Skip to main content

Using the OEE Score to Enable Collaborative Decision-Making for Human–Machine Interaction in an Industry 5.0 Setting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of World Conference on Information Systems for Business Management (ISBM 2023)

Abstract

Industry 5.0 characterizes a paradigm shift in which the main goal is no longer the need to boost economic benefits brought about by the unending increase in production processes in automated environments, but to create intelligent environments that are more focused on the collaboration of humans and machines. The effective structure of an automated system depends drastically on Human–Machine Interaction; however, there is currently very little research on the progress of collaborative decision-making that considers how people will adapt to and accept it. The Overall Equipment Effectiveness is a Key Performance Indicator used in the manufacturing industry for the measurement, evaluation and boosting of performance effectiveness of production processes. In the context of this study, the Overall Equipment Effectiveness is used for determining and indicating when the human operator should carry out a task/action and when the machine should operate automatically during a production process in an Industry 5.0 setting. The paper initially discusses Smart manufacturing, Human–Machine Interaction, Industry 5.0 and the OEE. Secondly, the paper discusses the research methodology of a single-case experimental set-up for determining the OEE enabling collaborative decision-making. The discussion of the OEE's performance in an Industry 5.0 environment related to the case study concludes the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coetzer J, Vermaak H, Kuriakose R, Nel G (2022) The impact of collaborative decision-making in a smart manufacturing environment: case study using an automated water bottling plant. Lect Notes Netw Syst 464:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-heuser B, Wang L (2021) Industry 4. 0 and Industry 5. 0—inception, conception and perception. J Manuf Syst 61(September):530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The Welding Institute (2023) What is Industry 5.0?. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/industry-5-Industry5 (also known as robots to enhance workplace processes). Accessed 10 Jul 2023

  4. Coetzer J, Kuriakose R, Vermaak H (2020) Devising a novel means of introducing collaborative decision-making to an automated water bottling plant to study the impact of positive drift. ICT Anal Appl 154(2):661–671

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nagy J, Oláh J, Erdei E, Máté D, Popp J (2018) The role and impact of industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain-the case of Hungary. Sustain 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491

  6. Kuriakose RB, Vermaak HJ (2019) Optimization of a real time web enabled mixed model stochastic assembly line to reduce production time. Commun Comput Inf Sci 1075(1):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  7. US Department of Commerce (2023) National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.nist.gov/smart-manufacturing. Accessed 13 Jul 2023

  8. Di Nardo MD, Forino D, Murino T (2020) The evolution of man–machine interaction: the role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm. Prod Manuf Res 8(1):20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2020.1737592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang J, Liu Y (2022) Review of human-machine interaction towards industry 5.0: human-centric smart manufacturing, pp 0–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2022-89711

  10. Zuehlke D (2010) SmartFactory—towards a factory-of-things, vol 34, pp 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.008

  11. Ke Q, Liu J, Beannamoun M, An S, Sohel F (2018) Computer vision for assistive health care. In: Computer vision for human-machine interaction, pp 127–145

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akundi A, Euresti D, Luna S, Ankobiah W, Lopes A, Edinbarough I (2022) State of industry 5.0—analysis and identification of current research trends, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coronado E, Kiyokawa T, Garcia GA, Ramirez-alpizar IG, Venture G, Yamanobe N (2022) Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: a systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5. 0. J Manuf Syst 63(April):392–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Golovianko M, Terziyan V, Branytskyi V, Malyk D (2023) ScienceDirect. Proc Comput Sci 217(2022):102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Series S (2022) The 2nd advanced manufacturing student conference (AMSC22) Chemnitz, Germany, no. 2

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trout J (2022) What is overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)? ReliablePlant. https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/11785/overall-equipment-effectiveness. Accessed 22 Nov 2022

  17. Ng C, Enrique M, Korner H (2020) Applied sciences overall equipment effectiveness: systematic literature review and overview of different approaches. www.Mdpi.Com/Journal/Applsci (no. 1988)

  18. Foulloy L, Clville V, Berrah L (2019) A fuzzy temporal approach to the overall equipment effective measurement. Comput Ind Eng 127:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuriakose RB, Vermaak HJ (2020) Designing a Simulink model for a mixed model stochastic assembly line: a case study using a water bottling plant. J Discret Math Sci Cryptogr 23(2):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuriakose RB, Vermaak HJ (2019) Customized mixed model stochastic assembly line modelling using Simulink. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 2–7. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.20.S1.06

  21. Marsden E, Torgerson CJ (2012) Oxford review of education single group, pre- and post-test research designs: some methodological concerns. https://doi.org/10.2307/41702779

  22. Krasny-pacini A, Evans J (2018) ScienceDirect single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 61(3):164–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Coetzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Coetzer, J., Kuriakose, R.B., Vermaak, H.J. (2024). Using the OEE Score to Enable Collaborative Decision-Making for Human–Machine Interaction in an Industry 5.0 Setting. In: Iglesias, A., Shin, J., Patel, B., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of World Conference on Information Systems for Business Management. ISBM 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 834. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8349-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics