Abstract
An energy survey of the heat recovery systems from two power generating units has been carried out at a power facility (cogeneration plant). Four Cummins QSV91G power generating units with a capacity of 1,750 kW each are installed at the power plant to generate electric power. Thermal power is generated through heat recovery of the high-temperature cooling circuit of the gas reciprocating engine (GPU) and through the exhaust heat recovery. The thermal power generated is intended for heating the construction support facility. The energy survey was carried out for two units at 25% load. In the absence of any unit-based recording of the heat generated, the following goal has been set: calculation of the thermal power generated in each circuit in different operating modes of the power plants; calculation of the specific fuel consumption for electrical and thermal power generation; determining the heat take-off efficiency in different operating modes of the power plants, determination of heat losses through non-insulated pipelines from recovery boilers. The article presents the findings of the power units survey and calculations to determine the heat generation from each unit inspected and the specific fuel consumption of the power plants in combined mode (electrical and thermal power generation).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The designed installed electrical capacity of the power plant (power unit) is 8 MW, the thermal capacity is at least 8 MW. The electric power is generated with eight gas-fired generating sets (GPUs). The main technical characteristics of the gas reciprocating engines are shown in Table 1.
The fuel used is natural gas.
Thermal power is generated by four power generating units through recuperation of heat coming from the high-temperature cooling circuit of the hot-gas reciprocating engine and the exhaust heat, for which each GPU is equipped with plate-type heat-exchangers and a waste-heat boiler [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
The main technical characteristics of the heat recovery system equipment are shown in Table 2.
The waste-heat recovery system of the power generating unit includes two circuits from each of the four GPUs and grid water pipelines.
The first circuit of the waste-heat recovery system is the high-temperature cooling loop for the generator gas reciprocating engine. In the first circuit, heat extraction from the engine cooling jacket takes place. The second circuit of the GPU heat recovery system is formed with the engine exhaust gas recovery boiler, heat exchanger (heated side), grid plate-type heat-exchangers, piping system, and shut-off valves.
2 Methods
Thermal power generation in each circuit is defined using a formula, kcal/h [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]:
where G—heating medium rate, m3/h; \(\rho\)—density of the heating medium, kg/m3, c—heat capacity of the heating medium, kcal/(kg °С); \(t_1\)—heating medium temperature at the inlet to the heat exchanger or the recovery boiler, °С; \(t_2\)—heating medium temperature at the output from the heat exchanger or the recovery boiler, °С.
Thermal power losses at the non-insulated pipeline section behind the recovery boiler to the heat-exchangers of the heat supply unit are defined according to Formula (1), where t1—temperature of the heating medium at the beginning of the pipeline section, t2—temperature of the heating medium at the end of the pipeline section, °С.
Thermal power generated with one GPU is defined using a formula, kcal/h:
where \(Q_{II}\)—thermal power generated with a GPU for the second circuit, kcal/h; \(Q_{r - b}\)—thermal power generated with a recovery boiler, kcal/h; \(Q_n\)—thermal power losses at the non-insulated pipeline section, kcal/h.
3 Results
Two power units were surveyed at 25% load mode: GPU No. 1 and No. 2. The measurements were taken at the outside temperature of −7 °С. The indicators obtained through the instrumental survey of the GPU 1–2 recovery system are shown in Table 3.
Thermal power generated with the heat exchanger of GPU No. 2 for the second circuit:
Thermal power generated with the recovery boiler:
Losses of thermal power at the non-insulated pipeline section:
Thermal power generated with GPU 2:
At the time of the survey, thermal power was generated with GPU No.1, No.2, No.3 and No.4. The thermal power production at all the GPUs is about the same and equals in aggregate:
The thermal power consumption to cover in-house needs of the power plant is:
The delivery of thermal energy for heating the consumers is:
The thermal power generation and delivery for heating the consumers in the heat supply unit from Heat exchangers No. 2 and No. 3 is determined through the formula:
Imbalance of the heat delivery for heating the consumers is:
The delivery of thermal energy for heating the consumers according to static instruments is 2.36 Gcal/h, the resulting value of the instrumental survey is 2.59 Gcal/h.
4 Discussion
The specific fuel consumption for electric power generation by GPU No. 1 (excluding thermal power generation) is:
where B—natural gas flow, STCm3/h; \(Q_{{\text{GPU}}\,{\text{No}}.1}\)—electric power generation, kW h.
With the power plant running in a combined mode (both electric and thermal power generation), the specific fuel consumption for the electric and thermal power in GPU 1 is equal to:
where \(\sum {Q_{{\text{GPU}}\,{\text{No}}.1} }\)—generation of electric and thermal power, kW h,
-
518.2 kW h—electric power generated with GPU No. 1,
-
518.2 kW h—thermal power generated with GPU No. 1.
The aggregate electric and thermal power generated with GPU No. 1 amounts to 518.2 + 754.1 = 1272.3 kW h. In percentage correlation, the generated electric power made up 40.7%; the generated thermal power—59.3%.
The specific fuel consumption for electric power generation by GPU No. 2 (excluding thermal power generation) is:
where \(Q_{{\text{GPU}}\,{\text{No}}.2}\)—generation of electric power, kW h,
With the power plant running in a combined mode (both electric and thermal power generation), the specific fuel consumption for the electric and thermal power in GPU 2 is equal to:
where \(\sum {Q_{{\text{GPU}}\,{\text{No}}.2} }\)—generation of electric and thermal power, kW h,
-
536.4 kW h—electric power generated with GPU No. 2,
-
780.2 kW h—thermal power generated with GPU No. 2.
5 Conclusions
With the power plants running in combined mode (both electric and thermal power generation), the specific fuel consumption for the electric and thermal power generation in GPU 1, 2, 3 and 4 is equal to:
where \(\sum B\)—natural gas consumed with GPU 1, 2, 3 and 4, STCm3/h (predicted (201.2 + 205.9) × 2 = 814.2); \(\sum {Q_{{\text{GPU}}} }\)—electric and thermal power generation in GPU 1, 2, 3 and 4, kW h,
-
\(538.1;536.4;518.2;536.4\,{\text{kW}}\,{\text{h}}\)—electric power yield,
-
306.6 kW h—thermal power yield.
References
Mozgova, A.S.: Problems of thermal conductivity of closed pressure vessels. In: Salenko, S.D. (ed.) Sci. Ind. defense. Proc. XIX All-Russian Sci. Tech. Conf. vol. 4, pp. 63–65 (2018)
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: Problems of thermal conductivity for storage tanks of liquefied gases and oil products. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1128, 012131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1128/1/012131
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: Thermal conductivity of gasholders during gas storage. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1565, 012057 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1565/1/012057
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: Problems of thermal conductivity of heat networks. Mater. XI All-Russian Sci. Tech. Conf. current issues Archit. Constr., pp. 9–15 (2018)
Mozgova, A., Shennikova, T.: Determination of the real energy efficiency of the inlet ventilation air heater and air curtain. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, 012147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012147
Nemirovsky, Y.V, Mozgova, A.S.: Thermal conductivity of cylindrical tanks for backup fuel of boiler rooms. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1382, 012139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1382/1/012139
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: Thermal conductivity of cylindrical tanks for backup fuel of boiler rooms. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Institute of Physics Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1382/1/012139
Nemirovsky, Y.V, Mozgova, A.S.: Definition of thermal losses on the site of the layered pipeline of heat networks. Bull. Chuvash State Pedagog. Univ. named after I. YA. Yakovlev. Ser. Mech. a limit state № 2, pp. 23–32 (2017)
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: The thermal conductivity of the layered cylinder of finite dimensions. Mod. Quest. Contin. Mech. 2017 Collect. Artic. based Mater. Conf. (round table) with Int. Particip., pp. 60–64 (2017)
Nemirovsky, Y.V, Mozgova, A.S.: The thermal conductivity of a constructional element of the spacecraft in the form of the multilayered cylinder. Bull. Chuvash State Pedagog. Univ. named after I. YA. Yakovlev. Ser. Mech. a limit state № 1, pp. 49–54 (2017)
Nemirovsky, Y.V., Mozgova, A.S.: Two-dimensional steady-state heat conduction problem for heat networks. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1359, 012138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1359/1/012138
Mozgova, A.S., Surikov, A.V: Energy inspection of boilers and heating networks. new Archit. Des. Build. Struct. Reconstr. Mater. III Int. (IX all-russian) Conf., pp. 474–480 (2016)
Kluczek, A., Olszewski, P.: Energy audits in industrial processes. J. Clean. Prod. 3437–3453 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.123
Kluczek, A., Olszewski, P.: Energy audits in industrial processes. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3437–3453 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.123
Alabugin, A.A., Aliukov, S.V., Osintsev, K.V.: Approximation methods for analysis and formation of mechanisms for regulating heat and mass transfer processes in heat equipment systems. Int. J. Heat Technol. 38, 45–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.380106
Fresner, J., Morea, F., Krenn, C., Aranda Uson, J., Tomasi, F.: Energy efficiency in small and medium enterprises: lessons learned from 280 energy audits across Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 1650–1660 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.126
Makridou, G., Andriosopoulos, K., Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: Measuring the efficiency of energy-intensive industries across European countries. Energy Policy 88, 573–583 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.042
Andersson, E., Arfwidsson, O., Bergstrand, V., Thollander, P.: A study of the comparability of energy audit program evaluations. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 2133–2139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.070
Anisimova, T.: Analysis of the reasons of the low interest of Russian enterprises in applying the energy management system. Procedia Econ. Financ. 23, 111–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00424-4
Alabugin, A., Aliukov, S., Osintsev, K.: Management models of efficiency of development of resource and energy saving systems using methods of approximation of step functions. Lect. notes Eng. Comput. Sci. Ser. “Proceedings World Congr. Eng. 2017, WCE 2017”, pp. 102–106 (2017)
Borshcheniuk, V., Semeryanova, N., Filatova, U., Nikolaeva, D., Frolova, E.: Issues of implementing the state program of energy saving and energy efficiency. E3S Web Conf. 110, 02080 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911002080
Cagno, E., Trianni, A.: Evaluating the barriers to specific industrial energy efficiency measures: an exploratory study in small and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 82, 70–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.057
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mozgova, A.S., Shchennikova, T.V. (2022). Energy Survey of the Cogeneration Plant. In: Vatin, N.I., Tamrazyan, A.G., Plotnikov, A.N., Leonovich, S.N., Pakrastins, L., Rakhmonzoda, A. (eds) Advances in Construction and Development. CDLC 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 197. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6593-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6593-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6592-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6593-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)