Abstract
We report a case of a 70-year-old woman with a BMI of 58 who developed cellulitis refractory to treatment, within an area of massive localized lymphedema. Biopsy showed angiosarcoma. MRI showed multiple lobulated, low T1, high T2 masses within a background of prominent soft tissue septal stranding, dilated lymphatic channels, and skin thickening. CT also showed the mass well, within the background lymphedema. Massive localized lymphedema is increasing in prevalence due to the worsening obesity epidemic. Radiologists should be aware that the presence of a nodule within an area of massive localized lymphedema is suspicious for sarcoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Stewart–Treves syndrome is a rare malignant phenomenon in which angiosarcomas arise within the background of chronic lymphedema. This association was first recognized and most often seen in the setting of treated breast cancer [1,2,3]. Although most cases are seen in the upper arm after axillary node dissection, any area with chronic lymphedema is at risk of malignant change to sarcoma, perhaps due to the localized immunosuppression induced by the lymphedema [4]. In a recent case series of five patients presenting over a 25-year period, Shon et al. described the clinical and histologic findings of Stewart–Treves syndrome in the setting of the relatively newly described disorder, massive localized lymphedema (MLL) [5]. MLL is a disorder of localized lymphedema forming a pedunculated mass, most commonly in the upper medial thigh of obese, postmenopausal females [6,7,8,9]. Four cases of angiosarcomas arising in the presence of severe obesity, without the classification of MLL, but presumed to be secondary to lymphatic dysfunction have also been reported [5, 10,11,12]. An increasing number of reports of MLL, and increasing variety in locations of the entity, may reflect increasing rates of morbid obesity [13,14,15]. In the original case series of angiosarcoma arising from MLL, patients presented with signs highly concerning for malignancy, such as dramatic weight loss. Imaging findings have not been previously reported. Here, we will present the MRI, CT, and pathology findings of a case of angiosarcoma arising in the background of MLL, in a patient who did not have any systemic signs of malignancy. This case is being presented to show the imaging findings of angiosarcoma superimposed on MLL. Given the rising prevalence of MLL, radiologists should be aware of the possibility of sarcomatous degeneration in MLL. Nodules are not a feature of MLL, and therefore the presence of a nodule within a region of MLL should raise concern for sarcoma. It is hoped that increased awareness may lead to the detection of future cases before they reach the large size seen in the case we report.
Case report
Our study was HIPAA-compliant and IRB-approved. The patient is a 70-year-old obese female (BMI 58) with a past medical history of chronic cellulitis, chronic bilateral lower extremity lymphedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypothyroidism, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. She had a 2-year history of a growing mass in her inner thigh. A week before presentation, she reported that she developed an ulcer in this region and her upper thigh became erythematous, tender, and produced significant amounts of malodorous, serosanguinous discharge. She presented to an outside facility in sepsis, presumed secondary to cellulitis. Cultures from her cellulitis grew Serratia marcescens and appropriate antibiotics were started. Several days later, due to depth of the wound, the lack of improvement after treatment with antibiotics and debridement, and her history of increasing size of the thigh, the decision was made to perform an open incisional biopsy deep to the area of ulceration. Biopsy revealed a neoplasm consistent with high-grade angiosarcoma (Fig. 1). At this point, she was transferred to our facility for further surgical oncologic care.
An MRI without contrast of the right thigh was performed on arrival. Intravenous contrast was not given because of the patient’s difficulty in lying flat for MRI. MRI (Fig. 2) showed a large, pedunculated fatty mass, characteristic of MLL, arising at the inner thigh. The skin was markedly thickened, and thick fascial bands were seen radiating centrally from the skin. A lobulated mass within this area measured 11 cm and showed low T1, high T2 signal intensity. Other smaller, satellite masses were present within the area of MLL, and there was an additional mass which lay beyond the area of lymphedema, consistent with local metastasis. Right inguinal enlarged lymph nodes were seen and were concerning for nodal metastasis. CT scan revealed hyperdense tumor underlying a large skin ulceration, in a background of edematous fat (Fig. 3). CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed no evidence of metastatic disease. Due to the poor health of the patient, the oncology teams felt chemotherapy was not an option, and the patient was not a good candidate for invasive surgery; treatment therefore was palliative local radiation and comfort care. The patient returned home and was lost to follow-up.
Discussion
MLL is a rare disorder first described in 1998 by Farshid and Weiss [16]. They published 14 cases of large, benign masses simulating well-differentiated liposarcomas in a portion of their morbidly obese patients. The average BMI of the patients in their study was 59.6 kg/m2, and so it was suggested that obesity and associated complications such as metabolic syndrome are the most significant risk factors for developing MLL. Other proposed risk factors include hypothyroidism, weight loss secondary to bariatric surgery, inguinal hernia repairs, and hemiparesis [17, 18]. The lesions tend to be pendulous masses located on the proximal and medial portions of limbs, with a particular predilection for the upper, medial thigh [13, 16]. Since the initial description, several other case studies have reported MLL in other locations including the popliteal fossa, penis, inguinoscrotal area, vulva, mons pubis, retroperitoneum, and the lower abdominal wall [13, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Grossly, the lesions are edematous-appearing fatty masses with epidermal thickening and “peau d’orange” changes. Patients may present with recurrent cellulitis [5,6,7,8,9, 13, 24]. Microscopically, dermal expansion and fibrosis are present with fibrous bands interwoven into the surrounding fatty tissue creating coarse, discrete nodules of adipose tissue [5, 13]. MR appearance reflects the microscopic findings of dermal fibrosis, lymphangiectasia, and septations of adipose tissue separated by fibrous bands [7]. The areas of lymphedema show only mild enhancement after administration of gadolinium contrast. It is important to note that soft tissue nodules are not a feature of MLL either at pathologic examination or on imaging studies. The presence of nodules should alert the radiologist to the likelihood of neoplasm.
Despite the growing number of reports and awareness of MLL, the disease may be underreported [6, 16]. MLL may be mistaken for simple lymphedema, well-differentiated liposarcoma, or adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease) due to multiple shared features. On histologic examination, MLL and well-differentiated liposarcoma both show nodules of mature fat septated by fibrous bands, but lymphedema is not a finding of well-differentiated liposarcoma, and MLL lacks the nuclear atypia and lipoblasts seen in well-differentiated liposarcoma [8]. Adiposis dolorosa occurs in the same clinical setting and location as MLL and has a similar appearance but is characterized by painful lipomas as well as lymphedema. It may be considered as a variant manifestation of MLL [25, 26]. A suggested differentiating factor is increased prevalence of cellulitis and thickened epidermis in MLL compared to adiposis dolorosa, but either diagnosis may be argued for any individual case [6, 24].
MLL is not characterized by lymphadenopathy or by any focal mass. The presence of a mass in an area of MLL should be considered as likely to represent angiosarcoma. The imaging findings of angiosarcoma are not specific, however, and there could be other, coincidental tumors within an area of MLL.
To date, there are only five reported cases of angiosarcomas arising from MLL, four cases from chronic lymphedema, none arising from adiposis dolorosa, and an unknown number misdiagnosed as well-differentiated liposarcoma [5, 10,11,12]. The majority of the angiosarcomas reported grew as multiple satellite papules within the tumor of MLL, similar to the pattern of growth seen in our patient. It was characterized by anastomosing spaces lined by endothelial cells which stained positive for CD 31 and CD 34. CD 31 (cluster of differentiation 31) is a marker of endothelial cells, platelets, and monocytes. Similarly, CD 34 is found in hematopoietic cells and in the endothelial cells of blood vessels but not lymphatic vessels. D2 40 is a marker for lymphatic vessels; that was not employed because of the positivity of CD 31 and CD34. A point that remains unclear in the literature is the length of time between initial presentation of MLL and the discovery of angiosarcoma. In our patient, we have a 2-year timeline of overt growth of the MLL before diagnosis of high-grade stage III angiosarcoma was made, suggesting malignant change in MLL may occur in a matter of months rather than years. It is disturbing that all reported cases of angiosarcoma in this setting have been stage III or IV. Because the true prevalence and rate of malignant change are not known, any patient with an enlarging area of MLL should perhaps be screened for sarcomas with MRI or ultrasound. The presence of a nodule should initiate a biopsy.
References
Stewart FW, Treves N. Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema; a report of six cases in elephantiasis chirurgica. Cancer. 1948;1(1):64–81.
Hamacher R, Podleska LE, Steinau HU, Bertram S. Secondary angiosarcoma : A fatal complication of chronic lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2019;(April:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25598.
Young RJ, Brown NJ, Reed MW, Hughes D, Woll PJ. Review angiosarcoma. The Lancet. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70023-1.
Ruocco V, Schwartz R, Ruocco E. Lymphedema: an immunologically vulnerable site for development of neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002:124–7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.120909.
Shon W, Ida CM, Boland JM, Rose PS, Folpe A. Cutaneous angiosarcoma arising in massive localized lymphedema of the morbidly obese : a report of five cases and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2011:560–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01703.x.
James R, Frcsc E, Frcsc CS. Massive localized lymphedema: a case series and literature review. Can J Plast Surg. 2011;19(3):30–1.
Khanna M, Naraghi AM, Salonen D, et al. Massive localised lymphoedema: clinical presentation and MR imaging characteristics. Skelet Radiol. 2011;40:647–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1080-4.
Porrino J, Walsh J. Science Direct Massive localized lymphedema of the thigh mimicking liposarcoma. Radiol Case Reports. 2016;11(4):391–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2016.08.009.
Wang NS, Walters RF, Warren SJ. Massive localized lymphedema : a soft tissue process that may present to dermatologists. Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32(4):380–3.
Salas S, Stock N, Stoeckle E, Kind M, Bui B, Coindre J. Chronic lymphedema due to morbid obesity: an exceptional cause of abdominal wall angiosarcoma. Virchows Arch. 2008;453:217–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-008-0623-8.
Shavit E, Alavi A, Limacher JJ, Sibbald RG. Angiosarcoma complicating lower leg elephantiasis in a male patient: an unusual clinical complication, case report and literature review. SAGE Open Med Case Reports. 2018;6:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18796343.
Azam M, Saboorian MH, Bieligk S, Smith T, Molberg K. Cutaneous angiosarcoma complicating morbid obesity. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:531–3.
Kurt H, Arnold CA, Payne JE, Miller MJ, Skoracki RJ, Iwenofu OH. Massive localized lymphedema: a clinicopathologic study of 46 patients with an enrichment for multiplicity. Mod Pathol. 2015;29(1):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.135.
Baydar DE. Massive localized lymphedema in an unreported location (retroperitoneum). Diagn Pathol. 2018;13(89):1–4.
Saleem A, Hoffmann J, Warnke R, Longacre T, Rieger KE. Case report intralymphatic Rosai-Dorfman disease associated with vulvar lymphedema: a case report of an extremely rare phenomenon. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019;00:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000619.
Farshid G, Weiss S. Massive localized lymphedema in the morbidly obese: a histologically distinct reactive lesion simulating liposarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22(10):1277–83.
Manduch M, Oliveira A, Nascimento A, Folpe A. Massive localised lymphoedema: a clinicopathological study of 22 cases and review of the literature. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:808–11.
Wu D, Gibbs J, Corral D, Intengan M, Brooks JJ, Ath F 2000. Massive localized lymphedema: additional locations and association with hypothyroidism. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2000.17987.
Potti TA, Wuertzer SD, Lenchik L, Pacholke DA. Spectrum of fat-containing soft-tissue masses at MR imaging: the common, the uncommon, the characteristic, and the some. Radiographics. 2016;36(1):753–66.
Brewer M, Singh D. Massive localized lymphedema: review of an emerging problem and report of a complex case in the mons pubis. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(1):101–4.
Lobato RC, Zatz RF, Junior WC, et al. Case report – open accessSurgical treatment of a penoscrotal massive localized lymphedema: case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;59:84–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.022.
Fadare O, Brannan S, Arin-Salasi D, Parkash V. Localized lymphedema of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 2 cases and a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(3):306–13.
Lee S, Han JS, Ross HM, Epstein JI. Massive localized lymphedema of the male external genitalia : a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases. Hum Pathol. 2013;44(2):277–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2012.05.023.
Petscavage-thomas JM, Walker EA, Bernard SA, Bennett J. Imaging findings of adiposis dolorosa vs. massive localized lymphedema. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44:839–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2114-8.
Tins BJ, Matthews C, Haddaway M, et al. Adiposis dolorosa (Dercum’s disease): MRI and ultrasound appearances. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(10):1047–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.004.
Nai GA, Cristina T, Cordeiro P, Aparecida M, Morgado M. Dercum’s disease: a rare and underdiagnosed. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94(2):251–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyroff, S., Layfield, L.J. & Crim, J. Angiosarcoma arising in massive localized lymphedema. Skeletal Radiol 49, 815–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03373-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03373-4