Keywords

1.1 Atlas Internal Fixation: A Historical Perspective

Atlas fixation technique was developed to meet the needs of reconstruction of atlantoaxial stability. It has undergone the development of the wire technique, the laminoplasty technique, and the lateral mass technique. Milestones in the development of atlas fixation techniques include Gallie technique [1] (Fig. 1.1); Brooks-Jenkins technique [2] (Fig. 1.2); Dickman method [3], also called Sonntag technique (Fig. 1.3); Halifax technique [4] (Fig. 1.4); Jeanneret and Magerl technique [5] (Fig. 1.5); Goel technique by Goel and Laher [6] (Fig. 1.6); Harms and Melcher technique [7] (Fig. 1.7); and Tan’s technique [8] (Fig. 1.8).

Fig. 1.1
figure 1

Gallie technique for atlantoaxial fusion

Fig. 1.2
figure 2

Brooks-Jenkins technique for atlantoaxial fusion

Fig. 1.3
figure 3

Sonntag technique for atlantoaxial fusion

Fig. 1.4
figure 4

Halifax technique for atlantoaxial fusion

Fig. 1.5
figure 5

Magerl’s transarticular screw technique for atlantoaxial fusion. (Left) Posterior view. (Right) Lateral view

Fig. 1.6
figure 6

Goel technique for atlantoaxial fusion

Fig. 1.7
figure 7

Harms and Melcher technique for atlantoaxial fusion. (a) Posterior view of the upper cervical spine showing the location of the entry points in C1 and C2. (b) Lateral view. (c) Posterior view

Fig. 1.8
figure 8

Tan’s technique for atlantoaxial fusion. (a) Axial view; (b) Lateral view

1.2 Atlas Anatomy

The atlas consists of an anterior and posterior arch connected by two lateral articular masses, forming a ring that pivots about the odontoid process. It lacks a vertebral body.

  1. 1.

    Measurement of the transverse section (Fig. 1.9)

Fig. 1.9
figure 9

The superior view of the atlas. The axial image shows the screw entry site on the lateral mass and direction of screw entry (forming a 5°–10°angle with the sagittal plane)

  1. 2.

    The anterior view of C1 (Fig. 1.10)

Fig. 1.10
figure 10

The anterior view of the atlas. The height of the lateral mass in the medial border is 8.81 ± 1.46 mm; the height of the lateral mass in the lateral border is 18.01 ± 2.33 mm [9]

  1. 3.

    The posterior view of C1 (Fig.1.11)

Fig. 1.11
figure 11

The posterior view of the atlas. The vertebral artery courses through the groove and overlaps with the posterior arch of the atlas in the posterior view. The pedicle height is 4.80 ± 0.93 mm; the pedicle width is 9.82 ± 1.48 mm [9]

  1. 4.

    The lateral view of C1 (Fig. 1.12)

Fig. 1.12
figure 12

The lateral view of the atlas. The ideal entry path can be seen in the lateral view (at a caudocephalad angle of 10–15°). Note that the entry site is located at the junction of the posterior ring and the lateral mass

  1. 5.

    The sectional view of screw entry site in the lateral mass

Screw entry site via the posterior arch lateral mass (Figs. 1.13, 1.14, and 1.15):

Fig. 1.13
figure 13

Dimensions of the lateral mass of the atlas. (a) The distance between the entry site and the anterior edge of the lateral mass is 28.01 ± 1.35 mm in the right and 27.98 ± 1.24 in the left; (b) The distance between the entry site and the middle line is 13.82 ± 1.05 mm in the right and 13.81 ± 1.06 mm in the left; (c) The width of the lateral mass is 8.27 ± 1.63 mm in the right and 8.24 ± 1.62 mm in the left

Fig. 1.14
figure 14

Dimensions of the lateral mass of the atlas. (d) The height of the lateral mass is 10.24 ± 0.80 mm in the right and 10.22 ± 0.80 mm in the left

Fig. 1.15
figure 15

Dimensions of the pedicle of the atlas. (e) The pedicle height is 4.62 ± 1.06 mm in the right and 4.56 ± 1.12 mm in the left; (f) The pedicle width is 9.63 ± 1.51 mm in the right and 9.69 ± 1.36 mm in the left

1.3 Key Points of Atlas Lateral Mass Screw Technique

1.3.1 Determining Screw Entry Points in the Lateral Mass of the Atlas

Anatomically, the atlas is peculiar as it has neither a vertebral body nor a vertebral lamina. Therefore, the vertebral pedicle does not exist anatomically.

There are two entry methods (methods A and B) for screw placement in the atlas (Figs. 1.16, 1.17, and 1.18).

Fig. 1.16
figure 16

Two methods of screw entry

Fig. 1.17
figure 17

Comparison of two screw entry sites

Fig. 1.18
figure 18

An illustrative case with free dens showing the pedicle section

Method A is a clinically commonly used fixation technique for screw entry into C1 lateral mass via the posterior arch and the isthmus.

In method B, the screw is directly inserted along the longitudinal axis of the lateral mass of the atlas at the transition zone between the inferior border of the posterior arch and the posterior border of the lateral mass of the atlas. Because the vertebral vein and C2 nerve roots run across the entry path, nerves and blood vessels may be inadvertently injured intraoperatively, leading to profuse bleeding; however, hemostasis is difficult to achieve (Table 1.1).

Table 1.1 Comparison of methods A and B

1.3.2 Entry Angle for a C1 Lateral Mass Screw

  1. 6.

    Method A: The entry angle for a lateral mass screw via the posterior arch of the atlas (Fig. 1.19)

Fig. 1.19
figure 19

Screw entry angle

  1. 7.

    Method B: The entry angle for a screw with direct entry into the lateral mass (Fig. 1.20)

Fig. 1.20
figure 20

Screw entry angle

The screw is situated in the lateral mass of the atlas, at a distance of 3–4 mm from the superior facet of C1 with a medial inclination of 15°.

1.3.3 Depth of C1 Lateral Mass Screws

  1. 1.

    The screw is inserted for an approximate depth of 25 mm into the lateral mass of the atlas.

  2. 2.

    Diameter of C1 lateral mass screws: The diameter of the most commonly used lateral mass screws is 3.5 mm.

  3. 3.

    The length of screw inside the bone in method A is longer than that of method B.

1.4 Surgical Steps (Method A)

  1. 1.

    A mill is used to disrupt the cortical bone at the screw entry point (Fig.1.21).

Fig. 1.21
figure 21

A mill is used to disrupt the cortical bone

  1. 2.

    A screw hole is drilled using a drill bit (Fig. 1.22).

Fig. 1.22
figure 22

A screw hole is drilled using a drill bit

  1. 3.

    Drill depth is increased using a 3.5-mm drill bit with drill guide (Fig. 1.23).

Fig. 1.23
figure 23

Increasing the drill depth

  1. 4.

    The screw path is then probed (Fig. 1.24).

Fig. 1.24
figure 24

Probing the screw path

  1. 5.

    The screw path is tapped (Fig. 1.25).

Fig. 1.25
figure 25

Tapping the screw path

  1. 6.

    The screw is implanted (Figs. 1.26 and 1.27).

Fig. 1.26
figure 26

The screw is implanted

Fig. 1.27
figure 27

The contralateral screw is implanted

  1. 7.

    Section at the screw path of a C1 lateral mass screw (Figs. 1.28, 1.29, and 1.30).

Fig. 1.28
figure 28

Lateral view of the screw path

Fig. 1.29
figure 29

Sectional view of the screw path

Fig. 1.30
figure 30

Sectional view of the screw path in the lateral mass

Posterior arch of the atlas/section of screw entry site

1.5 Imaging Features of Standard Pedicle Screws of the Atlas (Figs. 1.31, 1.32, 1.33, 1.34, and 1.35)

Case 1

Patient: A 54-year old female complained of traumatic neck pain with limited mobility for 25 days.

Fig. 1.31
figure 31

Lateral view of atlantoaxial fixation

Fig. 1.32
figure 32

The superior view of C1 lateral mass screw

Fig. 1.33
figure 33

The anterior view of atlantoaxial fixation

Fig. 1.34
figure 34

The posterior view of atlantoaxial fixation

Fig. 1.35
figure 35

The coronal section view of Atlantoaxial fixation

Diagnosis: C2 odontoid fracture (Fig. 1.36).

Fig. 1.36
figure 36

Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction. Split coronal (a, posterior view) and longitudinal (b, lateral view) 3D CT reconstruction images of the spinal canal

Surgery: VERTEX internal fixation with bone graft and fusion (Figs. 1.37 and 1.38).

Fig. 1.37
figure 37

Location of internal fixation (anterior view)

Fig. 1.38
figure 38

Location of internal fixation. (a) Posterior view; (b) Lateral view

Case 2

Patient: A 40-year-old female complained of cervico-occipital pain for 5 years

Diagnosis: Congenital odontoid malformation and C1–C2 dislocation (Fig. 1.39).

Fig. 1.39
figure 39

Image of the spinal canal (sagittal view). C1 anterior arch; free odontoid process; C1–C2 dislocation; C1 posterior arch

Surgery: C1–C3 open reduction via the posterior, VERTEX internal fixation, iliac crest bone graft and fusion (Figs. 1.40 and 1.41).

Fig. 1.40
figure 40figure 40

Postoperative 3D reconstruction. (a) Location of internal fixation (posterior view); (b) Location of internal fixation (posterior view); (c) Position of C1 lateral mass screw (horizontal view); (d) Location C2 pedicle screw (horizontal view)

Fig. 1.41
figure 41

Location of internal fixation (lateral view)

Caution: Simple instability of C1–C2 only requires stabilization by reduction. When atlantoaxial or foramen magnum decompression is not required, C1 and C2 segments should be chosen for stabilization. In this patient, C3 was stabilized (Fig. 1.41), which is beyond the aforementioned segments to be stabilized. In addition, stabilization should not be extended to the occipital bone.

1.6 Pearls and Pitfalls

  1. 1.

    Caution should be exercised when a C1 lateral mass screw is inserted. The lateral mass of the atlas is approximately 27 mm in length, 8 mm in width, and 10 mm in height, and anatomical studies have demonstrated that a screw of 3.5 mm in diameter is safe.

  2. 2.

    The posterior arch and lateral mass of the atlas have scant cancellous bone and are solid. The screw path should be prepared with caution, and use of a tap is recommended to prevent rupture of the screw path.

  3. 3.

    Lateral to the posterior arch of the atlas runs the vertebral artery, and inferior to the posterior arch travels the venous plexus and inside is the cervical spinal cord. A surgeon should be familiar with regional anatomy and avoid injury to the nerve roots and vessels during operation.