Abstract
Objective
To investigate the safety and efficacy of LVIS Jr stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) in small-diameter parent arteries and determine the factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Material and Methods
Clinical and imaging data of 130 patients with IAs in small-diameter parent arteries that were treated with LVIS Jr SAC were retrospectively analyzed. Stent apposition was evaluated by high-resolution flat detector CT, and aneurysm embolization density was evaluated using 2D-DSA. Perioperative complications were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine possible factors for incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Results
In this study, 130 patients (60 and 70 patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, respectively) were successfully treated with LVIS Jr SAC. Immediate digital subtraction angiography (DSA) showed that the aneurysm occlusion was Raymond-Roy class I, II, IIIa, and IIIb in 93 (71.5%), 24 (18.5%), 8 (6.2%), and 5 (3.8%) cases, respectively. There were three cases of acute in-stent thrombosis and two cases of severe vasospasm observed during the perioperative period. The 6‑month follow-up angiograms indicated that complete aneurysm occlusion in 122 patients was 79.5% (97/122). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that an aneurysm size > 10.0 mm, parent artery mean diameter < 2.0 mm, and incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck were possible risk factors for incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Conclusion
The LVIS Jr SAC is effective for managing IAs in small-diameter parent arteries. An aneurysm size > 10.0 mm, parent artery mean diameter < 2.0 mm, and incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck are possible risk factors for incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The widespread application of flow diverters (FDs) in interventions for managing intracranial aneurysms poses a serious challenge to traditional stent-assisted coiling (SAC) [1]; however, the emergence of FDs does not signify the end of SAC. The advantages afforded by the use of FDs in the management of acutely ruptured aneurysms and vascular bifurcation aneurysms have not been fully confirmed and stent plus coil remains the first-line choice for clinical application [2, 3]. Unlike that in FDs, the metal trabeculae of conventional intracranial aneurysm stents (such as the Neuroform EZ [Styker, Kalmazoo, MI, USA] and Enterprise [Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA] stents) cannot be easily observed under digital subtraction angiography (DSA) fluoroscopy. In some small-diameter parent arteries, the limited vessel diameter and the strut thickness of stents make it difficult to detect incomplete stent apposition, which is the main cause of acute in-stent thrombosis, long-term in-stent restenosis, and other adverse events [4, 5].
The low-profile visible intraluminal support device junior (LVIS Jr, MicroVention Terumo, Tustin, CA, USA) represents a new generation of self-expanding nickel-titanium braided closed-cell stents. It is available with diameters of 2.5 and 3.5 mm in the native state and can be released through a 0.017-inch microcatheter (Headway-17, MicroVention Terumo, Tustin, CA, USA). Owing to its excellent flexibility, full-length visualization design, and high metal coverage (15–18%), it has been widely used in the SAC of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) [6, 7].
However, there are few clinical studies on the efficacy and complications of LVIS Jr SAC of IAs in small-diameter parent arteries, and the factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion have not been sufficiently explored [8]. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of LVIS Jr SAC of IAs in small-diameter parent arteries and analyzed the factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion, with the aim of providing scientific guidance on the SAC of IAs in small-diameter parent arteries.
Material and Methods
Participants
Clinical and imaging data of patients with IAs who were treated with LVIS Jr SAC at our center from January 2022 to February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: IAs (both ruptured and unruptured) diagnosed by DSA and treated with LVIS Jr SAC. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) simultaneous use of FDs or multiple overlapping stents, 2) combined use of embolic materials other than coils, such as liquid embolic agents (e.g., Onyx®) and 3) combined use of surgical closure.
Clinical and imaging data of enrolled patients were collected, including basic information (e.g., sex, age, preoperative comorbidities, and preoperative mRS score), parent artery characteristics (e.g., mean diameter and diameter ratio), and aneurysm characteristics (e.g., location, size, and dome-to-neck ratio). The mean diameter of the parent artery was defined as the average value of three vessels in the aneurysm neck and beyond 5 mm at both ends. The diameter ratio of the parent artery was defined as the ratio of the diameter of the larger vessel to that of the narrower vessel.
Interventional Procedures
Stent implantation was completed using an angiography system (Artis Zeego, Siemens, Munich, Germany) capable of high-resolution flat detector CT (HR-FDCT), and image postprocessing was performed using the associated workstations (Syngo Workplace and InStudio 3D, Siemens, Munich, Germany). The perioperative medication, aneurysm embolization, and LVIS Jr stent implantation have been described previously [7, 9, 10]. The immediate aneurysm occlusion density and the angles of stenting were evaluated based on 2D-DSA at the working position. The aneurysm occlusion density was evaluated using the modified Raymond-Roy classification as follows [11]: class I complete obliteration; class II residual neck; class IIIa residual aneurysm with contrast within coil interstices and class IIIb residual aneurysm with contrast along the aneurysm wall. The angles of stenting were defined as the angles formed by the extension lines at the two ends of the stent by selecting an appropriate angle to fully deploy the stent.
The HR-FDCT scanning of the stent placement area was performed to observe whether the stent was completely deployed and detect any local deformities or distortions. After stent implantation, HR-FDCT was performed with low-concentration contrast agents and the stent apposition was assessed according to reconstructed images. The parameters and specific procedures for scanning using low-concentration contrast agents were described previously [12]. For patients who did not undergo scanning with low-concentration contrast agents, the HR-FDCT scanning information and 5s-DSA 3D imaging were imported into the postprocessing workstation. Dual-volume imaging technique was used to obtain dual volume reconstructed images of the stent, blood vessel, and vessel wall to assess stent apposition. The parameters and specific procedures for dual volume reconstruction scanning have been described previously [13].
Stent apposition was evaluated by two experienced neurointerventionalists and one imaging physician. The three professionals resolved any discrepancies in opinion by consulting with each other. With reference to the criteria of Li et al. [14] and Kato et al. [15], stent apposition was categorized into complete apposition and incomplete apposition. Incomplete stent apposition was further classified into three types: type I proximal or distal incomplete stent apposition; type II local “crescent” incomplete stent apposition; type III incomplete deployment in long stent segments.
Complications and Follow-up
The perioperative complications were observed and recorded. Serious complications were defined as acute in-stent thrombosis, embolism dislodgement resulting in distal vascular embolization, parenchymal hemorrhage, or aneurysm rerupture hemorrhage. Postoperative outpatient follow-up or follow-up over the telephone was performed regularly, and the patients’ neurological function after aneurysm embolization was evaluated using the mRS. The stent patency rate was observed at the 6‑month postoperative DSA follow-up, and the complete occlusion rate of aneurysms was evaluated using modified Raymond-Roy classification.
Factors Influencing Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion
The patients who underwent HR-FDCT were divided into a complete occlusion group (RR I) and an incomplete occlusion group (RR II, IIIa, and IIIb) according to the results of the 6‑month DSA follow-up. The differences in general data between the two groups were analyzed and compared. For patients with incomplete aneurysm occlusion, with reference to the relevant literature [16,17,18] and based on clinical experience, univariate analysis was performed for the risk factors that might affect aneurysm occlusion, such as the parent artery diameter ratio, parent artery mean diameter, aneurysm size, the angles of stenting, stent apposition, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Factors with a P-value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the possible factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) software. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were compared between groups using the Student’s t-test. Categoric variables are presented as numbers with percentages and were compared between groups by using the χ2-test or Fisher’s exact test. Univariate analysis was used to determine the predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion, and factors with a P-value of < 0.05 were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis for further analysis. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patients and Aneurysms
Overall, 130 patients (60 ruptured and 70 unruptured aneurysms) met the enrolment criteria and were included in this study. Of the patients 20 were excluded including 15 who were treated with concomitant surgical closure or other brands of stents for multiple aneurysms and 5 who were considered to have dissecting aneurysms treated with overlapping double stent implantation or FD implantation. Of the 130 patients 48 (36.9%) were male and 82 (63.1%) were female. The mean age was 58.95 ± 9.69 years. The details are described in Table 1.
Interventional Therapy Outcomes
A total of 130 patients underwent successful LVIS Jr SAC of IAs (technical success rate: 100%) and LVIS Jr stents 23 mm in length and with a diameter of 2.5 mm (89 cases) or 3.5 mm (41 cases) were selected. The mean diameter of the parent artery was 2.34 ± 0.46 mm (Fig. 1). The modified Raymond-Roy classification of aneurysm occlusion as shown by immediate postoperative DSA was as follows: RR I, 93 cases (71.5%); RR II, 24 cases (18.5%); RR IIIa, 8 cases (6.2%); and RR IIIb, 5 cases (3.8%). The details are described in Table 1.
Complications and Follow-up Outcomes
During the perioperative period, acute in-stent thrombosis was noted in three patients in whom the thrombus disappeared after direct intra-arterial thrombolysis (urine plasminogen activator and tirofiban), after which the blood flow was restored. The patients were discharged without residual neurological symptoms. Two patients with a ruptured aneurysm developed severe vasospasm of the parent arteries during the operation, which was relieved after slow perfusion of nimodipine and papaverine; the operations were successfully completed. No other complications such as aneurysm rupture hemorrhage, thromboembolism, or stent and coil migration occurred in the remaining patients.
Of the patients 122 received clinical follow-up; the average follow-up duration was 9.04 ± 2.18 months. Regarding the remaining 8 patients, 6‑month DSA follow-up data were unavailable for these patients or they were lost to follow-up. The follow-up showed that 119 patients (97.5%) had a good prognosis and 3 had residual neurological deficits (mRS score of 3). DSA follow-up for approximately 6 months showed the modified Raymond-Roy classification of aneurysm occlusion as follows: RR I, 97 cases (79.5%); RR II, 16 cases (13.1%); RR IIIa, 6 cases (4.9%); and RR IIIb, 3 cases (2.5%). The complete occlusion rate was 79.5% (97/122) for the aneurysms in these patients. One patient with an anterior communicating artery aneurysm showed recurrence due to compression of the coils in the aneurysm lumen, and follow-up observation was performed for this patient because the family refused further treatment (Fig. 2). In addition, three patients had mild in-stent stenosis but no stent occlusion and did not receive any intervention. The details are described in Table 2.
Factors Influencing Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion
According to whether aneurysm occlusion was complete during the 6‑month follow-up, 66 patients who underwent HR-FDCT were divided into a complete occlusion group (n = 53) and an incomplete occlusion group (n = 13). There were no significant differences in clinical data between the two groups, in terms of parameters such as patient sex, age, preoperative comorbidities, preoperative mRS score, and aneurysm location (all P-values > 0.05) (Table 3). Univariate analysis showed that subarachnoid hemorrhage, parent artery stenosis, parent artery mean diameter, aneurysm size, ascus, immediate aneurysm occlusion, and stent apposition at the aneurysm neck were predictor factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion (all P-values < 0.05) (Table 3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of these factors revealed that an aneurysm size > 10.0 mm, parent artery mean diameter < 2.0 mm, and incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck were possible risk factors for incomplete aneurysm occlusion (Table 4).
Discussion
The results of this study indicated that LVIS Jr stent deployment and apposition were satisfactory in parent arteries with a diameter of < 2 mm. Furthermore, the stent protected the coils at the aneurysm neck and demonstrated an excellent performance. Furthermore, the immediate aneurysm occlusion rate was 71.5% (93/130), which was generally consistent with the results of previous studies [8, 10, 11]. The LVIS Jr stent has high metal coverage (15–18%) and small cell size (< 1.5 mm) and is thus protective for the aneurysm neck and improves the rate of complete occlusion. Regarding the occlusion of small aneurysms, in particular, the LVIS Jr stent effectively prevents the escape of smaller coils during the procedure. The aneurysm neck metal coverage can be increased to 35% by the lantern and push-pull techniques, which play an almost blood flow-diverting role, thereby producing more pronounced hemodynamic effects and improving the healing rate of aneurysms [19,20,21]. Several studies have shown that the LVIS Evo stent can also accurately and safely reach the distal tortuous intracranial artery and has better visibility. Nevertheless, the metal coverage rate of up to 28% also makes it difficult to re-cross the stent, which may increase the incidence of ischemic complications [22, 23]. Further studies are needed to confirm the differences in efficacy and performance between the LVIS Jr and LVIS Evo stents.
In the present study, the perioperative complication rate associated with the LVIS Jr stent was 4.1%, which was similar to that in clinical studies of general LVIS SAC of IAs [22, 24]. Despite the majority of LVIS Jr stents being implanted into parent arteries with a diameter of < 2 mm in this study, the rate of ischemic complications was not significantly high. This may be related to better stent deployment and apposition in parent arteries with a diameter of < 2 mm, which was confirmed by HR-FDCT findings. In addition, all patients underwent preoperative antiplatelet pharmacogenetic testing and an individualized antiplatelet regimen was used, which was another reason for the low incidence of ischemic complications. There were three cases of intraoperative acute in-stent thrombosis, which occurred in patients with atherosclerotic stenosis of the parent artery. These may be attributable to the presence of atherosclerotic stenosis making complete stent apposition difficult, and the formation of eddy currents between the stent and the vessel wall, resulting in the microthrombus.
The 6‑month DSA follow-up showed that the long-term complete occlusion rate of aneurysms in our patients reached 79.5%, which was significantly higher than that in previous studies, such as those by Wang et al. [11] and Lauzier et al. [25] who reported complete occlusion rates of aneurysms of 65.0% and 64.8%, respectively. It is hypothesized that on the one hand, it might be associated with lower blood pressure in parent arteries with a diameter of < 2 mm and the lumen of coil-filled aneurysms being more prone to thrombus formation. On the other hand, it might be related to the blood flow-directing effect of the denser cells and the higher metal coverage of the LVIS Jr stent. In 66 patients who underwent HR-FDCT, the possible factors affecting incomplete aneurysm occlusion were further analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, which showed that an aneurysm size of > 10.0 mm, parent artery mean diameter < 2.0 mm, and incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck were possible factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion; however, the sample size for multivariate analysis was small, and only 13 aneurysms were incompletely occluded, which could not fully meet the principle of 10 events per variable. Therefore, the results may not be robust enough for multivariate analysis and need to be further verified using larger samples; however, we believe the results still have some guiding significance.
There were 5 cases (38.5%) in which the aneurysm size was > 10.0 mm in patients with incomplete aneurysm occlusion. The reason may be the fact that the metal coverage of LVIS Jr stent, although 15–18%, is still insufficient to change the hemodynamics of larger aneurysms. Secondly, larger aneurysms are mostly wide-neck aneurysms, and the coils in the aneurysm lumen are prone to compression due to the impact of the blood flow. Furthermore, the occurrence of inflammatory reactions leads to further expansion of the residual aneurysm lumen owing to thrombolysis, thus leading to long-term incomplete aneurysm occlusion. Therefore, for larger aneurysms, the metal coverage of the aneurysm neck should be increased as much as possible by using the push-pull or lantern techniques to minimize the impact of blood flow. Parent artery mean diameter of < 2.0 mm is a possible risk factor for incomplete aneurysm occlusion. The reason may be the fact that the LVIS Jr stent is mostly recommended in vessels with a diameter of 2–3 mm. Because of its braiding properties, the stent is extruded and stretched during its release in vessels with a diameter of < 2.0 mm, resulting in decreased metal coverage, increased cell size, and weakened blood flow-diverting effect. These factors have a low impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics, thus causing long-term incomplete aneurysm occlusion. Furthermore, several clinical studies have confirmed that stent apposition is closely related to the stent endothelialization process. Muhl-Benninghaus et al. [26] reported that in rabbit models of saccular aneurysms at the aortic arch that were treated with FDs, stent apposition was observed on intraprocedural 2D-DSA and histopathological testing. The results indicated that whether the stent apposition was complete or not was closely correlated with aneurysm occlusion. Although the LVIS Jr stent with its braided design had significantly improved stent apposition compared with the laser-cut stents, in this study, we found that a larger parent artery diameter ratio and the angles of stenting still resulted in a certain degree of incomplete stent apposition, thereby affecting the stent endothelialization process at the aneurysm neck and incomplete occlusion of aneurysms. These findings suggest that we should still pay great attention to LVIS Jr stent apposition in aneurysms with larger angles or diameter ratios of the parent arteries, and if necessary, push-pull or microguidewire massage should be employed to enhance stent apposition.
Our study has several limitations. First, this study is a single-center retrospective study and there is a selection bias for stents and coils. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study is required to further confirm their safety and efficacy. Second, the sample size of this study is small and does not fully satisfy the requirements of events per variable. Therefore, the results may not be sufficiently robust and their reliability needs to be corroborated in further studies. Third, it was not possible to standardize and systematically evaluate the activated prothrombin time in each enrolled patient, which may have an impact on the study results. Fourth, the follow-up period was short, and long-term DSA results after SAC were not observed.
Conclusion
The LVIS Jr SAC is effective for the management of IAs in small diameter parent arteries. An aneurysm size > 10.0 mm, parent artery mean diameter < 2.0 mm, and incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck are possible risk factors influencing incomplete aneurysm occlusion.
Abbreviations
- FD:
-
Flow diverter
- HR-FDCT:
-
High-resolution flat detector computed tomography
- IA:
-
Intracranial aneurysm
- LVIS Jr:
-
Low-profile visualized intraluminal support junior
- SAC:
-
Stent-assisted coiling
References
Oh HS, Bae JW, Hong CE, et al. Stent-assisted coil embolization versus flow-diverting stent in unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: Efficacy and safety comparison. Neurosurgery. 2023;93:120–7. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002384.
Park KY, Kim BM, Kim DJ, et al. Y‑configuration stenting for coiling of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using low-profile visualized intraluminal support junior. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:400–404 https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014128
Wang C, Dong L, Liu J, et al. Pipeline embolization device versus atlas stent assisted coiling for intracranial aneurysm treatment: A retrospective, propensity score matched study with a focus on midterm outcomes and hospital costs. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020173.
Wang N, Lu Y, Feng L, et al. Identifying risk factors for in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1170110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1170110.
Zhang K, Li TX, Wang ZL, et al. Factors affecting in-stent restenosis after angioplasty with the enterprise stent for intracranial atherosclerotic diseases. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89670-x.
McEachern J, Iancu D, van Adel B, et al. Long term safety and effectiveness of lvis jr for treatment of intracranial aneurysms—a canadian multicenter registry. Interv Neuroradiol. 2023;29:134–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221077588.
Poncyljusz W, Zwarzany L, Limanowka B, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of unruptured mca aneurysms using the lvis jr. Device: A multicenter registry. J Clin Med. 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103168.
Kim J, Han HJ, Lee W, et al. Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using low-profile stents in small parent arteries. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:1621–6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7196.
Endo H, Mitome-Mishima Y, Suzuki K, et al. Long-term outcomes of y‑stent-assisted coil embolization using low-profile visualized intraluminal support junior (lvis jr) for intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;217:107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107275.
Liu C, Guo K, Wu X, et al. Utility of low-profile visualized intraluminal support (lvis) stent for treatment of acutely ruptured bifurcation aneurysms: A single-center study. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1050369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1050369.
Wang C, Wu Y, Feng Z, et al. Preliminary experience with the use of low profile visualized intraluminal support device in basilar artery for aneurysm treatment. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:405–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014393.
Li T, Wang Y, Ma J, et al. Application of high-resolution flat detector computed tomography in stent implantation for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:655594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.655594.
Li TF, Shi CC, Ma J, et al. Clinical study of high-resolution c‑arm ct in mechanical recanalization and stent implantation for chronic cerebral artery occlusion. Neurol India. 2022;70:694–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.344607.
Li TF, Ma J, Han XW, et al. Application of high-resolution c‑arm ct combined with streak metal artifact removal technology for the stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1752–8. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6190.
Kato N, Yuki I, Ishibashi T, et al. Visualization of stent apposition after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using high resolution 3d fusion images acquired by c‑arm ct. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:192–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014966.
Martinez-Galdamez M, Orlov K, Kadziolka K, et al. Safety and efficacy of intracranial aneurysm embolization using the “combined remodeling technique”: Low-profile stents delivered through double lumen balloons: A multicenter experience. Neuroradiology. 2019;61:1067–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02240-x.
Murai S, Hiramatsu M, Takasugi Y, et al. Metal artifact reduction algorithm for image quality improvement of cone-beam ct images of medium or large cerebral aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil embolization. Neuroradiology. 2020;62:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02297-8.
Tong X, Han M, Wu Z, et al. Effects of different stent size selection on pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2023;16:17562864231151475. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864231151475.
Caton MT, Copelan AZ, Narsinh KH, et al. The geometry of y‑stent configurations used for wide-necked aneurysm treatment: Analyzing double-barrel stents in vitro using flat-panel computed tomography. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:e363–e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.042.
Lauzier DC, Root BK, Chatterjee AR, et al. Need for y‑stenting in stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023;229:107748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107748.
Sato H, Haraguchi K. Comparison of stent-assisted coiling for unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms between lvis or lvis jr. And enterprise vrd: A retrospective and single-center analysis. Turk Neurosurg. 2021;31:379–84. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.31089-20.2.
Aydin K, Puthuran M, Onal Y, et al. The angiographic and clinical follow-up outcomes of the wide-necked and complex intracranial aneurysms treated with lvis evo-assisted coiling. Neurosurgery. 2023;92:827–36. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002283.
Maurer CJ, Berlis A, Maus V, et al. Treatment of broad-based intracranial aneurysms with the lvis evo stent: A retrospective observational study at two centers with short- and medium-term follow-up. Sci Rep. 2023;13:7232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34270-0.
Davidov V, Sadrameli S, Desai V, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of low-profile visual intraluminal support device: A single center five-year experience. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2021;18:279–86. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567202618666210910123134.
Di RY, Ge L, Lu G, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms: Comparison of lvis and neuroform stents. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;83:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.047.
Muhl-Benninghaus R, Abboud R, Ding A, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the accero stent: Flow remodelling effect on aneurysm, vessel reaction and side branch patency. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42:1786–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-019-02345-z.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81801806); Henan Provincial and Ministerial Co-construction Youth Project of Medical Science and Technology Research Plan (grant number YXKC2022029); and the Medical Science and Technology Project for Health Commission of Henan Province (grant number KYDZ2020120441).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Shuailong Shi. Data curation: Qi tian. Formal analysis: Shuhai Long. Funding acquisition: Tengfei Li. Investigation: Jie Yang, Xinwei Han. Methodology: Shuailong Shi. Project administration: Ji Ma. Resources: Tengfei Li. Software: Fangfang Hui. Supervision: Ji Ma, Xinwei Han. Validation: Ye Wang. Visualization: Zhuangzhuang Wei. Writing-original draft: Shuailong Shi. Writing-review and editing: Tengfei Li.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S. Shi, S. Long, F. Hui, Q. Tian, Z. Wei, J. Ma, J. Yang, Y. Wang, X. Han and T. Li certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical standards
This retrospective observational study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution and complied with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, S., Long, S., Hui, F. et al. Safety and Efficacy of LVIS Jr Stent-assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms in Small-diameter Parent Arteries. Clin Neuroradiol 34, 587–595 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01397-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01397-0