Skip to main content

The Future of Expertise: From Stepwise Domain Upskilling to Multifaceted Mastery

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific

Abstract

This chapter discusses how our understanding of twenty-first-century skills and competencies has changed amidst ongoing waves of digitalization in the modern workplace. Specifically, it takes a deeper look at what it means to be an expert in a digital age and the implications this has on (workplace) learning and training. Extant literature on the development of expertise and skills tends to take a linear approach: becoming a skillful practitioner is a matter of gradual and progressive development along the different phases from novice to master. This chapter, on the contrary, argues that this linear model is not adequate to capture the complexities of what it means to be an expert in a digital era. Because digital transformation occurs at an increasingly faster pace, there is not one interpretation of what constitutes expertise in a given timeframe and profession. In other words, expertise has increasingly become distributed amongst professionals in different fields and different generations, as well as between professionals and technologies. This chapter focuses on this distribution of expertise and proposes a reconceptualization of the term that goes beyond expertise as stepwise domain upskilling to include a more holistic understanding of expertise as multifaceted mastery. This reconceptualization captures how expertise is becoming distributed in ever more complex ways across people and technologies. It also opens up ways to reconsider learning and development as not occurring via a neatly organized line of progressing from novice to expert but as a lifelong process affected by several feedback loops. The above are substantiated mainly by empirical work conducted within Singapore’s manufacturing sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anteby, M., & Holm, A. L. (2021). Translating expertise across work contexts: US Puppeteers move from stage to screen. American Sociological Review, 86(2), 310–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., Faraj, S., Hinds, P., von Krogh, G., & Leonardi, P. (2019). Special issue of organization science: Emerging technologies and organizing. Organization Science, 30(3), 642–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. (2020). Work and technological change. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., & Beane, M. I. (2020). How should we study intelligent technologies’ implications for work and employment? In Work and technological change (pp. 69–115). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonders of exemplary performance. In Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students (pp. 161–186).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2010). The perils of confusing lifelong learning with lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(4), 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. S. (2010). Enactments of expertise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 21–30). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise (Vol. 3). Springer science & business media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, H. A., Huising, R., & Peduzzi, M. (2021). Role reconfiguration: what ethnographic studies tell us about the implications of technological change for work and collaboration in healthcare. BMJ Leader, 5(2), leader-2020-000224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2016). The rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment. Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner, A. (2013). Transitions of expertise. In J. Seifried & E. Wuttke (Eds.), Transitions in vocational education (pp. 305–319). Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, M. L., & Grenier, R. S. (2021). Expertise at Work. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Güllich, A., Macnamara, B. N., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2021). What makes a Champion? early multidisciplinary practice, not early specialization, predicts world-class performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620974772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjmichael, D., & Tsoukas, H. (2019). Towards a better understanding of tacit knowledge in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0084

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1984). Two courses of expertise. 乳幼児発達臨床センター年報, 6, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R. (1992). The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical artificial intelligence. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, J. A., Duerden Comeau, T., & Jovic, E. (2007). Generational affinities and discourses of difference: A case study of highly skilled information technology workers. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (2021). Seeing like a state, enacting like an algorithm: (Re) assembling contact tracing and risk assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(1), 01622439211021916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2016). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., Mørk, B. E., Masovic, J., & Hanseth, O. (2017). Expertise as trans-situated. Skillful Performance: Enacting Capabilities, Knowledge, Competence, and Expertise in Organizations, 7, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. ILR Press/ Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachidi, S., Berends, H., Faraj, S., & Huysman, M. (2021). Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organization Science, 32(1), 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, K. W., Willems, T., Ang, J. Y., Tang, C., Foo, H. T., & Liu, W. (2021). Mastery in the digital age: Reconceptualizing expertise, developing deep technical mastery, and accelerating effective workplace learning. Skills Future Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunath, N. (2021). Shaping the futures of work: Proactive governance and millennials. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2017). Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence, and expertise in organizations (Vol. 7). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J., & Pinnington, A. H. (2009). Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1138–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2018). Towards a reskilling revolution: A future of jobs for all.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeeva, A. V., Faraj, S., & Huysman, M. (2020). Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organization Science, 31(5), 1248–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, D. (2020). A world without work: Technology, automation and how we should respond. Penguin UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, T., & Hafermalz, E. (2021). Distributed seeing: Algorithms and the reconfiguration of the workplace, a case of ‘automated’ trading. Information & Organization 31(4), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100376.

  • Yanow, D. (2015). After mastery: Insights from practice theorizing. In R. Garud, B. Simpson, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The emergence of novelty in organizations (pp. 272–317). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to King Wang Poon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Poon, K.W., Willems, T., Liu, W.S.Y. (2023). The Future of Expertise: From Stepwise Domain Upskilling to Multifaceted Mastery. In: Lee, W.O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A.L., Green, A. (eds) International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_42-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_42-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics