Abstract
The dynamic process monitoring is discussed in this paper. Kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) is a nonlinear monitoring method that cannot be applied for dynamic systems. Reduced online KPCA (OR-KPCA)is used for fault detection of dynamic processes, which is developed to built a dictionary according to the process status and then, it update the KPCA model and uses it for process monitoring. Also the Tabu search metaheuristic algorithm is used in order to determine the optimal parameter of the kernel function. In this paper, new approaches for online fault isolation, which is a challenging problem in nonlinear PCA, are formulated. An extension of partial PCA and the elimination sensor identification (ESI) to the case of nonlinear systems are presented in a feature space. The partial OR-KPCA and the elimination sensor identification (ESI-KPCA) are generated based on the OR-KPCA method and they consist of developing a set of sub-models. The sub-models are selected according to a pre-designed fault-to-residual structure matrix and by eliminating sequentially one variable from the set of the variables. The proposed fault isolation methods are applied for monitoring an air quality monitoring network. The simulation results show that the proposed fault isolation methods are effective for KPCA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Qin SJ (2012) Survey on data driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis. Ann Rev Control 36(2):220–234
Wang X, Kruger U, Irwin GW (2005) Process monitoring approach using fast moving window PCA. Ind Eng Chem Res 44(15):5691–5702
Sheriff MZ, Mansouri M, Karim MN, Nounou H, Nounou M (2017) Fault detection using multiscale PCA-based moving window GLRT. J Process Control 54:47–64
Wang H, Qian L, Dougherty E (2010) Inference of gene regulatory networks using S-system: a unified approach. IET Syst Biol 4(2):145–156
Ge Z, Song Z (2007) Process monitoring based on independent component analysis principal component analysis (ICA-PCA) and similarity factors. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(7):2054–2063
Lee JM, Qin SJ, Lee IB (2006) Fault detection and diagnosis based on modified independent component analysis. Aiche J 52(10):3501–3514
Kano M, Tanaka S, Hasebe S, Hashimoto I, Ohno H (2003) Monotoring independent components for fault detection. Aiche J 49(4):969–976
Chiang LH, Russell EL, Braatz RD (2000) Fault diagnosis in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 50(2):243–252
He QP, Qin SJ, Wang J (2005) A new faul diagnosis method using fault directions in Fisher discriminant analysis. Aiche J 51(2):555–571
Yu J (2011) Localized Fisher discriminant analysis based complex chemical process monitoring. Aiche J 57(7):1817–1828
Chen J, Liao CM (2002) Dynamic process fault monitoring based on neural network and PCA. J Process Control 12(2):277–289
Shijian Z, Yongmao X (2005) Multivariate staistical process monitoring using robust nonlinear principal component analysis. Tsinghua Sci Technol 10(5):582–586
Maulud A, Wang D, Romagnolti JA (2006) A multi-scale orthogonal nonlinear strategy for multi-variate statistical process monitoring. J Process Control 16(7):671–683
Sheriff MZ, Karim MN, Nounou MN, Nounou H, Mansouri M (2017) Monitoring of chemical processes using improved multiscale KPCA. In: 4th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CODIT). IEEE, pp 0049–0054)
Baklouti R, Mansouri M, Nounou H, Nounou M, Slima MB, Hamida AB (2017) Fault detection of chemical processes using KPCA-based GLRT technique. In: International conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP). IEEE, pp 1-6
Mansouri M, Nounou M, Nounou H, Karim N (2016) Kernel PCA-based GLRT for nonlinear fault detection of chemical processes. J Loss Prev Process Ind 40:334–347
Lee JM, Yoo C, Lee IB (2004) Fault detection of batch processes using multiway kernel principal component analysis. Comput Chem Eng 28(9):1837–1847
Choi SW, Lee C, Lee JM, Park JH, Lee IB (2005) Fault detection and identification of nonlinear processes based on kernel PCA. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 75(1):55–67
Lee JM, Yoo C, Choi SW, Vanrolleghem PA, Lee IB (2004) Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem Eng Sci 59(1):223–234
Cho JH, Lee JM, Choi SW, Lee D, Lee IB (2005) Fault identification for process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem Eng Sci 60(1):279–288
Cui P, Li J, Wang G (2008) Improved kernel principal component analysis for fault detection. Expert Syst Appl 34(2):1210–1213
Galiaskarov MR, Kurkina VV, Rusinov LA (2017) Online diangnostics of time varying nonlinear chemical processes using moving window kernel principal component analysis and Fisher discriminant analysis. J Chemom 31(8):e2866
Khediri IB, Liman M, Weihs C (2011) Variable window adaptative kernel principal component analysis for nonlinear nonstationary process monitoring. Comput Ind Eng 61(3):437–446
Jaffel I, Taouali O, Harkat MF, Messaoud H (2017) Kernel principal component analysis with reduced complexity for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9-12):3265–3279
Fazai R, Taouali O, Harkat MF, Bouguila N (2016) A new fault detection method for nonlinear process monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9-12):3425–3436
Jaffel I, Taouali O, Harkat MF, Messaoud H (2016) Moving window KPCA with reduced complexity for nonlinear dynamic process monitoring. ISA Trans 64:184–192
Fezai R, Mansouri M, Taouali O, Harkat MF, Bouguila N (2018) Online reduced kernel principal component analysis for process monitoring. J Process Control 61:1–11
Alcala CF, Qin SJ (2010) Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring with kernel principal component analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(17):7849–7857
Kallas M, Mourot G, maquin D, Ragot J (2015) Fault estimation of nonlinear processes using kernel principal component analysis. In: control Conference (ECC), European, IEEE, pp 3197–3202)
Dunia R, Qin SJ, Edgar TF, McAovy TJ (1996) Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. Aiche J 42(10):2797–2812
Gertler J, Cao J (2005) Desiggn of optimal strucured residuals from partial principal component models for fault diagnosis in linear systems. J Process Control 15(5):585–603
Huang Y, Gertler J, McAvoy TJ (2000) Sensor and actuator fault isolation by structured partial PCA with nonlinear extensions. J Process Control 10(5):459–469
Gertler J, Li W, Huang Y, McAvoy T (1999) Isolation enhanced principal component analysis. Aiche J 45(2):323–334
Huang Y, Gertler J, McAvoy TJ (1999) Fault isolation by partial PCA and partial NLPCA. IFAC Proc Vol 32(2):7647–7652
Said M, Fazai R, Adellafou KB, Taouali O (2018) Decentralized fault detection and isolation using bond graph and PCA methods. The International Journal of Advanced Manufaturing Technology, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2526-4
Stork CL, Veltkamp DJ, Kowalski BR (1997) Identification of multiple sensor disturbances during process monitoring. Anal Chem 69(24):5031–5036
Cristianini N, Shawe Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel based learning methods. Cambridge university press, Cambridge
Taouali O, Jaffel I, Lahdhiri H, Harkat MF, Messouad H (2016) New fault detection method based on reduced kernel principal component analysis (RKPCA). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5-8):1547–1552
Honeine P (2015) Approximation errors of online sparsification criteria, IEEE Trans. Signal Process 63(17):4700–4709
Honeine P (2012) Online kernel principal component analysis: reduced order model. IEEE Transactions on Patern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34(9):1814–1826
Gao W, Chen J, Richard C, Huang J (2014) Online dictionary learning for kernel LMS. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(11):2765–2777
Honeine P (2015) Analyzing sparse dictionaries for online learning with kernels. IEEE Trans Signal Process 63(23):6343–6353
Harkat MF, Mourot G, Ragot J (2006) An improved PCA scheme for sensor FDI: application to an air quality monitoring network. J Process Control 16(6):625–634
Harkat MF, Mourot G, Ragot J (2009) Multiple sensor fault detection and isolation of an air quality monitoring network using RBF-NLPCA model. IFAC Proc Vol 42(8):828–833
Downs JJ, Vogel EF (1993) A plant wide industrial process control problem. Comput Chem Eng 17(3):245–255
Rato T, Reis M, Schmitt E, Hubert M, De Ketelare B (2016) A systematic comparison of PCA based Statistical Process Monitoring methods for high-dimensional, time dependent Processes. AIChE J 62(5):1478–1493
Harkat MF, Mansouri M, Nounou M, Nounou H (2018) Enhanced data validation strategy of air quality monitoring network. Environ Res 160:183–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fazai, R., Ben Abdellafou, K., Said, M. et al. Online fault detection and isolation of an AIR quality monitoring network based on machine learning and metaheuristic methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99, 2789–2802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2674-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2674-6