Abstract
This review aims to provide an overview of neoplastic lesions associated with genetic diseases affecting the female reproductive organs. It seeks to enhance our understanding of the radiological aspects in diagnosing genetic diseases including hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, and Swyer syndrome, and explores the patterns and mechanisms of inheritance that require elucidation. Additionally, we discuss the imaging characteristics of lesions occurring in other regions due to the same genetic diseases.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hereditary gynecological tumors present a complex and challenging field in clinical management, but advancements in medical imaging and genetic research have led to improved understanding and characterization of these conditions. Radiologists play a crucial role in this domain, utilizing their expertise to estimate tumor histology and contribute significantly to patient care. However, radiologists often face knowledge gaps between their specialty and other fields, and understanding the genetic patterns of these diseases may still be incomplete.
This review not only focuses on well-known hereditary conditions such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and Lynch syndrome, but also on diseases encountered in routine practice, including benign ones. By understanding these genetic patterns and grasping the differences in imaging and clinical characteristics between hereditary and sporadic tumors, we aim to provide deeper diagnoses and appropriate investigative plans based on imaging and patient/family history.
Inheritance pattern
Although various genetic patterns exist, many of the diseases discussed in this review follow an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. This implies that when one parent has a mutated gene on an autosome (non-sex chromosome), their child has a 50% chance to inherit this gene.
Swyer syndrome is associated with various genetic inheritance patterns beyond autosomal dominant inheritance. Among these patterns, Y-linked inheritance is a major one. This pattern involves genes located on the Y chromosome. Thus, diseases or conditions linked to these genes are exclusive to males. Another pattern is a sex-limited autosomal recessive pattern. This involves autosomal genes (non-sex chromosome), which express traits or conditions specifically in one sex, even though both sexes can carry these genes. In this pattern, an individual inherits two copies of a recessive gene, one from each parent, to express a trait or condition. However, owing to factors such as hormonal differences, anatomical variances, or other sex-specific influences, the trait or condition may manifest solely in one sex. [1].
Table 1 summarizes the causative genes and inheritance patterns for each genetic disease.
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC)
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) is a condition characterized by an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers. HBOC occurs in approximately 1 in 400–500 individuals, accounting for approximately 5% of breast cancers and 15% of ovarian cancers. People with HBOC are often diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50, with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) being the most prevalent type of ovarian cancer associated with this syndrome [2, 3]. HBOC should be suspected in individuals with a personal or family history (Table 2) [2,3,4]. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is also acknowledged as an early form of HGSC [5]. Despite being named ovarian cancer syndromes, many of these cancers are fallopian tube carcinomas rather than ovarian carcinomas [5].
It is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, mainly due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, which play crucial roles in DNA repair. BRCA1 is a large gene located on chromosome 17q21, and its function is primarily associated with DNA integrity. It plays a significant role in the homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks, as well as in regulating cell cycle checkpoints and functioning as a co-factor for numerous transcription factors. It also controls cellular proliferation by regulating cell death (apoptosis). BRCA2 is located on chromosome 13q12-13, and it is functionally associated with the homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks [3]. When functioning properly, these genes assist in repairing DNA breaks via homologous recombination. However, this repair mechanism is impaired in cancer cells harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, making the cells more vulnerable to cancer development. Conversely, these variants render cancer cells sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. PARP inhibitors block base excision repair by converting single-stranded breaks into double-stranded breaks. Therefore, BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant-positive cancers exhibit heightened sensitivity to platinum-based agents and PARP inhibition owing to defective homologous recombination in tumor cells [6].
HGSC is characterized by a higher incidence of bilateral disease, smaller tumor size, higher signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging, and more advanced stage at presentation than other epithelial ovarian cancers [7]. Further, HGSCs with BRCA1 variants (Fig. 1a and b) are larger and more intensely enhanced, have higher levels of the tumor marker CA125, and exhibit lymph node metastases more frequently than those with BRCA2 variants [8]. Additionally, HGSCs without BRCA variants typically display an infiltrative pattern within the peritoneal cavity, which can obscure the tumor margins and reduce visibility. These tumors are also more likely to spread to inaccessible sites such as the lesser sac, complicating the surgical procedure of primary debulking [9].
Regarding breast cancer, individuals with BRCA1 variants typically develop the disease at a younger age and may initially present with more benign features (circumscribed margins, oval shapes, and posterior acoustic enhancement). However, these cancers tend to be more aggressive, have a poorer prognosis, and often exhibit a triple-negative phenotype (Fig. 1c and d), than breast cancer with BRCA2 variants. The MRI findings characteristic of triple-negative breast cancer included pronounced rim enhancement and internal necrosis. In contrast, breast cancers associated with BRCA2 variants resemble more spontaneous forms and are often linked to the luminal B phenotype and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [10].
Lynch syndrome
Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, significantly increases the risk for various cancers, particularly colorectal and endometrial cancers. Approximately 1 in 300 individuals have Lynch syndrome. This results in extensive genetic alterations, particularly in repetitive DNA sequences. Individuals with this syndrome are often diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50. In addition to colorectal and endometrial cancers, it is associated with cancers of the ovary, stomach, small intestine, hepatobiliary tract, prostate, brain, pancreas, and urothelial tract [11, 12]. The Amsterdam II Criteria are commonly used to diagnose Lynch syndrome (Table 3) [13].
Lynch syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Characteristically, Lynch syndrome tumors exhibit defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR), leading to microsatellite instability (MSI). Microsatellites are short sequences that are typically composed of repeated base units within DNA and should be copied faithfully. MSI refers to the condition in which microsatellites are not accurately replicated. Normally, when a mismatch in DNA is detected, specific enzymes remove the incorrect base insert the correct one, and prevent gene mutations and the development of cancer; during MSI, these repeated regions are replicated incorrectly, leading to gene mutation and cancer development [14]. Lynch syndrome is diagnosed when pathogenic variants are identified in MMR genes, specifically MLH1 or MSH2, and sometimes MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM. The diminished MMR function increases the likelihood of changes occurring in repeat sequence regions in the coding regions of genes involved in tumor suppression, cell proliferation, DNA repair, apoptosis, and other aspects of carcinogenesis. The accumulation of abnormalities in these genes is believed to contribute to tumor initiation and growth. The cumulative lifetime risk for endometrial cancer is reportedly up to 26% in individuals with a mutation in MSH6 and up to 15% in those with a mutation in PMS2. Mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 confer a 25–60% increase in risk, which is substantially higher than the 2.9% lifetime risk for endometrial cancer in the general population [14].
Unlike sporadic cancers, endometrial cancers linked with Lynch syndrome (Fig. 2) are more commonly found in the lower uterine segment. These cancers typically display endometrioid histological features similar to those observed in a broader population. Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancers often present with characteristics such as stage I disease, endometrioid differentiation, low-grade lesions, peritumoral lymphocytes, and lymphovascular invasion. A notable high-risk molecular marker of these cancers is the presence of MSH2/MSH6 abnormalities [15,16,17].
In a comprehensive analysis of ovarian cancers associated with Lynch syndrome, there was a notable increase in the incidence of non-serous histological subtypes (Fig. 3). This study identified mixed ovarian carcinoma, including mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell types, as the most prevalent, accounting for 33% of cases. This was followed by endometrioid carcinoma (25%) and serous carcinoma (22%) [18, 19].
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a genetic disorder characterized by melanotic macules, intestinal polyps, and an elevated lifetime risk for malignancies in the uterus, ovary, breast, colon, stomach, small intestine, pancreas, lungs, and testicles. The frequency of PJS carriers is approximately 1 in 100,000 individuals [20]. The diagnostic criteria for PJS are listed in Table 4 [21].
PJS is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, and arises from mutations in STK11, a tumor suppressor serine/threonine kinase gene previously called LKB1, on chromosome 19p. STK11 is activated in response to metabolic stress and hypoxic conditions caused by energy deficiency within tumors. Its related pathways include gene expression (transcription) and regulation of TP53 activity. STK11 plays a role in various processes such as cell metabolism, cell polarity, apoptosis, and the DNA damage response [22].
In terms of associated malignancies, PJS is linked to human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (GAS) (Fig. 4), which is found in 11–17% of female patients with PJS. Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) is often identified as a precursor to GAS. In a review of patients with PJS, the median age at diagnosis was 17 years in those with LEGH and 35 years in those with GAS [23]. Typically, GAS has a worse prognosis than HPV-associated adenocarcinomas [5]. Furthermore, patients with GAS associated with PJS tend to have worse outcomes and shorter progression-free and overall survival than those with sporadic cancers [23]. Infiltrative growth patterns, intratumoral cyst formation, and heterogeneous enhancement are characteristic MRI findings in GAS [24]. The shape of LEGH on MR images has been divided into two patterns: “cosmos pattern” [25] or “flower-type” [26], which comprised numerous small cysts surrounded by several larger cysts, and 2) lesions with “microcystic pattern” [27] or “raspberry-type” [26], which consisted of a close aggregation of numerous tiny cysts. In addition, most tumors are located in the upper portion of the cervical canal, the entire cervix, or in the endocervix.
PJS is also commonly associated with ovarian tumors such as sex cord tumors with annular tubules (SCTATs) (Fig. 5a) and Sertoli cell tumors. Mucinous tumors (Fig. 5b and c) are another ovarian neoplasm linked to the PJS. SCTATs are distinctive ovarian neoplasms featuring nests of cells that form ring-like structures surrounding basement membrane-like materials. Diseases associated with PJS often present as benign, multifocal, and bilateral, with very small or even microscopic tumors showing signs of calcification. Patients may also experience hyperestrogenism symptoms. In contrast, SCTATs that occur independent of the PJS tend to be unilateral and significantly larger, sometimes extending beyond the ovary [28].
Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS), commonly known as the Gorlin syndrome, is a genetic disorder characterized by multiple basal cell carcinomas on the skin, cysts in the jaw, small pits on the palms and soles, calcium deposits in the brain, developmental disabilities, and skeletal abnormalities [29]. The diagnostic criteria for NBCSS are listed in Table 5 [30]. Owing to the increased risk for multiple skin cancers, individuals with NBCCS are advised to avoid radiation therapy because it can increase the risk for basal cell skin cancer.
NBCCS typically follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern; however, approximately 30% of the cases arise without a known family history [29]. This syndrome is mainly associated with mutations in PTCH1, which has been identified as the gene responsible for NBCCS as well as some related sporadic tumors. PTCH1 has been mapped to 9q22.3-31 and dysregulation of signaling caused by the inactivation of PTCH1 has been implicated in the development of NBCCS and some related sporadic tumors, supporting the hypothesis that PTCH1 is a tumor suppressor gene in this syndrome [31].
Ovarian fibromas are prevalent in 25% of patients with NBCCS. Ovarian fibromas associated with NBCCS (Fig. 6) are commonly bilateral (75%) and often exhibit calcification and a nodular appearance. In contrast, ovarian fibromas not associated with this syndrome are typically unilateral, with calcification occurring in only 10% of cases [32]. Ovarian fibromas tend to show markedly low T2-weighted signals and are occasionally mistakenly diagnosed as calcified uterine leiomyomas. NBCCS is also associated with various forms of ovarian fibromas and fibrosarcomas. Cellular fibrous tumors with moderate to high nuclear atypia are classified as fibrosarcomas, whereas those with high mitotic activity but lacking severe atypia are categorized as mitotically active cellular fibromas [32, 33] (Fig. 7).
Swyer syndrome
Swyer syndrome, also known as XY gonadal dysgenesis, is a rare developmental disorder in which individuals with an XY chromosome pair, typically females, experience abnormal development of their sex glands. In this condition, the gonads are underdeveloped and non-functional and are often described as streak gonads [34, 35].
Swyer syndrome is frequently associated with mutations in SRY, MAP3K1, NR5A1, and DHH. Mutations in the MAP3K1 or DHH genes result in 18% of cases, while 15% of cases are due to mutations in the SRY or NR5A1 genes. Other cases occur due to certain non-genetic factors, such as hormonal medications administered during pregnancy. The SRY gene encodes a protein that regulates the start of male sex determination by activating the gene encoding the Müllerian inhibitory substance. Most cases of SRY-related are not inherited. However, some individuals inherit an altered SRY gene with a Y-linked inheritance pattern. MAP3K1 encodes a protein that helps regulate signaling pathways controlling various processes in the body, including those that determine sexual characteristics before birth. NR5A1 encodes a transcription factor, which helps control the activity of several genes related to the development of the gonads and adrenal glands. MAP3K1- or NR5A1-related Swyer syndrome is often non-inherited but may follow an autosomal dominant pattern. Genetic changes in DHH affect sexual differentiation, and DHH-related Swyer syndrome is inherited in a sex-limited autosomal recessive manner, indicating that both copies of the gene in each cell carry this variant [35].
A major concern in Swyer syndrome is the high risk for gonadoblastoma. Therefore, early diagnosis is imperative owing to the elevated risk for gonadoblastoma and germ cell malignancies, necessitating timely gonadectomy [36]. Gonadoblastomas can vary in size, with some growing up to approximately 8 cm. However, many are small, ranging from a few to approximately a dozen millimeters when examined under a microscope [36]. These tumors are often unexpectedly discovered in specimens obtained during prophylactic gonadectomy. Punctate calcifications are observed on CT scans [36] and may even be identifiable on plain radiographs because of their coarse appearance [37]. While there are no comprehensive reports on MRI-based diagnosis, some studies have suggested that gonadoblastomas exhibit low signal intensities on both T1- and T2-weighted imaging [38]. Malignant germ cell tumors that occur during adolescence are believed to originate from late primordial germ cells. Among these tumors, precursor lesions include gonadoblastoma and germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) [39]. In 20–30% of Swyer syndrome cases, malignant germ cell tumors, including dysgerminoma (seminoma-like tumors) (Fig. 8), can develop, often affecting both sides. Dysgerminomas are frequently divided into lobules that enhance the septa. They typically exhibit low or isointense signals on T2-weighted imaging and are often associated with elevated levels of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) [40, 41].
Conclusion
The accurate diagnosis of hereditary gynecological tumors requires a multifaceted approach that integrates patient age, medical history, and family history, along with a deep understanding of the imaging characteristics specific to these tumors. The importance of knowing not only the imaging characteristics but also the genetic predisposition and associated tumors is emphasized in order to implement this approach. This comprehensive strategy is essential to achieve an accurate diagnosis that goes beyond a localized evaluation and is critical to evaluate and manage hereditary gynecologic tumors and ensure effective patient care. However, for individuals with genetic conditions associated with gynecologic cancers, currently there are no effective screening tests for ovarian cancer, and some screening for uterine cancer is conducted using transvaginal ultrasound, but its utility remains unknown [42].
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Alliance G, Screening Services TNY-M-AC for G and N (2009) Inheritance patterns. In: Understanding genetics: a New York, mid-atlantic guide for patients and health professionals. Genetic alliance
Petrucelli N, Daly MB, Pal T (1993) BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al (eds) GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle (WA)
Chung SH, Woldenberg N, Roth AR, et al (2020) BRCA and Beyond: Comprehensive Image-rich Review of Hereditary Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Syndromes. RadioGraphics 40:306–325. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020190084
Nelson HD, Fu R, Goddard K, et al (2013) Risk assessment, Genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation. agency for healthcare research and quality (US), Rockville (MD)
Board WC of TE female genital tumours
Moding EJ, Kastan MB, Kirsch DG (2013) Strategies for optimizing the response of cancer and normal tissues to radiation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:526–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4003
Tanaka YO, Okada S, Satoh T, et al (2016) Differentiation of epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes by use of imaging and clinical data: a detailed analysis. Cancer Imaging 16:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0061-9
Saida T, Shikama A, Mori K, et al (2022) Comparing Characteristics of Pelvic High-grade Serous Carcinomas with and without Breast Cancer Gene Variants on MR Imaging. MRMS mp.2022-0061. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2022-0061
Nougaret S, Lakhman Y, Gönen M, et al (2017) High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Associations between BRCA Mutation Status, CT Imaging Phenotypes, and Clinical Outcomes. Radiology 285:472–481. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161697
Ha SM, Chae EY, Cha JH, et al (2017) Association of BRCA Mutation Types, Imaging Features, and Pathologic Findings in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations. American Journal of Roentgenology 209:920–928. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16957
Yang Z, Liu X, Yang X, Liao Q-P (2021) Screening and identification of Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the frequency of Lynch syndrome-associated clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics in Lynch syndrome gynecologic cancers. Transl Cancer Res TCR 10:4523–4531. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-677
Post CCB, Stelloo E, Smit VTHBM, et al (2021) Prevalence and Prognosis of Lynch Syndrome and Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 113:1212–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab029
Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT (1999) New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 116:1453–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70510-x
Funkhouser WK, Lubin IM, Monzon FA, et al (2012) Relevance, Pathogenesis, and Testing Algorithm for Mismatch Repair–Defective Colorectal Carcinomas: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 14:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.11.001
Minamiguchi K, Takahama J, Marugami N, et al (2016) MR findings of Lynch syndrome-related uterine endometrial carcinoma: a case report. Abdom Radiol 41:1703–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0721-z
Westin SN, Lacour RA, Urbauer DL, et al (2008) Carcinoma of the Lower Uterine Segment: A Newly Described Association With Lynch Syndrome. JCO 26:5965–5971. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6296
Zhao S, Chen L, Zang Y, et al (2022) Endometrial cancer in Lynch syndrome. International Journal of Cancer 150:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33763
Helder-Woolderink JM, Blok EA, Vasen HFA, et al (2016) Ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome; a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 55:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.12.005
Nakamura K, Banno K, Yanokura M, et al (2014) Features of ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 2:909–916. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.397
Sandru F, Petca A, Dumitrascu MC, et al (2021) Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: Skin manifestations and endocrine anomalies (Review). Exp Ther Med 22:1387. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10823
Wu M, Krishnamurthy K (2023) Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)
Klimkowski S, Ibrahim M, Ibarra Rovira JJ, et al (2021) Peutz–Jeghers Syndrome and the Role of Imaging: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Associated Cancers. Cancers 13:5121. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13205121
Gordhandas SB, Kahn R, Sassine D, et al (2022) Gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review of the literature with proposed screening guidelines. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 32:. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-002997
Mori T, Kato H, Kawaguchi M, et al (2023) MRI characteristics for predicting histological subtypes in patients with uterine cervical adenocarcinoma. European Journal of Radiology 158:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110612
Tsuboyama T, Yamamoto K, Nakai G, et al (2015) A case of gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 40:459–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0323-6
Omori M, Kondo T, Tagaya H, et al (2019) Utility of imaging modalities for predicting carcinogenesis in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia. PLoS ONE 14:e0221088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221088
Ohya A, Kobara H, Miyamoto T, et al (2021) Usefulness of the ‘cosmos pattern’ for differentiating between cervical gastric‐type mucin‐positive lesions and other benign cervical cystic lesions in magnetic resonance images. J of Obstet and Gynaecol 47:745–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14602
Bennett JA, Young RH, Howitt BE, et al (2021) A Distinctive Adnexal (Usually Paratubal) Neoplasm Often Associated With Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and Characterized by STK11 Alterations (STK11 Adnexal Tumor): A Report of 22 Cases. American Journal of Surgical Pathology 45:1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001677
Gorlin RJ (2004) Nevoid basal cell carcinoma (Gorlin) syndrome. Genet Med 6:530–539. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000144188.15902.c4
Veenstra-Knol HE, Scheewe JH, van der Vlist GJ, et al (2005) Early recognition of basal cell naevus syndrome. Eur J Pediatr 164:126–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-004-1597-4
Pan S, Dong Q, Sun L-S, Li T-J (2010) Mechanisms of Inactivation of PTCH1 Gene in Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome: Modification of the Two-Hit Hypothesis. Clinical Cancer Research 16:442–450. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2574
Scalia AC, Farulla A, Fiocchi F, et al (2018) Imaging features of uterine and ovarian fibromatosis in Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome. J Radiol Case Rep 12:21–30. https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v12i9.3390
Yamada T, Hattori K, Satomi H, et al (2015) Mitotically active cellular fibroma of the ovary: a case report and literature review. J Ovarian Res 8:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-015-0191-x
Meyer KF, Freitas Filho LG, Silva KI, et al (2019) The XY female and SWYER syndrome. Urol Case Rep 26:100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2019.100939
Genetic testing - Gonadal dysgenesis XY; Swyer syndrome - DHH, MAP3K1, NR5A1 and SRY genes. - IVAMI. https://www.ivami.com/en/genetic-testing-human-gene-mutations-diseases-neoplasias-and-pharmacogenetics/4346-genetic-testing-gonadal-dysgenesis-xy-swyer-syndrome-swyer-syndrome-genes-dhh-map3k1-nr5a1-and-sry. Accessed 16 Dec 2023
Scully RE (1970) Gonadoblastoma. A review of 74 cases. Cancer 25:1340–1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197006)25:6<1340::aid-cncr2820250612>3.0.co;2-n
Gonadoblastoma: an ovarian tumor with characteristic pelvic calcifications. https://www.ajronline.org/doi/epdf/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.127.6.1001. Accessed 16 Dec 2023
Agarwal A, Agarwal S (2017) Swyer Syndrome With Gonadoblastoma: A Clinicoradiological Approach. J Hum Reprod Sci 10:65–68. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_132_16
Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LHJ (2019) Human germ cell tumours from a developmental perspective. Nat Rev Cancer 19:522–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0178-9
Tsuboyama T, Hori Y, Hori M, et al (2018) Imaging findings of ovarian dysgerminoma with emphasis on multiplicity and vascular architecture: pathogenic implications. Abdom Radiol 43:1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1503-6
Zhao S, Sun F, Bao L, et al (2020) Pure dysgerminoma of the ovary: CT and MRI features with pathological correlation in 13 tumors. J Ovarian Res 13:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00674-z
Daly MB, Pal T, Maxwell KN, et al (2023) NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 21:1000–1010. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.0051
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study conception and design performed by TS. Literature search and data collection were performed by MY, TS, TI, KM, MS, SS, SK, YF and TS. Supervision was performed by TN. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of the University of Tsukuba Hospital in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshida, M., Saida, T., Ishiguro, T. et al. Imaging approaches for the diagnosis of genetic diseases affecting the female reproductive organs and beyond. Abdom Radiol 49, 1664–1676 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04260-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04260-5