Abstract
Purpose
Widely used in traumatic pelvic ring fractures, the iliosacral (IS) screw technique for spino-pelvic fixation remains anecdotal in adult spinal deformity. The objective of this study was to assess anatomical variability of the adult upper sacrum and to provide a user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws in adult spinal deformity.
Methods
Anatomical variability of the upper sacrum according to age, gender, height and weight was sought on 30 consecutive pelvic CT-scans. Thus, a user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws was modeled and assessed on ten CT-scans as described below. Two invariable landmarks usable during the surgical procedure were defined: point A (corresponding to the connector binding the IS screw to the spinal rod), equidistant from the first posterior sacral hole and the base of the S1 articular facet and 10 mm-embedded into the sacrum; point B (corresponding to the tip of the IS screw) located at the junction of the anterior third and middle third of the sacral endplate in the sagittal plane and at the middle of the endplate in the coronal plane. Point C corresponded to the intersection between the A-B direction and the external facet of the iliac wing. Three-dimensional reconstructions modeling the IS screw optimal direction according to the A-B-C straight line were assessed.
Results
Age had no effect on the anatomy of the upper sacrum. The distance between the base of the S1 superior articular facet and the top of the first posterior sacral hole was correlated with weight (r = 0.6; 95% CI [0.6–0.9]); p < 0.001). Sacral end-plate thickness increased for male patients (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with height (r = 0.6; 95% CI [0.29–0.75]); p < 0.001) and weight (r = 0.8; 95% CI [0.6–0.9]); p < 0.001). The thickness of the inferior part of the S1 vertebral body increased in male patients (p < 0.001). Other measured parameters slightly varied according to gender, height and weight. Simulating the described technique of pelvic fixation, no misplaced IS screw was found whatever the age, gender and morphologic parameters.
Conclusion
This user guide of spinopelvic fixation with IS screws seems to be reliable and reproducible independently of age, gender and morphologic characteristics but needs clinical assessment.
Level of evidence: Level IV
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In regards to adult spinal deformity, pelvic fixation remains a challenging procedure potentially increasing surgical morbidity [1, 2]. Numerous types of pelvic fixation were successively developed but none has demonstrated superiority over other methods [3, 4].
Iliosacral (IS) screw placement was initially used in traumatology to reduce and stabilize vertical IS disruptions [5,6,7]. The interest of IS screw fixation is nowadays well established as it can be percutaneously performed with a small implant biomechanically equal or superior to other techniques of internal fixation [8,9,10,11]. Dubousset et al. [12] developed a type of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws to correct pelvic obliquity in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. This device combines an IS screw bound to the rod of a posterior spinal instrumentation by a polyaxial connector (Fig. 1) [13].
Nevertheless, the use of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws in adult spinal deformity remains anecdotal [3, 14]. No study has clearly established a reliable method to place IS screws in this case. Unlike what is commonly performed for traumatic pelvic ring fractures, fluoroscopically guided surgery using inlet and outlet views is not applicable for spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws. Besides, computer-assisted surgery, although safe, is not yet widespread and few surgical centres are equipped.
To this date, only two authors reported clinical and radiographic outcomes following pelvic fixation using IS screws: spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws in adult spinal deformity showed favourable results in their studies [3, 14]. This type of spino-pelvic fixation was transposed from paediatric surgery to adult surgery but the anatomical landmarks between a paediatric neuromuscular pelvic ring and a normal adult pelvic ring are supposedly different [15,16,17]. The main risk is to generate a conflict with the S1 roots in their sacral foramina [18, 19].
Numerous authors have already assessed the anatomy of the upper sacral bones: sacral pedicles, S1 foramina and sacral bone density were the most studied items [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. However, few authors have sought variations of the upper sacral anatomy according to gender [29, 30] and none according to patient morphologic characteristics. The study was conducted using data collected from CT-scans [31] and had three goals:
-
1.
To analyze the anatomy of the upper sacrum in an adult population region of interest because the IS screw extends through the S1 vertebra body.
-
2.
To establish an user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws in adults (Fig. 1 C)
-
3.
To seek an effect of age, gender, weight and height on the anatomy of the upper sacrum and the IS screw placement.
Materials and methods
Population setting
Forty consecutive pelvic CT-scans were included: 30 for the analysis of the upper sacral anatomy and ten to assess a user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws. Patients under 18 years old or presenting a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, a history of sacral or pelvic ring fracture, an L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis, an L5-S1 anterior or posterior fusion and a malformation of the lumbosacral hinge were excluded. All measures were performed using CT-scan data on AW volume Shore 5 software (General Electric, Fairfield, Connecticut) and Carestream Vue PACS software (CarestreamHealth, Rochester, New York). Patients were installed in the supine position during the CT-scan acquisition. All measurements were bilateral and independently achieved on each pelvic CT-scan. Regarding lumbosacral disc degeneration, anterior and posterior osteophytes were not considered.
Anatomical study of the S1 sacral foramina
Before exiting from the first sacral hole, the S1 root passes through the S1 lateral recess and subsequently through the S1 foramen. The S1 root courses inferior to the S1 pedicle and anterior to the S1 vertebral body. In consequence, an IS screw with an ectopic direction may injure the S1 root.
The S1 lateral recess and S1 foramina were separately studied. Regarding the S1 lateral recess, the S1 lateral recess inlet area was measured in the plane of the sacral endplate and the S1 lateral recess outlet area and height were measured in the sagittal plane (Fig. 2). Regarding the S1 foramina, the areas of the anterior and posterior first sacral holes on CT-scan slides respectively tangent to the anterior and posterior sacral aspects were measured. On transverse slides perpendicular to the posterior aspect of the sacrum, the distance between the first posterior and anterior sacral holes corresponding to the sacral thickness was measured. On tridimensional reconstructions, in the plane tangent to the posterior sacral aspect, the distance between the base of the S1 superior articular facet and the top of the posterior first sacral hole was also evaluated (Fig. 3). To assess the S1 vertebral body, the sacral endplate thickness and the thickness of the inferior part of the S1 vertebral body were measured in the sagittal plane. The orientation of the S1 foramina in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes was also studied (Fig. 4).
Description of the user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws
Two invariable landmarks were defined. The first point (point A) was in the sagittal plane at equidistance from the first posterior sacral hole and the base of the S1 superior articular facet; in the transverse plane, it was placed 10 mm perpendicular and anterior to the posterior aspect of the sacrum. Point B was located at the junction of the anterior third and middle third of the S1 vertebral body right under the sacral endplate in the sagittal plane and at the middle of the endplate in the coronal plane. During the surgical procedure, following the exposure of the posterior aspect of the sacrum, the operator places the connector using a holder linking the IS screw with the rod of the spinal instrumentation. Point A corresponds to the position of the connector. The ancillary contains a targeting device attached to the connector holder for the insertion of a wire corresponding to the direction of the IS screw. The wire position is controlled by fluoroscopy to place the tip of the wire at the previously described point B (Fig. 1D). Points A and B allowed the operator to model the final direction of the IS screw (ABC straight line) and deduce the location of the third point (point C) (Fig. 5). Point C corresponded to the intersection between the A-B direction and the external cortex of the iliac wing. Point C always has to be located 1 cm under the iliac crest so that the head of the IS screw holds in the iliac wing and avoids being protruding under the skin. From this A-B-C straight line, modeling the placement of the IS screw, the direction in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes was measured (Fig. 6 ).
Statistical analysis
Continuous data were described with mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). The effect of gender on the anatomy of the S1 sacral foramina and the placement of IS screw was processed using Student’s t-test. The effect of age, height and weight was processed using a non-parametric Spearman correlation analysis. Post hoc power analysis has been evaluated for each parameter.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were recorded in Excel® 2008 (Microsoft, Richmond, WA). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® Advanced Statistics 20.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results
Anatomical study of the S1 foramina and S1 vertebral body (Tables 1 and 2)
The mean age was 53.1 years (95% CI [44.9–61.8]), 55.3 years (95% CI [47.8–62.1]) for female patients and 50.9 years (95% CI [42.2–59.3]) for male patients, respectively. The population was equally composed of 15 male patients and 15 female patients. Regarding the anatomical study of the S1 sacral hole, the S1 lateral recess inlet and S1 lateral recess outlet mean areas were, respectively, 25.4 mm2 (95% CI [22.9–28.2]) and 193.2 mm2 (95% CI [182.6–203.2]). The average S1 lateral recess height was 29 mm (95% CI [28–29.9]). The mean areas of the anterior and posterior first sacral holes were, respectively, 169.2 mm2 (95% CI [157.2–180.2]) and 98.7 mm2 (95% CI [89.6–107.4]). The mean distance between the anterior and posterior first sacral holes was 27.6 mm (95% CI [26.6–28.4]). The mean distance between the base of the S1 superior articular facet and the top of the first posterior sacral hole was 10.7 mm (95% CI [9.9–11.5]). Regarding the S1 vertebral body measurements, the sacral end plate and the inferior part of S1 vertebral body thicknesses were, respectively, 27 mm (95% CI [26.1–27.9]) and 18.1 mm (95% CI [17.3–18.9]). The S1 foramina were oriented 48° (95% CI [45.4–50.4]) anteriorly and outwardly in the transverse plane, 55.7° (95% CI [54.4–57.1]) anteriorly and downwardly in the sagittal plane, and 38.6° (95% CI [36–41.1]) downwardly and outwardly in the coronal plane.
Age had no effect on the anatomy of the upper sacrum. The S1 lateral recess outlet area slightly increased for male patients (p = 0.04) and was slightly correlated with height (r = 0.5; 95% CI [0.13–0.68]); p = 0.03). The area of the posterior first sacral holes was slightly correlated with height (r = 0.4; 95% CI [0.09–0.6]); p = 0.01). The first sacral hole’s anteroposterior distance increased in male patients (p = 0.001) and was slightly correlated with height (r = 0.4; 95% CI [0.18–0.6]); p = 0.007). The distance between the base of the S1 superior articular facet and the top of the posterior first sacral hole was slightly correlated with height (r = 0.3; 95% CI [0.29–0.75]); p < 0.001) and correlated with weight (r = 0.6; 95% CI [0.6–0.9]); p < 0.001). Sacral end-plate thickness increased in male patients (p < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with height (r = 0.6; 95% CI [0.29–0.75]; p < 0.001) and weight (r = 0.8; 95% CI [0.6–0.9]; p < 0.001). The inferior part of the S1 vertebral body thickness increased in male patients (p < 0.001) and was slightly correlated with height (r = 0.4; 95% CI [0.14–0.63]; p = 0.007).
Assessment of the user guide of spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws (Table 3)
Using invariable points A and B, there was no misplaced screw and no penetration of the SI joint: all screws were placed posterior to the joint. According to this method, the screw direction was estimated at 55.5° (95% CI [53.2–58.1]) anteriorly and medially in the transverse plane, 17.9° (95% CI [13.4–22.4]) downward and medially in the coronal plane and 24.4° (95% CI [17.4–31.3]) downward and anteriorly in the sagittal plane. The mean IS screw length was 76.3 mm (95% CI [75–77.7]). Only gender influenced the screw direction with regards to the sagittal plane. No other studied variable influenced the placement of the IS screw using this method.
Discussion
The anatomical study of the S1 sacral foramina and the S1 vertebral body demonstrates the narrowness of this region demanding an accurate surgical technique. Previously, Templeman et al. [19] showed that an intra-operative error as minor as 4 degrees may direct IS screws either into the S1 foramina or through the anterior cortex of the sacrum. Despite the presence of a narrow bone corridor, the present study advocates that spino-pelvic fixation with IS screws is achievable and reproducible in adult spinal surgery. In fact, this study highlights the relatively constant anatomy of the upper sacrum according to age, gender and morphologic characteristics, allowing the description of a reliable and fast technique of IS screw placement in the prone position. Except for the S1 body vertebral thickness, the majority of correlation coefficients are below 0.5. Ebraheim et al. [29] reported similar results: according to them, the measurements of male specimens were slightly larger than those from female specimens. Moreover, the totality of our measures had been performed on CT-scan; they consequently had a high precision of a tenth of a millimetre and a tenth of a degree, higher than other measurements achieved manually.
A common semantic confusion exists between the IS screw technique which bridges the sacroiliac joint ending into the contralateral ala of the sacrum or the S1 body for fixation of pelvic ring fractures as it was first described by Matta et al. [11, 32] and the IS screw which passes posterior and cephalad to the sacroiliac joint ending in the S1 body, described by Dubousset et al. [12] as a pelvic anchor for long spinal instrumentations. In the present study, only the latter technique was assessed. Indeed, they have little in common. The technique described by Matta et al. [11, 32] and Routt et al. [10] later described a percutaneous technique using cannulated lag screws on patients respectively lying in the prone and the supine positions. In this case, the IS screw crosses the injured sacroiliac joint. This type of fixation was not intended to prolong or to strengthen spinopelvic instrumentations. However, the technique described by Dubousset [12] was performed on patients lying in the prone position and has not changed since. In this case, the IS screw does not cross the sacroiliac joint but courses behind the joint and spares it. Further developments included the design of an ancillary and improvements of the connector that simplified the technique for less experienced surgeons (iliosacral connector E-Spine EUROS, France) (Fig. 1).
The osseous tunnel crossed by the screw in both techniques varies, as well as the entry point and direction. While the entry point of the iliosacral screw on the external aspect of the iliac bone is strictly fixed for pelvic ring trauma (lateral X-ray using fluoroscopy or surgical navigation are mandatory), its location or point C in the present study is variable. A dedicated ancillary now guides the entry point in the latter technique.
Regarding the optimal placement of the iliosacral screw, according to Routt et al. [10] the percutaneous technique in the supine position for pelvic ring fractures imposes a direction perpendicular to and across the SI joint (or sacral fracture), through the sacral ala, cephalad to the S1 neural foramina, caudad to the L5/S1 disc space, and terminating within the body of S1 or the contralateral sacral ala. According to the technique described by Dubousset et al. [12], the IS screw has a variable entry point on the external cortex of the iliac bone, passes posterior and cephalad to the sacroiliac joint and through a connector 10 mm embedded in a curetted hole at the base of the S1 superior articular process, runs caudal and parallel to the L5/S1 disc space and ends with a tip ideally located at the center of the S1 body. Knowing the distinctive characteristics of these two techniques bearing the same name, one may notice that to this date, no cadaveric study has assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the IS screw placement as described by Dubousset et al. [12]. This present work aims to provide accurate landmarks and a practical radiographic user guide for further studies aiming to confirm these data with surgeons in the setting of cadaveric simulations or clinical trials.
The percutaneous placement of the IS screw is the other advantage of this spino-pelvic fixation [7]. Initially, surgeons had to expose the outer iliac cortex to introduce the IS screw, and the Beurier connector was positioned in the IS space as described by Farcy et al. [3]. The development of new percutaneous ancillaries allows a safer placement of the IS screw in the prone position without dissecting the IS region. This possibility of minimally invasive surgery could reduce the risk of peri-operative complications like surgical-site infections [33]. It is not necessary to expose the external iliac wing because the entry point (point C) of the IS screw at the level of the external aspect of the iliac bone is a variable point. To achieve a correct placement, the direction of the IS screw has to pass through the invariable points A and B as previously described in the present study. In fact, point A corresponds to the position of the connector between the IS screw and the spinal instrumentation next to the entry point of the S1 pedicular screw. Point A is exposed during the surgical approach and navigation or fluoroscopy is not necessary to locate it. Point B is positioned under the junction of the middle third and anterior third of the sacral endplate representing the densest trabecular bone of the sacrum as demonstrated by Peretz et al. [20, 21]. Point B can be located either by a simple lateral X-ray on fluoroscopy or by surgical navigation. Subsequently, point C is deduced from both precedent points and exposed by percutaneous approach. Thus, we preferred to describe the optimal screw direction according to the conventional tridimensional planes and not according to the posterior sacral aspect as extensive sacral exposure is not necessary for this percutaneous technique.
Some authors advocated that IS screw fixation is a strong fixation bringing equivalent stability in comparison with other pelvic fixations [34, 35]. Important stability of this fixation depends on four factors. The first factor is the tricortical bone anchorage (external and internal cortical iliac bones, posterior cortex of the sacrum) preventing screw pullout and instrumentation failure [3]. The second factor is the placement of the screw throughout dense trabecular bone just below the sacral endplate and the sacral promontory [21]. The third factor is the transverse position of the screw leading to a load sharing effect of the hardware increasing the resistance against superior pullout forces related to the spinal instrumentation. This screw merges with the rotational axis of the SI joint constituting the fourth factor of stability. This screw preserves the SI joint since it does not bridge it and spares its motion.
Even though pelvic fixation with IS screws seems to be interesting in adult spinal deformity, long-term prospective studies are mandatory to completely validate this surgical method. Only two studies retrospectively assessed this sacro-pelvic fixation in adult spinal surgery [3, 14]. Farcy et al. [3] retrospectively analyzed 28 consecutive patients with this pelvic fixation. After a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, no neurologic complications were observed and 95% of the patients had radiographic evidence of fusion. Furthermore, among these 28 included patients, 23 presented with pseudarthrosis following previous surgery showing that IS screw fixation could be an alternative in case of failure of other spino-pelvic fixations. Ould-Slimane et al. [14] analyzed radiographic outcomes of sacro-pelvic fixation with ilioscral screws after a two-year follow-up. No mechanical complication was reported and lumbo-pelvic correction was performed in all cases.
Assessment in the supine position could be considered as a measurement bias in the present study. In fact, during the surgical procedure, pelvic fixation and posterior spinal instrumentation are performed in the prone position and this difference may modify these measurements. However, we considered this difference of measurement negligible because the rotary motion of SI joints is usually inferior to 4° and decreases with age [36, 37]. Furthermore, the respective positions of points A and B are invariable and consequently do not change according to the supine or prone position. Finally, most parameters were measured from intrinsic landmarks. Such landmarks do not change according to patient position.
Spino-pelvic fixation using IS screws is one option among the numerous types of described lumbosacral fixations. This computed tomographic simulation advocates the interest of this new user guide of pelvic fixation with IS screw but it must be clinically evaluated to completely consider this user guide as reliable and reproducible. With sufficient knowledge of this percutaneous surgical procedure, it is possible without navigation to correctly place IS screws in the prone position despite the proximity of the S1 sacral foramina and the presence of a narrow bone corridor that remains relatively constant independent of age, gender and patient morphologic characteristics.
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
confidence interval
- CT-scan:
-
computed tomography
- First sacral foramina:
-
S1–2 foramina
- IS:
-
iliosacral
- SEM:
-
standard error of the mean
References
Balderston RA, Winter RB, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE (1986) Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 11(8):824–829
Shen FH, Mason JR, Shimer AL, Arlet VM (2013) Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S265–S275
Farcy JP, Rawlins BA, Glassman SD (1992) Technique and results of fixation to the sacrum with iliosacral screws. Spine 17(6 Suppl):S190–S195
Tsuchiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Baldus C (2006) Minimum 5-year analysis of L5-S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity. Spine 31(3):303–308
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Robke J, Yeasting RA (1996) Radiologic evaluation of iliosacral screw placement. Spine 21(5):582–588
Mendel T, Radetzki F, Wohlrab D, Stock K, Hofmann GO, Noser H (2013) CT-based 3-D visualisation of secure bone corridors and optimal trajectories for sacroiliac screws. Injury 44(7):957–963
Fischer S, Vogl TJ, Marzi I, Zangos S, Wichmann JL, Scholtz J-E et al (2015) Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint disruptions with CT-controlled guidewires performed by interventionalists: single center experience in treating posterior pelvic instability. Eur J Radiol 84(2):290–294
Wu T, Chen W, Li X, Zhang Q, Lv H-Z, Zhang Y-Z (2015) Biomechanical comparison of three types of internal fixation in a type C zone II pelvic fracture model. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(2):1853–1861
Reuther G, Röhner U, Will T, Dehne I, Petereit U (2014) CT-guided screw fixation of vertical sacral fractures in local anaesthesia using a standard CT. RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Nukl 186(12):1134–1139
Routt ML, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA (1995) Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma 9(3):207–214
Matta JM, Tornetta P (1996) Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop (329):129–40
Dubousset J (1973) Pelvic obliquity. A three dimensional deformity. Paris Groupe d’étude de la scoliose
Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashmun RD, Roach J (1990) Immediate complications of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to the sacro-pelvis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine 15(9):932–941
Ould-Slimane M, Miladi L, Rousseau M-A, Bonaccorsi R, Catonne Y, Lazennec J-Y et al (2013) Sacropelvic fixation with iliosacral screws: applications and results in adult spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(4):212–217
Miladi L, Journe A, Mousny M (2013) H3S2 (3 hooks, 2 screws) construct: a simple growing rod technique for early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S96–105
Zahi R, Vialle R, Abelin K, Mary P, Khouri N, Damsin J-P (2010) Spinopelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in neuromuscular spinal deformities: results in a prospective cohort of 62 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 26(1):81–86
Miladi LT, Ghanem IB, Draoui MM, Zeller RD, Dubousset JF (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation for pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis. A long-term follow-up study. Spine 22(15):1722–1729
Ziran BH, Wasan AD, Marks DM, Olson SA, Chapman MW (2007) Fluoroscopic imaging guides of the posterior pelvis pertaining to iliosacral screw placement. J Trauma 62(2):347–356 discussion 356
Templeman D, Schmidt A, Freese J, Weisman I (1996) Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. Clin Orthop 329:194–198
Peretz AM, Hipp JA, Heggeness MH (1998) The internal bony architecture of the sacrum. Spine 23(9):971–974
Ebraheim N, Sabry FF, Nadim Y, Xu R, Yeasting RA (2000) Internal architecture of the sacrum in the elderly. An anatomic and radiographic study. Spine 25(3):292–297
Esenkaya I, Aluçlu MA, Kavakli A, Bulut HT (2003) Radiologic and morphologic evaluation of the lateral sacral mass. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 37(4):330–339
Esenkaya I (2002) A morphologic evaluation of the sacroiliac joint and plate fixation on a pelvic model using a S1 pedicular screw, transiliosacral screws, and a compression rod for sacroiliac joint injuries. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 36(5):432–441
Miller AN, Routt MLC (2012) Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(1):8–16
Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Challgren E, Heck B (1998) Location of the sacral pedicle, foramina, and ala on the lateral aspect of the sacrum: a radiographic study. Orthopedics 21(6):703–706
Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Biyani A, Galluch D, Yang H, Yeasting RA (2000) Location of the first and second sacral nerve roots in relation to pedicle screw placement. Am J Orthop Belle Mead NJ 29(11):873–877
Liguoro D, Viejo-Fuertes D, Midy D, Guerin J (1999) The posterior sacral foramina: an anatomical study. J Anat 195(Pt 2):301–304
Jackson H, Burke JT (1984) The sacral foramina. Skelet Radiol 11(4):282–288
Ebraheim NA, Lin D, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1999) Evaluation of the upper sacrum by three-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthop 28(10):578–582
Gras F, Gottschling H, Schröder M, Marintschev I, Hofmann GO, Burgkart R (2016) Transsacral osseous corridor anatomy is more amenable to screw insertion in males: a biomorphometric analysis of 280 Pelves. Clin Orthop 474(10):2304–2311
Magid D, Fishman EK, Ney DR (1991) Sacral foramina: view at CT. Radiology 178(2):573–574
Matta JM, Saucedo T (1989) Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Clin Orthop 242:83–97
Uribe JS, Deukmedjian AR (2015) Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 3):386–396
Giráldez-Sánchez MA, Lázaro-Gonzálvez Á, Martínez-Reina J, Serrano-Toledano D, Navarro-Robles A, Cano-Luis P et al (2015) Percutaneous iliosacral fixation in external rotational pelvic fractures. A biomechanical analysis. Injury 46(2):327–332
Li C-L (2014) Clinical comparative analysis on unstable pelvic fractures in the treatment with percutaneous sacroiliac screws and sacroiliac joint anterior plate fixation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18(18):2704–2708
Egund N, Olsson TH, Schmid H, Selvik G (1978) Movements in the sacroiliac joints demonstrated with roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19(5):833–846
Walker JM (1992) The sacroiliac joint: a critical review. Phys Ther 72(12):903–916
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No author received any financial support that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. No author or any member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
I agree and confirm this statement as true.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dubory, A., Bouloussa, H., Riouallon, G. et al. A computed tomographic anatomical study of the upper sacrum. Application for a user guide of pelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in adult spinal deformity. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 2543–2553 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3580-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3580-5