Abstract
With the emerging use of ultrasound in the evaluation of children with Crohn disease presenting with acute abdominal symptoms, there is a need to become familiar with the sonographic features of this disease. Our aim is to provide a primer of the characteristic intramural and extramural US findings in children with Crohn disease to serve as a practical and systematic guide to interpretation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Early recognition of the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is crucial in a child. Delayed diagnosis may lead to adverse effects on growth, sexual maturation and acute complications. Unfortunately, 25% of children with Crohn disease have symptoms for more than 1 year before diagnosis due to the nonspecific symptomatology [1]. Ninety percent of patients with Crohn disease have involvement of the terminal ileum, but the disease can involve other portions of the small bowel including the colon [2]. Despite the fact that the small intestine is tortuous and extensive in length, we can still evaluate it well with ultrasound (US) [3]. The majority of children with Crohn disease have repeat imaging. This is primarily due to the natural history of Crohn disease, which is manifested by periods of exacerbations and remissions.
The overall trend in imaging these children is to move away from fluoroscopic procedures, conventional CT and CT enteroclysis techniques and move toward enterographic techniques, MR enterography (MRE) and CT enterography (CTE) [4]. However, published literature describes no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of the evaluation of IBD with MRE, multidetector CT and US [5]. US is used widely in Europe and Asia to assess the bowel in Crohn disease, but only recently is being used in pediatric radiology practices in the United States [6–8]. US is emerging as a practical alternative to MRE and CTE in the evaluation of known Crohn disease and in its initial diagnosis. Recent publications have focused on the US technique; however, interpretation of these studies is equally important and challenging. Currently, there has been little emphasis placed on this in published literature. The purpose of this article is to provide an atlas of pathology seen on bowel US in pediatric Crohn disease that can serve as a practical guide when interpreting these US cases.
Utilization and standardization of bowel ultrasound
Currently, in our practice, we use bowel US as a screening evaluation in the initial diagnosis for Crohn disease in any child who needs sedation for a MRE, particularly in children younger than 10 years or in any child who has a contraindication to MRE. These young, potential IBD patients undergo a bowel US without prior MRE, CTE or small bowel follow-through (SBFT). It has been shown that the absence of bowel wall thickening is a strong negative predictive value [9]. In patients who have had prior MRE and have localized disease, bowel US can be used in follow-up to determine improvement or progression of disease. Additionally, it can be used to evaluate abdominal complications of Crohn disease such as intra-abdominal abscesses and strictures [7]. The authors particularly find it helpful in evaluating complex fistulas and strictures that may require real-time imaging to accurately diagnose. Every patient referred for a bowel US receives a standard thorough US examination, as outlined in our technique section. If there is a specific question that needs attention, additional imaging will be performed. Standardized studies will enable easy comparison of diseased segments of bowel, especially if a patient has had a prior bowel US.
Advantages of ultrasound
US evaluation of Crohn disease has several advantages over other imaging techniques. Abdominal US is easily performed, readily available, is less expensive than other modalities such as MRE and CTE, and obviates the use of ionizing radiation [3, 4]. An MRE evaluation can be limited in children younger than age 10 who may require sedation as well as those who have trouble cooperating with oral contrast regimens and motion [8]. US has better patient compliance as sedation, oral contrast or bowel cleansing regimens are not required. Advances in technology have improved the diagnostic accuracy of US in the past decade [10]. High-frequency linear array probes have provided improved spatial and temporal resolution. There has been greater penetration and increased contrast resolution of bowel wall architecture [3, 11]. US has been shown to accurately assess the degree of inflammation of the bowel wall and evaluate extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD [7].
Using imaging modalities without ionizing radiation is essential in pediatric Crohn disease patients who may be at higher risk than the general population of increased diagnostic radiation exposure due to repetitive imaging [12, 13]. For instance, in a study of nearly 1,600 children with IBD, 34% of patients with Crohn disease were exposed to at least one MDCT exam or three fluoroscopy studies during a 2-year period [13]. Using bowel US instead of studies that utilize ionizing radiation can significantly decrease the cumulative radiation burden to these children.
Limitations
There are practical limitations to bowel US. These include operator skills variability, lack of an acoustic window due to bowel gas, large body habitus and distorted anatomy in postoperative patients or postoperative patients with ostomies [6, 13]. Practically, performing a bowel US with adequate compression in an obese patient is challenging. Our pediatric Crohn disease population is not comprised of obese patients and there is no body mass index (BMI) cutoff for performing a bowel US. In fact, these patients are usually underweight and malnourished [2]. Additionally, US has been shown to be less accurate in the evaluation of bowel that is less accessible such as the rectum and upper small bowel in comparison to other locations [14].
Technique
In brief, the US evaluation of the bowel involves graded compression along with additional posterior compression to displace the overlying bowel gas and shorten the distance from the transducer to the loop of bowel of interest. While simultaneously compressing the bowel, anteriorly with the transducer, a hand is placed underneath the patient to apply posterior manual pressure in the same area [6, 15]. At our institution, we begin with the highest frequency linear transducer we have available (12-15 MHz) and then decrease the transducer frequency as needed depending on the body habitus of the patient to evaluate the deeper pelvis to look for fluid collections or abscesses [3, 11, 16]. Beginning with the terminal ileum (TI) and ileocecal junction, each portion of the colon is traced to the sigmoid colon and rectum. Using the lower frequency transducer and with a full bladder as an acoustic window, the rectosigmoid colon can be evaluated. The small bowel, duodenum, jejunum and ileum in all four respective abdominal quadrants are then evaluated. Each bowel segment is scanned in the transverse and longitudinal planes and evaluated with color Doppler to assess hyperemia. Color Doppler should be performed at a low pulse repetition frequency with a low wall filter, low velocity scale and highest Doppler gain [6, 17, 18]. Extra-intestinal structures such as the mesentery are also evaluated with gray-scale and color Doppler simultaneously with each bowel segment [6].
The bowel US is performed non-emergently and patients are restricted from oral intake of solids for 4 h prior to the examination. However, patients are encouraged to drink 12-16 oz of water prior to scanning. This helps to reduce bowel gas and provides a distended bladder, which pushes small bowel loops out of the pelvis and enables adequate imaging of the sigmoid and rectum. Carbonated drinks are discouraged. At our institution, the entire bowel US examination can be completed in about 10-20 min.
Normal bowel and mesentery
When using US frequencies in the range of 7.5 to 14 MHz, normal bowel wall stratification on US consists of five layers: 1) echogenic mucosal interface, 2) hypoechoic mucosa, 3) hyperechoic submucosa, 4) hypoechoic muscularis propria and 5) hyperechoic serosa (Fig. 1) [3, 16, 17]. The thickness of each layer of the bowel does not correspond to the actual anatomical thickness since the sonographic image results from echoes secondary to acoustic interfaces rather than the structure itself [16]. Normal small bowel wall thickness is less than 2.5 mm and normal colonic wall thickness is less than 2 mm in children [6, 13]. In our practice, any segment of bowel with a wall thickness of 3 mm or greater is considered abnormal. Normal bowel shows very little or no vascularity on color Doppler with the currently existing US scanners and is compressible and peristaltic [6]. It is challenging to distinguish jejunum from ileum when bowel loops are abnormal. However, the normal jejunum can be differentiated from ileum, as it has more folds that have a distinct pattern on US, similar to their appearance on conventional SBFT (Fig. 2). The normal mesentery is easiest to visualize with increased mesenteric adipose tissue. The mesentery should appear as multiple non-peristaltic parallel echogenic structures [15]. It demonstrates little vascularity. We can deduct this based on data showing that in the setting of IBD there is increased flow in the mesenteric and portal vessels manifesting as increased vascularity in the mesentery due to angiogenesis [19, 20].
Intramural Crohn disease pathology
Mural thickening
Although not the only sonographic finding of Crohn disease, bowel wall thickening is the most commonly used finding (Figs. 3 and 4) [10, 11]. Several studies have evaluated bowel wall thickness showing a strong correlation between wall thickness and Crohn disease [1, 21, 22]. In a meta-analysis, Fraquelli et al. [23] demonstrated a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 93% for the diagnosis of Crohn disease with a bowel wall thickness of greater than 3 mm and a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 97% for the diagnosis of Crohn disease with a bowel wall thickness of greater than 4 mm. Maximal wall thickness and disease activity have also been shown to have a statistically significant correlation [13].
Loss of bowel wall stratification
The loss of bowel wall stratification develops over time with Crohn disease and corresponds pathologically to deep ulcers and fissures (Figs. 3 and 4) [6, 10]. Crohn disease begins with ulcerations at the mucosal level and can extend transmurally into the serosa [7]. Bowel wall stratification is not the only marker of disease. The correlation between active inflammation and loss of stratification in adults was demonstrated on in vitro US examination of the bowel [24]. Additionally, Haber et al. [25] demonstrated that 7 of 8 adults with severe disease activity had loss of stratification, but this was not statistically significant due to a small sample size. Maconi et al. [26] demonstrated that in adults with a stricture, loss of stratification of the bowel wall was associated with inflammation. However, it is important to keep in mind that making the distinction between active disease and fibrosis is very challenging as both can exist in the same segment of diseased bowel. In our practice, given that the supporting evidence in the literature is limited, we do not routinely use the presence or loss of bowel wall stratification to differentiate inflammation from fibrosis. The reported literature is limited and larger cohort studies are needed to validate these findings before applying them to daily practice.
Bowel wall hyperemia
Hyperemia on color Doppler imaging is characteristic of active disease (Figs. 4 and 5) [6, 10, 16]. Although there is currently no objective scale for the determination of bowel wall hyperemia using color Doppler, we most commonly utilize subjective grading in our practice [11]. Others have used a quantitative approach to determining hyperemia based on vessel density (Doppler signals per square cm) in a segment of bowel. By estimating the vessel density in the intestinal wall using Doppler color signals per square centimeter, Spalinger et al. [19] demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 69% for active Crohn disease with high vessel density (greater than 5 signals per square centimeter) and a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 89% for active Crohn disease with moderate to high vessel density (3 to 5 signals per square centimeter). Additionally, residual hyperemia following treatment had an unfavorable clinical course [18].
Strictures
Strictures develop in 21% of patients with ileal Crohn disease and are the most common cause of surgical intervention [7]. US definition and features of a stricture are a narrowed lumen with upstream proximal bowel dilatation. There is usually pseudo-fecalization of the more proximal loops and there may be hyperperistalsis under real-time imaging, an added advantage of US (Figs. 6 and 7) [6, 7]. US has been reported to be 100% sensitive and 91% specific for identifying strictures in adults [27], but other numbers report that US accurately diagnosed strictures in only 70-79% [6, 7].
Peristalsis
Peristalsis can be assessed by US during real-time imaging to provide functional information of abnormal bowel segments. We can pinpoint the abnormality with the transducer and simulate the patient’s symptoms in real time. Abnormal small bowel loops lose their distensibility, are spastic and are hypoperistaltic [10]. When there is a transition from a dilated to a narrowed loop of bowel, the prestenotic loop of bowel is hyperperistaltic [6].
Extramural Crohn disease pathology
Mesenteric inflammation
Perienteric inflammation produces US findings of inflammation and thickening of the mesentery (Figs. 8 and 9). This also manifests as increased echogenicity of the mesenteric fat and hyperemia when evaluated by color Doppler [6, 11]. The hypertrophy of the mesentery can be manifested as “creeping fat,” which appears as fingerlike projections over the serosal surface of the bowel (Fig. 6) [28].
Free fluid and abscess
US is extremely sensitive for the detection of free fluid [11]. Additionally, US has proven to be a successful modality for the identification of an abscess (Figs. 10 and 11). US sensitivity for the identification of abscesses ranges from 81% to 100% with a specificity ranging from 92% to 94% [14]. US has been reported to be superior to CT for the evaluation of small abscesses [16]. In a study by Gasche et al. [27], US successfully identified 9 of 9 abscesses and excluded 22 of 25 abscesses in patients with Crohn disease. A limitation of US is that there is a higher rate of false-positive results in comparison to CT. Abscesses within the deep pelvis and adjacent to the stomach are more difficult to evaluate [14].
Lymphadenopathy
Although the presence of regional lymphadenopathy is weakly correlated with active Crohn disease, US is a useful tool to identify enlarged lymph nodes, which may be associated with Crohn disease [11, 29]. Regional lymphadenopathy is common in Crohn disease [7]. Mesenteric lymph nodes adjacent to and draining abnormal segments of bowel, commonly in the right lower quadrant, are often increased in number and size. They are usually oval hypoechoic structures within the mesentery, most commonly within the right lower quadrant. There may be a conglomeration of nodes forming a lobulated mass [28].
Fistula
Fistulas in IBD are more common in adults than in children. Fistulas can be a communication of the bowel with other loops of bowel, the vagina, the urethra, bladder or prostate [6]. The sensitivity of US for the diagnosis of fistulas is 74% with a specificity of 95% [14]. Fistulas are manifested by hypoechoic communicating tracts extending from the bowel (Fig. 12) [6]. The use of power Doppler may help to identify the fistula given its rich microvascularization [16].
Future imaging
Utilization of techniques such as intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and US elastography have demonstrated great promise in the differentiation of acute from chronic fibrostenotic disease. CEUS involves the interrogation of the wall of the intestine following intravenous injection of US contrast agents [30]. In the United States, there are two FDA-approved contrast agents for off-label use in children and both have a high safety profile: Optison® (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ) and Lumason® (Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Monroe Township, NJ). Following the injection of an US contrast agent, the enhancement pattern can be visually assessed. Submucosal enhancement with sparing of the muscularis propria and complete transmural enhancement beginning at the mucosa and extending outward to involve the entire bowel wall are two patterns that are related to active inflammatory Crohn disease [31]. Given that the assessment of enhancement by visual analysis is limited by interobserver variability, quantitative analysis using a region of interest can be performed. On quantitative analysis, active Crohn disease has shown reduced time to peak enhancement, increased percentage of maximal enhancement and increased area under the time-intensity curve in comparison to nonactive disease in adults [31]. Additionally, in adults with Crohn disease, the degree of bowel wall enhancement has correlated well with the severity of disease on endoscopy and with contrast-enhanced MRE evaluation of bowel wall vascularity (Fig. 13) [32, 33].
US elastography measures tissue stiffness based on Young’s E modulus. There are two main techniques to perform US elastography: strain or shear wave. In strain elastography, an external force is applied to the tissue, usually by manual compression (stress) with an US probe [3, 34]. This elastogram image is created based on the tissue displacement and strain is displayed as a color map adjacent to or superimposed on the B mode images of the bowel. Color images provide a visual map of degree of bowel wall stiffness (Fig. 14) [34]. Materials that demonstrate low strain in response to a degree of compression have decreased compliance and are stiffer than materials that demonstrate high strain [35]. This technique is easy to perform; however, it is limited to superficial anatomy and is operator dependent and therefore can be difficult to reproduce. If the applied stress is unknown, tissue elasticity cannot be quantified.
In shear wave elastography, a wave perpendicular to the tissues is created by one of several methods. Tissue stiffness is then quantified based on the speed of propagation of this shear wave through the tissue. The advantages of shear wave over strain elastography are user independence, strain quantification and the ability to image relatively deeper tissues. Qualitative color maps can also be created. Similar to strain techniques, soft and hard tissues are assigned a color; however, these color maps are elastography technique and vendor specific.
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse technology (ARFI) is a type of shear wave elastography. In this method, the US sends out low velocity shear waves that displace the tissues and the velocities of these waves are detected by the US probe. Waves propagate faster in stiffer tissues [34]. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis can be performed. Preliminary data in both animal and human models have been described which suggest elastography can help to differentiate inflammation from fibrosis in stricturing Crohn disease [35, 36].
Conclusion
By evaluating both mural and extramural findings, US has the potential to be efficacious in the evaluation of children with Crohn disease. It is noninvasive, can be performed without sedation and lacks ionizing radiation. Expanding the use of US can significantly decrease the radiation dose to patients with IBD. We have provided a bowel US primer of the spectrum of Crohn disease pathology seen in children and a practical approach to interpretation in the hopes to expand the use of US as stand-alone or complementary to other enterographic techniques.
References
Canani RB, de Horatio LT, Terrin G et al (2006) Combined use of noninvasive tests is useful in the initial diagnostic approach to a child with suspected inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 42:9–15
Griffiths AM (2004) Specificities of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:509–523
Nylund K, Odegaard S, Hausken T et al (2009) Sonography of the small intestine. World J Gastroenterol 15:1319–1330
Anupindi SA, Grossman AB, Nimkin K et al (2014) Current imaging in the evaluation of the young IBD patient: what the gastroenterologist needs to know. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000000475
Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ et al (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247:64–78
Anupindi SA, Halverson M, Khwaja A et al (2014) Common and uncommon applications of bowel ultrasound with pathological correlation in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:946–959
Maconi G, Radice E, Greco A et al (2006) Bowel ultrasound in Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20:93–112
Anupindi SA, Darge K (2009) Imaging choices in inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:S149–S152
Bremner AR, Griffiths M, Argent JD et al (2006) Sonographic evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, blinded, comparative study. Pediatr Radiol 36:947–953
Alison M, Kheniche A, Azoulay R et al (2007) Ultrasonography of Crohn disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 37:1071–1082
Strobel D, Goetz RS, Bernatik T (2011) Diagnostics in inflammatory bowel disease: ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 17:3192–3197
Domina JG, Dillman JR, Adler J et al (2013) Imaging trends and radiation exposure in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease at an academic children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W133–W140
Herfarth H, Palmer L (2009) Risk of radiation and choice of imaging. Dig Dis 27:278–284
Panes J, Bouzas R, Chaparro M et al (2011) Systemic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:125–145
Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC et al (2002) Graded compression sonography with adjuvant use of a posterior manual compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:863–868
Cammarota T, Sarno A, Robitti D et al (2009) US evaluation of patients affected with IBD: how to do it, methods and findings. Eur J Radiol 69:429–437
Darge K, Anupindi S, Keener H et al (2010) Ultrasound of the bowel in children: how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 40:528–536
Ripolles T, Martinez MJ, Barrachina MM (2008) Crohn’s disease and color Doppler sonography: response to treatment and its relationship with long-term prognosis. J Clin Ultrasound 36:267–272
Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron MC et al (2000) Doppler US in patients with Crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology 217:787–791
Scholbach T, Herrero I, Scholbach J (2004) Dynamic color Doppler sonography of intestinal wall in patients with Crohn disease compared with healthy subjects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 39:524–528
Bremner AR, Griffiths M, Argen JD (2006) Sonographic evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, blinded, comparative study. Pediatr Radiol 36:947–953
Epifanio M, Baldisserotto M, Spolidoro JV et al (2008) Grey-scale and colour Doppler sonography in the evaluation of children with suspected bowel inflammation: correlation with colonoscopy and histological findings. Clin Radiol 63:968–978
Fraquelli M, Colli A, Casazza G et al (2005) Role of US in detection of Crohn disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 236:95–101
Hata J, Haruma K, Yamanaka H et al (1994) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the bowel wall in inflammatory bowel disease: comparison of in vivo and in vitro studies. Abdom Imaging 19:395–399
Haber HP, Busch A, Ziebach R et al (2002) Ultrasonographic findings correspond to clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings in inflammatory bowel disease and other enterocolitides. J Ultrasound Med 21:375–382
Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P et al (2003) Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: clinical, biochemical and ultrasonographic evalution of histological features. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:749–756
Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K et al (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44:112–117
Sarrazin J, Wilson SR (1996) Manifestations of Crohn disease at US. Radiographics 16:499–520
Mann EH (2008) Inflammatory bowel disease: imaging of the pediatric patient. Semin Roentgenol 43:29–38
Braden B, Ignee A, Hocke M et al (2010) Diagnostic value and clinical utility of contrast enhanced ultrasound in intestinal diseases. Dig Liver Dis 42:667–674
Quaia E (2013) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 38:1005–1013
Ripolles T, Martinez MJ, Paredes JM et al (2009) Crohn disease: correlation of findings at contrast-enhanced US with severity on endoscopy. Radiology 253:241–248
Pauls S, Gabelman A, Schmidt SA et al (2006) Evaluating bowel wall vascularity in Crohn’s disease: a comparison of dynamic MRI and wideband harmonic imaging contrast-enhanced low MU ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16:2410–2417
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M et al (2013) Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:487–495
Stidham RW, Xu J, Johnson LA et al (2011) Ultrasound elasticity imaging for detecting intestinal fibrosis and inflammation in rats and humans with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 141:819–826
Dillman JR, Stidham RW, Higgins PD et al (2013) US Elastography–derived shear wave velocity helps distinguish acutely inflamed from fibrotic bowel in a Crohn disease animal model. Radiology 267:757–766
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Dr. Dubravka Vidmar and Dr. Damjana Ključevšek, Clinical Radiology Institute, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia, for the use of Fig. 13 in this manuscript.
Thank you to Dr. Kassa Darge and Dr. Susan J. Back, Department of Radiology, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, for their editorial assistance.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
CME activity
This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit the SPR Web site at www.pedrad.org/ on the Education page and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biko, D.M., Rosenbaum, D.G. & Anupindi, S.A. Ultrasound features of pediatric Crohn disease: a guide for case interpretation. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1557–1566 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3351-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3351-7