Abstract
Nutrient cycling is a vital process in the ecosystem by which movement and exchange of nutrients in available forms from the environment into living organisms and then subsequently are recycled back into the atmosphere. Chemical elements such as C, O, H, S, N, and P are necessary to live. These elements must be recycled for organisms to live and to sustain plant growth and yield. In this context, microbes in the soil play a dynamic role. They help to release mineral nutrients through matter organic decomposition and mineral recycling. These mineralized nutrients are then absorbed by plant roots with water and used to make new organic material. They are also crucial to maintain soil structure and soil quality for sustainable plant growth. Currently, most of the world’s soils are distinguished deficient in these nutrients, and there would be high demand for chemical fertilizers to meet the deficiency of nutrients. Synthetic chemical fertilizers are undoubtedly necessary for the healthy growth of plants. But, their injudicious application is also harmful to the environment and living beings. However, the entire range of microbes associated with plants and their potential to replace synthetic farm inputs has only recently started. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the potent soil microbes for efficient nutrient recycling and identify alternative eco-friendly options for reducing chemical fertilizer’s use and its adverse impacts. In this scenario, maintaining soil fertility and crop productivity using natural microbial diversity could be the best approach for enhancing the bioavailability of nutrients and improving soil health.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1.1 Introduction
Over the last decades, the global demand for food products has increased dramatically (Elferink and Schierhorn 2016). Global food demand is projected to enhance by 59–98% by 2050. In developing nations, food demand is also increasing, where the expansion of croplands resources is limited. In this scenario, for enhancing food production from existing land is hard to contribute to meet such an essential requirement (Bargaz et al. 2018). In order to address this problem, there is a need to enhance agricultural production sustainably through the use of efficient agro-bioresources, whereas soil microbial diversity can play an important role and also help to mitigate many problems associated with soil fertility, abiotic stress, insect pests, and diseases (Tilman et al. 2011; Utuk and Daniel 2015; Timmusk et al. 2017).
Soil serves as a plant growth medium and a major source of plant nutrients for quality food production. Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and iron (Fe) are essential nutrients in crop production. Since most of the world’s soils are known to lack in these nutrients, and there would be a high demand for chemical fertilizers to meet the deficiency of nutrients. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore the potential of soil microbes for proper nutrient recycling and to recognize alternative, sustainable, environment-friendly options for reducing the use and impacts of synthetic fertilizers (Malav et al. 2015). In this scenario, maintaining soil fertility and crop productivity through the use of natural microbial diversity could be a well-off approach for enhancing the bioavailability of nutrients and increasing soil health (Singh et al. 2015; Timmusk et al. 2017; Bargaz et al. 2018; Rana et al. 2020a, b).
Soils are regarded as home to a wide range of macro- and microorganisms of rhizospheric nature. Soil microbe diversity is the fundamental key component in regulating biogeochemical cycles (e.g., C, N, P, and many more). Biogeochemical cycling affects soil ecosystems, composition, and functions as well as the capacity of soils to provide readily available nutrients to plants and animals by converting dead organic matter into various nutrient forms and many auxiliary services to living beings (Aislabie et al. 2013). Biofertilizers and organic manure could be regarded as a better choice in the crop integrated nutrient management approach (Chaer et al. 2011; Kour et al. 2020b).
In this integration, soil microbes such as bacteria, archaea, and fungi play various crucial roles. Though very little is acknowledged about the small creature that is accountable for countless soil mechanisms in natural and managed agro-ecosystems (Yadav and Sidhu 2016; Sahu et al. 2017). Soil microbes have an immense impact on relations between soil and plant and microbe and play a vital role in sustaining soil fertility (Yadav et al. 2020c). Nutrient cycling is the most significant of these relationships. This chapter explains the potential of soil microbes for proper nutrient recycling, including diversity, abundance, and distribution, and their role in nutrient cycling of soil microbe organisms.
1.2 Soil Health and Sustainability
Soil health is defined as functional ability within agro-ecosystem boundaries that support biological productivity, promote plant and animal fitness, and sustain environmental quality (Doran and Parkin 1994). Healthy soil functions are to resist erosion, support water, and nutrient cycling, inactivate toxic pollutants, suppress pathogens, maintain soil organic matter, and enhance overall system productivity and sustainability (Singh et al. 2015; Dubey 2016; Sahu et al. 2017). The soil health directly or indirectly impact plant health, environmental health, and food safety and quality (Singh et al. 2020a; Takoutsing et al. 2016). The soil serves as a biological filter for removing unwanted solids and gaseous constituents from air and water (Singer and Ewing 2000; Sahu et al. 2017). Healthy soils produce nutritious crops that, in turn, nourish humans and animals. Certainly, soil quality is directly linked with food quality and quantity. Maintaining healthy soil implies managing land sustainably (FAO 2015). Managing soil health is not only necessary for agricultural sustainability but also for ecosystem function. However, erosion, deforestation, and intensive agriculture have led to the degradation of many soils. As we know, soils constitute the foundation for sustainable agricultural development. Therefore, keeping healthy is essential to maintain food production for future generations.
1.3 Soil Quality
Soil quality is the capability of the soil to perform functions that are crucial to agriculture and the environment. Soil Science Society of America established soil quality as the ability of particular kind of soil to function, within a natural or managed ecosystem, to support plants and animals productivity, maintain or improve quality of water and air, and promote human health and habitation (Carter et al. 1997). Soil quality is not limited to agricultural lands although most soil quality work has been done in agrarian systems. It is a blend of inherent and dynamic soil properties. Soil properties include soil organic matter, nutrient, soil structure, water infiltration rate, bulk density, and water holding capacity. Soil properties can change over months and years in response to land use.
Soil properties are dynamic and changed, depending on land management practices and the inherent properties of parental material (rocks). The soil quality is necessary for the integrity of ecosystems and sustainably supports human and animal health, plant growth (Pankhurst and Doube 1997). Declining soil quality is a vital concern worldwide (Singer and Ewing 2000). Healthy soils improve crop yields, drought and flood tolerance, and air and water quality and balance a range of other functions to satisfy the demands of both farmers and the community. Soil quality is a critical part and basic features of sustainable agro-ecosystem management, similar to water and air quality. The relationship between soil quality, environmental quality, and agricultural sustainability is shown in Fig. 1.1.
1.4 Soil Quality Indicators
Soil quality indicators are used to assess and identify soil properties that are responsive to management, affect, or associated with environmental consequences. There are three primary levels of soil indicators: chemical, physical, and biological. Soil quality integrates all of these indicators. Table 1.1 below shows the relationship between indicator type and soil function. Organic matter or soil carbon is itself an indicator of soil quality (Doran and Parkin 1996). It further affects other indicators like soil aggregate-stability (physical), nutrient availability (chemical), and nutrient cycling (biological). Chemical indicators give knowledge about equilibrium within soil solution (water and nutrients) and exchange sites (clay particles, soil organic matter), plant health, nutritional demands of plant and soil communities, levels of soil contaminants, and their availability for uptake by plants and animals.
Physical indicators give knowledge about soil hydrologic properties, such as water retention, that affects the availability of water to plants. Some indicators are related to nutrient availability by their impact on rooting volume and aeration status. Other measures tell us about the erosional situation. Biological indicators provide information regarding the organisms that form the soil food web that is responsible for organic matter decomposition and cycling of nutrients. Soil microbial respiration indicates the soil’s ability to sustain plant growth (Doran and Parkin 1996).
1.5 Potential Role of Microbes for Soil Health
Soil microorganisms are responsible for making nutrient and organic matter cycling, in improving soil fertility, and leading to ecosystem productivity. Soil microbes form symbiotic relationships with plant roots (rhizobia, actinomycetes, mycorrhizal fungi, diazotrophic bacteria). They have the potential to improve nutrient mineralization and availability, produce plant growth hormones, and are antagonists of plant pests, fungi, or diseases (biocontrol agents). These organisms typically live in the soil, although, in some situations, they may help increase their communities by either inoculation or using several farm management techniques that improve their abundance and activity.
1.5.1 Soil as a Microbial Habitat
Soil represents a hospitable and dynamic habitat for microorganisms and is occupied by a wide range of microbial species. Microbes hold a fraction (<0.5%) of the total soil volume of topsoil. Usually, per gram of soil between one and ten million with a dominant number of bacteria and fungi is present (Fig. 1.2). The decomposition of organic residues and the cycling of nutrients is the significant role played by microbial species in soil (Pankhurst and Doube 1997). However, the soil also contains countless microorganisms capable of causing human disease (Rastegari et al. 2020b). Microbes are connected with the decay, and the nutrient cycling process is capable of sustaining and responding to quick changes in the environment. Hence, they rapidly adapt to environmental conditions, changes in microbial populations, and activities. Therefore, it can be considered as an excellent indicator of change in soil health (Singh et al. 2015; Sahu et al. 2017).
Soil microbes are classified as bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi, algae, and protozoa. The interactions of gases, water, organisms, and organic and inorganic constituents can be visualized in a per gram of soil (Fig. 1.3). Up to ten billion bacterial cells survive each gram of soil in and nearby plant roots, a sphere is known as the rhizosphere. Rhizobacteria are the most abundant group of soil microbes, both in absolute number and in diversity. They perform a vital role in nutrient cycling and decomposition of organic residues (Pankhurst and Doube 1997).
1.5.2 Soil Microbes and Agro-Ecosystem Stability
Ecosystem stability is an essential part of sustainability, where microbes play a critical role. Stability of equilibrium of any system has two components: (i) Resistance—the ability of the ecosystem to continue to function without any change when stressed by disturbance (ii) Resilience—the strength of the ecosystem to recover after disturbance (Odum 1989; Seybold et al. 1999). Soil is the junction between the air, water, minerals, and organisms and is performing various functions in the natural and agro-ecosystem that we call ecosystem services. Soils play an essential role in the entire natural ecological cycles—C, N, oxygen, water, and nutrient, and also provide benefits through their contribution in several unique processes called ecosystem services. Suggested practices to increase agro-ecosystem stability and function are given in Table 1.2. Soil microbial biodiversity reflects the variability among living microorganisms extending from the countless of invisible microbes to more familiar macro-fauna like earthworms and termites. Soil microbes play an essential role in agro-ecosystem stability, including rich biodiversity, healthy biological cycles, and soil microbial activity; consequently, they are contributing to the build-up of stable soil agro-ecosystem (Doran and Parkin 1996; Pankhurst and Doube 1997; Madsen 2005; Fortuna 2012; Yadav et al. 2020a, b).
1.5.3 Microorganisms and Soil Functions
Soil functions provide many benefits, such as cycling of nutrients, maintaining biodiversity and habitat, water relations, and maintaining water quality, acting as a biofilter and buffering providing physical stability and support crop production, and carbon sequestration. The summary of soil functions and its advantages for humans is given in Table 1.3. It is vital to maintain or improve soil quality over time and provide essential services in the face of disturbance, whether it is natural or human-induced. Typically, soil is not considered healthy if it is managed for short-term productivity at the cost of future degeneration (Doran and Parkin 1994).
The soil can store, govern the discharge and cycling of nutrients and elements. During these biogeochemical processes, similar to the water cycle, nutrients can be transformed into plant-available forms, contained in the soil, or even lost to air or water. Soil promotes the growth of a variety of plants, animals, and soil microorganisms, regularly by giving a different physical, chemical, and biological habitat. Soil acts as a filter to maintain water and air quality. Excess nutrients and toxic compounds can be degraded or otherwise made unavailable to plants and animals. Soil can maintain its porous structure to allow passage of air and water, resist erosive forces, and give a mechanism for plant roots. Soils also provide anchoring support for social structures (Doran and Parkin 1994).
Nutrient cycling and water regulation functions are natural soil processes occurring in each ecosystem. These functions provide various opportunities to humans for betterment of quality life, achieve sufficient food, quality water, flood control, and several more. Soil pollution can happen either because of anthropogenic activities or because of the natural process. However, it is mostly due to anthropogenic activities. A human can enhance the value of soil and take its maximum benefits because land management choices affect soil functions. Thus, it is necessary to realize what benefits we obtain from the earth. So we can have the greatness of achieving land management in a way that maintains essential soil functions. Several main benefits are long term or go beyond if the land is being managed properly. The community should respect the value of many off-site services and profits and the extent to which the landowner or community should pay to maintain these soil functions.
1.6 Role of Microorganisms in Nutrient Cycling
Soil microbes perform various functions in the pedosphere. They are essential in controlling biogeochemical processes (Table 1.4). The critical soil microbes regulated roles are: (i) soil organic matter formation and turnover which includes mineralization and carbon sequestration, (ii) nutrient cycling, (iii) disease dissemination and prevention, (iv) contaminant depletion, and (v) soil structure improvement (GHGs) (CO2, CH4, and N2O, etc.) are the by-products of metabolic redox reactions of carbon and nitrogen compounds in soils (Madsen 2008). Nitrogen fertilizer application and cultural practices in soil management can stimulate microbial processes such as nitrification, denitrification, and mineralization that play a major role in the emission of GHG (Pathak et al. 2003; Rastegari et al. 2020a).
The quantity and composition of the microbial biomass depend on soil characteristics and the abundance of carbon (C) for energy and cell metabolism. Soil carbon inputs varied in chemical composition and nutrient content. Carbon recycling, degradation, and microbial function frequently contribute to an increased organic matter, which leads to soil aggregation. Various ecosystems have different types of potential to support biota and sequestration of soils C in organic matter. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is the backbone of organic matter, which is the source of energy for most of the soil biota. Microbiological decomposition of crop residues and organic matter provides access to carbon and the nutrients needed by most living species. Mineralization of organic-nitrogen into ammonium and the use of nitrogenous chemical fertilizers containing ammonium promote nitrification with the help of nitrifying bacteria and archaea that turn ammonium into nitrate. Therefore, nitrate undergoes a further microbially induced stage, denitrification (Maier et al. 2009; Fortuna 2012).
The food web present in the soil consists of various groups of microbes and helps for nutrients transfers and flow between the biotic and abiotic components (Sylvia et al. 2005). Mesofauna (collembolan and mites) perform a prominent role in nutrient cycling by slicing stocks into smaller pieces and directly helping to enhance the surface area. It has greater exposure to microbes that are key to carbon cycling. All food webs include many trophic levels in a food chain. If organic carbon is derived from living animals, the term grazing is used. Soil microbes form an essential part of the detrital type of food chain because they obtain their organic carbon from dead substances. Elemental ratios of C:N:P:S relatively are constant in the biological systems and organisms. Those ratios and mass balance allow researchers to establish biochemical changes between species.
Most soil microbe members are chemo-heterotrophs, suggesting they receive carbon and energy by the oxidation of organic materials (Kumar et al. 2019b; Singh et al. 2020b). C-sequestration restricts the mineralization mechanism mediated by the CO2 producing chemo-heterotrophs. Mineralization process by-products are metabolites, heat, and CO2. CO2 production can minimize concentrations of O2 producing anoxic sites within micro-aggregates resulting in variation of micro-environments (Van Elsas et al. 2007; Sylvia et al. 2005). These microsites are habitats in which CO2 is converted by archaea known as methanogens into CH4 a GHG by anaerobic respiration. In neighboring microsites, methane can undergo oxidation into CO2 with the help of a group of bacteria known as methanotrophs.
Microbes play a vital role in nutrient cycling and organic substances decomposition. This transforms the natural materials into biomass or mineralizes them to CO2, water, and nutrients (Bloem et al. 1997; Pankhurst and Doube 1997; Malyan et al. 2019). Such effective microbes are also concerned with the production and oxidation of waste products, including organic industrial substances (Singh et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2019a). The functions of these productive rhizospheric organisms own the potential to have a useful test of soil sustainability. This attribute cannot be obtained with higher organism diversity analysis and physical/chemical tests. Microorganisms respond quickly to environmental changes; hence, they adapt quickly to ambient conditions. This adaptation makes it possible for microbial studies to differentiate in the assessment of soil health. Thus, improvements in soil biota communities and activities can be an excellent predictor of soil health (Singh et al. 2015; Sindhu et al. 2016).
Soil is a diverse environment for several life forms and provides vegetation with mechanical assistance from which nutrients are derived. Soil microbes regularly interact with each other; at times, these relationships are beneficial to both parties (mutualism), symbiotic, and competitive. It increases soil health because the “healthy” soil biota may fight against the “poor” ones and also contribute significantly by degrading organic compounds to make nutrients available. Thus, the similar basic soil structure in the different geographical regions is found to support different biocommunities. Soils have different texture due to the percentage contribution of sand, silt, and clay, and that includes a diversity of microhabitats that sustain a wide variety of microbes. The atmosphere within soil shows less oxygen content from the above-ground due to the utilization of the available O2 by soil biota and other metabolisms. Similarly, the concentration of CO2 in the soil is higher than the level at the above-ground due to the generation of it as a by-product of microbial reactions (Sarkar et al. 2017; Kumar et al. 2017).
Microbes’ reaction to environmental changes/stress is rapid relative to higher species, owing to their top surface to volume ratio. Those productive microbial communities may be regarded as soil architects (Rajendhran and Gunasekaran 2008). Several environmental functions, including plant growth, drinking water protection, or carbon sequestration, are strictly related to microbial service and its functional characteristics (Torsvik and Ovreas 2002; Lombard et al. 2011). A study on the development of abiotic and biotic interactions is very complex microbes function on a 3 μm scale and form biogeochemical soil interfaces (Totsche et al. 2010; Monier et al. 2011). Furthermore, most functional features, such as plant litter depletion or the formation of food web systems and nutrient cycling, are not the function of a single organism, but of closely associated microbial communities (Aneja et al. 2006; Sharma et al. 2012).
1.6.1 Organic Matter Decomposition
The decomposition of various forms of soil organic matter is one of the essential functions of soil biota. To make these organic compounds accessible to the autotrophic organisms, they must be processed into simple inorganic forms. Mineralization is the process of organic matter conversion into simpler inorganic forms, which is rendered primarily soil microbes, mostly fungus and bacteria (Gupta and Germida 1988; Xu et al. 2015). The organic substances that are brought into the soil are divided into three groups: the easily decomposable, moderately decomposable, and difficult to degrade, distinctly attached by various microbiota types. The consequence of microbial mineralization is, on the one hand, the release of energy, water, gases, etc., and, on the other, the creation of complex amorphous material humus through the process of humification.
1.6.2 Carbon Cycling
The balance between respiration and photosynthesis dominates terrestrial carbon cycling. Carbon is transferred into the soil from the atmosphere by autotrophic carbon-fixing species, primarily photosynthetic crop/plants and also photo- and chemoautotrophic microorganisms, which synthesize carbon dioxide (CO2) in organic matter. Respiration is the primary process behind the transfer of carbon back to the atmosphere with the help of both autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms. The reverse pathway involves the decomposition of organic matter by heterotrophic carbon consuming bacteria, which use plant, animal, or microbial origin carbon as a metabolism base, retaining part of few carbons in their biomass and adding the remainder back into the environment as metabolites or as CO2 (Gougoulias et al. 2014).
1.6.3 Nitrogen Cycle
All organisms require nitrogen because the protein and nucleic acids are essential elements. Animals derive nitrogen from organic sources, whereas plants derive inorganic nitrogen sources like NH4+ and NO3− (Schimel and Bennett 2004). Nitrogen fixation is the reduction of atmospheric N2 gas to NH4+. Nitrogen fixation is the only natural mechanism by which new nitrogen reaches the biosphere, and is thus necessary for the ecosystem’s functioning. The enzyme nitrogenase catalyzes N-fixation. The ammonium generated by N-fixation is assimilated into amino acids and then converted into proteins. Under nitrogen-scarce conditions, N-fixing microorganisms have an advantage. Nitrogen fixation is carried out by free-living microorganisms such as Azotobacter, Burkholderia, Clostridium, and few methanogens, some of which may be kept associated with the rhizosphere of crops plants, and bacteria that shows symbiotic relationships with plants like Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Frankia (Maier et al. 2009; Fortuna 2012; Santi et al. 2013). The nitrogen-fixing microbes have been reported from different habitats and host worldwide belonging to different genera of Arthrobacter, Azoarcus, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Gluconoacetobacter, Herbaspirillum, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Serratia (Subrahmanyam et al. 2020; Suman et al. 2016; Yadav 2020).
Exudates from crop plants provide some of the energy needed to fasten nitrogen fixation. In agricultural soils, a significant source of N is rhizobia, which forms root nodules in symbiotic relationships with introduced legumes such as clover, lucerne, or lotus. Symbiotic interaction N-fixation levels are sometimes two to three orders of magnitude higher than free-living bacteria in the soil. Ammonia or ammonium ions are oxidized to nitrite and then to nitrate during nitrification. The two steps in nitrification—first are the formation of nitrite and then nitrate—are carried out by two distinct microbes. In soils, ammonia oxidation to nitrite is conducted by bacteria such as Nitrosospira and Nitrosomonas, while bacteria such as Nitrobacter and Nitrospira oxidize nitrite to nitrate. Nitrifying microbes utilize the energy derived from nitrification to assimilate CO2. Nitrification is especially vital in soils as the degradation of nitrite and nitrate ions from ammonium to nitrite shifts their charge from positive into negative.
1.6.4 Siderophores Production
Iron is a vital nutrient, and part of many compounds that regulate and promote plant growth and development. In the soil, naturally, iron is present as a ferric ion (Fe3+), which is too low to promote and facilitate soil microbial growth. It has been reported that some bacteria possess the ability to assimilate unavailable iron to overcome iron stress by producing ferric-specific ligands, referred to as siderophores, which are usually of low molecular weight (400–10,000) (Neiland and Nakamura 1997). Such microorganisms or bacteria are real iron scavengers as they have a high affinity for iron (Fe3+) chelators that transfer iron to bacterial cells (Leong 1986). Soil microorganisms, especially rhizobacteria, are of great interest for siderophore production. Under iron stress conditions, these bacteria have a high chelating affinity for Fe3+ than Fe2+ ions, and Fe3+ions are transferred to bacterial cells (Neiland 1995). Recent studies have indicated that biological control of different phytopathogenic organisms could be achieved using siderophore producing microorganism such as Alcaligenes, Bacillus, Clavibacter, Curtobacterium, Flavobacterium, Kluyvera, Microbacterium, and Pseudomonas (Verma et al. 2016, 2017; Yadav et al. 2017a).
1.6.5 Hormones Production
Microbial synthesis of the phytohormone has been known for a long time. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is a group of microorganisms that colonize several plant species’ rhizosphere and roots. They confer beneficial effects to plants by a variety of mechanisms, including indole-3-acetic acid synthesis of phytohormone auxin (IAA), which is essential for plant growth (Patten and Glick 1996; Kour et al. 2020a; Rana et al. 2020a, b). Eighty percent of microorganisms isolated from the rhizosphere of various crops have the potential to synthesize and release IAA as secondary metabolites (Patten and Glick 1996; Yadav et al. 2017b). The most common phytohormone produced by PGPR is indole-3-acetic acid, which participates in root growth and increases root surface area, thereby enabling plants to absorb more nutrients from the soil. Gibberellins associated with plant extension, mainly stem tissue, have been reported to be produced by Bacillus pumilus and B. licheniformis in the form of gibberellic acid. The phytohormone-producing rhizospheric microbes, when inoculated to crops, help plant growth promotion, enhance yield, and increase soil fertility for sustainable agriculture (Kumar et al. 2016; Singh and Yadav 2020; Yadav et al. 2018b).
1.6.6 Phosphate Solubilization
Phosphorus, after nitrogen, holds a second essential role in various critical processes in plant growth and development, including the division of cells, photosynthesis, and decomposition of sugar, energy, and nutrient conversion in a crop plant. Plants utilize phosphate ion the form of phosphate anions, but phosphate anions are incredibly reactive and get immobilized through precipitation with cations present in the soil such as Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, and Al3+. Rhizobacteria help in the decomposition of organic compounds and make phosphorus available by the action of minerals and acids released by soil bacteria. Phosphorus mineralization is greatly affected by the microbial community, and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria such as species of Bacillus and Paenibacillus have been applied to soils to enhance the phosphorus status of plants specifically. Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Rhizobium are the most potent phosphate solubilizers in the cropping system (Rodríguez and Fraga 1999; Kour et al. 2019).
Possible mechanisms for solubilization from organically bound phosphate involve either enzymes, namely C-P lyase, nonspecific phosphatases, and phytases. However, most of the bacterial genera solubilize phosphate through the production of organic acids such as gluconate, ketogluconate, acetate, lactate, oxalate, tartrate, succinate, citrate, and glycolate (Yadav et al. 2015). The rhizospheric phosphate utilizing bacteria could be a promising source for plant growth-promoting agent in agriculture (Rana et al. 2019; Yadav et al. 2018a). The rhizospheric phosphorus-solubilizing microbiomes may be used for mitigation of abiotic stress in plants such as high/low temperatures, alkaline/acidic, drought, and saline environments (Kour et al. 2018, 2019; Kumar et al. 2019c).
1.6.7 Manganese (Mn) Solubilizers
Redox condition and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) are two significant factors that influence the availability of Mn in the rhizosphere. Some rhizosphere bacteria such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Geobacter can reduce oxidized Mn4+ to Mn2+ form, which is metabolically useful for crops (Wani et al. 2015). Consequently, Mn-reducer function in the rhizosphere is strongly favored. Products of organic matter can also help reduce Mn (Hue et al. 2014). Gaeumannomyces graminis is also an Mn oxidizer that impairs root lignification at infection sites. Effective rhizosphere Mn reducers like Pseudomonas sp. could have beneficial effects on plant nutrition and also help in biocontrol of pathogens. In comparison, Mn oxidization by rhizosphere bacteria supports plant growth in flooded soils where the abundance of Mn2+ can be high.
1.6.8 Iron Solubilizers
Iron dynamics in the rhizosphere is almost similar to that of manganese (Mn). Fe in the soil is a part of the structure of insoluble minerals Goethite (FeOOH) or hematite, in oxidized forms Fe3+. Rhizosphere bacteria, such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Geobacter, Alcaligenes, Clostridium, and Enterobacter, can reduce oxidized Fe3+ to reduced Fe2+ form required by crop plants. Electrons and hydrogen ions are available in the rhizosphere, and consequently, Fe is diminished. However, it can be reprecipitated (Kaur et al. 2020; Wani et al. 2015).
1.6.9 Soil Enzymes
Soil enzymes act as a booster in the redox reaction through which plant residues decompose and make nutrients available. The material on that soil enzyme that has worked is considered the substrate. The enzymatic reaction releases a product, which may be a substrate-containing nutrient. There are so many sources of enzymes in the soil, such as living and dead microorganisms, soil animals, plant roots, and plant residues. Enzymes that are stable in the soil matrix retained or form complexes with humus, clay, and humus-clay compounds, which are no longer associated with sustainable cells. Stabilized enzymes contribute 40–60% of the total enzyme activity. It is believed that 40–60% of enzyme activity can come from stabilized enzymes. Thus, behavior is not strongly associated with microbial biomass or respiration. Enzyme activity is then the combined effect of long-term microbial development and viable sampling population activity.
Enzymes respond to changes in soil management long before more changes in soil quality indicators can be identified. Soil enzymes play a crucial part in the decomposition of organic matter and nutrient cycling (Table 1.5). There is no substantial evidence, apart from phosphatase activity, that directly relates enzyme activity to nutrient availability or crop production. The relation may be indirect because nutrient mineralization is achieved with the contribution of enzyme activity to plant-available sources. Limited enzymatic activity (e.g., pesticide degrading enzymes) may contribute to dangerous chemical accumulation for the environment. Many of these toxic chemicals can also impede soil enzymatic activity.
Apart from these, as we know, plant growth and yield depend on the availability of nutrients and their efficient management. Therefore, it is essential to adopt the 4R Nutrient Stewardship concept of right nutrient application (i) Right source, (ii) Right rate, (iii) Right time, and (iv) Right place (Johnston and Bruulsema 2014). This concept integrates soil health with sustainable and precision farming practices. Right source means matching the source of the nutrient to the crop need and soil properties. A significant part of the source is balanced between the various nutrients, a considerable challenge globally in improving nutrient use efficiency. The right amount means balancing the nutrients added to the need for the seed as basic as that.
The applications of too much fertilizer contributes to excess soil nutrients and environmental degradation. Ultimately, striking a balance between the crop needs, environmental conditions, and the farmer’s economic situation is required. Here, microbial biofertilizers can play a vital role in such cases. The right timing ensures that fertilizer nutrients are made available for the crop when needed. Efficiency in nutrient usage can be significantly improved when its supply is matched with crop demand. The right position means attempting to preserve nutrients so crops can use them. This is a question that presents the most significant challenge in smallholder farming systems, where most fertilizers are distributed, and in many cases, without incorporation (Johnston and Bruulsema 2014). Adaptation of 4R Nutrient Stewardship concept of right nutrient application with the potential soil microbes helps to better nutrient recycling and long-term sustainability goal of our agriculture production system.
1.7 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
In soil processes, including nutrient cycling, soil organisms and their products play a crucial role. These mechanisms are essential for agriculture as well as water, air, and habitat quality protection. Agriculture is currently facing excessive pressure due to population development and related rises in urbanization, resource extraction, etc. However, cultural practices are influenced by the microbial activities. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the potential role of soil microbes for proper nutrient recycling and its impacts on soil health.
Furthermore, expanding our core knowledge regarding diversity and function of soil microbial component is a necessary task to alleviate the harmful effects of soil degradation. Research focusing more on the credentials of innovative microbial diversity in the soil remains essential practices. In the future, that would play a more critical role favorably for enhancing plant growth and yield as well as contribute towards a more environment-friendly alternative to support sustainable development.
References
Aislabie J, Deslippe JR, Dymond J (2013) Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. In: Ecosystem services in New Zealand—conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand, pp 143–161
Aneja M, Sharma S, Schloter M, Munch JC (2006) Microbial degradation of beech litter—the influence of soil type, litter quality on the structure and function of microbial populations 15 involved in the turnover process. Microb Ecol 52:127–135
Bargaz A, Lyamlouli K, Chtouki M, Zeroual Y, Dhiba D (2018) Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizer efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system. Front Microbiol 9:1606–1606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01606
Bloem J, De Ruiter PC, Bouwman LA (1997) Soil food webs and nutrient cycling in agroecosystems. In: van Elsas JD (ed) Modern soil microbiology. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 245–278
Carter MR, Gregorich EG, Anderson JW, Doran JW, Janzen HH, Pierce FJ (1997) Concepts of soil quality and significance. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality crop production ecosystem health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–19
Chaer GM, Resende AS, Campello EFC, de Faria SM, Boddey RM (2011) Nitrogen-fixing legume tree species for the reclamation of severely degraded lands in Brazil. Tree Physiol 31(2):139–149
Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA, Madison, pp 3–21
Doran JW, Parkin TB (1996) Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA, Inc., Madison, WI
Dubey RK (2016) Exploring rhizospheric interactions for agricultural sustainability, the need of integrative research on multi-trophic interactions. J Clean Prod 115:362–365
Elferink M, Schierhorn F (2016) Global demand for food is rising. Can we meet it? Harv Bus Rev 7:2016
FAO (2015) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Healthy soils are the basis for healthy food production. http://www.fao.org/soils-2015/news/news-detail/en/c/277682/
Fortuna A (2012) The soil biota. Nat Educ Knowl 3(10):1
Gougoulias C, Clark JM, Shaw LJ (2014) The role of soil microbes in the global C-cycle: tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived C for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. J Sci Food Agric 94(12):2362–2371
Gupta VSSR, Germida JJ (1988) Distribution of microbial biomass and its activity in different soil aggregate size calluses affected by cultivation. Soil Biol Biochem 2(6):777–786
Hue NV, Vega S, Silva J (2014) Manganese toxicity in a Hawaiian Oxisol affected by soil pH and organic amendments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(1):153–160
Johnston AM, Bruulsema TW (2014) 4R nutrient stewardship for improved nutrient use efficiency. Procedia Eng 83:365–370
Kaur T, Devi R, Rana KL, Kour D, Yadav AN (2019) Microbes with multifarious plant growth promoting attributes for sustainable agriculture. EU Voice 5:11–13
Kaur T, Rana KL, Kour D, Sheikh I, Yadav N, Yadav AN et al (2020) Microbe-mediated biofortification for micronutrients: present status and future challenges. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (eds) Trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: perspectives for human health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820528-0.00002-8
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN (2018) Drought stress in plants and their mitigation by soil microbiomes. EU Voice 4:29–30
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN, Sheikh I, Kumar V, Dhaliwal HS et al (2020a) Amelioration of drought stress in Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) by P-solubilizing drought-tolerant microbes with multifarious plant growth promoting attributes. Environ Sustain 3:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-020-00094-1
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Kumar M, Kumar V et al (2020b) Microbial biofertilizers: bioresources and eco-friendly technologies for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 23:101487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101487
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav N, Yadav AN, Kumar A, Meena VS et al (2019) Rhizospheric microbiomes: biodiversity, mechanisms of plant growth promotion, and biotechnological applications for sustainable agriculture. In: Kumar A, Meena VS (eds) Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria for agricultural sustainability: from theory to practices. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 19–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7553-8_2
Kumar A, Chaturvedi AK, Yadav K, Arunkumar KP, Malyan SK, Raja P et al (2019a) Fungal phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated resources: current scenario and future prospects. In: Yadav AN, Singh S, Mishra S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi, Perspective for sustainable environments, vol 3. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_18
Kumar A, Maurya BR, Raghuwanshi R, Meena VS, Islam MT (2017) Co-inoculation with Enterobacter and Rhizobacteria on yield and nutrient uptake by wheat in the alluvial soil under Indo-Gangetic plain of India. J Plant Growth Regul 36(3):608–617
Kumar M, Kour D, Yadav AN, Saxena R, Rai PK, Jyoti A et al (2019b) Biodiversity of methylotrophic microbial communities and their potential role in mitigation of abiotic stresses in plants. Biologia 74:287–308. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00190-6
Kumar V, Joshi S, Pant NC, Sangwan P, Yadav AN, Saxena A et al (2019c) Molecular approaches for combating multiple abiotic stresses in crops of arid and semi-arid region. In: Singh SP, Upadhyay SK, Pandey A, Kumar S (eds) Molecular approaches in plant biology and environmental challenges. Springer, Singapore, pp 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0690-1_8
Kumar V, Yadav AN, Saxena A, Sangwan P, Dhaliwal HS (2016) Unravelling rhizospheric diversity and potential of phytase producing microbes. SM J Biol 2:1009
Leong J (1986) Siderophores: their biochemistry and possible role in the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 24:187–209
Lombard N, Prestat E, Elsas JD, Simonet P (2011) Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78(1):31–49
Madsen EL (2005) Identifying microorganisms responsible for ecologically critical biogeochemical processes. Nat Rev Microbiol 3(5):439
Madsen EL (2008) Microbial biogeochemistry: a grand synthesis in environmental microbiology: from genomes to biogeochemistry. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, pp 281–299
Maier RM, Pepper IL, Gerba CP (2009) Environmental microbiology, vol 397. Academic Press, Burlington, MA
Malav LC, Khan SA, Gupta N (2015) Impacts of biogas slurry application on soil environment, yield and nutritional quality of baby corn. Soc Plant Res, 74
Malyan SK, Kumar A, Baram S, Kumar J, Singh S, Kumar SS et al (2019) Role of fungi in climate change abatement through carbon sequestration. In: Yadav AN, Singh S, Mishra S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi, Perspective for sustainable environments, vol 3. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_11
Monier J-M, Demanèche S, Delmont TO, Mathieu A, Vogel TM, Simonet P (2011) Metagenomic exploration of antibiotic resistance in soil. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.010
Neiland JB (1995) Siderophore: structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds. J Biol Chem 270:26723–26726
Neiland JB, Nakamura K (1997) Detection, determination, isolation, characterization, and regulation of microbial iron chelates. In: Winkelmann G (ed) Handbook of microbial iron chelates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–14
Odum EP (1989) Ecology and our endangered life support systems. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
Pankhurst CE, Doube BM (1997) Biological indicators of soil health: a synthesis. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 419–435
Pathak H, Bhatia A, Prasad S, Singh S, Kumar S, Jain MC, Singh P (2003) Effect of DCD, FYM, and moisture regime on nitrous oxide emission from an Alluvial soil in rice-wheat cropping system. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 51(2):139–145
Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220
Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P (2008) Strategies for accessing soil metagenome for desired applications. Biotechnol Adv 26(6):576–590
Rana KL, Kour D, Kaur T, Devi R, Yadav AN, Yadav N et al (2020a) Endophytic microbes: biodiversity, plant growth-promoting mechanisms and potential applications for agricultural sustainability. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-020-01429-y
Rana KL, Kour D, Kaur T, Sheikh I, Yadav AN, Kumar V et al (2020b) Endophytic microbes from diverse wheat genotypes and their potential biotechnological applications in plant growth promotion and nutrient uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-020-01168-0
Rana KL, Kour D, Sheikh I, Dhiman A, Yadav N, Yadav AN et al (2019) Endophytic fungi: biodiversity, ecological significance and potential industrial applications. In: Yadav AN, Mishra S, Singh S, Gupta A (eds) Recent advancement in white biotechnology through fungi, Diversity and enzymes perspectives, vol 1. Springer, Cham, pp 1–62
Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (2020a) New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Trends of Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture and Biomedicine Systems: Diversity and Functional Perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (2020b) New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Trends of Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture and Biomedicine Systems: Perspectives for Human Health. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Rodríguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339
Sahu N, Vasu D, Sahu A, Lal N, Singh SK (2017) Strength of microbes in nutrient cycling: a key to soil health. In: Meena VS, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A (eds) Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture, Plant-soil-microbe nexus, vol I. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5589-8_4
Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111(5):743–767
Sarkar A, Saha M, Meena VS (2017) Plant beneficial Rhizospheric microbes (PBRMs): prospects for increasing productivity and sustaining the resilience of soil fertility. In: Meena VS, Mishra PK, Bisht JK, Pattanayak A (eds) Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture, Plant-soil-microbe nexus, vol I. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5589-8_1
Schimel JP, Bennett J (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecol 85:591–602
Seybold CA, Herrick JE, Brejda JJ (1999) Soil resilience: a fundamental component of soil quality. Soil Sci 164(4):224–234
Sharma S, Mehta R, Gupta R, Schloter M (2012) Improved protocol for the extraction of 5 bacterial mRNA from soils. J Microbiol Methods 91:62–64
Sindhu SS, Phour M, Sehrawat A (2016) K-solubilizing microorganisms (KSM) and its effect on plant growth improvement. In: Meenav VS et al (eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, pp 171–185
Singer MJ, Ewing S (2000) Soil quality. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp G271–G298
Singh A, Kumari R, Yadav AN, Mishra S, Sachan A, Sachan SG (2020a) Tiny microbes, big yields: microorganisms for enhancing food crop production sustainable development. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N (eds) Trends of microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture and biomedicine systems: diversity and functional perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00001-4
Singh B, Boukhris I, Pragya, Kumar V, Yadav AN, Farhat-Khemakhem A et al (2020b) Contribution of microbial phytases in improving plants growth and nutrition: a review. Pedosphere 30:295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60010-8
Singh J, Yadav AN (2020) Natural bioactive products in sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore
Singh JS, Kumar A, Rai AN, Singh DP (2016) Cyanobacteria: a precious bioresource in agriculture, ecosystem, and environmental sustainability. Front Microbiol 7:529
Singh NP, Singh RK, Meena VS, Meena RK (2015) Can we use maize (Zea mays) rhizobacteria as plant growth promoter? Vegetos 28(1):8699
Subrahmanyam G, Kumar A, Sandilya SP, Chutia M, Yadav AN (2020) Diversity, plant growth promoting attributes, and agricultural applications of rhizospheric microbes. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38453-1_1
Suman A, Yadav AN, Verma P (2016) Endophytic microbes in crops: diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture. In: Singh D, Abhilash P, Prabha R (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity, research perspectives. Springer-Verlag, New Delhi, pp 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2647-5_7
Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DA (2005) Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Takoutsing B, Weber J, Aynekulu E, Martín JAR, Shepherd K, Sila A, Tchoundjeu Z, Diby L (2016) Assessment of soil health indicators for sustainable production of maize in smallholder farming systems in the highlands of Cameroon. Geoderma 276:64–73
Tilman D, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(50):20260–20264
Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson AC (2017) Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 8:49
Torsvik V, Ovreas L (2002) Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5(3):240–245
Totsche KU, Rennert T, Gerzabek MH, Kogel-Knabner I, Smalla K, Spiteller M, Vogel HJ (2010) Biogeochemical interfaces in soil: the interdisciplinary challenge for soil science. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173:88–99
Utuk IO, Daniel EE (2015) Land degradation: a threat to food security: a global assessment. J Environ Earth Sci 5(8):13–21
Van Elsas JD, Jansson JK, Trevors JT (2007) Modern soil microbiology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York, NY
Verma P, Yadav AN, Khannam KS, Kumar S, Saxena AK, Suman A (2016) Molecular diversity and multifarious plant growth promoting attributes of Bacilli associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere from six diverse agro-ecological zones of India. J Basic Microbiol 56:44–58
Verma P, Yadav AN, Kumar V, Singh DP, Saxena AK (2017) Beneficial plant-microbes interactions: biodiversity of microbes from diverse extreme environments and its impact for crop improvement. In: Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R (eds) Plant-microbe interactions in agro-ecological perspectives, Microbial interactions and agro-ecological impacts, vol 2. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 543–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6593-4_22
Wani FS, Ahmad L, Ali T, Mushtaq A (2015) Role of microorganisms in nutrient mobilization and soil health—a review. J Pure Appl Microbiol 9:1401–1410
Xu Z, Yu G, Zhang X, Ge J, He N, Wang Q, Wang D (2015) The variations in soil microbial communities, enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 86:19–29
Yadav AN (2020) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture: current research and future challenges. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (eds) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38453-1_16
Yadav AN, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kumar V, Sugitha T, Singh B et al (2017a) Beneficial microbiomes: biodiversity and potential biotechnological applications for sustainable agriculture and human health. J Appl Biol Biotechnol 5:45–57
Yadav AN, Kumar V, Prasad R, Saxena AK, Dhaliwal HS (2018a) Microbiome in crops: diversity, distribution and potential role in crops improvements. In: Prasad R, Gill SS, Tuteja N (eds) Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, Los Angeles, pp 305–332
Yadav AN, Rastegari AA, Yadav N, Kour D (2020a) Advances in plant microbiome and sustainable agriculture: diversity and biotechnological applications. Springer, Singapore
Yadav AN, Rastegari AA, Yadav N, Kour D (2020b) Advances in plant microbiome and sustainable agriculture: functional annotation and future challenges. Springer, Singapore
Yadav AN, Sharma D, Gulati S, Singh S, Dey R, Pal KK et al (2015) Haloarchaea endowed with phosphorus solubilization attribute implicated in phosphorus cycle. Sci Rep 5:12293
Yadav AN, Singh J, Rastegari AA, Yadav N (2020c) Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Yadav AN, Verma P, Kumar S, Kumar V, Kumar M, Singh BP et al. (2018b) Actinobacteria from rhizosphere: molecular diversity, distributions and potential biotechnological applications. In: Singh B, Gupta V, Passari A (eds) New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering.Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63994-3.00002-3
Yadav AN, Verma P, Singh B, Chauhan VS, Suman A, Saxena AK (2017b) Plant growth promoting bacteria: biodiversity and multifunctional attributes for sustainable agriculture. Adv Biotechnol Microbiol 5:1–16
Yadav BK, Sidhu AS (2016) Dynamics of K and their bioavailability for plant nutrition. In: Meena VS et al (eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi, pp 187–201
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research for providing facilities and financial support to undertake these investigations. There are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prasad, S. et al. (2021). Soil Microbiomes for Healthy Nutrient Recycling. In: Yadav, A.N., Singh, J., Singh, C., Yadav, N. (eds) Current Trends in Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture . Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6949-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6948-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6949-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)