Abstract
Purpose
To compare the biomechanical and histological properties of Achilles tendons repaired at different time points during the acute injury period.
Methods
Thirty-six skeletally mature Sprague–Dawley rats underwent bilateral mid-substance Achilles tenotomy. The Achilles tendons were repaired either in the first 24 h (group 1), 24–48 h (group 2), 48–72 h (group 3), or > 72 h (mean: 120 ± 5.2 h) (group 4) after tenotomy. Six weeks after repair, nine tendons per group were assessed biomechanically and histologically. The Stoll histological scoring system was used for histological examination. The groups were compared with each other and native tendons (control group). The correlations between biomechanical and histological results were analysed.
Results
There were no significant differences between groups 1, 2 and 3 regarding the mean load to failure; it was significantly lower in group 4. Healed tendons in groups 1, 2 and 3 had significantly greater stiffness than native tendons and group 4 tendons. All healed tendons had a larger cross-sectional area than native tendons. There was no significant difference in tendon length between the groups. There was no significant difference in Young’s modulus between the groups; Young’s modulus was lower in all the groups than in the control group. Group 1 had significantly higher extracellular matrix organization, cell alignment, cell distribution and nucleus morphology scores and total scores than group 4. Group 1 had significantly higher extracellular matrix organization, cell distribution, vascularization and inflammation scores and total scores than group 3. A significant positive correlation was detected between the maximum load to failure and total histological score.
Conclusion
Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture within 48 h, and especially in the first 24 h, provides better biomechanical and histological outcomes. In the clinical practice, the data could be used to decrease re-rupture rates, to achieve more anatomical tendon healing and to implement more effective post-operative rehabilitation programme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acute Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury affecting 18 per 100,000 individuals each year [22, 32]. It usually occurs during sporting activities due to forced ankle dorsiflexion against the contracted gastrosoleus muscle complex [25]. The rupture typically occurs in the mid-substance of the gastrosoleus tendon complex and is most common in men aged 30–50 years participating in recreational sports [7, 8]. Importantly, the incidence of Achilles tendon rupture is increasing globally [9, 17].
Although associated with high complication rates, surgical treatment is a more common option amongst athletic population for acute Achilles tendon ruptures [27]. Most acute Achilles tendon ruptures are treated non-operatively with the decrease in surgical incidence whilst Achilles tendon ruptures incidence increases [27].
Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to decrease complication rates [7, 10]. A higher re-rupture risk was previously reported following non-operative treatment. However, studies with a high level of evidence have shown that clinical outcomes similar to those of surgical treatment may be possible with standardized non-operative treatment, controlled range of motion exercises, and early weight bearing [13, 20, 25]. More evidence-based treatment protocols are needed due to the increasing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture.
Previous clinical studies have described various repair timepoints, ranging from as soon as possible to within 48 h or 1 week [21]. No differences in functional outcomes have been reported for repairs performed after delays of up to 1 month [3, 18]. In current clinical practice, most Achilles tendon repairs are performed within 1 week after injury [12].
Surgical intervention during the inflammatory phase may negatively impact tendon healing and the post-operative healing period [21]. The clinical effects of delayed repair were previously investigated [1, 21, 29]. However, the effect of early and delayed repair on the biomechanical and histological properties of the healed tendon is unknown. It was hypothesized that tendon healing may be affected by repair time. With the above in mind, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different repair times on Achilles tendon healing in a rat model.
Materials and methods
Animal model
Thirty-six 16-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 400–600 g were included in the experiment. The entire procedure was performed by one orthopaedic surgeon. Bilateral percutaneous achillotomy was performed in all animals. Achilles tendon healing was studied biomechanically in nine tendons per group and nine tendons per group were examined histologically at 6 weeks in the post-repair period. Ten “native tendons” from five rats were used as a control group. Bilateral percutaneous achillotomy was performed 1 cm proximal to the calcaneal tuberosity under general anaesthesia (ketamine and xylazine) with a No. 11 scalpel. Bilateral Achilles tendon repair was performed in the first 24 h in group 1, at 24–48 h in group 2, at 48–72 h in group 3, and at > 72 h in group 4 (mean 120 ± 5.2 h). The repair was performed under general anaesthesia. After a longitudinal skin incision was made, the paratenon was gently opened longitudinally with a No. 15 scalpel. The ruptured Achilles tendon was repaired with a 4-0 Vicryl suture (Ethicon, Sommerville, USA) using the Urbaniak variant of the Kessler technique [19, 26]. Tendon length and cross-sectional area were measured using a high-precision calliper (Fig. 1). Then, the paratenon was repaired primarily (single stitch) with a 4-0 Vicryl suture (Ethicon, Sommerville, USA). The skin was closed using 4-0 Vicryl single stitches. Animals were allowed to move freely in their cages without any immobilization applied to their ankle joints [15]. Animals were euthanized 6 weeks after repair. Bilateral tendons from the study and control rats were harvested with the gastrosoleus muscle and a 5-mm part of calcaneal bone for biomechanical and histological examination (Fig. 1). Tendon lengths were measured and the cross-sectional area was calculated for comparisons.
Biomechanical testing
Tendon length (mm) and diameter (mm) of the samples were measured using a high-precision calliper, and cross-sectional area (mm2) was calculated. Maximal load to failure and stiffness were measured using a mechanical testing machine (AGS-J; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). The calcaneus and muscle belly were fastened to clamps. Ringer’s solution was used to keep the tendons moist. The surface of the proximal and distal clamps was covered with sandpaper to hold the tissue [5]. The displacement rate was set at 1000 mm/min. The force displacement rates were digitally registered and analysed. Maximum load to failure (N), the load at the failure and there is a sudden drop in load after this point, was measured. Tendon stiffness (N/mm), resistance of the tendon to a change in length, was calculated from the linear part of the force–elongation curve and correlated to cross-sectional area (Young’s modulus). Measurement accuracy was 0.1 mm for length and diameter, 0.1 mm2 for cross-sectional area, 0.1 N for load to failure, 0.1 N/mm for tendon stiffness and 0.1 MPa for Young’s modulus.
Histological testing
Nine tendons in each group were fixed in 4% buffered formalin solution (pH 7.4) for 24 h. Then, they were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Parasagittal sections (4-µm thick) of the tendons were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and Safranin O. Five different areas were examined: proximal, distal, medial, lateral and central. Extracellular matrix organization, proteoglycan content, cellularity/extracellular matrix ratio, cell alignment, cell distribution, cell nucleus morphology, metaplasia, vascularity and inflammation were evaluated and total score was calculated in each sample according to a modified Stoll histological scoring system [28]. Two blinded examiners ( histology expert and an orthopaedic surgeon) performed the evaluations. A very good agreement was obtained for histological scores (k > 0.9 for all). The study design was approved by Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Experimental Animals Research Ethics Board (Approval date/number: 09.04.2018/02-13).
Statistical analysis
Results were shown as the mean ± standard deviation. The Kruskal–Wallis test (Student–Newman–Keuls method) was used to compare values amongst the groups. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between biomechanical and histological results. SPSS version 22.0 (IBM corp., Armonk, NY) was used for all statistical analyses. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the histological scores. A sample of nine animals per group was calculated to be necessary to detect a difference in biomechanical and histological measurements, with 0.80 statistical power. The type-1 error rate associated with the null hypothesis was 0.05.
Results
Biomechanical results
There was no significant difference in tendon length between immediately after surgery, 6 weeks after surgery and native tendons (n.s. for all comparisons). At 6 weeks after surgery, the cross-sectional area was larger in all groups than in native tendons (Fig. 2). No significant difference was found between groups 1, 2, 3 and native tendons with respect to mean load to failure. Tendons in group 4 were significantly weaker than those in groups 1, 2 and 3 and native tendons at 6 weeks (Fig. 3). Tendon stiffness was significantly higher in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 than that in native tendons (Fig. 4). No significant difference was found between the study groups when correlated to the cross-sectional area (Young’s modulus). However, the cross-sectional area of native tendons remained significantly higher than that of all study groups (Fig. 5).
Histological results
In terms of the extracellular matrix organization in the tendon, the arrangement of collagen fibrils was disrupted in some places. A statistically significant decrease was observed in groups 3 and 4 compared to group 1 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.038) (Fig. 6).
In terms of cell alignment, the uniaxial tenocytes in the entire tendon were unable to maintain proper alignment in the middle of the tendon, especially around foreign bodies. Alignment was completely disrupted in the areas where metaplasia was observed. In group 4, the score was significantly lower than that in group 1 (p = 0.026) (Fig. 7).
Cell distribution deteriorated in some areas secondary to repair, and focal cell clusters were observed. Group 1 had significantly higher scores than the other groups (p = 0.014, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 regarding group 2, group 3 and group 4, respectively) (Fig. 7).
Changes in cell nucleus morphology were observed at the repair sites, especially in the areas with metaplasia. The score in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 4 (p = 0.021) (Fig. 7).
In the evaluation of vascularity after tendon repair, an increase in vascularity was found especially in the regions of foreign bodies and bone metaplasia. The score in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 3 (p = 0.045) (Fig. 6).
Inflammatory cell infiltration was observed as focal infiltrations that were more pronounced around the foreign body residues. The score in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 3 (p = 0.032). There was also a significantly higher score in group 4 than in group 3 (p = 0.022) (Fig. 6). When total scores were evaluated, group 1 had a significantly higher total score than both group 3 and group 4. When all parameters were evaluated together, the histological structure was closer to the native tendon in repairs performed in the first 24 h (Fig. 6). A significant positive correlation was detected between the maximum load to failure and total histological scores (p = 0.020, r = 0.756).
Discussion
The most important finding of this study was that superior biomechanical and histological outcomes were obtained when repairs were performed in the first 48 h, and especially in the first 24 h. Results significantly worsened when repairs were performed > 72 h after injury. These results show that the timing of repair significantly affects the biomechanical and histological properties of healing tendons.
Previously, concerns have been raised that surgical repair in the inflammatory period might negatively affect tendon healing [21]. The histological phases of the healing of ruptured tendons have been described previously [30, 31]. The first phase is the haemorrhagic phase, which occurs in the first few hours. The gap is filled with a fibrin clot and polymorphonuclear leucocytes and lymphocytes migrate to the area. The inflammatory phase then begins at 24–48 h and is marked by the arrival of macrophages. During the third phase, fibroblasts arrive and begin producing collagen and matrix proteins. All this takes place during the first week after the initial injury. The final phase of healing is remodelling and maturation, which can continue for months. Within 12–14 weeks, a normal collagen composition of the tendon is obtained [23]. In the present study, Achilles tendons were repaired at four time points: within 24 h from injury, 24–48 h from injury, 48–72 h from injury, and > 72 h after injury. The results showed that the best histological and biomechanical outcomes were obtained in repairs performed in the first phase of tendon healing. Performing repairs during the inflammatory phase did not significantly affect the outcomes. Histological and biomechanical properties worsened when repairs were performed during the proliferation phase. These properties deteriorated when the repair was delayed. This finding may be associated with surgery initiating a second inflammation process, disrupting cell proliferation, differentiation and collagen production [11, 14].
Hypocellularity and poor vascularity of tendons affect the healing process [19]. The paratenon is important for supplying blood to the Achilles tendon [4]. The paratenon contains progenitor cells that significantly contribute to the healing of tendons [6]. Closing the paratenon over the tendon in Achilles tendon repair has been recommended to provide better healing and avoid wound healing problems [16, 19, 24]. In the present study, the paratenon was gently opened and closed in all of our repairs to achieve healthy tendon healing and to test our hypothesis in an objective manner.
In the literature, the influence of delayed Achilles tendon repair on patient-reported outcome scores, isokinetic muscle strength and adverse events has been evaluated [21, 29]. Park et al. [21] compared clinical outcomes and isokinetic muscle strength amongst patients who underwent Achilles tendon repair at the following time points: 24 h, 24–48 h and 48 h–1 week after injury. They reported no significant difference amongst the groups in terms of ankle isokinetic muscle strength and clinical outcome scores. The complication rate was low in all groups. In contrast, Svedman et al. [29] reported better clinical outcomes with lower rates of adverse events in patients who underwent Achilles tendon repair within 48 h compared to those who underwent Achilles tendon repair after 72 h. If the biomechanical and histological superiority of repairs performed within the first 48 h compared with after 72 h are interpreted together with the clinical results of Svedman et al. [29], the results of this study appear to support their clinical results.
Some limitations of this study should be discussed. Although immobilization of plantar flexion with early rehabilitation is accepted as a standard therapy in humans, immobilization and physical therapy are not realistic in animal models [12, 15]. Thus, in this study, we did not restrict ankle joint motion or implement early functional physical therapy. As we know, more ruptures are not clear cuts in the clinical practice. Surgical cut is not representative for a typical Achilles tendon rupture, which probably occurs in silently degenerated tendon and is certainly very different from a surgical transection [2]. Biomechanical and histological evaluations were performed at only one time point. The results may have been different if we had performed assessments during earlier phases of healing.
Conclusion
Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture within 48 h, and especially in the first 24 h, provides better biomechanical and histological outcomes. In the clinical practice, the data could be used to decrease re-rupture rates, to achieve more anatomical tendon healing and to implement more effective post-operative rehabilitation programme.
References
Anathallee MY, Liu B, Budgen A, Stanley J (2018) Is Achillon repair safe and reliable in delayed presentation Achilles tendon rupture? A 5-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Surg 24(4):296–299
Backer HC, Wong TT, Vosseller JT (2019) MRI assessment of degeneration of the tendon in Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719845016
Carmont MR, Zellers JA, Brorsson A, Silbernagel KG, Karlsson J, Nilsson-Helander K (2018) No difference in strength and clinical outcome between early and late repair after Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5340-5
Chen TM, Rozen WM, Pan WR, Ashton MW, Richardson MD, Taylor GI (2009) The arterial anatomy of the Achilles tendon: anatomical study and clinical implications. Clin Anat 22(3):377–385
Dogan A, Korkmaz M, Cengiz N, Kalender AM, Gokalp MA (2009) Biomechanical comparison of Achilles tenotomy and achilloplasty techniques in young rats: an experimental study. J Am Pod Med Assoc 99(3):216–222
Dyment NA, Hagiwara Y, Matthews BG, Li Y, Kalajzic I, Rowe DW (2014) Lineage tracing of resident tendon progenitor cells during growth and natural healing. PLoS One 9(4):e96113
Egger AC, Berkowitz MJ (2017) Achilles tendon injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 10(1):72–80
Eliasson P, Agergaard AS, Couppé C et al (2018) The ruptured Achilles tendon elongates for 6 months after surgical repair regardless of early or late weightbearing in combination with ankle mobilization: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 46(10):2492–2502
Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod KW (2016) Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3730–3737
Grassi A, Amendola A, Samuelsson K, Svantesson E, Romagnoli M, Bondi A, Mosca M, Zaffagnini S (2018) Minimally invasive versus open repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: meta-analysis showing reduced complications, with similar outcomes, after minimally invasive surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(22):1969–1981
Guzzoni V, Selistre-de-Araújo HS, Marqueti RC (2018) Tendon remodeling in response to resistance training. Anabolic androgenic steroids and aging. Cells 7(12):E251
Kadakia AR, Dekker RG, Ho BS (2017) Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: an update on treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25(1):23–31
Kauwe M (2017) Acute Achilles tendon rupture: clinical evaluation, conservative management, and early active rehabilitation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 34(2):229–243
Kjaer M, Langberg H, Miller BF et al (2005) Metabolic activity and collagen turnover in human tendon in response to physical activity. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 5(1):41–52
Krapf D, Kaipel M, Majewski M (2012) Structural and biomechanical characteristics after early mobilization in an Achilles tendon rupture model: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Orthopedics 35(9):e1383–e1388
Labib SA, Hoffler CE, Shah JN, Rolf RH, Tingan A (2016) The gift box open aAchilles tendon repair method: a retrospective clinical series. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(1):39–44
Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD (2018) Epidemiology of aAchilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med 6(11):2325967118808238
Maffulli N, Longo UG, Ronga M, Khanna A, Denaro V (2010) Favorable outcome of percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon ruptures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1039–1046
Müller SA, Evans CH, Heisterbach PE, Majewski M (2018) The role of the paratenon in Achilles tendon healing: a study in rats. Am J Sport Med 46(5):1214–1219
Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, van der Velde D, Heng M, van der Meijden O, Groenwold RHH, Houwert RM (2019) Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 364:k5120
Park YH, Jeong SM, Choi GW, Kim HJ (2017) How early must an acute Achilles tendon rupture be repaired? Injury 48(3):776–780
Pedowitz D, Kirwan G (2013) Achilles tendon ruptures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6(4):285–293
Rosenbaum AJ, Wicker JF, Dines JS et al (2010) Histologic stages of healing correlate with restoration of tensile strength in a model of experimental tendon repair. HSS J 6(2):164–170
Saper D, Lybrand K, Creevy W, Li X (2016) Using a posterior compartment fasciotomy and paratenon closure in acute Achilles tendon repair. Orthopedics 39(4):e790–e793
Schipper O, Cohen B (2017) The acute injury of the Achilles: surgical options (open treatment, and minimally invasive surgery). Foot Ankle Clin 22(4):689–714
Sebastin SJ, Ho A, Karjalainen T, Chung KC (2013) History and evolution of the Kessler repair. J Hand Surg Am 38(3):552–561
Sheth U, Wasserstein D, Jenkinson R, Moineddin R, Kreder H, Jaglal SB (2017) The epidemiology and trends in management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study of 27,607 patients. Bone Joint J 99-B(1):78–86
Stoll C, John T, Conrad C et al (2011) Healing parameters in a rabbit partial tendon defect following tenocyte/biomaterial implantation. Biomaterials 32(21):4806–4815
Svedman S, Juthberg R, Edman G, Ackermann PW (2018) Reduced time to surgery improves patient-reported outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med 46(12):2929–2934
Woo SLY, Hildebrand K, Watanabe N, Fenwick JA, Papageorgiou CD, Wang JHC (1999) Tissue engineering of ligament and tendon healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367(Suppl):312–323
Wu F, Nerlich M, Docheva D (2017) Tendon injuries. Basic science and new repair proposals. EFORT Open Rev 2(7):332–342
Wu Y, Lin L, Li H et al (2016) Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Int J Surg 36(Pt A):305–311
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misir, A., Kizkapan, T.B., Arikan, Y. et al. Repair within the first 48 h in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures achieves the best biomechanical and histological outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 2788–2797 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05536-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05536-w