Keywords

1 Introduction

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) was developed by Wayne Thomas and colleagues [1] at the welding institute (TWI) in 1991 is non-fusion joining technique best suited for welding of aluminum and other light non-ferrous metals [2]. In comparison to the conventional joining techniques, FSW can create superior mechanical as well as microstructural features in the weld zone [2]. This new technique has wide application in the aerospace, automobile and shipbuilding industries [2]. The joints created by FSW have high strength which is appreciably more in comparison to the strength of the joints obtained by fusion welding technique more specifically arc welding techniques such as TIG [3] and MIG. During friction stir welding process [4] the interaction between the surface of non-consumable tool which rotates and traverses in the longitudinal direction of weld joint line, creates a weld joint using the mechanism of plastic deformation and frictional heat dissipation which results temperature lower than the melting temperature of the materials being weld [5]. It is also the further great advantage of FSW that it is possible to make joint between alloys and combinations of various materials for which the traditional welding techniques are not suitable.

The quality of welded joint, produced by the FSW, depends up on the welding parameters [6] predominantly on tool rotational speed, traverse speed and geometry of tool pin. However, there are few parameters also which may affect the quality of weld joints are thickness of the work piece, material of the workpiece and tool pin profile. In past decade lot of research have been done to identify the influence of various FSW parameters [8] on the quality of welded [7] joints in term of mechanical as well as microstructural aspects. In order to select the best pin shape, the effect of geometry of pin will be examined incorporation with other parameters. In this review, an attempt has been made to clear the idea about the influence of tool pin geometries on microstructure and mechanical properties were evaluated in term of grain size of stir zone and ultimate tensile strength [6] (UTS) of welded joint and the data have been represented in the table.

2 Experimental Study of FSW with at Least One Threaded Tool Pin Shape

Patil et al. [5] were done Friction stir welding on AA 6082-O alloy. To perform the experiment two different tool pin shapes were used to investigate the effect of the pin on the microstructural feature and mechanical behavior. Results predict that the pin geometry has dominant effect on microstructural features and the mechanical properties of the joint. It is observed that the welding joint made by taper screw thread pin produces better tensile properties in comparison to the triflute pin profile at all the rotational speeds. This means for particular value of the welding speed, joint prepared by taper screw pin has better properties. The best tensile strength of the welded joint, which was prepared by taper screw, threaded pin (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
2 images, an illustration, and a table. 2 close up images of 2 different pins. An illustration of a pin with labelings. The table has 3 columns and 2 rows that describe big diameters and small diameters of 2 different pins.

The tool pin geometry used [5]

Motalleb-nejad et al. [9] investigated the influence of pin shapes on the mechanical properties and microstructural features of AZ31B magnesium alloy friction stir welded joints. The surface of the pin profiles was utilized is shown below in the Fig. 2. The joints were made by friction stir welding at different traverse speed along the weld and rotational speeds of the tool.

Fig. 2
An illustration of 3 different pins with labels N o dot 1, N o dot 2, and N o dot 3. The pins are mounted on a cylindrical tool. The first pin is cylindrical, the second pin is threaded, and the third pin is in the shape of an inverted trapezium. Also, the bottom view of all 3 pins is given.

Pin profiles: simple cylindrical (No. 1), screw threaded cylindrical (No. 2) and taper (No.3). [9]

The results clearly predict that the joints which were fabricated by taper surfaced pin and screw threaded cylindrical pins were free from any kind of defect. It was also observed that the taper pin produces finest grain size in the stir zone microstructure thus better mechanical properties including percentage of elongation, tensile strength and hardness.

Ilangovan et al. [10] fabricated friction stir welded Joints between two separate grades of aluminum alloys. In present work two separate grades of aluminum alloys which are AA 6061 (heat treatable) and AA 5086 (non-heat treatable) attempted to join by stirring action of friction stir welding with the utilization of different tool pin geometries shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
3 illustrations depict 3 different pins. A vertical block is mounted on a horizontal block to which the pin is attached at the bottom. The first pin is cylindrical, the second pin is threaded, and the third pin is an inverted trapezium. The measurements are marked in all 3 illustrations. Also, an image depicts the same 3 pins.

Tools with different profiles of pin [10]

The microstructures of different regions of weld zone were examined and calculated by using scanning electron and optical microscopy. It was observed that the tool with threaded pin generates higher tensile strength and higher hardness in the stir zone 169 MPa and 83 HV respectively, in comparison to the other two profiles which are straight cylindrical and taper cylindrical. The improvement in the hardness value of SZ is the result of formed fine grains due to recrystallization and intermetallics in the stir/nugget zone.

Khodaverdizadeh et al. [11] investigated the influence of various tool pin profile on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded joints fabricated on pure copper. Two-tool pin profiles were utilized to fabricate the joint.

The results obtained for mechanical properties like the strength at yield point, ultimate point and hardness of parent material and welded joint using two different pin profiles are shown in Fig. 4. The examination of microstructure of joints showed that stirrer zone of joint has finer recrystallized grains of size approximately 10 µm when welding was done using tool with square pin profiles, while material welded using second tool pin profile i.e. thread cylindrical had larger grain size of around 15 µm.

Fig. 4
An image of 2 different pins. The first pin is threaded and the second pin is cylindrical.

Tools with two different pin shapes/geometries [11]

Emamian et al. [12] experimentally investigated the influence of different contours tool pins on the FSW of AA6061. AA6061 is a light weighted alloy of aluminum was used in this work as the base material. H 13 tool steel was preferred to be selected as the tool material. Friction stir welding mainly relies upon the heat being generated and flow of material done by the tool. In this attempt various tool pin contours, several speeds of rotation and different welding speeds were being selected to investigate the mechanical properties of the joint. They fabricated four different contours i.e. threaded cylindrical, stepped cylindrical, conical and square on the tool pin to perform the welding. The tool developed was provided various heat treatments prior to the operation. To evaluate the effect of speeds on the welding three different values of rotational and traverse speeds were selected. Utilizing the tools total 36 joints were fabricated. Wire cut technique machine was employed to prepare the specimens for performing the tensile test. It was carried out in UTM at 100 kN as per ASTM principles. Out of the fabricated 36 joints only 11 were found suitable for tensile test to be carried out. Graphs and bar diagrams were used to depict the variations in strength of weld. With the help of diagrams it was concluded that tool pin with threaded cylindrical contour produces maximum strength at 1600 rpm and welding speed equal to 100 mm/min (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
A table describes the percent of 8 chemical compositions and 3 mechanical properties of A A 6061 T 6 and the percent of the 8 chemical compositions of H 1 3.

Material and tool properties [12]

Zhou et al. [13] have investigated the role of pin geometries on the friction stir spot welded plates of copper (T2) and aluminum alloy (AA1060). The sheets were used in the lap joint configuration placing the aluminum sheet at the top. Experiment was conducted by using tools viz. were created of die steel (AISI H13). Pin features play an important role on material flow during welding by stirring action. Experiments were conducted to create the spot welds using four pin features namely threaded pin, featureless pin (simple cylindrical) and threaded pin with flutes. The difference in the surface areas of each pin profile produces different amount of heat during the spot welding by friction stir process hence thermal history will differ for each pin profile that will definitely have a significant influence on the microstructures as well as on the mechanical strength of joints. Threaded pin produces high amount of heat during welding thus the maximum temperature was recorded using threaded pin. They observed that there is no major difference in microhardness across the all welded samples and the maximum shear load was observed in the weld created by threaded pin tool (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
6 illustrations depict a side view and bottom view of a cylindrical pin, a threaded pin, and a threaded pin with flutes.

FSW tool pin features a cylindrical b threaded c threaded with the flutes [13]

Emamikhah et al. [14] done the microstructural and mechanical examination to explore the influence of tool pin probe shape on friction stir welded joint of (CuZn40) high-zinc brass. Experiments were conducted using different pin shapes as shown in Fig. 7. The experiments were conducted at constant rotation speeds and traverse speeds to evaluate the influence of pin geometry. Mechanical and microstructural examinations indicated that tools produce sufficient heat at the bottom surface of the tool due to friction and material stirring. It was observed that high hardness at the welding zone was obtained than the parent material due to grain refinement. Better mechanical properties were observed for the friction stir welded joint fabricated by threaded cylindrical tool.

Fig. 7
7 close-up side view images depict different pins. Also, all 7 images have an inset illustration depicting its bottom view.

Various tools: a taper with chamfer, b taper with single-thread, c flutes (03), d threaded cylinder, e taper with threads, f spline, g hexahedron [14]

Elangovan et al. [15] investigated the different welding zone for light weight structure material AA2219 macroscopically. The evaluation of the tensile properties was done to correlate the FSP zone formation. Friction Stir welding was performed using five profiles as shown in Fig. 8 at three different speed of tool rotation. It was found that among the all tool pin with different profile the tool with square pin creates stronger joint as well as metallurgically better weld joint. It was also observed that the joints fabricated by square shape pin were free from the defects.

Fig. 8
5 illustrations depict 5 pins. The structure of the pins: A cylindrical illustration is mounted on a small rectangular block to which the pin is attached at the bottom. A, a rectangle that has a cylindrical pin. B, threaded pin. C, inverted trapezium. D, a rectangle that has a square pin. E, a rectangle that has a triangle pin.

Tool pin profiles used by Elangovan et al. [15] to fabricate the joint

Izabela-Rec et al. [16] experimentally investigated the impact of different process parameters inclusive of tool rotational velocity, layout of pin and configuration of joint on the microstructural and mechanical behavior of dissimilar material joints of aluminum alloys. It is well explained in the various researches that tool rotation and the alloy placement (joint configuration) play remarkable role in the formation of weld. Greater mixing of materials was observed at high rotations and while keeping 5083 at the advancing facet and 7075 at the other side to make the joint configuration. From present study, it was also found that the Triflute pin ensures better tensile strength and joint efficiency. However, the weld joint configuration does not affect the mechanical properties of the joint. It was concluded that joint with maximum tensile strength and without defect was fabricated with the Triflute pin (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
2 images depict a triflute pin and a thread taper pin.

Tool pin profile a triflute pin b threaded taper pin [16]

Srujana et al. [17] predict that among the all tool pin profile the triangular tool produced better mechanical property as well as metallurgically good and defect free weld joints in comparison to other tool pin shapes (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
An illustration of 5 pins. The structure of the pins: A vertical rectangular block is mounted on a small vertical rectangular block to which each different pin is attached at the bottom. Also, the measurements are marked for each illustration and the bottom view for each pin is given.

Friction stir welding tool pin profiles [17]

Hattingh et al. [18] analyze the effect of tool specification on forces, on torque and temperature during friction stir welding. Here in this study tool parameter related to flute design including number of flutes, depth of flute and taper angle is taken as variable parameter. This investigation provides information about the interaction between the stirred zone and tool, which can never be observed by force magnitude information only.

Das et al. [19] observed the influence of different process variables i.e. profile of tool pin, tool shoulder diameter, penetration depth, welding traverse speed and rotation speed on the microstructural as well as mechanical behavior of welded joint. The process parameters were selected and individual influence of these variables on microstructural features and tensile strength was investigated. Out of the different selected tool pin geometries the square pin produces a sound quality weld joint which was having excellent mechanical properties due to specific stirring action by the pulsating phenomenon. It was found the tool with square profile gives best quality joint in term of mechanical and microstructural properties (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
A closeup image depicts 4 different pins.

Tools profiles used a straight cylindrical; b tapered cylindrical; c threaded cylindrical; d square [19]

Trimble et al. [20] experimentally studied the microstructure and microhardness of AA2024-T3 joints fabricated by friction stir welding. Microstructural and mechanical examination was done to observe the effect of pin geometry on the microstructural characteristics and hardness. Tapered cylinder, Triflute and Square pins were utilized in the experiments and results for each weld were reported. It was concluded from the results that the hardness in each welding zone was less than the base material and the cylindrical pin produced the joint viz. were showing some defects however the flat surface pin profiles along with flutes or without flutes produced better joints with negligible defects (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12
An illustration depicts a side view of a pin, shoulder, and tool holder. Also, there are illustrations of 3 different pins, cylindrical, triflute, and square. Also, an illustration of a shoulder type labeled scroll. The bottom view of pins and scroll are given.

The different tool pin profile used including the scroll and tool holder [20]

Krasnowski et al. [21] observed the influence of configuration of the weld joint and tool profile on the mechanical behavior of Al 6082 alloy joints fabricated by FSW. Three different types of tool probe shapes and different surfaces of shoulder were utilized for two configuration of the weld viz. one sided and two-sided. It was observed that all tools produce good quality butt joints which were free from all kind of defects or imperfections. It was also found that the joints fabricated by a Triflute tool give the better strength (Fig. 13).

Fig. 13
3 illustrations of a pin. All 3 illustrations have a tool holder, attached to the shoulder to which the pin is attached. A, threaded pin. B, triflute pin. C, cylindrical pin.

Tools utilized for FSW: a N1, b N2 and c N3 [21]

Sabari et al. [22] made a comparative study to understand the act of tool pin profiles on stir zone microstructure and the tensile properties of both FSW and UWFSW joints. Three different pin geometries as shown below in Fig. 20 were used to produce welded joints. It was observed that from this investigation, that the joint created in underwater condition (water as cooling medium) by taper threaded pin tool exhibited better tensile properties with maximum ultimate tensile strength 345 MPa (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14
An illustration depicts 4 different tool pins. The structure of the pins: A vertical cylinder is mounted on a horizontal rectangle to which each pin is attached. Pin 1: cylindrical shape, Pin 2: an inverted trapezium shaped pin. Pin 3: threaded cylindrical pin. Pin 4: threaded inverted trapezium shaped pin. Various other terms are also mentioned.

Tool pin profiles [22]

Xu et al. [23] made an attempt to evaluate the microstructure distribution of second-phase particles and mechanical properties of the joint in the direction of thickness of plate. AA219 thick plate of 12 mm was welded using two different tool pin shapes. It was found that the top surface of the joints was having larger grain size with equiaxed recrystallized microstructure and finer distribution of second-phase particles in comparison to the mid-plane surface and bottom plane surfaces. Grain size obtained was much finer and dispersion of the particles too, when the joint was fabricated by tool (a) or at the lower value of the tool rotation speed i.e. 300 rpm. It was concluded that the joint prepared by using the second tool (b) exhibited lower mechanical compared to first tool (three-spiral flute) (Fig. 15).

Fig. 15
2 part image depicts the top view of 2 different pins.

FSW tool a tool with three spiral flute b tool with threaded and tapered with triangle [23]

Tamadon et al. [24] evaluated the effect of various pin shapes of tool and operating process parameters on the material properties and grain structure of an AA1100 FSW welded plates. Three pin profiles as shown below in Fig. 16 were utilized. For each tool pin profile, welds were fabricated for a set of welding condition viz. rotational speed 710, 1120 and 1400 rpm and tool advancing speeds or welding speed along the longitudinal direction of the weld were 150, 250 and 400 mm/min. Tensile tests as well as morphology analysis were performed on the weld samples to obtain their mechanical strength and microstructural details. Morphology examination was done using optical microscopy. Evaluation of weld composition was done with the help of SEM, EDS and XRD. It was observed that there is no weld contamination formed however there were some kind of common defects which include kissing bonds, tunnel voids and swirling lines, these defects are the inherent characteristic of the stir welding and can’t be removed completely. The results obtained predict how the process parameters can be selected to produce good quality welds.

Fig. 16
3 images. A, a conical pin mounted on the shoulder. B, a square pin mounted on the shoulder. C, a threaded pin mounted on the shoulder. Each image has an illustration of the respective pins marked with measurements. Also, given are the impressions of each pin.

Tools pin shapes utilized for the AA1100 weld preparation [24]

3 Experimental Study of FSW with Non-threaded Tool Pin Shapes

Muthu Krishnan Maya Krishnan et al. [25] examine the effect of profile of pin on the mechanical behavior of the friction stir welded joint prepared on AA6063 and A319. Three pin profiles namely Square tool pin shape, round tool pin shape and Hexagonal tool pin shape were used to conduct the experiment. Plates were clamped together in butt position and friction stir welding was done on automatic CNC machine of adapted milling machine at various parameters such as welding traverse speed and rotation. Joints were checked and exhibited no defects. Results obtained from the tests clearly exhibited that the joint produced by the square tool yields superior tensile strength compared to the other tool profile. The stirrer zone of the joint has very fine grain size which results in increased microhardness (Fig. 17).

Fig. 17
3 images. A, close up images of cylindrical, hexagonal, and square pins. B, an image of a milling machine. C, a plate labeled A 319, 4090 on one side and A A 6063, 4090 on the other side.

Shapes of tool pin utilized for experiment [25]

Pankul Goel et al. [26] in this investigation, plates of Al 6063-T6 were friction stir welded at the two joint configuration butt and scarf. In general, the butt joint configuration was used for friction stir welding but they fabricated the Scarf joint and influence of pin shapes was observed on joint made in scarf configuration. The experimental investigation was done to determine the influence of probe shapes on the microstructural features, hardness, impact and tensile strength of joint. To make scarf joint a 26° inverted bevel was tested. For the characterization, scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopic analysis were utilized on the different regions of joints (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18
6 graphical illustrations depict 6 different tool pins. A, a cylindrical pin. B, a taper pin. C, a square pin. D, a triangle pin. E, a hexagonal pin.

Tool pin profiles [26]

When friction stir welded joints in butt configuration were prepared by the tool with Tapered surface showed the maximum tensile strength (162 MPa) and tool with triangular pin exhibited the minimum tensile strength (115.6 MPa). Testing was done to evaluate the impact strength of the FS welded joint in butt configuration and it was found that the joints exhibited 26 J impact strength when the welding was done with help of Tapered Cylindrical tools. New joint configuration produced low strength due to configuration.

Marzbanrad et al. [27] conducted the experiment to determine the domination of tool pin shape on mechanical properties, microstructure, flow of material, temperature history and distribution of strain of friction stir weld of AA5083 sheet. Welding was done with two different tools at 1120 rpm and 30 mm/min. Since the plunge depth of the pin was around 2.8 mm for 3 mm thick sheet. The dimensions were used to fabricate tools is shown in Fig. 19.

Fig. 19
An image depicts 2 different tool pins. Also, there is an illustration of a vertical rectangle labeled shoulder, mounted on a small rectangle labeled pin. The measurements are labeled in the illustration.

Two different tool pin geometries with the dimensions of tool pin and shoulder [27]

Fig. 20
3 micrographs depict 3 different grain structures.

Microstructural features of a nugget zone b TMAZ c HAZ [27]

For particular value of the rotational speed the area of the square pin is more than the cylindrical pin and it can also be observed from the result of the literature that the maximum temperature is more in case of the square pin in comparison to the cylindrical pin. Higher the peak temperature during welding is the favorable condition for plasticized mixing of the material and hence it will improve the quality of the joint. It can be observed that from the results the square pin shape tool generates finer grain structure in comparison to the cylindrical pin profile tool (Fig. 20).

Two welded samples which were fabricated using two pin were tested and it was observed that both the sample is having lower UTS as compared to the base material. It was also exhibited that the joint which was created using square pin has better tensile properties compared to the cylindrical pin.

Rao et al. [28] presented the influence of the tool pin profiles on pitting corrosion and microstructure of the weld nugget formed in the dissimilar joint of AA2219 aluminum-copper alloy was observed. Fabrication of weld joint was done using different geometries of tool pin as shown in Fig. 21. It was found that the plastic deformation and high temperature is experienced by the material of the stirrer zone and thus evolved microstructure which greatly affects hardness, tensile strength and corrosion characteristics of the joint. It was observed that the three things mainly affect the corrosive behavior and hardness of the nugget zone is grain size, disorientation and precipitate dissolution. It was also observed that the resistance against pitting corrosion of joints of AA2219 was observed better for hexagon shape pin profile tool in comparison to other tool pin shapes.

Fig. 21
An illustration of 5 different tool pins. Illustrations of conical, triangular, square, pentagonal, and hexagonal tool pins are present. Also, mentioned are the impressions of each tool pin along with measurements. Also, there are illustrations of weld joints of above mentioned tool pins.

Five different pin tool shapes and weld joints [28]

Ramanjaneyulu et al. [29] attempted to investigate the act of tool pin configuration in rapid plastic deformation and frictional heat generation at the time of friction stir welding of AA2014-T6. The bottom surface of shoulder portion of tool plays very important role in the frictional heat generation and observed that the tool and base material interface friction is the dominant region for frictional heating. It was concluded that from this study the hexagonal tool pin profile produces welds which have better tensile strength, lesser width of TMAZ and higher hardness at nugget zone (Fig. 22).

Fig. 22
An illustration depicts 5 tool pins, a conical pin, a triangular pin, a square pin, a pentagonal pin, and a hexagonal pin. Also, there are illustrations of the impressions of each pin with measurements.

Tool pin profiles [29]

Nadikudi et al. [30] studied the formability analysis of welded blanks. FSW was done at constant welding parameters. It has been observed that the blanks viz. were fabricated using tool with square profile showed greater formability against other tool pin geometries. It was also observed that the pulsating action created by the sharp edges of the square pin is the cause for this enhancement of mechanical property.

Jamshidi Aval et al. [31] attempted the investigation on the influence of tool pin shapes or profiles and post-welding heat treatment of weld on the microstructural and mechanical dissimilar joints which were fabricated on 8 mm thick plate of AA 6082-T6 and AA 7075-T6. The experimental analysis reveals that the tool pin profile viz. conical pin with three grooves generates higher temperatures compared to the square frustum probe tool. It was also found that more uniform mixing of material at nugget zone was performed by the tool pin with square in shape. It was also studied that the stir zone of each weld revealed with the highest kinetics of strength recovery and microhardness (Fig. 23).

Fig.23
An illustration depicts the bottom view and side view of 3 different tool pins, a small square pin, a big square pin, and a small cylindrical pin with 3 marks.

Tools with different profile of probe [31]

Thube et al. [32] studied the influence of welding process parameters and tool pin shapes on formation of weld nugget zone and tensile strength of weld on 2.5 thick plates of AA5083 aluminum alloy. Welded joints were created using different tool pin shapes at different tool rotational speed with constant tool traverse speed. Evaluation of Tensile properties of weld was done using ultimate tensile test and these properties were correlated with the formed nugget zone the weld. It was observed from this investigation that the heat generation depends on the pin shape thus on the grain size as well as on the tensile properties, and also found that weld strength was predominantly affected by heat rather plastic deformation for thin plates. It was concluded from the above analysis that cylindrical pin profiled tool creates mechanically strong welds without defects compared to other pin shapes (Fig. 24).

Fig. 24
5 illustrations of 5 different tool pins, a taper pin, a triangular pin, a cylindrical pin, a square pin, and a conical pin.

Tools pin shapes utilized for the weld preparation [32]

Palanivel et al. [33] accomplished the study on 6 mm thick plate of aluminum alloys AA5083-H111 and AA6351-T6. All the regions of joint were examined and it was observed that the tool rotational speed and pin profile play considerable role in the evolvement of microstructure and tensile properties of the joints. The joint, which was created with the help of square tool pin profile at rotational speed of 950 rpm, produces maximum tensile strength of 273 MPa (Fig. 25).

Fig. 25
An image depicts 5 different tool pins arranged in a row. The labels from the left pin are as follows: S S, S H, S O, T S, and T O.

Tools pin shapes [33]

Aghajani Derazkola et al. [34] investigated experimentally the influence of three-pin shapes, which are frustum, cubic and triangle on the friction stir welding (FSW) of poly (methyl methacrylate). It was observed that utilization of different pins effects the area of contact and hence mechanical evaluation revealed that tensile strength in longitudinal (LS) and transverse (TS) directions was 59 MPa and 43 MPa respectively of the joint was obtained by the frustum pin (Table 1 and Fig. 26).

Table 1 Summary of extracted critical data such as grain size, microhardness and tensile strength from reviewed literatures
Fig. 26
An illustration depicts 3 different tool pin shapes, a triangular pin, a square pin, and a conical pin. The measurements are marked for each pin.

Tools pin shapes utilized to fabricate the joint [34]

4 Conclusion

It is observed from the various literatures that the shape or geometry/profile of pin of a friction stir welding tool plays a major role on the microstructural features as well as mechanical properties. The reason behind this is the amount of frictional heat generation depends upon surface area of interaction between tool material and workpiece material. There exists relationship between the heat input and evolved microstructure of weld nugget zone, after the perfect recrystallization of material higher heat input will evolve the grain size and thus it was observed in some literature that for particular pin profile of tool, the rotational speed and welding speed play significant role in the final grain structure of friction stir welded joint. It is also concluded that higher the heat input results higher hardness in the nugget zone of joints.

Among the most of the literatures, it can be concluded that the shape of tool pin will also play significant role in the final grain size and thus mechanical properties of the welded joints. It is also concluded among the various pin profiles, the square shape pin creates better quality joints with high strength and microhardness in the nugget zone due to its pulsating action on material flow. Further, it is also found that square pin shape tool produces finer grain size in the region of nugget zone of weld. However, in some literatures it was also observed that threaded cylindrical pin profile tool also creates better quality joints; this may happen be due combine effect of tool rotation and welding speeds.