Abstract
10-hydroxy-cis-12 octadecenoic acid (10-HOE) is a type of octadecenoic acid with a hydroxyl on the C10 carbon. It is generated from linoleic acid (LA) catalyzed by linoleate hydratase in lactobacilli, which was initially named as myosin-cross-reactive antigen (MCRA). In lactobacilli, 10-HOE is the first intermediate in the production of conjugated LA (CLA). Although MCRA from bifidobacteria can generate 10-HOE, the precise role of 10-HOE in CLA production in bifidobacteria remains unknown. In the current work, 10-HOE and LA were added to the medium as the substrate both separately and synchronously to analyze their influence on CLA production. Using 10-HOE as the substrate, bifidobacteria were able to generate CLA by first converting it to LA, followed by CLA accumulation. Recombinant MCRA catalyzed the conversion of 10-HOE to LA, indicating that bifidobacterial MCRA can account for the reversible conversion between LA and 10-HOE. This is the first report to demonstrate the precise role of 10-HOE in the process of CLA production among bifidobacteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid (LA) with conjugated double bonds (Yang et al. 2017a). Considerable research efforts have focused on CLA for its health-associated benefits, such as anti-carcinogenic, anti-obesity, and anti-inflammatory effects (Yang et al. 2015). cis9, trans11-CLA and trans10, cis12-CLA are the two major isomers reported to exhibit health-promoting activity.
A number of bacteria have been shown to possess CLA production ability, including Butyrivibrio, Propionibacterium, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium (Yang et al. 2017a). For Butyrivibrio, the dominant CLA isomer is cis9, trans11-CLA; however, the detailed characterization of linoleate isomserase is still unclear. LA isomerase has been purified from C. sporogenes ATCC 25762, characterized as a membrane-bound enzyme with a molecular weight of 45 kDa (Peng et al. 2007). LA was transformed to trans10, cis12-CLA by P. acnes via a one-step reaction catalyzed by polyunsaturated fatty acid isomerase, which was the first LA isomerase with this structure to be elucidated (Liavonchanka et al. 2006). Among lactobacilli, L. plantarum is the most extensively reported species with a high capacity to produce CLA, and its precise CLA-biosynthesis pathway has been clarified (Kishino et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2017b). LA was first hydrated into 10-HOE at the Δ9Z double bond, catalyzed by myosin-cross-reactive antigen (MCRA), a 64-kDa membrane-associated protein. Then, 10-HOE was dehydrated to 10-oxo-cis-12-octadecenoic acid followed by isomerization, hydrogenation, and dehydration, with CLA as the final product (Kishino et al. 2013; Yang et al., 2014). Furthermore, lactobacilli has been also reported to produce 10,13-hydroxystearic acid by a consecutive activity of two linoleate hydratases (Black et al. 2013).
MCRA is essentially a fatty acid hydratase first identified in Streptococcus pyogenes (Volkov et al. 2010). This protein is universal among bifidobacteria. The MCRA-coding gene from B. breve NCIMB 702258 was cloned and expressed in Lactobacoccus and Corynebacterium, and the recombinant protein was identified to be a FAD-dependent fatty acid hydratase (Rosberg-Cody et al. 2011). In addition, MCRA from B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 was reported to convert LA into 10-HOE (Yang et al. 2013). The MCRA from B. breve NCFB2258 was reported to be an oleate hydratase that played a role in stress tolerance, and knock-out of the mcra gene did not influence CLA generation (O’Connell et al. 2013). The precise role of 10-HOE in the CLA production process among bifidobacteria is still unknown.
In the current study, the relationships among LA, CLA, and 10-HOE were investigated to elucidate the role of 10-HOE in CLA production in bifidobacteria.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
LA and acetonitrile were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Marseilles) and J & K Scientific (Shanghai, China), respectively. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and are commercially available.
Microorganism cultivation
Twenty-nine bifidobacterial strains were used in this study and deposited at the Culture Collection of Food Microorganisms (CCFM), Jiangnan University. All of the strains were first cultured in mMRS broth (pH 6.5) composed of 1.0% tryptone, 1.0% meat extract, 0.5% yeast extract, 2.0% glucose, 0.1% Tween 80, 0.2% K2HPO4, 0.5% sodium acetate, 0.2% diammonium citrate, 0.02% MgSO4, and 0.05% l-cysteine at 37 °C anaerobically (Electrotek 400TG, West Yorkshire, UK). L. plantarum ST-III, a non-CLA producer isolated from pickles (Yang et al. 2013), was used for 10-HOE purification.
E. coli JM109 (DE3) carrying the plasmid pOXO4 with mcra cloned from B. breve NCIMB 702258 (Rosberg-Cody et al. 2011) was routinely cultured aerobically in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/mL tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/mL NaCl) at 37 °C in the presence of chloramphenical (25 μg/mL) as a selective marker.
10-HOE preparation
L. plantarum ST-III was first cultured twice in MRS broth and then cultured (2%) with 0.50 g/L LA, which was then cultivated at 37 °C for 72 h. The LA stock solution was prepared as previously described (Yang et al. 2017b). Fermented cultures were centrifuged at 8000g for 5 min at room temperature. Fatty acids from the supernatant were extracted using isopropanol and n-hexane (Yang et al. 2017b). The upper hexane level was vacuum-concentrated. After the fatty acid mixture was re-dissolved with acetonitrile, 10-HOE separation was carried out using a liquid chromatogram (Waters 2695, Milford, MA) fitted with a Cosmosil column (Ultimate® XB-C30; 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm; Welch, Shanghai Co., Ltd) with pure acetonitrile as the mobile phase. Samples of 200 μL were injected into the column at a flow rate of 5 mL/min and column pressure of 1200 psi. A UV-detector was used to monitor the whole sample-collection process at 205 nm. 10-HOE fractions were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to identify the purity. Purified 10-HOE fractions were then vacuum-concentrated and a 10-HOE stock solution was prepared by dissolving it in water with Tween-80 as the emulsifier.
Screening of bacterial CLA production by bifidobacteria
All of the tested strains were cultured (1%) in MRS broth including 0.05% (w/v) l-cysteine with LA (final concentration 0.5 mg/mL) or 10-HOE (final concentration 0.1 mg/mL) as the substrate. Following incubation for 72 h, the fatty acid profiles of all of the tested cultures were detected as described above.
Variation investigation of LA, CLA, and 10-HOE during bifidobacterial CLA-producing process
B. breve CCFM683, which is also deposited at China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center and the corresponding number is CGMCC 11828, and B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B were selected to investigate the role of 10-HOE in CLA-producing process. LA or 10-HOE was added as the substrate at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Cultures were sampled at 0 h, 5 h, 20 h, 48 h, and 72 h and the fatty acid of the supernatant was determined using GC-MS. Furthermore, LA and 10-HOE were synchronously used as the substrate, both at a concentration of about 0.05 mg/mL, and the fatty acid profile of the supernatant was evaluated.
LA production by E. coli JM109 (DE3) carrying plasmid pOXO4 with the mcra gene in the presence of 10-HOE
E. coli JM109 (DE3) harboring pOXO4-mcra was used to investigate the role of mcra-coding protein in transforming 10-HOE into LA. The strain was cultivated in LB medium with chloramphenicol added at 37 °C until OD600 reached 0.6. Isopropyl-beta-d-thiosulfan galactoside (IPTG) was then immediately added to a final concentration of 0.05 mmol/L and the culture was induced for protein expression at 18 °C for 10 h. pOXO4 vector-inserted E. coli JM109 (DE3) was used as a negative control. After induction, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000g for 5 min, washed twice with 20 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (KPB) (pH 6.5), and the cell pellets were stored at − 80 °C prior to use.
The reaction for activity assay was carried out in a screw tube containing 1 mL of the reaction mixture (20 mmol/L KPB, pH 6.5) with 5 mmol/L NADH and 0.1 mmol/L FAD as cofactors, 0.1 mg/mL 10-HOE complexed with Tween-80 as the substrate, and 50 μL of transformed E. coli suspension (0.5 mg/mL wet cells) as the catalyst. The reaction mixture was kept under microaerobic conditions in a sealed chamber filled with N2 and shaken (200 strokes/min) at 37 °C for 6 h.
Lipid analysis
Fatty acid extraction and methyl-esterification were carried out as previously described (Yang et al. 2013). Briefly, recovered fatty acid methyl esters with hexane were analyzed using GC (GC 2010 plus; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Massachusetts) fitted with a QP2010 ultra mass spectrometer using a 5-MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. with 0.25 μm thickness) (Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA). The column temperature was set initially at 180 °C for 3 min, and then increased to 190 °C in increments of 10 °C/min, and maintained for 3 min. Then, the column temperature was increased to 220 °C in increments of 5 °C/min and maintained for 1 min. Finally, the column temperature was increased to 230 °C in increments of 2 °C/min and maintained for 18 min. The injector and detector were operated at 240 °C. Electron energy of 70 eV and ion source temperature of 230 °C were used. Heptadecanoic acid was used as the internal standard.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were carried out in triplicate and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Student’s t test was used to determine the statistical differences. p values of < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
10-HOE purification and identification
As L. plantarum ST-III can convert 10-HOE from LA without producing other derivates, it was chosen to purify 10-HOE. The conversion rate of 10-HOE from LA by this strain was 20.2% (Fig. 1a). The purity of the collected 10-HOE was assessed as 100% by GC-MS (Fig. 1b). The qualitative measurement of LA and 10-HOE was based on its individual mass fragment. As reported in our previous studies, the typical mass fragment of linoleic acid was 81, 95, 107, 121, 135, 149, 262, and 294, while the mass fragment of 10-HOE was 133, 152, 169, and 201 (Fig. 1c and d). Ten liters of MRS medium containing LA-growing L. plantarum ST-III was cultivated for 72 h, and 0.81 g 10-HOE was obtained. The collected 10-HOE was used as the corresponding substrate in the following experiments.
Bifidobacterial CLA and 10-HOE production
To assess the CLA and 10-HOE production by bifidobacteria, 29 strains were examined. As shown in Table 1, only 23 strains converted LA into CLA to a certain extent, and the amount of CLA they produced varied widely, from 2.4% (for B. logum subsp. infantis CCFM687) to 85.9% (for B. breve CCFM683). Two B. adolescentis strains, CCFM743 and CCFM744, showed no CLA-producing ability. All of the tested strains also produced 10-HOE and the conversation rate ranged from 0.26 to 39.1%. B. pseudocatenulatum exhibited more efficient conversion of LA into 10-HOE (up to 39.1%) than other tested strains. Although B. adolescentis CCFM743 and CCFM742 could not convert LA into CLA, the 10-HOE conversion rate was 24.8% and 31.1%, respectively. In contrast, B. breve was identified to be the most efficient strain in CLA production, but the yield of 10-HOE was lower than 2%. These results suggest that CLA and 10-HOE could be converted from LA by bifidobacteria, but the conversion ability was strain-dependent.
10-HOE as the substrate to produce CLA
To analyze the role of 10-HOE in CLA production, all of the assessed strains were cultured in medium containing 10-HOE. The fatty acid analysis showed that CLA could be detected in 10 cultures. B. breve CCFM683 showed the highest conversion rate of up to 18.3% and another eight strains demonstrated conversion rates of less than 10%. Interestingly, LA could also be found in each culture (Table 2). B. longum subsp. longum CCFM642 produced the highest amount of LA with a conversion rate of up to 18.1%. These experimental results revealed that some bifidobacterial strains could also supply 10-HOE as the substrate to generate both CLA and LA.
LA acts as an intermediate during conversion of 10-HOE into CLA
To further examine the relationships among LA, CLA, and 10-HOE, B. breve CCFM683 and B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B were selected and LA, 10-HOE, or LA and 10-HOE were added as the substrate.
When LA was used as the substrate, CLA was first detected in cultures at 5 h. At this time, B. breve CCFM683 had converted nearly 50% of LA into CLA (Fig. 2a), whereas B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B had only transformed 12.5% (Fig. 2b). In contrast to LA, 10-HOE was markedly detected at 20 h rather than 5 h. At 20 h, the amount of 10-HOE had increased to 0.005 mg/mL for B. breve CCFM683 and to 0.003 mg/mL for B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B. Furthermore, cis9, trans11-CLA was the major isomer for both strains with a ratio of up to 52% for B. breve CCFM683 and 65.5% for B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B. Accordingly, the results clearly demonstrated that both strains could generate CLA and 10-HOE from LA, although they first accumulated CLA rather than 10-HOE.
Subsequently, 10-HOE was added to the medium as the substrate. Interestingly, LA could be observed earlier than CLA. At 5 h and 10 h, a significant amount of LA was found in the cultures growing both strains (Fig. 3), while no CLA could be detected. At this time interval, 10-HOE was only transformed into LA. At 10 h, the concentration of LA was 0.0113 mg/mL, but it decreased to 0.0085 mg/mL at 15 h. During this time, the concentration of CLA increased from 0 to 0.0025 mg/mL, while the amount of the 10-HOE remained unchanged. This result demonstrated that at this time, CLA was derived from the produced LA, not 10-HOE. In the following culturing time, we speculated that LA, CLA, and 10-HOE remained a dynamic balance. In contrast to the CLA isomer composition when LA was used as the substrate, trans9, trans11-CLA was the dominant isomer when 10-HOE was used as the substrate. At 72 h, the proportion of trans9, trans11-CLA in the total CLA was 77.2% for CCFM683 and 75.4% for MY45B. Based on these results and the findings using LA as the substrate, we hypothesized that LA probably acted as the intermediate when 10-HOE was transferred into CLA.
To further examine this hypothesis, we used a combination of LA and 10-HOE as the substrate (Fig. 4). For B. breve CCFM683, we found that LA decreased rapidly from 0.07 ± 0.0045 to 0.02 ± 0.0034 mg/mL while CLA increased to 0.04 ± 0.0049 mg/mL. However, the concentration of 10-HOE increased slightly from 0.0045 ± 0.0004 to 0.0047 ± 0.0001 mg/mL. Similarly, for B. pseudocatenulatum MY45B, the LA concentration decreased from 0.06 ± 0.0045 to 0.03 ± 0.0042 mg/mL, while CLA and 10-HOE increased to 0.02 ± 0.0041 mg/mL and 0.05 ± 0.0055 mg/mL, respectively.
Overall, our experimental evidence provides a solid basis for concluding that 10-HOE can be used as the substrate to generate CLA by bifidobacteria; however, LA acted as the intermediate in this case.
MCRA catalyzes the reversible reaction between LA and 10-HOE
MCRA has been identified as an oleate hydratase among B. breve, which controls the transformation of LA into 10-HOE. We speculated that this protein may also be involved in the conversion of 10-HOE into LA. To clarify our speculation, we generated one E. coli variant including plasmid pOXO4 inserted with a mcra gene cloned from B. breve NCIMB 702258. E. coli variant including the empty plasmid pOXO4 was adopted as the control in this experiment. The E. coli pellets induced by IPTG were used as the catalyst suspended in KPB (pH 6.5), and a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL of LA or 10-HOE complexed with Tween-80 was added to the reaction mixture. When LA was used as the substrate, 0.03 mg/mL of 10-HOE was detected in the medium, as shown in Fig. 5a, while 0.02 mg/mL of LA was produced when 10-HOE was added to the reaction solution as the substrate. These results provide solid evidence that MCRA was responsible for the reversible reaction between LA and 10-HOE among B. breve.
Discussion
Bacterial bio-transformation of LA into CLA may be a key step in the detoxification of free fatty acids by bacteria (Jiang et al. 1998). In the current study, we assessed the ability of 29 bifidobacteria to convert free LA into CLA. None of the B. adolescentis strains investigated converted LA into CLA at a detectable level, whereas all B. breve strains showed considerable CLA production ability. B. breve CCFM683, isolated from neonate feces, was the most efficient CLA producer, converting over 85% of LA into cis9, trans11-CLA and trans9, trans11-CLA. It has previously been reported that B. breve might be one of the most efficient CLA producers among bifidobacteria (Coakley et al. 2003).
Accompanied by CLA, 10-HOE was also transformed from LA at different levels by these strains. B. pseudocatenulatum was the most efficient producer of 10-HOE with a conversion rate of up to 39.1%. 10-HOE has also been generated from LA by a number of other bacteria, such as L. plantarum (Yang et al. 2017b), L. acidophilus (Ogawa et al. 2001), B. breve (O’Connell et al. 2013), and S. pyogenes (Volkov et al. 2010). In addition to 10-HOE, some L. plantarum can also convert LA into 13,10-dihydroxy octadecanoic acid, a fatty acid containing 18 carbon atoms with 2 hydroxyls on the C10 and C13 carbon atoms, respectively (Black et al. 2013).
Previous studies have reported 10-HOE as the key intermediate during CLA production by L. acidophilus (Ogawa et al. 2001) and L. plantarum (Yang et al. 2017b). In contrast, the role of 10-HOE produced by B. breve in CLA generation might be different from that of other lactobacilli (O’Connell et al. 2013). It was reported that a mutant of the mcra gene did not influence the level of CLA produced by B. breve NCIMB702258, suggesting that 10-HOE is not the intermediate during conversion of LA into CLA by B. breve. For lactobacilli, 10-HOE first accumulated to some extent, and was then converted to 10-oxo-cis-12-octadecenoic acid, 10-oxo-trans-11-octadecenoic acid, 10-hydroxy-trans-11-octadecenoic acid, and finally CLA (Kishino et al. 2013). However, the results of our study deepen our understanding of the role of 10-HOE in CLA production by B. breve and B. pseudocatenulatum. In this case, 10-HOE can be used as the substrate to produce CLA, but first, it seemed to be transformed into LA, as shown in Fig. 6. Furthermore, we found that the major CLA isomer was cis9, trans9-CLA, when LA was the substrate, and was trans9, trans11-CLA, when 10-HOE was the substrate. More studies should be carried out to explain this difference. Moreover, we also observed a reversion reaction between LA and 10-HOE in B. breve and B. pseudocatenulatum.
Previous studies have demonstrated that MCRA was also responsible for LA generation from 10-HOE by L. acidophilus (Kishino et al. 2013). Because the MCRA protein family has been identified to be highly conserved among different bacterial species (Volkov et al. 2010; Yang et al. 2013), we wondered whether MCRA from B. breve could also catalyze the reversible reaction between LA and 10-HOE. E. coli JM109 containing the mcra gene from B. breve NCIMB 702258 was used to clarify the role of MCRA in this reversible reaction. The results clearly revealed that the corresponding cell pellets could catalyze the reaction from 10-HOE to LA and from LA to 10-HOE, suggesting that MCRA accounted for the reversible transformation between LA and 10-HOE, which is clearly demonstrated in Fig. 6. Considering the highly conserved sequence of MCRA (Yang et al. 2013), we speculate that MCRA from other bifidobacterial species could also be responsible for the reversible reaction between LA and 10-HOE.
As far as we are aware, this is the first study to clarify the role of 10-HOE in CLA generation by bifidobacteria.
In conclusion, 10-HOE can be used as the substrate by bifidobacteria to produce CLA; however, in this case, LA acted as the intermediate during the transformation of 10-HOE into CLA, and MCRA was responsible for the reversible transformation between LA and 10-HOE.
References
Black BA, Sun C, Zhao YY, Ganzle MG, Curtis JM (2013) Antifungal lipids produced by lactobacilli and their structural identification by normal phase LC/atmospheric pressure photoionization-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem 61:5338–5346. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400932g
Coakley M, Ross RP, Nordgren M, Fitzgerald G, Devery R, Stanton C (2003) Conjugated linoleic acid biosynthesis by human-derived Bifidobacterium species. J Appl Microbiol 94:138–145. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01814.x
Jiang J, Bjorck L, Fonden R (1998) Production of conjugated linoleic acid by dairy starter cultures. J Appl Microbiol 85:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00481.x
Kishino S, Takeuchi M, Park SB, Hirata A, Kitamura N, Kunisawa J, Kiyono H, Iwamoto R, Isobe Y, Arita M, Arai H, Ueda K, Shima J, Takahashi S, Yokozeki K, Shimizu S, Ogawa J (2013) Polyunsaturated fatty acid saturation by gut lactic acid bacteria affecting host lipid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:17808–17813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312937110
Liavonchanka A, Hornung E, Feussner I, Rudolph MG (2006) Structure and mechanism of the Propionibacterium acnes polyunsaturated fatty acid isomerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2576–2581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510144103
O’Connell KJ, Motherway MOC, Hennessey AA, Brodhun F, Ross RP, Feussner I, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D (2013) Identification and characterization of an oleate hydratase-encoding gene from Bifidobacterium breve. Bioengineered 4:313–321. https://doi.org/10.4161/bioe.24159
Ogawa J, Matsumura K, Kishino S, Omura Y, Shimizu S (2001) Conjugated linoleic acid accumulation via 10-hydroxy-12 octadecenoic acid during microaerobic transformation of linoleic acid by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1246–1252. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.3.1246-1252.2001
Peng SS, Deng M-D, Grund AD, Rosson RA (2007) Purification and characterization of a membrane-bound linoleic acid isomerase from Clostridium sporogenes. Enzyme Microb Tech 40:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.06.020
Rosberg-Cody E, Liavonchanka A, Gobel C, Ross RP, O’Sullivan O, Fitzgerald GF, Feussner I, Stanton C (2011) Myosin-cross-reactive antigen (MCRA) protein from Bifidobacterium breve is a FAD-dependent fatty acid hydratase which has a function in stress protection. Biochem 12:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-12-9
Volkov A, Liavonchanka A, Kamneva O, Fiedler T, Goebel C, Kreikemeyer B, Feussner I (2010) Myosin cross-reactive antigen of Streptococcus pyogenes M49 encodes a fatty acid double bond hydratase that plays a role in oleic acid detoxification and bacterial virulence. J Biol Chem 285:10353–10361. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.081851
Yang B, Chen H, Song Y, Chen YQ, Zhang H, Chen W (2013) Myosin-cross-reactive antigens from four different lactic acid bacteria are fatty acid hydratases. Biotechnol Lett 35:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-012-1044-y
Yang B, Chen H, Gu Z, Tian F, Ross RP, Stanton C, Chen YQ, Chen W, Zhang H (2014) Synthesis of conjugated linoleic acid by the linoleate isomerase complex in food-derived lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol 117 (2):430-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12524
Yang B, Chen H, Stanton C, Ross RP, Zhang H, Chen YQ, Chen W (2015) Review of the roles of conjugated linoleic acid in health and disease. J Funct Foods 15:314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.050
Yang B, Gao H, Stanton C, Ross RP, Zhang H, Chen YQ, Chen H, Chen W (2017a) Bacterial conjugated linoleic acid production and their applications. Prog Lipid Res 68:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2017.09.002
Yang B, Qi H, Gu Z, Zhang H, Chen W, Chen H, Chen YQ (2017b) Characterization of the triple-component linoleic acid isomerase in Lactobacillus plantarum ZS2058 by genetic manipulation. J Appl Microbiol 123:1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13570
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31722041, 31801521, 31571810), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (nos. JUSRP51702A, JUSRP11733), the national first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology (JUFSTR20180102), and the Jiangsu Province “Collaborative Innovation Center for Food Safety and Quality Control,” the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_1763).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, H., Yang, B., Stanton, C. et al. Role of 10-hydroxy-cis-12-octadecenic acid in transforming linoleic acid into conjugated linoleic acid by bifidobacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103, 7151–7160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09886-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09886-w