Abstract
Cohomological techniques within the Batalin-Vilkovisky (BV) extension of the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) formalism have proved invaluable for classifying consistent deformations of gauge theories. In this work we investigate the application of this idea to massive field theories in the Stueckelberg formulation. Starting with a collection of free massive vectors, we show that the cohomological method reproduces the cubic and quartic vertices of massive Yang-Mills theory. In the same way, taking a Fierz-Pauli graviton on a maximally symmetric space as the starting point, we are able to recover the consistent cubic vertices of nonlinear massive gravity. The formalism further sheds light on the characterization of Stueckelberg gauge theories, by demonstrating for instance that the gauge algebra of such models is necessarily Abelian and that they admit a Born-Infeld-like formulation in which the action is simply a combination of the gauge-invariant structures of the free theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S.N. Gupta, Gravitation and electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 1683 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B988.
S. Deser, Selfinteraction and gauge invariance, Gen. Rel. Grav. 1 (1970) 9 [gr-qc/0411023] [INSPIRE].
R.P. Feynman, Feynman lectures on gravitation, Penguin Press Science, U.K. (1999).
F.A. Berends, G.J.H. Burgers and H. van Dam, On the theoretical problems in constructing interactions involving higher spin massless particles, Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985) 295 [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and M. Henneaux, Consistent couplings between fields with a gauge freedom and deformations of the master equation, Phys. Lett. B 311 (1993) 123 [hep-th/9304057] [INSPIRE].
I.A. Batalin and G.A. Vilkovisky, Gauge algebra and quantization, Phys. Lett. 102B (1981) 27 [INSPIRE].
I.A. Batalin and G.A. Vilkovisky, Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2567 [Erratum ibid. D 30 (1984) 508] [INSPIRE].
C. Becchi, A. Rouet and R. Stora, Renormalization of gauge theories, Annals Phys. 98 (1976) 287 [INSPIRE].
I.V. Tyutin, Gauge invariance in field theory and statistical physics in operator formalism, arXiv:0812.0580 [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald, Spin-2 fields and general covariance, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3613 [INSPIRE].
C. Cutler and R.M. Wald, A new type of gauge invariance for a collection of massless spin-2 fields. 1. Existence and uniqueness, Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 1267 [INSPIRE].
B. de Wit and J.W. van Holten, Covariant quantization of gauge theories with open gauge algebra, Phys. Lett. 79B (1978) 389 [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, F. Brandt and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories, Phys. Rept. 338 (2000) 439 [hep-th/0002245] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, F. Brandt and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in the antifield formalism. 1. General theorems, Commun. Math. Phys. 174 (1995) 57 [hep-th/9405109] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, F. Brandt and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in the antifield formalism. II. Application to Yang-Mills theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 174 (1995) 93 [hep-th/9405194] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich et al., Deformations of vector-scalar models, JHEP 02 (2018) 064 [arXiv:1712.08126] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and N. Boulanger, A note on local BRST cohomology of Yang-Mills type theories with free abelian factors, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 052302 [arXiv:1802.03619] [INSPIRE].
N. Boulanger, T. Damour, L. Gualtieri and M. Henneaux, Inconsistency of interacting, multigraviton theories, Nucl. Phys. B 597 (2001) 127 [hep-th/0007220] [INSPIRE].
N. Boulanger and M. Henneaux, A derivation of Weyl gravity, Annalen Phys. 10 (2001) 935 [hep-th/0106065] [INSPIRE].
N. Boulanger, B. Julia and L. Traina, Uniqueness of \( \mathcal{N}=2 \) and 3 pure supergravities in 4D, JHEP 04 (2018) 097 [arXiv:1802.02966] [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, G. Lucena Gómez and R. Rahman, Higher-spin fermionic gauge fields and their electromagnetic coupling, JHEP 08 (2012) 093 [arXiv:1206.1048] [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, G. Lucena Gómez and R. Rahman, Gravitational interactions of higher-spin fermions, JHEP 01 (2014) 087 [arXiv:1310.5152] [INSPIRE].
C. Bizdadea and S.-O. Saliu, Gauge-invariant massive BF models, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 65 [arXiv:1511.04684] [INSPIRE].
C. Bizdadea and S.-O. Saliu, A novel mass generation scheme for an Abelian vector field, arXiv:1603.02543 [INSPIRE].
T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, A Stuckelberg formalism for the gravitino from warped extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 536 (2002) 277 [hep-th/0203120] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi and M.D. Schwartz, Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space, Annals Phys. 305 (2003) 96 [hep-th/0210184] [INSPIRE].
Yu. M. Zinoviev, On massive spin 2 interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 770 (2007) 83 [hep-th/0609170] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham and G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli Action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Resummation of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv:1011.1232] [INSPIRE].
S.F. Hassan and R.A. Rosen, On non-linear actions for massive gravity, JHEP 07 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1103.6055] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A.J. Tolley, Ghost free massive gravity in the Stückelberg language, Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 190 [arXiv:1107.3820] [INSPIRE].
R. Rahman, Helicity-1/2 mode as a probe of interactions of a massive Rarita-Schwinger field, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 065030 [arXiv:1111.3366] [INSPIRE].
S.F. Hassan, A. Schmidt-May and M. von Strauss, Proof of consistency of nonlinear massive gravity in the Stückelberg formulation, Phys. Lett. B 715 (2012) 335 [arXiv:1203.5283] [INSPIRE].
G. Gabadadze, K. Hinterbichler, D. Pirtskhalava and Y. Shang, Potential for general relativity and its geometry, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 084003 [arXiv:1307.2245] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte and A. Khmelnitsky, Reduced massive gravity with two Stückelberg fields, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064053 [arXiv:1303.4958] [INSPIRE].
J. Noller, J.H.C. Scargill and P.G. Ferreira, Interacting spin-2 fields in the Stückelberg picture, JCAP 02 (2014) 007 [arXiv:1311.7009] [INSPIRE].
X. Gao, T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yoshida, Covariant Stückelberg analysis of de Rham-Gabadadze-Tolley massive gravity with a general fiducial metric, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124073 [arXiv:1409.3074] [INSPIRE].
I.L. Buchbinder, T.V. Snegirev and Yu. M. Zinoviev, Lagrangian formulation of the massive higher spin supermultiplets in three dimensional space-time, JHEP 10 (2015) 148 [arXiv:1508.02829] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler and M. Saravani, Stückelberg approach to quadratic curvature gravity and its decoupling limits, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 065006 [arXiv:1508.02401] [INSPIRE].
Yu. M. Zinoviev, Massive two-column bosonic fields in the frame-like formalism, Nucl. Phys. B 913 (2016) 301 [arXiv:1607.08476] [INSPIRE].
Y.M. Zinoviev, On massive super(bi)gravity in the constructive approach, arXiv:1805.01650 [INSPIRE].
D.S. Kaparulin, S.L. Lyakhovich and A.A. Sharapov, Consistent interactions and involution, JHEP 01 (2013) 097 [arXiv:1210.6821] [INSPIRE].
I. Cortese, R. Rahman and M. Sivakumar, Consistent non-minimal couplings of massive higher-spin particles, Nucl. Phys. B 879 (2014) 143 [arXiv:1307.7710] [INSPIRE].
I. Cortese and M. Kulaxizi, General Backgrounds for higher spin massive particles, arXiv:1711.11535 [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R.A. Rosen, Massive spin-2 scattering and asymptotic superluminality, JHEP 03 (2018) 051 [arXiv:1708.05716] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser and R.I. Nepomechie, Gauge invariance versus masslessness in de Sitter space, Annals Phys. 154 (1984) 396 [INSPIRE].
S. Deser and A. Waldron, Gauge invariances and phases of massive higher spins in (A)dS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 031601 [hep-th/0102166] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser and A. Waldron, Partial masslessness of higher spins in (A)dS, Nucl. Phys. B 607 (2001) 577 [hep-th/0103198] [INSPIRE].
G. Gabadadze and A. Iglesias, Special massive spin-2 on de Sitter space, JCAP 02 (2008) 014 [arXiv:0801.2165] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, K. Hinterbichler, R.A. Rosen and A.J. Tolley, Evidence for and obstructions to nonlinear partially massless gravity, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 024003 [arXiv:1302.0025] [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, Consistent interactions between gauge fields: the cohomological approach, Contemp. Math. 219 (1998) 93 [hep-th/9712226] [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of gauge systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton U.S.A. (1992).
S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields. Volume 2: modern applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1996).
J. Gomis, J. Paris and S. Samuel, Antibracket, antifields and gauge theory quantization, Phys. Rept. 259 (1995) 1 [hep-th/9412228] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical aspects of massive gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [arXiv:1105.3735] [INSPIRE].
G. Goon, A. Joyce and M. Trodden, Spontaneously broken gauge theories and the coset construction, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 025022 [arXiv:1405.5532] [INSPIRE].
G. Goon et al., Einstein gravity, massive gravity, multi-gravity and nonlinear realizations, JHEP 07 (2015) 101 [arXiv:1412.6098] [INSPIRE].
M. Lagos et al., Noether identities and gauge-fixing the action for cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 024034 [arXiv:1311.3828] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, M. Henneaux and R. Tatar, Consistent interactions between gauge fields and the local BRST cohomology: the example of Yang-Mills models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 3 (1994) 139 [hep-th/9307155] [INSPIRE].
Yu.M. Zinoviev, Gravitational cubic interactions for a massive mixed symmetry gauge field, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 015013 [arXiv:1107.3222] [INSPIRE].
Yu.M. Zinoviev, Massive spin-2 in the Fradkin-Vasiliev formalism. I. Partially massless case, Nucl. Phys. B 886 (2014) 712 [arXiv:1405.4065] [INSPIRE].
Yu. M. Zinoviev, Towards the Fradkin-Vasiliev formalism in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 910 (2016) 550 [arXiv:1606.02922] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Slavnov and L.D. Faddeev, Invariant perturbation theory for non-linear chiral lagrangian, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 8 (1971) 297 [INSPIRE].
N. Boulanger, A. Campoleoni and I. Cortese, Dual actions for massless, partially-massless and massive gravitons in (A)dS, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 285 [arXiv:1804.05588] [INSPIRE].
Yu. M. Zinoviev, All spin-2 cubic vertices with two derivatives, Nucl. Phys. B 872 (2013) 21 [arXiv:1302.1983] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, Massive gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 7 [arXiv:1401.4173] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Positive signs in massive gravity, JHEP 04 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1601.04068] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler and R.A. Rosen, Positivity constraints for pseudolinear massive spin-2 and vector Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104001 [arXiv:1607.06084] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, Beyond positivity bounds and the fate of massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 161101 [arXiv:1710.02539] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville and A.J. Tolley, Improved positivity bounds and massive gravity, JHEP 04 (2018) 083 [arXiv:1710.09611] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R.A. Rosen, Massive and massless spin-2 scattering and asymptotic superluminality, JHEP 06 (2018) 075 [arXiv:1712.10020] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio and K. Hinterbichler, Bounds on amplitudes in effective theories with massive spinning particles, arXiv:1804.08686 [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, S. Melville, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for massive spin-1 and spin-2 fields, arXiv:1804.10624 [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham and S. Renaux-Petel, Massive gravity on de Sitter and unique candidate for partially massless gravity, JCAP 01 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1206.3482] [INSPIRE].
S.F. Hassan, A. Schmidt-May and M. von Strauss, On partially massless bimetric gravity, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 834 [arXiv:1208.1797] [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, M. Sandora and A. Waldron, Nonlinear partially massless from massive gravity?, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 101501 [arXiv:1301.5621] [INSPIRE].
E. Joung, W. Li and M. Taronna, No-go theorems for unitary and interacting partially massless spin-two fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091101 [arXiv:1406.2335] [INSPIRE].
S. Garcia-Saenz and R.A. Rosen, A non-linear extension of the spin-2 partially massless symmetry, JHEP 05 (2015) 042 [arXiv:1410.8734] [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, Ghost-free derivative interactions for a massive graviton, JHEP 10 (2013) 102 [arXiv:1305.7227] [INSPIRE].
J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler and L.A. Johnson, Pseudo-linear spin-2 interactions, arXiv:1806.00483 [INSPIRE].
S. Garcia-Saenz et al., No-go for partially massless spin-2 Yang-Mills, JHEP 02 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1511.03270] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1806.04695
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boulanger, N., Deffayet, C., Garcia-Saenz, S. et al. Consistent deformations of free massive field theories in the Stueckelberg formulation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)021
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)021