Abstract
There have been many reports describing various surgical approaches for pathologies in the foramen or extra-foramen areas. Among these approaches, Watkins introduced the paraspinal approach for posterior–lateral fusion in 1953, which was later modified and established by Wiltse and Spancer. This approach has definitely improved the treatment outcomes. The paraspinal approach has improved the surgical results because of the reduced amount of facet resection, less retraction of the paraspinal muscles, appropriate handling of the exiting nerve root, and adequate decompression of the dorsal root ganglion.
As the value of minimally invasive spinal surgery becomes more and more acknowledged and accepted by spine surgeons, the application of paraspinal approach surgery using the endoscope is rapidly expanding. The most important advantage of the endoscopic paraspinal approach is direct visualization of the nerve root and its surrounding structures in a minimally invasive way. However, compared to the more frequently used posterior approach, fewer spine surgeons are familiar with the paraspinal approach. Therefore, the goal of this chapter is to describe the anatomical and technical details to help overcome the learning curve.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Minimally invasive spine surgery
- Foraminal stenosis
- Far-lateral herniated disc
- Unilateral biportal endoscopy
- Paraspinal approach
1 Introduction
Degenerative change of the vertebral disc can induce hypertrophy of the facet joints, thickening of the ligament flavum, and resultant narrowing of the neural foramen. These degenerative changes lead to symptomatic lumbosacral radiculopathy and account for approximately about 10% of lumbar degenerative diseases that required surgical intervention [1, 2].
Before the concept of minimally invasive spine surgery was introduced, lumbar fusion surgery was probably the one and only surgical solution for lumbar foraminal lesions. However, as the endoscopic spine surgical techniques have matured, many lumbar foraminal pathologies can be well treated by just simple decompression [3,4,5].
In particular, the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique allows for minimally invasive surgical access, has no restrictions on the use of surgical instruments, and has a relatively short learning curve by providing a more familiar surgical anatomy based on the classic Wiltse approach.
Furthermore, the endoscopic lens, the so-called “operative eye,” can be advanced very close to the lesion, and capture clear and magnified video images of the lesion and its surrounding structures. Visualization of the deep neural structures and pathologies would no longer be limited by the anatomical structures [6].
In this chapter, we provide a step-by-step description of the surgical procedure of the paraspinal approach with the UBE technique using video and pictures. The paraspinal approach for L5–S1 is described separately, because compared to the other levels, it has special anatomical considerations.
2 Indications and Contraindications
The surgical indications and contraindications are the same as the microscopic lumbar foraminotomy via Wiltse approach [7].
2.1 Indications
-
1.
Chronic mono-radiculopathy resistant to conservative treatment.
-
2.
Para-sagittal and axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) showing foraminal or extra-foraminal lesions. Stenosis, herniated disc, or hypertrophic osteophyte, etc.
2.2 Contraindications
-
1.
Definite segmental instability.
-
2.
Degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis over grade 1.
3 Anesthesia and Position
The surgery can be performed under general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia, depending on the estimated surgical time, and the patient’s conditions. The patient is placed in a prone position on the radiolucent Wilson frame with mild flexion of the lumbar spine and proper padding at the patient’s axilla and under his/her knees. To avoid soaking and hypothermia of the patient, the draping must be waterproof (Fig. 9.1).
4 Surgical Steps
4.1 [L1–5 Level]
4.1.1 Skin Marking and Incision
Under the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy, two skin incisions are made to form the viewing and working portals. The length of the skin incision is about 0.5 cm, and each skin incision is located above the ipsilateral lateral margin of the transverse processes. The interval between the two portals is about 2 cm to 2.5 cm (Fig. 9.2a).
The docking point of the endoscope and the instrument is the isthmus. The distance of the skin incisions away from the midline can be determined preoperatively on the MRI to make the trajectory of 30 degrees to 40 degrees (Fig. 9.2b–d). This angle is the most ideal approach angle, because foraminotomy can be done through undercutting with the lowest risk of an iatrogenic isthmic fracture. In patients with severe disc space narrowing, it is almost impossible to identify the isthmus. In such cases, the alternative docking point will be the tip of the superior articular process (SAP).
The fascia is opened perpendicularly to the skin incision with a No.15 blade for better saline outflow. Serial dilators are used to separate the back muscle and create the initial operative space. After inserting the cannula, a 0° endoscope is inserted through the scope portal. The authors prefer to use a natural gravity drainage system (about 70 cm high above the operation table) for saline irrigation. But if the use of the saline pumping system is preferred, the recommended hydrostatic pressure is about 30 mmHg. This pressure setting is safe, without risks of increasing the intracranial pressure. After triangulation with the endoscope and instrument on the isthmus or the tip of the SAP, the small bleeding can be effectively controlled using the radiofrequency (RF) wand.
4.1.2 Foraminotomy/Discectomy (Video 9.1)
To confirm the surgical anatomy, the RF wand and automated shaver are used to clear the soft tissue remnants overlying the lamina and the base of the transverse process. The surgical landmarks, including the lateral aspect of the isthmus, inferior border of the upper transverse process, and lateral aspect of the SAP, should be clearly identified before proceeding to the next step (Fig. 9.3).
A diamond spherical bur is used to drill the lamina. Drilling starts at the lateral border of the isthmus and continues in an under-inside direction. Then the lateral portion of the ligament flavum and the inferior aspect of the pedicle at the base of the transverse process can be exposed (Fig. 9.4a).
The ligament flavum around the foramen is removed using a curette and Kerrison’s punches (Fig. 9.4b). After completion of the flavectomy, the exiting nerve root with its overlying adipose tissue can be exposed (Fig. 9.4c).
If more extent of foraminal decompression is indicated, the cranial tip of the SAP can be resected from the hypertrophic facet joint using a chisel or the diamond bur. If the offending pathology is a lumbar disc herniation, additional discectomy can now be performed, usually from the axilla area of the exiting root (Fig. 9.4d).
After adequate decompression of the exiting root is confirmed, epidural bleeding can be controlled by coagulation with RF wands. A drain is inserted, and after removal of the instruments and the endoscope, the surgical wounds are closed with a skin stapler. The suction drain is usually kept for 24 h after the surgery, until spontaneous bleeding is controlled.
4.2 [L5–S1 Level]
The paraspinal approach at the L5–S1 level has a very limited surgical field. In addition, there are some special and different anatomical features from other lumbar levels. These may include prominent iliac crest, oblique pedicles, and more coronally oriented facet joints. Therefore, it is difficult to create a surgical trajectory to the medial direction of the L5 isthmus.
4.2.1 Skin Marking and Incision
Under the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy, two skin incisions are made to form the viewing and working portals. The length of the skin incision is about 0.5 cm, and each skin incision is located above the ipsilateral lateral margin of the L5 transverse process and sacral alar. The interval between the two portals is about 2 cm (Fig. 9.5a).
Different from other lumbar levels, the isthmus of L5 is very narrow, and the docking point of the endoscope and the instrument is determined by the osseous triangle consisting of the lateral border of the SAP, the sacral alar, and the base of the L5 transverse process (Fig. 9.5b, c). Exposing the boundary of this osseous triangle makes it easier to understand the complex anatomic structures around the L5–S foramen. The recommended trajectory angle is the same as for the other lumbar levels.
4.2.2 Foraminotomy/Discectomy (Video 9.2)
To confirm the surgical anatomy, the RF wand and automated shaver are used to clear the soft tissue remnants overlying the osseous triangle (Fig. 9.6a).
After the small bleeders are controlled and the remnant soft tissue around the osseous triangle is cleared, the base of the L5 transverse process and the cranial and lateral aspect of SAP are first drilled out (Fig. 9.6b).
Then, the remaining SAP that is located deep in the foramen is removed. At this point, the remaining SAP is too deep and too steep to be reached by the bur. Angled instruments, such as a hockey stick chisel and angled pituitary clamp, are useful in these situations (Fig. 9.6c). While all of these tasks can be accomplished with a 0° scope, sometimes a 30° scope is more useful to provide a wider vision, especially in obese patients.
After drilling out the bone, the ligament flavum is removed using a curette and Kerrison’s punches (Fig. 9.6d). After flavectomy, the L5 exiting root, the perineural fat, and the disc space can be checked (Fig. 9.6e).
If there are offending pathologies at the extra-foraminal area, such as a far lateral disc or marginal osteophytes arising from the vertebral body, it is a good option to drill out the sacral alar before removing the ligament flavum. Removing a part of the sacral alar provides sufficient space to manipulate the endoscope and the surgical instruments. This also allows more space between the L5 exiting root and the disc. This space makes it easier and safer to manipulate the root and remove the herniated disc or the osteophytes (Fig. 9.6f).
After adequate decompression of the L5 exiting root is confirmed, epidural bleeding is controlled by coagulation with RF wands.
5 Illustrated Cases
5.1 Case 1: Paraspinal Foraminotomy at L3–4 Right Side Approach
A 68-year-old male patient complained about L3 pattern radiation pain in his right leg. The symptoms had been noted for 12 months, and he had difficulty walking because of the pain. The straight leg raising (SLR) test was normal. The neurological intermittent claudication was less than 300 meters to 400 meters. He had motor weakness on the right ankle dorsiflexion (grade 4). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for his right leg pain was 7. Preoperative MRI and computed tomography (CT) scan showed right-side foraminal stenosis at the L3–4 level with a bony spur on the right L4 SAP (Fig. 9.7a, b, f).
A paraspinal foraminotomy using the UBE technique under general anesthesia was performed. Under the endoscope, the right L3 exiting root was decompressed, and the bony spur of the SAP was removed (Fig. 9.7e). Postoperative MRI and CT scan confirmed that the right L3–4 foramen was sufficiently decompressed (Fig. 9.7c, d, g). After the surgery, his symptom disappeared immediately.
5.2 Case 2: Paraspinal Discectomy with Resection of the SAP Tip at L3–4 Left
A 56-year-old male patient suffered from left side anterior thigh pain. The pain was distributed along the left L3 dermatome. The pain started 5 days ago, and because of the severe pain, he could not walk. The SLR test was negative on the right leg, and 30 degrees on the left leg. The neurological intermittent claudication was less than 200 meters to 300 meters. The manual muscle test for hip flexion was grade 3 on the left side. The VAS of the left leg pain was 9. Preoperative MRI and CT scan showed a left-side foraminal herniated disc with foraminal stenosis at the L3–4 level (Fig. 9.8a–d).
A paraspinal foraminotomy and discectomy using the UBE technique were performed under general anesthesia. Under the endoscope, the ruptured disc mass was found in the axillar portion of the left L3 exiting root (Fig. 9.8e). After discectomy, the tip of the SAP was removed by a chisel for foraminal decompression. Postoperative MRI and CT scan confirmed that the left L3–4 foramen was sufficiently decompressed (Fig. 9.8f–h). After surgery, his leg pain was immediately improved, and after 1 month, the motor weakness was recovered.
5.3 Case 3: Paraspinal Discectomy at L3–4 Left Side Approach
An 84-year-old female patient visited the hospital with severe left lateral thigh pain. The pain was distributed along the left L3 dermatome. The symptoms started 2 months ago, and because of the pain, she could not sit. The SLR test was negative on the right leg, and 10 degrees on the left leg. The manual muscle test of hip flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were both grade 3 on the left side. The VAS of the left leg pain was 9. Preoperative MRI showed an upward migrated disc herniation at the left L3–4 foramen (Fig. 9.9a, b).
A paraspinal discectomy using the UBE technique was performed under epidural anesthesia. Under the endoscope, the ruptured disc was found beneath the left L3 exiting root. After discectomy, the left L3 exiting root was released, and the engorgement of the root also disappeared (Video 9.3). The postoperative MRI and CT scan showed that the left L3–4 foramen was sufficiently decompressed (Fig. 9.9c, d). After surgery, the VAS of the leg pain was improved from 9 to 1. Motor weakness was not recovered till 3 months after the surgery.
5.4 Case 4: Paraspinal Foraminotomy at L5–S1 Right Side Approach (Video 9.4)
A 62-year-old male patient suffered from right buttock pain. Symptoms had been noted for one year, and in recent months had gradually worsened. Gradually, the limping phenomenon began to appear when walking. He had tried the conservative treatment for eight months with no significant improvement. The VAS for his left leg pain was 6. The SLR test was negative. The neurological intermittent claudication was less than 400 meters to 500 meters. The motor function was normal.
Preoperative MRI and CT scan showed right side foraminal stenosis at the L5–S1 level without segmental instability (Fig. 9.10a–c).
A paraspinal foraminotomy using the UBE technique was performed under epidural anesthesia. Under the endoscope, the neural foramen was compromised, due to a bulging disc and hypertrophy of the foraminal ligament (Fig. 9.10d).
The postoperative MRI and CT scan confirmed that the right L5-S1 foramen was sufficiently decompressed (Fig. 9.10e–g). After surgery, his symptom was improved, and the abnormal gait was recovered immediately.
6 Complications and Their Management
6.1 Bleeding
Occasionally, radicular arterial bleeding can create many difficulties in performing surgery by obscuring the endoscopic visual field due to massive bleeding. The best way is to coagulate the small vessels using the RF wand before bleeding occurs. The alternative hemostatic technique is to ligate the small vessels using a vessel clip.
If bleeding is so severe as to interfere with the surgery, the scope can be advanced as close as possible toward the possible bleeding focus, and the water pressure temporarily increased to wash out the bleeding, find the bleeding focus, and coagulate the bleeding using a small size RF wand (Video 9.5).
Bleeding from the laminotomy surface can be effectively controlled using bone wax. After the surgery, a suction drain tube is mandatory to drain out the oozing from the perineural plexus and muscles, to prevent epidural hematoma.
6.2 Dural Tear/Root Irritation
Dura tear is not a common complication, because the surgery is performed around the exiting root. Rather, postoperative numbness and paresthesia may occur due to excessive manipulation of the root, especially when the operation is done around the dorsal root ganglion. Therefore, this problem can be prevented by gentle manipulation of the root.
7 Surgical Tips and Pitfalls
There are several surgical technical tips and tricks.
First, if the anatomy is confusing, discography can be helpful.
Second, make the approaching angle of the endoscope and instrument 30 degrees to 40 degrees. So, portal incision must be made on the lateral tip of the lower and upper transverse process.
Third, the cranial tip of the SAP can be removed to provide space for additional bone working.
Fourth, when performing partial resection of the SAP tip, the scope retractor is useful for protecting the exiting root.
Fifth, some surgeons do not perform enough SAP resection, because they worry that excessive removal of SAP may predispose them to instability. However, this may result in insufficient neural decompression with persistent symptoms. According to biomechanical studies, less than 75% resection does not induce segmental instability [8, 9]. Because of subsequent articular regeneration, the importance of sufficient neural decompression should over-weigh preserving the integrity of the facet joint.
Finally, radicular artery ligation is needed to maintain a clear operative view.
References
Bose K, Balasubramaniam P. Nerve root canals of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(1):16–8.
Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Lee JS. Clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic partial facetectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(6):1129–35.
Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(2):E93–9.
Heo DH, Sharma S, Park CK. Endoscopic treatment of extraforaminal entrapment of L5 nerve root (far out syndrome) by unilateral biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary clinical results. Neurospine. 2019;16(1):130–7.
Kim JE, Choi DJ. Bi-portal arthroscopic spinal surgery (BASS) with 30 degrees arthroscopy for far lateral approach of L5-S1 - technical note. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):354–8.
Lee CW, Yoon KJ. The usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic technique in multifocal lumbar pathology. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:9528102.
Takeuchi M, Yasuda M, Shima H, Funai M, Osuka K, Takayasu M. Surgical method for lumbar foraminal stenosis. No Shinkei Geka. 2012;40(4):319–23.
Teo EC, Lee KK, Qiu TX, Ng HW, Yang K. The biomechanics of lumbar graded facetectomy under anterior-shear load. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(3):443–9.
Zhou Y, Luo G, Chu TW, Wang J, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, et al. The biomechanical change of lumbar unilateral graded facetectomy and strategies of its microsurgical reconstruction: report of 23 cases. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87(19):1334–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
A video clip of left-sided paraspinal approach at L3-4 (MP4 47622 kb)
A video clip of left-sided paraspinal approach at L5-S1 (MP4 28057 kb)
A video clip of left-sided foraminal decompression with discectomy at L3-4 (MP4 44134 kb)
A video clip of right-sided paraspinal foraminotomy at L5-S1 (MP4 72050 kb)
A video clip of bleeding control using a radiofrequency (MP4 9001 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Song, KS.D., Lee, N., Pao, J.L. (2022). The Paraspinal Approach with Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Foraminal Lesions. In: Heo, D.H., Park, C.W., Son, S.K., Eum, J.H. (eds) Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8201-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8201-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8200-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8201-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)