Skip to main content

Matrix Games with Linguistic Distribution Assessment Payoffs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Congress on Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 111))

  • 735 Accesses

Abstract

 In this paper, we propose a new concept of two-person constant-sum matrix games having payoffs in the form of linguistic distribution assessments. Such types of payoffs allow the players to express their opinion in terms of a whole fuzzy set and thus, are not limited to just one single term. To establish an equilibrium solution of these kinds of matrix games, first, we define the maxmin and minmax strategies to apply in case the players play pure strategies. In mixed strategies, we develop a linguistic distribution linear programming (LDLP) approach to find the players’ mixed strategies. The method is depicted as a generalization of that traditionally used in the solution of a classical game. The applicability of defined LDLP is illustrated with the help of an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(2):354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Herrera F, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8(4):337–364

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mendel JM (2007) Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics. Inf Sci 177(4):988–1006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zadeh LA (1996) Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(2):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zadeh LA (2001) From computing with numbers to computing with words-from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. In: Wang pp (ed) Computing with words. Wiley Series on Intelligent Systems. Wiley, pp 35–68

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yager RR (2004) On the retranslation process in Zadeh’s paradigm of computing with words. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 34(2):1184–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neumann JV, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bector CR, Chandra S, Vijay V (2004) Duality in linear programming with fuzzy parameters and matrix games with fuzzy payoffs. Fuzzy Sets Syst 146:253–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bector CR, Chandra S, Vijay V (2004) Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy linear programming duality. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 3:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bector CR, Chandra S (2005) Fuzzy mathematical programming and fuzzy matrix games. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Butnariu D (1978) Fuzzy games: a description of the concept. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:181–92

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Campos L (1989) Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games. Fuzzy Sets Syst 32:275–289

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Arfi B (2006) Linguistic fuzzy-logic game theory. J Conflict Resolut 50(1):28–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arfi B (2006) Linguistic fuzzy-logic social game of cooperation. Rationality Soc 18(4):471–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1990) Playing matrix games defined by linguistic labels. In: Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory. Theory and decision library (series B: mathematical and statistical methods), vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sahoo L (2017) Solving matrix games with linguistic payoffs. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10(4):484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh A, Gupta A, Mehra A (2018) Matrix games with 2-tuple linguistic information. Ann Oper Res 287:895–910

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrera F, Martínez L (2001) The 2-tuple linguistic computational model, advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 09:33–48

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Abchir MA, Truck I (2013) Towards an Extension of the 2-tuple linguistic model to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. arXiv 1304.5897v1, 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bartczuk L, Dziwiński P, Starczewski JT (2012) A new method for dealing with unbalanced linguistic term set. In: ICAISC 2012 Part I LNCS 7267, pp 207–212

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cai M, Gong Z, Yu X (2016) A method for unbalanced linguistic term sets and its application in group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(3):671–682

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cai M, Gong Z (2017) Group decision making using distances between unbalanced linguistic assessments. Appl Soft Comput 67:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang JH, Hao J (2006) A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(3):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang G, Dong Y, Xu Y (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barron EN (2011) Game theory: an introduction. Wiley, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parul Chauhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chauhan, P., Gupta, A. (2022). Matrix Games with Linguistic Distribution Assessment Payoffs. In: Saraswat, M., Sharma, H., Balachandran, K., Kim, J.H., Bansal, J.C. (eds) Congress on Intelligent Systems. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 111. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9113-3_56

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics