Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Persistent and de novo symptoms decrease satisfaction after urogynecologic surgery. We investigated whether the preoperative bladder microbiome is associated with urinary symptoms prior to and after urogynecologic surgery.
Methods
One hundred twenty-six participants contributed responses to the validated OABq symptom questionnaire. Catheterized (bladder) urine samples and vaginal and perineal swabs were collected immediately preoperatively. Bacterial DNA in the urine samples and swabs was sequenced and classified.
Results
Preoperative symptom severity was significantly worse in sequence-positive patients. Higher OABq Symptom Severity (OABqSS) scores (more symptomatic) were associated with higher abundance in bladder urine of two bacterial species: Atopobium vaginae and Finegoldia magna. The presence of Atopobium vaginae in bladder urine also was correlated with its presence in either the vagina or perineum.
Conclusions
Two specific bacterial species detected in bladder urine, Atopobium vaginae and Finegoldia magna, are associated with preoperative urinary symptom severity in women undergoing POP/SUI surgery. The reservoir for Atopobium vaginae may be adjacent pelvic floor niches. This observation should be validated in a larger cohort to determine whether there is a microbiologic etiology for certain preoperative urinary symptoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Surgery is highly effective for treatment of certain urogynecologic conditions, including stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) [1]. Unfortunately, persistent or de novo urinary symptoms may occur, decreasing patient satisfaction [2, 3]. There is little evidence to predict the occurrence or severity of bothersome postoperative urinary symptoms. In addition to urinary symptoms, transient events occur, including postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), which affects at least 7–24% of women in the first 6 weeks after their urogynecologic surgery, despite prophylactic antibiotics and other preventive measures [4,5,6].
Until recently, the bladder was considered sterile. However, enhanced urine culture and culture-independent methods have revealed the presence of live microbes (bladder urine microbiome) in urine obtained directly from the urinary bladders of adult women. These studies have revealed associations between these bacteria and postoperative UTIs [7, 8], urgency urinary incontinence [9,10,11], and response to overactive bladder treatment [12]. They also have identified associations between some bacterial species and the lack of symptoms or protection against post-instrumentation UTI [10, 11]. These results suggest that the female urinary bladder contains microbes that can influence urinary symptoms.
In this analysis, we used culture-independent 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize associations between the preoperative microbiomes of the bladder urine, vagina, and perineum and symptoms in women prior to and after urogynecologic surgery.
Materials and methods
Study design
Recruitment and initial characterization of the main study cohort were previously described [7]. Briefly, after institutional review board approval, we approached women undergoing POP/SUI surgery at Loyola University Medical Center. Preoperatively and again 3 months after surgery, participants self-completed the validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) [13, 14] and overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) [15], with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Clinical data, such as age, BMI, medical comorbidities, type of POP/SUI surgery, and hormone status, were extracted from the electronic medical record. Hormone status was clinically defined and categorized as pre-menopausal, post-menopausal on hormones, or post-menopausal not on hormones.
Following induction of anesthesia and prior to systemic antibiotic administration, swabs were collected from the vagina (approximately 3 cm distal to the hymen) and perineum, and a catheterized urine sample was collected via the urinary catheter placed as part of the clinical surgical protocol. We used catheterized urine because previous studies showed that it was the proper collection for bladder urine [16, 17]. A portion of this urine sample was sent for standard clinical urine culture, and a portion was stored at -80C in 10% AssayAssure (Sierra Molecular, Incline Village, NV) prior to DNA isolation for sequencing. Each swab was suspended in 1 ml of PBS, and the suspension was stored at -80°C in 10% AssayAssure prior to DNA isolation for sequencing.
DNA isolation from urine
DNA isolation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing of urine cultures has been described previously [10]. To avoid contamination, isolation of DNA was performed in a laminar flow hood. Genomic DNA was extracted from 1 ml of urine or 1 ml of PBS swab suspension, using previously validated protocols developed for the Human Microbiome Project [10, 18, 19]. To isolate genomic DNA from urine samples and swabs, this protocol includes the addition of the peptidoglycan degrading enzymes, mutanolysin and lysozyme, that ensure robust lysis of gram-positive and -negative species [19]. Briefly, 1 ml of urine was centrifuged at 13,500 rpm for 10 min, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of filter-sterilized buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8), 2 mM EDTA, 1.2% Triton X-100, and 20 μg/ml lysozyme and supplemented with 30 μl of filter-sterilized mutanolysin (5000 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C, and the lysates were processed through the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA was eluted into 50 μl of buffer AE, pH 8.0, and stored at −20 °C.
Hyper-variable region 4 (V4) of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, commonly used in human microbiome studies, was amplified via a two-step PCR protocol, as described previously [10, 18]. Briefly, in the first amplification, the V4 region was amplified using Illumina MiSeq modified universal primers 515F and 806R. Extraction-negative controls (no urine) and PCR-negative controls (no template) were included to assess the contribution of extraneous DNA from reagents. Ten-microliter aliquots of each reaction mixture were run on a 1% agarose gel. Samples containing a band of approximately 360 bp were considered PCR-positive and subjected to further library preparation. Samples with no visible amplified product were considered PCR-negative and not processed further. The PCR-positive reaction mixtures were diluted 1:50 and amplified for an additional ten cycles, using primers encoding the required adapter sequences for Illumina MiSeq sequencing and an eight-nucleotide sample index. The PCR reaction was purified and size selected using Agencourt AMPure XP-PCR magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA). Each sample was quantified using the Qubit fluorometeric system (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA). The samples were pooled, quantified to a standard volume, and placed in the 2 × 250 bp sequencing reagent cartridge, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA).
Because bladder urine samples typically contain small amounts of bacteria (i.e., low biomass), amplification and sequencing were performed in duplicate (technical replicates), and samples were classified as either sequence-positive or -negative. A sequence-positive sample was one in which DNA was amplified from both replicas, and, if present, the dominant taxon (representing >50% of sequences from the sample) was the same in both replicas. For each sequence-positive sample, both replicas were used for further analysis. Because they usually contain high biomass, vaginal and perineal swabs were sequenced a second time only if the first attempt was negative.
Data analysis
The Illumina proprietary MiSeq post-sequencing software was used to preprocess sequences by removing primers and sample indices. Raw sequences were processed using the open-source program mothur (v1.37.4) by following its recommended MiSeq pipeline with minor alterations [20]. Briefly, mothur combined the paired end reads and removed contigs (overlapping sequence data) of incorrect length (< 290 bp, > 300 bp) and/or contigs containing ambiguous bases. Chimeric sequences were detected and removed using UCHIME within the mothur suite [21]. To correct for different sequencing depths of each sample, subsampling at a depth of 5000 total reads was performed. The sequence reads were clustered into species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with identity similarity cutoff at 0.97 [22]. Representative OTUs were selected on the basis of abundance and further classified using BLCA [23] at the species level. Student’s t-test was applied to examine the differences in age, symptom scores, and other continuous variables in clinical and demographic data between sequence-positive and -negative patients. The chi-squared test was applied to examine hormone status and other categorical variables in clinical and demographic data between sequence-positive and -negative patients. Linear regression was applied to identify the association between bacterial abundance and symptom scores. Spearman’s rank correlation was applied to examine the association of the bacterial abundance among the bladder, vaginal, and perineal microbiome.
For the linear regression analysis, we included only participants who (1) completed the PFDI and OABq at baseline and 3 months, (2) had a complete preoperative sample set (urine, vaginal swab, and perineal swab), and (3) whose bladder urine samples successfully underwent sequencing (i.e., sequence-positive). The associations between bacteria and the OABq Symptom Severity (OABqSS) score of the OAB-q were identified using linear regression with bacterial abundance as the independent variable and OABqSS scores as the dependent variables. The positive coefficient values display the increase in OABqSS scores related to a 1% increase in bacterial abundance. We also explored the linear regression model using age and hormonal status as confounding factors. In addition, we assessed the correlation for bacterial abundance among three pelvic floor niches using Spearman’s rank correlation.
Results
Patient characterization
Table 1 displays the demographics for the 126 women who met the inclusion criteria for this analysis; urine samples were sequence positive in 55 women and sequence negative in the remaining 71. There was no significant difference in demographics between the two sequence groups. Most participants (88%) were white; the mean age of participants was 59 years. The demographics of this group did not differ significantly from the larger, previously described study group [7]. The mean preoperative OABq symptom score was significanty higher in women with sequence-positive urine samples (sequence-positive women 40.5 vs. sequence-negative 32.1, p = 0.03); the mean post-surgery OABq symptom scores were similar (sequence positive 15.6 vs. sequence negative 15.2, p = 0.89). There was no difference in the PFDI subscale scores pre- or postoperatively between the sequence-positive and -negative groups.
Association of microbes with urinary symptoms
The most abundant genus in bladder urine was Lactobacillus with a median abundance of 30.34%, followed by Corynebacterium (10.08%), Gardnerella (6.06%), Staphylococcus (5.57%), and Enterobacter (4.67%) (Supplemental Figure 1A). In women with sequence-positive urine samples, all of the vaginal swabs were positive. The most abundant genus in the vaginal swabs was Lactobacillus with a median abundance of 25.71%, followed by Corynebacterium (10.98%), Anaerococcus (9.68%), Peptoniphilus (5.94%), and Gardnerella (5.34%) (Supplemental Figure 1B). Fifty-two of the perineal swabs were sequence positive in the women with sequence-positive urine samples. The most abundant genus on the perineal swabs was Lactobacillus with a median abundance of 55.29%, followed by Gardnerella (12.77%), Prevotella (3.81%), Anaerococcus (3.47%), and Corynebacterium (2.89%) (Supplemental Figure 1C).
Linear regression analysis identified an association between higher OABq symptoms scores and two specific bacterial species in the urine: Atopobium vaginae (p = 0.006) and Finegoldia magna (p = 0.008) (Table 2). We also observed correlations for abundances of A. vaginae in adjacent pelvic floor niches (Table 3): a strong correlation between A. vaginae abundances in the vagina and perineum (p < 0.001) and a weaker correlation between bladder urine and the vagina (p = 0.036) and a borderline significant correlation between the bladder urine and perineum (p = 0.054). We did not detect significant correlations for F. magna among the bladder urine, vagina, and perineum. Neither age nor hormonal status influenced these associations.
Discussion
In women undergoing urogynecologic surgery for SUI and/or POP, two specific bacterial species in urine, A. vaginae and F. magna, are associated with preoperative urinary symptom severity. This novel finding may provide additional insight into the etiology of certain urinary symptoms.
Most clinicians are not familiar with these two bacterial species; neither is detected on standard urine cultures. Both are fastidious anaerobic members of the gram-positive phylum Actinobacteria. A. vaginae is associated with bacterial vaginosis; evidence exists that it plays a major role along with Gardnerella vaginalis in establishing an adherent biofilm thought to be responsible for some BV treatment failures [24]. It has also has been implicated in maternal sepsis and pre-term birth [25,26,27]. Here, we have identified an association between A. vaginae and increased severity of overactive bladder symptoms. Previously, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to detect the genus Atopobium in catheterized urine obtained from peri-menopausal women with and without urgency urinary incontinence [10, 11]. This raises the question: do all A. vaginae cause lower urinary tract symptoms? The answer may be no, as A. vaginae is commonly found in the vaginas of women with no bacterial vaginosis symptoms [28,29,30]. Thus, it is possible that some A. vaginae isolates are causative agents of disease, while others are not. Alternatively, the same isolate might cause symptoms in one woman but not in another. Correlations between abundances of A. vaginae in adjacent pelvic floor niches suggest that the vagina and/or perineum might act as a reservoir for this emerging uropathogen. The second microbe of interest, F. magna, is an opportunistic human pathogen that normally colonizes the skin and mucous membranes; it has been associated with vaginoses, as well as wound infections, soft tissue and non-puerperal abscesses, bone and prosthetic joint infections, septic arthritis, and occasionally infectious endocarditis [31]. Prior to our study, it had not been associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.
The prevailing definition of a clinical uropathogen label is dichotomous, suggesting that a microbe is either always or never pathogenic. However, the pathogenicity clearly depends on the host response, including the health of the local biologic community. For organisms that have associations with urinary symptoms (e.g., A. vaginae), we hypothesize that they make some contribution to a urinary dysbioses associated with clinical symptoms. We hypothesize that some of these previously under-detected bacteria could be pathogenic in certain settings, and somewhat dependent on functions within a specific urinary microbiome, for example, the status of protective mechanisms, such as co-presence of Lactobacillus.
The novel findings of this analysis add to the emerging evidence that demonstrates that bacteria exist in the bladders of healthy women and women with lower urinary tract symptoms [8,9,10,11,12, 16, 18, 32,33,34,35], including patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery [8, 16]. With appropriate testing techniques, especially in women with higher levels of urinary symptom severity, the presence in either the vagina or bladder urine of microbes such as A. vaginae, or even the overall diversity of the bladder microbiota, could be determined prior to surgery, potentially improving pre-surgical counseling and perioperative symptom control. Although these two species were not associated with symptoms in the overall cohort at 3 months after surgery, we believe that our findings warrant replication and futher analysis to determine if certain individuals or subgroups may have a microbial basis for persistent or de novo OAB symptoms. At this time, we do not recommend changes to the current clinical use of perioperative antibiotics. However, future studies may provide refinements to the current strategy. Such studies would be complemented by an understanding of microbial restoration mechanisms after disruptive events such as surgery.
Our study had many strengths, including longitudinal, perioperative symptom assessment with a validated questionnaire and rigorous attention to avoidance of bacterial contamination and sequencing errors, which are essential when working with low biomass samples, such as urine. In contrast, we did not collect postoperative samples, which would have allowed us to describe the composition and characteristics of the post-surgical microbiota. Despite these limitations, we hope our findings can inform the design of future studies that seek to reduce the presence of bothersome urinary symptoms in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.
Conclusions
Detection of urinary bacteria is correlated with perioperative urinary symptoms in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. Preoperative knowledge of an individual woman’s urinary microbial community, including the presence of A. vaginae, may allow refinements to counseling regarding postoperative symptom resolution.
Abbreviations
- OABq :
-
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire
- UDI :
-
Urinary Distress Inventory
- POPDI :
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory
- CRADI :
-
Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)
- UTI :
-
Urinary tract infection
- POP :
-
Pelvic organ prolapse
- UI :
-
Urinary incontinence
- BMI :
-
Body mass index
- DNA :
-
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- PCR :
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- OTU :
-
Operational taxonomic unit
- SUI :
-
Stress urinary incontinence
References
Riemsma R, Hagen S, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Norton C, Wijk H, Andersson KE, et al. Can incontinence be cured? A systematic review of cure rates. BMC Med. 2017;15:63.
Burgio KL, Brubaker L, Richter HE, Wai CY, Litman HJ, France DB, et al. Patient satisfaction with stress incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1403–9.
Pham T, Kenton K, Mueller E, Brubaker L. New pelvic symptoms are common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:88.e81–5.
Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:929–32.
Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Chai TC, Markland AD, Menefee SA, Sirls L, et al. Risk factors for urinary tract infection following incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1255–65.
Gehrich AP, Patzwald JR, Kern ME, Squires CC, Lustik MB. The incidence of early and recurrent urinary tract infections after midurethral sling operations. Mil Med. 2014;179:1301–6.
Fok CS, McKinley K, Mueller ER, Kenton K, Schreckenberger P, Wolfe A, et al. Day of surgery urine cultures identify urogynecologic patients at increased risk for postoperative urinary tract infection. J Urol. 2013;189:1721–4.
Nienhouse V, Gao X, Dong Q, Nelson DE, Toh E, McKinley K, et al. Interplay between bladder microbiota and urinary antimicrobial peptides: mechanisms for human urinary tract infection risk and symptom severity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114185.
Karstens L, Asquith M, Davin S, Stauffer P, Fair D, Gregory WT, et al. Does the urinary microbiome play a role in urgency urinary incontinence and its severity? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:78.
Pearce MM, Hilt EE, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Thomas-White K, Fok C, et al. The female urinary microbiome: a comparison of women with and without urgency urinary incontinence. MBio. 2014;5:e01283–14.
Pearce MM, Zilliox MJ, Rosenfeld AB, Thomas-White KJ, Richter HE, Nager CW, et al. The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:347.e341–11.
Thomas-White KJ, Hilt EE, Fok C, Pearce MM, Mueller ER, Kliethermes S, et al. Incontinence medication response relates to the female urinary microbiota. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:723–33.
Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1388–95.
Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence program for women research group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:131–9.
Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, Corey R, Stewart W, Bentkover J, et al. Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the oab-q. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:563–74.
Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, Fitzgerald M, et al. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1376–83.
Ackerman AL, Underhill DM. The mycobiome of the human urinary tract: potential roles for fungi in urology. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:31.
Hilt EE, McKinley K, Pearce MM, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Mueller ER, et al. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:871–6.
Yuan S, Cohen DB, Ravel J, Abdo Z, Forney LJ. Evaluation of methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from the human microbiome. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33865.
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–41.
Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. Uchime improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–200.
Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rrna sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–7.
Gao X, Lin H, Revanna K, Dong Q. A bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16s rrna gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18:247.
Polatti F. Bacterial vaginosis, atopobium vaginae and nifuratel. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2012;7:36–40.
Knoester M, Lashley LE, Wessels E, Oepkes D, Kuijper EJ. First report of atopobium vaginae bacteremia with fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1684–6.
Bretelle F, Rozenberg P, Pascal A, Favre R, Bohec C, Loundou A, et al. High atopobium vaginae and gardnerella vaginalis vaginal loads are associated with preterm birth. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:860–7.
Bretelle F, Fenollar F, Baumstarck K, Fortanier C, Cocallemen JF, Serazin V, et al. Screen-and-treat program by point-of-care of atopobium vaginae and gardnerella vaginalis in preventing preterm birth (autop trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:470.
Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, et al. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy caucasian and black women. ISME J. 2007;1:121–33.
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4680–7.
De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR, et al. Quantitative determination by real-time pcr of four vaginal lactobacillus species, gardnerella vaginalis and atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between l. Gasseri and l Iners. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:115.
Murphy EC, Frick IM. Gram-positive anaerobic cocci--commensals and opportunistic pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:520–53.
Fouts DE, Pieper R, Szpakowski S, Pohl H, Knoblach S, Suh MJ, et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16s rdna and metaproteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury. J Transl Med. 2012;10:174.
Khasriya R, Sathiananthamoorthy S, Ismail S, Kelsey M, Wilson M, Rohn JL, et al. Spectrum of bacterial colonization associated with urothelial cells from patients with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2054–62.
Price TK, Dune T, Hilt EE, Thomas-White KJ, Kliethermes S, Brincat C, et al. The clinical urine culture: enhanced techniques improve detection of clinically relevant microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(5):1216–1222.
Coorevits L, Heytens S, Boelens J, Claeys G. The resident microflora of voided midstream urine of healthy controls: standard versus expanded urine culture protocols. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;36(4):635–639.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mary Tulke, RN, for her assistance with participant recruitment and sample collection. We thank Noriko Shibata, MS, for her assistance with sample analysis. We also thank Dr. Michael Zilliox and Gina Kuffel of the Loyola Genomics Facility for performing the DNA sequencing.
Funding
This study was supported by NIH grants R21 DK097435 and P20 DK108268, a Falk Foundation grant (LU#202567), and financial support from the Society of Women in Urology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
L. Brubaker—Editorial Stipends: Journal of American Medical Association, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Up To Date; Research Funding: NIH; Board Stipend: American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
A. J. Wolfe—Investigator Initiated Studies: Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs, Inc.; Kimberly Clarke Corp.
E.R. Mueller—Astellas-Advisory Board, Boston Scientific-Advisory Board.
The remaining authors claim no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplemental Figure 1.
Fifteen most abundant bacterial genera detected in catheterized urine (A), vaginal swab (B), and perineal swab (C). The top 15 most abundant bacterial genera for each body site are displayed in standard box-and-whisker plots, with the mean values in diamonds and outliers in dots. (PDF 12 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1B
(PDF 12 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1C
(PDF 12 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fok, C.S., Gao, X., Lin, H. et al. Urinary symptoms are associated with certain urinary microbes in urogynecologic surgical patients. Int Urogynecol J 29, 1765–1771 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3732-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3732-1