Abstract
A coherent study of e+e− annihilation into two (π+π−, K+K−) and three (π+π−π0, π+π−η) pseudoscalar meson production is carried out within the framework of resonance chiral theory in energy region E ≲ 2 GeV. The work of [L.Y. Dai, J. Portolés, and O. Shekhovtsova, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 056001] is revisited with the latest experimental data and a joint analysis of two pseudoscalar meson production. Hence, we evaluate the lowest order hadronic vacuum polarization contributions of those two and three pseudoscalar processes to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. We also estimate some higher-order additions led by the same hadronic vacuum polarization. Combined with the other contributions from the standard model, the theoretical prediction differs still by (21.6 ± 7.4) × 10−10 (2.9σ) from the experimental value.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1979) 327 [INSPIRE].
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Annals phys. 158 (1984) 142 [INSPIRE].
G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, The role of resonances in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989) 311 [INSPIRE].
G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Chiral Lagrangians for massive spin 1 fields, Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 425 [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 139 [hep-ph/0603205] [INSPIRE].
J. Portoles, Basics of resonance chiral theory, AIP Conf. Proc. 1322 (2010) 178 [arXiv:1010.3360] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nucl. Phys. B 75 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Baryons in the 1/n expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 57.
M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler, Resonance estimates of O(p6) low-energy constants and QCD short distance constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001) 659 [hep-ph/0106034] [INSPIRE].
P.D. Ruiz-Femenia, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Odd intrinsic parity processes within the resonance effective theory of QCD, JHEP 07 (2003) 003 [hep-ph/0306157] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, A. Pich and J. Portoles, The 〈VAP〉 Green function in the resonance region, Phys. Lett. B 596 (2004) 96 [hep-ph/0404004] [INSPIRE].
V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portoles, The 〈SPP〉 Green function and SU(3) breaking in K(l3) decays, JHEP 04 (2005) 006 [hep-ph/0503108] [INSPIRE].
T. Husek and S. Leupold, Two-hadron saturation for the pseudoscalar-vector-vector correlator and phenomenological applications, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 586 [arXiv:1507.00478] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Dai, J. Fuentes-Martín and J. Portolés, Scalar-involved three-point Green functions and their phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 114015 [arXiv:1902.10411] [INSPIRE].
T. Kadavý, K. Kampf and J. Novotny, OPE of Green functions of chiral currents, JHEP 10 (2020) 142 [arXiv:2006.13006] [INSPIRE].
Z.H. Guo, J.J. Sanz Cillero and H.Q. Zheng, Partial waves and large Nc resonance sum rules, JHEP 06 (2007) 030 [hep-ph/0701232] [INSPIRE].
M. Jamin, A. Pich and J. Portoles, What can be learned from the belle spectrum for the decay τ− → ντKSπ−, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 78 [arXiv:0803.1786] [INSPIRE].
D.G. Dumm, P. Roig, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Hadron structure in τ → KKπντ decays, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034031 [arXiv:0911.2640] [INSPIRE].
D.G. Dumm, P. Roig, A. Pich and J. Portoles, τ → πππντ decays and the a1(1260) off-shell width revisited, Phys. Lett. B 685 (2010) 158 [arXiv:0911.4436] [INSPIRE].
Z.-H. Guo and P. Roig, One meson radiative tau decays, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 113016 [arXiv:1009.2542] [INSPIRE].
R. Escribano, S. Gonzalez-Solis and P. Roig, τ− → K−η(′)ντ decays in chiral perturbation theory with Resonances, JHEP 10 (2013) 039 [arXiv:1307.7908] [INSPIRE].
I.M. Nugent, T. Przedzinski, P. Roig, O. Shekhovtsova and Z. Was, Resonance chiral lagrangian currents and experimental data for τ− → π−π−π+ντ, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 093012 [arXiv:1310.1053] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Miranda and P. Roig, New τ-based evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the vacuum polarization piece of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 114017 [arXiv:2007.11019] [INSPIRE].
Y.-H. Chen, Z.-H. Guo and H.-Q. Zheng, Study of η-η′ mixing from radiative decay processes, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054018 [arXiv:1201.2135] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Xiao, T. Dato, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, U.G. Meißner and A. Wirzba, Towards an improved understanding of η → γ*γ*, arXiv:1509.02194 [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Dai, X.-W. Kang, U.-G. Meißner, X.-Y. Song and D.-L. Yao, Amplitude analysis of the anomalous decay η′ → π+π−γ, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 036012 [arXiv:1712.02119] [INSPIRE].
S. Dubinsky, A. Korchin, N. Merenkov, G. Pancheri and O. Shekhovtsova, Final-state radiation in electron-positron annihilation into a pion pair, Eur. Phys. J. C 40 (2005) 41 [hep-ph/0411113] [INSPIRE].
L.Y. Dai, J. Portoles and O. Shekhovtsova, Three pseudoscalar meson production in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 056001 [arXiv:1305.5751] [INSPIRE].
F. Niecknig, B. Kubis and S.P. Schneider, Dispersive analysis of ω → 3π and ϕ → 3π decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2014 [arXiv:1203.2501] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Schneider, B. Kubis and F. Niecknig, The ω → π0γ* and ϕ → π0γ* transition form factors in dispersion theory, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 054013 [arXiv:1206.3098] [INSPIRE].
I.V. Danilkin et al., Dispersive analysis of ω/ϕ → 3π, πγ*, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094029 [arXiv:1409.7708] [INSPIRE].
M. Albaladejo and B. Moussallam, Extended chiral khuri-Treiman formalism for η → 3π and the role of the a0(980), f0(980) resonances, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 508 [arXiv:1702.04931] [INSPIRE].
T. Isken, B. Kubis, S.P. Schneider and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relations for η′ → ηππ, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 489 [arXiv:1705.04339] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, S. Lanz, H. Leutwyler and E. Passemar, Dispersive analysis of η → 3π, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 947 [arXiv:1807.11937] [INSPIRE].
D.-L. Yao, L.-Y. Dai, H.-Q. Zheng and Z.-Y. Zhou, A review on partial-wave dynamics with chiral effective field theory and dispersion relation, arXiv:2009.13495 [INSPIRE].
muon g-2 collaboration, Final report of the muon E821 Anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
particle data group collaboration, Review of particle physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
F. Jegerlehner, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Springer, Germany (2017) [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Complete tenth-order QED Contribution to the muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111808 [arXiv:1205.5370] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Theory of the anomalous magnetic Moment of the electron, Atoms 7 (2019) 28 [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw and S. Weinberg, Weak interaction corrections to the muon magnetic moment and to muonic atom energy levels, Phys. Rev. D 5 (1972) 2396 [INSPIRE].
M. Knecht, S. Peris, M. Perrottet and E. De Rafael, Electroweak hadronic contributions to the muon (g − 2), JHEP 11 (2002) 003 [hep-ph/0205102] [INSPIRE].
A. Czarnecki, W.J. Marciano and A. Vainshtein, Refinements in electroweak contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 073006 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 119901] [hep-ph/0212229] [INSPIRE].
C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The electroweak contributions to (g − 2)μ after the Higgs boson mass measurement, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 053005 [arXiv:1306.5546] [INSPIRE].
J. Prades, E. de Rafael and A. Vainshtein, The hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon and electron anomalous magnetic moments, Adv. Ser. Direct. High energy phys. 20 (2009) 303 [arXiv:0901.0306] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub and P. Stoffer, Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)μ with large-Nc Regge models, JHEP 03 (2020) 101 [arXiv:1910.13432] [INSPIRE].
I. Danilkin, O. Deineka and M. Vanderhaeghen, Dispersive analysis of the γ*γ* → ππ process, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054008 [arXiv:1909.04158] [INSPIRE].
T. Blum et al., Connected and leading disconnected hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment with a physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 022005 [arXiv:1610.04603] [INSPIRE].
T. Blum et al., Using infinite volume, continuum QED and lattice QCD for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 034515 [arXiv:1705.01067] [INSPIRE].
N. Asmussen et al., Developments in the position-space approach to the HLbL contribution to the muon g − 2 on the lattice, PoS(LATTICE2019)195 [arXiv:1911.05573] [INSPIRE].
Sz. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon 2 magnetic moment from lattice QCD, arXiv:2002.12347.
L.-Y. Dai and M.R. Pennington, Two photon couplings of the lightest isoscalars from BELLE data, Phys. Lett. B 736 (2014) 11 [arXiv:1403.7514] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Dai and M.R. Pennington, Comprehensive amplitude analysis of γγ → π+π−, π0π0 and \( \overline{K}K \) below 1.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 036004 [arXiv:1404.7524] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Dai and M.R. Pennington, Pion polarizabilities from γγ → ππ analysis, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 116021 [arXiv:1611.04441] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Dai and M.R. Pennington, Pascalutsa-Vanderhaeghen light-by-light sum rule from photon-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 056007 [arXiv:1701.04460] [INSPIRE].
H. Terazawa, All the hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon and the lamb shift in the hydrogen atom, Prog. Theor. Phys. 39 (1968) 1326 [INSPIRE].
H. Terazawa, Spectral function of the photon propagator-mass spectrum and timelike form-factors of particles, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2159 [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to \( \alpha \left({m}_Z^2\right) \), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, \( \alpha \left({M}_Z^2\right) \), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].
A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard and M. Steinhauser, Hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment to next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 144 [arXiv:1403.6400] [INSPIRE].
V.M. Aul’chenko et al., Study of the e+e− → π+π−π0 process in the energy range 1.05–2.00 GeV, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 121 (2015) 27 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 148 (2015) 34] [INSPIRE].
BESIII collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → π+π−π0 Cross section from 0.7 GeV to 3.0 GeV via Initial-State radiation, arXiv:1912.11208 [INSPIRE].
SND collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → ηπ+π− cross section in the center-of-mass energy range 1.22–2.00 GeV with the SND detector at the VEPP-2000 collider, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 052013 [arXiv:1412.1971] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Measurement of the e+e− → ηπ+π− cross section with the SND detector at the VEPP-2000 collider, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 012008 [arXiv:1711.08862] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gribanov et al., Measurement of the e+e− → ηπ+π− cross section with the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider, JHEP 01 (2020) 112 [arXiv:1907.08002] [INSPIRE].
BESIII collaboration, Measurement of the born cross sections for e+e− → ηπ+π− at center-of-mass energies between 2.00 and 3.08 GeV, arXiv:2012.07360 [INSPIRE].
baBar collaboration, Precise measurement of the e+e− → π+π−(γ) cross section with the initial-state radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 032013 [arXiv:1205.2228] [INSPIRE].
KLOE collaboration, Measurement of σ(e+e− → π+π−γ(γ) and the dipion contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2009) 285 [arXiv:0809.3950] [INSPIRE].
KLOE collaboration, Measurement of σ(e+e− → π+π−) from threshold to 0.85 GeV2 using initial state radiation with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 102 [arXiv:1006.5313] [INSPIRE].
KLOE collaboration, Precision measurement of σ(e+e− → π+π−γ)/σ(e+e− → μ+μ−γ) and determination of the π+π− contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 720 (2013) 336 [arXiv:1212.4524] [INSPIRE].
KLOE-2 collaboration, Combination of KLOE σ(e+e− → π+π−γ(γ)) measurements and determination of \( {a}_{\mu}^{\pi^{+}{\pi}^{-}} \) in the energy range 0.10 < s < 0.95 GeV2, JHEP 03 (2018) 173 [arXiv:1711.03085] [INSPIRE].
SND collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → π+π− process cross section with the SND detector at the VEPP-2000 collider in the energy region 0.525 < \( \sqrt{s} \) < 0.883 GeV, JHEP 01 (2021) 113 [arXiv:2004.00263] [INSPIRE].
BESIII collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → π+π− cross section between 600 and 900 MeV using initial state radiation, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 629 [Erratum ibid. 812 (2021) 135982] [arXiv:1507.08188] [INSPIRE].
T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, K.K. Seth and G. Bonvicini, Precision measurement of the hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 032012 [arXiv:1712.04530] [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, Measurement of the pion form-factor in the range 1.04 GeV to 1.38 GeV with the CMD-2 detector, JETP Lett. 82 (2005) 743 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 82 (2005) 841] [hep-ex/0603021] [INSPIRE].
V.M. Aul’chenko et al., Measurement of the e+e− → π+π− cross section with the CMD-2 detector in the 370–520 MeV c.m. energy range, JETP Lett. 84 (2006) 413 [hep-ex/0610016] [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, High-statistics measurement of the pion form factor in the rho-meson energy range with the CMD-2 detector, Phys. Lett. B 648 (2007) 28 [hep-ex/0610021] [INSPIRE].
DM2 collaboration, The pion electromagnetic form-factor in the timelike energy range 1.35-{GeV} ≤ \( \sqrt{s} \) ≤ 2.4-{GeV}, Phys. Lett. B 220 (1989) 321 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Barkov et al., Electromagnetic pion form-factor in the timelike region, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 365 [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Measurements of the parameters of the ϕ(1020) resonance through studies of the processes e+e− → K+K−, KSKL, and π+π−π0, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 072002 [hep-ex/0009036] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Measurement of the e+e− → K+K− process cross-section in the energy range \( \sqrt{s} \) = 1.04–1.38 GeV with the SND detector in the experiment at VEPP-2M e+e− collider, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 072012 [arXiv:0707.2279] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Measurement of the e+e− → K+K− cross section in the energy range \( \sqrt{s} \) = 1.05–2.0 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 112006 [arXiv:1608.08757] [INSPIRE].
BESIII collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → K+K− cross section at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 2.00–3.08 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 032001 [arXiv:1811.08742] [INSPIRE].
baBar collaboration, Precision measurement of the e+e− → K+K−(γ) cross section with the initial-state radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 032013 [arXiv:1306.3600] [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, Measurement of e+e− → ϕ → K+K− cross section with the CMD-2 detector at VEPP-2M Collider, Phys. Lett. B 669 (2008) 217 [arXiv:0804.0178] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Kozyrev et al., Study of the process e+e− → K+K− in the center-of-mass energy range 1010–1060 MeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 64 [arXiv:1710.02989] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nucl. Phys. B 223 (1983) 422 [INSPIRE].
J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous ward identities, Phys. Lett. B 37 (1971) 95 [INSPIRE].
J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Quark masses, Phys. Rept. 87 (1982) 77 [INSPIRE].
E. Arganda, M.J. Herrero and J. Portoles, Lepton flavour violating semileptonic tau decays in constrained MSSM-seesaw scenarios, JHEP 06 (2008) 079 [arXiv:0803.2039] [INSPIRE].
F. Guerrero and A. Pich, Effective field theory description of the pion form-factor, Phys. Lett. B 412 (1997) 382 [hep-ph/9707347] [INSPIRE].
A. Pich and J. Portoles, The vector form-factor of the pion from unitarity and analyticity: a model independent approach, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 093005 [hep-ph/0101194] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Miranda and P. Roig, Effective-field theory analysis of the τ− → π−π0ντ decays, JHEP 11 (2018) 038 [arXiv:1806.09547] [INSPIRE].
D. Gomez Dumm, A. Pich and J. Portoles, The hadronic off-shell width of meson resonances, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 054014 [hep-ph/0003320] [INSPIRE].
A. Cordier et al., Cross-section of the reaction e+e− → π+π−π0 for center-of-mass energies from 750 MeV to 1100 MeV, Nucl. Phys. B 172 (1980) 13.
S.I. Dolinsky et al., Summary of experiments with the neutral detector at the e+e− storage ring VEPP-2M, Phys. Rept. 202 (1991) 99 [INSPIRE].
DM2 collaboration, Measurement of the e+e− → π+π−π0 and e+e− → ωπ+π− reactions in the energy interval 1350 MeV–2400 MeV, Z. Phys. C 56 (1992) 15 [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, Reanalysis of hadronic cross-section measurements at CMD-2, Phys. Lett. B 578 (2004) 285 [hep-ex/0308008] [INSPIRE].
R.R. Akhmetshin et al., Study of dynamics of ϕ → π+π−π0 decay with CMD-2 detector, Phys. Lett. B 434 (1998) 426 [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, Measurement of omega meson parameters in pi+ pi- pi0 decay mode with CMD-2, Phys. Lett. B 476 (2000) 33 [hep-ex/0002017] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Study of the process e+e− → π+π−π0 in the energy region \( \sqrt{s} \) below 0.98 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 052006 [hep-ex/0305049] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Study of the process e+e− → π+π−π0 in the energy region \( \sqrt{s} \) from 0.98 GeV to 1.38 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 032001 [hep-ex/0201040] [INSPIRE].
baBar collaboration, Study of e+e− → π+π−π0 process using initial state radiation with BaBar, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 072004 [hep-ex/0408078] [INSPIRE].
DM2 collaboration, Measurement of the reaction e+e− → ηπ+π− in the center-of-mass energy interval 1350 MeV to 2400 MeV, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 133 [INSPIRE].
CMD-2 collaboration, Study of the process e+e− → π+π−π+π−π0 with CMD-2 detector, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 125 [hep-ex/0009013] [INSPIRE].
baBar collaboration, The e+e− → 2(π+π−)π0, 2(π+π−)η, K+K−π+π−π0 and K+K−π+π−η cross sections measured with initial-State radiation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 092005 [Erratum ibid. 77 (2008) 119902] [arXiv:0708.2461] [INSPIRE].
M.N. Achasov et al., Hadronic cross section measurements at SND, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 35 (2014) 1460388 [INSPIRE].
F. James and M. Roos, Minuit: a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10 (1975) 343 [INSPIRE].
B. Moussallam, Chiral sum rules for parameters of the order six Lagrangian in the W-Z sector and application to pi0, eta, eta-prime decays, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4939 [hep-ph/9407402] [INSPIRE].
B. Moussallam, A sum rule approach to the violation of Dashen’s theorem, Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 381 [hep-ph/9701400] [INSPIRE].
M. Knecht, S. Peris, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, Decay of pseudoscalars into lepton pairs and large Nc QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 5230 [hep-ph/9908283] [INSPIRE].
J. Bijnens, E. Gamiz, E. Lipartia and J. Prades, QCD short distance constraints and hadronic approximations, JHEP 04 (2003) 055 [hep-ph/0304222] [INSPIRE].
M. Gourdin and E. De Rafael, Hadronic contributions to the muon g-factor, Nucl. Phys. B 10 (1969) 667 [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.00007] [INSPIRE].
M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 08 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1907.01556] [INSPIRE].
B. Krause, Higher order hadronic contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of leptons, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 392 [hep-ph/9607259] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2011.09618
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, W., Dai, LY. & Portolés, J. Two and three pseudoscalar production in e+e− annihilation and their contributions to (g − 2)μ. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)092
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)092