Abstract
It is well-known that the reliability of finite element (FE) simulation results of cutting processes depends mainly on two factors: implementation of a well-defined constitutive model which can properly represent the severe deformation in chip formation process as well as the viability of the relation adopted to simulate the frictional condition at the tool-chip interface. In the current study, a systematic approach is presented to evaluate the performance of various friction models in three different FE commercial codes: Deform 2D, Abaqus/Explicit and AdvantEdge. The frictional condition was analysed for two uncoated cemented carbide-plain carbon steel combinations: K10/AISI 1045 and H13A/AISI 1080. The results indicated that approximately similar ranges of minimum average error in simulation responses can be achieved, independently of the FE code used for simulation of the chip formation process and for both tool-work material combinations. The reasons for this observation were critically discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Guo YB (2003) An integral method to determine the mechanical behavior of materials in metal cutting. J Mater Process Technol 142:72–81
Bouzakis K-D, Michailidis N, Skordaris G, Bouzakis E, Biermann D, M’Saoubi R (2012) Cutting with coated tools: coating technologies, characterization methods and performance optimization. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:703–723
Attanasio A, Ceretti E, Fiorentino A, Cappellini C, Giardini C (2010) Investigation and FEM-based simulation of tool wear in turning operations with uncoated carbide tools. Wear 269:344–350
Malakizadi A, Cedergren S, Surreddi KB, Nyborg L (2013) A methodology to evaluate the machinability of Alloy 718 by means of FE simulation. Presented at the Advanced Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies NEWTECH, Stockholm
Binder M, Klocke F, Lung D (2015) Tool wear simulation of complex shaped coated cutting tools. Wear 330–331:600–607
Özel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:518–530
Kalhori V (2001) Modelling and simulation of mechanical cutting. PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Lulea University of Technology.
Rech J, Arrazola PJ, Claudin C, Courbon C, Pusavec F, Kopac J (2013) Characterisation of friction and heat partition coefficients at the tool-work material interface in cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62:79–82
Svoboda A, Wedberg D, Lindgren LE (2010) Simulation of metal cutting using a physically based plasticity model. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:1–19
Chandrasekaran H, M’Saoubi R, Chazal H (2005) Modelling of material flow stress in chip formation process from orthogonal milling and split Hopkinson bar tests. Mach Sci Technol 9:131–145
Malakizadi A, Cedergren S, Sadik I, Nyborg L (2016) Inverse identification of flow stress in metal cutting process using Response Surface Methodology. Simul Model Pract Theory 60:40–53
Ulutan D and Özel T (2013) Determination of constitutive material model parameters in fe-based machining simulations of Ti-6Al-4V and IN-100 alloys: an inverse methodology. Proc NAMRI/SME. 41.
Daoud M, Jomaa W, Chatelain JF, Bouzid A (2015) A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2019–2033
Del Prete A, Filice L, Umbrello D (2013) Numerical simulation of machining nickel-based alloys. Procedia CIRP 8:540–545
Malakizadi A, Sadik I, Nyborg L (2013) Wear mechanism of CBN inserts during machining of bimetal aluminum-grey cast iron engine block. Procedia CIRP 8:188–193
Xu D, Feng P, Li W, Ma Y (2015) An improved material constitutive model for simulation of high-speed cutting of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy with high accuracy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1043–1053
Yang Y, Zhu W (2014) Study on cutting temperature during milling of titanium alloy based on FEM and experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:1511–1521
Chandrasekaran H, Kapoor DV (1965) Photoelastic analysis of tool-chip interface stresses. J Eng Ind 87:495–502
Childs THC (2006) Friction modelling in metal cutting. Wear 260:310–318
Zemzemi F, Rech J, Ben Salem W, Dogui A, Kapsa P (2009) Identification of a friction model at tool/chip/workpiece interfaces in dry machining of AISI4142 treated steels. J Mater Process Technol 209:3978–3990
Rech J, Claudin C, D’Eramo E (2009) Identification of a friction model—application to the context of dry cutting of an AISI 1045 annealed steel with a TiN-coated carbide tool. Tribol Int 42:738–744
Smolenicki D, Boos J, Kuster F, Roelofs H, Wyen CF (2014) In-process measurement of friction coefficient in orthogonal cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:97–100
Merchant ME (1945) Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys 16:267–275
Usui E, Kikuchi K, Hoshi K (1964) The theory of plasticity applied to machining with cut-away tools. J Eng Ind 86:95–104
Atkins T (2015) Prediction of sticking and sliding lengths on the rake faces of tools using cutting forces. Int J Mech Sci 91:33–45
Zorev NN (1966) Metal cutting mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Hedenqvist P, Olsson M (1991) Sliding wear testing of coated cutting tool materials. Tribol Int 24:143–150
Puls H, Klocke F, Lung D (2014) Experimental investigation on friction under metal cutting conditions. Wear 310:63–71
Hosseinkhani K, Ng E (2015) A combined empirical and numerical approach for tool wear prediction in machining. Procedia CIRP 31:304–309
Hosseinkhani K, Ng E (2013) Analysis of the cutting mechanics under the influence of worn tool geometry. Procedia CIRP 8:117–122
Bil H, Kılıç SE, Tekkaya AE (2004) A comparison of orthogonal cutting data from experiments with three different finite element models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:933–944
Arrazola PJ, Villar A, Ugarte D, Marya S (2007) Serrated chip prediction in finite element modeling of the chip formation process. Mach Sci Technol 11:367–390
Vaz M Jr, Owen DRJ, Kalhori V, Lundblad M, Lindgren LE (2007) Modelling and simulation of machining processes. Arch Comput Methods Eng 14:173–204
Shi B, Attia H (2009) Modeling the thermal and tribological processes at the tool-chip interface in machining. Mach Sci Technol 13:210–226
Puls H, Klocke F, and Veselovac D (2015) FEM-based prediction of heat partition in dry metal cutting of AISI 1045. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 1–9.
Arrazola PJ, Özel TR (2010) Investigations on the effects of friction modeling in finite element simulation of machining. Int J Mech Sci 52:31–42
Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal cutting. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston
Iqbal SA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2007) Characterization of machining of AISI 1045 steel over a wide range of cutting speeds. Part 1: investigation of contact phenomena. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:909–916
Finnie I and S. M. C. (1956) The friction process in metal cutting. Transactions of ASME 78. 78:1649–1657.
Shirakashi T and U. E. (1973) Friction characteristics on tool face in metal machining. J Japan Soc Precis Eng. 39:966–972.
Childs T, Maekawa K, Obikawa T, Yamane Y (2000) Metal machining: theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York
Puls H, Klocke F, Lung D (2012) A new experimental methodology to analyse the friction behaviour at the tool-chip interface in metal cutting. Prod Eng 6:349–354
Bordin A, Imbrogno S, Rotella G, Bruschi S, Ghiotti A, Umbrello D (2015) Finite element simulation of semi-finishing turning of electron beam melted Ti6Al4V under Dry and cryogenic cooling. Procedia CIRP 31:551–556
Jaspers SPFC (1999) Metal cutting mechanics and material behavior. PhD Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Demuth H and Beale M (1993) Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB. MathWorks.
Marusich TD, Ortiz M (1995) Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38:3675–3694
Wang J, Gadala MS (1997) Formulation and survey of ALE method in nonlinear solid mechanics. Finite Elem Anal Des 24:253–269
Halim SMT (2008) Finite element modeling of the orthogonal metal cutting process: modeling the effects of coefficient of friction and tool holding structure on cutting forces and chip thickness. PhD, McMaster University.
Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processing I: cutting, RWTH ed.: Springerlink.
Guo Z, Saunders N, Schillé JP, Miodownik AP (2009) Material properties for process simulation. Mater Sci Eng A 499:7–13
Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2015) 3-D finite element process simulation of micro-end milling Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy: experimental validations on chip flow and tool wear. J Mater Process Technol 221:128–145
Rotella G, Dillon OW Jr, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651 alloy. J Manuf Process 15:87–95
Jafarian F, Imaz Ciaran M, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–121
Sekhon GS, Chenot JL (1993) Numerical simulation of continuous chip formation during non-steady orthogonal cutting. Eng Comput 10:31–48
Iqbal SA, Mativenga PT, Sheikh MA (2007) Characterization of the machining of AISI 1045 steel over a wide range of cutting speeds—part 2: evaluation of flow stress models and interface friction distribution schemes. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 221:917–926
Klocke F, Raedt HW, Hoppe S (2001) 2D-FEM simulation of the orthogonal high speed cutting process. Mach Sci Technol 5:323–340
Ng EG, Aspinwall DK, Brazil D, Monaghan J (1999) Modelling of temperature and forces when orthogonally machining hardened steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:885–903
Bailey JA (1975) Friction in metal machining—mechanical aspects. Wear 31:243–275
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malakizadi, A., Hosseinkhani, K., Mariano, E. et al. Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 3217–3232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9023-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9023-4