Skip to main content

Underwater Acoustic Image Processing for Detection of Marine Debris

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 836))

  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

Underwater acoustic images obtained from acoustic imaging equipment, either stand-alone or on-board autonomous underwater vehicles, consist of noise, mainly in multiplicative form. Enhancing and restoring acoustic images is a crucial step towards computer vision applications that require high-quality data for segmentation, detection, classification and recognition in underwater images. This paper presents a technical study of image enhancement and restoration techniques that are used to pre-process acoustic images and their application in underwater environment. The experimental results prove that VisuShrink, a wavelet transformation technique, and Unsharp Masking, a linear image processing technique, outperform the other methods at restoring and enhancing underwater acoustic images of marine debris. The efficiency of the proposed techniques is calculated and compared using Image Quality Assessment metric, the Peak Signal -to -Noise- Ratio (PSNR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karabchevsky S, Kahana D, Ben-Harush O, Guterman H (2011) FPGA-based adaptive speckle suppression filter for underwater imaging sonar. IEEE J Ocean Eng 36. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2011.2157729

  2. Grelowska G, Kozaczka E (2014) Underwater acoustic imaging of the sea. Archive Acous 39:439–452

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valdenegro Toro M (2019) Deep neural networks for marine debris detection in sonar images. arXiv:1905.05241

  4. Priyadharsini R, Sharmila TS, Rajendran V (2015) Underwater acoustic image enhancement using wavelet and K-L transform. In: 2015 International conference on applied and theoretical computing and communication technology (iCATccT), Davangere .https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATCCT.2015.7456948.

  5. Stateczny A, Kazimierski W, Kulpa K (2020) Radar and sonar imaging and processing. Remote Sens 12:1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111811

  6. Hamouda A, Soliman K, El-Gharabawy MN (2019) Comparative study between acoustic signals and images for detecting seabed features. Egypt J Aquat Res 45(2)

    Google Scholar 

  7. blueprint subsea (2017) Oculus m-series user manual (English). Oculus multibeam sonar support

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang CC (2006) Image enhancement by modified contrast-stretching manipulation. Opt Laser Technol 38(3)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sankur B, Sezgin M (2001) Image thresholding techniques: a survey over categories. Pattern Recogn 34:1573–1583

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dorothy R, Joany RM, Rathish RJ, Prabha SS, Rajendran S, Joseph St (2015) Image enhancement by Histogram equalization. Int J Nano Corrosion Sci Eng 2:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee J, Pant SR, Lee H (2015) An adaptive histogram equalization based local technique for contrast preserving image enhancement. Int J Fuzzy Logic Intell Syst 15:35–44. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2015.15.1.35

  12. Isar A, Firoiu I, Nafornita C, Moga S (2011). Sonar Images Denoising. https://doi.org/10.5772/19190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isar A, Moga S, Lurton X (2005) A statistical analysis of the 2D discrete wavelet transform

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swarnalatha S, Satyanarayana P, Shoban Babu B (2015) Image denoising techniques using dual tree complex and hyperanalytic wavelet transform with bi-shrink filter. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrument Eng 4(4)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hazra TH, Mazumder A, Maity D (2015) A new perspective of wavelet based image denoising using different wavelet thresholding 5:6–391. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20161212.

  16. Starck JL, Candès EJ, Donoho DL (2002) The curvelet transform for image denoising, IEEE Trans Image Process 11(6)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pang C, Au OC, Dai J, Yang W, Zou F (2009) A fast NL-Means method in image denoising based on the similarity of spatially sampled pixels:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2009.5293567.

  18. Zhang M (2009) Bilateral filter in image processing. LSU Master's Theses:1912

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akl A, Tabbara K, Yaacoub C (2012) Edge-based suboptimal kuan filtering for speckle noise reduction. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEngTechnol.2012.6396152

  20. Zhu J, Wen J, Zhang Y (2013) A new algorithm for SAR image despeckling using an enhanced Lee filter and median filter,6th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP). Hangzhou. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP.2013.6743991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun XX, Qu W (2014) Comparison between mean filter and median filter algorithm in image denoising field. Appl Mech Mater, 644–650, 4112–4116. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.644-650.4112

  22. Leavline EJ, Singh DAA (2013) Salt and pepper noise detection and removal in gray scale images: an experimental analysis. Int J Signal Process Image Process Pattern Recogn 6:343–352. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijsip.2013.6.5.30

  23. Archana JN (2016) A review on the image sharpening algorithms using unsharp masking. IJESC 6:8729–8733

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valdenegro-Toro M (2019) Learning objectness from sonar images for class-independent object detection. arXiv:1907.00734v1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Naik, V.V., Ansari, S. (2022). Underwater Acoustic Image Processing for Detection of Marine Debris. In: Sanyal, G., Travieso-González, C.M., Awasthi, S., Pinto, C.M.A., Purushothama, B.R. (eds) International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 836. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8542-2_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics