Abstract
The worldwide awareness of the environment urged the search for new composites based on bio fibres. As a result, the focus shifted back to natural fibres, which are biodegradable and typically less expensive than synthetic fibres.Besides, there exists a huge amount of agricultural waste suitable to be used as bio fibre composite materials. Such composites find a wide application, for instance in the automotive industry, structural components, panels, noise control, acoustic wall, agro-fibres biocomposites, wind turbine blades, and many more. Synthetic polymers or eco-friendly polymers, such as poly(glycolic acid), poly(lactic acid), and their copolymers—poly(lactic-co-glycolide) or poly(l-lactic acid), polydioxanone, and poly(l-lactic acid), can be used to strengthen these fibres (caprolactone).The choice of both components’ biodegradable in the bio-composites becomes crucial from the environmental perspective. This chapter covers a wide range of topics, including data on fibre/polymer composites and/or bio-composites, as well as the design of fibre composites. Also, this chapter reviews the natural fibre/reinforced polymers (NFRPs) degradability.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The bioeconomy is defined as the activity related to the design of biodegradable material using biological resources materials and it has been adopted widely in USA, EU, and Canada [1]. Bioeconomy is needed for the low carbon economy worldwide. The current bioeconomy market has been estimated at € 2.4 billion [2]. Biocomposites are used in numerous industries to produce variety of items, such as construction materials, sporting goods, and consumer electronics. The advantage of the biodegradable composite may be summarized as [3,4,5,6,7]:
-
using renewable biodegradable sources,
-
low energy consumption,
-
cheaper production composite,
-
reasonable specific strength and specific elastic modulus,
-
availability in many countries across the globe,
-
biodegradable product recycling is possible,
-
reuse of agricultural waste,
-
recycle natural fibre products.
Many countries have instituted laws to promote recycling and turned out into green products [3] in several applications such as various civil engineering locations including roofing and bridges, thin sheets, shingles, roof tiles, prefabricated shapes, panels, curtain walls, precast elements. Cement bonded wood fibre formed from wood fibres in cement matrix is used for the manufacturing of panel sheet bricks as thermal isolators [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Table 1 gives some products of fibre/polymer composites. The global natural fibre composites market size, valued at US$, will reach about 8 billion [17, 18]. The fibres considered are wood, cotton, flax, hemp. Wood composites are the most popular, followed by cotton, flax, and kenaf fibre. The fibres used may be in the form of loose fibres, granulated natural fibres, natural fibres bundles, woven fabric, nonwoven fabric, and other forms of fibrous assembly. The natural fibre/polymer composite (NFPC) that can be made from fibres in different forms, yarns, woven or nonwoven, knitted, braided fabrics, is used as reinforcing to form the three-dimensional structure of the composite. The matrix is a polymer that gives the final rigid form of the composite and protects fibres from the surrounding environment. The purpose of the matrix is to keep the fibrous structure in final form through adhere the fibres together and redistribute the applied stress on the fibrous structure so that the applied stress is supported by all fibres in the composite cross-section [5, 19, 20]. Furthermore, a large amount of agricultural waste can be used to make acceptable biodegradable composites [3, 18]. For example, agricultural waste from wheat and rice straw amounts to roughly 710 million metric tonnes and 670 million tonnes, respectively, per year [3, 24,25,26,27].
Agriculture and forestry produce 11.9 billion tonnes of dry matter each year, with agriculture producing 61% and forestry producing 39% [28,29,30,31,32,33]. This is besides the recycled waste of the textile garment (In USA 16.9 million tons, 11.15 million tons were landfills). According to Nova-Institute [34, 35], demand for bio-composite board materials would increase at an ascending rate. Figure 1 demonstrates the approximate percentage of the waste extracting during the life cycle of cotton fibres, which indicates most of the fibres will be landfilled.
2 Biodegradable Composite
The principle of the circular economy has gained great attention in the last decades, and environmental protection changes the scenarios of the material used for the formation of the different parts constructions, replacing the metal materials with composite materials, and further progress to use biodegradable composites. Replacing manmade fibre decreases the environmental impact of composite materials. The BioSource materials and biodegradable polymers as an alternative to traditional synthetic polymers will result in the biodegradable composite. The choice of both matrix and fibres being biodegradable results in biocomposites.
2.1 Biocomposite Reinforcements
The composite may be constructed in various shapes from the different types of fibres, either in 2-D or 3-D structures.
-
Fibre-reinforced polymer
(short or continuous filament),
-
Yarns reinforced polymer
(spun or multifilament),
-
2-D fabric reinforced polymer
(woven or nonwoven fabrics),
-
3-D fabric reinforced polymer,
-
Particle reinforced polymer
(whisker, microparticles, or shopped fibres).
The construction of biocomposites can be classified depending on the shape of the material and the layout in the composite as well as the number of layers, single layer, or multi-layer, and finally, the orientation of the fibres in the different layers, Fig. 2.
3 Biodegradable Natural Fibrous Materials
Biodegradable composite is the combination of the biodegradability of the natural fibrous materials when combined with biodegradable polymers or natural resins to form a composite material.Several species of plants can produce fibres from its different parts, for instance from the stem: Jute, Flax, Ramie, Kenaf, leaves; from palm: Sisal, Banana, Abaca, or Cotton. Textile reinforcement for composites totalled $4.3 billion in 2018, with an annual average of 3.3% [5, 36]. Natural fibres are assortedas:
• Cellulosic.
Seed: Cotton, Kapok.
Stem: Flax, Hemp, Jute, Kenaf, Ramie.
Leaf: Manella, Sisal, Banana, Abaca, Agave, Pineapple, Palm.
Fruit: Coir.
Wood: Hardwood, Softwood.
Stalk: Rice, Wheat, Barley, Maize, Oat, Rye.
Grass: Bamboo, Bagasse, Corn, Esparto, Canary, Rice.
• Protein.
Hair: Wool, Alpaca, Camel, Cashmere.
Secreted by the gland: Silk, Spider silk.
Bast fibres are environmentally friendly and can replace glass fibres in forming good biodegradable composites [3]. The world production of the bast fibres according to the different species is given in Fig. 3. Cotton fibres represent the highest production; it reaches 25 million tons while the bast fibres approximately 4 million tons [1, 29]. Bamboo fibres may reach 30 million tons [37].
Figure 4 shows examples of the different sources of natural biodegradable fibres [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54].
3.1 Biodegradable Fibres Properties
Some Biodegradable fibres properties are provided in Table 2.
Table 3 provides the mechanical properties of the most used fibres for composite manufacturing, which vary greatly according to the source of the fibre’s species and where it was cultivated.
The analysis of the different fibres world consumption (not included cotton) is illustrated in Fig. 5 which shows that flax fibres are most consumed.
4 Classification of Biodegradable Polymers
As has been mentioned, the polymer can be a natural material or synthetic, its molecular structure affects physical, mechanical, thermal, and other composite properties [3, 61]. The polymer properties are a result of the mechanical entanglement between chains and forces along with the molecules. Polymer's different properties and its structure define its end-use as well as the biodegradable properties of the biocomposites. The Biofibre composite materialscan be divided into fully biodegradable and partly biodegradable [62], depending on the biodegradability of the matrix that is capable of being decomposed by bacteria or other living organisms. Recently, several biodegradable matrixesare developed [63]. Polylactide acid (PLA), thermoplastic starch, cellulose esters, are examples of the biodegradable polymers from a natural source, while aliphatic polyester, aliphatic–aromatic polyester, polyvinyl alcohol, polyanhydrides, and polyethylene terephthalate are examples of biodegradable polymers from petroleum-based polymers [1]. Partly degradable composites are those using non-degradable polymers, such as polypropylene, polyester, or polyvinyl alcohol.
Natural biodegradable polymers are extracted from biomass or through organically modified organisms [62]. In the last decade, biodegradable polymers, especially PLA, are widely used in the manufacturing of NFPC and other industrial products [64]. Biodegradable polymers are classified:
Agro-polymer: Polysaccharides: starcheswheat, potatoes, maize, lignocellulosic products, wood, straws, chitin, chitosan, gums, alginates.
Bacterial polymers: Semi-synthetic polymers, polyhydroxyalkanoates, Poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate). Microbial polyesters; Poly-3-hydroxyalcanoates, Poly (Hydroxybutyrate-Hydroxyvalerate), Poly (Hydroxybutyrate, Poly- ε-Caprolactones.
Polymers chemically synthesized: Polylactic Acid or Polylactide, Polyglycolic Acid.
In the selection of polymers for each application, some properties are essential for the compatibility of fibre properties, mechanical stresses applied on the composite during services, the suitability for the manufacturing technique of composite formation. The biodegradability of the composite can be tested according to international standards ASTM (D6400 or D6868) for duration of 90 days and up to 180 days, according to standard specifications for compostable plastics. Some other polymer properties are essential for compatibility with the end-use to fulfill matrix performance under various loading conditions, the manufacturing process requirements, and the life cycle analysis of the product.
The polymers can be either natural or synthetic, such as [3, 64]:
Natural
1. Polysaccharides
-
Starch
-
Cellulose
-
Chitin
-
Pullulan
-
Levan
-
Konjac
2. Proteins
-
Protein from grains
-
Collagen/gelatin
-
Casein, albumin, fibrogen, silks, elastin
3. Polyesters
-
Polyhydroxyalkanoates, copolymers
4. Other Polymers
-
Lignin
-
Shellac
-
Natural rubber
Synthetic
1. Poly(amides).
2. Poly(anhydrides).
3. Poly(amide-enamines).
4. Poly(vinyl alcohol).
5. Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol).
6. Poly(vinyl acetate).
7. Polyesters.
-
Poly(glycolic acid)
-
Poly(lactic acid)
-
Poly(caprolactone)
-
Poly(orho esters)
8. Poly(ethylene oxide).
9. Poly(urethanes).
10. Poly(phosphazines).
11. Poly(acrylates).
A biodegradable polymer’s chemical structure is given in Fig. 6. The bio-composites components can consist of biofibres and biopolymers.
5 Biocomposites
The biocomposites consist of two biodegradable components; biofibres and biopolymer as illustrated in Fig. 7.
Several combinations of fibres and polymers can be used for the manufacturing of the biocomposites as illustrated in Fig. 8. The choice of its components differsaccording to the composite end-use.
Fiber type, fiber volume fraction, water content, and matrix specifications determine the composite properties. The strength and modulus increase after a certain fiber volume fraction valueminimum,about 30% [3, 67,68,69,70]. Figure 8 shows some combinations of the biocomposites components.
Application of cellulose nanofibers increasesconsiderably on the account oftheirmechanical and degradability parameters [71].
6 Polymer Properties
The designer should be acquainted with the followingpolymer properties to assist in the selection of the suitable matrix for a certain application:
-
1.
Intrinsic viscosity measurement
-
2.
Density measurement
-
3.
Chemical family
-
4.
Tensile properties
-
5.
Flexural strength
-
6.
Thermal—mechanical strength
-
7.
Compression
-
8.
Creep properties
-
9.
Polymer physical properties
-
10.
Identification of polymer additives
-
11.
Adhesive properties
-
12.
Aging testing for plastics and polymers
-
13.
Chemical resistance testing
-
14.
Environmental testing
-
15.
Ballistic properties
-
16.
Chromatography analysis of polymers
-
17.
Mechanical properties of polymers
-
18.
Mold shrinkage determination
6.1 Polymer Testing Methods
The polymers with different properties, such as the length of the polymer chain and chain structure, are used to form the matrix. There are thermoset and thermoplastic polymers [1]. When the thermoplastic polymer is heated, the de-bonding between chains occurs and the viscosity of the polymer increases, on the contrary to thermoset polymers—on heating of the polymer no movement between the molecules. The International standards used for polymer tests are given in Table 4.
7 Biodegradation
Biodegradation is the ability of materials to break down to get disintegrated under the effect of the action of microorganisms, bacteria, fungi, enzymes, therefore thedeterioration of material structure [72, 73]. Choice of the type of fibre for biocomposites will mainly depend on its properties, suitability for end-use, and cost. The ideal life cycle of the biodegradable composite may be as given in Fig. 9.
As biodegradable materials, they must completely decompose within a short time after disposal—typically a year or less. Biodegradability of some materials is given in Table 5, which indicates that the biodegradable time of material depends on the surrounding media, and it may vary between few weeks to several years.
In some cases, such as in the case of nylon fabric, it needs 30–40 years for biodegradation time. Biodegradability processes pass through two phases [76].
-
1.
Polymer undergoes significant weight loss, reduction in molecular weight, and fragmentation of soluble low molecular weight compounds.
-
2.
Low molecular weight compounds degraded into CO2, water, and cell biomass (in aerobic conditions), and CH4, CO2, and cell biomass (in anaerobic conditions).
Biodegradability testing may be either aerobic (with oxygen available) or anaerobic (no oxygen available). The following equations indicate these two processes, where Cpolymer represents either a polymer or a fragment that is considered to be composed only of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen [77].
• Aerobic biodegradation.
Cpolymer + O2CO2 + H2O + Cresidue + Cbiomass + Salts.
• Anaerobic biodegradation.
Cpolymer CO2 + CH4+ H2O + Cresidue + Cbiomass + Salts.
The biodegradation process is accomplished when the polymer is completely transformed into gaseous products and salts.
It was revealed that the biodegradability of the material depends on the microbial effect and is influenced by the availability of oxygen, temperature, and the availability of water in the surrounding environment. The aerobic degradation in the presence of air will convert into CO2 water and biomass. While in the absence of air it will be converted into CH4, CO2, traces of H2and H2S, and cell biomass [78, 79]. The degradation of the polymer differs according to its chemical structure. The CO2 production is accelerating at the beginning of the test till it reaches a plateau level as shown in Fig. 9. The time taken to reach the fixedvalueof CO2 development in the test was about 75–90 days [80]. Polymer with a high melting point is not expected to disintegrate. Factors, affecting microbial degradation, are moisture, potential hydrogen pH value, temperature [81, 82]. Table 6 gives the types of bacteria and enzymes used in the degradation of the different polymers [81].
8 Natural Fibre Biodegradations
The biodegradation of a material takes place in three steps: degradation, change in the properties of the material, digest of the material.The degradation rate of cellulose material not only depends on the presence of microorganisms and the availability of oxygen [76] but also the physical properties of natural fibres that, in its turn, are mainly determined by the chemical and physical composition. Growth of microorganisms is used in decomposition of substrate depends on several factors [83],and the addition the enzymes results in damaging the structure of the fibres. Biodegradation percentage is evaluated using the following expression:
= (mg of CO2produced/mg of CO2 theoretical) × 100
Figure 10 shows the percentage of degradation as a function of time. The loss in weight of the sample starts at a high rate and slows down till it reaches a platform after 100 days.
In the case of the natural fibre (cotton, flax, jute, ramie) or regenerated fibres (viscose rayon, cellulose acetate), the fibre degradability depends on its internal structure, the degree of crystallinity, the cellulose percentage, and the fibre internal structure. The high crystallinity is the degradation rate [84]. Figure 11 shows the percentage of degradation of some fibres after 40 days [72].
Soil test, according to the ISO 11721- 1:2001 and ISO 11721:2003 standard] [85] for biodegradation of cellulosic fabric requires three months.It was revealed that jute and flax are more biodegraded than cotton. The weight loss of the sample after a degradation time of 3 months is shown in Table 7.
It was found that the degradation of the fibres starts at the surface and proceeds inside the fibre structure. The highly crystalline fibre structure will slow down its degradation [86].
9 Degradation of Biocomposites
The composite biodegradation depends on both fibre and polymer biodegradation. With the addition of natural fibre to the biodegradable polymer, the polymer properties and biodegradability of the resulting composites can be changed in comparison to the base polymer [76]. Crystalline structures of the polymer are responsible for the slow degradation of polymers. For example, use polypropylene as a matrix, the composite percent of degradation reaches 5% of that of natural fibre [80].From the experimental results of biodegradability, when using Polylactic acid (PLA) as a matrix for flax and rice husk, the addition of natural fibres slightly improves the biodegradability of Polylactic acid. Again, the use of Kenaf/Polylactic acid composite has a more significant effect on the biodegradation rate than in the case of rice husk/Polylactic acid composite [87]. Polymer biodegradability, standardized testing procedures may be carried out according to (ISO)or (ASTM) standards [88, 89].
Biodegradable composites offer great potential for achieving green, high-performance composites. However, PLA is degraded at a slow rate, ultimately staying at 33% at the end of the 100-day degradation [90, 91].
10 Methods for Determination of Biodegradation
The biocomposites have undergone remarkable improvements to be used for high-performance applications [76].Different standard methods have been applied to evaluate biodegradability as given in Table 8.
Test products are assessed for key chemical properties relating to the material’s carbon content and then added to the method test chambers for analysis. Standards are measuring carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions or oxygen consumption under environmentally controlled conditions [92,93,94,95]. Biodegradation Testing for Compostable Solids includes ASTM D6400, ISO 16929, and ISO 14855. ASTM D6400 is most often used for composite and also as recommended composability method. The ISO standard organization has several other standards such as ISO 14855 and ISO 17556:2003.
11 Testing Methods for Natural Fibre/polymer Biocomposites Materials
11.1 Composite Materials Testing Methods
Generally, the mechanical testing of composite material includes:
-
1.
Tensile strength
-
2.
Compression
-
3.
Flexure/bend strength
-
4.
Puncture strength
-
5.
Tear resistance
-
6.
Peel strength
-
7.
Shear strength
-
8.
Delamination strength
-
9.
Bond strength
-
10.
Adhesion strength
-
11.
Creep and stress relaxation
-
12.
Crush resistance
-
13.
Impact strength
12 Torsion
Depending on the application of the polymer and the composite end-use, the test should be chosen. Table 9 gives some basic tests and testing methods for characterization of composite properties that depend on the end-use to provide the required knowledge for a designer of a composite material.
13 Examples of Biofibre Composites Applications
Biocomposites have several new applications. Table 10 gives some examples of the biocomposites application.
In the straw fibre biocomposites different matrices can be used for example, with wheat straw it can be Wheat Gluten, Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-Valerate), Natural Rubber, Polypropylene; for Wheat husks, Poly(Lactic Acid);for Rice husk, Poly(3hydroxybutyrate) and Poly(Lactic Acid);for Cornstalk, Natural Rubber, Poly(Lactic Acid); and for Corn husks, Polyethylene, Polypropylene [106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114].
13.1 Processing Methods of Biocomposites
The following is a list of technologies or approaches having implications for the increased use of natural fibres, Table 11. Film stacking, injection molding, and compression molding are the most widely used manufacturing methods.
Several factors affect biocomposites performance, such as processing method, fibre properties, fibre laying, fibre moisture, natural fibre assembly form (loose fibre, yarns, woven, nonwoven, knitted fabric), composite structure (single laminate, multi-laminate), porosity, type of polymer and its properties. In the present time, biopolymers have been found an expanding application in the processing of biocomposites. The chemical structure of the biodegradable polymers is given in Table 12.
In the literature, several applications using biodegradable fibres or waste using different types of biopolymers were intensively investigated [3, 11]. Table 13 gives some application of biocomposites constitutes.
A new trend has arisen where two or more polymers are being selected as matrices for composite applications to get better results over individual biopolymers ones, such as PBAT/PBS blends [125].
Abbreviations
- PLA:
-
Poly(lactic acid),
- PHAs:
-
Polyhydroxyalkanoates,
- PHB:
-
Polyhydroxybutyrate,
- PHBV:
-
Poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate),
- PCL:
-
Polycaprolactone,
- PBAT:
-
Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate),
- PBS:
-
Poly(butylene succinate),
- PE:
-
Polyethylene,
- PP:
-
Polypropylene,
- PET:
-
Poly(ethylene terephthalate),
- PEG:
-
Poly(ethylene glycol),
- NR:
-
Natural rubber,
- LCP:
-
Liquid crystal polymer,
- LDPE:
-
Low density polyethylene,
- LLDPE:
-
Linear low density polyethylene,
- HDPE:
-
High density polyethylene,
- HMWHDPE:
-
High molecular weight high density polyethylene,
- MBS:
-
Methacrylate-butadiene-styrene terpolymer,
- PVC:
-
Polyvinyl chloride,
- TPU:
-
Thermoplastic polyurethane
References
Scarlat N et al (2015) The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy. Policies and facts, Environmental Development 15:3–34
Parisi C, Ronzon T (2016) (Online), A global view of bio-based industries: benchmarking and monitoring their economic importance and future developments. EUR 28376 EN; 2016; doi:https://doi.org/10.2788/153649, (Accessed May 5, 2021)
El Messiry M (2016) Natural fibre textile composite engineering. A&P Press Inc., USA
ChandramohanD., Marimuthu K. (2011), A Review on Natural Fibres. IJRRAS 8(2) :194- 206, www.arpapress.com/Volumes/Vol8Issue2/IJRRAS_8_2_09.pdf
Dhal P, Mishra S (2013) Processing and properties of natural fibre-reinforced polymer composite. J Mater 2013:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/297213
Faruk O, Bledzki K, Fink H, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibres. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003
Kapatel P (2019) Investigation of Green Composite: Preparation and Characterization of Alkali-Treated Jute Fabric-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Journal of Natural Fibres 18(4):510–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1636738
Leao A, et al. (2012) Food Agricultural Commodities Team, Unlocking the Commercial Potential of Natural Fibres, publications of FOA
Dammer L, Carus M, Raschka A, Scholz L (2013) Market Developments of and Opportunities for bio based products and chemicals, Final Report, nova-Institute for Ecology and Innovation, reference number 52202: 1–67. https://www.eumonitor.nl/9353000/1/j4nvgs5kjg27kof_j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vjken6y2ivvo/f=/blg338557.pdf
Alimuzzaman S, Gong R (2013) Akonda M (2013) Impact Property of PLA/Flax Nonwoven Biocomposite. Conference Papers in Materials Science 136861:1–6
Pereira P, Rosa M et al (2015) Vegetal fibres in polymeric composites: a review. Polímeros 25(1):9–22
Ticoalu A, Aravinthan T, Cardona F (2010) A review of current development in natural fibre composites for structural and infrastructure applications. Southern Region Engineering Conference 11–12 November 2010, Toowoomba, Australia
Balasubramanian J et al (2015) Experimental Investigation of Natural Fibre Reinforced Concrete in Construction Industry. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 02(01):179–182
Yan L, Chouw N (2015) Sustainable Concrete and Structures with Natural Fibre Reinforcements, eBook, OMICS group. http://www.esciencecentral.org/ebooks/infrastructure-corrosion-durability/sustainable-concrete-and-structures-with-natural-fibre-reinforcements.php.
Chowdhury S, Roy S (2013) Prospects of Low Cost Housing in India. Geomaterials 3(2):60–65
Wolfe R, Gjinolli A (1996) Cement-Bonded Wood Composites as an Engineering Material, The Use of Recycled Wood and Paper in Building Applications. Conference 1996,Madison, Wisconsin, September 1996, USA http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1997/wolfe97a.pdf
Yashas G, Sanjay M, Subrahmanya B, Madhu P et al (2018) Polymer matrix-natural fibre composites: An overview. Cogent Engineering 5(1446667):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1446667
Natural Fibre Composites (NFC) (Online), Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Raw Material, By Matrix, By Technology, By Application, And Segment Forecasts: 2018 – 2024. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/natural-fibre-composites-market (accessed May 6, 2021)
Dunne R, Desai D, Sadiku R, Jayaramudu J (2016) A review of natural fibres, their sustainability and automotive applications. Journal of Reinforced Plastics 35(13):1041–1050
Sen T, Reddy H (2011) Various industrial applications of hemp, kenaf, flax and ramie natural fibres. Int J InnovatManagTech 2:192–198
Desai J, Pandey N (1971) Microbial Degradation of Cellulose Textiles. J Sci Ind Res 30:598–606
Bisanda N (2000) The effect of alkali treatment on the adhesion characteristics of sisal fibres. Appl Compos Mater 7(5–6):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102658602
Huda S, Drzal T, Ray D, Mohanty K, Mishra M (2008) Natural-fibre composites in the automotive sector. In Properties and performance of natural-fibre composites, Ed. Pickering K L: 221–268. Woodhead: Elsevier
Graupner N, Herrmann A, Müssig J (2009) Natural and man-made cellulose fibre-reinforced poly (lactic acid)(PLA) composites: an overview about mechanical characteristics and application areas, Composites Part A. Applied Science and Manufacturing 40(6–7):810–821
El Messiry M, El Deeb R (2016) Analysis of the Wheat Straw/Flax Fibre Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites. J Appl Mech Eng 5:240. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9873.1000240
Yasina M, Bhuttob A, Karimb A (2010) Efficient utilization of rice-wheat straw to produce value added composite products. Int J Chemical and Environmental Engineering 1:136–148
Mantanis E, Nakosb P, Berns J, Rigal L (2000) Urning Agricultural Straw Residues Into Value –Added Composite Products: A New Environmentally Friendly Technology, Conference: Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Environmental Pollution, Aug. 28–31, 2000, Aristotelian University, Thessaloniki, Greece
Popp J, Kov´acs S, Ol´ah J, Div´eki Z, Bal´azs E, (2021) Bioeconomy: Biomass and biomass-based energy supply and demand. New Biotechnol 60:76–84
Dungani R, Karina M, Subyakto M, Sulaeman A, Hermawan D, Hadiyane A (2016) Agricultural waste fibres towards sustainability and advanced utilization: A review. Asian J. Plant Sci. 15:42–55
Islam S, El Messiry M, Sikdar P, Seylar J, Bhat G (2020) Microstructure and performance characteristics of acoustic insulation materials from postconsumer recycled denim fabrics. Ind text J:1–27 https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720940746
Muthu S (2017) Textiles and clothing sustainability: recycled and upcycled textiles and fashion. Springer, Singapore
EPA (2020), (Online), Facts and Fig.s about materials, waste and recycling, www.epa.gov/facts-and-Fig.s-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/textiles-material-specific-data (accessed 26 April, 2020)
Wang Y (2010 )Fibre and textile waste utilization. Waste Biomass Valor 1: 135–143
Aladejana J, Wu Z, Fan M, Xie Y (2020) Key advances in development of straw fibre bio-composite boards: An overview. Mater. Res. Express 7(1):1–19
Piotrowski S, Mand C, Essel R (2015) Global Bioeconomy in the conflict between biomass supply and demand. Ind Biotechnol 11:1–13
Composite world, (online) Natural fibre composites: What’s holding them back? https://www.compositesworld.com/articles/natural-fibre-composites-whats-holding-them-back (accessed May 3, 2021)
Michalina F, Katarzya J, George W (2010) Handbook of Biodegradation, Biodeterioration and Biostabilization. ChemTec Publishing, Toronto
Bamboo garden. [Online] http://www.bamboogarden.com/care.htm (accessed May 6, 2016)
FAONewsroom.[Online] http://www.fao.org/NEWSROOM/EN/news/2006/1000285/index.html (accessed May 6, 2016)
Natural fibres. [Online] http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/ad416e/ad416e06.htm (accessed May 6, 2016)
Crop Science. [Online] http://www.bayercropscience.cl/soluciones/fichacultivo.asp?id=129 (accessed May 6, 2016)
Hemp. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemp (accessed May 6, 2016).
Agave. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agave_fourcroydes(accessed May 6, 2016)
Abaca. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abac%C3%A1 (accessed May 6, 2016)
Yucca faxoniana. [Online] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yucca_faxoniana_2.jpg (accessed May 6, 2016)
Jute. [Online] http://www.bangla-bagan.com/2015/08/13/growing-a-jute-plant-in-the-uk/(accessed May 6, 2016)
Ceiba pentandra. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceiba_pentandra (accessed May 6, 2016)
Hibiscus cannabinus. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenaf (accessed May 6, 2016)
Cannabis sativa. [Online] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Government_Medical_Marijuana_crop._University_of_Mississippi._Oxford.jpg#/media/File:U.S._Government_Medical_Marijuana_crop._University_of_Mississippi._Oxford.jpg(accessed May 6, 2016)
Urticadioica. [Online] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Stinging_nettle_plants.JPG(accessed May 6, 2016)
Elaeisguineensis. [Online] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_oil (accessed May 6, 2016)
Attalea (palm). [Online] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Attalea_funifera_Mart._ex_Spreng._(6709151365).jpg (accessed May 6, 2016)
Pineapple. [Online] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pineapple_fields_in_the_United_States#/media/File:Starr_020630-0021_Ananas_comosus.jpg(accessed May 6, 2016)
Phormium Amazing Red. [Online] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phormium_Amazing_Red_1.jpg#/media/File:Phormium_Amazing_Red_1.jpg (accessed May 6, 2016)
Layth M, Ansari M, Pua G, Jawaid M, Islam M (2015) A Review on Natural Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite and Its Applications. International Journal of Polymer Science 2015. Article ID 243947:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/243947
Van der Zee M, Stoutjesdijk H, Van der Heijden W, De Wit D (1995) Structure-biodegradation relationships of polymeric materials & Effect of degree of oxidation of carbohydrate polymers. Journal of Polymers and the Environment [e-journal] 3(4):235–242, Available through: SpringerLink (Accessed 25 January 2021)
Abba A, Nur Z, Salit M (2013) Review of agro waste plastic composites production. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 1:271–279
Cicala G, Cristaldi G, Recca G, et al. (2010) Composites based on natural fibre fabrics. In: Woven fabric engineering, InTech.https://www.intechopen.com/books/woven-fabric-engineering/composites-based-on-natural-fibre-fabrics
Gupta M (2016) Srivastava R (2016) Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Fibres-Reinforced Polymer Composite: A Review. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 55(6):626–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2015.1098694
Pao C, Yeng C (2019) Properties and characterization of wood plastic composites made from agro-waste materials and post-used expanded polyester foam. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite 32(7):951–966
Polymer Structure (2021), (online ), Iowa State University Center for nondestructive Evaluation NDE-Ed.Org. https://www.nde-ed.org/Physics/Materials/Physical_Chemical/PhaseTransformationTemp.xhtml
(accessed May 3, 2021)
Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H (2013) Biodegradable Polymers, Biodegradation - Life of Science, chapter 6, Ed. Chamy R, Pub. InTech. [Online] 2013. (Accessed March 29, 2021)
Luckachan G, Pillai C (2011) Biodegradable Polymers- A Review on Recent Trends and Emerging Perspectives. J PolymEnviron 19:637–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0317-1
Netravali A (2005) Chapter 9. Biodegradable natural fibrecomposites .Biodegradable and sustainable fibres. Edited by R. S. Blackburn. Published by Woodhead Publishing Limited in association with The Textile Institute Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge CB1 6AH, 2005, England
Masuelli M (2013) Introduction of fibre-reinforced polymers − polymers and composites: concepts, properties and processes, fibre reinforced polymers - the technology applied for concrete repair. Ed. Masuelli, M.A., Pub. InTech, 2013
Bos H, M¨ussig J, Jvan den Oever J, (2006) Mechanical properties of short-flax-fibre reinforced compounds. Compos A 37(10):1591–1604
Bos H (2004) The potential of flax fibers as reinforcement for composite materials. Ph.D. Thesis, TechnischeUniversiteitEindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Garkhail S, Heijenrath R, Peijs T (2000) Mechanical properties of natural-fibre-mat-reinforced thermoplastics based on flax fibres and polypropylene. Appl Compos Mater 7(5–6):351–372
NishinoT, (2004) Natural fiber sources, in Green Composites: Polymer Composites and the Environment. CRC Press, BocaRaton, Fla, USA
Espert A, Vilaplana F, Karlsson S (2004) Comparison of water absorption in natural cellulosic fibres from wood and one-year crops in polypropylene composites and its influence on their mechanical properties. Compos A 35(11):1267–1276
Kalia S et al (2011) Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review. International Journal of Polymer Science 2011:1–35
Marielis C et al (2020) Effect of chemical and morphological structure on biodegradability of fibre, fabric, and other polymeric materials. BioResources 15(4):9786–9833
Albertsson A, Karlsson S (1994) Chemistry and technology of biodegradable polymers. Blackie, Glasgow, pp 7–17
Science learning hub (2018), (online) Measuring biodegradability, Science Learning Hub. Retrieved 2018–09–19 (Accessed March 29, 2021)
Vert M, Hellwich D (1993) (online) Marine Debris Timeline Biodegradation, C-MORE, citing Mote Marine Laboratory, (Accessed March 29, 2021)
Muniyasamy S et al (2013) Biodegradability and Composability of Lignocellulosic. J. Renew. Mater. 1(4):253–272
Van der Zee M (2011) Analytical Methods for Monitoring Biodegradation Processes of Environmentally Degradable Polymers, Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications, First Edition. Edited by Andreas Lendlein, Adam Sisson,© 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2011 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA
Tuomela M et al (2000) Biodegradation of lignin in a compost environment: a review. Biores Technol 72:169–183
Sharma M (2021) Biodegradable Polymers: Materials and their Structures. CRC Press, 2021, USA
Chattopadhyay S, Singh S, Pramanik N et al (2011) Biodegradability Studies on Natural Fibres Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. J Appl Polym Sci 121:2226–2232
Iram D, Riaz R, Iqbal R (2019) Usage of Potential Micro-organisms for Degradation of Plastics. Open J Environ Biol 4(1): 7–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17352/ojeb.000010]
Tokiwa Y, Calabia B, Aiba S (2009) Biodegradability of Plastics. Int J Mol Sci 10(9):3722–3742
Ferdes M, Dinca M, Moiceanu G, Bianca S, Zabava G (2020) Microorganisms and Enzymes Used in the Biological Pretreatment of the Substrate to Enhance Biogas Production: A Review Sustainability 12:7205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177205
Pantani R, Sorrentino A (2013) Influence of crystallinity on the biodegradation rate of injection-mouldedpoly(lactic acid) samples in controlled composting conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 98(5):1089–1096
Arshad K, Mujahid M (2011) Biodegradation of Textile Materials. Master Thesis for the Master in Textile Technology, School of Engineering University of Boras, Sweden
Zambrano, et al (2020) Biodegradability fibre/fabric. BioResources 15(4):9786–9833
Yussuf A, Massoumi I, Hassan A (2010) Comparison of Polylactic Acid/Kenaf and Polylactic Acid/Rise Husk Composites: The Influence of the Natural Fibres on the Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradability Properties. J PolymEnviron 18:422–429
ISO 17088:2021.Specification of compostable plastics. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:17088:ed-3:v1:en
ASTM D6400–12 (2012) Standard specification for labeling of plastics designed to be aerobically composted in municipal or industrial facilities. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/13327302/ASTM%20D6400
Xie L et al (2014) Toward faster degradation for natural fibre reinforced poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by enhancing the hydrolysis-induced surface erosion. J PolymRes 21:357–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-014-0357-z
Chauhan A, Chauhan P (2013) Natural Fibres and Biopolymer. J Chem Eng Process Technol S6:1–4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.S6-001
Castellani F, Esposito A, Stanzione V, Altieri R (2016) Measuring the Biodegradability of Plastic Polymers in Olive-Mill Waste Compost with an Experimental Apparatus. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2016. Article ID 6909283:1–7
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Specification for compostable plastics, ISO 17088:2012, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland, 2012
European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Packaging— requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation—test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging,” CEN EN 13432:2000, 2000.
Emirates Authority for Standardization & Metrology (ESMA). Standard & Specification for Oxo-biodegradation of Plastic bags and other disposable plastic objects. http://www.puntofocal.gob.ar/notific_otros_miembros/are26_t.pdf
Križan P, Beniak J, Matúš M, Šooš L, Kolláth L (2017) Research of plastic and wood raw wastes recovery. Adv Mater Lett 8(10):983–986
Smith P, Wolcott M (2006) Opportunities for wood/natural fibre plastic composites in residential and industrial applications. Forest Prod. J. 56(3):4–11
Preetesh S (2020) A Study on the Utilization of the Biomass to Produce Biodegradable Board. Journal of critical reviews 7(09):3158–3166
Panthapulakkal S, Sain M (2015) The use of wheat straw fibres as reinforcements in composites Biofibre Reinforcements in Composite Materials. Ed. Faruk O and Sain M (Woodhead Publishing)
Chen R, Salleh M et al (2015) Biocomposites based on rice husk flour and recycled polymer blend: effects of interfacial modification and high fibre loading. BioResources 10:6872–6885
Battegazzore D, Bocchini S, Alongi J, Frache A (2014) Rice husk as bio-source of silica: preparation and characterization of PLA–silica bio-composites RSC Adv. 4:54703–54712
Hýsek Š, Podlena M, Bartsch H, Wenderdel C, Böhm M (2018) Effect of wheat husk surface pre-treatment on the properties of huskbased composite materials. Ind Crops Prod 125:105–133
Cobo P, de Espinosa FM (2013) Proposal of cheap microperforated panel absorbers manufactured by infiltration. Appl Acoust 74:1069–1075
Jayamani E, Hamdan S, Rahman M, Bakri M (2015) Study of sound absorption coefficients and characterization of rice straw stem fibres reinforced polypropylene composites. BioResources 10:3378–3392
Montaño-Leyva B, da Silva GGD, Gastaldi E, Torres-Chávez P, Gontard N, Angellier-Coussy H (2013) Products, biocomposites from wheat proteins and fibres: structure/mechanical properties relationships. Ind Crops Prod 43:545–555
Berthet M, Gontard N, Angellier-Coussy H (2015) Technology, Impact of fibre moisture content on the structure/mechanical properties relationships of PHBV/wheat straw fibresbiocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 117:386–391
Masłowski M, Miedzianowska J, Strzelec K (2017) Natural rubber biocomposites containing corn, barley and wheat straw. Polym Test 63:84–91
Jagadeesh D, Sudhakara P, Lee D, Kim H, Kim B, Song J (2013) Mechanical properties of corn husk flour/PP bio-composites. Green composites 26:213–217
Tran T, Bénézet J, Bergeret A (2014) Rice and Einkorn wheat husks reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biocomposites: effects of alkaline and silane surface treatments of husks. Ind Crops Prod 58:111–124
Sánchez-Safont E, Aldureid A, Lagarón J, Gámez-Pérez J, Cabedo L (2018) Biocomposites of different lignocellulosic wastes for sustainable food packaging applications. Compos B Eng 145:215–225
Masłowski M, Miedzianowska J, StrzelecK(2019) Natural Rubber Composites Filled with Crop Residues as an Alternative to Vulcanizates with Common Fillers, Polymers. 11, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11060972
Luo H, Zhang C, Xiong G, Wan Y (2016) Effects of alkali and alkali/silane treatments of corn fibres on mechanical and thermal properties of its composites with polylactic acid. Polym Compos 37:3499–3507
Trigui A, Karkri M, Pena L, Boudaya C, Candau Y, Bouffi S, Vilaseca F (2013) Thermal and mechanical properties of maize fibres– high density polyethylene biocomposites. J Compos Mater 47:1387–1397
Wang D, Xuan L, Han G, Wong A, Wang Q, Cheng W (2020) Preparation and characterization of foamed wheat straw fibre/polypropylene composites based on modified nano-TiO2 particles. Composites Part A. Applied Science and Manufacturing 128, 105674
Brouwer W (2009) Natural fibre composites in structural components: alternative applications for sisal. FAO, Economic and Social Development Department (online) http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/y1873e/y1873e02.htm#TopOfPage (accessed Feb 10, 2015)
Bio-base news. (Online) http://news.bio-based.eu/biocomposites/ (accessed June 28, 2015)
Mano B, Araújo JR, Spinacé M, De Paoli M (2010) Polyolefin composites with curauafibres: effect of the processing conditions on mechanical properties, morphology and fibres dimensions. Compos Sci Technol 70(1):29–35
John M, Anandjiwala R (2009) Chemical modification of flax reinforced polypropylene composites. Composites Part A. Applied Science and Manufacturing 40(4):442–448
Yan Z, Wang H, Lau K, Pather S, Zhang JC, Lin G, Ding Y (2013) Reinforcement of polypropylene with hemp fibres. Compos B Eng 46:221–226
Acha B, Reboredo M, Marcovich N (2007) Creep and dynamic mechanical behavior of PP–jute composites: effect of the interfacial adhesion. Composites Part A. Applied Science and Manufacturing 38(6), 1507–1516
Kaewkuk S, Sutapun W, Jarukumjorn K (2013) Effects of interfacial modification and fibre content on physical properties of sisal fibre/polypropylene composites. Compos B Eng 45(1):544–549
Cerqueira E, Baptista C, Mulinari D (2011) Mechanical behaviour of polypropylene reinforced sugarcane bagasse fibres composites. Procedia Engineering 10:2046–2051
Guimarães J, Wypych F, Saul C, Ramos L, Satynarayana K (2010) Studies of the processing and characterization of corn starch and its composites with banana and sugarcane fibres from Brazil. Carbohyd Polym 80(1):130–138
Kim J T, Netravali A (2010) Mercerization of sisal fibres: effect of tension on mechanical properties of sisal fibre and fibre-reinforced composites. Composites Part A. Applied Science and Manufacturing 41(9):1245–1252
Muthuraja R, Misraa M, Mohanty A(2015) Binary blends of poly(butylene adipate-coterephthalate) and poly(butylene succinate): A new matrix for biocomposites applications. AIP Conference Proceedings 1664, 150009; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918505
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
EL Messiry, M. (2022). Biodegradable Fibers, Polymers, Composites and Its Biodegradability, Processing and Testing Methods. In: Palanikumar, K., Thiagarajan, R., Latha, B. (eds) Bio-Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials. Composites Science and Technology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8899-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8899-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8898-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8899-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)