Abstract
The higher education has expanded dramatically during the post reform period in India. The gross attendance ratio (GAR) increased from 7.3 to 26.9% between 1995 and 2014. The most important concern vis-à-vis higher education is in terms of inequality in access, still prevalent at a worryingly high level in spite of increasing GAR among the disadvantaged groups during the recent period. The global trend suggests that higher education both in aggregate and at group levels increased only after the emergence of knowledge-based economy which resulted in massification of higher education. It is to be noted that transition of higher education from elitism to massification was accompanied with the changing role of higher education which is shifting from production of social knowledge to market knowledge. This shift is result of the changing global political economy from interventionism to laissez-faire leading to the dominance of free market forces. This paper argues that the shift in the political economic scenario resulted in private sector-led growth in India also. This led to the expansion of higher education as well as increased role of the private sector in higher education, which may adversely affect the access of the weaker section. This shift has ambivalent consequences as it is increasing the access of the weaker section in quantitative terms and reproducing inequality both in quantitative and in qualitative terms. The emerging scenario calls for increasing government role in higher education not only in terms of reducing inequality of access in quantitative terms but also in qualitative terms. The increased role of the government is indispensable in facilitating the production of social knowledge needed for social change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, D. P., Köhler, H., & Stock, M. (2004). Socialist ideology and the contraction of higher education: Institutional consequences of state manpower and education planning in the Former East Germany, 1949 to 1989. Max Planck Institute for Human Development.
Ballerini, V. (2016). Global higher education trends and national policies: Access, privatization, and internationalization in Argentina. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(1), 42–68.
Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development: Evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), 143–174.
Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Sage.
Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. Oxford University Press.
De Weert, E., (1999). Contours of the emergent knowledge society: Theoretical debate and implications for higher education research. Higher Education, 38(1), 49–69.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2000), 313–330.
Gumport, P. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39, 67–91.
Hall, P. A. (2015). How growth regimes evolve in the developed democracies. In: 22nd International Conference of Europeanists. Paris.
Iversen, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5)
Khan, K. (2015). Disparities in access to higher education in India. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies, 1(2), 168–178.
Khan, K. (2017). The impact of privatization among social and income groups. ArthaVijnana, 59(1), 34–54.
Lorenz, C. (2012). If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599–629.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics’, 22, 3–42.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.
Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge University Press.
McCowan, T. (2007). Expansion without equity: An analysis of current policy on access to higher education in Brazil. Higher Education, 53, 579–598.
Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. (1966). Investment in humans, technology diffusion and economic growth. American Economic Review, 56(2), 69–75.
OECD. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111–134.
Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9), 1325–1343.
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5, pt. II), S71–S102.
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The World-Wide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century, Working Paper, Centre on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law. Stanford Institute on International Studies, Number 32
Schugurensky, D. (2006). The political economy of higher education in the time of global markets: Whither the social responsibility of the University? In R. A. Rhoads & C. A. Torres (Ed.), The University, State, and Market: The Political Economy of Globalization in the Americas, Stanford University Press
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Contribution of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.
Thorat, S. K., & Khan, K. (2017). Private sector and equity in higher education: Challenges of growing unequal access. In N. V. Varghese, N. S. Sabhrawal, & C. M. Malish (Ed.), India higher education report 2016: Equity (pp. 92–128). SAGE Publications.
Tilak, J. B. G. (2009). Higher education: A public good or a commodity for trade? Prospects, 38, 449–466.
Triventi, M. (2013). Stratification in higher education and its relationship with social inequality: A comparative study of 11 European Countries. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 489–502. Accessed from https://academic.oup.com/esr/article-abstract/29/3/489/463114?redirectedFrom=PDF
Trow, M. (2007). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In J. J. F. Forest, P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_13
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the Transition for Elite to Mass Higher Education. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Berkeley. Accessed from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED091983.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khan, K. (2022). Political Economy of Expansion of Higher Education Implications for Unequal Access in India. In: Kale, R.K., Acharya, S.S. (eds) Mapping Identity-Induced Marginalisation in India . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3128-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3128-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3127-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3128-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)