Abstract
Plastics, especially low-density polyethylene (LDPE), is now being the most effective pollutant on Earth due to its non-degradability and increased demand. The reduced reusability and recyclability of these plastics makes more hurdle in proper disposal and treatment of these wastes. Thus, this problem can be managed only by implementing an alternative method of recycling these polymeric compounds for other beneficial purposes. The aim of this study is to suggest an ecofriendly approach of disposing these wastes by using it as bitumen modifiers. The effect of LDPE on bitumen has been analyzed by different wt% of LDPE from 2 to 8 wt% and was compared with pristine bitumen. Characterization tests mainly viscosity test, standard penetration and softening point, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and rheological analysis were done in order to examine the effect of LDPE addition to bitumen. The results show rise in thermal stability and deformation resistance for modified bitumen. However, a rise in polymer content above an optimum limit is not preferable. LDPE addition of 4% shows a better performance and is suggestable for employing in road sectors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Owing to the use in many aspects of our lives, plastics produce a significant quantity of waste on Earth such as packaging, building and manufacturing, automobile, electrical, and computer uses. Plastics are polymers derived primarily from fossil fuels by-products and made primarily by variations of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen [1]. Though these possess extreme temperature tolerance, resistant to UV irradiation, and often non-biodegradable, these are able to continue polluting the whole Earth for centuries. Plastics appear to detach into smaller, meso-, and micro-structured nature that have unique and important effects on the environment that may have a detrimental impact on the health of humans and animals involved with the structure. Bioaccumulation of these to the food chain causes severe impacts on humans [2]. The asphalt industry is extensively involved in polymer improvements in bitumen to boost the properties of bentonite, impacting breaking, breakdown, and rolling pavements in thermal tolerance. Polymers are well known for their usage to significantly improve the performance of bitumen. Polymers are capable of increasing the elasticity and the stability, therewith increasing the durability, versatility, and deformation resistance for asphalt mixtures and reducing their temperature sensitivity [3].
Polymer alteration of bitumen has been shown to enhance different properties of bitumen including high-temperature rigidity, moisture tolerance, fatigue life, and the ability to lower temperature stresses. Bitumen modifiers have three types of polymers, according to the chemistry and properties of their materials: plastomers, elastomers, and reactive polymers [4]. Each serves different functions like increase in stiffness can be attained by addition of plastomers, whereas fatigue properties can be raised using elastomers. Majority of plastomers effect the thermal properties of binder, especially reduces the thermal susceptibility of bitumen [5]. Plastomers not only just decreases the stiffness parameter but also provides deformation resistance to a greater extent. The major plastomers which we usually deal with are polyethylene and are waste materials after use. Polyethylene has many forms out of which high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) are more available. LDPE is commonly the non-reusable waste plastic which has a melting temperature of around 125 ℃. For common bitumen binders, the temperature adopted is above 170 ℃ which makes LDPE to consider as bitumen modifier as its melting temperature is less than that of bitumen [6].
Hinislioglua and Agar worked on various concentration of HDPE additions in asphalt concrete HDPE concentrations on four to eight wt. % in asphalt concrete 20. The temperature variations have been done at 145–160 ℃ with mixing duration ranging from 5 to 30 min. The results show high-stability and high-marshal quotient, and out of those, the best results were obtained for 4%/135 ℃/30 min composition. Moreover, this mix was also highly resistant to permanent deformation (rutting) [7]. Deformation resistance was also notable for this mixture. In a study done by Zoorab et al. [8] has done incorporation of polypropylene and low-density polyethylene in bituminous concrete mixture this shows an increase in properties like durability and resistance to deformation. The incorporation of recycled plastic in pavement design will not only increase the basic pavement properties but also give economic as well as environmental advantages [8]. Nearly, every industry uses plastics and its use is very likely to grow as plastics technologies are developed, causing plastic waste to increase in turn. Because they are found to modify the ecosystem’s functionality it is important that instead of being left freely in nature or landfilled, to take into account preventive or reduced plastic waste and to restore this ecologically hazardous waste. As the present waste management concentrates on 3R principle, more changes have to be introduced [9]. Novel strategies are to be established before these turns out to be non-manageable crisis. Shredded plastic-reinforced hot mix asphalt is a research field for such a goal that is still in its early stages. It can be used as strengthening components for pavement asphalt of concrete. In the past literatures, polyethylene waste was typically applied with dry process to the asphalt mixture or used as an aggregate for improving the HMA output in the asphalted mixture (aggregated substitution) [10]. The literatures has revealed an increase in permanent resistance to deformation, Marshall stability, stiffness, and tiredness in asphalt mixtures, while a reduction in moisture damage was also observed while using shredded plastics in pavements. The past works also highlights a reduction specific gravity for these asphalt mixtures.
Even though there are a few investigations that have been done on using polyethylene as binder modifiers, the incorporation of recycled low-density polyethylene into bitumen was less explored one. Thus, the aim of this work is to investigate the effect of recycled LDPE in modifying bitumen properties. LDPE with different wt% (2, 4, 6, and 8%) were studied, and physical, thermal, chemical, and rheological properties of every samples were analyzed and are compared with pristine hot mix asphalt.
2 Materials
2.1 Fabrication of Shredded Polyethene
The polyethene waste was collected from the dumping yard at Kollam, Kerala. The collected plastic waste includes, low-density and high-density polyethylene derivatives and a few of PET low-grade bottles. The initial steps were sorting of the plastics, cleaning, and then drying. The polyethene bags were shredded into flakes so as to get a size range of 2.36 to 4.75 mm by maintaining an aspect ratio of 2:1 shown in Fig. 1. The tensile strength analysis of the flakes has been done with 10 mm/min of elongation. The results obtained were on an average of 0.31KN, thereby providing an elongation rate of 25%.
2.2 Incorporation of Polyethylene to Bitumen
For preparing bitumen—polyethylene blend—the bitumen was initially heated to a temperature of 170 ℃. Then, the shredded low-density polyethylene flakes were added to the bitumen, thereby obtaining bitumen polyethylene blend. The LDPE additive was incorporated to pristine bitumen at 2, 4, 6, and 8% weight ratios and is described in Table 1. Uniform polymer–bitumen blended mixture was obtained using shear mixer at a rate of 4000 rotations per minute. The mixing was done for an average of 2 h maintaining the temperature of 180 ℃.
3 Methodology and Characterization
3.1 Viscosity
Rotational viscosity tests were conducted according to ASTM D-4402 at 135 ℃. The tests were done for pristine as well as modified binders. Brookfield DV III rheometer was employed for testing.
3.2 Penetration and Softening Point
The softening point was measured using ring and ball analysis in accordance with ASTM D36. The penetration test was conducted by following ASTM D-5 [11]. Both tests were done for pristine and modified binders.
3.3 FTIR Analysis
FTIR tests were done for identifying the functional groups present in both pristine and modified bitumen. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR in transmission mode, Cary 630, Agilent Technologies).
3.4 TGA Analysis
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of nanoparticle was carried out under a constant flow of nitrogen at a heating rate of 10 ℃/min on the Hitachi, STA7200 TGA instrument.
3.5 Rheological Analysis
The rheological tests were done using dynamic shears rheometer (DSR) (Physica MCR302, Anton Paar). Frequency sweep test was conducted for bitumen at linear viscoelastic region at 60 ℃, and the frequency range adopted was 0.1–10 Hz. For this, DSR plates with a radius of 12.5 mm having a thickness of 1 mm. The storage and loss modulus were obtained as output for respective frequency. The shear modulus and phase angle were calculated according to [12]
where G1 is storage modulus; G2 is loss modulus; G is complex shear modulus; δ is the phase angle.
4 Results and Discussion
4.1 Viscosity
Viscosity is considered to be a basic physical property of bitumen which gives the flow resistance of fluid. The rotational viscosity of bitumen and bitumen polyethylene blend has been tested for analyzing the resistance to shear stress. The results showing the effect of varying concentration of LDPE are given in Fig. 2, and from the results, it depicts that by increasing LDPE concentration, there shows a significant rise in viscosity in comparison with pristine bitumen [12]. At 130 ℃, the viscosity was about 0.59 Pa.s for normal pristine bitumen. The variation in polyethylene content was done for 2%, 4%, 6%, and 8 wt% which rises the viscosity to 0.75, 1.21, and 2.98. The obtained results are on agreement with previous literatures [13]. The rise in viscosity also results in rising the temperature stability of the bitumen polyethene blend. The enhancement in viscosity with rise in polyethene concentration is due to the presence of asphaltenes, which results in the formation of complex internal structure. But increased viscosity may effects workability of the mix for 8 wt% sample which has effects on mixing and workability.
4.2 Determination of Penetration and Softening Point
The results of penetration and softening point was according to the expectation that these properties get good results with addition of LDPE and are given in Figs. 3 and 4. The penetration test depicts the flow and deformation properties of the LDPE–bitumen mix. The penetration decreased with rise in the polymer concentration. Pristine bitumen shows penetration value of 55.1 mm, while with rise in concentration of polymer to 2wt%, 4wt%, 6wt%, and 8 wt%, the penetration results were 52.3 mm, 44.7 mm, 33.2 mm, and 22.2 mm, respectively. The reduction in the penetration of the bitumen polymer blend shows the increased hardening of the bitumen with addition of polymer [14]. The effect of polymer in physical properties of bitumen is evident from reduction in penetration results. The reduced penetration results show the ability of modified bitumen to resist temperature effects and rutting [15].
Rise in softening point values was observed with rise in polymer concentration. The softening point of the pristine bitumen was 51 ℃ which gets increased to 54, 76, 94, and 108 ℃ with 2, 4, 6, and 8 wt% of polyethene additions. The complexation in internal structure caused by addition of polymer results in the rise in softening point of modified mix. From the raised softening point is evident that the modified mix has better resistance to deformation at varying range of temperature. These blended mixtures will be strong enough to resist rutting [16].
4.3 FTIR
The FTIR analysis of both pristine and modified asphalt samples was done and is given in Fig. 5. It is evident that both pristine and modified bitumen have major similar peaks with only few new peaks for modified bitumen. The peaks at pristine bitumen at 2918.3 cm–1 show the presence of CH stretching vibrations, thus confirming the presence of organic hydrocarbons in the bitumen. These peaks are also seen in polymer blended bitumen samples at 2916.21 cm−1. C=C attraction was found to be observed at 1598 cm−1. The addition of LDPE is confirmed by the peaks in range of 1200–750 cm−1. The SO2 peaks at 1329 cm−1 confirm the addition of polymer of bitumen matrix [17].
4.4 Rutting and Fatigue Properties
The rutting and fatigue properties were analyzed by conducting DSR test of the LDPE-added bitumen mixes. The test was done at a wide range of temperatures as 64 and 70 ℃. The rutting was analyzed in reference to ASTM D2872. The result of DSR test is given in Table 2. The shear modulus (G) and phase angles were analyzed by the DSR tests. G indicates that the shear modulus depicts the stiffness of asphalt mix samples. The elasticity at varying temperature was determined as phase angles (δ). As phase angles decreases, the elasticity of the bitumen mix rises which in turn increase the resulting rutting tolerance. From the results, the modified bitumen binders has reduced δ value for both aged and unaged RTFO samples [18]. Ideally, the bitumen possesses a specific stiffness value to relieve rutting. From Table 2, it is evident that a reduction in G value can be noted, thus causing reduction of rutting parameter (G/sin δ). Referring the pavement criterions, AASHTO: MP1, the value of rutting parameter should be greater than 2.2 kPa; for aged RTFO sample, it must be 1 kPa. From the results, the values of the modified bitumen are favorable, and thus concludes its better tolerance against rutting. G Sin θ δ is considered as the fatigue parameter and must be less than 5000 kPa for PAV-pressurized aged vessel bitumen samples [19]. The results are under the higher limit and fatigue prominent at temperature less than 20 ℃, thus concluding that the polymer bitumen mixture has enough rutting and fatigue resistance.
4.5 TGA
Thermal gravimetric analysis was done to test the thermal stability of the prepared samples. The decomposition of the samples with respect to temperature was identified by TGA analysis. The respective weight loss at varying temperature is provided with TGA curve in Fig. 6. From the results, it is seen that the weight loss was evidently high during a temperature range of 380–500 ℃ [20]. The loss in weight at this temperature range was because of decomposition of bituminous compounds in mixture. These bituminous compounds include the aromatics and saturates in asphalt [21]. The pristine bitumen shows a higher decomposition than modified samples. The reduced decomposition of modified samples is due to its reduced evaporation, and thus makes it clear that these modified samples have a greater stability over varying temperature ranges.
5 Conclusion
The performance of the pristine asphalt has been intensified by the polyethene addition. The reusing of polyethene bags as an asphalt additive was done in this work which in turn reduces the plastic contamination of nature. The characteristic analysis shows that there is a notable enhancement in the overall properties of the pristine bitumen. As expected, the physical properties like viscosity and softening point get raised with increase in concentration of polymer. The penetration and softening point results give emphasis that the stiffness gets raised with rise in polymer concentration. The chemical composition was analyzed using FTIR, and it seems not to have drastic changes in absorbance peaks. The temperature stability was in higher side for modified bitumen mixes. From the DSR test, the rise in fatigue and rutting resistance was confirmed as these modified binders have much more rutting and fatigue resistance than pristine bitumen. Discussing about the limitation, the viscosity seems to affect the workability at higher concentration of polymer. A drastic rise in viscosity was observed for LDPE 3 and LDPE 4 mixes which are of polymer 6 and 8 wt%; this heavy rise in viscosity will curb the workability of the mixture. Thus, an additive concentration of 4% can be suggested so as to get an optimum workability along with increased overall performance. As a conclusion, it can be summarized that incorporation of additive gives favorable effects on rheological as well as overall properties of bitumen. Thus, using polyethene waste as bitumen modifier has a great potential in road pavements as well as for a clean environment.
References
Carson, H. S., Colbert, S. L., Kaylor, M. J., & McDermid, K. J. (2011). Small plastic debris changes water movement and heat transfer through beach sediments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.032
Katsanevakis, S., Verriopoulos, G., Nicolaidou, A., & Thessalou-Legaki, M. (2007). Effect of marine litter on the benthic megafauna of coastal soft bottoms: A manipulative field experiment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.016
Gama, D. A., Yan, Y., Rodrigues, J. K. G., Roque, R. (2018). Optimizing the use of reactive terpolymer, polyphosphoric acid and high-density polyethylene to achieve asphalt binders with superior performance. Construction and Building Materials, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.206
García-Travé, G., Tauste, R., Moreno-Navarro, F., Sol-Sánchez, M., & Rubio-Gámez, M. C. (2016). Use of reclaimed geomembranes for modification of mechanical performance of bituminous binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001507
Brasileiro, L., Moreno-Navarro, F., Tauste-Martínez, R., Matos, J., Rubio-Gámez, M., & del, C. (2019). Reclaimed polymers as asphalt binder modifiers for more sustainable roads: A review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030646
Costa, L. M. B., Silva, H. M. R. D., Peralta, J., & Oliveira, J. R. M. (2019). Using waste polymers as a reliable alternative for asphalt binder modification—Performance and morphological assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.279
Hinislioglu, S., & Agar, E. (2004). Use of waste high density polyethylene as bitumen modifier in asphalt concrete mix. Materials Letters, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00458-0
Zoorob, S. E., & Suparma, L. B. (2000). Laboratory design and investigation of the properties of continuously graded Asphaltic concrete containing recycled plastics aggregate replacement (Plastiphalt). Cement and Concrete Composites, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00026-3
Cobut, A., Blanchet, P., & Beauregard, R. (2015). The environmental footprint of interior wood doors in non-residential buildings—Part 1: Life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.079
Baghaee Moghaddam, T., Soltani, M., & Karim, M. R. (2014). Evaluation of permanent deformation characteristics of unmodified and Polyethylene Terephthalate modified asphalt mixtures using dynamic creep test. Materials and Design, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.015
Read, J., & Whiteoak, D. (2003). The Shell bitumen handbook.
Oliveira, J. R. M., Silva, H. M. R. D., Abreu, L. P. F., & Fernandes, S. R. M. (2013). Use of a warm mix asphalt additive to reduce the production temperatures and to improve the performance of asphalt rubber mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2012.09.047
Sybilski, D. (1997). New simplified equation for the computation of absolute viscosity of polymer-bitumens. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02486391
Cong, P., Xun, P., Xing, M., & Chen, S. (2013). Investigation of asphalt binder containing various crumb rubbers and asphalts. Construction and Building Materials, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.063
Yu, J., Zeng, X., Wu, S., Wang, L., & Liu, G. (2007). Preparation and properties of montmorillonite modified asphalts. Materials Science and Engineering A, 447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.037
Bala, N., Kamaruddin, I., & Napiah, M. (2017). The influence of polymer on rheological and thermo oxidative aging properties of modified bitumen binders. Jurnal Teknologi, 79. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.10180
Gürü, M., Çubuk, M. K., Arslan, D., Farzanian, S. A., Bilici, I. (2014). An approach to the usage of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste as roadway pavement material. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.018
Presti, D. L., Izquierdo, M. A., & Jiménez del Barco Carrión, A. (2018). Toward storage-stable high-content recycled tyre rubber modified bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.226
Nizamuddin, S., Jamal, M., Gravina, R., & Giustozzi, F. (2020). Recycled plastic as bitumen modifier: The role of recycled linear low-density polyethylene in the modification of physical, chemical and rheological properties of bitumen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121988
Farahani, H. Z., Palassi, M., & Sadeghpour Galooyak, S. (2017). Thermal analysis of bitumen modified with LDPE and CR. Petroleum Science and Technology, 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2017.1319385
Zhang, F., & Hu, C. (2016). The research for crumb rubber/waste plastic compound modified asphalt. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5198-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vijayan, V., Tharayil, J.M., Krishna, R.R., Saji, J., Shaji, D.S., Lakshmi, G. (2022). Sustainable Bituminous Pavement: A Study on Low-Density Polymer Modified Bituminous Binder. In: Gupta, A.K., Shukla, S.K., Azamathulla, H. (eds) Advances in Construction Materials and Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 196. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6557-8_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6557-8_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6556-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6557-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)