Abstract
Access to higher education in Brazil is to a large extent restricted to the higher socio-economic groups. Public universities have limited places and entry is determined by highly competitive exams, thereby excluding those who have not had a high quality secondary education or attended an expensive preparatory course. There has been considerable growth in the private sector to absorb the excess demand, but the majority of Brazilians cannot afford the fees. This paper develops a concept of equity in higher education in which, firstly, there should be sufficient places in the system as a whole and, secondly, all people should have a fair opportunity of attending the university of their choice regardless of socio-economic background. Recent efforts to expand access are analysed, including incentives for the growth of private universities, student loans and the new Prouni initiative, in which private institutions provide free places to low-income students in return for tax exemptions. While these initiatives have the potential to increase the total number of places, they will not lead to an equitable expansion, as disadvantaged students will still be confined to courses of lower quality or with lower subsequent value on the employment market. Initiatives aimed at the public sector such as the introduction of quotas and changes to entry examinations are also discussed. Finally, some implications for future policy development are outlined.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
P. Altbach (Eds) (1999) Private Prometheus: Private Higher Education and Development in the 21st Century Greenwood Press Westport, CT
Brasil, Federal Government (2003). Bases for addressing the emergency crisis of the federal universities and schedule for the Brazilian university reform. Report of the Inter-ministerial Work Group, Brasília, DF
Brasil, Federal Government (2004a). Projeto de Lei 3582/2004. Subchefia de Assuntos Parlementares, 28 April
Brasil, Federal Government (2004b). Projeto de Lei –Sistema Especial de Reserva de Vagas. Subchefia de Assuntos Parlementares, 28 April
L.A. Cunha (1999) O público e o privado na educação superior brasileira: fronteira em movimento? H. Trindade (Eds) Universidade em Ruínas: na Repíblica dos Professores Vozes Petrópolis
N. Davies (2002) Mecanismos de financiamento: a privatização dos recursos públicos L.M.W. Neves (Eds) O Empresariamento da Educação Xamã São Paulo
H. Dundar D.R. Lewis (1999) ArticleTitleEquity, quality and efficiency effects of reform in Turkish higher education Higher Education Policy 12 343–366 Occurrence Handle10.1057/palgrave.hep.8390126
Flor, A. (2004a). Particulares tentam mudar Universidade para Todos. Folha de São Paulo, 27 May
Flor, A. (2004b). MEC estuda loteria para financiar federais. Folha de São Paulo, 8 July
Folha de São Paulo (2004a). Negro terá prioridade em financiamento. Folha de São Paulo, 18 July 2004
Folha de São Paulo (2004b). Ministério Público consegue liminar para retirar fiador do Fies. Folha de São Paulo, 3 August 2004
Folha de São Paulo (2004c). Inscrições no Fies superam em 5 vezes benefícios disponíveis. Folha de São Paulo, 20 September 2004
O. Fulton (1992) Equality and higher education B.R. Clark G. Neave (Eds) The Encyclopaedia of Higher Education: Volume 2 Analytical Perspectives Pergamon Press Oxford
R. Geiger (1986) Private sectors in higher education: structure, function and change in eight countries University of Michigan Ann Arbour
P. Gentili (2001) A universidade na penumbra: o círculo vicioso da precariedade e a privatização do espaço público P. Gentili (Eds) Universidades na Penumbra Cortez São Paulo
Globo (2004). Reforma universitária do governo prevê fim do vestibular. O Globo, 8 March 2004
T. Husén (1976) ArticleTitleProblems of securing equal access to higher education: the dilemma between equality and excellence Higher Education 5 407–422 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01680077
InstitutionalAuthorNameIBGE (2000) Censo Demográfico 2000: Educação, Resultados da Amostra IBGE Rio de Janeiro
InstitutionalAuthorNameIBGE (2003) Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicí lios 2001 IBGE Rio de Janeiro
InstitutionalAuthorNameINEP (2003) Censo da educação superior 2002 INEP Brasília
InstitutionalAuthorNameINEP (2004) Censo da educação superior 2003 INEP Brasília
J. Grand ParticleLe (1991) Equity and Choice Harper Collin London
D. Levy (1986) Higher Education and the State in Latin America: private challenges to public dominance University of Chicago Press Chicago
A. Maldonado-Maldonado (2004) Private higher education: Trends in research A. Maldonado-Maldonado Y. Cao P.G. Altbach D.C. Levy H. Zhu (Eds) Private Higher Education: An International Bibliography Center of International Higher Education and Program for Research On Private Higher Education Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts/Albany, New York 1–24
T. McCowan (2004) ArticleTitleThe growth of private higher education in Brazil: implications for equity and quality Journal of Education Policy 19 IssueID4 453–472
MEC (2004). Financiamento estudantil. Available online at http://www.mec.gov.br/Sesu/fies/, accessed on 14 December 2004
J.-G. Mora (1997) ArticleTitleEquity in Spanish higher education Higher Education 33 233–249 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1002950227350
L.M.W. Neves (Eds) (2002) O Empresariamento da Educação Xamã São Paulo
L.M.W. Neves (Eds) (2004) Reforma Universitária do Governo Lula: Reflexões para o Debate Xamã São Paulo
I.M. Ntshoe (2003) ArticleTitleThe political economy of access and equitable allocation of resources to higher education International Journal of Educational Development 23 381–398 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00070-6
G. Rhoades A. Maldonado-Maldonado I. Ordorika M. Velazquez (2004) ArticleTitleImagining Alternativas to global, corporate, new economy academic capitalism Policy Futures in Education 2 IssueID2 316–329 Occurrence Handle10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.7
D. Robertson (1997) ArticleTitleGrowth without equity? Reflections on the consequences for social cohesion of faltering progress on access to higher education Journal of Access Studies 12 9–31
Salomon, M. and Constantino, L. (2004). Filantrópica ganha R$ 839,7 mil de incentivo, Folha de São Paulo, 12 April.
A.C. Siqueira (2004) As más lições da experiência: as reformas da educação superior no Chile e na China e suas semelhanças com o caso brasileiro L.M.W. Neves (Eds) Reforma Universitária do Governo Lula: Reflexões para o Debate Sao Paulo Xama
Silveira, R.-A. (2005) Enem deixará de ser exigência para o Prouni, Folha de São Paulo, 25 January
D. Suárez (1995) O Princípio Educativo da Nova Direita P. Gentili (Eds) Pedagogia da Exclusão: Crítica ao Neoliberalismo em Educação Vozes Petrópolis
C.A. Torres D. Schugurensky (2002) ArticleTitleThe political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective Higher Education 43 IssueID4 429–445 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015292413037
H. Trindade (2003) O discurso da crise e a reforma universitária necessária da universidade brasileira M. Mollis (Eds) Las Universidades en América Latina: ¿Reformadas o Alteradas? CLACSO Buenos Aires
InstitutionalAuthorNameUNESCO (1995) Policy Paper for Change and Development in Higher Education UNESCO Paris
UNESCO (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action, adopted at the World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, October 1998.
UNESCO (2004). Statistical Tables: Education. Available online at http://www.uis.unesco.org/TEMPLATE/html/Exceltables/education/ger_tertiary.xls, accessed 14 December 2004.
World Bank (2003). GNI per capita 2003, Atlas method and PPP. Available online at http://www.worldbank.org/data/databytopic/GNIPC.pdf, accessed on 14 December 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the World Congress of Comparative Education Societies, Havana, 25th–29th October 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCowan, T. Expansion without equity: An analysis of current policy on access to higher education in Brazil. High Educ 53, 579–598 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-0097-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-0097-4