Abstract
Background
Meniscus root tears represent significant pathology that, historically, has been underdiagnosed and undertreated. However, the recognition of their clinical and functional significance has recently surged, mainly due to their frequent association with anterior cruciate ligament injuries.
Aim
This comprehensive review discusses various aspects of meniscal root tears, including their epidemiology, biomechanics, etiology, clinical and radiological findings, classification, management and surgical techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Meniscus root tears (MRTs) are characterized by radial tears within 1 cm of either the anterior or posterior meniscotibial attachment or by a complete avulsion of the meniscus from its tibial attachment [1, 2]. Historically, these injuries have been underdiagnosed and underappreciated, but they have gained substantial attention over recent years, primarily due to their frequent association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries [3,4,5]. The first recorded meniscal root avulsion injury dates back to 1935 when Weaver, utilizing plain radiographs, described it as an ossification of the internal semilunar cartilage [6]. Subsequently, with the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the early 1990s, Pagnani reported a case of medial meniscus subluxation associated with an avulsion injury to the posterior horn root attachment [7]. The modern definition of “meniscus root tear” was only introduced about a decade ago by Wolf Petersen and Robert Laprade [1, 5].
Epidemiology
Meniscal root tears account for about 20% of all meniscal tears, representing a significant component within the spectrum of meniscus pathologies [3, 8]. Degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tears represent the most commonly reported subtype among meniscus tears. It is noteworthy that around 80% of all medial meniscus root tears were found in individuals who were obese with a sedentary lifestyle and those who were older than 50 years of age [1, 8]. Despite the contribution of these injuries to degenerative joint disease, they are often undiagnosed at initial presentation [2, 9].
Recent studies showed that the incidence of medial MRTs can be substantially higher in certain populations with distinctive lifestyles that entail frequent squatting, kneeling and sitting on the floor with folded legs [5]. On the other hand, lateral MRTs have been reported in 18% of chronic ACL-deficient knees and 12% of acute ACL injuries [2, 9]. With the recent growing interest in MRTs, it is plausible that the actual prevalence of these injuries is even higher than what is currently reported in the literature [1].
Biomechanics
The menisci have a crucial role in knee function and biomechanics. They serve as shock absorbers by distributing the forces and converting the axial loads into radial tangential stresses, commonly referred to as hoop stresses [1, 2, 4]. Anchoring the meniscus to the tibia plateau and preventing meniscal extrusion during joint loading mitigate the impact of the compressive forces, consequently protecting the knee from potential osteoarthritic changes [10,11,12,13].
Several biomechanical studies have shown that meniscus root injuries are equivalent to total meniscectomy [12, 14]. These pathological alterations within the knee subsequent to a root tear are responsible for the gradual damage of the articular cartilage, leading to arthritis of the knee joint [15, 16].
In addition to their chondroprotective role, the menisci serve as secondary stabilizers of the knee joint [12, 17, 18]. Multiple factors, including the gross anatomy and histological composition of the meniscus, influence this stability. The orientation of fibers, along with the concavity of the superior surface, contributes to improved joint congruity, heightened load tolerance and multidirectional stability [19]. Additionally, several studies demonstrated the pivotal significance of the lateral meniscus posterior root in stabilizing the knee during both anterior tibial translation and pivoting activities [18, 20].
Aetiology and mechanism of injury
Posterior roots of the menisci are more commonly affected than the anterior ones, which can be iatrogenically injured during ACL tibial tunnel drilling and intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures [20,21,22]. Medial MRTs have been commonly, but not only reported in older patients, females, obese patients with a sedentary lifestyle. These tears are closely correlated with age-related degenerative changes and low-energy repetitive trauma such as deep squatting, high knee flexion postures and descending knee motion [18, 20, 23]. In contrast, lateral MRTs are often found in young male patients with acute ACL or multiple ligamentous knee injuries [1, 3, 4, 20] (Table 1). Studies have a significantly higher concomitance between ACL injuries and lateral MRTs compared to medial MRTs, with the risk being elevated tenfold [24].
Clinical features
Diagnosing MRTs can be a complex and challenging task due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of the associated signs and symptoms [1, 2]. Hence, it is imperative to stress on the importance of comprehensive history taking, meticulous physical examination and appropriate imaging techniques to ensure timely and accurate diagnosis.
Clinical presentation
Root tears are not confined to acute knee trauma and are often correlated with a chronic degenerative process. Hence, it is imperative to maintain a high degree of suspicion when assessing patients who exhibit risk factors such as advanced age, increased activity level, sedentary lifestyle and specific injury mechanisms [1, 9].
Older patients with MRTs tend to present with chronic and subtle symptoms frequently associated with repetitive low-energy mechanisms, such as deep squatting and kneeling on the floor [1, 20]. In contrast, among younger patients, such injuries often result from a rotatory blow to a flexed knee or as part of a multi-ligamentous knee injury [20].
Patients typically present with posterior knee pain and restricted range of motion, particularly during flexion. Additionally, patients might describe mechanical symptoms, such as locking and clicking or episodes of instability [3, 4].
Physical examination
During physical examination, patients frequently exhibit tenderness along the joint line and decreased flexion angle [25]. In cases of medial meniscus posterior root tears, an extruded meniscus can be palpated. This can be provoked by applying a varus stress force while the knee is in full extension [26]. Additionally, McMurray and Thessaly tests might be positive. Given the potential concomitance with other knee injuries, it is imperative to always conduct a comprehensive knee examination, especially with high-grade pivot shift and anterior drawer tests [8, 27].
Radiological findings
The growing interest and recognition of the clinical impact of MRTs have increased the rate of their radiographic diagnosis and detection [1]. Plain X-rays, including anteroposterior, lateral, weight-bearing 45° posteroanterior and Merchant views, are typically requested to assess and rule out bony abnormalities. Additionally, cone-bean weight-bearing CT can be used to assess for meniscus extrusion [28]. However, MRI is the imaging modality of choice to diagnose meniscal root tears and concomitant pathologies [20, 29]. MRI has higher sensitivity but less specificity in detecting medial meniscus posterior root tears as compared to lateral meniscus root tears [29]. This discrepancy in sensitivity can be attributed to the anterior oblique course of the lateral meniscus posterior root attachment and its proximity to other structures [1, 29, 30].
The quality of the MRI and the skill level of the radiologist may affect the ability to detect meniscus root tears on MRI. Nevertheless, diagnosis can be guided by the direct and indirect signs of meniscus root tears, which are listed in Table 2.
The direct signs of meniscal root tears on MRI include (1) high signal in the region of the meniscus root and posterior horn on axial images (Fig. 1A), (2) “Cleft” sign, representing a vertical linear tear on the meniscal root on coronal T2 MRI (Fig. 1B), and (3) “Ghost” sign, representing the absence of a normal meniscal signal on sagittal T2 MRI (Figure 1C). Indirect signs include parameniscal cysts, subchondral bone marrow edema and meniscal extrusion >3 mm (Fig. 1D) [23, 29, 31].
Despite the high sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosing MRTs, it is essential to acknowledge that some of these tears may remain undetected until an arthroscopic procedure is performed. Hence, arthroscopic visualization remains the gold standard for diagnosing meniscal root tears [20, 32,33,34].
Classification
Several classification systems have been proposed to describe and guide the management of MRTs. However, Laprade’s classification is considered the most commonly used one [34]. Laprade classified MRTs based on their morphology during arthroscopic assessment. The classification encompasses five distinct lesions: type 1 tears representing partial root tears that are stable (7% of all meniscus root tears). Type 2 tears representing complete radial tears within 9 mm of root attachment center (67.6%). This type was subclassified into three subtypes according to the distance of the tear from the center of the root attachment (2A 0–3 mm, 2B 3–6 mm and 2C 6–9 mm). Type 3 tear was defined as bucket-handle tear with complete root detachment (5.6%). Type 4 tears are complex oblique tears with complete root detachment (10%) and bony avulsion of the root attachment (9.9%) [34]. Figures 2 and 3 demonstrate a cadaveric photograph of the knee showing the medical meniscus and Laprade’s arthroscopic classification of meniscal root tears, respectively.
Treatment algorithm
The management of MRTs depends on several factors, including injury severity, time of injury and articular cartilage status [12, 33]. Given the crucial role of the menisci in articular cartilage preservation, saving the meniscus should always be a priority. Meniscal root tears have three main treatment options: conservative treatment, partial meniscectomy and surgical repair [32, 33].
Non-operative management is indicated in certain situations including cases of advanced articular cartilage damage and for older or obese patients who are not medically fit for surgery [18, 20, 32]. This approach typically includes symptomatic treatment with pain medications, physical therapy, lifestyle modification and an unloader brace [20, 32].
The mainstay of MRTs treatment is surgical repair with the primary objective of restoring knee kinematics by preserving the meniscal function in order to delay the onset of osteoarthritis [35]. However, advanced osteoarthritis, focal chondral injury, severe coronal and sagittal malalignment and knee instability are all considered contraindications to meniscal root repair [9, 20, 30, 31]. Therefore, addressing these pathologies is imperative before considering surgical repair. For patients with persistent mechanical symptoms despite non-operative measures, partial meniscectomy may be indicated if repair is deemed unfeasible. While partial meniscectomy offers short-term relief, it is crucial to acknowledge that the long-term consequence invariably involves the development of further osteoarthritis [15]. Figure 4 illustrates the treatment algorithm for MRTs.
Surgical technique
Arthroscopic posterior meniscus root repair
Given the essential role of the meniscus root in the proper function of the meniscus, immediate surgical intervention is strongly recommended for root injuries in young and active patients with minimal articular cartilage injury [36, 37]. Several fixation techniques have been described in the literature, yet the two main techniques used to fix the posterior root of the meniscus are suture anchor and transtibial pullout techniques. The transtibial pullout repair technique is considered the gold standard method as it provides a more anatomical reduction, which is crucial to restore meniscus stability and knee kinematics [18, 20, 37,38,39].
The transtibial pullout repair consists of drilling a tunnel, steered by the meniscal root guide, through the anterior aspect of the ipsilateral proximal tibia, extending to the anatomic root insertion site. Luggage tag or looped sutures are passed through the meniscal root under arthroscopic visualization. Subsequently, these meniscal sutures are retrieved through the tunnel and firmly secured over a cortical fixation device such as a button or an anchor [20, 30] (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6).
Centralization
To enhance meniscus root repair, centralization of the extruded meniscus can be employed, as extrusion commonly arises as a complication of meniscus root repair. Meniscus centralization is performed by reducing and fixing the extruded meniscus to the articular surface of the tibia at the meniscocapsular junction (Fig. 7).
Suture anchor
The suture anchor technique is typically performed via a posteromedial or lateral portal, with the occasional use of an accessory posterior portal for suture passing. Ensuring optimal outcomes necessitates adequate visualization and careful consideration of the trajectory of the native posterior root attachment.
Post-operative rehabilitation
The existing evidence regarding rehabilitation after MRTs repairs is primarily derived from cadaveric and animal studies, as comparative studies between different protocols are lacking [24]. However, most rehabilitation protocols in the literature follow four common stages [37, 40].
Phase 1 (0–6 weeks) consists of protecting the repair, resolving joint inflammation, swelling and regaining leg control. During this phase, the patient is maintained non-weight bearing for at least six weeks with a hinged knee brace locked in extension. Scheduled passive range of motion (ROM) exercises are arranged with a physiotherapist, and the range of motion restricted is to 0–90° of flexion to avoid deep flexion as it is associated with increased peak contact pressure and posterior extrusion forces on the meniscus.
The second phase (6–12 weeks) focuses on gaining full weight bearing, better leg control and normal gait without crutches. At the beginning of this phase (6–8 weeks), passive ROM is maintained up to 90° and active ROM is gradually initiated but limited to 0–60° of flexion. Weight-bearing knee flexion is introduced after the patient has regained normal controlled gait and is limited to 45° of flexion. Passive ROM can be increased gradually beyond 90° at eight weeks. At the end of this stage, the patient should be able to perform daily live activities without a brace or crutches comfortably.
The third phase (12–18 weeks) consists of maintaining ROM, proprioception and strengthening. During this phase, the patient is introduced to sports and work-specific activities. Care should be taken to avoid significant swelling after exercising. Weightbearing high flexion or deep squats above 70° are prohibited at this stage.
The last phase (above 21 weeks) focuses mostly on sport/activity-related exercises in preparation for a return to sport for athletes, strengthening and full body fitness including cardiovascular exercises. Care should be taken to avoid severe pain during the exercises and significant swelling following the exercises.
Prognosis
Although meniscal root repair aims to restore the meniscus root anatomy, biomechanical studies have demonstrated that such repairs only partially reinstate the knee’s native kinematics. Consequently, despite the advancements in root repairs, they fall short of completely preventing the progression of knee osteoarthritis [15, 41]. However, patients who underwent anatomic meniscal root repair have demonstrated significant improvement with regard to pain, function and level of activity [42]. Furthermore, these repairs have been correlated with a slower progression of osteoarthritis [42].
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF (2014) Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment: significance, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med 42(12):3016–3030
Cinque ME, Chahla J, Moatshe G, Faucett SC, Krych AJ, LaPrade RF (2018) Meniscal root tears: a silent epidemic. Br J Sports Med 52(13):872–876
Kennedy MI, Strauss M, Laprade RF (2020) Injury of the meniscus root. Clin Sports Med 39(1):57–68
Papalia R, Vasta S, Franceschi F, D’Adamio S, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2013) Meniscal root tears: from basic science to ultimate surgery. Br Med Bull 106(1):91–115
Petersen W, Forkel P, Feucht MJ, Zantop T, Imhoff AB, Brucker PU (2014) Posterior root tear of the medial and lateral meniscus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 34(2):237–255
Weaver JB (1935) (1935) Ossification of the internal semilunar cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 17:195–198
Pagnani MJ, Cooper DE, Warren RF (1991) Extrusion of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 7(3):297–300
Itthipanichpong T, Moonwong S (2022) Medial meniscus root tear: current update review. In: Suarez-Ahedo C (ed) Arthroscopy. London, England, IntechOpen
Krych AJ, Hevesi M, Leland DP, Stuart MJ (2020) Meniscal root injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 28(12):491–499
Padalecki JR, Jansson KS, Smith SD, Dornan GJ, Pierce CM, Wijdicks CA et al (2014) Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in situ pull-out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics: in situ pull-out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics. Am J Sports Med 42(3):699–707
LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, Rasmussen MT, James EW, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L et al (2014) Anatomy of the anterior root attachments of the medial and lateral menisci: a quantitative analysis: a quantitative analysis. Am J Sports Med 42(10):2386–2392
Banovetz MT, Roethke LC, Rodriguez AN, LaPrade RF (2022) Meniscal root tears: a decade of research on their relevant anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. Arch Bone Jt Surg 10(5):366–380
Floyd ER, Rodriguez AN, Falaas KL, Carlson GB, Chahla J, Geeslin AG et al (2021) The natural history of medial meniscal root tears: a biomechanical and clinical case perspective. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:744065
Espejo-Reina A, Prado-Novoa M, Espejo-Baena A, Peña-Trabalon A, Perez-Blanca A (2022) Biomechanical consequences of anterior root detachment of the lateral meniscus and its reinsertion. Sci Rep 12(1):6182
Guermazi A, Hayashi D, Jarraya M, Roemer FW, Zhang Y, Niu J et al (2013) Medial posterior meniscal root tears are associated with development or worsening of medial tibiofemoral cartilage damage: the multicenter osteoarthritis study. Radiology 1 268(3):814–821
Berthiaume M-J, Raynauld J-P, Martel-Pelletier J, Labonté F, Beaudoin G, Bloch DA et al (2005) Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 64(4):556–563
Zusmanovich M (2013) (2021) Meniscal root tears: a comprehensive review. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 79(1):58–62
Pache S, Aman ZS, Kennedy M, Nakama GY, Moatshe G, Ziegler C et al (2018) Meniscal root tears: current concepts review. Arch Bone Jt Surg 6(4):250–259
Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo SA (2021) The basic science of human knee menisci: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 4(4):340–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738111429419
LaPrade RF, Floyd ER, Carlson GB, Moatshe G, Chahla J, Monson JK (2021) Meniscal root tears: solving the silent epidemic. J Arthroscopic Surg Sports Med 2(47):47–57
LaPrade CM, Smith SD, Rasmussen MT, Hamming MG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L et al (2015) Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, part 1: the anterior cruciate ligament: the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 43(1):200–206
Espejo-Reina A, Prado-Novoa M, Espejo-Baena A, Estebanez B, Perez-Blanca A (2023) Improved tibiofemoral contact restoration after transtibial reinsertion of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus compared to in situ repair: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 47(10):2419–2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05769-y
Kamatsuki Y, Furumatsu T, Hiranaka T, Okazaki Y, Kintaka K, Kodama Y, Miyazawa S, Ozaki T (2023) Epidemiological features of acute medial meniscus posterior root tears. Int Orthop 47(10):2537–2545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05848-0
Merin Fermin T, Hantouly AT, Epameinontidis K, Papakostas E (2022) Rehabilitation after meniscal root repair: current concepts. ISAKOS Newsletter 2022 Volume 1: Current Concepts of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. https://www.isakos.com/GlobalLink/Newsletter/2022-Volume-1/Rehabilitation-AfterMeniscal-Root-Repair
Guimarães JB, Chemin RN, Araujo FF, Link TM, Silva FD, Bitar A et al (2022) Meniscal root tears: an update focused on preoperative and postoperative MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 219(2):269–278
Seil R, Dück K, Pape D (2011) A clinical sign to detect root avulsions of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2072–2075
Konan S, Rayan F, Haddad FS (2009) Do physical diagnostic tests accurately detect meniscal tears? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(7):806–811
Thawait GK, Demehri S, AlMuhit A, Zbijweski W, Yorkston J, Del Grande F, Zikria B, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH (2015) Extremity cone-beam CT for evaluation of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: initial experience in imaging of the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee. Eur J Radiol 84(12):2564–2570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.09.003
LaPrade RF, Ho CP, James E, Crespo B, LaPrade CM, Matheny LM (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of meniscus posterior root pathology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):152–157
LaPrade RF, LaPrade CM, James EW (2015) Recent advances in posterior meniscal root repair techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23(2):71–76
Palisch AR, Winters RR, Willis MH, Bray CD, Shybut TB (2016) Posterior root meniscal tears: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative imaging for transtibial pullout repair. Radiographics 36(6):1792–1806
Koenig JH, Ranawat AS, Umans HR, Difelice GS (2009) Meniscal root tears: diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy 25(9):1025–1032
Doherty DB, Lowe WR (2016) Meniscal root tears: identification and repair. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 45(3):183–187
LaPrade CM, James EW, Cram TR, Feagin JA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2015) Meniscal root tears: a classification system based on tear morphology. Am J Sports Med 43(2):363–369
Kawada K, Furumatsu T, Tamura M, Xue H, Higashihara N, Kintaka K, Yokoyama Y, Ozaki T (2023) Medial joint space narrowing progresses after pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear. Int Orthop 47(10):2401–2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05701-4
Vyas D, Harner CD (2012) Meniscus root repair. Sports Med Arthrosc 20(2):86–94
Faucett SC, Geisler BP, Chahla J, Krych AJ, Kurzweil PR, Garner AM et al (2019) Meniscus root repair vs meniscectomy or nonoperative management to prevent knee osteoarthritis after medial meniscus root tears: clinical and economic effectiveness. Am J Sports Med 47(3):762–769
Pangaud C, Rarchaert M, Belgaid V, Ollivier M, Fessy M-H, Viste A (2022) An anatomical study of the meniscal roots of the knee: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction and implications for knee surgeons. Surg Radiol Anat 44(7):971–977
Xue H, Furumatsu T, Hiranaka T, Kintaka K, Higashihara N, Tamura M, Zhang X, Ozaki T (2023) Concomitant posterior anchoring further reduces posterior meniscal extrusion during pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: a retrospective study. Int Orthop 47(10):2391–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05660-2.MuellerBT
Moulton SG, O’Brien L, LaPrade RF (2016) Rehabilitation following meniscal root repair: a clinical commentary. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 46(2):104–113
Chung KS, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Kim JG (2016) Prognostic factors in the midterm results of pullout fixation for posterior root tears of the medial meniscus. Arthroscopy 32(7):1319–1327
Eseonu KC, Neale J, Lyons A, Kluzek S (2022) Are outcomes of acute meniscus root tear repair better than debridement or nonoperative management? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 50(11):3130–3139. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211031250
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
No applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hantouly, A.T., Aminake, G., Khan, A.S. et al. Meniscus root tears: state of the art. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 48, 955–964 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06092-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06092-w