Abstract
Despite the economic importance of textile industries, the trash/waste generated by textile effluents has become a major problem since it endangers both the health of humans and the environment. The effluents of the textiles are responsible for pollution/contamination of soil, air, and water. The dyeing process is also connected with an environmental issue since washing coloured cloth and discharging the dye wastewater may release from 10 to 50% of chemicals related to dyestuff into our environment. The ineffective dyeing and other finishing processes might responsible for the discharge of wasted dyestuff (200,000 tonnes) into our environment globally. Such dye pollutants have serious health complications for living species. Moreover, colouring agents and microplastics along with their types and harmful effects are taken into consideration in the present study. We reviewed (1) introduction to textile and its importance; (2) processes in the textile sector responsible for environmental pollution especially dyeing processes; (3) environmental pollution, i.e., air, soil, and water and dye pollution; (4) colouring agents and types; and (5) microplastics, its types, and environmental pollution especially human health risks. Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), SO2, CO2, and NO2 are the air pollutants are also discussed and their health implications are given in this chapter. Similarly, zinc (Zn), mercury (Hg), sulphide, sulphates, phosphates, copper (Cu), and nickel (Ni) are major water pollutants due to textiles, which bear negative impacts on environment and human health.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Being the oldest industry, the roots of the textile industry trace back to scraps found in a cave of Egypt at about 5000 B.C. [110]. The textile industry is comprised of making yarns and threads from either natural or synthetic fibres through the process of weaving and knitting, resulting in fabrics. The final step is the dyeing and finishing of yarn or threads and sometimes the fabrics are dyed [40]. The textile sector includes different characteristics which determine the textile sectors’ sub-division into subsectors due to traits, length of the manufacturing process, and variety of technical process, such sector can also be divided into several ways, which depends on the production process and final products achievement [122]. Hence, the textile industry is subdivided into many fragments depending on various traits of the subsectors.
The textile industry is a key driver of the economy for every country, which not only fulfils the needs of individuals but also raises the quality and standard of living along with unemployment reduction [46]. Being the second-largest cloth exporter after China, Bangladesh not only makes 80% of total annual export, i.e., $24 billion, but also contributes to 45% of industrial employment and 5% to the total national income. Also, Indian textile sector studies revealed the contributing role of the textile sector by providing 14% of total industrial production, 3% of GDP, and a source of employment while providing jobs to more than 35 million individuals [37]. In Pakistan, textile accounts for 60% income of expert income, a source of employment for 38% of the total labour force, and fourth-largest exporter of cotton [154]. So, no industry can compete with textile to bring foreign reserves and generate employment for individuals.
China leads the world in exporting textiles to other countries globally. Therefore, China was considered in the top list of textile exporters in 2016 with a net value of 106 billion US dollars. The 28 countries of the European Union were ranked second after China with a net value of 65 billion USD, while other countries like Turkey, India, and USA were ensuing with net values of 11, 16, and 13 billion USD [150]. In 2016, China and 28 countries of the EU were considered among the top two exporters of cloth followed by other countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam, India, Hong Kong, and Turkey. In 2016, the values of textile exports and apparel exports were 284 billion USD and 443 billion USD demonstrated by the World Trade Statistical Review (Table 1).
2 Textile Industry Processes
2.1 Yarn Manufacturing
The manufacturing processes in the textile sector include yarn preparation, which is obtained from natural plants and animals. The mechanical processes are involved in yarn preparation like fibre blae opening, blending, mixing, clearing, drawing, roving, and finally spinning [66]. Further detailed processes of such production are described via material processing and technical control. The important and useful topics in the textile are staple-yarn technology, rolling-drafting, ring spinning, advancements in fibre production technologies, air open-end rotor spinning, and jet spinning [90]. The yarn-producing technology is considered as an important study in the preparation of yarn containing different processes [92].
2.2 Fabric Manufacturing
Three different techniques like weaving, non-weaving, and knitting are used to produce fabrics via fibre/yarn interlacing. The plain and simple weaves, such as tabby or plain, and satin and the fancy weaves, such as pile, jacquard, dobby, and gauze, are the most common forms of woven fabric manufactured [162]. The second most common form of cloth is knitted fabric, which is used after woven fabric. Knitted fabric has different properties like fitting the body shape and allowing for ease of movement, which remain an especially pleasant sports fabric structure, leisure wear, and undergarments. Woven textiles include warp and weft kinds, as well as raschel and tricot [162].
Interlaced fabric designs such as net, lace, and braid are also valuable. Non-woven fabric usage is continuously increasing in the market. The interlaced-fabrics textiles are finding intriguing applications in industrial and residential settings. Non-woven textiles include felting and bonding compounds. Laminating methods are also becoming more important, and new progress involves needle weaving and sewing-knitting [162].
An ecological approach to make fabrics from raw bottles is also an environment-friendly process [124]. Fabric producers are encouraged by the ease and low cost of producing recycled polyester yarn. Chopped and grounded plastic bottles into little bits that soften and melt as they pass through a series of tiny holes, resulting in thin strands. The thin strands produced are then currently used in the woven and knit industries to make fabric [124]. Strong recommendations should be made in order to use environment-friendly processes to mitigate the textile wastes.
2.3 Product Planning
Production planning is a difficult aspect of any industrial business. Textile planning is complex due to the variety of fibres, counts, yam, spinning systems, processes of preparation, and final products. All of these issues, when paired with the customer's needs for accurately completed orders and quick delivery dates, hinder the production planning process. Furthermore, since severe international rivalry has influenced the market, competent planning for production in the textile sector has become increasingly important [121].
The fibres are removed from other components such as capsule fragments, leaves, twigs, and soil and also from the seeds in the first phase of the methods outlined in a set of spinning drums and moving carding bars fitted with metal combing teeth comb the fibres in a carding machine. Consequently, the product formed is a soft homogenous fibre band. The silver has been holding between the parallel fibres as a result of friction among parallel fibres, which in turn provides rigidity in further manufacturing processes. Basically, the spinning process is responsible for transforming a loose fibre bundle into a real yarn. The twisting of the pack of similar fibres provides the yarn its toughness. The most widely used spun techniques in the industry are open-end spinning, ring spinning, and air jet spinning [105].
Knitting, the most popular way of interloping and producing textile goods, necessitates a reasonably fine, smooth, and robust yarn with high elastic recovery characteristics. The outdone system has been shown to be particularly appropriate for spinning yarns used for knitted garments, socks, and outerwear, while the combed cotton system has proven to be highly appropriate for spinning yarns used for undergarments, sports, and socks. The production of innovative fibres and texturing methods have been especially advantageous to the knitting business, resulting in a tight relationship between the two sectors [105]. Weft and warp techniques are used to synthesise yarns in knitting processes. The distinction between weft and warp knitting stems from the movement of the needles during manufacturing and how the yarn is supplied. Weft knitting is a one-fibre method, which implies that the stitches are constructed using only one fibre. The needles are manipulated independently, whereas the warp knitting needles are moved concurrently. As a result, all needles require the fibre material simultaneously [149].
Braiding is a fabric-making technique that takes at least three yarns. The braid is produced by alternately interweaving the strands according to a certain algorithm. Braids are “real or large bodies with a regular thread density and a closed product surface, whose braid bobbin yarns are intertwined slantwise towards the product edge”. A woven fabric, on the other hand, has threads that are interwoven perpendicular to the product edge and can have a biaxial or triaxial structure [42].
Lastly, finishing is a modification that is applied to a cloth to alter its look, handling—touch, or durability. The intention of finishing is that the fabric will be more appropriate for its intended use and involves any common treatment given to clean and iron fabrics. Finishing also creates exclusive variations of fabrics by using chemical treatments, dyeing, printing, and other techniques to make the fabric attractive and appealing. Finishing is divided into two processes: chemical and mechanical. Chemical finishing refers to treatments that modify the performance of a textile fabric and in which the chemical is the primary component of the change. Mechanical finishing refers to mechanical devices that physically change the cloth. The finish processes assist to improve the appearance and look of the fabric; provide diversity in fabrics through dyeing and printing; improve the fabric texture; make the fabric more usable; increase the draping ability of lightweight fabrics; and make the fabric appropriate for an end purpose [105].
2.4 Processes Responsible for Environmental Pollution Especially for Dyes
The pollution generated by textile effluents has become a major problem since it endangers both human health and the environment [132]. The dyeing process is connected with an environmental issue since washing coloured cloth and discharging dye wastewater may release 10–50% of different chemicals related to dyestuff into the environment. The inefficient dyeing and finishing process might result in the discharge of 200,000 tonnes of wasted dyestuff into the environment globally [28].
Textiles are offered varied functions through the finishing procedures. Formaldehyde is widely used as a glueing agent, softener, and cross-linking resin. Because of the release of formaldehyde, such textile goods can cause eye irritation, skin itching, and allergies [82]. Perfluoroalkyl chains with eight or more fluorinated carbons are utilised to provide resistance to oil stain and also water repellence in textile products [138]. Perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluoro octane sulphonate form a long chain, which degrades and produces harmful impacts for all living species [76]. Many finishing compounds used to provide flame retardancy, like polybrominated diphenyl ethers, have been proven to be extremely hazardous to people [134].
Water is used at each stage like wet finishing, transferring chemicals to textiles, and washing materials before going on to the next phase. Aside from these textile operations, water is consumed during boiler, cooling water, steam drying, and cleaning [165]. A medium-sized textile industry manufacturing roughly 8000 kg of cloth per day spends around 1.6 million litres on water. One-fifth of this amount is spent on dying, while the other half is spent on printing. Depending on the colour used in the dyeing, 30–50 l of water are consumed per kilogramme of cloth. Approximately 60 l of water are used per kilogramme of yarn during the dyeing process. The wastewater produced during the dyeing process accounts for approximately one-fifth of the total effluent. Water is also necessary to attain the requisite fastness values and to clean the equipment. The quantity of water used to make fabric for a couch cover is around 500 gallons [73]. Approximately two hundred thousand kilos of water are polluted during traditional dyeing and finishing procedures of 1000 kg of cloth, and a large amount of steam and hot water is required for energy during these phases [153]. A cotton shirt requires around 2500–3000 l of water to manufacture [56].
3 Environmental Pollution and Textile Industries
Many environmental issues are raised by textile waste [17]. Numerous studies were carried out to identify the environmental consequences of the business and mitigate its harmful effects.
3.1 Water Pollution
The textile business is global in scope, generating over $1 trillion in revenue, accounting for 7% of entire global exports, and employing approximately 35 million people worldwide [36]. Despite unquestionable significance, the industrial sector is one of the most polluting in the world, using large amounts of chemicals and fuels [14]. The massive consumption of drinking water is in different activities of its production chain, including washing, bleaching, and dyeing [65]. The ineffective dyeing and finishing processes might result in the discharge of 200,000 tonnes of wasted dyestuff into the environment globally [28]. 1.6 million litres of water are consumed to produce 8000 kg of clothes in a medium-sized textile mill. About 30–50 l of water are in each kilogramme of cloth production [73].
The textile sector is responsible for a wide range of environmental effects [108]. Particulate matter and dust, oxides of nitrogen and sulphur, and volatile organic compounds are among the pollutants released into the atmosphere. The major solid waste consists of fragments of textile fabrics and yarns, as well as wasted packaging. The textile sludge, on the other hand, exposes issues linked to excess quantities and undesirable composition, frequently exhibiting large loads of organic matter, micronutrients, heavy metal cations, and pathogenic microorganisms [14].
3.2 Soil Pollution
The effluent from the textile industry pollutes the land. The topsoil is the most significant medium for growing plants, shrubs, and crops, among other things. The quality of crops is determined by the condition of the soil. As a result, as the quality of the soil deteriorates due to contaminated industrial effluent, so do the quantity and quality of crops. It has also been observed that the lower areas are becoming more contaminated than the upper regions. Such contamination is attributed due to the position of the lower ground [72]. The solid wastes dispose into the underground water through porous soils and also contaminate land [155, 81].
3.3 Textile Aerial Pollution
Carbon dioxide, aerosol fumes and gases, toxic gases, smoke, and dust are all examples of air pollutants. The majority of textile mill processes emit pollutants into the atmosphere. Gaseous emissions have been recognised as the textile industry’s second most serious pollution concern [72]. The primary source of air pollution in the textile sector is during the finishing phases when various procedures are used to coat the textiles. Lubricating oils, plasticisers, paints, and water repellent chemicals are examples of coating materials. Organic substances such as oils, waxes, or solvents, acid vapour, odours, and boiler exhausts are examples of coating materials [96]. Cleaning and production modifications produce sludge in the tanks containing process chemicals, which may contain hazardous compounds and metals [104].
3.4 Dye Pollution
Dyes are solvable organic chemicals, particularly those categorised as reactive, direct, basic, and acidic [95]. Dyes have a very high dissolution property in water, making it difficult to remove them using traditional techniques [59]. The capacity of dyes to transmit colour to a particular substrate is one of its characteristics due to the occurrence of chronographic groups in molecular structure [137]. Nevertheless, the ability to fix colour to the material is associated with auxotrophic groups, which are polar in nature and may bind to polar groups of textile fibres [174].
Textile dyes’ colour may not only contribute to aesthetic harm to the aquatic environment [135], but also hinders light permeation through water [59], resulting in a drop-in photosynthesis rate [71] and (DO) dissolved oxygen levels, impacting the whole aquatic biota [59]. Textile dyes are also toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic agents [84]. The dyes act as important environmental pollutants as shown in Table 2 and transverse whole food chains, giving biomagnification [131], which in turn makes the prey more contaminated as compared to organisms at a higher level [111]. So, the azo-dyes due to their non-binding capacity to clothes contaminate water, which requires attention because such contaminated water is then used for irrigation and other purposes in poor countries [127]. Lastly, the microbes in the soil and germination and growth of plants are greatly influenced by the utilisation of azo chemicals [71, 127].
4 Health Risks
4.1 Air Pollution and Health Risks
The majority of operations in the wet processing industry emit air pollution shown in Table 3. Gaseous air has been recognised as the second most significant pollution concern for the dyeing and printing sectors. Air pollution is caused by the release of several gases such as Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Carbon dioxide (CO2), Sulphur dioxide (SO2), and others [163]. SO2 is the causing agent of irritation in the respiratory system and bronchitis, while CO2 inhibits oxygen into body cells causing unconsciousness [102]. The production of artificial fibres is the result of greenhouse gases emissions because of the energy requirement [12].
The amount of greenhouse gases was 2.69–8.6 kg CO2 eq/kg fibre [164]. Higher results were stated, i.e., 35.7-kg CO2 eq/kg fibre. It is estimated that the cytotoxic capability of acrylic fibre production is linked to the emission of As, Cd, zinc (Zn), and Cr into both air and water [12]. One kilogramme of acrylic fibre produces approximately 0.013-kg SO2 equivalent. For every kilogramme of acrylic fibre produced, 0.007 kg of NO2 is discharged into the closest disposal canal via effluent discharge. The carcinogenic risk of acrylic fibre is owing to the emission of As, Cd, Zn, and Cr into both air and water during the production process [179].
4.2 Land Pollution and Health Risks
The effluent from the textile industry contaminates the land. The soil is the most significant medium for growing plants, shrubs, and crops, among other things. The quality of crops is determined by the condition of the soil. As a result, as the quality of the soil deteriorates by contaminated industrial effluent, so do the quantity and quality of crops. It has also been observed that the lower areas are becoming more contaminated than the upper regions [72]. In landfills, the solid waste decomposes to create methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas. This ameliorates climate change by causing the ozone layer to deplete. The ecosystem suffers as a result of inappropriate disposal of biodegradable garbage, often known as unlawful dumping. Leaching is the process by which solid waste enters the pores in the soil and pollutes groundwater, thereby contaminating the land [148, 155].
Textile industry sewage mostly comprises alkali, residual colours, starches, soluble salts, cellulose primarily calcium and sodium, silicate, oil, and other pollutants. Due to a lack of economically feasible treatment methods, the industrial effluent created by these rapidly growing textile and dying plants is typically dumped untreated onto the ground surface. Consequently, such processes result in contamination of soil level along with groundwater and the possibility of pollution of other biophysical resources along the discharged region. It has been demonstrated that textile industry wastewater has a direct influence on the physicochemical characteristics of soil [98].
4.3 Water Pollution and Health Risks
Textiles consume and pollute water more and ranked 2nd after agriculture portrayed in Table 4 [112]. Direct effluents from textiles into water bodies are the main source of water pollution [14]. Such discharge of effluents is 80% of total wastes produced by the textile industries [172]. In making a single cotton shirt, it is estimated that 2500–3000 l of water is used [151]. A case study was conducted to better understand how a conventional finishing factory operates and what may be accomplished via modernisation [156]. Without paying attention to the toxics in effluents, the waste from the textile is disposed into the water. Such wastewater contains high (BOD) Biological Oxygen Demand, (COD) Chemical Oxygen Demand, high (SS) total suspended solids, grease and oil, sulphides, sulphates, phosphates, Cr, copper (Co), and/or the salts of other heavy metals [160].
Improper or apparently processed wastewaters contain varying levels of heavy metals such as As, lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), Cd, Co, Mercury (Hg), Zn, and Cr, which have the potential to harm crops grown under such irrigation condition [139, 143]. The contamination of heavy metals is a growing issue in our seas, lakes, and rivers. Heavy metal deposition in fish, oysters, sediments, and other aquatic ecosystem components has been observed globally [144]. These hazardous heavy metals that enter the aquatic environment are adsorbed on top of particulate matter, despite the fact that they can form free metal ions and soluble complexes that are readily available [144].
4.4 Dye Pollution
Dyes are present in varying concentrations in effluents when released containing numerous processes. The dye content in the discharged wastewater ranges from 20 to 200 ppm [54]. The aquatic life is largely influenced by the release of toxics into water producing mutagenic and carcinogenic effects [30]. The 4-aminobiphenyl induces chromosomal instability and damage to DNA along with other serious complications [25, 93]. Similarly, gastrointestinal issues are caused by sunset yellow dye, while quinoline yellow dye, which is used in the pharmaceutical sector, can induce itching, sneezing, and hyperactivity in youngsters when consumed [31]. Headache, vomiting, ulcer, nausea, and other cardiac complications are attributed to exposure to methylene blue dyes [83]. Hence, dyes can alter the rate of photosynthetic activity in phytoplankton, which in turn is responsible for global warming [78].
Dye concentrations in textile effluent have been recorded in a variety of ranges. The ranges include the dye level in textile effluent is 10–50 mg/l [89]. The reactive dyes in cotton mills are allegedly discharged in concentrations of 60 mg/l [140] and 100–200 mg/l [55]. An extremely high concentration of reactive dyes has been reported, i.e., 7000 mg/l [86]. About 20–50 mg/l of dye concentration has been reported in samples collected from 14 Ramadhan Textiles in Iraq [2]. Moreover, the dye Acid orange-10 concentration was 45 mg/l [146], while 10–250 mg/l of dye concentration was found in disposals from houses [53].
4.5 Dye Classification and Health Effects
Dyes, metals, and other toxins are mixed with the effluents emitted by textile producers. Natural and synthetic dyes are the two types of colourants. Synthetic dyes are cheaply manufactured, come in a variety of colours, and are distinguished by their fastness, making them more commonly utilised as compared to natural dyes [85]. Synthetic dyes are categorised into various groups according to their chemical structure, i.e., azo, sulphur anthraquinone, phthalocyanine, and triarylmethane, and according to their mode of application, i.e., reactive, direct, disperse, basic, and vat dying [120]. The production of dyes is approximately 70 million tonnes, and 10 thousand dyes are used in textile processes throughout the world [22].
Different toxics are present in the textile effluents containing a high load of salts, alkalis, binders, dispersants, volatile organic compounds, surfactants, chlorobenzenes, reducing agents, dioxin, phthalates, phenols, pentachlorophenol, detergents, and heavy metals [63, 68, 180]. The yearly disposal of about 0.4–0.5 million tonnes containing dyes and compounds flow into water bodies, creating pollution, health issues shown in Table 5, and other environmental difficulties [15].
Natural dyes like Indigoid dyes, Anthraquinone dyes, Naphthoquinone dyes, Benzoquinone dyes, Flavonoid dyes, Carotenoid dyes, and Tannin-based dyes are the classified on the basis of chemical structures of dyes [133]. Natural dyes are extracted from plants, animals, minerals, and microorganisms [93]. Some of the examples include blue colour dye obtained from indigo plants, red colour dye from madder and morinda, and yellow from various plants like turmeric barberry and marigold. Dyes obtained from animals include red colour dye from insects and Tyrian purple obtained from sea molluscs [133]. The textile standard has suggested that synthetic dyes be used within acceptable limits and that natural resources not be depleted for dye extraction. So, because the extraction of natural dyes utilising natural resources is not a sustainable choice when the entire globe is suffering the detrimental effects of climate change, synthetic dyes are favoured over natural colours [26, 108].
4.6 Colouring Agents
Textile colourants give colour to a textile item as a result of physical entrapment or chemical binding inside or around the textile substance, generally with a high degree of permanence. The textile material can take various forms, including fibre, yarn, fabric, garment, and so on. Textile colourants are available in liquid and solid forms, such as powders, granules, solutions, and dispersions. In some cases, precursors are applied to textile materials in order to create the colourant in situ within the cloth [159]. To colour textile items, both dyes and pigments are used [182]. Dyes are present in solution either at any stage during its application, while pigments are insoluble. The process by which dyes stay within a cloth is determined by the type of colourant used. Intermolecular forces work between dye and fibre following adsorption onto and/or dissolution inside the polymer. The formation of covalent bonds between the dye and the fibre and entrapment of colourant particles within the textile by deposition of an insoluble form of the dye may all contribute to retention [182].
4.6.1 Types of Colouring Agents
4.6.1.1 Natural Colourants
All textile colourants were derived directly from natural sources, such as insects, plants, and shellfish before the production of picric acid as a yellow dye for silk [34, 182]. In the 1920s, natural colourants were gradually supplanted by synthetic dyes and pigments, which provided a broader and brighter colour range as well as better economy and convenience. While, a recent surge in interest in natural textile colourants due to notions of renewable supply and minimal environmental effect due to non-suitability for industrial usage, have a restricted colour range, and exhibit only modest degrees of fastness at best. Furthermore, natural dyes sometimes need the application of a fixative, known as a mordant, to achieve adequate permanence; conventional metallic mordants are harmful to the environment. Textile colours derived from natural sources, such as Indigo, may now be produced more effectively by chemical synthesis [69].
4.6.1.2 Synthetic Colourants
A large proportion of textile colourants are chemically synthesised on an industrial scale [61]. Every year, about a million tonnes are generated globally. Since the first commercially effective synthetic textile dye, Mauveine, was produced in the late 1850s, tens of thousands of colourants have been sold [8, 182]. A more methodical approach to textile colourant research, however, spearheaded mostly by the German dye industry, resulted in a greater knowledge of both colour and chemistry structure connections. At the turn of the century, Germany produced 85% of the world's synthetic dyes, with the remaining 10% produced in the United Kingdom, France, and Switzerland. After some decades, manufacturing is centred in Asia, notably China and India, due to lower cost bases. Textile colourants have a multibillion-dollar global market [9]. The clothing sector consumes the most dyes and organic pigments. Some of the most popular textile dyes are quite commodities, produced in large quantities of over 1000 tonnes per year for delivery at a few dollars per kilogramme or even less.
5 Other Aspects of Textile Industries
5.1 Microplastics
Microplastic is the form of a plastic polymer having a particle size of less than 5 mm [6]. Microplastic can be derived from either primary or secondary sources. Also, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is more specific in its proposed definition:
“‘Microplastic’ means particles containing solid polymer, to which additives or other substances may have been added, and where ≥1% w/w of particles have:
-
(i)
all dimensions 0.1 µm ≤ x ≤ 5 mm, or
-
(ii)
for fibres, a length of 0.3 µm ≤ x ≤ 15 mm and length to diameter ratio of >3” [32].
Since their origin, primary microplastics have a micrometre size, such as microplastic fibre generated from fabric washing [109] and cosmetic goods (facial cleanser) labelled as “microbeads” or “microexfoliates” [47]. Secondary microplastics are formed as a result of physiochemical and biochemical mechanisms in the environment that degrade bigger plastic trash [19].
5.1.1 Production of Microplastics from Textile Industries
Many research on the release of microplastics from textiles have concentrated on home washing as a source of fibres entering waterways. Shedding is affected by the qualities of the textile item, such as fibre material, yarn size, fabric structure, fabric weight, and fabric finishing [21]. Polyester fleece, for instance, has been shown in several tests to have greater fibre counts, i.e., >7000 fibres/m−2/l−1 as compared to other forms of polyester textiles [5]. Variability in washing equipment and settings, as well as detergents, can also affect the number of fibres released from a garment or item, with both dryers and washers causing textile fibre shedding. Several researchers have discovered that tumble drying increases fibre release by 3.5 times as compared to washing polyester fleece items [116]. Further possible sources of textile-derived microplastics in the environment include ropes and netting fragmentation and the breakdown of carelessly disposed non-woven hygiene items [21].
5.1.2 Process of Microplastic Formation
The rising global manufacturing of synthetic fibres poses a threat that microplastics produced by synthetic textiles will continue to pollute our ecosystem in near future [60]. Fibres are frequently identified as the major ingredient of microplastics discovered in wastewater treatment facilities [80, 106], as well as in a wide range of environmental samples [35, 50]. According to a recent modelling research, fibres from textiles substantially contribute to microplastic emissions into freshwater [79]. As a result, these microplastics are released into the environment, which in turn are present in effluents or trapped by the sludge.
Several inferences about the release processes, however, may still be drawn. Because the washing studies looked at different textiles using different experimental setups and analytical methods, the amount of microplastics released per wash reported varied, ranging from 0.012 mg/g [116] to 3.3 mg/g [142] and from 23 MPF/g [116] to 1273 MPF/g [44]. It is estimated that the release of microplastics from textiles is heavily influenced by the types of textiles and their treatment procedures [20]. Hence, materials utilised in several research ranged from complete garments [18, 58] to textile pieces [44], to double folded and stitched edges [62], and to scissor-cut edges (Table 6).
6 Conclusion
This study focused on the wastes generated by textile industries and their negative influences on humans and the environment. Dyeing may be either natural or artificial, which has serious environmental health issues. About, 200,000 dyes are disposed into our environment every year. Also, colourants are either primary or secondary and have negative effects on the environment in the form of health complications to humans. Different types of microplastics can also have serious effects on the environment and humans.
References
Abdullah NA, Othaman R, Abdullah I, Nazwa J, Baharum A (2012) Studies on the adsorption of phenol red dye using silica-filled ENR/PVC beads. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci 3(5):845–850. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC131545
Abid MF, Zablouk MA, Abid-Alameer AM (2012) Experimental study of dye removal from industrial wastewater by membrane technologies of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Iran J Env Health Sci Eng 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-9-17
Afkhami A, Saber-Tehrani M, Bagheri H (2010) Modified maghemite nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for removing some cationic dyes from aqueous solution. Desalination 263(1–3):240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.065
Ahmed MK, Shaheen N, Islam MS, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M, Islam S, Islam MM, Kundu GK, Bhattacharjee L (2016) A comprehensive assessment of arsenic in commonly consumed foodstuffs to evaluate the potential health risk in Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 544:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.133
Almroth BMC, Åström L, Roslund S, Petersson H, Johansson M, Persson N-K (2018) Quantifying shedding of synthetic fibers from textiles; a source of microplastics released into the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(2):1191–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0528-7
Arthur C, Baker JE, Bamford HA (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects, and fate of microplastic Marine Debris. University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA, USA, 9–11 Sept 2008
Atkinson RW, Butland BK, Anderson HR, Maynard RL (2018) Long-term concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Epidemiology (Cambridge, MA) 29(4):460. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000847
Baldwinson T, Shore J (1990) In: Shore J (ed) Colorants and auxiliaries, vol 2, pp 338–339
Bamfield P (2010) Chromic phenomena: technological applications of colour chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry
Banaee M, Soltanian S, Sureda A, Gholamhosseini A, Haghi BN, Akhlaghi M, Derikvandy A (2019) Evaluation of single and combined effects of cadmium and micro-plastic particles on biochemical and immunological parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Chemosphere 236:124335
Belay K, Abisa Z (2015) Developing a method for trace metal analysis in spices using spectroscopic techniques: a review. Int J Chem Nat Sci 3:195–199
Beton A, Dias D, Farrant L, Gibon T, Le Guern Y, Desaxce M, Kougoulis J et al (2014) Environmental improvement potential of textiles (IMPRO-textiles). European Commission
Bharagava RN, Mani S, Mulla SI, Saratale GD (2018) Degradation and decolourization potential of an ligninolytic enzyme producing Aeromonas hydrophila for crystal violet dye and its phytotoxicity evaluation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.012
Bhatia S, Devraj S (2017) Pollution control in textile industry. WPI Publishing
Bhavsar S, Dudhagara P, Tank S (2018) R software package based statistical optimization of process components to simultaneously enhance the bacterial growth, laccase production and textile dye decolorization with cytotoxicity study. PloS One 13(5):e0195795
Brenneman KA, Meleason DF, Sar M, Marshall MW, James RA, Gross EA, Martin JT, Dorman DC (2002) Olfactory mucosal necrosis in male CD rats following acute inhalation exposure to hydrogen sulfide: reversibility and the possible role of regional metabolism. Toxicol Pathol 30(2):200–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/019262302753559533
Briga-Sa A, Nascimento D, Teixeira N, Pinto J, Caldeira F, Varum H, Paiva A (2013) Textile waste as an alternative thermal insulation building material solution. Constr Build Mater 38:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.037
Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, Thompson R (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45(21):9175–9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s
Browne MA, Niven SJ, Galloway TS, Rowland SJ, Thompson RC (2013) Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr Biol 23(23):2388–2392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.012
Cai Y, Mitrano DM, Heuberger M, Hufenus R, Nowack B (2020) The origin of microplastic fiber in polyester textiles: the textile production process matters. J Clean Prod 267:121970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121970
Cesa FS, Turra A, Baruque-Ramos J (2017) Synthetic fibers as microplastics in the marine environment: a review from textile perspective with a focus on domestic washings. Sci Total Environ 598:1116–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.172
Chandanshive V, Kadam S, Rane N, Jeon B-H, Jadhav J, Govindwar S (2020) In situ textile wastewater treatment in high rate transpiration system furrows planted with aquatic macrophytes and floating phytobeds. Chemosphere 252:126513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126513
Chasapis CT, Spyroulias GA (2009) RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligases: structure and drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 15(31):3716–3731. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161209789271825
Chen C-H, Chang C-F, Liu S-M (2010) Partial degradation mechanisms of malachite green and methyl violet B by Shewanella decolorationis NTOU1 under anaerobic conditions. J Hazard Mater 177(1–3):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.030
Chen K-C, Wu J-Y, Liou D-J, Hwang S-CJ (2003) Decolorization of the textile dyes by newly isolated bacterial strains. J Biotechnol 101(1):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00303-6
Chengalroyen M, Dabbs E (2013) The microbial degradation of azo dyes: minireview. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29(3):389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1198-8
Chequer FMD, Lizier TM, de Felício R, Zanoni MVB, Debonsi HM, Lopes NP, Marcos R, de Oliveira DP (2011) Analyses of the genotoxic and mutagenic potential of the products formed after the biotransformation of the azo dye Disperse Red 1. Toxicol In Vitro 25(8):2054–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2011.05.033
Chequer FD, De Oliveira GR, Ferraz EA, Cardoso JC, Zanoni MB, de Oliveira DP (2013) Textile dyes: dyeing process and environmental impact. In: Eco-friendly textile dyeing and finishing, vol 6(6), pp 151–176
Chou C (2003) Hydrogen sulfide: human health aspects. World Health Organization
Chowdhury S, Saha P (2010) Sea shell powder as a new adsorbent to remove Basic Green 4 (Malachite Green) from aqueous solutions: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J 164(1):168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.050
Chung K-T (2016) Azo dyes and human health: a review. J Environ Sci Health C 34(4):233–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2016.1236602
Committee for Risk Assessment and Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (2020) Opinion on an Annex XV dossier proposing restrictions on intentionally-added microplastics. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/5a730193-cb17-2972-b595-93084c4f39c8. Accessed on 30 July 2020
Dauda MY, Erkurt EA (2020) Investigation of reactive Blue 19 biodegradation and byproducts toxicity assessment using crude laccase extract from Trametes versicolor. J Hazard Mater 393:121555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121555
De Graaff JH (2004) The colourful past. Origins, chemistry and identification of natural dyestuffs, pp 234–235
Desforges J-PW, Galbraith M, Dangerfield N, Ross PS (2014) Widespread distribution of microplastics in subsurface seawater in the NE Pacific Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 79(1–2):94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.035
Desore A, Narula SA (2018) An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry. Environ Dev Sustain 20(4):1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9949-1
Dharmaraj A, Sivakumar S (2013) Direct and indirect effects of independents variables on return on the total assets of composite cotton sector—an analytical study in Indian textile companies. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 3(1):24–26
Dong CD, Chen CW, Chen YC, Chen HH, Lee JS, Lin CH (2020) Polystyrene microplastic particles: In vitro pulmonary toxicity assessment. J Hazard Materi 385:121575
Dorman DC, Struve MF, Gross EA, Brenneman KA (2004) Respiratory tract toxicity of inhaled hydrogen sulfide in Fischer-344 rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, and B6C3F1 mice following subchronic (90-day) exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.03.010
EPA E (1997) Office of compliance sector notebook project: profile of the textile industry. EPA310R97009, Washington
EPA E (2002) Drinking water advisory: consumer acceptability advice and health effects analysis on sulfate (draft). USA
Eichhoff J, Hehl A, Jockenhoevel S, Gries T (2013) Textile fabrication technologies for embedding electronic functions into fibres, yarns and fabrics. In: Multidisciplinary know-how for smart-textiles developers. Woodhead Publishing, pp 191–226
FAO (2009) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1–134
De Falco F, Gullo MP, Gentile G, Di Pace E, Cocca M, Gelabert L, Brouta-Agnésa M, Rovira A, Escudero R, Villalba R, Mossotti R, Montarsolo A, Gavignano S, Tonin C, Villalba R (2018) Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics. Environ Pollut 236:916–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.057
Fallahzadeh RA, Khosravi R, Dehdashti B, Ghahramani E, Omidi F, Adli A, Miri M (2018) Spatial distribution variation and probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to chromium in ground water supplies; a case study in the east of Iran. Food Chem Toxicol 115:260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.03.019
Fedajev A, Nikolić R, Urošević S (2010) The importance of textile industry in the economy of Serbia. Tekst Ind 58(2):25–32
Fendall LS, Sewell MA (2009) Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers. Mar Pollut Bull 58(8):1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025
Fernandes FH, Bustos-Obregon E, Salvadori DMF (2015) Disperse Red 1 (textile dye) induces cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in mouse germ cells. Reprod Toxicol 53:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.04.002
Ferraz ER, Grando MD, Oliveira DP (2011) The azo dye disperse orange 1 induces DNA damage and cytotoxic effects but does not cause ecotoxic effects in Daphnia similis and Vibrio fischeri. J Hazard Mater 192(2):628–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.063
Frias J, Gago J, Otero V, Sobral P (2016) Microplastics in coastal sediments from Southern Portuguese shelf waters. Mar Environ Res 114:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.12.006
Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92(3):407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011
Gao H, Yang B-J, Li N, Feng L-M, Shi X-Y, Zhao W-H, Liu S-J (2015) Bisphenol A and hormone-associated cancers: current progress and perspectives. Medicine 94(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000211
Ghaly A, Ananthashankar R, Alhattab M, Ramakrishnan V (2014) Production, characterization and treatment of textile effluents: a critical review. J Chem Eng Process Technol 5(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000182
Gita S, Shukla S, Saharan N, Prakash C, Deshmukhe G (2019) Toxic Effects of selected textile dyes on elemental composition, photosynthetic pigments, protein content and growth of a freshwater chlorophycean alga Chlorella vulgaris. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 102(6):795–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-019-02599-w
Gähr F, Hermanutz F, Oppermann W (1994) Ozonation—an important technique to comply with new German laws for textile wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 30(3):255
Güleryüz Ö (2011) Textile sector and future in Turkey in global developments. M.Sc. thesis. Isparta, Turkey
Haq I, Raj A (2018) Biodegradation of Azure-B dye by Serratia liquefaciens and its validation by phytotoxicity, genotoxicity and cytotoxicity studies. Chemosphere 196:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.153
Hartline NL, Bruce NJ, Karba SN, Ruff EO, Sonar SU, Holden PA (2016) Microfiber masses recovered from conventional machine washing of new or aged garments. Environ Sci Technol 50(21):11532–11538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03045
Hassan MM, Carr CM (2018) A critical review on recent advancements of the removal of reactive dyes from dyehouse effluent by ion-exchange adsorbents. Chemosphere 209:201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.043
Henry B, Laitala K, Klepp IG (2019) Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment. Sci Total Environ 652:483–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166
Herbst W, Hunger K (1997) Industrial Organic Pigments, 2nd completely revised edn. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Hernandez E, Nowack B, Mitrano DM (2017) Polyester textiles as a source of microplastics from households: a mechanistic study to understand microfiber release during washing. Environ Sci Technol 51(12):7036–7046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01750
Herrera-González AM, Caldera-Villalobos M, Peláez-Cid A-A (2019) Adsorption of textile dyes using an activated carbon and crosslinked polyvinyl phosphonic acid composite. J Environ Manage 234:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.012
Von der Heyden C, New M (2004) Groundwater pollution on the Zambian Copperbelt: deciphering the source and the risk. Sci Total Environ 327(1–3):17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.08.028
Hossain L, Sarker SK, Khan MS (2018) Evaluation of present and future wastewater impacts of textile dyeing industries in Bangladesh. Environ Dev 26:23–33
Hossain I (2011) Textile knowledge. Available from: https://textileknowledge.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/flow-chart-for-combedyarn1.jpg. Accessed: 8 June 2011
Hsu C-H, Stedeford T (2010) Cancer risk assessment: chemical carcinogenesis, hazard evaluation, and risk quantification. Wiley
Hubadillah SK, Othman MHD, Tai ZS, Jamalludin MR, Yusuf NK, Ahmad A, Rahman MA, Jaafar J, Kadir SHSA, Harun Z (2020) Novel hydroxyapatite-based bio-ceramic hollow fiber membrane derived from waste cow bone for textile wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 379:122396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122396
Hunger K (2007) Industrial dyes: chemistry, properties, applications
Hwang J, Choi D, Han S, Choi J, Hong J (2019) An assessment of the toxicity of polypropylene microplastics in human derived cells. Sci Total Environ 684:657–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.071
Imran M, Crowley DE, Khalid A, Hussain S, Mumtaz MW, Arshad M (2015) Microbial biotechnology for decolorization of textile wastewaters. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol 14(1):73–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-014-9344-4
Imtiazuddin S, Tiki S, Chemicals A (2018) Impact of textile wastewater pollution on the environment. Pak Text J 10:38–39
Jaganathan V, Cherurveettil P, Chellasamy A, Premapriya M (2014) Environmental pollution risk analysis and management in textile industry: a preventive mechanism. Eur Sci J, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1.1.685.6416&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=522
Jain R, Mathur M, Sikarwar S, Mittal A (2007) Removal of the hazardous dye rhodamine B through photocatalytic and adsorption treatments. J Environ Manage 85(4):956–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.002
John E, Laskow TC, Buchser WJ, Pitt BR, Basse PH, Butterfield LH, Kalinski P, Lotze MT (2010) Zinc in innate and adaptive tumor immunity. J Transl Med 8(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-8-118
Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2012.41004
Karim ME, Dhar K, Hossain MT (2018) Decolorization of textile reactive dyes by bacterial monoculture and consortium screened from textile dyeing effluent. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16(2):375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.02.005
Katheresan V, Kansedo J, Lau SY (2018) Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 6(4):4676–4697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060
Kawecki D, Nowack B (2019) Polymer-specific modeling of the environmental emissions of seven commodity plastics as macro-and microplastics. Environ Sci Technol 53(16):9664–9676. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02900
Kay P, Hiscoe R, Moberley I, Bajic L, McKenna N (2018) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics in river catchments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(20):20264–20267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2070-7
Keith-Roach MJ (2008) The speciation, stability, solubility and biodegradation of organic co-contaminant radionuclide complexes: a review. Sci Total Environ 396(1):1–11
Khandare RV, Govindwar SP (2015) Phytoremediation of textile dyes and effluents: current scenario and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 33(8):1697–1714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.09.003
Khandare RV, Govindwar SP (2016) Microbial degradation mechanism of textile dye and its metabolic pathway for environmental safety. Environ Waste Manag, 399–439
Khatri J, Nidheesh P, Singh TA, Kumar MS (2018) Advanced oxidation processes based on zero-valent aluminium for treating textile wastewater. Chem Eng J 348:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.074
Khehra MS, Saini HS, Sharma DK, Chadha BS, Chimni SS (2006) Biodegradation of azo dye CI Acid Red 88 by an anoxic–aerobic sequential bioreactor. Dyes Pigm 70(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.12.021
Koprivanac N, Bosanac G, Grabaric Z, Papic S (1993) Treatment of wastewaters from dye industry. Environ Technol 14(4):385–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593339309385304
Kumar S, Sharma A (2019) Cadmium toxicity: effects on human reproduction and fertility. Rev Environ Health 34(4):327–338. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2019-0016/html
Kushwaha AK, Gupta N, Chattopadhyaya M (2014) Removal of cationic methylene blue and malachite green dyes from aqueous solution by waste materials of Daucus carota. J Saudi Chem Soc 18(3):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2011.06.011
Laing I (1991) The impact of effluent regulations on the dyeing industry. Rev Prog Color Relat Top 21(1):56–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1991.tb00081.x
Lawrence CA (2003) Fundamentals of Spun Yarn technology, 1st edn., CRC Press, UK, p 552. ISBN 9781566768214
Lei L, Wu S, Lu S, Liu M, Song Y, Fu Z, He D (2018) Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Total Environ 619:1–8
Lord PR (2003) Handbook of Yarn Production, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, UK, p 504 (2003). ISBN 9781855736962
Lyon (2010) Some aromatic amines, organic dyes and related exposures. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
Magrì D, Sanchez-Moreno P, Caputo G, Gatto F, Veronesi M, Bardi G, Fragouli D (2018) Laser ablation as a versatile tool to mimic polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastic pollutants: characterization and toxicology assessment. ACS Nano 12(8):7690–7700
Mahapatra N (2016) Textile dyes. Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. New Delhi. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Mahmoud A, Ghaly A, Brooks M (2007) Removal of dye from textile wastewater using plant oils under different pH and temperature conditions. Am J Environ Sci 3(4):205–218. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2007
Mahurpawar M (2015) Effects of heavy metals on human health. Int J Res Granthaalayah 3(9SE):1–7. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i9SE.2015.3282
Malik SN, Ghosh PC, Vaidya AN, Waindeskar V, Das S, Mudliar SN (2017) Comparison of coagulation, ozone and ferrate treatment processes for color, COD and toxicity removal from complex textile wastewater. Water Sci Technol 76(5):1001–1010
Mallongi A, Indra R, Arief MKM, Satrianegara MF (2020) Environmental pollution and health problems due to forest fires with CO2 parameters. Med Leg Update 20(3):888–892
Mani S, Bharagava RN (2016) Exposure to crystal violet, its toxic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on environment and its degradation and detoxification for environmental safety. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 237:71–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23573-8_4
Martin S, Griswold W (2009) Human health effects of heavy metals. Environ Sci Technol Briefs Citizens 15:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1.1.399.9831&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Mia R, Selim M, Shamim A, Chowdhury M, Sultana S, Armin M, Hossain M, Akter R, Dey S, Naznin H (2019) Review on various types of pollution problem in textile dyeing and printing industries of Bangladesh and recommandation for mitigation. J Text Eng Fashion Technol 5(4):220–226
Mocchegiani E, Costarelli L, Giacconi R, Piacenza F, Basso A, Malavolta M (2011) Zinc, metallothioneins and immunosenescence: effect of zinc supply as nutrigenomic approach. Biogerontology 12(5):455–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-011-9337-4
Modak (1991) Environmental aspects of the textile industry: a technical guide. Prepared for United Nations Environment Programme Industry and Environment Office. http://www.miga.org/documents/Textiles.pdf
Morón FP (1994) Operaciones fundamentales en la hilatura de fibras textiles. Hespérides
Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B (2016) Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 50(11):5800–5808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05416
Mushtaq N, Singh DV, Bhat RA, Dervash MA, bin Hameed O (2020) Freshwater contamination: sources and hazards to aquatic biota. In: Fresh water pollution dynamics and remediation. Springer, pp 27–50
Muthu SS (2014) Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing: eco-friendly raw materials, technologies, and processing methods. Springer
Napper IE, Thompson RC (2016) Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: effects of fabric type and washing conditions. Mar Pollut Bull 112(1–2):39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025
Neefus JD (1982) Textile industrial processes. In: Cralley LV, Cralley LJ (eds) Industrial hygiene aspects of plant operations, volume 1, process flows. MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, NY
Newman MC (2015) Fundamentals of ecotoxicology: the science of pollution. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Oecotextiles (2012) Textile industry poses environmental hazards. Available at http://www.oecotextiles.com/PDF/textile_industry_hazards.pdf,accessed. Accessed 1 Dec 12
Parshetti G, Parshetti S, Telke A, Kalyani D, Doong R, Govindwar SP (2011) Biodegradation of crystal violet by Agrobacterium radiobacter. J Environ Sci 23(8):1384–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60547-5
Pearson RJ, Wilson T, Wang R (2006) Endogenous hydrogen sulfide and the cardiovascular system—what’s the smell all about? Clin Invest Med 29(3):146
Pimentel JC, Avila R, Lourenço AG (1975) Respiratory disease caused by synthetic fibres: a new occupational disease. Thorax 30(2):204–219. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.30.2.204
Pirc U, Vidmar M, Mozer A, Kržan A (2016) Emissions of microplastic fibers from microfiber fleece during domestic washing. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):22206–22211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7703-0
Piątkowska M, Jedziniak P, Olejnik M, Żmudzki J, Posyniak A (2018) Absence of evidence or evidence of absence? a transfer and depletion study of Sudan I in eggs. Food Chem 239:598–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.156
Pohanish RP (2017) Sittig’s handbook of toxic and hazardous chemicals and carcinogens. William Andrew
Poma A, Vecchiotti G, Colafarina S, Zarivi O, Aloisi M, Arrizza L, Chichiriccò G, Di Carlo P (2019) In vitro genotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles on the human fibroblast Hs27 cell line. Nanomaterials 9(9):1299. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091299
Popli S, Patel UD (2015) Destruction of azo dyes by anaerobic–aerobic sequential biological treatment: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(1):405–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0499-x
Pérez JB, Arrieta AG, Encinas AH, Dios AQ (2016) Textile engineering and case based reasoning. Paper presented at the distributed computing and artificial intelligence, 13th international conference
Pérez JJ-B, Arrieta AG, Encinas AH, Dios MAQ (2017) Manufacturing processes in the textile industry. Expert systems for fabrics production. ADCAIJ Adv Distrib Comput Artif Intell J 6(4):15–23
Pönkä A (1990) Absenteeism and respiratory disease among children and adults in Helsinki in relation to low-level air pollution and temperature. Environ Res 52(1):34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80149-5
Rasel S, Sarkar J (2019) Manufacturing of fabric by recycling plastic bottles: an ecological approach part 2: manufacturing process
Razzaque MS (2011) Phosphate toxicity: new insights into an old problem. Clin Sci 120(3):91–97. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20100377
Rehman U, Khan S, Muhammad S (2020) Ingestion of arsenic-contaminated drinking water leads to health risk and traces in human biomarkers (hair, nails, blood, and urine), Pakistan. Exposure Health 12(2):243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00308-w
Rehman K, Shahzad T, Sahar A, Hussain S, Mahmood F, Siddique MH, Siddique MA, Rashid MI (2018) Effect of reactive black 5 azo dye on soil processes related to C and N cycling. PeerJ 6:e4802. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4802
Reno AL, Brooks EG, Ameredes BT (2015) Mechanisms of heightened airway sensitivity and responses to inhaled SO2 in asthmatics. Environ Health Insights (EHI) 9:S15671. https://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S15671
Roman HA, Walsh TL, Coull BA, Dewailly É, Guallar E, Hattis D, Mariën K, Schwartz J, Stern AH, Virtanen JK, Virtanen JK (2011) Evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of methylmercury exposures: current evidence supports development of a dose–response function for regulatory benefits analysis. Environ Health Perspect 119(5):607–614. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003012
Rutter GA (2010) Think zinc: new roles for zinc in the control of insulin secretion. Islets 2(1):49–50. https://doi.org/10.4161/isl.2.1.10259
Sandhya S (2010) Biodegradation of azo dyes under anaerobic condition: role of azoreductase. In: Biodegradation of azo dyes, pp 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2009_43
Sarker BC, Baten MA, Eqram M, Haque U, Das AK, Hossain A, Hasan MZ (2015) Heavy metals concentration in textile and garments industries’ wastewater of Bhaluka industrial area, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Curr World Environ 10(1):61. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.10.1.07
Saxena S, Raja A (2014) Natural dyes: sources, chemistry, application and sustainability issues roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing. Springer, pp 37–80
Saxena S, Raja A, Arputharaj A (2017) Challenges in sustainable wet processing of textiles textiles and clothing sustainability. Springer, pp 43–79
Setiadi T, Andriani Y, Erlania M (2006) Treatment of textile wastewater by a combination of anaerobic and aerobic processes: a denim processing plant case. Southeast Asian Water Environ 1. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780402987
Shakir K, Elkafrawy AF, Ghoneimy HF, Beheir SGE, Refaat M (2010) Removal of rhodamine B (a basic dye) and thoron (an acidic dye) from dilute aqueous solutions and wastewater simulants by ion flotation. Water Res 44(5):1449–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.029
Shamey R, Zhao X (2014) Modelling, simulation and control of the dyeing process. Elsevier
Sharma S (2012) Energy management in textile industry. Int JPower Syst Oper Energy Manage ISSN (PRINT) 2(1):2
Sharma RK, Agrawal M, Marshall FM (2004) Effects of waste water irrigation on heavy metal accumulation in soil and plants. Paper presented at a National Seminar, Bangalore University, Bangalore, Abstract no. 7, p 8
Shelley T (1994) Dye pollution clean-up by synthetic mineral. Int Dyer 79:26–31
Shivanthan MC, Perera H, Jayasinghe S, Karunanayake P, Chang T, Ruwanpathirana S, Jayasinghe N, De Silva Y, Jayaweerabandara D (2013) Hydrogen sulphide inhalational toxicity at a petroleum refinery in Sri Lanka: a case series of seven survivors following an industrial accident and a brief review of medical literature. J Occup Med Toxicol 8(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-8-9
Sillanpää M, Sainio P (2017) Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(23):19313–19321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9621-1
Singare P, Lokhande R, Naik K (2010) A case study of some lakes located at and around thane city of Maharashtra, India, with special reference to physico-chemical properties and heavy metal content of lake water. Interdiscip Environ Rev 11(1):90–107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IER.2010.034608
Singare PU, Lokhande RS, Pathak PP (2010) Soil pollution along Kalwa Bridge at Thane Creek of Maharashtra, India. J Environ Protect 1(02):121. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2010.12016
Sinha S, Singh R, Chaurasia AK, Nigam S (2016) Self-sustainable Chlorella pyrenoidosa strain NCIM 2738 based photobioreactor for removal of Direct Red-31 dye along with other industrial pollutants to improve the water-quality. J Hazard Mater 306:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.011
Sivakumar D (2014) Role of Lemna minor Lin. in treating the textile industry wastewater. Int J Environ Ecolog Geol Mining Eng 8:55–59
Sivarajasekar N, Baskar R (2014) Adsorption of basic red 9 on activated waste Gossypium hirsutum seeds: process modeling, analysis and optimization using statistical design. J Ind Eng Chem 20(5):2699–2709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.10.058
Slater K (2003) Environmental impact of textiles: production, processes and protection, vol 27. Woodhead Publishing
Spencer DJ (2001) Knitting technology: a comprehensive handbook and practical guide, vol 16. CRC press
Statista (2016) Textile data of different countries. https://www.statista.com/search/?q=Textile+data+globally&qKat=newSearchFilter&sortMethod=idrelevance&isRegionPref=1&statistics=1&accuracy=and&isoregion=0&isocountrySearch=&category=0&interval=0&archive=1
Ströhle J, Beninger AG (2008) Protecting the environment through waste water recycling and heat recovery in textile finishing. Benninger AG Uzwil, Switzerland
Sugiyama M, Tsuzuki K, Lin X, Costa M (1992) Potentiation of sodium chromate (VI)-induced chromosomal aberrations and mutation by vitamin B2 in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Mutat Res Lett 283(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(92)90109-U
Suzuki D, Dressel H (2002) Good news for a change: hope for a troubled planet. Stoddart Toronto
Tanveer MA, Zafar S (2012) The stagnant performance of textile industry in Pakistan. Eur J Sci Res 77(3):362–372
Tanvir SI, Mahmood T (2014) Solid waste for knit fabric: quantification and ratio analysis. J Environ Earth Sci 4(12):68–80
Textile World (2008) Water and energy-saving solutions. TW special report. Mar/Apr 2008. http://www.textileworld.com/Issues/2008/March-April/Dyeing_Printing_and_Finishing/Water-And_Energy-Saving_Solutions
Thompson J, Bannigan J (2008) Cadmium: toxic effects on the reproductive system and the embryo. Reprod Toxicol 25(3):304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.02.001
Tian F, Guo G, Zhang C, Yang F, Hu Z, Liu C, Wang S-W (2019) Isolation, cloning and characterization of an azoreductase and the effect of salinity on its expression in a halophilic bacterium. Int J Biol Macromol 123:1062–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.175
Towns A (2013) Colorant, textile. In: Luo R (eds) Encyclopedia of color science and technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27581-8_161_10
Tüfekci N, Sivri N, Toroz İ (2007) Pollutants of textile industry wastewater and assessment of its discharge limits by water quality standards. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 7(2)
USEPA (2017) US EPA Office of Research and Development (USEPA), 2017 US EPA Office of Research and Development (USEPA). In: Exposure factors handbook (Chapter 5) (Update). Soil and Dust Ingestion. Accessed 22 Mar 2019
Uddin F (2019) Introductory chapter: textile manufacturing processes textile manufacturing processes. IntechOpen
Vallero D (2014) Fundamentals of air pollution. Academic Press
Van der Velden NM, Patel MK, Vogtländer JG (2014) LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):331–356
Vietnam Cleaner Production Centre (2000) Mini-guide to cleaner production. VNCPC, Vietnam, pp 1‒24
Virtanen JK, Voutilainen S, Rissanen TH, Mursu J, Tuomainen T-P, Korhonen MJ, Salonen JT (2005) Mercury, fish oils, and risk of acute coronary events and cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality in men in eastern Finland. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25(1):228–233. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000150040.20950.61
WHO (1997) World health organization: nitrogen oxides - environmental health criteria 188
WTO (2020) World Trade Report 2020: government policies to promote innovation in the digital age. WTO, Geneva. https://doi.org/10.30875/60123dd4-en
Wang ZL (2008) Splendid one-dimensional nanostructures of zinc oxide: a new nanomaterial family for nanotechnology. ACS Nano 2(10):1987–1992
Wang R (2012) Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: a whiff exploration that blossomed. Physiol Rev 92(2):791–896. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00017.2011
Wang L, Wang L, Ding W, Zhang F (2010) Acute toxicity of ferric oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(12):8617–8624. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2483
Wang D (2016) Environmental protection in clothing industry. Paper presented at the sustainable development: proceedings of the 2015 international conference on sustainable development (ICSD2015)
Wanyonyi WC, Onyari JM, Shiundu PM, Mulaa FJ (2019) Effective biotransformation of reactive black 5 dye using crude protease from Bacillus cereus strain KM201428. Energy Proc 157:815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.247
Wardman RH (2017) An introduction to textile coloration: principles and practice. Wiley
World Health Organization (2004) Sulfate in drinking-water–background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality
Wu B, Wu X, Liu S, Wang Z, Chen L (2019) Size-dependent effects of polystyrene microplastics on cytotoxicity and efflux pump inhibition in human Caco-2 cells. Chemosphere 221:333–341
Xia H, Chen L, Fang Y (2013) Highly efficient removal of Congo red from wastewater by nano-cao. Sep Sci Technol 48(17):2681–2687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2013.805340
Xu M, Halimu G, Zhang Q, Song Y, Fu X, Li Y, Li Y, Zhang H (2019) Internalization and toxicity: a preliminary study of effects of nanoplastic particles on human lung epithelial cell. Sci Total Environ 694:133794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133794
Yacout DM, Abd El-Kawi M, Hassouna M (2016) Cradle to gate environmental impact assessment of acrylic fiber manufacturing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(3):326–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1023-3
Yuan Y, Ning X-A, Zhang Y, Lai X, Li D, He Z, Chen X (2020) Chlorobenzene levels, component distribution, and ambient severity in wastewater from five textile dyeing wastewater treatment plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 193:110257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110257
Zhuang M, Sanganyado E, Zhang X, Xu L, Zhu J, Liu W, Song H (2020) Azo dye degrading bacteria tolerant to extreme conditions inhabit nearshore ecosystems: optimization and degradation pathways. J Environ Manage 261:110222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110222
Zollinger H (2003) Color chemistry: syntheses, properties, and applications of organic dyes and pigments. Wiley
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sarwar, T., Khan, S. (2022). Textile Industry: Pollution Health Risks and Toxicity. In: Muthu, S.S., Khadir, A. (eds) Textile Wastewater Treatment. Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2832-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2832-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2831-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2832-1
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)