Abstract
Objective
Description of a reproducible surgical technique for single-bundle anterolateral reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on a septum-sparing approach. This technique is less traumatic than the trans-septum approach. The article illustrates surgical steps to simplify the technical aspects of the procedure.
Indications
A complete grade III symptomatic tear of the PCL associated with instability and often discomfort (deceleration, stairs) or subsequent gonalgia arising from the medial compartment or patellofemoral joint. Injury of the peripheral joint stabilizers alongside the PCL including the posterolateral corner or a complete medial knee injury. The procedure is indicated in chronic cases, but also in acute cases of posterior instability > 10 mm, if it is an intraligamentous tear with dislocated PCL stumps.
Contraindications
Bony avulsions of the PCL suitable for refixation, soft tissue compromise, infection, advanced osteoarthritic disease.
Surgical technique
After diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee, the ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are harvested and prepared as a 6-strand graft for PCL reconstruction. One high anterolateral viewing portal, one low anterolateral portal, one anteromedial portal, and a posteromedial portal are used for single-bundle reconstruction via one femoral and one tibial bone tunnel and hybrid graft fixation.
Postoperative management
Weight bearing is restricted to 20 kg for 6 weeks. PCL brace with tibial support for a period of 12 weeks. Flexion is limited to 30° in the first 2 postoperative weeks, then 60° for 2 weeks, and 90° for 2 further weeks. Passive flexion in prone position is performed. Active focused muscle strengthening exercise is begun after 6 weeks postoperatively and participation in competitive sports is not recommended before full muscle strength and coordination is re-established, at the earliest 9–12 months postoperatively.
Results
Two isolated and 19 combined PCL injuries were treated. Mean patient age was 27.4 years, and the minimal follow-up was 12 months. On average, we found good clinical outcome with slight degree of posterior laxity (4.1 mm) after PCL reconstruction in comparison with the contralateral knee. No patient showed signs of effusion at follow-up. Range of motion was fully restored in 19 of 21 patients. One patient suffered failure due to persistent posterior instability and persistence of symptoms.
Zusammenfassung
Operationsziel
Beschreibung einer reproduzierbaren Operationstechnik zur einsträngigen anterolateralen Rekonstruktion des hinteren Kreuzbandes (HBK) auf der Grundlage eines septumerhaltenden Zugangs. Diese Technik ist weniger traumatisch als der transseptale Zugang. Der Beitrag veranschaulicht die Operationsschritte zur Vereinfachung der technischen Aspekte des Verfahrens.
Indikationen
Eine vollständige, drittgradige und symptomatische HBK-Ruptur, verbunden mit einem Instabilitätsgefühl und häufigen Beschwerden (Dezeleration, Treppensteigen) oder anschließender, vom medialen Kompartiment oder Patellofemoralgelenk ausgehender Gonalgie. Verletzung der peripheren Gelenkstabilisatoren neben dem HKB einschließlich der posterolateralen Zone oder eine komplette mediale Knieverletzung. Der Eingriff ist indiziert bei chronischen Fällen, aber auch bei akuter posteriorer Instabilität > 10 mm, wenn es sich um eine intraligamentäre Ruptur mit dislozierten PCL-Stümpfen handelt.
Kontraindikationen
Knöcherne HKB-Ausrisse, die sich refixieren lassen, ausgeprägter Weichteilschaden, Infektion, fortgeschrittene Gonarthrose.
Operationstechnik
Nach diagnostischer Arthroskopie des Kniegelenks Entnahme der ipsilateralen Semitendinosus- und Gracilissehne als 6‑fach-Graft zur HKB-Rekonstruktion. Anlage eines hohen anterolateralen Arthroskopieportals sowie weiterer Arbeitsportale: tief anterolateral, anteromedial und posteromedial. Über die Anlage eines femoralen und eines tibialen Bohrkanals erfolgt die einsträngige Ersatzplastik des HKB mit Hybridfixation des Grafts.
Weiterbehandlung
Teilbelastung 20 kg für 6 Wochen. HKB-Orthese mit tibialer Unterstützung 12 Wochen postoperativ. Flexionslimitierung auf 30° für die ersten 2 Wochen, dann 60° für 2 Wochen, dann 90° für weitere 2 Wochen. Passive Flexion in Bauchlage wird durchgeführt. Training der aktiv-dynamischen Kniegelenkstabilisatoren startet ab der 7. postoperativen Woche. Empfohlen wird, Freizeit- und Wettkampfsport erst wiederaufzunehmen, wenn Kraft und Koordination vollständig wiederhergestellt sind, frühestens 9–12 Monate postoperativ.
Ergebnisse
Zwei isolierte und 19 kombinierte HKB-Verletzungen wurden behandelt. Das durchschnittliche Patientenalter betrug 27,4 Jahre und das minimale Follow-up 12 Monate. Nach HKB-Ersatzplastik fanden wir durchschnittlich gute klinische Ergebnisse mit geringer hinterer Kniegelenklaxizität (4,1 mm) im Vergleich zur gesunden Gegenseite. Bei der Nachuntersuchung zeigte klinisch kein Patient einen Gelenkerguss. Die Beweglichkeit des operierten Kniegelenks war in 19 von 21 Fällen vollständig wieder hergestellt. Ein Patient erlitt ein Graftversagen, was sich anhand einer fortgesetzten posterioren Instabilität und anhaltenden Symptomen bemerkbar machte.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introductory remarks
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction has always been a technically more demanding procedure compared to ACL reconstruction. With the improved understanding of the peripheral knee stabilizers, knee reconstruction is becoming more complex and demands consideration of the four corners of the knee. Therefore, PCL reconstruction frequently represents only a portion of the procedure that should be performed in a simple and efficient technique in a reasonable time [1].
Severe posterior instability > 10 mm due to an insufficient PCL deteriorates knee biomechanics and can lead to posttraumatic arthritis not only in the femorotibal compartments but also in the femoropatellar compartment because patellofemoral joint reaction forces are elevated in a PCL-deficient knee due to the posterior sag of the tibia.
The anterolateral bundle of the PCL is considered to be more important than the thinner posteromedial bundle. Among other passive stabilizers the posteromedial bundle of the PCL becomes taut in knee extension, but the most important function of the PCL is stabilizing the tibia against posterior translation in flexion. Single bundle reconstruction of the anterolateral PCL bundle is accepted as a standard procedure. It can be performed faster than a double bundle PCL reconstruction and this time factor is relevant as these patients often have multiligament injuries.
For PCL reconstruction, opening the septum is not necessary. The trans-septum technique is more traumatic, time-consuming, and endangers the neurovascular structures. The septum sparing technique is presented with focus on certain important landmarks like the champagne-glass drop-off and the shiny white fibers.
Surgical principle and objective
The technique described here is based on a septum-sparing approach for single-bundle anterolateral reconstruction of the PCL that is technically reproducible. The surgical steps to simplify the technical aspects of the procedure are illustrated.
Advantages
The advantage of the reconstruction technique presented here can be seen in the reproducibility and simplicity of the technique, alongside sufficient surgical exposure. A posterolateral portal is not needed, operation time is reduced, and the neurovascular structures are securely spared.
Disadvantages
The method is optimized for a single-bundle reconstruction. Therefore, it is mostly suitable when combined with reconstruction of the posterolateral or posteromedial corner. This allows for restoration of rotational stability. The technique is less suitable for the fixation of bony avulsions.
Indications
-
A complete grade III symptomatic tear of the PCL (Harner classification). It might be associated with discomfort (deceleration, stairs) or subsequent gonalgia arising from the medial compartment or patellofemoral joint [2, 3].
-
Injury of the peripheral joint stabilizers alongside the PCL including the posterolateral corner or a complete medial knee injury.
-
Posterior translation of the proximal tibia > 10 mm (Harner grade III) compared to the contralateral side in posterior stress x‑rays.
-
In the acute setting: complete intraligamentous PCL tear with dislocated ligament stumps and grade III instability (Harner classification).
Contraindications
-
Bony avulsions of the PCL suitable for refixation
-
Soft tissue compromise
-
Infection
-
Advanced osteoarthritic disease
-
Dysfunctional joint
-
Chronic fixated posterior sag: before PCL reconstruction, a reduction by an orthosis for 8 weeks is needed!
Patient information
-
General surgical complications associated with thrombosis and infection, sensation issues around the wound sites.
-
Injury of the neurovascular structures (popliteal artery) that are at risk when reaming the tibial tunnel.
-
Graft re-rupture
-
Donor site morbidity in the case of autogenous graft utility
-
Necessity of a postoperative rehabilitation program
Preoperative workup
-
Patient history must take into account patient symptoms and physical demand.
-
It is important to perform a detailed examination of the knee joint that should include testing the integrity of the PCL by clinically grading posterior translation.
-
Determine the presence of a lateral or medial injury.
-
Evaluate the posterolateral and posteromedial corners. A PCL injury is a combined injury until proven otherwise.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary in the overall workup and is particularly valuable in the acute setting due to its high sensitivity [4].
-
Stress radiographs present an important tool to determine and objectify the location of lesions, especially in the case of multiple ligamentous laxity. Stress radiography help greatly in determining the corner requiring reconstruction in addition to the PCL. A variety of protocols and gapping thresholds have been published throughout the years [5]. Therefore, regardless of the technique used to perform stress radiography, the method should be standardized and repetitively applied [5]. It is recommended to perform stress radiographs for preoperative planning in all nonacute cases.
-
We perform anterior and posterior, lateral and medial stress radiographs of both knees. Regarding the PCL, a posterior translation of the proximal tibia > 10 mm is an indication for reconstruction.
-
For PCL reconstruction, we use the ipsilateral hamstrings. In multiligament injuries, we use allografts (tibialis anterior tendon).
Instruments and implants
Instruments required for the procedure include a blade, a tendon stripper, a 30° scope, an arthroscopy set with trocar, shaver, probe and arthroscopic grasper. A PCL reconstruction set including beath pins, cannulated reamers and aiming devices (many suppliers available). A graft tube set for downsizing of the graft (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA; Fig. 1) is optional. A femoral suspension device for femoral fixation as well as bioabsorbable interference screws and a tibial button are necessary.
Special surgical considerations
In the case of a concomitant injury to the medial or lateral side of the knee requiring simultaneous reconstruction, it would be advisable to start the placement of the peripheral tunnels prior to beginning arthroscopy. This would simplify soft tissue dissection and identification of the peroneal nerve. However, it is important to tension the grafts of the central compartment (PCL) first, prior to tensioning the periphery in order to avoid rotational over-constraint [8].
In multiligament injuries, we do not hesitate to use allograft (tibialis anterior tendon). We do not use intraoperative fluoroscopy, but this is always an option to control certain steps of the procedure, especially to control femorotibial reduction.
Postoperative rehabilitation
Patients are all provided with a functional PCL brace for a period of 12 weeks. This brace ideally provides an anterior force that increases with flexion in order to protect the graft during the phase of integration. Flexion is limited to 30° in the first 2 postoperative weeks, then 60° for 2 weeks, and 90° for 2 further weeks. Passive flexion in prone position is performed. Weight bearing is restricted to 20 kg for 6 weeks. Active focused muscle strengthening exercise is begun 6 weeks postoperatively and participation in competitive sports is not recommended before full muscle strength and coordination is re-established, at the earliest 9 to 12 months postoperatively.
Errors, hazards and complications
It is important to appreciate the posterior neurovascular bundle during the procedure. The most dangerous complication in PCL surgery is iatrogenic injury of the popliteal artery. Avoiding a posterior tibial blowout by ensuring correct placement of the tibial tunnel is important to reduce the risk of injury to the neurovascular bundle. The guidewire must be held in place during reaming to avoid protrusion into the neurovascular bundle. This could be achieved using a spoon, curette, or clamp.
It is essential to avoid injury to the posterior meniscal root. This is most likely to occur with a tibial tunnel that is too proximal. It is therefore important to identify the shiny white fibers of the posterior root of the medial meniscus and to drill the guidewire at a distance that is sufficiently inferior. The tip of the guidewire should therefore be 7 mm distal and lateral to the shiny white fibers [7].
Results
Between January 2017 and December 2018, 21 patients were treated using this technique. All patients presented at 6 and 12 months for postoperative follow-up. The objective International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC-Score) was measured alongside stress radiographs. Failures were noted.
The mean age of the patients was 27.4. Concomitant ligament injuries were found in 19 patients and included the posterolateral corner, ACL, collateral ligaments.
The surgical time was 72 min in isolated PCL reconstruction and 138 min with combined reconstruction of the posterolateral corner (LaPrade technique) and 127 min with combined reconstruction of the posteromedial corner.
Stress X‑rays at last follow-up demonstrated a mean side-to-side posterior translation of 4.1 ± 3.0 mm.
No patient showed signs of effusion at follow-up. Range of motion was fully restored in 19 patients.
One patient suffered failure due to persistent posterior instability and persistence of symptoms.
Overall, the results seemed reproducible with a rather short learning curve. It is known that posterior tibial translation might increase postoperatively over time. This is true especially during the first 12 months postoperatively. A recent study demonstrated no further increasing posterior knee joint laxity in the second year after PCL reconstruction [9]. Finally, we like to emphasize the fact that combined PCL and posterolateral corner injuries are very common and in these highly unstable cases addressing the posterolateral corner injury in addition to PCL reconstruction is important to avoid PCL graft failure [3].
Change history
12 August 2021
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00728-5
References
LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Agel J et al (2010) Outcomes of an anatomic posterolateral knee reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:16–22
Harner CD, Höher J (1998) Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 26:471–482
LaPrade CM, Civitarese DM, Rasmussen MT et al (2015) Emerging updates on the posterior cruciate ligament: a review of the current literature. Am J Sports Med 43:3077–3092
Gross ML, Grover JS, Bassett LW et al (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of the posterior cruciate ligament: clinical use to improve diagnostic accuracy. Am J Sports Med 20:732–737
James EW, Williams BT, LaPrade RF (2014) Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:2644–2657
Petersen W, Zantop T (2010) Die arthroskopische Ersatzplastik des anterolateralen Bündels des hinteren Kreuzbandes in Einzelbündeltechnik mit autologer Semitendinosus‑/Grazilissehne. Oper Orthop Traumatol 22:354–372
Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA et al (2012) Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1936–1945
Moatshe G, Chahla J, Brady AW et al (2018) The influence of graft tensioning sequence on tibiofemoral orientation during bicruciate and posterolateral corner knee ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 46:1863–1869
Gwinner C, Jung TM, Schatka I et al (2019) Posterior laxity increases over time after PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:389–396
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
C. Konrads, S. Döbele, A. Ateschrang, V. Hofmann and S.S. Ahmad declare that they have no competing interests.
For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies performed were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case.
Additional information
Redaktion
W. Petersen, Berlin
Zeichnungen
R. Himmelhan, Mannheim
The original online version of this article was revised: In the initially published online version of the article, the images of Figures 15 and 16 were reversed. We ask you to note the corrected figures and to excuse the error.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konrads, C., Döbele, S., Ateschrang, A. et al. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a septum-preserving technique. Oper Orthop Traumatol 33, 445–455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00708-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00708-9