Abstract
Imaging plays a central role in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer and helps guide treatment decisions. The purpose of this pictorial review is to describe magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) assessment of cervical cancer, including indications for imaging, important findings that may result in management change, as well as limitations of both modalities. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics cervical cancer staging system does not officially include imaging; however, the organization endorses the use of MR imaging and PET/CT in the management of patients with cervical cancer where these modalities are available. MR imaging provides the best visualization of the primary tumor and extent of soft tissue disease. PET/CT is recommended for assessment of nodal involvement, as well as distant metastases. Both MR imaging and PET/CT are used to follow patients post-treatment to assess for recurrence. This review focuses on the current MR imaging and PET/CT protocols, the utility of these modalities in assessing primary tumors and recurrences, with emphasis on imaging findings which change management and on imaging pitfalls to avoid. It is important to be familiar with the MR imaging and PET/CT appearance of the primary tumor and metastasis, as well as the imaging pitfalls, so that an accurate assessment of disease burden is made prior to treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Cervical cancer affects women in their 30s and 40s predominately and is one of the most common causes of cancer death in women 35 years and younger [1–5]. Worldwide, over 500,000 cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed each year and seventy percent of cases occur in underdeveloped countries. There is a marked discrepancy in disease survival between developed and underdeveloped countries [3]. In sub-Sahara Africa, 65% of women with cervical cancer die of their disease, whereas 38% of women die due to cervical cancer in developed regions [1, 6]. The regional differences in survival are in part due to access to surgeons, radiation oncologists, and contemporary imaging modalities to diagnose, stage, and guide treatment of women with cervical cancer.
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) are advanced imaging techniques which are used routinely in the staging and treatment monitoring of cervical cancer [7–15]. The goals of this pictorial review are to discuss the appropriate use of PET/CT and MR imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer, the imaging findings which guide treatment, and important pitfalls to avoid on PET/CT and MR imaging. Crafting a radiology report, which includes the imaging features which are important to the decision-making process, will assure the treatment plan is tailored to maximize the clinical outcome in women with cervical cancer.
Treatment of cervical cancer
Accurate determination of the extent of disease at the time of diagnosis is critical in establishing the appropriate treatment for a patient with cervical cancer (Fig. 1). Palliative care is recommended for women with distant metastatic spread. Treatment options for non-metastatic cervical cancer generally include surgical resection for early stage disease (Stage IIA or less) and radiation therapy typically delivered with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced (Stage IIB or greater) or otherwise high-risk disease (imaging positive lymph nodes). At some centers, chemoradiotherapy rather than surgery is used as the primary treatment modality for women with early stage disease (IB2 and IIA) when there is a large tumor (> 4 cm). A general principle of therapy is to avoid utilizing both surgery and chemoradiation therapy for a particular patient, to limit the morbidity of treatment [16]. Advanced imaging techniques are therefore extremely valuable in triaging patients to surgery versus primary chemoradiation therapy based on such features as large tumor size (> 4 cm), clinically occult parametrial invasion, and lymph node involvement [17, 18]. Identification of pelvic and peri-aortic lymphadenopathy prior to initiating primary chemoradiotherapy is also critical, to ensure that the radiation treatment volume encompasses clinically involved and high-risk areas.
MR imaging in the assessment of cervical cancer: staging and treatment decision
The current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging system remains a clinical staging system based on clinical gynecological examination, with the addition of an exam under anesthesia, cystoscopy, and endoscopy as clinically indicated [4, 19–21]. This system remains in place because cervical carcinoma is most prevalent in developing countries, where imaging resources are limited. However, clinical staging is most accurate in early stage disease, with approximately 85% accuracy in Stage IA to IB1. Beyond these early stages, clinical staging diminishes in accuracy to less than 35% in Stage IIA and 21% in Stage IIB (Fig. 2) [22]. Conversely, MR imaging has accuracy rates approaching 95% for stage IB or greater and is considered the single best modality by which to assess tumor size, location, and extension into the surrounding tissues [21, 23–28]. Due to the inaccuracies of clinical staging alone, FIGO recognizes the added utility of MR imaging. FIGO encourages the use of MR imaging, where available, in staging women with cervical cancer prior to definitive treatment and accepts MR imaging as a replacement of more invasive techniques such as cystoscopy and endoscopy for the evaluation of tumor extent to the bladder and rectum [8, 9, 11, 21, 22, 24–30].
When cervical cancer is first diagnosed, the role of MR imaging is to access tumor size, location, extent of invasion into adjacent structures and metastatic foci, including enlarged lymph nodes in the pelvis. MR imaging is used initially to decide the definitive first-line treatment (Fig. 1). Surgical resection is considered if the cervical tumor is confined to the cervix/upper vagina [4, 13, 25, 30–33]. Once the tumor extends beyond the cervix and upper vagina to involve the parametrium or lower vagina, it is considered a locally advanced disease (≥IIB), and chemotherapy-sensitized radiation therapy is the first-line treatment. At some centers, stage IB2 and stage IIA are also treated with chemoradiation therapy [5, 21, 22, 28, 34]. MR imaging is also able to assess for lymph node metastasis with sensitivities up to 73% and specificities up to 96% [7, 25, 31, 33, 35–38]. Following initial definitive treatment, MR imaging may be used to guide brachytherapy, assess response to radiation treatment regimens, and to assess for recurrence following surgical resection or completion of the radiation treatments [5, 24, 39–43]. In the research arena, multi-parametric MR imaging is being used as a predictor of treatment response and prognosis, including disease-free survival and overall survival [5, 42, 44–50].
MR imaging protocol
Preparing patients for MR imaging studies includes fasting for 4–6 h prior to the examination. Small amounts of water with medications are allowed. At our institution, we do not administer an anti-peristaltic agent; however, some institutions do administer these agents prior to the exam to minimize bowel motion artifact. Immediately prior to imaging, gel is inserted into the vagina to improve visualization of the cervix. The patients are also instructed to void in order to minimize possible bladder-related artifacts. A comprehensive cervical cancer protocol should include the following sequences: pre-contrast axial T1-weighted images, axial and sagittal T2-weighted images, dynamic contrast-enhanced axial and sagittal T1-weighted images, and diffusion-weighted (DW) images; an example protocol is detailed in Table 1. Torso or cardiac coils are used for imaging the pelvis at many institutions, although dedicated pelvic coils can be used as well. Imaging can be performed on both 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla magnets.
MR imaging image analysis
Image analysis is performed on a dedicated digital image reading work station. The T2-weighted and DW images are the workhorse for evaluating the location, size, and extent of the primary tumor (Fig. 3). DW imaging is particularly useful when the tumor is small and difficult to visualize on the T2-weighted images or in a young patient where the cervical stroma is isointense and similar to cervical tumor signal [34, 50]. Post-contrast images do not improve the overall accuracy of staging compared to T2-weighted images alone; however, they are helpful in larger tumors, particularly when bladder, rectal, adnexal, or pelvic side wall invasion is suspected [21, 34, 49, 51].
Lymph nodes assessment on MR imaging is performed utilizing fat-saturated T2-weighted, DW, and T1-weighted post-contrast images. On the T2-weighted images, abnormal lymph nodes may be enlarged and can be seen as homogeneously hyperintense against the dark fat-saturated background or may be heterogeneous in signal, depending on the amount of necrosis in the lymph node tissue. On non-fat-saturated T2-weighted images, the lymph nodes will be similar in intensity to the primary tumor, and stand out from the bright surrounding body fat (Fig. 4a). On T1-weighted post-contrast images, lymph nodes may be enlarged and have variable enhancement depending on the amount of necrosis in the lymph node (Fig. 4b). On DW images, metastatic lymph nodes are iso- to hyperintense on the lower B-value, become higher in signal on the higher B-value, and are dark on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map (Fig. 4c). Lymph node metastases have been shown to have significantly decreased ADC values when compared to benign lymph nodes, and abnormal nodes as small as 5 mm may be detected with DW imaging [35, 52]. However, some investigators have noted some metastatic lymph nodes will not exhibit restricted diffusion [21, 22, 34].
PET/CT in the assessment of cervical cancer: staging and treatment decision
PET/CT is utilized pre-treatment when there is potential for tumor spread beyond the cervix or in patients who are being considered for trachelectomy [13–15, 53]. The goals of PET/CT imaging are to assess the number and location of suspicious lymph nodes and to detect any metastatic soft tissue deposits [10, 13, 14, 32, 38, 54–56]. The reported PET sensitivity for lymph node detection ranges from 79% to 91%, and the specificity ranges from 93% to 100% [14, 37, 55, 56]. PET/CT has a potential advantage of incorporating the functional, metabolic PET data with the spatial resolution of CT; however, microscopic metastases may still be missed.
PET/CT plays a complementary role to MR imaging in the evaluation of local extent of disease and can be helpful in delineating the margins of an invasive tumor in cases of superior tumor extension into the uterine cavity and caudal extension into the vaginal cuff [7, 9, 13–15, 32, 34]. Although the primary tumor in the cervix will avidly uptake FDG and the tumor can be localized on PET/CT, the intense activity can exaggerate tumor extension into the parametrial tissues, as well as bladder and rectal involvement (Fig. 5). MR imaging should be used in conjunction with PET/CT to avoid overestimating local invasion into the parametrium, bladder, and rectum [21]. The reported sensitivity of MR imaging in the evaluation of bladder and rectal invasion is 71–100%, with a specificity of 88–91%, and a negative predictive value of MR imaging approaching 100% [24]. Therefore, invasive cystoscopic or endoscopic staging is no longer necessary and rarely used [8, 9, 24].
It is important to note that lymph node status is not part of the official FIGO 2009 staging system as lymph nodes cannot be determined on clinical examination. However, lymph node status is important in the treatment planning algorithm and an important predictor of outcome [5, 21, 23, 24, 27, 57]. Five-year survival for patients with early stage disease decreases from 95% in the absence of lymph node metastases to <80% if pelvic lymph node metastases are present and <40% % if there is metastasis to para-aortic lymph node (Table 2) [57].
PET/CT is also used to follow patients after radiation therapy to assess for treatment response and assess for recurrence in those with a complete response following initial treatment [13, 32, 58]. Overall, sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of recurrent disease have been reported as 90% and 76%, respectively [49]. PET/CT, similar to MR imaging, is being assessed as a functional imaging parameter to predict disease response and prognosis, including disease-free and overall survival [5, 13, 46].
PET/CT protocol
In order to prepare for a PET/CT, the patient ideally should fast for 4–6 h prior to the examination. Small amounts of water with medications are acceptable. For diabetic patients, we recommend no insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications for 6 h prior to the radiotracer injection, and the blood glucose level prior to examination should be less than 200 mg/mL. The F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose dose is calculated as (weight in kg) × 0.14 mCi/kg with a minimum dose of 10 mCi. The uptake period spans at least 45 min, and the duration is recorded such that the uptake period can be held constant for subsequent studies in the same patient. During the uptake period, patients should be kept warm (warm blankets if necessary) and as relaxed as possible. Patients are instructed to minimize all movements and empty their bladder at the end of the uptake period. A routine field-of-view for patients with cervical cancer includes the thighs through the skull base. First, the scout scans are obtained, followed by low-dose non-contrast CT images, and finally the PET scan (Table 3). PET scan time may be increased to optimize the image quality. Images are reviewed with the patient on the table and, if necessary, certain images may be repeated. All images are reconstructed with and without attenuation correction. Fused axial, sagittal and coronal, coronal PET/CT images, and maximum intensity projection (MIP) PET images are sent to the picture archiving and communication system (PACS).
PET/CT image analysis
Analysis of the images is performed on the workstations equipped with fusion imaging software. Initially, qualitative assessment for areas of increased metabolic uptake is performed based on provided images (Fig. 6). Semi-quantitative measurements using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) can be calculated by the following formula: SUVmax = tissue radioactivity concentration (mCi/mL)/(injected dose (mCi)/patient weight (g)). Because tumors demonstrate a range of increased metabolic activity with some of them being only mildly metabolic, strict cutoff SUVmax values for differentiating normal from abnormal uptake have not been established; however, values exceeding 2.5 are often considered suspicious when assessing for disease recurrence [59, 60]. On a pre-therapy scan, SUV max has been noted as a prognostic factor for lymph node involvement, treatment response, and overall prognosis [54, 60]. At many institutions, small (<1 cm in short axis) lymph nodes are not considered worrisome on MR imaging; however, if there is hypermetabolic activity in the lymph node on PET, it is considered worrisome for metastasis (Fig. 7). In general, caution has to be taken when evaluating small lesions (diameter of less than 2 times resolution of PET), because these lesions may demonstrate falsely decreased measured SUVmax values due to partial volume effect [61, 62]. For follow-up scans, SUVmax values for the primary lesion and metastatic lesions are reported with comparison to prior, with special attention paid to uptake time and any possible extravasation of the radiotracer, which could alter the calculated SUVmax values [61].
Fused PET/MR images in the assessment of cervical cancer: the future of cervical cancer imaging
The fusion of PET images with MR images is a new and emerging technology being used to evaluate cervical cancer patients. According to recent studies, the strengths of MR imaging in assessing local tumor extent, paired with the strengths of PET imaging in assessing lymph node metastasis, results in a synergistic effect on the accuracy of staging women with cervical cancer [63, 64]. The accuracy of fused PET/MR was 83.3% for tumor staging and 90% for detection of lymph node metastasis, compared to an accuracy of 53.5% and 90%, respectively, for PET/CT [63]. Furthermore, readers detected more metastatic lymph nodes on fused MR/PET than they did on PET/CT in a group of 79 patients with cervical cancer who underwent lymphadenectomy as part of their cancer treatment [64]. Investigators have noted that fused PET/MR images combine the individual advantages of both modalities, which has resulted in its superior performance in reader studies. Certainly, future work in this area and the clinical utilization of PET/MR scanners will increase the value of this new imaging technique in the staging and treatment of patients with cervical cancer.
Examples of PET/CT and MR imaging findings which affect treatment planning
Positive common iliac nodes, retroperitoneal nodes, or thoracic/cervical nodes
Lymph node status is an important prognostic factor and knowledge of extra-pelvic nodal involvement is critical for guiding the patient’s treatment [32, 54, 65]. Locally advanced cervical cancer (tumors which extend beyond the cervix) places the patient at an increased likelihood of a positive lymph node [32, 52] (Fig. 8). Notably, cervical cancers have two potential drainage pathways based on the location of the tumor. Tumors which are located more caudally, in the cervix/lower uterine segment, usually drain first to the pelvic lymph nodes and subsequently into the common iliac chain. Tumors which extend further into the uterus than the lower uterine segment can potentially drain directly into the common iliac lymph nodes, bypassing the pelvic lymph node basin entirely [66]. The potential for common iliac nodal involvement without pelvic nodal involvement is an important reason to obtain a PET/CT in conjunction with MR imaging prior to treatment planning [8, 10, 15, 57]. When imaging reveals suspicious common iliac and para-aortic lymph nodes, the radiation field must be expanded to include these regions. The presence of suspicious thoracic or cervical lymph nodes alters management as these patients are typically managed with palliative intent, rather than potentially curative surgery or chemoradiotherapy.
Positive pelvic lymph nodes in clinically early stage tumors
Early stage cervical cancers which are small (<4 cm) and confined to the cervix have a very low rate of lymph node metastasis. This is true in both low-risk histology cell types (squamous cell) and higher risk cell types (small cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and clear cell carcinoma) [67]. MR imaging and PET/CT can assess for unexpected lymph node spread prior to treatment planning (Fig. 9). The presence of positive lymph nodes increases the likelihood of recurrence and decreases the survival rate compared to women without lymph node metastasis [57]. From a treatment planning perspective, women with imaging positive lymph nodes are not considered surgical candidates, and chemoradiotherapy is recommended [67, 68].
Parametrial invasion
Parametrial invasion is sometimes difficult to appreciate clinically, and occasionally clinically Stage I and IIA tumors demonstrate parametrial invasion on MR imaging (Fig. 10). This upstages the patient to at least Stage IIB and changes the treatment from surgery to chemoradiation therapy. The reported sensitivities of MR imaging for detecting parametrial involvement of cervical cancer are greater than 90%, with specificities greater than 80% and negative predictive values as high as 94–100% with modern MR imaging sequences [21, 22, 27, 28]. However, in large tumors, MR imaging may overestimate parametrial invasion when compared with small tumors as a result of stromal edema caused by tumor compression or inflammation [24, 25]. Review of DW images may be helpful to avoid overestimating parametrial invasion. On PET/CT, the extent of hypermetabolic activity in the primary tumor can overestimate parametrial invasion. Overestimation of parametrial invasion on PET/CT is mainly due to the lower resolution of PET images, and MR images should be used to assess parametrial invasion more accurately [13, 15, 69].
PET/CT pitfalls: biodistribution and benign lesions
Biodistribution pitfalls: brown fat
An interpreting radiologists or nuclear medicine physician should be aware of potential pitfalls in PET/CT evaluation. One PET/CT pitfall frequently encountered is metabolic activity within brown fat on the PET images [70]. Brown fat activity can be relatively easily discerned from pathologic hypermetabolic activity by observing the distribution pattern and correlating with the CT. On CT, there will be fat without lymph nodes in the regions of FDG uptake (Fig. 11). At our institution, warm blankets are routinely used to prevent this phenomenon from happening. Additional measures, such as propranolol and/or anxiolytics, are used in selected cases. If there are no contraindications to beta blockers, one of the protocols used in our institution includes 20 mg of Propranolol orally 60 min prior to the FDG injection.
Biodistribution pitfall: physiologic metabolic activity in ovaries and endometrium
Increased FDG uptake in the ovaries and endometrium can be seen at various points during the menstrual cycle [71]. Unilateral or bilateral ovarian FDG uptake may be seen in pre-menopausal female patients during follicular development, but in some women it can be seen throughout the menstrual cycle. Any FDG activity in the uterus and adnexa should correlate with the anatomical structures on MR images. Care must be taken not to mistake uptake in bilateral pathologic lymph nodes as normal ovaries (Fig. 12). On the other end of the spectrum, mistakenly diagnosing metastatic disease when normal ovaries account for the FDG uptake can be avoided by identifying an ovary containing small follicles and dark stroma on the T2-weighted MR images (Fig. 13). Another potential pitfall is related to ovarian transposition, which is performed in young patients in order to protect the ovary from radiation therapy. A transposed ovary is placed above the pelvic brim and can be easily mistaken as an abdominal metastasis if the possibility of transposition is not kept in mind [72].
Biodistribution pitfall: urine activity
PET interpreters are well aware of high physiologic urine activity due to urinary excretion of the FDG [71]. Potential false-positive and false-negative results may occur due to focal urinary retention of FDG in a ureter, bladder diverticulum, pelvic kidney, and surgically constructed ileal conduit or neobladder [47]. In patients with a neobladder or ileal conduit, special care must be taken to ensure that all FDG activity is contained within these structures, so that a recurrence or pelvic metastasis is not missed. For example, in Fig. 14, a patient with a known ileal conduit for urinary diversion was seen to have “lobular” FDG uptake in the region below the expected ileal conduit, and a urine leak was suspected on the PET/CT examination. However, when the contrast-enhanced CT images were scrutinized, soft tissue due to tumor recurrence, rather than fluid, was found in the area of suspected urine leak.
Biodistribution pitfall: bowel activity
Bowel activity can be highly variable on PET and can be diffuse or focal in appearance. As with urinary activity, disease may be over- or underestimated. If there is very focal activity confined to a small segment of colon, correlation with CT for a mass or evaluation with CT colonography or optical colonoscopy can be performed [73, 74]. This was the case in Fig. 15 in a patient where a very focal area of intense FDG uptake was noted in the sigmoid colon, with relatively less FDG uptake in the remainder of the bowel. The patient was referred to colonoscopy, and a pre-cancerous adenomatous polyp was removed.
More diffuse or segmental FDG uptake is often normal. However, when there is relatively more FDG activity in a long segment of bowel relative to the remainder of the bowel, this should be correlated with history and presence of pain or bloating. Occasionally inflammatory conditions, particular post-radiation enterocolitis occur in patients with cervical cancer (Fig. 16).
Benign lesions: leiomyomas
Leiomyomas are very common and can be hypermetabolic on PET imaging. Care should be taken to assure FDG avid foci in the uterus are truly leiomyomas on the corresponding MR images, so not to miss multifocal cervical cancer (Fig. 17). On MR imaging, leiomyomas are well-defined, hypointense on T2-weighted images, and can contain associated large serpiginous flow voids on T2-weighted images, in contrast to cervical tumor which is isointense on T2-weighted images and do not contain large flow voids. Larger, degenerating leiomyomas may have an area of high signal on T2-weighted images (Fig. 18). Both leiomyomas and cervical cancer will enhance following contrast, sometimes heterogeneously. DW images may be helpful to differentiate leiomyomas from tumor, as cervical cancer will restrict diffusion, while most leiomyomas will not. However, occasionally leiomyomas do restrict diffusion and the T2-weighted appearance should be relied upon to confirm the presence of a leiomyoma [75, 76].
Benign lesions: Incidental inflammatory/infectious lesions
Infectious and inflammatory processes result in FDG uptake; therefore, it is critical to consider the clinical picture to avoid misdiagnosing a neoplasm. Physical examination may also be of benefit in certain circumstances particularly for hypermetabolic lesions in the skin, mucosal pharyngeal space, or rectum. An example of the need to clinically correlate with physical examination is presented in Fig. 19. In this case, there was significant FDG uptake in the rectum, and recurrence in this region was questioned based on the PET/CT images. Corresponding MR images of this region demonstrated only normal anatomical structures. Ultimately, physical examination was performed and an inflamed hemorrhoid was present accounting for the FDG uptake on the PET/CT examination.
PET/CT pitfalls: post-radiation inflammation
Local inflammation secondary to radiation
Post-therapy findings can often be challenging on imaging. In the setting of cervical cancer, there are often post-radiation changes in the region of the primary tumor [15, 59]. In order to decrease false-positive results, PET is often delayed for 8–12 weeks after the completion of radiation therapy to allow for the inflammatory response to subside [72]. However, increased metabolic activity due to residual inflammation may be seen on PET several months post-radiation and often poses a diagnostic dilemma. Biopsy may ultimately be required if the imaging remains indeterminate. Such was the case in Fig. 20, which depicts an area of persistent FDG uptake in the cervix in a patient with cervical cancer, many months after completion of radiation therapy. MR imaging did reveal an area “suspicious” for tumor. This patient was referred to biopsy for the findings on imaging, which only revealed necrotic tissue and inflammatory fibrosis. On a follow-up PET/CT 1 year later, the FDG uptake in the cervix resolved.
Osseous activity
Following radiation, bone marrow activity may be increased or decreased, focally or diffusely [77]. In the early post-radiation period, there may be increased FDG uptake matching the radiation port due to inflammatory changes in the region of treatment. Following chemotherapy, PET/CT examination may also reveal diffusely increased bone marrow activity (“stimulation”), which is most commonly seen in patients treated with colony stimulating factors for leukopenia. Decreased activity within the radiation port is usually delayed and less worrisome. This reflects functional suppression of the bone marrow due to its high sensitivity to radiation therapy.
In addition to radiation-induced changes in the bone marrow, pelvic radiation therapy for cervical cancer places the patient at increased risk for developing osteoporosis and insufficiency pelvic fractures. Both radio-osteonecrosis and insufficiency fracture can present either early or late and may be difficult to differentiate from recurrent/metastatic disease due to variable degrees of FDG uptake [72, 77, 78]. Typically, insufficiency fractures develop in the sacrum, pubic rami, or acetabulum [79]. In certain cases, serial follow-up exams or further evaluation with MR imaging may be necessary to definitively differentiate benign from malignant processes (Fig. 21).
MR imaging pitfalls
Limited visualization of lesions outside the pelvis
PET/CT is superior to MR imaging in evaluating for distant metastatic disease. PET should be used to avoid missing lesions on the edges of the field-of-view on MR imaging. In addition, scout MR images should be carefully scrutinized for any abnormalities. An example of the value of evaluating all imaging sequences, including the localizer images, is given in Fig. 22. In this case, there was an inconspicuous metastatic soft tissue lesion in the anterior left abdominal wall overlooked on the MR imaging examination. The FDG avid soft tissue metastasis was seen on the PET/CT examination, and in retrospect, this lesion was only visible on the localizer MR images.
MR imaging suspicious lesions may not be metabolically active on PET-CT
Not all suspicious lesions detected on MR necessarily represent active metastatic disease. If the lesion is not metabolically active on PET, an alternative diagnosis must be sought. For instance, indolent infectious or inflammatory processes may occur in patients treated with radiation therapy. Such was the case in Fig. 23, where there were new bone lesions in the right superior pubic ramus on the MR images in a patient one year after completion of chemoradiation therapy. Corresponding PET/CT images reveal no FDG uptake in the bone lesion. After further clinical work-up, these were diagnosed as indolent osteomyelitis. Eventually, these did progress to a more aggressive infection which involved the pelvic musculature and abscesses formation.
Conclusion
The diagnosis, management, and follow-up of cervical cancer have evolved to include MR imaging and PET/CT in regions of the world where these advanced imaging modalities are available. The information gained from imaging guides and at times alters the course of treatment a patient undergoes. Imaging is also used in the follow-up of cervical cancer patients to detect recurrence and determine the next line of treatment. Using contemporary imaging protocols and understanding the role MR imaging and PET/CT play in guiding management, as well as the potential pitfalls of these modalities, is imperative for the radiologist to render an interpretation that will assist the referring clinician as they formulate an optimal treatment plan for the patient.
References
Cancer Research UK (2012) Cervical cancer incidence statistics. http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/cervix/incidence/. Accessed 17 Aug 2014
http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa-cause-of-death-by-age-and-gender. Accessed 17 Aug 2014
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2013) WHO Press Release 12 Dec 2013. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2013/pdfs/pr223_E.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2014
Lea JS, Lin KS (2012) Cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 39:233–253
Barwick TD, Taylor A, Rockall A (2013) Functional Imaging to predict tumor response in locally advanced cervical cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 15:549–558
Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, et al. (2001) Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 358:781–786
Grigsby PW (2007) The contribution of new imaging techniques in staging cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 107:S10–S12
Amendola MA, Hricak H, Mitchell DG, et al. (2005) Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183. J of Clin Oncol 23:7454–7459
Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F, et al. (2006) Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 24:5687–5694
Chung HH, Kang KW, Cho JY, et al. (2010) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:156e1-5
Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi DS, et al. (2005) Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 23:9329–9337
Narayan K (2005) Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:573–582
Patel CN, Nazir SA, Khan Z, Gleeson FV, Bradley KM (2011) 18F-FDG PET/CT of cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 196:1225–1233
Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER (2005) FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97:183–191
Rockall AG, Cross S, Flanagan S, Moore E, Avril N (2012) The role of FDG-PET/CT in gynaecological cancers. Cancer Imaging 12:49–65
Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540
Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, et al. (2000) Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 18:1606–1613
Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, et al. (1999) A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 73:177–183
Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 105:107–108
Pecorelli S (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:103–104
Kido A, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Togashi K (2013) Advanced MRI in malignant neoplasms of the uterus. JMRI 37:249–264
Sala EA, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patient with gyne malignancies. Radiology 266:717–740
Freeman SJ, Aly AM, Kataoka MY, et al. (2012) The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging. Radiographics 32:1805–1827
Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, Lomas D (2007) MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix. AJR 188:1577–1587
Sheu MH, Chang CY, Wang JH, Yen MS (2001) Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls. Eur Radiol 11:1828–1833
Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, et al. (1989) Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 171:245–251
Koyama T, Tamai K, Togashi K (2007) Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium. Eur Radiol 17:2009–2019
Zand KR, Reinhold C, Abe H, et al. (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix. Cancer Imaging 7:69–76
Qin Y, Peng Z, Lou J, et al. (2009) Discrepancies between clinical staging and pathological findings of operable cervical carcinoma with stage IB-IIB: a retrospective analysis of 818 patients. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49:542–544
Lai CH, Yen TC, Ng KK (2010) Surgical and radiologic staging of cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:15–20
Bellomi M, Bonomo G, Landoni F, et al. (2005) Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma. Eur Radiol 15:2469–2474
Hori M, Kim T, Murakami T, et al. (2009) Uterine cervical carcinoma: preoperative staging with 3.0-T MR imaging–comparison with 1.5-T MR imaging. Radiology 251:96–104
Chung HH, Kang SB, Cho JY, et al. (2007) Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer? Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:370–375
Pandharipande PV, Choy G, del Carmen MG, et al. (2009) MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes. AJR 192:802–814
Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ, et al. (2008) Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:128–135
Chung HH, Kang KW, Cho JY, et al. (2010) Role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in preoperative lymph node detection of uterine cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(156):e151–e155
Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, et al. (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922
Park W, Park YJ, Huh SJ, et al. (2005) The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:260–264
Jeong YY, Kang HK, Chung TW, Seo JJ, Park JG (2003) Uterine cervical carcinoma after therapy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 23:969–981
Tanderup K, Georg D, Potter R, et al. (2010) Adaptive management of cervical cancer radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 20:121–129
Levy A, Caramella C, Chargar C, et al. (2011) Accuracy of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging and ADC Mapping in the evaluation of residual Cervical Carcinoma after radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol 123:110–115
Kim HS, Kim CK, Park BK, Huh SJ, Kim B (2013) Evaluation of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:187–193
Kuang F, Yan Z, Wang J, Rao Z (2014) The value of diffusion-weighted MRI to evaluate the response to radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 32:342–349
Somoye G, Harry V, Semple S, et al. (2012) Early diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging can predict survival in women with locally advanced cancer of the cervix treated with combined chemo-radiation. Eur Radiol 22:2319–2327
Levy A, Medjhoul A, Caramella C, et al. (2011) Interest of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in gynecological malignancies: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:1020–1027
Miccò M, Vargas HA, Burger IA, et al. (2014) Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol 83:1169–1176
Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM (2013) New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. Am J Roentgenol 200:249–260
Payne GS, Schmidt M, Morgan VA, et al. (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance diffusion and spectroscopy measurements as predictive biomarkers in stage 1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116:246–252
Punwani S (2011) Contrast enhanced MR imaging of female pelvic cancers: established methods and emerging applications. Eur J Radiol 78:2–11
Charles-Edwards E, Messiou C, Morgan VA, et al. (2008) Diffusion weighted imaging in cervical cancer with an endovaginal technique: potential value for improving tumor detection in stage Ia and Ib1 disease. Radiology 249:541–550
Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, et al. (1991) Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 181:95–106
Punwani S (2011) Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 78:21–29
Signorelli M, Guerra L, Montanelli L, et al. (2011) Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: is 18-FDG-PET/CT really effective in patients with early stage disease? Gynecol Oncol 123:236–240
Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F (2001) Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 19:3745–3749
Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, et al. (2006) Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 238:272–279
Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D, et al. (2001) Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 218:776–782
Sakuragi N (2007) Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 12:165–175
Ryu SY, Kim MH, Choi SC, Choi CW, Lee KH (2003) Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 44:347–352
Choi J, Kim HJ, Jeong YH, et al. (2014) The role of (18) F-FDG PET/CT in assessing therapy response in cervix cancer after concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:130–136
Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW (2007) The standardized uptake value for F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose is a sensitive predictive biomarker for cervical cancer treatment response and survival. Cancer 110:1738–1744
Weber WA (2005) Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med 46:983–995
Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I (2007) Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med 48:932–945
Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y, et al. (2014) Fusin of PET and MRI for staging of uterine cervical cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced (18)F-FDG PET/CT and pelvic MRI. Clin Imaging 38:464–469
Kim SK, Choi HJ, Park SY, et al. (2009) Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 45:2103–2109
Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, et al. (2010) Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol 28:2108–2113
Martínez A, Mery E, Filleron T, et al. (2013) Accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 130:525–529
Agarwal S, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, et al. (2011) Outcomes of patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer of high-risk histological subtypes. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:123–127
National Cancer Institute: NCI Clinical Announcement (1999) United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Son H, Kositwattanarerk A, Hayes MP, et al. (2010) PET/CT evaluation of cervical cancer: spectrum of disease. Radiographics 30:1251–1268
Evans KD, Tulloss TA, Hall N (2007) 18FDG uptake in brown fat: potential for false positives. Radiol Technol 78:361–366
Subhas N, Patel PV, Pannu HK, et al. (2005) Imaging of pelvic malignancies with in-line FDG PET-CT: case examples and common pitfalls of FDG PET. Radiographics 25:1031–1043
Ulaner GA, Lyall A (2013) Identifying and Distinguishing Treatment Effects and Complications from Malignancy at FDG PET/CT. Radiographics 33:1817–1834
Treglia G, Taralli S, Salsano M, et al. (2014) Prevalence and malignancy risk of focal colorectal incidental uptake detected by (18)F-FDG-PET or PET/CT: a meta-analysis. Radiol Oncol 48:99–104
Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R, et al. (2005) PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med 46:758–762
Sudderuddin S, Helbren E, Telesca M, Williamson R, Rockall A (2014) MRI appearances of benign uterine disease. Clin Radiol 69:1095–1104
Allen BC, Hosseinzadeh K, Qasem SA, Varner A, Leyendecker JR (2014) Practical approach to MRI of female pelvic masses. Am J Roentgenol 202:1366–1375
Fayad LM, Cohade C, Wahl RL, Fishman EK (2003) Sacral Fractures: A Potential Pitfall of FDG Positron Emission Tomography. American Journal of Roentgenology 181:1239–1243
Rolton DJ, Blagg SE, Hughes RJ (2011) Osteoradionecrosis of the lumbar spine 25 years after radiotherapy. J Bone Joint Surg 93:1279–1281
Salavati A, Shah V, Wang ZJ, et al. (2011) F-18 FDG PET/CT findings in postradiation pelvic insufficiency fracture. Clin Imaging 35:139–142
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kusmirek, J., Robbins, J., Allen, H. et al. PET/CT and MRI in the imaging assessment of cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging 40, 2486–2511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0363-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0363-6