Abstract
Surge waves are commonly observed in numerous hydrodynamic events such as dam breaks, tidal bores, and tsunami and they occur due to abrupt changes in flow. The characteristics of surge waves depend on surge Froude number. Herein, we conduct a numerical investigation to study in detail their highly turbulent wave front, sharp discontinuity of pressure and velocity, and air entrainment properties. In conducting our numerical investigations, we use and modify an open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics tool, OpenFOAM. The interFoam solver is utilized based on the Volume of Fluid method to capture the nature of two-phase flow. Large Eddy Simulation using Smagorinsky sub-grid scale viscosity is employed to create small-scale and larger than grid-scale vortices. The simulations are implemented for a 2-D computational domain for a wide range of breaking surge Froude numbers from 1.60 to 2.49. Results reveal that air entrainment level rises when more in-depth vortices are present at higher surge Froude numbers. The shifted instantaneous water depth perturbation profiles manifest two peaks: one near the surge toe and another in the vicinity of the heel. The distance between these two peaks is defined as the surge length which is linked to surge Froude number. In addition, at \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 2.13, surge toe has a smaller aeration depth against the heel.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Surge waves form due to sudden changes in flow conditions. Positive surge waves commonly occur in the natural system and hydraulic conveyance structures. Closure of sluice gates in water management and hydropower plants induce an abrupt change in velocity leading to the formation of a pressure wave. Tsunami waves and tidal bores also exhibit the characteristics of flow discontinuity with respect to pressure and velocity profiles. Such phenomena exhibit high turbulence, which contributes to air entrainment, sediment gathering, and induces contaminant and debris transport [14]. Turbulent structures located under the front of the tidal bore may lead to bed erosion [5] and the adjacent community’s flooding damage [22]. Bed erosion results in river channel expansion, adverse effect on water safety and habitat environment, and jeopardizes bridges over the river [7]. Like tidal bores, the dam-break waves cause sediment movement and channel bed erosion and can cause swift changes in the bed formation across the channel downstream. Consequently, the flow will be altered, and the estimation of factors such as peak water depth and time to reach the residence area for alert purposes will become difficult [24]. The related studies of dam-break waves date back to [19], who applied equations of motion to the dam-break case. Reference [8] presented laboratory studies for dam-break waves over various roughness of flume beds and verified its outcomes with the theoretical solutions. Although the experimental studies of dam-break waves are getting more attention, the overall number of experimental studies is still limited (e.g., [6, 18, 20]). In recent years, several studies have been carried out to investigate the air entrainment and turbulent patterns of moving and stationary surge waves experimentally (e.g., [11, 12]). Most of the existing experimental studies are based on single point measurements and the overall turbulent characteristics cannot be obtained. Reference [15] are among the first to numerically simulate surge waves, where they have presented the turbulent behaviour within the waves.
In the 2000s, the air entrainment nature of the dam-break waves, also known as “white water”, has been focused on. Several experimental studies of dam-break waves were conducted over the stepped channel and using conductivity probes have determined the air entrainment over the vertical axis and bubble dimensions (e.g., [4, 2]). As for the numerical simulation, the widely used volume of fluid (VOF) method for interface capture was proposed by Reference [9]. For aeration near the interface due to the turbulence, Hirt and Souders [10] firstly introduced for FLOW-3D® to calculate the air fraction based on the comparison between “stabilizing forces” and “destabilizing forces” near the interface. More recently, [23] have developed a calibration approach to determine the ideal magnitude for adjustable parameters in the same model. Lubin and Glockner [16] also demonstrated the numerical work of aeration in plunging waves. Advanced numerical methods allow us to address mixing and air entrainment in dam-break waves and surge waves. Furthermore, this allows a detailed description of complex features of flow [10]. Based on the literature review, there are several numerical and experimental approaches to study the turbulent structure and the air entrainment properties of the surge waves individually. However, few studies have connected two aspects at different Froude numbers numerically. Therefore, within the positive surge waves, the research project studies the interconnection between the turbulence and aeration characteristics numerically and improves compliance with the experimental data available.
2 Methodology
2.1 Governing Equations and Numerical Solutions
In order to resolve the turbulent motion at the surge front, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is employed. The governing equations for LES are obtained by filtering the Navier–Stokes equation:
where \(\overline{{{\text{u}}_{{\text{i}}} }}\) and \({\overline{\text{p}}}\) are the filtered velocity and pressure, respectively. Equation 1 is presented in the suffix notation and \({\text{i or j = 1}}\) in this notation corresponds to the x-direction, \({\text{i or j = 2}}\) corresponds to the y-direction, and \({\text{i or j = 3}}\) to the z-direction. The sub-grid scale (SGS) turbulent shear stress is expressed as:
The SGS turbulence model defines this filtered turbulent shear stress:
where \({\text{S}}_{{{\text{ij}}}}\) is the strain rate and defined as:
The eddy viscosity of the SGS motion is constructed based on the Smagorisnky-Lilly model [21]:
where \(\Delta\) is the filter size of the sub-grid scale model, represented as the size of the mesh, and \({\text{C}}_{{\text{s}}}\) is the Smagorinsky constant.
The air–water interface model is based on the volume of fluid (VOF) method for identifying the boundary between water and air. In this method, the interface can be determined by introducing the water volume fraction, \({\upalpha }_{{\text{w}}}\) [1]:
In Eq. 6 \({\text{u}}_{{\text{c}}}\) represents the “relative velocity” for water and air. \(\alpha_{{\text{w}}} = 1\) demonstrates the cells filled with water, and \(\alpha_{{\text{w}}} = 0\) for the cells filled with air only. The interface, surge front, and in-depth where air entrainment is expected, the water volume fraction is \(0 < \alpha_{{\text{w}}} < 1\).
2.2 Implementation in OpenFOAM
The computational domain is shown in Fig. 1. The gate is located at \({\text{x = 0}}\). The computational domain is extended from \({\text{x = }} - {\text{L}}_{{{\text{xu}}}}\) upstream to \({\text{x}} = {\text{L}}_{{{\text{xd}}}}\) downstream of the gate. With the removal of the gate, a surge wave propagates downstream with a celerity of \({\text{c}}\) and depth of \({\text{d}}_{{2}}\). The initial water depth before the gate is \({\text{d}}_{{0}}\) and the downstream water depth is \({\text{d}}_{{1}}\). The domain is surrounded by rigid walls on three sides with the upper face open to the atmosphere. The boundary conditions for velocity and pressure are coupled as no-slip and fixed flux pressure, respectively. Surge Froude number is defined based on the unperturbed water depth and velocity downstream of the surge wave:
Here, the initial velocity \({\text{U}}_{{1}} { = 0}.\) References [13] and [25] have reported undular waves at surge Froude numbers up to \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}} { } \approx { 1}{\text{.5}}\). This paper, therefore, covers surge Froude numbers beyond this range as it aims to investigate the turbulent properties across the surge breaking front. The initial water depths, \({\text{d}}_{{0}}\) and \({\text{d}}_{{1}}\), and the domain dimensions, \({\text{L}}_{{{\text{xd}}}}\) and \({\text{L}}_{{{\text{xu}}}}\), are determined based on the Method of Characteristics (MOC). According to the MOC, the \({\text{d}}_{{0}}\) and \({\text{d}}_{{1}}\) ratio dominates the expecting \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) [2]:
Using the theoretical celerity of positive surge (c), obtained from Eq. 8, and the celerity of negative surge (\({\text{c}}_{{0}} { = }\sqrt {{\text{gd}}_{{0}} }\)), the length of the computational domain before and after the gate, \({\text{L}}_{{{\text{xu}}}} {\text{ and L}}_{{{\text{xd}}}}\), are selected. The uniform square mesh of the size of \(\Delta {\text{x}} = \Delta {\text{y}}\) is implemented. Figure 1 illustrates the Area of Interest (AI), where local mesh refinement of the size of \({\text{dx = dy}}\) is implemented. This provided increased resolution around the surge front and behind the surge. Table 1 summarizes the flow conditions for 3 surge Froude numbers \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}} { = }\) 1.60, 2.13, and 2.49.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Mixing and Vorticity Profile
The simulations are conducted for 3 surge Froude numbers. VOF provides one velocity for water and air combined. To distinguish between water and air in Fig. 2, the product of vorticity, \({\upzeta }\), and water volume fraction, \({\upalpha }_{{\text{w}}}\), is plotted as \(\zeta_{{\text{w}}} = \alpha_{{\text{w}}} \zeta\). Figure 2a, b and c illustrate the \(\zeta_{{\text{w}}}\) profiles at 3 time steps for \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 1.60, 2.13, and 2.49, respectively. As seen in Fig. 2a, the mixing at \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 1.60 over the length of the surge is confined to the surface. Behind the surge, the advected vortices induce mixing in depth. However, this in-depth mixing behind the surge is mainly confined to \({\text{y}} > {\text{d}}_{{1}}\). For \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 2.49, on the other hand, the mixing in the surge front induces more in-depth mixing. The surge wave is often characterized by the recirculating flow at the air–water interface and a shear layer that is induced at the surge toe [3]. The deeper reach of vortices behind the surge can be explained by the extension of the mixing cone in the shear layer. At lower surge Froude numbers, the velocity gradient is smaller, which leads to a weaker shear layer. This, in turn, results in limited mixing at the surge front.
The corresponding air concentration profiles for Fig. 2 are given in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3a, the air entrainment is confined to behind the surge at all three instances. Furthermore, the size of the air pockets (shown in white) for \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 1.60 is small. On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 3c, air entrainment induced by the coherent structures across the surge front reaches the full depth. The air pockets also entail larger envelopes, visible by large white patches in this figure. This is similar to observations made by Reference [17]. For stationary hydraulic jumps, with Froude numbers ranging from 5.1 to 8.3, they reported that bubble size increases with the Froude number.
3.2 Water Depth Profiles and Perturbation
In order to investigate the water depth and phase change with time, the profiles of surge waves have to be translated. All the obtained profiles at different times, t, are shifted by a length of \({\text{L}}_{{{\text{lag}}}} {\text{ = ct}},\) where c is the theoretical surge wave celerity. This space lag has translated the moving surge wave at different instances to a standing wave, where the approximate positions of the surge front at different instances coincide. Water depth profiles are selected at \(\alpha_{{\text{w}}} = {0}{\text{.5}}\).
The average space lag profiles are presented in Fig. 4(a1) and (b1) for \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 1.60 and 2.49, respectively. The average profile for each Froude number is obtained using the instantaneous profiles at about 60 instances after a fully developed turbulent surge wave was observed. Similarly, the water depth perturbations are estimated based on average and instantaneous profiles. These perturbations are plotted in Fig. 4(a2) and (b2). Water depth perturbation envelopes, marking the minimum and maximum levels of water depth perturbations, are also plotted in these figures. In both surge Froude numbers one distinct peak can be identified close to the surge toe. Across the length of the surge, the normal water depth perturbation, \({\text{h}}^{^{\prime}} /{\overline{\text{h}}}\), is generally lower. However, the perturbation peaks again around the surge heel. This is clear, specially at higher surge Froude number of \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 2.49. Figure 4(a3) and (b3) demonstrate the magnitude of water depth perturbation, where the primary peak at the toe and the secondary peak at the heel are visible.
Based on the observation from water depth and magnitude of water depth perturbation plots in Figs. 4(a3) and (b3), surge length, \({\text{L}}_{{\text{s}}} ,\) at different \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) can be estimated. The surge lengths plotted in Fig. 5 are the distance between two peaks observed in the magnitude of water depth perturbation. The estimated \({\text{L}}_{{\text{s}}}\)/\({\text{d}}_{{1}}\) and \({\text{L}}_{{\text{s}}}\)/\({\text{d}}_{{2}}\) are plotted against \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) in Fig. 5. As shown in this figure, both normalized surge lengths, \({\text{L}}_{{\text{s}}}\)/\({\text{d}}_{{1}}\) and \({\text{L}}_{{\text{s}}}\)/\({\text{d}}_{{2}}\), increase with surge Froude number, \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\). Along with our observations from Figs. 2 and 3, this indicated that both the mixing length and strength of the recirculating flow near the air–water interface change with the surge Froude number.
3.3 Air Concentration Near Surge Toe and Heel
For air entrainment profiles, we have also applied the space-lag approach. All the profiles are translated with a distance of \({\text{L}}_{{{\text{lag}}}} {\text{ = ct}}{.}\) Fig. 6 illustrates 10, 50, and 90 percentiles of air concentration in depth, as well as the average air concentration profile. Figure 6a and c demonstrate such profiles close to heel and toe, respectively. The depth between the 10 and 90 percentiles in the profile closer to the toe is smaller than the analogous depth for a profile closer to the heel. This trend demonstrates lower air entrainment depth closer to the toe, which is attributed to this profile's vicinity to the tip of the mixing cone.
4 Conclusion
Positive surge waves generated from a sudden opening of the sluice gate are simulated in this study. Various breaking surge Froude numbers in the range of \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 1.60–2.49 are studied. We have employed the combination of Large Eddy Simulation and Volume of Fluid to capture the detailed structures of the turbulent flow and patterns of air entrainment behind the surge wave. At low Froude numbers, the mixing induced by vortices is limited to the vicinity of the air–water interface. These vortices reach a greater depth at higher Froude numbers, leading to higher levels of air entrainment both near the surface and in-depth. Average water depth profiles, perturbation envelope and magnitude, are also generated by shifting and averaging the instantaneous water depth profiles. Two perturbation peaks are observed in the vicinity of the surge heel and surge toe. These peaks are used to define the surge length, which then is plotted against the surge Froude number. Furthermore, for \({\text{Fr}}_{{1}}\) = 2.13, a smaller aeration depth is observed at the surge toe compared to the heel. Our numerical simulations shed light on the detailed structures of a transient surge wave. Validation with existing experimental studies and further detailed analysis will be reported in a future publication.
References
Almeland SK (2018) Implementation of an air-entrainment Model in InterFoam. Technical Report, Proceedings of CFD with OpenSource Software, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.17196/OS_CFD#YEAR_2018
Chanson H (2004) The hydraulics of open channel flow: an introduction, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Burlington, MA, USA
Chanson H, Lubin P, Glockner S (2012) Unsteady turbulence in a shock: physical and numerical modelling in tidal bores and hydraulic jumps. Turbulence: theory, types and simulations. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, USA, pp 113–148
Chanson H (2003) Two-phase flow characteristics of an unsteady dam break wave flow. In: 30th IAHR congress, Thessaloniki, Greece, vol C2, pp 237–244
Chanson H, Tan Y (2018) Particle dispersion under tidal bores: application to sediments and fish eggs. In: 7th international conference on multiphase flow, Tampa, FL, USA, paper No 12.7.3
Chen YH, Simon DB (1979) An experimental study of hydraulic and geomorphic changes in an alluvial channel induced by failure of a dam. Water Resour Res 19(5):1183–1188
Department of Environment and Resource Management of Queensland (2009) What causes streambed erosion? Government Publications, Queensland, Australia
Dressler RF (1954) Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dam-break wave. Int Assoc Sci Hydrology 3(38):319–328
Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225
Hirt CW, Souders DT (2004) Modeling entrainment of air at turbulent free surfaces. In: World water and environmental resources congress, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Koch C, Chanson H (2009) Turbulence measurements in positive surges and bores. J Hydraul Res 47(1):29–40
Leng X, Chanson H (2016) Coupling between free-surface fluctuations, velocity fluctuations and turbulent reynolds stresses during the upstream propagation of positive surges, bores and compression waves. Environ Fluid Mech 16(4):695–719
Leng X, Chanson H (2017) Upstream propagation of surges and bores: free-surface observations. Coast Eng J 59(01):1750003
Li Y, Chanson H (2018) Sediment motion beneath surges and bores. In: 7th IAHR international symposium on hydraulic structures, Aachen, Germany
Lubin P, Glockner S, Chanson H (2010) Large eddy simulation of turbulence generated by a weak breaking tidal bore. Environ Fluid Mech 10(5):587–602
Lubin P, Glocknet S (2015) Numerical simulations of three-dimensional plunging breaking waves: generation and evolution of aerated vortex filaments. J Fluid Mech 767:364–393
Murzyn F, Chanson H (2007) Free surface, bubbly flow and turbulence measurements in hydraulic jumps. Hydraulic Model Reports, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, CH63/07
Nakagawa H, Nakamura S, Ichihashi K (1969) Generation and development of a hydraulic bore due to the breaking of a dam. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst 19(2):1–17
Pohle FV (1952) Motion of water due to breaking of a dam and related problems. In: Symposium on gravity waves, NBS Cire, 521
Schmidgall T, Strange JN (1961) Floods resulting from suddenly breached dams. Conditions of high resistance. Hydraulic model investigation. Miscellaneous Paper, Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I the basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164
Sulaiman A (2017) Environmental effect of tidal bore propagation in Kampar River. In: MATEC web of conferences, EDP Science, vol 103, p 01015
Valero D, García-Bartual R (2016) Calibration of an air entrainment model for CFD spillway applications. Adv Hydroinformatics 571–582
Zech Y, Soares-Frazão S, Spinewine B, Le Grelle N (2008) Dam-break induced sediment movement: experimental approaches and numerical modelling. J Hydraul Res 46(2):176–190
Zheng F, Li Y, Xuan G, Li Z, Zhu L (2018) Characteristics of positive surges in a rectangular channel. Water 10(10):1473
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, Z., Karimpour, S. (2022). Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Structures and Air Entrainment in Positive Surge Waves. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 250. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1065-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1065-4_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1064-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1065-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)