Abstract
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a potentially life-threatening condition with an associated high mortality. Prompt diagnosis is crucial to achieve a favorable outcome. The radiologist plays a central role in the initial evaluation of a patient with suspected AMI. In this pictorial essay, we review the appropriate imaging evaluation of a patient with suspected AMI, and we review both the common and uncommon etiologies of mesenteric ischemia. With each etiology presented, relevant clinical and imaging findings, as well as potential treatments, are reviewed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a potentially life-threatening condition accounting for approximately 1% of acute abdomen hospitalizations and associated with a high mortality rate ranging from 31% to 93% [1–4]. Diagnostic delay contributes to poor patient outcome [1, 2, 5]. Because clinical and laboratory findings, including leukocytosis, elevated lactate, and metabolic acidosis, are nonspecific and insensitive [6], the radiologist plays a crucial role in the initial evaluation of mesenteric ischemia.
The radiologist must recognize both common and uncommon etiologies of AMI. In this pictorial essay, imaging findings on multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and angiography of typical and unusual acute pathologies affecting blood flow in the mesenteric and portal vasculature will be reviewed. This includes occlusive pathologies of the mesenteric arteries, non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), and porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis. The discussion will include clinical findings, imaging appearance, acute complications, and typical management of each entity. The primary imaging findings and potentially differentiating features are summarized in Table 1.
Normal mesenteric vascular anatomy
The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) arises obliquely from the anterior aorta at approximately the L1 level. Its branches supply the distal duodenum, entire jejunum and ileum, and the ascending and transverse colon (Fig. 1). Most commonly, the first branch is the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery, followed by the middle colic artery. Beyond this level, multiple jejunal and ileal branches arise from the SMA trunk and anastomose via the mesenteric arcades. These arcades give rise to the vasa recta—end arteries supplying the bowel wall. The SMA terminates in the ileocolic artery, supplying the terminal ileum, the cecum and ascending colon, and the appendix.
In addition to the arcades within the SMA distribution, anastomoses between the celiac, SMA, and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) distributions provide additional collateral flow in most individuals. The inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery from the SMA is continuous with the superior pancreaticoduodenal artery from the celiac axis (the pancreaticoduodenal arcade). The marginal artery of Drummond courses along the mesenteric border of the entire length of the colon and represents an anastomosis around the level of the splenic flexure between the left branch of the middle colic artery (arising from the SMA, as discussed) and the ascending branch of the left colic artery (arising from the IMA). More centrally situated, the arc of Riolan (aka the “meandering mesenteric artery”) usually accompanies SMA or IMA stenosis or occlusion and connects the proximal middle colic artery of the SMA with the proximal left colic artery of the IMA [7]. Incomplete regression of the primitive fetal blood supply accounts for additional variations in the mesenteric vascular supply [8].
The mesenteric venous system is less variable. Venous blood from the jejunum, ileum, and proximal colon flows into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), which travels vertically to join the splenic vein, forming the portal vein. Blood in the IMA distribution from the midtransverse colon to the rectum flows into the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV), which may drain into the splenic vein or SMV. Additional drainage from the stomach and right colon often forms a common gastrocolic trunk before joining the SMV [8].
Stages of intestinal ischemia
Three stages of intestinal ischemia have been described [9]. The first stage is limited to the mucosa. Its earliest manifestation is increased mucosal permeability to albumin and other macromolecules (including intravenous contrast material), which leak into the bowel wall and lumen and may cause fluid distension of the bowel [10]. This is followed by mucosal and subepithelial edema and epithelial sloughing [10]. Mucosal necrosis, erosions, and ulcerations may develop but will eventually heal completely if the ischemia is reversed. This stage is therefore called reversible ischemic enteritis. On CT, bowel will appear thick walled, possibly with dilation or spasm. Edema will cause the bowel wall to be low in attenuation, while hyperattenuation suggests superimposed hemorrhage. The mucosa may have decreased or increased enhancement, depending on the presence of reperfusion or outflow obstruction. These findings are nonspecific and do not correlate with the severity of ischemia. The severity of bowel wall thickening will also vary depending on whether the inciting pathology is arterial or venous [9].
The second stage progresses to necrosis of the underlying submucosal and muscular layers, and healing from this stage may create a fibrotic stricture. Dilation is more common once deeper necrosis has occurred, due to reactive cessation of peristalsis or direct involvement of the muscular layer [9].
The third and final stage is complete transmural bowel wall necrosis, which is associated with a high mortality rate without immediate surgery [10]. Findings suggestive of transmural involvement include dilated thin-walled bowel (due to involvement of the intramural musculature and nerves) and perforation [9]. Pneumatosis and portal venous gas indicate an advanced stage of infarction (also considering other causes of pneumatosis), although not necessarily transmural involvement [11]. The imaging appearance at any stage may be complicated by submucosal or intramural hemorrhage or by superinfection of the bowel wall [9].
Techniques for imaging of acute mesenteric ischemia
With increased availability and quality of MDCT, computed tomography angiography (CTA) has replaced conventional angiography in the diagnosis of AMI. American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria® recommend CTA for rapid, noninvasive diagnosis of suspected AMI [12].
MDCT findings suggestive of AMI are listed in Table 2 [3, 4, 11, 13–15]. A biphasic mesenteric MDCT protocol that includes both arterial and venous phases is ideal [15, 16]. An arterial phase scan performed with 1.25–2.5 mm collimation is most helpful to detect subtle findings. However, patients with nonspecific symptoms not immediately suspicious for ischemia are more likely to undergo venous phase MDCT only—this likely accounts for the lower sensitivity and specificity of MDCT in some retrospective studies [17]. In other centers, a patient with nonspecific symptoms might undergo an initial noncontrast MDCT, followed by biphasic imaging upon discovery of abnormal small bowel loops. An unenhanced MDCT alone may otherwise be obtained in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. The sensitivity of MDCT is 0.66–0.96 and specificity is 0.67–0.98 [15–18]. Maximum intensity projections, multiplanar reconstructions, and volume-rendered images may also aid in the diagnosis [13]. Dual-energy MDCT may have additional advantages over conventional MDCT by increasing the conspicuity of ischemic segments [19] but is not yet widely available.
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with gadolinium is another imaging alternative that does not rely on radiation; however, its utility is limited by longer duration of scanning, lower spatial resolution, and inability to visualize vascular calcium (in atherosclerotic disease). Furthermore, the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis must be considered before administration of gadolinium to those with impaired renal function. MRA without a contrast agent has lower sensitivity and specificity than MRA with gadolinium and is usually not appropriate [12].
Mesenteric arterial thromboembolism
Acute embolic SMA occlusion is usually cardiogenic in origin (Fig. 2) and may coexist with infarcts in other organs from multiple emboli [20]. The MDCT appearance depends on the location of the thrombus, the degree and duration of vascular occlusion, and whether reperfusion has occurred. The embolus most commonly lodges at a branch point 3–8 cm distal to the SMA ostium (Fig. 3) [21]. This is often distal to the first jejunal branches and middle colic artery and consequently may spare the jejunum and transverse colon from ischemia [22]. A convex proximal surface of the thrombus suggests embolus rather than in situ thrombosis. All patients with peritoneal signs or threatened bowel by imaging (including dilation with thin wall, lack of enhancement, pneumatosis, porto-mesenteric gas, and free air) require surgical exploration. Otherwise, treatment varies between surgical embolectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis or thromboaspiration depending on whether the embolus partially or completely occludes the vessel and how proximal or distal it is located [1, 23].
Mesenteric arterial thrombosis
In situ thrombosis of the SMA is usually superimposed on pre-existing atherosclerotic plaque. The imaging appearance of SMA thrombosis can be similar to that of thromboembolism. The key in differentiating thrombosis of the SMA from thromboembolism lies in the location and appearance of the occlusion. SMA thrombosis tends to superimpose on ostial atherosclerotic plaque, consequently occurring within 2–3 cm of the SMA origin and proximal to the middle colic and early jejunal arteries (Fig. 4). The extent of intestinal infarct from thrombosis tends to be greater because the jejunum and colon are typically not spared [20, 21].
Collateral vessels suggest a chronic thrombosis or pre-existing high-grade stenosis. Acute symptoms usually require stenotic or occlusive disease of multiple visceral arteries with sudden blockage of a critical site (Fig. 5). Treatment of SMA thrombosis is historically surgical [1] and may include thrombectomy, mesenteric bypass grafting, patch angioplasty, reimplantation, and endarterectomy [2]. Increasingly, endovascular means of reperfusion are being used for arterial occlusive disease [23, 24], usually in combination with laparotomy for direct inspection of the bowel.
Mesenteric arterial dissection
Dissection of the SMA, either isolated [25, 26] or contiguous with aortic dissection [27], is a rare cause of AMI. Mesenteric ischemia worsens the prognosis in patients with aortic dissection [28]. Isolated visceral arterial dissection, most often of the SMA, is a rare condition not associated with aortic dissection. It usually begins along the anterior wall of the SMA curve 1.5–3 cm beyond the SMA origin (Fig. 6) [25]. While most cases of spontaneous visceral dissection are described as idiopathic [25], some might be attributed to dissecting aneurysms of segmental arterial mediolysis (SAM) (discussed later) [29]. Treatment of SMA dissection is medical with routine surveillance if the patient remains asymptomatic and if any associated visceral aneurysm measures less than 2 cm in diameter [25]. Symptomatic dissection or larger aneurysmal dilation may be treated by endovascular or surgical revascularization [25].
Strangulating small bowel obstruction, mesenteric volvulus, and closed-loop obstruction
MDCT findings that are most suggestive of ischemia in the setting of mechanical small bowel obstruction (regardless of cause) include decreased bowel wall mucosal enhancement [30, 31] and increased noncontrast attenuation of the bowel wall [31]. The latter sign is due to intramural hemorrhage resulting from venous congestion. The absence of mesenteric fluid is a reassuring sign that strangulation is not present [30].
Mesenteric volvulus and closed-loop obstruction may result in secondary bowel ischemia from extrinsic compression of mesenteric arteries or veins. Volvulus can be idiopathic or secondary to post-operative adhesions, hernia, or congenital malrotation [32, 33]. Twisting of the bowel in volvulus may result in a closed-loop bowel obstruction. Closed-loop obstruction may also occur without volvulus due to adhesions or small-necked hernia. By MDCT, the twisted mesentery can be identified by swirling strands of soft tissue/vessels and mesenteric fat—the whirl sign (Fig. 7) [33]. The whirl sign is appreciated best perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the volvulus and may be most easily recognized on coronal or sagittal images and MIP reconstructions. Obstructed patients with the whirl sign are 25 times more likely to need an operation than those without the sign [34]. As the mesenteric twist tightens, the mesenteric venous supply, followed by the mesenteric arterial supply, becomes compressed, resulting in ischemia. If unrelieved, infarct of the affected bowel loops can ensue [35]. The venous cut-off sign reflects occlusion of the SMV at the point of torsion or compression (Figs. 8, 9) [36].
Other than the whirl sign and venous cut-off sign, CT signs that distinguish volvulus and strangulating obstruction from other causes of mesenteric ischemia include a U-shaped segment of fluid-dilated bowel terminated at each end by two adjacent loops of decompressed bowel, fusiform tapering and a triangular configuration of bowel in cross section at the site of obstruction, and upstream bowel dilation (Fig. 10) [32]. While a minority of cases of closed-loop obstruction may be treated conservatively, any case with bowel compromise requires urgent surgical decompression.
Mesenteric arterial vasculitis and vasculopathy
Vasculitides and collagen vascular disorders rarely cause mesenteric ischemia (Table 3) [37–45]. Presentation is usually of chronic ischemia rather than acute infarction. General MDCT signs of vasculopathy include stenosis, often over a long segment without calcification or irregularity characteristic of atherosclerosis, vascular occlusion, vascular wall thickening and enhancement, perivascular inflammation, and aneurysm (Fig. 11) [39]. Surgical or endoluminal revascularization may be combined with medical treatment of the underlying inflammatory process. Unfortunately, steroids, which are frequently administered for treatment of these inflammatory disorders, may increase the risk of gastrointestinal complications and may mask peritoneal symptoms following an acute vascular event.
Noninflammatory, nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies may also affect the mesenteric arteries, including fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and SAM. These two distinct entities have overlapping features on imaging and histology but are differentiated by clinical factors. FMD is most common in young females and may present with occlusive disease, most often of the renal and internal carotid arteries. Mesenteric involvement in FMD is unusual.
In comparison, SAM tends to present with spontaneous hemorrhage or acute luminal occlusion in late middle-age and elderly patients with slight male predilection [46]. Despite being a rare diagnosis, abdominal visceral involvement is the most common manifestation of SAM [29]. Renal arteries and iliac arteries may also be affected. The distinct hallmark of the diagnosis is the presence of dissecting aneurysms (Fig. 12) [29]. Cavitation within the outer portion of the arterial wall media leads to mural weakening, dissection, and pseudoaneurysm formation [29, 46]. MDCT may reveal multifocal involvement with a segmental, skip pattern, alternating stenotic and aneurysmal portions, and circumferential or partial arterial wall involvement. SAM may be under recognized and may underlie an apparently spontaneous SMA dissection [29].
Ischemia from mesenteric trauma
Traumatic SMA injuries are rare but highly lethal, resulting more often from penetrating than blunt trauma [47]. A paucity of literature on these uncommon injuries exists, but mortality has been shown to correlate with location of the SMA injury (Table 4) [47–49]. The high rate of mortality is in part related to the difficulty in obtaining control of the injured artery or valveless porto-mesenteric vein and also from compromised bowel perfusion [47, 50]. Despite technical advances in the past decade, overall mortality from SMA traumatic injuries remains high (33%, not broken down by Fullen zone) [51], compared with prior overall rate of 39% [49].
A moderate to large volume of free fluid on MDCT following abdominal trauma is one of the most sensitive findings of either bowel or mesenteric injury and could represent extraluminal bowel contents and/or extravasated blood products. Beaded irregularity or abrupt termination of mesenteric vessels, even without active bleeding, is a relatively specific finding of mesenteric injury [52]. The absence of free fluid excludes bowel or mesenteric injury [52], whereas active hemorrhage into the mesentery indicates significant mesenteric injury that requires laparotomy (Fig. 13) [53].
Bowel wall thickening and abnormal enhancement can be seen with transmural or partial thickness bowel injuries as well as with devascularization or ischemia from mesenteric vascular injury and is therefore not specific [52]. Both, however, necessitate surgical exploration for resection and/or reperfusion of compromised bowel loops. Diffuse hyperenhancement and bowel wall thickening arising from hypoperfusion (and accompanied by other imaging signs such as a flattened inferior vena cava and adrenal and renal hyperenhancement) should be differentiated from mesenteric or bowel wall injuries, which tend to be more focal [53].
Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia
NOMI is disproportionate mesenteric vasoconstriction that can progress to bowel infarction. NOMI accounts for approximately 16% of cases of mesenteric ischemia [20]. It is most commonly implicated in the critically ill patient with a low-flow state from a variety of causes. Splanchnic vasoconstriction to maintain perfusion pressure is the normal physiologic response to a reduction in blood pressure [10], but this autoregulation eventually fails when blood pressure falls below a certain threshold [54]. Septic shock, hypovolemic or hemorrhagic shock, cardiogenic shock, vasoconstrictor administration, and vasoactive drugs (digoxin and ergotamine) have all been reported as causes of NOMI [55, 56]. The high mortality rate of NOMI is attributed to the conundrum of further mesenteric circulation compromise resulting from vasoactive drugs needed to support systemic circulation. Intra-arterial infusion of papaverine is the treatment of choice for reversing the vasoconstriction, combined with surgery when peritoneal signs are present [1].
Some of the imaging signs of NOMI classically described for digital subtraction angiography (Table 5) [57, 58] may be seen on CTA [59]. A retrospective study of the diagnosis of NOMI by MDCT (compared with surgically confirmed mesenteric ischemia) in patients after cardiac surgery found MDCT had high sensitivity but low specificity [60]. MDCT signs are primarily those of bowel ischemia (i.e., wall thickening, luminal dilation, pneumatosis, intravenous gas, free air, and ascites) without vessel cut-off to indicate an occlusive etiology (Fig. 14) [60]. In a small series of patients with NOMI, CTA demonstrated findings classically seen on angiography including irregular narrowing of the SMA, spasm of visceral arcades, and poor opacification of intramural vessels [59]. The diameter of the SMA was also significantly narrower (mean of 3.4 ± 1.1 mm) compared with normal controls (6.0 ± 1.5 mm) [59]. Although these findings show promise, they require validation in a larger number of patients—in general, NOMI remains a diagnosis of exclusion in at-risk patients undergoing MDCT.
Porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis
Porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis accounts for approximately one-sixth of cases of AMI [20], although the presentation is more often subacute than with arterial occlusions. The degree to which intestinal perfusion is affected depends on the location, extent, and speed of thrombus formation. The SMV, splenic vein, and portal vein are frequently involved, whereas IMV thrombosis is rare [61]. Thrombosis of small peripheral veins is more likely to cause ischemia than isolated portal vein or SMV thrombosis, which is more frequently subclinical and presents with complications of portal hypertension from chronic venous thrombosis [61]. Conditions predisposing to mesenteric venous thrombosis include inherited and acquired hypercoagulable states (including thrombophilia, primary or metastatic malignancy, and oral contraceptive use), direct venous injury (such as from pancreatitis, abdominal trauma, or iatrogenic), and local venous stasis or congestion [20]. Other associations include extramesenteric venous thromboembolic disease (concurrent or prior) and morbid obesity [20]. Still, 10–49% of cases are idiopathic [61, 62].
The venous occlusion is identified as a tubular hypodensity along the expected course of a mesenteric vein (Fig. 15). The vein lumen is often expanded. MDCT findings of ischemia from mesenteric venous thrombosis will frequently include wall thickening and luminal distension, thickened and hazy mesentery, ill-defined bowel wall margins, and ascites due to venous congestion (Fig. 16) [61]. Hyperdensity of venous segments can be seen with venous thrombosis on noncontrast MDCT, with greater sensitivity and diagnostic confidence when narrow windows are used [63].
If the patient demonstrates peritoneal signs on exam, laparotomy should be performed and infarcted bowel resected. Goals of treatment otherwise include prevention of new or worsening intestinal ischemia with immediate heparinization and possibly thrombectomy [64] or transcatheter thrombolytics [64, 65] (although thrombolytics should be avoided if intestinal infarction is present). Also, long-term anticoagulation is initiated if any underlying hypercoagulable condition is diagnosed.
Mesenteric venous thrombosis or thrombophlebitis may rarely complicate acute inflammatory conditions of the bowel, including appendicitis and diverticulitis (Fig. 17) [66, 67]. In such cases, it may be difficult to differentiate thrombosis-related bowel ischemia from thrombus-inducing bowel inflammation, both of which may have bowel wall thickening, adjacent fat stranding, and mucosal hyperenhancement. Thrombophlebitis of the portal system (also known as pylephlebitis) is differentiated from bland thrombosis by ring enhancement of the vein wall, gas in or adjacent to the thrombus, and intrahepatic seeding and abscess formation [67].
Conclusion
AMI is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition in which the radiologist plays a key diagnostic role. CTA and venous phase abdominal MDCT can often differentiate the various etiologies of AMI and appropriately triage the patient to surgical or endovascular therapies, if indicated. Embolic obstruction of the SMA is the most common cause of AMI and should prompt evaluation for a cardiogenic source. In situ arterial thrombosis typically complicates severe atherosclerotic ostial disease, and symptomatic disease is usually accompanied by critical stenosis of celiac and/or IMA. NOMI is common in critically ill patients and should be considered when MDCT findings of ischemia are detected in this at-risk population. Some of the classic angiographic findings may be detectable on CTA. Dissection, volvulus, mesenteric vascular trauma, and vasculitis are uncommon causes of AMI that are each treated differently and that can often be diagnosed confidently by MDCT. Porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis may occur in hypercoagulable patients or as a complication of abdominal inflammatory processes.
References
Brandt LJ, Boley SJ (2000) AGA technical review on intestinal ischemia. Gastroenterology 118:954–968. doi:10.1053/gg.2000.7031
Kougias P, Lau D, El Sayed HF, et al. (2007) Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 46(3):467–474. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.045
Yamada K, Saeki M, Yamaguchi T, et al. (1998) Acute mesenteric ischemia: CT and plain radiographic analysis of 26 cases. Clin Imaging 22:34–41
Yikilmaz A, Karahan OI, Senol S, Tuna IS, Akyildiz HY (2011) Value of multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Eur J Radiol 80(2):297–302. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.016
van den Heijkant TC, Aerts BA, Teijink JA, Buurman WA, Luyer MD (2013) Challenges in diagnosing mesenteric ischemia. World J Gastroenterol 19(9):1338–1341. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1338
Evennett NJ, Petrov MS, Mittal A, Windsor JA (2009) Systematic review and pooled estimates for the diagnostic accuracy of serological markers for intestinal ischemia. World J Surg 33(7):1374–1383. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0074-7
Gourley EJ, Gering SA (2005) The meandering mesenteric artery: a historic review and surgical implications. Dis Colon Rectum 48(5):996–1000. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0890-7
Walker TG (2009) Mesenteric vasculature and collateral pathways. Semin Interv Radiol 26(3):167–174. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1225663
Wiesner W, Khurana B, Ji H, Rox PR (2003) CT of acute bowel ischemia. Radiology 226:635–650. doi:10.1148/radiol.2263011540
Reilly PM, Wilkins KB, Fuh KC, Haglund U, Bulkley GB (2001) The mesenteric hemodynamic response to circulatory shock: an overview. Shock 15(5):329–343
Angelelli G, Scardapane A, Memeo M, Ianora AAS, Rotondo A (2004) Acute bowel ischemia: CT findings. Eur J Radiol 50:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.11.013
Oliva IB, Davarpanah AH, Rybicki FJ, et al. (2013) ACR Appropriateness criteria imaging of mesenteric ischemia. Abdom Imaging 38(4):714–719. doi:10.1007/s00261-012-9975-2
Barmase M, Kang M, Wig J, et al. (2011) Role of multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of suspected mesenteric ischemia. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e582–e587. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.015
Chou CK, Mak CW, Tzeng WS, Chang JM (2004) CT of small bowel ischemia. Abdom Imaging 29(1):18–22. doi:10.1007/s00261-003-0073-3
Kirkpatrick IDC, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM (2003) Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology 229:91–98. doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020991
Menke J (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 256(1):93–101. doi:10.1148/radiol.10091938
Blachar A, Barnes S, Adam SZ, et al. (2011) Radiologists’ performance in the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia, using MDCT and specific CT findings, using a variety of CT protocols. Emerg Radiol 18(5):385–394. doi:10.1007/s10140-011-0965-4
Wiesner W, Hauser A, Steinbrich W (2004) Accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute bowel ischemia in a non-selected study population. Eur Radiol 14(12):2347–2356. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2462-6
Potretzke TA, Brace CL, Lubner MG, et al. (2014) Early small-bowel ischemia: dual-energy CT improves conspicuity compared with conventional CT in a swine model. Radiology . doi:10.1148/radiol.14140875
Acosta S (2010) Epidemiology of mesenteric vascular disease: clinical implications. Semin Vasc Surg 23(1):4–8. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2009.12.001
Levine JS, Jacobson ED (1995) Intestinal ischemic disorders. Dig Dis 13(1):3–24
Wyers MC (2010) Acute mesenteric ischemia: diagnostic approach and surgical treatment. Semin Vasc Surg 23(1):9–20. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2009.12.002
Acosta S, Bjorck M (2014) Modern treatment of acute mesenteric ischaemia. Br J Surg 101(1):e100–e108. doi:10.1002/bjs.9330
Arthurs ZM, Titus J, Bannazadeh M, et al. (2011) A comparison of endovascular revascularization with traditional therapy for the treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 53(3):698–704 (discussion 704–695). doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.049
Garrett HE Jr (2014) Options for treatment of spontaneous mesenteric artery dissection. J Vasc Surg 59(5):1433–1439. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.040
Jung SC, Lee W, Park EA, et al. (2013) Spontaneous dissection of the splanchnic arteries: CT findings, treatment, and outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(1):219–225. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7877
Orihashi K, Sueda T, Okada K, Imai K (2005) Perioperative diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia in acute aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28(6):871–876. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.09.017
Apaydin AZ, Buket S, Posacioglu H, et al. (2002) Perioperative risk factors for mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 74:2034–2039
Chao CP (2009) Segmental arterial mediolysis. Semin Interv Radiol 26(3):224–232. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1225666
Millet I, Taourel P, Ruyer A, Molinari N (2015) Value of CT findings to predict surgical ischemia in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25(6):1823–1835. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3440-2
Geffroy Y, Boulay-Coletta I, Julles MC, et al. (2014) Increased unenhanced bowel-wall attenuation at multidetector CT is highly specific of ischemia complicating small-bowel obstruction. Radiology 270(1):159–167
Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, et al. (1992) Closed-loop and strangulated intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 185:769–775. doi:10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438761
Khurana B (2003) The whirl sign. Radiology 226:69–70. doi:10.1148/radiol.2261011392
Duda JB, Bhatt S, Dogra VS (2008) Utility of CT whirl sign in guiding management of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(3):743–747. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3386
Nakashima K, Ishimaru H, Fujimoto T, et al. (2014) Diagnostic performance of CT findings for bowel ischemia and necrosis in closed-loop small-bowel obstruction. Abdom Imaging . doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0335-2
Ho YC (2012) “Venous cut-off sign” as an adjunct to the “whirl sign” in recognizing acute small bowel volvulus via CT scan. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):2005–2006. doi:10.1007/s11605-012-1910-x
Matolo NM, Albo D (1971) Gastrointestinal complications of collagen vascular diseases: surgical implications. Am J Surg 122:678–682
Nastri MV, Baptista LPS, Baroni RH, et al. (2004) Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of Takayasu Arteritis. Radiographics 24:773–786. doi:10.1148/rg.243035096
Rits Y, Oderich GS, Bower TC, et al. (2010) Interventions for mesenteric vasculitis. J Vasc Surg 51(2):392–400. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.082
Kobayashi M, Kurose K, Kobata T, et al. (2003) Ischemic intestinal involvement in a patient with Buerger disease: case report and literature review. J Vasc Surg 38(1):170–174. doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(02)75469-4
Barile-Fabris L, Hernandez-Cabrera MF, Barragan-Garfias JA (2014) Vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Rheumatol Rep 16(9):440. doi:10.1007/s11926-014-0440-9
Ha HK, Lee SH, Rha SE, et al. (2000) Radiologic features of vasculitis involving the gastrointestinal tract. Radiographics 20:779–794. doi:10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00mc02779
Krupski WC, Selzman CH, Whitehill TA (1997) Unusual causes of mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin N Am 77(2):471–502
Chang WL, Yang YH, Lin YT, Chiang BL (2004) Gastrointestinal manifestations in Henoch–Schönlein purpura: a review of 261 patients. Acta Paediatr 93(11):1427–1431. doi:10.1080/08035250410020181
Grayson PC, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Clark TM, et al. (2012) Distribution of arterial lesions in Takayasu’s arteritis and giant cell arteritis. Ann the Rheum Dis 71(8):1329–1334. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200795
Pillai AK, Iqbal SI, Liu RW, Rachamreddy N, Kalva SP (2014) Segmental arterial mediolysis. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(3):604–612. doi:10.1007/s00270-014-0859-4
Asensio JA, Berne JD, Chahwan S, et al. (1999) Traumatic injury to the superior mesenteric artery. Am J Surg 178:235–239
Fullen WD, Hunt J, Altemeier WA (1972) The clinical spectrum of penetrating injury to the superior mesenteric arterial circulation. J Trauma 12(8):656–664
Asensio JA, Britt LD, Borzotta A, et al. (2001) Multiinstitutional experience with the management of superior mesenteric artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg 193(4):354–365
Courcy PA, Brotman S, Oster-Granite ML, et al. (1984) Superior mesenteric artery and vein injuries from blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 24(9):843–845
Paul JS, Webb TP, Aprahamian C, Weigelt JA (2010) Intraabdominal vascular injury: are we getting any better? J Trauma 69(6):1393–1397. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e49045
Atri M, Hanson JM, Grinblat L, et al. (2008) Surgically important bowel and/or mesenteric injury in blunt trauma: accuracy of multidetector CT for evaluation. Radiology 249(2):524–533. doi:10.1148/radiol.2492072055
Yu J, Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Cockrell C, Halvorsen RA (2011) Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: MDCT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 36(1):50–61. doi:10.1007/s00261-009-9593-9
Saba L, Mallarini G (2008) Computed tomographic imaging findings of bowel ischemia. J Comp Assist Tomog 32(3):329–340. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3180dc8cb1
Ceppa EP, Fuh KC, Bulkley GB (2003) Mesenteric hemodynamic response to circulatory shock. Curr Opin Crit Care 9:127–132
Krejci V, Hiltebrand LB, Sigurdsson GH (2006) Effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine on microcirculatory blood flow in the gastrointestinal tract in sepsis. Crit Care Med 34(5):1456–1463. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000215834.48023.57
Siegelman SS, Sprayregen S, Boley SJ (1974) Angiographic diagnosis of mesenteric arterial vasoconstriction. Radiology 112:533–542. doi:10.1148/112.3.533
Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, Vestring T, Reimer P (2002) Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy. Eur Radiol 12(5):1179–1187. doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1220-2
Woodhams R, Nishimaki H, Fujii K, Kakita S, Hayakawa K (2010) Usefulness of multidetector-row CT (MDCT) for the diagnosis of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI): assessment of morphology and diameter of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) on multi-planar reconstructed (MPR) images. Eur J Radiol 76(1):96–102. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.012
Kwok HC, Dirkzwager I, Duncan DS, Gillham MJ, Milne DG (2014) The accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia in patients after cardiovascular surgery. Crit Care Resusc 16:90–95
Harnik IG, Brandt LJ (2010) Mesenteric venous thrombosis. Vasc Med 15(5):407–418. doi:10.1177/1358863X10379673
Oldenburg WA, Lau LL, Rodenberg TJ, Edmonds HJ, Burger CD (2004) Acute mesenteric ischemia. Arch Intern Med 164:1054–1062. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.10.1054
Goldstein M, Quen L, Jacks L, Jhaveri K (2012) Acute abdominal venous thromboses—the hyperdense CT sign. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:8–13
Kim HS, Patra A, Khan J, Arepally A, Streiff MB (2005) Transhepatic catheter-directed thrombectomy and thrombolysis of acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1685–1691. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000182156.71059.B7
Hollingshead M, Burke CT, Mauro MA, et al. (2005) Transcatheter thrombolytic therapy for acute mesenteric and portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:651–661. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000156265.79960.86
Balthazar EJ, Gollapudi P (2000) Septic thrombophlebitis of the mesenteric and portal veins: CT imaging. J Comp Assist Tomogr 24(5):755–760
Yu JS, Bennett WF, Bova JG (1993) CT of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis complicating periappendiceal abscess. J Comp Assist Tomog 17(2):309–312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandstrom, C.K., Ingraham, C.R., Monroe, E.J. et al. Beyond decreased bowel enhancement: acute abnormalities of the mesenteric and portal vasculature. Abdom Imaging 40, 2977–2992 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0498-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0498-5