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1024-5879
Basile P, Gonzalez JM, Le Mouel JP et al (2020) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with septotomy for the treatment of distal esophageal diverticula (D-POEM). Surg Endosc 34(5):2321–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07354-0
Funding
There is no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nadaleto, B.F., Herbella, F.A.M. & Patti, M.G. Treatment of Achalasia and Epiphrenic Diverticulum. World J Surg 46, 1547–1553 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06476-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06476-2