Abstract
The approach to postmortem computed tomography (CT) differs significantly from that of diagnostic CT in living patients. Elimination of artifacts such as noise and beam hardening as well as optimization of tissue contrast requires alteration of exposure parameters from protocols designed to limit radiation dose in children. Multiple scans may be performed, and detailed post-processing can be used to enhance subtle findings such as small intracranial extra axial collections and non-displaced fractures. Basics of postmortem CT technique are discussed here as well as advanced techniques in scanning and post-processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Scanning technique for unenhanced forensic pediatric postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) should be designed to identify bone, soft tissue, and lung pathology; to detect hemorrhage and foreign bodies; and possibly even to aid in identification of remains and determination of cause of death. There are a number of reports that describe ways to optimize postmortem CT technique [1,2,3,4,5]. It is important to remember that the As-Low-As-Reasonably-Achievable (ALARA) principle applied to routine clinical imaging does not apply in the postmortem setting [1]. Strategies for the selection of imaging protocols discussed below incorporate parameters designed to reduce noise, improve spatial resolution, and reduce beam hardening artifact when necessary [1, 3, 6] in order to provide very high-resolution images to identify injuries or other pathology that may help differentiate suspected physical abuse from sudden unexplained infant death (SUDI), find undiagnosed pathology, or even disclose unknown congenital anomalies. Because the imaging data from these studies may be used to contribute to conviction or dismissal of a manslaughter charge, protect the pediatric siblings of the deceased, or form the basis of family counseling, even with regard to future pregnancies, attention to detail is paramount, and higher dose scans can be utilized to have the best opportunity for detection of abnormalities. Basic principles will be discussed here as well as an overview of newer techniques including dual-energy CT (DECT), ventilated PMCT, and postmortem CT angiography (PMCTA) with a brief discussion of post-processing options.
Basic technique
Optimization of image quality requires selection of scan protocol parameters for high tissue contrast, high spatial resolution, and minimal noise (Fig. 1). Tissue contrast varies with the beam energy (kVp) and tissue properties, and the scan kVp should be chosen accordingly, usually 120 kVp to balance noise, potential beam hardening, and tissue contrast [1, 4, 7]. Because postmortem scans are commonly performed without intravenous contrast material, attention to intrinsic soft tissue contrast is important. An additional consideration is metallic implants or foreign bodies that may create streak artifact with a lower beam energy. For example, supportive lines and tubes placed during resuscitative efforts should be left in place during at least the first scan for documentation of placement as well as to identify associated changes in the surrounding tissues [8] (Fig. 2); however, beam hardening from these devices can be an issue at lower beam energies. Reduced radiation dose is not a consideration in postmortem imaging and additional scans can be performed at a higher kVp setting to reduce beam hardening artifact as soft tissue contrast will be better demonstrated on the lower beam energy acquisition.
The reconstruction algorithm or kernel can be selected to emphasize different tissue characteristics, as well as alter noise appearance. For example, in creating a lung series, a moderately sharp contrast or even edge enhancement kernel may be selected to highlight fine detail (Fig. 3). A very sharp kernel may be useful for bone images but will result in increased noise artifact [2]. A smoother algorithm associated with decreased noise would be appropriate for brain and soft tissue viewing [1, 3, 4] (Fig. 4) as well as for reconstruction of data to be used to render 3-D (dimensional) images [3].
Spatial resolution will depend upon scanner type and detectors as well as scanning field of view (FOV), reconstructed FOV, matrix size, and slice reconstruction parameters and is influenced by noise and contrast. Helical, multidetector scanners are ideal for postmortem scanning [3] as they provide narrow detector collimation for small, reconstructed voxel size providing high spatial resolution [9] and eliminate artifact from axial scans (Fig. 5). Collimation width for pediatric PMCT is recommended to be less than 1 mm [1, 4, 5, 10, 11]. The rotations can be set to overlap resulting in a pitch of less than one, meaning the table moves less than the detector width for each 360° gantry rotation [1, 2, 4]. The overlap created by a low pitch prevents artifacts related to required data interpolation for a high pitch where the table moves more than the detector width for each gantry rotation. Both the overlapping exposure and a slow gantry rotation time of 1 s [2, 11] result in a higher effective tube current over the course of the scan, reducing noise and improving spatial resolution (Fig. 6).
Scanning FOV should be as small as patient body habitus and positioning allow to provide maximal spatial resolution. While some authors advocate a single scan of the whole body [5], others recommend scanning the head and neck and extremities with a smaller FOV in addition to a whole-body scan with a larger FOV to accommodate the body [1, 4], the latter technique is suitable for larger patients. The reconstructed FOV can be a different diameter from the scanned FOV. A smaller reconstructed FOV can be created from raw data to effectively assign less area to the XY (axial plane) matrix and decrease voxel size with increased in-plane resolution [2] (Fig. 7). The smaller FOV can be created off-center and is valuable for detailed evaluation of small parts such as facial bones, and extremities. Some scanners also permit reconstruction of an extended FOV for imaging of body parts not included within the standard FOV for large patients or patients with rigor mortis whose extremities may be fixed outside the scan. Caution regarding assessment of attenuation is needed as the Hounsfield units may vary outside the standard diameter [12].
Slice thickness reconstructions for image viewing will vary with patient size and region of interest [3]. For example, thinner slices may be desirable for facial bones, but unnecessary for abdominal soft tissues. In clinical, low-dose scanning, the increased noise associated with thin slice reconstructions may limit utility for viewing, but with the higher doses used for PMCT, thin slices may be desirable for decreased voxel size to limit volume averaging and windmill artifact [13]. Thin, sub-millimeter slices are best for artifact-free multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), volume rendered (VR) images, and storage in the event of later requests for additional reconstructions. Data can be reconstructed with an overlap permitting reconstruction of isometric voxels for optimal multiplanar reformatting and 3-D rendering without artifact [9, 14] (Fig. 8). Slice thickness cannot be reconstructed thinner than detector width, however, and so a narrow detector width is imperative.
Image noise directly affects both tissue contrast and spatial resolution. For PMCT, increasing the tube current above settings utilized in clinical scanning is an important strategy to minimize noise and improve both tissue contrast and spatial resolution (Figs. 1, 9, 10). To avoid an insufficient exposure, most authors recommend a fixed tube current [1, 4, 5] (Table 1). As discussed above, a narrow detector width is ideal for high spatial resolution, but the smaller detectors receive fewer photons which increases noise. By increasing tube current over clinical scan parameters, the noise associated with tight collimation is reduced. Iterative reconstruction is utilized in clinical imaging for noise reduction to allow decreased radiation dose. In PMCT, however, this strategy should be used with caution due to the potential for loss of detail and spatial resolution with a strong algorithm [2], particularly in assessment of subtle fractures.
Image reconstruction
Once scanning is complete, image reconstruction for viewing will be performed based on the needs of the specific case (Table 2). As discussed above, slice reconstruction for axial images and MPRs is performed with the slice thickness, kernel, degree of iterative reconstruction appropriate for body part, and tissue visualization (Fig. 11). Isometric voxels are required for smooth reconstructions performed in non-axial planes with overlapping slice data preferred to eliminate stair-step artifact [2, 4, 14, 15] (Figs. 11 and 12). For best viewing of high-resolution detail, such as temporal bone, lung parenchyma, or long bone metaphyses, reconstructions utilizing thin slices with a sharp kernel and a small reconstructed FOV will help improve spatial resolution. In addition to routine coronal and sagittal plane images, utilization of planes along the axes of the structure being evaluated, i.e., parallel to a long bone axis/perpendicular to the physis in the setting of potential metaphyseal lesions [4] (Fig. 13) or oblique, angled, or curved reconstruction along the ribs [14, 16], will aid in detection of pathology (Fig. 14). An extended Hounsfield unit scale is available for reconstruction on some scanners to aid in assessment of highly radiopaque structures [2], which can be viewed with reconstructed planes oriented to the object, or with a maximum intensity projection series. X-ray-like reconstructions consisting of large-volume MPR images or summated data that can simulate oral pan tomograms [8, 14, 17] may be useful in some circumstances. As discussed above, reconstructed, overlapping thin slice data with a smooth kernel should be utilized for 3-D volume rendering or cinematic rendering to eliminate stair-step artifacts and improve detection of surface abnormalities (Fig. 12). These types of reconstruction are highly useful for detection of linear, non-depressed skull fractures [18] and skeletal dysplasias [19] (Fig. 15). Cinematic rendering (Syngo Via, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) is a newer post-processing technology that provides more photorealistic, detailed 3-D images through utilization of information from high dynamic range rendering light maps. This process provides more natural illumination and more predicted photon scattering patterns resulting in improved depth and shape perception due to improved depiction of reflections and shadowing [19,20,21]. Cinematic rendering offers improved depiction of bone or surface abnormalities such as soft tissue lacerations or skeletal dysplasias [21] (Fig. 15).
Advanced techniques
Spectral decomposition performed through dual-energy scanning or photon counting can provide improved soft tissue contrast by utilizing the different attenuation values of different elements at different beam energies. For example, even without iodinated contrast, this technique can be used to select and subtract voxels with calcium to subtract bone, a useful technique to improve visibility of small extra axial hemorrhages in the head [22,23,24] (Fig. 16). Imaging at more than one beam energy also creates the opportunity to reconstruct the data as though the scan was performed at a selected virtual beam energy. A lower beam energy improves soft tissue contrast but may suffer from increased noise (Fig. 17). A higher beam energy will decrease beam hardening, for example, at the pons or adjacent to a metal object, but soft tissue characteristics may be diminished [22, 23]. The blend of data from the high and low kilovolt (kV) tubes can be adjusted for noise and beam hardening artifact, but as with virtual mono kiloelectron volt (keV) reconstructions, will alter soft tissue contrast. For optimal spectral separation, the beam energies should be as different as possible. For dual-energy scanning, 80 and 140 kV are most often utilized, unless the patient is very large [2, 4, 22].
Postmortem CTA has been reported as a method of imaging opacified vessels and tissues to overcome the limitations of routine PMCT in which analysis of soft tissue structures is limited [25,26,27]. Increased vascular permeability postmortem limits the utility of routinely used water-soluble contrast media in adult-sized patients [26,27,28]. To overcome this phenomenon, use of water-soluble contrast in polyethylene glycol [29, 30] has been reported. This technique provides myocardial, abdominal organ, and some tumor enhancement [30] with differentiation of arterial and venous phases possible due to a decrease in vascular enhancement over 15–20 min [31]. Use of oil-based contrast mixed in oil has also been described [27, 28, 32] with persistence of vascular enhancement up to 72 h [30]. Extravasation of oil-based contrast into the pancreas and gastric mucosa has been reported and may simulate pathology [28, 32]. Administration of contrast has been reported using central venous access at the groin with a pump system to propel contrast as well as with peripheral intravenous access and use of chest compressions as in cardiopulmonary resuscitation to move the contrast through the body in adults. Potential pitfalls may arise with insufficient contrast volume for patient size or uneven contrast distribution due to blood coagulation within vessels or layering of fluid and contrast simulating vascular filling defects. For this reason, most authors advocate multiple phases of imaging [24, 25, 28, 30, 32] with abnormalities found on more than one phase felt to be true. One unique consideration is that the contrast may alter the chemistry of the intravascular contents and so body fluid sampling should occur prior to PMCTA [26, 27].
Use of PMCTA in infants and children has been described, although the techniques differ somewhat to those utilized in adults (Fig. 18). In one report, vascular access was obtained using the umbilical vessels with administration of 30% water-soluble contrast in 70% water while the body was rotated to improve even contrast distribution. A total of 6 ml (mL) per kilogram (kg) was administered with subsequent spiral CT showing successful vascular and cardiac opacification [33]. A second study described umbilical vascular access with administration of 3–20 mL injections with a scan performed after each. Body and cranial vascular opacification was sufficient to allow identification of an anomaly of the great vessels [34]. A third group found that direct cardiac intraventricular injection of 5–10 mL of contrast was required for adequate chamber visualization, although contrast leakage into the pleural space occurred in a few cases, possibly from cardiac overfilling [35]. Cranial venography performed with sagittal sinus access via the fontanelle has been described by Stein et al. [36] utilizing 25% water-soluble contrast in water with subsequent scanning performed immediately due to rapid venous washout. The amount of contrast was dependent upon patient size. This technique allowed detection of hemorrhage from torn bridging veins. Chevalier et al. [37] performed a modified adult PMCTA technique with central vascular access in a 7-year-old. They used half the volume of an adult technique with one-half the rate of contrast administration and reported successful head and torso vascular opacification. Most recently, Bruch et al. [38] reported that when the umbilical vessels were patent, they could be accessed for PMCTA of the arterial and venous circulations. Intraosseous injection of contrast could also be performed but only opacified the venous circulation unless there was a shunt such as a patent foramen ovale. The femoral vessels could also be accessed for both arterial and venous evaluation in older infants.
Reported scan parameters for PMCTA suggest utilizing a kVp between 110 and 130 [27, 30, 34, 38]; however, a kVp of 100 would be closer to the K-edge of iodine and may improve contrast conspicuity [1, 2]. Other components of technique including tube current, pitch, and field of view would be similar to those used for unenhanced PMCT. A soft kernel would likely be most useful. Reconstructions should include maximum intensity projection images, as in routine clinical CTA.
Ventilated PMCT has also been described to try to overcome another postmortem pitfall, that of lung collapse that can obscure lung pathology. Ventilated PMCT attempts to recreate a breath hold by forcing air into the lungs during scanning both opening airways and pushing interstitial fluid back into pulmonary vessels. A pediatric ventilated PMCT technique has been described by Arthurs et al. [39] (Fig. 19). They reported greater success in expanding the lungs and avoiding air leaks resulting in gastric distension utilizing appropriately sized laryngeal mask airways rather than existing endotracheal tubes. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure sufficient to maintain chest wall height during scanning provided superior lung expansion to ventilation with a bag. The authors recommended scanning before and following artificial ventilation in case of artifactual pneumothorax creation. A multidetector scanner was employed to obtain a continuous spiral acquisition with variable tube current, a kVp of 120, a pitch of 1, and 0.625-mm collimation.
A discussion of microfocus CT is beyond the scope of this article.
Segmentation and related applications
A discussion of segmentation techniques is beyond the scope of this article and the reader is referred to the excellent discussion by Ebert et al. [14] for further information. A clear, artifact-free, high-resolution dataset is required for optimal segmentation. A number of segmentation techniques are available for selection of desired structures. The most common techniques are thresholding, using a set range of attenuation values to select the appropriate anatomy, and region growing, using a selected point to extend the region of interest to neighboring voxels with similar attenuation values [14]. Thresholding is best utilized for structures such as bone, metal, or air that differ greatly in attenuation from surrounding structures. Region growing works well with smaller structures or to refine a structure selected by thresholding. Once the desired anatomy is carefully selected, the data can be utilized for volumetry [14] or converted to a polygon mesh as a stereolithography file [14]. The next step is repair of any holes or overlaps in the mesh, reduction of the number of triangles, smoothing, and fragment removal. At this point, the file can be converted to a portable document format for display, 3-D printed, or utilized in virtual reality or augmented reality applications [14]. This type of data manipulation can be very effective for teaching and courtroom display, but because the data has been technically manipulated, volume renderings and 3-D prints are used for demonstration and are not considered evidence.
Summary
PMCT can be a useful tool in death investigation in children, both in the setting of perinatal demise and in forensic investigation. Unlike clinical CT performed for living patients, scanning protocols can be adjusted to provide high-resolution, low-noise datasets. Multiple scans can be performed, if necessary, based on patient size and/or positioning, or in the setting of high-attenuation material or objects. Advances in data processing allow multiplanar reformatting to allow optimal visibility of pathology, volume rendering for surface analysis and spatial relationships, and even spectral decomposition in the setting of dual-energy or photon counting CT. Stored data can be reconstructed or even printed at a later date for education or legal presentation, but to be able to utilize the data, optimal technique in acquiring the scan is key.
References
Flach PM, Gascho D, Schweitzer W, Ruder TD, Berger N, Ross SG et al (2014) Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:583–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9555-6
Gascho D, Thali MJ, Niemann T (2018) Post-mortem computed tomography: technical principles and recommended parameter settings for high resolution imaging. Med Sci Law 58:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802417747167
Norberti N, Tonelli P, Giaconi C, Nardi C, Focardi M, Nesi G et al (2019) State of the art in post-mortem computed tomography: a review of the literature. Virchows Arch 475:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02562-4
Gould SW, Harty MP, Givler NE, Christensen TE, Curtin RN, Harcke HT (2019) Pediatric postmortem computed tomography: initial experience at a children’s hospital in the United States. Pediatr Radiol 49:1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04433-1
Shelmerdine SC, Gerrard CY, Rao P, Lynch M, Kroll J, Martin D et al (2019) Joint European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and International Society for Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) guidelines: paediatric postmortem computed tomography imaging protocol. Pediatr Radiol 49:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-04340-x
Ford JM, Decker SJ (2016) Computed tomography slice thickness and its effects on three-dimensional reconstruction of anatomical structures. J Forens Radiol Imaging 4:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2015.10.004
Shelmerdine SC, Davendralingam N, Langan D, Palm L, Mangham C, Arthurs OJ, and CORNRD Study Collaborators (2024) Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detrection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children. EurRadiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10679-7
Eilfritz J, Jarell SJ (2023) “Developments in postmortem imaging” in Ely SF and Gill JR (eds) Principles of Forensic Pathology, Elsevier, Amsterdam
Mahesh M (2002) The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. Radiographics 22:949–962. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl14949
Edwards H, Shelmerdine SC, Arthurs OJ (2023) Forensic post-mortem CT in children. Clin Radiol 78:839–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.06.001
Speelman AC, Engel-Hills PC, Martin LJ, van Rijn RR, Offiah AC (2022) Postmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalities. Pediatr Radiol 52:2620–2629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05406-7
Cheung JP, Shugard E, Mistry N, Poullot J, Chen J (2018) Evaluating the impact of extended field-of view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy in radiation therapy. Med Phys 46:892–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13299
Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 24:1679–1691. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.246045065
Ebert LC, Dobay A, Franckenberg S, Thali MJ, Decker S, Ford J (2022) Image segmentation of post-mortem computed tomography data in forensic imaging: methods and applications. Forens Imag 28:200483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2021.200483
Ebert LC, Franckenberg S, Sieberth T, Schweitzer W, Thali M, Ford J, Decker S (2021) A review of visualization techniques of post-mortem computed tomography data for forensic death investigations. Int J Legal Med 135:1855–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02581-4
Yang KM, Lynch M (2011) O’Donnell C (2011) “Buckle” rib fracture: an artifact following cardio-pulmonary resuscitation detected on post-mortem CT. Legal Med 13:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.05.004
Brough AL, Rutty GN, Black S, Morgan B (2012) Post-mortem computed tomography and 3-D imaging: anthropological applications for juvenile remains. Forens Sci Med Pathol 8:270–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9344-z
Orman G, Wagner M, Seeburg D, Zamora C, Oshmyansky A, Tekes A et al (2015) Pediatric skull fracture diagnosis: should 3-D CT reconstructions be added as routine imaging? J Neurosurg Pediatr 16:426–431. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.PEDS1553
Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Calder AD, Arthurs OJ (2021) 3-D cinematic rendering of fetal skeletal dysplasias using postmortem computed tomography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57:659–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23140
Dappa E, Higashigaito K, Fornaro J, Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H (2016) Cinematic rendering-an alternative to volume rendering for 3-D computed tomographic imaging. Insights Imaging 7:849–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0518-1
Eid M, DeCecco CN, Nance JW, Caruso D, Albrecht MH, Spandorfer AJ, De Santis D, Varga-Szemes A (2017) Schoepf UJ (2017) Cinematic rendering in CT: a novel, lifelike 3-D visualization technique. Am J Roentgen 209:370–379. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.17850
Persson A, Jackowski C, Engstrom E, Zachrisson H (2008) Advances of dual source, dual-energy imaging in post-mortem CT. Eur J Radiol 68:446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.008
Rajiah P, Parakh A, Kay F, Baruah D, Kambadakone AR, Leng S (2020) Update on multienergy CT: physics, principles, and applications. Radiographics 40:1284–1308. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200038
Chandy PE, Murray N, Khasanova E, Nasir MU, Nicolau S, Macri F (2020) Postmortem CT in trauma: an overview. Can Assoc of Radiol J 71:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537120909503
Busardo FP, Frati P, Guglielmi G, Grilli G, Pinto A, Rotondo A et al (2015) Postmortem-computed tomography and postmortem-computed tomography-angiography: a focused update. Radiol Med 120:810–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0559-4
Lee H, Lee S, Cha JG, Baek T, Yang K (2019) Postmortem computed tomography and computed tomography angiography. J Thoracic Imaging 34:286–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000398
Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhofer R, Dominguez A, Solberger B et al (2011) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med 125:791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0526-5
Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol 87:20130488. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130488
Jackowski C, Bollinger S, Aghayev E, Christe A, Kilchoer T, Aebi B et al (2006) Reduction of postmortem angiography-induced tissue edema by using polyethylene glycol as a contrast agent dissolver. J Forens Sci 51:1134–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00207.x
Ross S, Spendlove D, Bollinger S, Christie A, Oesterhelweg L, Grabherr S et al (2008) Postmortem whole-body CT angiography: evaluation of two contrast media solutions. Am J Roentgenol 190:1380–1389. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3082
Ross SG, Bolliger SA, Ampanozi G, Oesterhelweg L, Thali MJ, Flach PM (2014) Postmortem CT angiography: capabilites and limitations in traumatic and natural causes of death. Radiographics 34:830–846. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.343115169
Grabherr S, Egger C, Vilarino R, Campana L, Jotterand M, Dedouit F (2017) Modern post-mortem imaging: an update on recent developments. For Sci Res 2:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1330738
Sarda-Quarello L, Bartoli C, Laurent P-E, Torrents J, Piercecchi-Marti M-D, Sigaudy S et al (2016) Whole body perinatal postmortem angiography. Diagn Interv Imaging 97:121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.11.002
Wozniak KJ, Moskala A, Kluza P, Romaszko K, Lopatin O, Rzepecka-Wozniak E (2015) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography angiography of a newborn revealing transposition of great arteries. Int J Legal Med 129:1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1267-2
Votino C, Cannie M, Segers V, Dobrescu O, Dessy H, Gallo V et al (2012) Virtual autopsy by computed tomographic angiography of the fetal heart: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:679–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.11150
Stein KM, Ruf K, Ganten MK, Mattern R (2006) Representation of cerebral bridging veins in infants by postmortem computed tomography. For Sci Int 163:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.015
Chevalier C, Michaud K, Palmiere C, Alamo L, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2015) Multiphase postmortem computed tomography angiography in pediatrics: a case report. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 36:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000189
Bruch GM, Hofer P, Ferraz da Silva LF, Pires-Davidson JR, Bentos dos Santos GA, Fischer FT (2023) Pediatric postmortem CT angiography: validation of vascular access for PMCT angiography in stillbirths, babies, and toddlers. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-023-00726-y
Arthurs OJ, Guy A, Kiho L, Sebire NJ (2015) Ventilated post mortem computed tomography in children: feasibility and initial experience. Int J Legal Med 129:1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1189-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W.G. interpreted and collected some of the cases, organized and wrote the manuscript, and collected references. M.H. interpreted and collected most of the cases and provided input into manuscript design. Both authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gould, S.W., Harty, M. Pediatric forensic postmortem computed tomography: basics to advanced. Pediatr Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06014-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06014-3