Abstract
The interpretation of mixed DNA samples represents a very compelling research field for the forensic community. Modern short tandem repeat (STR)-based kits can sequence several markers with a high degree of diversity; in the same way, the analysis of STR sequence variation in sample population groups highlighted that several current STR loci lack the necessary sequence diversity. Moreover, in the past few years, new forensic DNA profiling methodologies have been developed based on the use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS), also referred to as next-generation sequencing (NGS).
The current human STR kits use markers with different heterozygosities, showing some highly heterozygous loci, while others are only marginally heterozygous. New methods offer the opportunity to enhance human identification for forensic purposes in DNA mixtures: using new multiplex kits with highly heterozygous STRs, it is possible to solve more effectively the interpretation of many complex mixture samples. Regarding these concerns, MPS methods have improved the discrimination power by investigating genetic diversity through the analysis of both STRs and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located near the flanking region.
Nevertheless, to date, the mixtures generated by more than two contributors (three or more persons) remain frequently unsolved because of the difficulties in the evaluation of stochastic effects and/or other technical problems, such as the differences between true alleles and stutter products. For these reasons, future studies are needed in order to overcome both these technical and interpretation difficulties.
Finally, it is important to remark on the importance of statistical methods to establish the “weight of the evidence,” particularly for the interpretation of MPS multiplex kits for forensic DNA analysis. The interpretation of MPS results remains another interesting research field for the forensic community, particularly in the application of statistical methodologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen MM, Balding DJ (2019) Y-profile evidence: close paternal relatives and mixtures. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.004
Aronson JD (2007) Genetic witness: science, law, and controversy in the making of DNA profiling. Rutgers Univ Pr. ISBN-10: 0813541883
Asmundo A, Perri F, Sapienza D (2006) Allele distribution of two X-chromosomal STR loci in a population from Sicily (Southern Italy). Int Congr Ser. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.11.133
Balding DJ (1999) When can a DNA profile be regarded as unique? Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(99)72057-5
Balding DJ, Nichols RA (1994) DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(94)90222-4
Berry DA, Evett IW, Pinchin R (1992) Statistical inference in crime investigations using deoxyribonucleic acid profiling. Appl Stat. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348086
Bille T, Bright JA, Buckleton J (2013) Application of random match probability calculations to mixed str profiles. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12067
Børsting C, Morling N (2015) Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.002
Buckleton JS, Walsh S, Harbison SA (2001) The fallacy of independence testing and the use of the product rule. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71858-8
Budowle B, Giusti AM, Waye JS et al (1991) Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. Am J Hum Genet 48(5):841–855
Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A (2009) Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croat Med J. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2009.50.207
Butler JM, Kline MC, Coble MD (2018) NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13): variation observed and lessons learned. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.024
Churchill JD, Schmedes SE, King JL, Budowle B (2016) Evaluation of the Illumina® Beta Version ForenSeqTM DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.09.009
Clayton TM, Whitaker JP, Sparkes R, Gill P (1998) Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00175-8
Coble MD, Bright JA (2019) Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview. Forensic Sci Int Genet 38:219–224
Coble MD, Buckleton J, Butler JM et al (2016) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the validation of software programs performing biostatistical calculations for forensic genetics applications. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.002
Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G et al (1998a) A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72117-3
Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G et al (1998b) A model for case assessment and interpretation. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72099-4
Curran JM, Triggs CM, Buckleton J, Weir BS (1999) Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs12028j
Devlin B (1993) Forensic inference from genetic markers. Stat Methods Med Res 2:241–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029300200304
Devlin B, Risch N, Roeder K (1990) No excess of homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting. Science (80-). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2205919
Dror IE, Hampikian G (2011) Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
Evett IW (1995) Avoiding the transposed conditional. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(95)72645-4
Evett IW, Gill P (1991) A discussion of the robustness of methods for assessing the evidential value of DNA single locus profiles in crime investigations. Electrophoresis. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150120220
Evett IW, Pinchin R (1991) DNA single locus profiles: tests for the robustness of statistical procedures within the context of forensic science. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01369583
Evett IW, Scranage J, Pinchin R (1993) An illustration of the advantages of efficient statistical methods for RFLP analysis in forensic science. Am J Hum Genet 52(3):498–505
Evett IW, Gill PD, Lambert JA (1998) Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs16091j
Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA, McCrossan S (2000) The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. Sci Justice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(00)71993-9
Foreman LA, Evett IW (2001) Statistical analyses to support forensic interpretation for a new ten-locus STR profiling system. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140000138
Foreman LA, Smith AFM, Evett IW (1997) Bayesian analysis of DNA profiling data in forensic identification applications. J R Stat Soc Ser A. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985x.00074
Fukshansky N, Bär W (2000) Biostatistics for mixed stains: the case of tested relatives of a non-tested suspect. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140000155
Fung WK, Hu YQ (2002) The statistical evaluation of DNA mixtures with contributors from different ethnic groups. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140100256
Geddes L (2010) Fallible DNA evidence can mean prison or freedom. New Scientist 206(2773):18–19
Gill P (2002) Role of short tandem repeat DNA in forensic casework in the UK – past, present, and future perspectives. BioTechniques 32:366
Gill P, Evett I (1995) Population genetics of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Genetica 96:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441153
Gill P, Werrett DJ (1990) Interpretation of DNA profiles using a computerised database. Electrophoresis. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150110516
Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ (1985) Forensic application of DNA “fingerprints”. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/318577a0
Gill P, Sparkes B, Buckleton JS (1998) Interpretation of simple mixtures of when artefacts such as stutters are present – with special reference to multiplex STRs used by the Forensic Science Service. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00094-2
Gill P, Haned H, Bleka O et al (2015) Genotyping and interpretation of STR-DNA: low-template, mixtures and database matches – Twenty years of research and development. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.014
Gill P, Hicks T, Butler JM et al (2018) Forensic Science International : Genetics DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics : assessing the value of forensic biological evidence – guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions Part I : evaluation of DNA pro fi li. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.003
Gosch A, Euteneuer J, Preuß-Wössner J, Courts C (2020) DNA transfer to firearms in alternative realistic handling scenarios. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102355
Hecht F (1989) The blooding. Am J Hum Genet 45(3):481–482
Hoffrage U, Lindsey S, Hertwig R, Gigerenzer G (2000) Communicating statistical information. Science (80-.)
Hwa HL, Wu MY, Chung WC et al (2019) Massively parallel sequencing analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures using the ForenSeqTM system in combination with EuroForMix software. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1961-y
Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Individual-specific “fingerprints” of human DNA. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/316076a0
Kokshoorn B, Blankers BJ, de Zoete J, Berger CEH (2017) Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: on propositions addressing the actor or the activity. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.029
Lambert JA, Evett IW, Scranage JK (1995) Large scale database experiments to assess the significance of matching DNA profiles. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845609
Leib H (2019) Annual report 2018. AIMS Electron Electr Eng 3:98–101. https://doi.org/10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.1.98
Lohmueller KE, Rudin N, Inman K (2014) Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler® and PowerPlex® 16 forensic STR typing systems. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.003
Ludeman MJ, Zhong C, Mulero JJ et al (2018) Developmental validation of GlobalFilerTM PCR amplification kit: a 6-dye multiplex assay designed for amplification of casework samples. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1817-5
Moretti TR, Moreno LI, Smerick JB et al (2016) Population data on the expanded CODIS core STR loci for eleven populations of significance for forensic DNA analyses in the United States. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.022
Moretti TR, Just RS, Kehl SC et al (2017) Internal validation of STRmixTM for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.004
Morton NE (1997) The forensic DNA endgame. Jurimetrics 37:477–494
Neckovic A, van Oorschot RAH, Szkuta B, Durdle A (2020) Investigation of direct and indirect transfer of microbiomes between individuals. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102212
Novroski NMM, King JL, Churchill JD et al (2016) Characterization of genetic sequence variation of 58 STR loci in four major population groups. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.007
Oldoni F, Podini D (2019) Forensic molecular biomarkers for mixture analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 41:107–119
Perlin MW, Szabady B (2001) Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15158j
Phillips C (2017) A genomic audit of newly-adopted autosomal STRs for forensic identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.011
Phipps M, Petricevic S (2007) The tendency of individuals to transfer DNA to handled items. Forensic Sci Int 168:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.010
Presciuttini S, Toni C, Alù M et al (2011) X-chromosome in Italy: a database of 29 STR markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.018
Ragazzo M, Carboni S, Caputo V et al (2020) Interpreting mixture profiles: comparison between precision ID globalfilerTM NGS STR panel v2 and traditional methods. Genes (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060591
Risch NJ, Devlin B (1992) On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints. Science (80-). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1738844
Sakurada K, Watanabe K, Akutsu T (2020) Current methods for body fluid identification related to sexual crime: focusing on saliva, semen, and vaginal fluid. 10(9):693. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090693
Sessa F, Salerno M, Bertozzi G et al (2019) Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: an experimental study. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46051-9
SWGDAM (2010) SWGDAM interpretation guidelines for autosomal STR typing SWGDAM interpretation guidelines for autosomal STR typing by forensic DNA testing laboratories. Website
SWGDAM (2015) Scientific working group on DNA analysis methods validation guidelines for the validation of probabilistic genotyping systems, pp 1–13. Availale at https://www.swgdam.org/publications
Taylor D, Curran J, Buckleton J (2018a) Likelihood ratio development for mixed Y-STR profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.006
Taylor D, Kokshoorn B, Biedermann A (2018b) Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: a review. Forensic Sci Int Genet 36:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7. PMID: 29929059
Thompson WC (1997) Accepting lower standards: the National Research Council’s Second report on forensic DNA evidence. Jurimetrics 37:405–424
van Oorschot RA, Jones MK (1997) DNA fingerprints from fingerprints. Nature 387:767. https://doi.org/10.1038/42838
Ventura Spagnolo E, Mondello C, Procaccianti S et al (2017) Allele frequencies distribution of 16 forensic STR loci in a Western Sicilian population sample. Egypt J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-017-0013-y
Vraneš M, König M, Cornelius S et al (2019) Development of the Investigator® 26plex QS Kit: a new multiplex PCR Kit for Global STR analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.174
Wang H, Zhu J, Zhou N et al (2015) NGS technology makes microhaplotype a potential forensic marker. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.093
Weir BS, Triggs CM, Starling L et al (1997) Interpreting DNA mixtures. J Forensic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs14100j
Wendt FR, Churchill JD, Novroski NMM et al (2016) Genetic analysis of the Yavapai Native Americans from West-Central Arizona using the Illumina MiSeq FGxTM forensic genomics system. Forensic Sci Int Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.008
Whitaker JP, Cotton EA, Gill P (2001) A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR® SGM PlusTM multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00557-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sessa, F., Salerno, M., Pomara, C. (2021). The Interpretation of Mixed DNA Samples. In: Dash, H.R., Shrivastava, P., Lorente, J.A. (eds) Handbook of DNA Profiling. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9364-2_47-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9364-2_47-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9364-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9364-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences