Abstract
The human body can be viewed as an organism consisting of a variety of cellular and non-cellular materials interacting in a highly ordered manner. Its complex and hierarchical nature inspires the multi-level recapitulation of the human body in order to gain insights into the inner workings of life. While traditional cell culture models have led to new insights into the cellular microenvironment and biological control in vivo, deeper understanding of biological systems and human pathophysiology requires the development of novel model systems that allow for analysis of complex internal and external interactions within the cellular microenvironment in a more relevant organ context. Engineering organ-on-chip systems offers an unprecedented opportunity to unravel the complex and hierarchical nature of human organs. In this chapter, we first highlight the advances in microfluidic platforms that enable engineering of the cellular microenvironment and the transition from cells-on-chips to organs-on-chips. Then, we introduce the key features of the emerging organs-on-chips and their proof-of-concept applications in biomedical research. We also discuss the challenges and future outlooks of this state-of-the-art technology.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Bioinspired materials
- Microfluidics
- Organ-on-chip
- Cellular microenvironment
- Disease modeling
- Drug testing
13.1 Introduction
Appropriate model systems drive the development of biological and biomedical research. These model systems seek to recapitulate human physiology and pathology from the molecular level to the cellular, tissue and organ levels, thus providing insights into disease etiology, diagnostic therapeutics and disease prevention. In vivo, the body can be viewed as a variety of cellular and non-cellular materials interacting in a highly ordered manner. The complex and hierarchical nature of all living things inspires the multi-level recapitulation of the human body and development of biological model systems consisting of multiple cell types, with internal (cell-cell, cell-matrix) and/or external (e.g. cell-environment) interactions in a more relevant organ and multi-organ context.
Conventionally, animal models are often used to closely recapitulate human physiology in a variety of biomedical research areas, but they fail to faithfully mimic human responses due to the presence of confounding variables and differences between animal and human biology. It is also quite difficult to carry out real-time observation, utilization and throughput assays in animal models. While simplistic models, such as two dimensional (2D) monocultures of cells in a Petri-dish, have their merits to study the biological process of specific cell types, these formats often lack cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions that are necessary to maintain and define the specific phenotypes of cells. They also fail to mimic the cellular functions and intercellular communication that is present in tissues or organs. While three-dimensional (3D) cell aggregates and spheroid cultures can improve the cellular functions to some extent, they still lack many features that are critical for sustaining organ development and function, such as spatiotemporal biochemical cues, vascular perfusion, mechanical cues or multiple cell co-cultures. Obviously, most current model systems are far from being able to fully reconstitute functions spanning cellular, tissue and organ levels, but it is crucial to develop such biological systems that can address specific scientific questions in biomedical research.
Considerable advances in microfabrication and microfluidics technology have expanded our ability to culture cells in a tightly controlled complex cellular microenvironment in a spatiotemporal manner, thus mimicking the tissue microenvironment in vivo. The microfluidic culture platform can provide living cells with continuously perfused medium in microchannels at the microscale [1,2,3,4,5]. Integration of microfabrication with microfluidics technologies that enable precise control of dynamic fluid flow has made it possible to create cellular microenvironments that present cells (e.g. human cell lines, primary cells or stem cells) with appropriate organ-relevant chemical gradients and dynamic mechanical cues. These new capabilities have provided an impetus for the development of alternative cell-based in vitro models, which better mimic the complex structures and functional complexity of living organs, termed organs-on-chips [6,7,8,9]. These organs-on-chips combine microfluidics with bioengineering and cell biology, allowing study of the diverse biological processes and physiopathology of the human body in ways that are not possible using animal models and conventional 2D or 3D cell culture systems.
In this chapter, we first introduce the microfluidic culture systems that can offer dynamic cell cultures with enhanced capabilities. Then, we introduce the design considerations and key components required for engineering the cellular microenvironment using microfluidic chips. We further summarize the emerging transition from cells-on-a-chip to organs-on-a-chip, and the proof-of–concept applications of engineered organ-on-chip devices. We also discuss the challenges and future perspectives of this state-of–the-art technology.
13.2 Microfluidic Cell Culture System
Microfluidic technology allows precise manipulation of fluid in a microscale device created with technologies developed by the semiconductor industry and micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS). Advances in microfabrication and soft lithography have enabled microfluidic culture systems to reconstitute dynamic, controlled spatio-temporal physico-chemical microenvironments to mimic in vivo conditions, distinguishing them from the existing cell culture platforms.
Microfluidic culture devices are usually generated by soft lithography pioneered by Whitesides et al. using polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS) [10, 11]. The classic process of PDMS chip fabrication begins from a mould manufactured using photoresistor silicon [12, 13]. A mixture of silicone rubber and cross-linking agent is poured into the mould and is then easily peeled off the substrate after cross-linking. The PDMS block can be reversibly sealed to other substrates, such as glass and PDMS simply by direct contact. It is also easy to irreversibly bond the PDMS chip to a PDMS substrate, silicon or glass by plasma oxidizing the PDMS surface to form Si-O-Si bonds or by using PDMS as glue [14]. These features make it possible to fabricate multilayer microfluidic chips with flexible microstructure configurations and channels for compartmentalizing cell culture by simply stacking PDMS pieces to connect different layers [15, 16]. The high elasticity of PDMS enables the integration of pneumatic microvalves into chips to realize complicated cell manipulations on-chip [17,18,19,20,21,22]. The major superiority of PDMS is its permeability to oxygen and its biocompatibility, which are necessary for long-term cell culture in sealed microchambers or microchannels. The property of PDMS of being optically transparent is favorable for observing cellular behavior and detecting molecules expressed in cells using a brightfield or fluorescence microscope. Besides PDMS, other polymeric materials have been utilized for fabricating configurable microstructures (e.g. microwell, micropillars and microchannels) for microfluidic cell culture [23,24,25,26,27,28]. In addition, natural polymers, such as agarose, fibrin and collagen, can also be used for generating cell-laden microfluidic chips with the creation of an in vivo-like extra-cellular matrix (ECM). More recently, paper-based substrates, which have a fibrous structure analogous to native ECM, have been developed to fabricate chips with 3D microstructures to support the culture of cancer cells, stem cells and cardiomyocytes [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The diverse properties of these materials have broadened the applications of microfluidics in cell-based biomedical research.
Microfluidic systems were initially applied to cell culture by simply lining the cells in the microchannels or microchambers in a 2D manner with perfused medium in a controlled way. They are often used to study cell growth, proliferation, differentiation and in drug testing. Lately, microfluidic technology has gradually moved to create 3D cell culture models in vitro due to its capability to produce and manipulate micron-sized 3D spheroids in a high-throughput manner with great reproducibility [35,36,37]. Cell spheroid formation is mostly based on the self-assembly features of cells. Although some conventional methods can produce cellular spheroids, such as non-adhesive culture substrates and spinner systems, these methods fail to create uniform cellular spheroids rapidly with controlled size. Recently, microfluidic devices have been developed to produce uniformly sized cellular aggregates [38,39,40]. These microfluidic based 3D aggregates can be used for generation of multiple types of spheroids from cancer cells, liver cells, and adult stem cells, as well as embryonic bodies (EBs) from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [41,42,43,44,45,46]. The cellular spheroids formed by single or multiple cell types can promote cell-cell interactions via gap junctions between cells and thus reduce the distance between cells and the chemical signals secreted from adjacent cells via paracrine pathways. Thus, these 3D cellular spheroids are effective in creating a variety of functional microtissues in vitro. A dynamic culture model in a microdevice can also accelerate the proliferation and maturation of tissues.
Microfluidic cell-laden culture systems are an ideal platform for studying cell-ECM interactions as present in the tissue microenvironment. This approach can realize the spatial arrangements of different cellular spheroids via specific microchannel designs, facilitating the study of spheroid-spheroid, and spheroid-ECM interactions. Compared to existing 3D methods, microfluidic-based 3D cell-laden culture has many advantages, including controllable size, arbitrary shape, macro-tissue reproduction, and easy manipulation of different hydrogels [47,48,49,50,51]. Cell-laden gels as a building block have potential for construction of functional tissues or organs. Zhang et al. proposed a novel and straightforward strategy to produce shape-controlled collagen building blocks via a membrane-templated microdevice [52]. This strategy enables the collagen blocks to self-assemble into 3D tissue-like microstructures with spatial distributions of cell types. These studies open new opportunities to investigate the mechanisms of tissue or organ development and tissue engineering applications.
13.3 Microengineering the Cellular Microenvironment
In order to conduct reliable microfluidics-based cell cultures, it is critical to mimic the cellular microenvironment encountered in vivo (Fig. 13.1). To construct a biomimetic cellular microenvironment in vitro, complex and multi-purpose designs are required to integrate micro-fabricated substrates with microfluidics technologies and cell biology. The in vivo cellular microenvironment is composed of both biochemical and mechanical signals produced by cells and the ECM. These stimuli may guide tissue organization and growth via orienting cell polarization and migration, balancing the growth and apoptosis, and regulating functional protein expression and cellular behavior to construct a functional and coordinated tissue. Cell-cell communications within cellular microenvironments share several common features, such as short communication distance between cells and other stimuli, continuous nutrient supply and waste removal, and synergistic actions of total cells to external stimuli. Microfluidic devices offer a powerful tool to reconstruct the cellular microenvironment via providing precise control of intercellular communication, as well as biochemical and biophysical cues that are necessary for the formation and development of tissues or organs.
13.3.1 Cell-Matrix Interaction
Extracellular matrix proteins secreted by different cell types provide important physical support for cells in the processes of tissue/organ formation [53, 54]. These matrix proteins direct cell fate and behavior via promoting cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. The receptor proteins on cellular membranes can recognize the specific ligands on cells or extracellular matrix proteins and trigger intra-cellular signaling pathways. Microfluidic platforms exhibit the ability to integrate the ECM within microsystems to form gradients of nutrients, oxygen and soluble factors [55,56,57] via spatio-temporal control of the cellular microenvironment. For example, a microfluidic-based turning-assay device was designed to realistically mimic the microenvironment of neuronal growth cones in vivo by combining precise gradients of soluble guidance cues with surface-bound guidance signals. The surface-bound laminin gradient enabled to tune the polarity of the neuronal growth cone in response to gradients of neurotrophic factors [58]. Lanfer et al. fabricated aligned collagen matrices using a microfluidic set-up in order to study the effects of collagen on the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) [59, 60]. Using microfabrication techniques, Chin et al. created an array of 10,000 microwells (coated by polyornithine and laminin) with 20–500 μm in diameter on a glass coverslip to study the combinatorial effects of growth factors and laminin protein on the proliferation and phenotypes of rat neural progenitor cells [61]. With these microdevices, the cell-matrix interactions could be studied in vitro in a biomimetic manner, which improves our understanding of the formation mechanism and development process of tissues/organs with anisotropic architecture.
13.3.2 Cell-Cell Interactions
Cell-cell interactions guide development and morphogenesis, as well as promote wound healing of tissues or organs because the body is composed of a variety of cell types working synergistically in organized structures. Commonly, cell-cell interactions under physiological conditions may happen either by direct contact relying on a tight cell-cell junction or by indirect contact via local diffusion of soluble factors or the system of endocrine regulation. It is feasible, with microfluidic technology, to manipulate and culture multiple cell types within a compartmentalized microdevice, which can facilitate the study of cell-cell interactions. Qin et al. developed a series of functional microfluidic chips to realise cellular co-cultures and investigate the interactions between different cell types. Two cell types, MSC and salivary gland cancer cells, were co-cultured in a compartmentalized PDMS microdevice fabricated with two separate chambers and PDMS pillar structures. This study demonstrated that MSCs could be recruited by cancer cells and this effect could be mediated by TGF-β, secreted by cancer cells [62]. It is well known that the first step of tumor cell metastasis is the transfer of circulating tumor cells across the vascular side in a tumor microenvironment. This work designed a 3D microfluidic cell co-culture model to investigate the interaction between cancer cells and endothelial cells, in which the device consists of a vessel-like cavity, endothelium and perivascular matrix containing chemokines [63]. This device enabled the modeling of tumor-cell metastasis in a dynamic manner and visualized observation of transendothelial invasion of cancer cells in real-time, something that is not possible by conventional methods.
The study of neurobiology requires the creation of cellular microenvironments containing multiple types of brain cells and biochemical cues in a precisely controlled manner. A microfluidic system with large open cell culture reservoirs was designed to generate neuronal microenvironments that enable to mimic axon transport and synapse formation via dynamic analysis. In this work, the motor neurons were co-cultured with C2C12-derived myotubes for substantial time periods on the devices in order to mimic the neuro-muscular junction [64]. This device provides a new platform to study the interaction between different cells, such as effector cells and target cells within the cellular microenvironment. Obviously, microfluidic culture systems offer advantages beyond existing methods by allowing to manipulate different cells in a flexible and organ relevant context.
13.3.3 Control of Biochemical Microenvironments
13.3.3.1 Gradients of Soluble Factors
In addition to cellular components, biochemical factors in the local tissue microenvironment may function as regulatory signals to guide various types of cellular behavior, such as cell growth and differentiation, migration and angiogenesis, by forming gradients of soluble molecules. It is quite difficult to generate physiologically relevant biochemical gradients on traditional 2D and 3D culture models. The ability of microfluidic techniques for producing chemical gradients holds great promise for mimicking and investigating the role of spatially defined soluble microenvironments in guiding cellular behavior and adversity of biological responses [65,66,67,68,69]. Classical microfluidic gradients were generated by manipulating diffused mass transport across the interface between adjacently flowing liquid streams in microchannels under laminar flow at low Reynolds numbers [70, 71]. To validate the chemo-attraction of leukocytes under inflammatory stimuli, Han et al. created a 3D microfluidic cell culture device that generated spatially controllable and stable gradients of two chemo-attractants [72]. A microfluidic gradient chip containing hydrogel-incorporating chambers between surface-accessible microchannels has been utilized to investigate angiogenesis under growth factor gradients in 3D microenvironments [73]. Aside from these methods of gradient formation, relying on laminar flow, Torisawa et al. developed a novel microfluidic device to generate physiologically relevant biochemical gradients by patterning chemo-attractant-secreting (source) and chemo-attractant-scavenging (sink) cells in spatially defined locations inside microchannels [74]. This culture system with more physiological chemoattractant gradients can be broadly used for engineering tissue microenvironments for the study of complex intercellular communications.
13.3.3.2 Control of Oxygen Concentration
Oxygen gradients play a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis in specific tissues, promoting angiogenesis and inducing acute cellular response under inflammatory conditions. Cells in the human body can respond to a wide range of relative oxygen concentrations; for example, normal arterial oxygen content in human brain ranges from 5 to 10 ml/dl. However, the cells in conventional culture systems are usually maintained in atmospheric condition of approximately 20% O2, which is higher than that in the body [75,76,77]. Microfluidic devices enable to control parameters of the cellular microenvironment and provide a unique opportunity to generate gaseous gradients with high spatio-temporal resolution [78,79,80]. A new type of microfluidic device capable of generating oxygen gradients for cell culture was developed based on spatially confined chemical reactions. This device requires a minimal amount of reagents and efficiently controls the oxygen gradients in cell cultures [81]. Derda et al. developed a paper-based cell culture system composed of stacked layers of paper that were impregnated with suspensions of cancer cells in an ECM hydrogel. This system enabled control of oxygen and nutrient gradients in a 3D microenvironment and allowed the analysis of molecular and genetic responses. The paper-supported gels provide a uniquely flexible platform to investigate cellular responses to 3D molecular gradients and to simulate tissue or organ level functions [32, 82].
13.3.4 Control of Biophysical Microenvironments
13.3.4.1 Fluid Flow-Induced Stress
Fluid flow exists ubiquitously in the human body, including in blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and its role is mass transport and the distribution of soluble factors. The fluid flows in the body span a wide range of fluid velocities from 0.1 μm/s to 0.3 m/s [83, 84]. Different flow velocities may induce various responses of different cell types. It is advantageous for biomimetic microfluidic cell culture devices to enable the simulation and generation of fluidic shear stress (FSS) within microchannels in order to investigate the effects of FSS on cellular adhesion, growth, protein expression and morphology. It is beneficial to be able to reproduce physiologically relevant shear stresses and to study their roles in regulating the specific tissues or organs at levels relevant for organs [85,86,87]. One significant feature of microfluidic devices lies in their enabling of integrated bioassays. An integrated microfluidic perfusion chip was developed to simultaneously produce multiple-parameter FSS in order to study the effects of fluid flow stimuli on the fate of MSC, chondrocytes and Yes-associated protein (YAP) expression associated with the regulations of cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and organ size [88]. Wang et al. constructed a microfluidic-based vascular-like chip to mimic blood vessels in vivo with the aim to study the role of fluid flow in the arrangement of human iPSC-derived endothelial cells (ECs) [89]. In this study, the FSS promoted the arrangement of ECs comparing with static cultures. In addition, this work also mimicked vascular inflammatory reactions under flow conditions by analyzing the interactions of ECs and inflammatory monocytes and the response of ECs to the inflammatory factor TNF-α. The cells showed a physiologically relevant feature under fluidic conditions not possible with conventional cell culture systems. FSS can also modulate cellular behavior via a reorganization of the cytoskeleton (F-actin stress fibers) in cells [90]. Jang et al. developed a microsystem to investigate the effects of luminal FSS on the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton of inner medullary collecting duct cells of the kidney as well as the translocation of water transport proteins anchoring on the cellular membrane [91, 92]. A biomimetic microfluidic chip was designed to mimic the flow of urine within the proximal tubule and to study the effects of complement C3a on the epithelial-to mesenchymal (EMT) of proximal tubular epithelial cells after being exposed to serum proteins [93].
Due to the microstructure design of the microfluidic devices, they can also be utilized for recapitulating the effects of fluid forces on modulating angiogenesis associated with tumor biology. To investigate the collective roles of fluid and soluble factors on endothelial sprouting, Song and Munn designed a microfluidic culture device that consists of two parallel microchannels lined with HUVEC and a central microchannel filled with collagen gel which separates the two parallel mcirochannels [94]. Multiple mechanical and chemical cues were generated in this microfluidic cell culture system to mimic the physiological microenvironment of ECs angiogenesis.
13.3.4.2 Tissue Mechanics
In addition to fluid shear stresses, cells also experience organ-specific mechanical cues, such as tensile and compressive forces under normal physiological and pathological conditions. A multilayer microfluidic device was designed to study the combinatorial effects of solid mechanical and surface tension stress induced by cyclic wall stretching and the propagation of the air-liquid interface in the alveoli of the lung [95]. This platform generated more physiologically relevant mechanical cues and provided more detailed information than previous models of ventilator-induced pulmonary injury which were based on cyclic stretching [96, 97] or air-liquid interface flow over the cells respectively [98, 99].
Previous studies of gut absorption and metabolism, using human intestinal epithelial cells (e.g. Caco-2), failed to reproduce most of the differentiated organ-specific features of living intestine by culturing these cells on plastic flasks or Transwell inserts as well as microfluidic chips [100,101,102]. The main reason is that epithelial cells in culture are not able to experience the natural mechanical stimuli including fluid flow and cyclic peristaltic motions in the normal intestine in vivo. Recently, Ingberet al. developed a multilayer microfluidic gut-on-a-chip device with a flexible, porous ECM-coated membrane between two PDMS chips containing microchannels. The intestinal epithelial cells were cultured on the membrane substrate in the microchannels and experienced physiological mechanical strains including trickling flow and cyclic mechanical distortion [103, 104]. These mechanical stimuli induced the cells to spontaneously form robust intestinal villi structures that hold the features of tight junctions between cells, coating with brush borders and mucus. The mechanical cues also promoted differentiation of the cells into four different cell lineages of the small intestine, including absorptive, mucus-secretory, enteroendocrine and Paneth, and produced a higher resistance epithelial barrier.
In addition, mechanical strains also influence the biological behaviors of stem cells. Gao et al. created a simple membrane-based microfluidic device to study the effects of cyclic tensile stress on the proliferation and differentiation of MSC [105]. This tensile stress was generated by deforming the elastic PDMS membrane sandwiched between the two layer PDMS chips via negative pressure. The MSCs cultured on the membrane were subjected to different magnitudes of tensile force. The results recapitulated the results that higher tensile stress could promote proliferation, osteogenesis and inhibit adipogenesis of MSCs, providing a new method using tensile stress to regulate the osteogenesis/adipogenesis balance in the development and damage repair of organs.
13.4 From Cells-on-Chip to Organs-on-Chips
In vitro cell culture systems can reflect some biological behavior and functions of cells. However, how cells as the basic building blocks of all living organisms can be made to assemble into functional tissues and organs in vitro has been, and remains, a major challenge of recent decades. Organ-on-a-chip technology rapidly advanced on the basis of integration of microfabrication and microfluidics technology that enable to recapitulate the dynamic and complex tissue microenvironment from the cellular to the tissue and organ level [106, 107]. Organs-on-chips have progressed to the point where it has become feasible to engineer the structural arrangements and functional complexity of living organs by culturing cells in microfluidic channels with multicellular microarchitecture, tissue-tissue interfaces, and biochemical/physical cues in an organ-relevant context (Fig. 13.2). It should benoted that this technology is not intended to engineer a whole living organ but rather to rebuild minimal functional units that represent some specific functions of tissues or organs [108]. In earlier work, the concept of organ-on-a-chip focused on a simple design with perfused microchannels or chambers containing one cell type (e.g., ECs, hepatocytes or intestinal epithelial cells) that represents the functions of one tissue type. Recently, more complex organ-on-chip devices were developed with multi-layer structures connected by porous membranes. Different cells were cultured on opposite sides of membranes to establish interfaces between different tissues (e.g. the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or the lung alveolar-capillary interface). These devices can combine simultaneously chemical signals (e.g. soluble factors) with physical cues (e.g. fluidic shear stress, mechanical pressure and cyclic mechanical strains). They can also be used for real-time analysis of organ-specific responses to drugs, toxins or other environmental perturbations and circulating immune cells. Nowadays, multiple types of organs-on-chips have been created for studying the various biological processes at physiological or pathological levels in ways that are not possible by traditional cell culture and animal models [109,110,112] (Table 13.1).
13.4.1 Bioengineering Organs on Chip
13.4.1.1 Lung on a Chip
The lung is the primary respiratory organ in humans. Much effort is devoted to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung diseases in biomedical research. The alveolar-capillary interface is the fundamental functional unit of the living lung. Some methods developed to-date reproduce the geometry of the lung epithelial-endothelial interface via culturing epithelial and endothelial cells on opposite sides of a thin porous membrane. However, these models failed to mimic the mechanical microenvironment of a living breathing lung [113]. Tavana et al. developed a similar design to monitor the effect of pulmonary pressure on the cell culture system [114]. This model focused on the role that surfactants play in the damage of alveolar epithelial cells. The results demonstrated that the surfactant, Survanta, reduced the cell injuries induced by the liquid plug flow. This lung-on-a-chip system is helpful for the investigation of cellular and sub-cellular effects in airway reopening.
Huh et al. developed a microfluidic lung-on-a-chip device comprising two PDMS layers with microchannels separated by a nanoporous membrane with the purpose to analyze the effects of liquid plug flow on human epithelial cells [99]. Using a similar microdevice, this biomimetic microsystem was used to mimic the structural alveolar-capillary interface of the lung, and the physiological pulmonary respiratory movement via compression and expansion of the system [115]. In this system, human alveolar epithelial cells and pulmonary capillary endothelial cells were cultured on the opposite side of the flexible PDMS membrane that was used to reproduce physiological breathing. Two microchannels on both sides of the PDMS membrane acted as vacuum chambers to mimic breathing movements. The authors found that uptake of nanoparticles by the epithelial cells and endothelial cells increased and that the transport of nanoparticles into the underlying vascular channels was stimulated by the mechanicals constrains of air being pulled in and out of the device. The authors also introduced bacteria and inflammatory cytokines into the air and human bloodborne immune cells into the vascular channels in order to mimic the innate cellular response to pulmonary infection of bacterial origin. Another lung disease model was devised in order to mimic the development and progression of human pulmonary edema induced by the cancer drug interleukin-2 (IL-2) using the same lung-on-a-chip device [116]. Similar to previous chips, air was introduced into the upper alveolar channels and liquid was introduced into the lower vascular channels. The results demonstrated that IL-2 leaked into the alveolar channels increasingly under the cyclic mechanical strains and drug DSK2193874 could inhibit the leakage induced by IL-2. This human disease model-on-a-chip could bring research one step closer to predicting the efficacy of a new drug for pulmonary edema.
13.4.1.2 Gastrointestines on a Chip
The gut is one of the essential components for the maintainance of immune responses and for the natural development of the human body. It is necessary to construct in vitro cell-based gut models that aid in the study of the structural, mechanical, absorption functional, drug transportation and pathophysiological properties of the living gut [117]. Several models were developed using human intestinal tumor-derived Caco-2 cells to simulate the intestinal structure and function including Transwell filter inserts and miniaturized microfluidic devices [102, 118,118,120]. In other work, the researchers developed a new approach to rebuild the normal 3D microarchitecture of the intestinal lining in vitro via culturing intestinal epithelial cells on hydrogel substrates that were microfabricated to simulate the size, shape and density of human intestinal villi [121]. However, these in vitro models are not able to recapitulate the mechanical microenvironment of the gut, including peristaltic movements and intraluminal fluid flow of human living intestine that is crucial for normal organ physiology and pathology.
To overcome these limitations, Kim et al. demonstrated a functional human gut-on-a-chip microfluidic device composed of two microchannels separated by a porous flexible, clear PDMS membrane pre-coated with ECM and lined with Caco-2 cells [103] (Fig. 13.3). This model adopted fluid flow conditions at a low shear stress (0.002 N·m−2) and cyclic strain (10%; 0.15 Hz) simultaneously to mimic the intraluminal fluid flow and physiological peristaltic motions in living intestine. Caco-2 cells formed confluent polygonal epithelial monolayers with tight junction protein expression and exhibited differentiated intestinal barrier functions in the microfluidic device after only 3 days culture, which was less than that required on Transwell culture system (>21 days). The flow velocity also influenced the differentiation and polarization of epithelial cells. More interestingly, this study demonstrated for the first time that the planar columnar epithelium spontaneously deformed to form undulations and folds when Caco-2 cells were maintained in the device with the flow and cyclic strain for extended periods of time. These folds exhibited the morphology of normal intestinal villi formed by polarized columnar epithelium with basal nuclei and separated by crypts. In addition, the authors tried to culture the normal intestinal microbial flora, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, on the apical surface of differentiated intestinal epithelial monolayers under continuous flow and cyclic strain context. The results showed that normal intestinal microbes can be co-cultured for over 1 week on the apical surface of the cultured epithelium. Based on this gut-on-a-chip device, the same group further explored the structure and function of epithelium using the tumor-derived Caco-2 cells in detail [104]. The cells formed undulating structures containing basal proliferative crypts and the four types of differentiated epithelial cells (absorptive, mucus-secretory, enteroendocrine and Paneth) of normal intestinal villi. Furthermore, the intestinal models on chips behaved similarly to normal intestinal physiology, such as more efficient glucose reuptake, higher cytochrome P450-3A4 isoform activity and mucus production than previous static culture systems. Thus, this human gut-on-a-chip may play a critical role in studying the mechanical regulation of intestinal function and host-microbe symbiosis and evolution.
The stomach is another important organ in the digestive system with specific chemical and physical microenvironments. Gastric mucus serves in protecting the epithelial cells of the stomach wall from injures by the acidic digestive juices in the gastric lumen. Li et al. reported an in vitro microfluidic device that replicated a dynamic stomach acid barrier [122]. This study used native mucins obtained from pig gastric mucus and perfused continuously mucus liquid into the epithelial lumen. Several models of the mass transport were constructed to investigate the effects of H+-mucin interaction on the diffusion of H+ and acid penetration was monitored using the pH sensitive dye Oregon Green by live fluorescence microscopy. This work indicated that a continuously secreted mucin layer can hinder acid diffusion. This stomach-on-a-chip holds promise for the study of the barrier functions provided by the mucus layer and the interaction of the mucus layer and drugs.
13.4.1.3 Liver on a Chip
The liver is a major organ with multiple functions for protein synthesis, detoxification of various substrates, digestion and metabolic activities in the human body. Multiple liver-on-a-chip devices were fabricated to construct liver microsystem due to their ability to mimic the complex in vivo microenvironment [123,123,125]. To mimic the functional unit of the liver, Lee et al. developed a biologically inspired artificial liver sinusoid microdevice [126]. In this microfluidic chip, an endothelial-like barrier formed by microstructure served a mass transport function similar to the liver acinus. Primary rat and human hepatocytes were co-cultured in the configuration for 7 days without ECM coating. This model has also been applied to test the hepatotoxicity of diclofenac. With the advances of microfabrication technology, well-organized liver microtissues were created that simulated both the structural and physiological functions of the living liver in contrast to the conventional approaches using random co-culture methods. Micropatterned substrates can offer a suitable microenvironment to explore the cell-interactions in co-culture systems [127,128,129,130]. Although 2D patterning is convenient to control the spatial position of hepatocytes and other supporting cells, fresh primary hepatocytes cultured on 2D substrates rapidly, lose their capacity to proliferate, to form differentiated structures and their liver-specific functions compared to 3D culture microenvironments [131]. 3D culture systems can promote the hepatocytes’ functions and maintain their differentiated properties for extended times in vitro, as well as mimic in vivo structural features including lobule and tubular architectures as closely as possible [132, 133]. Currently, several methods have been developed to construct 3D liver microtissues, including a spinner culture system, non-adhesive surfaces, pellet culture models, cell sheets and a hanging drop [134], but the microfluidic-based procedures may be more effective as they offer a convenient and straightforward platform in order to form uniformly sized and shaped 3D structures [135, 136].
Continuous perfusion is of great importance in 3D cell culture systems in order to maintain the long term function and viability of hepatocytes. Microfluidic technology enables the precise control mechanism for perfusing medium with nutrients and controlling its chemical composition not possible using traditional culture system. The fluid flow promoted and maintained the 3D tissue-like structure and cell-specific function of primary human hepatocytes and stem cell differentiation into hepatocytes [137,137,139]. Dash et al. reported that hepatocytes exhibited an enhanced capacity of metabolism of specific cytochrome P450 enzymes in a flow system compared with non-flow conditions [140]. Trietsch et al. developed a stratified 3D cell culture model incorporated in a microtiter plate format. The hepatocytes and fibroblasts were co-cultured in the way of mixed or side-by-side format to evaluate the toxicity of rifampicin. Furthermore, this device was used to study the invasion and aggregation of breast cancer cells [141]. To mimic the functional unit of the liver, a microfluidic culture device was created to rebuild the microscopic structure of the hepatic cords [142]. The asymmetric tip of the device with two separate compartments can house two cells side-by-side and the aligned hepatocytes can self-organize and form bile canaliculi along the cord-like microscale structure. Recently, Esch et al. fabricated a low-cost cell culture device to culture 3D liver microtissues containing multiple liver cell types including primary hepatocytes, stellate cells, fibroblasts and Kupffer cells under fluid flow condition [143]. These 3D liver microtissues had good enzymatic activity and responded to bacterial lipoprotein. All these 3D liver microsystems represent an important step towards adoption of organ-on-a-chip technology for disease modeling and drug development.
13.4.1.4 Heart on a Chip
Microengineering cardiac tissue can potentially drive the development of efficacy and toxicity of drugs via reproducing crucial cardiac physiological features. Currently, several heart-on-chip systems have been explored to mimic physical, mechanical and biological functions of living heart which are not realized using conventional 2D culture systems [144,144,145,146,149,149]. Parker et al. designed a microfluidic device to culture rat cardiomyocytes using fibronectin-coated flexible elastomeric cantilevers cultured to form anisotropic muscular tissue [150]. The average systolic stress and diastolic stress were within the stress range published previously using isolated muscle strips [151]. These muscular thin films exhibited a chronotropic effect as the concentration of epinephrine increasing by dose-response curve experiments. This platform was further improved by combining a fluid flow control system and the platinum electrodes to collect accurate functional contractile response to a cardiac drug isoproterenol (β-adrenergic agonist) [152]. This high throughput heart-on-a-chip device is very useful for collecting large quantities of high quality functional data, testing cardiac drug and integration with other organs. Serena et al. reported a microfluidic device based on micropatterning techniques which can selectively treat areas of the cell array and perform multi-parametric assays [153].
Microfluidic technology can be integrated with stem cells to generate human derived cardiac tissues. The cardiac bodies derived from iPSCs were captured in niches along a perfusion microchannel in a microfluidic device. The cardiomyocyte clusters exhibited well-developed sarcomeres and cardiac protein markers (Nkx2.5 and Cx43) as well as in vivo-like cardiac function [154, 155]. In addition, a non-invasive recording method was introduced in this study to calculate the beating frequency of cardiac bodies using an ordinary microscope. These 3D cardiac bodies responded to different drugs rapidly in a similar manner to living heart tissue in a body. Other researchers explored different microfluidic approaches to form cell-laden hydrogels in order to evaluate the functionality of the cardiac tissue constructs. Aung et al. produced 3D perfused cardiomyoctes-laden hydrogels within a microfluidic chip and monitored the contractile stress of cardiac tissues in real-time and in situ measurements [156]. A cardiac microphysiological system was developed to recapitulate a minimal human cardiac microtissue in a central microchannel of the microfluidic device. This biomimetic system can drive the self-organization of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes into aligned 3D heart organoids which presented spontaneous beating at physiological level [157, 158]. The heart microtissues were also treated with multiple drugs at different concentrations. The results demonstrated that half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values were more consistent with the data on tissue scale references compared to studies at cellular level.
13.4.1.5 Blood-Brain-Barrier on Chip
The blood-brain-barrier (BBB) is a selective yet dynamic barrier between the central nervous tissues and the circulatory system, which is formed by microvascular ECs, pericytes and the perivascular end-feet of astrocytes. The dysfunction of this barrier is associated with brain tumors, Alzheimer’s and neurodegenerative diseases. Reproducing the physiological characteristics and functional responses of the BBB in a reliable model will greatly promote the development of novel therapeutics for central nervous system diseases [199, 200]. To mimic the in vivo BBB, a microfluidic BBB (μBBB) was created by lining a fibronectin-coated polycarbonate membrane with brain microvascular endothelial cells and astrocytes on the opposite side of the membrane [159]. This BBB exhibited a well-developed biological function, including higher trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) across the barrier, and being more impermeable to large molecules. A more complex microfluidic device of the neurovascular unit was created by co-culturing rat brain microvascular ECs and a mixture of three different cell types derived from rat brain (astrocytes, neurons and microglia) on opposite sides of a porous membrane [160]. The endothelial cells formed a good barrier and the neuronal cells fired inhibitory as well as excitatory potentials after having been cultured for 10 days. Moreover, a tissue-mimetic neuroinflammation model was also established on this chip by stimulating the ECs with inflammatory factor TNF-α for 6 h, leading to the significant activation of resident microglia and astrocytes on the neural side.
13.4.1.6 Multiple Organs on a Chip
The advances of single organ-on-a-chip technology highlight the importance of interaction between different cell types within the same functional unit of the organ. More complex microfluidic chips integrating tissue-tissue interfaces and compartmentalized microchambers connected with microchannels (e.g., blood-brain-barrier, lung alveolar-capillary barrier) make it possible to create multiple organs on a chip. These multi-organs on a chip are designed to maintain multiple cell types in different culture compartments in one device for long-term culture and integrate them into one system in order to mimic organ-organ interaction. In the past decade, several multiorgans-on-chip devices have been developed for potential use in disease modeling and drug toxicity screening applications. To mimic physiologically relevant organs realistically in vivo, some key aspects need to be considered to design the chip, such as the size of the organs, interactions between different organs and the organ volume-medium ratio (scaling of organ sizes and vascular flow in vivo). Wikswo et al. discussed scaling arguments about microengineering multi-organs on a chip to guide the design of a universal cell-culture medium without red blood cells [161]. It is mentioned that the prototype drug metabolized by the liver component could have therapeutic effects. Thus, the liver should be placed upstream of the drug target organs in designing the multi-organs on a chip.
The field of multiorgans-on-chips is explored and investigated for different purposes [162]. To study tissue cross-effects, liver and intestinal slices isolated from the same rat were cultured in one microdevice [163]. The liver and intestinal slices remained functional under flow conditions, indicating the potential of this chip for the study of inter-organ interactions. Wagner et al. cultured human primary hepatocytes and skin biopsies simultaneously in one microfluidic device for up to 28 days [164]. These studies demonstrated that the primary tissues from living body can maintain their functions in vitro under dynamic culture condition. Moreover, a 3D two-organs-on-chip device was created to support the survival of differentiated neurospheres and liver spheroids in a combined media circuit over 14 days [165]. In the study it was suggested that the two combined tissues were more sensitive to the 2, 5-hexanedione compared to respective single-tissue cultures, maybe due to the tissue-tissue interactions. As is well established, most orally adminstred drugs are absorbed and metabolised in the small intestine or the liver and excreted by the kidney. However, it is impossible to mimic these processes in vitro using conventional cell-based models.
A typical example of a three organs-on-chip device was designed with a 3D hydrogel culture in which three cell lines were cultured to assess metabolism-dependent cytotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs [166] (Fig. 13.4). In this microsystem, cancer cells, liver cells and myeloblasts were cultured in separate chambers representing cancerous tissue, liver and bone marrow. Tegafur, an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, was introduced into this system to test the cytotoxicity to the three cell lines. Compared with conventional 96-well microtiter plates, the micro cell culture system enabled to reproduce the metabolism of Tegafur to 5-fluorouracil in the liver and the resulting death of cells caused by 5-fluorouracil, while cells in the 96-well microtiter plate did not display the same results. Esch et al. designed a microscale body-on-a-chip system containing gastrointestinal tract, liver and other tissues to mimic the oral uptake of nanoparticles. The nanoparticles were transported across the GI epithelium and interacted with liver cells resulting in the damage of the latter [167].
To improve the functions of multiorgans-on-chip, a four-organ-chip microphysiological system was proposed to maintain the functionality of four organs containing human intestine, liver, skin and kidney over 28 days [168]. Considering the size ratio of tissues on chip compared to human living organs, the intestine and skin tissues on chip are at a size 100,000-fold smaller than their counterpart organs. 3D liver microtissues, equivalent to ten liver lobules, were found to mimick liver function. Human proximal tubule cell lineage RPTEC/TERT-1 was used to form the proximal tubule barrier on a polymeric membrane to mimic the metabolite excretion. A peristaltic micropump integrated in this chip enables pulsed medium flow interconnecting the four organs through microchannels. This device considered the physiological fluid-to-tissue ratio which is important to accurately simulate the drug metabolism. This microsystem exhibited remarkably robust homeostasis and functionality of the four organ equivalents, presenting itself as a good platform for in vitro adsorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination (ADME) modeling. A new type of four organs-on-chip device was fabricated to culture four human cell types representing liver, lung, kidney and the adipose tissue, respectively [169]. A common culture medium is the key factor to be considered in the development of multiple cell type culture systems that should satisfy all types of cells. This is also the critical question for designing multi-organs on a chip in the future.
13.4.2 Integrated Analysis System
One of the most powerful opportunities for microfluidic organs-on-chip for biomedical applications is the capacity of integrated analysis system to monitor and control organs in real-time. Existing automated techniques enable us to monitor cellular proliferation, morphology and molecular changes in multiwell plates. However, it is difficult to monitor the complex multiple parameters on organ microsystems including gradients of chemical factors and of oxygen, fluid flow shear, mechanical cues, matrix composition and metabolites. Currently, several types of microsensors for real-time monitoring of organ conditions have provided measurements of basic cell culture parameters including oxygen, pH, temperature, and molecular composition (e.g., glucose and lactate). More specialized sensor measurements are widely used to monitor the trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) which usually exists in biological barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier, intestinal epithelial-capillary barrier and the lung alveolar-capillary barrier. Recent efforts indicate that TEER measurements in organs-on-chip systems present specific challenges and are highly sensitive to slight changes in the cell barrier membrane [170]. Hence, the automated and precise measurements of TEER in a complex organ microsystem would increase reliability and offer key information on the organ condition and responses to different drugs.
13.5 Proof-of-Concept Applications of Organs-on-Chip
13.5.1 Disease Modeling
Disease modeling is one of the main applications of organs-on-chip technology, ranging from genetic diseases to infectious, cancerous and degenerative diseases, and is helpful for understanding the disease etiology, diagnostic strategies and effective therapies. Several proof-of-concept disease models have been reported to date.
13.5.1.1 Inflammatory-Related Diseases
Inflammation reactions are closely related to many diseases and can lead to serious pathological symptoms. Pneumonia is one of most common lung diseases, characterized by its complexity, acute onset and difficulty to control it. Establishing an in vitro model to study the disease mechanism and to be able to screen for efficient drugs is an urgent requirement in order to address this challenging disease. The breathing lung-on-a-chip, as mentioned above, recapitulated the epithelium-endothelium interface under fluid flow and cyclic mechanical strain conditions to mimic the functional unit of the lung. Inflammatory models were developed in this system by administrating immune activator TNF-α or bacteria which increased expression of surface ICAM-1 of endothelial cells and recruitment of human neutrophils [114]. Based on the lung-on-a-chip system, the same research group further mimicked a pulmonary edema model by the cancer drug interleukin-2 (IL-2) which can cause pulmonary vascular permeability and lung edema [115]. This lung disease model also recapitulated that the mechanical strain caused by the breathing motions promote increased vascular leakage and pulmonary edema induced by IL-2 but not the circulating immune cells. An organ-level lung small airway-on-a-chip model was created to study human chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and drug response using patient and healthy lung microvascular endothelial cells and airway epithelial cells [171]. This model effectively rebuilt many properties of the structures and functions of human lung bronchioles and maintained them for weeks in vitro which is crucial for studying chronic disease in vitro including cell types and cilia structure. More importantly, interleukin-13 (IL-13) stimulated the epithelium leading to goblet cell hyperplasia, cytokine hypersecretion and ciliary functional decline of asthmatics. Using the robust in vitro lung-on-a-chip model, it is possible to screen for synergistic effects of lung epithelium and endothelium on cytokine secretion, discover new biomarkers of disease exacerbation and evaluate responses to anti-inflammatory drugs.
In addition, neuroinflammation was studied by a more complex microfluidic chip supporting the neurovascular unit containing endothelial barrier on one side of a porous membrane and three various brain cell types (astrocytes, neurons and microglia) on the other. Inflammatory factor, TNF-α, stimulated the vascular endothelium which activated adjacent microglia and astrocytes. This process is similar to what happens in vivo in situations such as neuroinfectious diseases [160].
13.5.1.2 Brain diseases on Chip
Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) seriously threaten human health. In order to better understand disease etiology and to develop efficient treatment strategies, it is indispensable to seek a suitable in vitro model for exploring the mechanisms of brain diseases. Lee et al. presented a microfluidic device to create 3D neurospheroids which more closely simulate the in vivo brain microenvironment (Fig. 13.5) [172]. The uniform neurospheroids formed in concave microwell arrays are exposed to all directions and are able to interact. By introducing an interstitial level of flow using an osmotic micropump system, this model system demonstrated that the flow could promote neurospheroid growth, improved neural network formation compared with cultures under static conditions, as well as enabled long-term cultures without the need for peripheral devices. To test the potential of this microfluidic microsystem as an in vitro brain disease model, the authors added the amyloid-β peptide, which is generally viewed as the major contributor in AD, on 3D neurospheroids under interstitial flow conditions. The study indicated that the neurotoxic effects of amyloid-β led to a decline in neural cell viability and destroyed neural networks via inducing synaptic dysfunction. Taken together, this biomimetic brain-on-a-chip device recreates a 3D cytoarchitecture and interstitial flow of brain in vivo, as well as mimics the pathological changes of AD in vitro. This platform has great potential for investigating neurodegenerative disease pathology and treatment strategies as well as for drug testing applications.
13.5.1.3 Cancers on Chip
Cancers are a large family of diseases that seriously threaten human health and life. The development of cancers involves abnormal cell growth and invasion of other important organs. It is very helpful to establish in vitro models to study the biological behavior of cancer cells and anticancer drug effects. Currently, numerous groups have developed cancer-on-a-chip models by mimicking tumor microenvironments consisting of complex cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, chemokine/cytokine gradients and biophysical cues [173,174,175]. Xu et al. fabricated a bilayer PDMS microfluidic chip to mimic the glioblastoma invasion into ECM under different concentrations of oxygen [176]. This work investigated the role of hypoxia and EMT in glioblastoma and hypoxia promoted the proliferation of the cancer cells and EMT-associated protein expression, and enhanced cell migration. The mechanism linking EMT and cancer cell behavior could be related to the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α or 2α (HIF1α or HIF2α), indicating that developing inhibitors of HIFs may be a novel therapeutic drug. Li et al. demonstrated a high throughput microdevice containing tunable cell micro-niches, which performs flow-based analysis of large cell populations to evaluate various responses of lung adenocarcinoma cells to different ECM proteins and soluble factors [177]. This study indicated that tumor-cell growth is related to TGF-β and TGF-βR2 inhibitor drugs in a 3D matrix but not in a 2D culture. Angiogenesis of tumors is a key step of tumor metastasis towards distant target organs. Several works were performed to study the intravasation and extravasation of tumor cells using microfluidic devices [178, 179]. Other studies have utilized similar microfluidic technology to investigate the molecular mechanisms of cancer cell-immune cell crosstalk [180].
13.5.2 Drug Testing
13.5.2.1 Efficacy and Toxicity Testing
One challenge of drug development is the poor efficacy and unexpected toxicity in clinical trials caused by an absence of predicted therapeutic effects. The main reason for undesired outcomes is that existing approaches fail to accurately predict in vivo drug efficacy before clinical application. Human organ-on-a-chip systems that model human physiological and pathological functional units of living organs provide a promising tool to address the limitations of existing methods. They allow to reconstruct and pharmacologically modulate key aetiologies and clinical relevant responses at various levels of biological complexity and to test unanticipated off-target toxicity. As described above, a heart-on-a-chip composed of 20 rat cardiomyocyte thin films was utilized to evaluate the inotropic effects of the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol which are similar to those previously determined in rats [152]. A recent study reported a micro-engineered 3D model of EMT during cancer progression for testing drug efficacy [181]. This model demonstrated EMT-induced tumor dispersion and phenotypic changes by culturing lung tumor spheroids in a matrix gel close to microchannels inhabited with endothelial cells. In addition, 12 drugs, including approved drugs, as well as prospective drugs that are in the early discovery pipeline, were perfused into the vascular microchannels to evaluate the potential of this model as a drug screening platform. The ability of these drugs to inhibit EMT was tested by direct visualization of the cancer spheroids. The results showed that efficacious concentrations derived from the cancer-on-a-chip were higher than that from the 2D system, but are also closer to the range of effective drug concentrations determined in clinical trials. Several micro-engineered models of breast cancer and multiple organ models of uterine cancer, bone marrow and liver have also demonstrated a similar difference between effective drug concentrations determined by organs-on-chip platforms and those by conventional 2D culture systems [182, 183]. To investigate the communication between different brain regions, organotypic brain slices from rat hippocampus and entorhinal cortex were cultured in compartments interconnected by microchannels [184]. A glutamate receptor antagonist (kynurenic acid) was introduced to one microchannel in order to selectively inhibit the spontaneous electrical excitation of the treated brain tissue but not on the other brain slice. This design allows for the selective pharmacological administration of only one tissue and evaluation of its effects across the synaptic connection.
Recently, Qin et al. developed a novel in vivo-like 3D blood-brain barrier model that replicates the complex multicellular architecture, functions and mechanical properties of the BBB in vivo [185] (Fig. 13.6). The BBB model encompassed essential components, including primary brain microvascular endothelial cells, astrocytes and ECM which orchestrate to form a more stringent structure of a BBB (Fig. 13.6). In this microsystem, the TEER value in the BBB interface under dynamic culture condition is around 1300 Ω × cm2, a value that far exceeds that reported in Transwell-based BBB models in a static context [186, 187]. Moreover, this BBB model was used to understand the interplay of the BBB and exogenous cancer cells in the course of brain metastasis in real-time. As is well-known, efficiently delivering a drug to the brain is still a challenge at present because of the selective permeability of the BBB to different exotic molecules. In this work, the in vitro BBB model exhibited a robust and realistic experimental result with regard to drug response of brain tumors including primary and secondary cancers and the high throughput design is very useful to screen multiple drugs simultaneously, which is not possible in other BBB models in vitro and in animal experiments. This physiological BBB microsystem provides a versatile and valuable platform for neuroscientific research, drug testing and pharmaceutical development.
Unanticipated adverse drug effects are another very common cause of the costly withdrawal of marketed drugs and clinical trial failures. Animal experiments often fail to reveal important toxic effects in humans and can lead to unnecessary rejection of drug candidates due to the genetic background and biological discrepancy and animal-specific pathways of toxicity. Organ-on-a-chip devices used in liver toxicity have been reported recently to analyze the metabolism of hepatotoxicity. For example, a microfluidic device was developed to culture human hepatocytes in order to monitor metabolic responses of hepatocytes to flutamide (a type of anticancer drug) and the hepatotoxic properties of flutamide and its active metabolite hydroxyflutamide. This study showed the metabolic signatures of toxic responses and described metabolic pathways induced by the drug and its metabolites in hepatotoxicity. The human liver-on-a-chip model leveraged in this work was influential in reducing biological noise inherent to in vivo metabolomics models, and indicating a potential source of hepatotoxicity-specific biomarkers. The secondary toxic effects of drug metabolites generated in the liver on other organs were also demonstrated by two organ liver-kidney organ-on-a-chip devices [188]. This study mimicked the systemic interplay between the two organs and recapitulated nephrotoxic responses to the ifosfamide metabolites produced by hepatocytes. More recently, drug-induced cardiotoxicity was also tested using an organ-on-a-chip platform by rebuilding and monitoring the contractile functions of heart muscle by means of quantitative analysis [189, 190].
13.5.2.2 Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models have been broadly used to analyze and predict the whole body response to drugs in a time-dependent manner by featuring the mechanistic basis of multi-organ interactions. Multiorgans-on-chips were developed to analyze the bioaccumulation, distribution, and toxicity of selected chemical compounds [191]. The toxicant naphthalene was converted by hepatocytes into its reactive metabolites which depleted the intracellular glutathione of lung cells as soon as circulating to the lung tissue chamber. Adipocytes differentiated from 3 T3-L1 in the fat tissue chamber moderated the glutathione depletion induced by naphthalene, but preferentially accumulated hydrophobic compounds. This study is the first model of adsorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicity (ADMET) that performed all of these functions on the same device. Over the past decade, many researchers have explored the utilization of organs-on-chips to investigate drug ADMET features, to support PK/PD modeling, and to evaluate drug efficacy [192,193,194]. Li et al. developed a new and multilayer organs-on-chip device to assess drug metabolism and its active metabolite drug efficacy and cytotoxicity in four organ-specific cells simultaneously representing the liver, breast cancer, lung tumor, and normal gastric cells [195]. In this study, the prodrug capecitabine (CAP) was first metabolized in a top liver tissue chamber with hepatocytes (HepG2) and its intermediate metabolites, 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (DFUR), was further metabolized into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by targeting cancer tissue and normal tissue cells (Fig. 13.7). This work recapitulated that the CAP exhibited strong cytotoxicity on breast and lung cancer cells, but not in normal gastric cells.
All these studies demonstrate an opportunity for organ-on-a-chip devices in the field of drug development to simulate and predict the key physiological responses involved in drug metabolism, bioactivity, efficacy and toxicity, and increase likelihood of success in clinical trials.
13.5.3 Host-Microbe Interaction
The gut microbiome can deeply impact many aspects of human bio-behavior, such as mental activities, stress responses via brain-gut communication [196]. The balance of intestinal microbial diversity is crucial to maintain human health status and alteration of intestinal microbiota is related to many acute and chronic diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases [197].The gut microbial community is a dynamic ecosystem that can be influenced by many factors, such as food type, living condition and host genetics. Therefore, establishment of a stable host-microbe ecosystem in vitro is crucial for understanding the human intestinal diseases, regulating nutrient and drug absorption. However, existing 2D, static culture methods fail to rebuild functional intestinal structure and establish a stable symbiosis between host intestinal epithelium and a certain population of bacterial cells for extended time periods because bacterial overgrowth occurs rapidly within 1 day.
Alternatively, microfluidic devices can provide a desirable culture platform to co-culture the host cells and bacteria under dynamic conditions. The human gut-on-a-chip was developed using intestinal epithelial cells that grew into 3D villi stably on optically clear, microporous PDMS membranes sandwiched by two PDMS layers with parallel hollow microchannels. In this microsystem, multiple commensal microbes were directly co-cultured with epithelial cells for more than 1 week. This study recapitulated the individual contributors containing the peristalsis-associated mechanical deformations, gut microbiome and inflammatory cells to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation [198]. Lack of epithelial deformation generated by peristalsis-like motion led to bacterial overgrowth similar to that observed in inflammatory intestinal diseases. Most importantly, this in vitro intestinal model replicated results from past human and animal studies which demonstrated that antibiotic and probiotic treatment can suppress villus injury caused by pathogenic bacteria. The intestinal epithelial cells were also stimulated by immune cells and lipopolysaccharide endotoxin to produce four pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, −8, −1β,and TNF-α) that can trigger villus injury and compromise intestinal barrier function. In future studies, gut-on-a-chip devices can be used to investigate the host-microbe interaction in a physiological or pathological context.
13.6 Conclusion and Outlooks
Novel bioengineered organs-on-chips platforms can provide tight environmental control of tissues and organs along with the physiological transport and signaling as present in the human body. These approaches offer unique advantages in studying the intercellular communications, tissue microenvironment, disease modeling and drug testing beyond the existing methods. These novel strategies complement traditional cell culture and animal model systems by providing the biomimetic niche of native tissues/organs, including multicellular architectures, tissue-tissue interfaces and spatio-temporal control of biochemical and biophysical cues. In addition, the compatibility of organs-on-chips with existing analysis methods and integrated biosensors has enabled real-time readout of crucial physiological and pathological information, thus extending their utility for biomedical applications.
While the emerging organs-on-chip technology has advanced our understanding of the cellular behaviors within the context of organ-relevant functions, much work remains to be done to fully mimic organ functions and to move toward a human-on-a-chip model with greater relevance for disease studies and drug discovery. Among these challenges, the cell source is one of the key issues for building organs-on-chips analogous with organs in the human body. Human primary cells are ideal resources to model human tissues/organs. To meet both ends, human iPSCs have been explored to rebuild organs-on-chips. Patient-specific iPSCs provide a promising cell source to engineer the disease-on-a-chip for personalized medicine. In order to study organ-organ interactions in multiorgans-on-chips, the identification of an appropriate common medium is also of great concern because the different cell types need various nutrient components when these cell lineages are assembled. To address this challenge, human plasma or serum might be a desirable substitute as supplements of culture medium for multiple organ-specific cell lineages.
In addition, the choice of material is another major concern in fabricating and designing the organs-on-chips. At present, PDMS is the most widely used material due to its ease of use, high transparency, air permeability and biocompatible features. However, PDMS can absorb small hydrophobic drugs, which might cause underestimation of drug toxicity and efficacy, thus limiting its practical utility in drug discovery. Chemical modifications of PDMS surfaces and other alternative materials are required to solve this type of problem. Furthermore, more powerful analysis and monitoring systems specifically designed or modified for microfluidic chips are required to provide comprehensive information of cell behavior, metabolism and drug responses from the organs-on-chips. The available methods, such as PCR analysis, in vivo imaging, two-photon confocal microscopy, and mass spectrometry can be further integrated with organs-on-chips for real-time monitoring, thus boosting the development of organ-on-a-chip technology for obtaining biological information. It will be necessary to develop new biomimetic microsystem, novel materials and appropriate cell sources that support the scale-up of organs-on-chips.
Although the development of engineered organs-on-chips is still in its infancy, its potential to model diseases and predict human response under physiological and pathological conditions is tremendous. The ongoing progress of this technology to simulate various cues in organ relevant microenvironments and to combine with stem cell biology and traditional biological assays will accelerate the pace toward creating a more realistic human-on-a-chip model system that is accessible, practical and robust for end users. Collectively, future success will require the collaborative efforts from academic investigators, bioengineers, industry and regulatory agencies to advance this technology to market.
Abbreviations
- ADMET:
-
Adsorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicity
- BBB:
-
Blood-brain-barrier
- EBs:
-
Embryonic body
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- ECs:
-
Endothelial cells
- EMT:
-
Epithelial-to mesenchymal
- ESCs:
-
Embryonic stem cells
- FSS:
-
Fluidic shear stress
- iPSCs:
-
Induced pluripotent stem cells
- MEMS:
-
Micro-electromechanical system
- MSC:
-
Mesenchymal stem cells
- PDMS:
-
Polydimethylsiloxane
- PK/PD:
-
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- TEER:
-
Trans-epithelial electrical resistance
References
Haeberle S, Zengerle R (2007) Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 7:1094–1110
Chin LK et al (2016) Imaging live cells at high spatiotemporal resolution for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 16:2014–2024
Young EW, Beebe DJ (2010) Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. ChemSoc Rev 39:1036–1048
Tehranirokh M et al (2013) Microfluidic devices for cell cultivation and proliferation. Biomicrofluidics 7:51502
Young EW, Simmons CA (2010) Macro- and microscale fluid flow systems for endothelial cell biology. Lab Chip 10:143–160
Bhatia SN, Ingber DE (2014) Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol 32:760–772
Sung JH et al (2013) Microfabricated mammalian organ systems and their integration into models of whole animals and humans. Lab Chip 13:1201–1212
Tseng P et al (2014) Research highlights: microtechnologies for engineering the cellular environment. Lab Chip 14:1226–1229
Williamson A (2013) The future of the patient-specific body-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 13:3471–3480
Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1998:153–184
Mcdonald JC, Whitesides GM (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Acc Chem Res 35:491–499
Effenhauser CS et al (1997) Integrated capillary electrophoresis on flexible silicone microdevices: analysis of DNA restriction fragments and detection of single DNA molecules on microchips. Anal Chem 69:3451–3457
Duffy DC et al (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984
Mcdonald JC et al (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21:27–40
Wu HK et al (2003) Fabrication of complex three- dimensional microchannel systems in PDMS. J Am Chem Soc 125:554–559
Zhang Q et al (2012) A microfluidic-base device for study of transendothelial invasion of tumor aggregates in realtiem. Lab Chip 12(16):2837–2842
Unger MA et al (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288:113–116
Balagadde FK et al (2005) Long-term monitoring of Bacteria undergoing programmed population control in a microchemostat. Science 309:137–140
Huang B (2007) Counting low-copy number proteins in a single cell. Science 315:81–84
Wen H et al (2015) A droplet microchip with substance exchange capability for the developmental study of C. elegans. Lab Chip 15(8):1905–1911
Gao X et al (2009) Microvalves actuated sandwich immunoassay on an integrated microfluidic system. Electrophoresis 30(14):2481–2487
Shi W et al (2010) Droplet microfluidics for characterizing the neurotoxin-induced responses in individual Caenorhabditiselegans. Lab Chip 10(21):2855–2863
Ni M et al (2009) Cell culture on MEMS platforms: a review. Int J Mol Sci 10(12):5411–5441
Ma LA et al (2010) A porous 3D cell culture micro device for cell migration study. Biomed Microdevices 12(4):753–760
Shi Y et al (2015) Hypoxia combined with spheroid culture improves cartilage specific function in chondrocytes. Integr Biol (Camb) 7(3):289–297
Gottwald E et al (2007) A chip-based platform for the in vitro generation of tissues in three-dimensional organization. Lab Chip 7(6):777–785
Toh YC et al (2009) A microfluidic 3D hepatocyte chip for drug toxicity testing. Lab Chip 9(14):2026–2035
Choi J et al (2011) Wnt5a-mediating neurogenesis of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells in a 3D microfluidic cell culture system. Biomaterials 32(29):7013–7022
Cate DM et al (2015) Recent developments in paper-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 87(1):19–41
Wang L et al (2015) Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beating cardiac tissues on paper. Lab Chip 15(22):4283–4290
Mosadegh B et al (2014) Three-dimensional paper-based model for cardiac ischemia. Adv Healthc Mater 3(7):1036–1043
Derda R et al (2011) Multizone paper platform for 3D cell cultures. PLoS One 6(5):e18940
Park HJ et al (2014) Paper-based bioactive scaffolds for stem cell-mediated bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 35(37):9811–9823
Mosadegh B et al (2015) A paper-based invasion assay: assessing chemotaxis of cancer cells in gradients of oxygen. Biomaterials 52:262–271
Walker GM et al (2004) Microenvironment design consideration for cellular scale studies. Lab Chip 4(2):91–97
Chung BG et al (2011) Microfluidic fabrication of microengineered hydrogels and their application in tissue engineering. Lab Chip 12(1):45–59
Ota H et al (2011) Microfluidic experimental platform for producing size-controlled three-dimensional spheroids. Sensors Actuators A Phys 169(2):266–273
Ma J et al (2016) Patterning hypoxic multicellular spheroids in a 3D matrix-a promising method for anti-tumor drug screening. Biotechnology 11(SI):127–134
Hardelauf H et al (2011) Microarrays for the scalable production of metabolically relevant tumour spheroids: a tool for modulating chemosensitivity traits. Lab Chip 11:419–428
Ruppen J et al (2015) Towards personalized medicine: chemosensitivity assays of patient lung cancer cell spheroids in a perfused microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 15:3076–3085
Kim C et al (2012) On-chip anticancer drug test of regular tumor spheroids formed in microwells by a distributive microchannel network. Lab Chip 12:4135–4142
Tekin H et al (2010) Stimuli-responsive microwells for formation and retrieval of cell aggregates. Lab Chip 10:2411–2418
Karimi M et al (2016) Microfluidic systems for stem cell-based neural tissue engineering. Lab Chip 16:2551–2571
No DY et al (2015) 3D liver models on a microplatform: well-defined culture, engineering of liver tissue and liver-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 15:3822–3837
Lee J et al (2016) A 3D alcoholic liver disease model on a chip. Integr Biol 8:302–308
Kim C et al (2011) 3-dimensional cell culture for on-chip differentiation of stem cells in embryoid body. Lab Chip 11:874–882
Khademhosseini A, Nichol JW (2009) Modular tissue engineering: engineering biological tissues from the bottom up. Soft Matter 5(7):1312–1319
Chung BG et al (2012) Microfluidic fabrication of microengineered hydrogels and their application in tissue engineering. Lab Chip 12:45–59
Yamada M et al (2015) Cell-sized condensed collagen microparticles for preparing microengineered composite spheroids of primary hepatocytes. Lab Chip 15:3941–3951
Yu Y et al (2014) Flexible fabrication of biomimetic bamboo-like hybrid microfibers. Adv Mater 26(16):2494–2499
Yue Y et al (2016) Simple spinning of heterogeneous hollow microfiber on Chip. Adv Mater 28(31):6649–6655
Zhang X et al (2015) Flexible fabrication of shape-controlled collagen building blocks for self-assembly of 3D microtissues. Small 11(30):3666–3675
Goldbrunner RH et al (1999) Cell-extracellular matrix interaction in glioma invasion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(3):295–305
Ingber DE, Folkman J (1989) Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 109:317–330
Baker BM et al (2013) Microfluidics embedded within extracellular matrix to define vascular architectures and pattern diffusive gradients. Lab Chip 13(16):3246–3252
Choi NW et al (2007) Microfluidic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 6(11):908–915
Haessler U et al (2009) An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies for 3D chemotaxis studies. Biomed Microdevices 11(4):827–835
Joanne Wang C et al (2008) A microfluidics-based turning assay reveals complex growth cone responses to integrated gradients of substrate-bound ECM molecules and diffusible guidance cues. Lab Chip 8(2):227–237
Lanfer B et al (2008) Aligned fibrillar collagen matrices obtained by shear flow deposition. Biomaterials 29(28):3888–3895
Lanfer B et al (2009) The growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells cultured on aligned collagen matrices. Biomaterials 30(30):5950–5958
Chin VI et al (2004) Microfabricated platform for studying stem cell fates. Biotechnol Bioeng 88(3):399–415
Ma H et al (2012) Probing the role of mesenchymal stem cells in salivary gland cancer on biomimeticmicrodevices. Integr Biol (Camb) 4(5)):522–530
Zhang Q et al (2012) A microfluidic-based device for study of transendothelialinvasion of tumor aggregates in real-time. Lab Chip 12(16):2837–2842
Tong Z et al (2014) Engineering a functional neuro-muscular junction model in a chip. RSC Adv 4:54788–54797
Chung BG et al (2006) A microfluidic multi-injector for gradient generation. Lab Chip 6:764–768
Kim S et al (2010) Biological applications of microfluidic gradient devices. Integr Biol 2:584–603
Ye N et al (2007) Cell-based high content screening using an integrated microfluidic device. Lab Chip 7(12):1696–1704
Jeon NL et al (2000) Generation of solution and surface gradients using microfluidic systems. Langmuir 16:8311–8316
Li Y et al (2010) The effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor on the proliferation of chondrocytes embedded in the collagen gel using an integrated microfluidic device. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 16(6):1267–1275
Jeon NL et al (2002) Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device. Nat Biotechnol 20:826–830
Han S et al (2012) A versatile assay for monitoring in vivo-like transendothelial migration of neutrophils. Lab Chip 12(20):3861–3865
Shin Y et al (2011) In vitro 3D collective sprouting angiogenesis under orchestrated ANG-1 and VEGF gradients. Lab Chip 11:2175–2181
Jeong GS et al (2011) Sprouting angiogenesis under a chemical gradient regulated by interactions with an endothelial monolayer in a microfluidic platform. Anal Chem 83:8454–8459
Torisawa YS et al (2010) Microfluidic platform for chemotaxis in gradients formed by CXCL2 source-sink cells. Integr Biol 2:680–686
Dings J et al (1998) Clinical experience with 118 brain tissue oxygen partial pressure catheter probes. Neurosurgery 43:1082–1095
Evans SM et al (2004) Hypoxia is important in the biology and aggression of human glial brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10:8177–8184
Lo JF et al (2010) Oxygen gradient for open well cellular culture via microfluidic substrates. Lab Chip 10(18):2394–2401
Wang L et al (2013) Construction of oxygen and chemical concentration gradients in a single microfluidic device for studying tumor cell–drug interactions in a dynamic hypoxia microenvironment. Lab Chip 13(4):695–705
Oppegard SC, Eddington DT (2013) A microfabricated platform for establishing oxygen gradients in 3-D constructs. Biomed Microdevices 15(3):407–414
Yang W et al (2015) A novel microfluidic platform for studying mammalian cell chemotaxis in different oxygen environments under zero-flow conditions. Biomicrofluidics 9(4):044121
Chen YA et al (2011) Generation of oxygen gradients in microfluidic devices for cell culture using spatially confined chemicalreactions. Lab Chip 1(21):3626–3633
Derda R et al (2009) Paper-supported 3D cell culture for tissue-based bioassays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18457–18462
Widmaier EP et al (2004) In: Fox SI (ed) Human physiology, 9th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 375–466
Griffith LG, Swartz MA (2006) Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:211–224
Kim L et al (2006) Microfluidic arrays for logarithmically perfused embryonic stem cell culture. Lab Chip 6:394–406
Lu H et al (2004) Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion. Anal Chem 76:5257–5264
van der Meer AD et al (2009) Microfluidic technology in vascular research. J Biomed Biotechnol:823148
Zhong W et al (2013) Mesenchymal stem cell and chondrocyte fates in a multishear microdevice are regulated by yes-associated protein. Stem Cells Dev 22(14):2083–2093
Wang L et al (2016) Human induced pluripotent stem cells derived endothelial cells mimicking vascular inflammatory response under flow. Biomicrofluidics 10(1):014106
McCue S et al (2004) Shear-induced reorganization of endothelial cell cytoskeleton and adhesion complexes. Trends Cardiovasc Med 14(4):143–151
Jang KJ et al (2011) Fluid-shearstress-induced translocation of aquaporin-2 and reorganization of actin cytoskeleton in renal tubular epithelial cells. Integr Biol 3:134–141
Jang KJ et al (2010) A multi-layer microfluidic device for efficient culture and analysis of renal tubular cells. Lab Chip 10:36–42
Zhou M et al (2014) Induction of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in proximal tubular epithelial cells on microfluidic devices. Biomaterials 35(5):1390–1401
Song JW, Munn LL (2011) Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(37):15342–15347
Douville NJ et al (2011) Combination of fluid and solid mechanical stresses contribute to cell death and detachment in a microfluidic alveolar model. Lab Chip 11:609–619
Vlahakis NE et al (1999) Stretch induces cytokine release by alveolar epithelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 277:L167–L173
Tschumperlin DJ et al (2000) Deformationinduced injury of alveolar epithelial cells: effect of frequency, duration, and amplitude. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:357–362
Bilek AM et al (2003) Mechanisms of surface-tensioninduced epithelial cell damage in a model of pulmonary airway reopening. J Appl Physiol 94:770–783
Huh D et al (2007) Acoustically detectable cellular-level lung injury induced by fluid mechanical stresses in microfluidic airway systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18886–18891
Hubatsch I et al (2007) Determination of drug permeability and prediction of drug absorption in Caco-2 monolayers. Nat Protoc 2(9):2111–2119
Kimura H et al (2008) An integrated microfluidic system for long-term perfusion culture and on-line monitoring of intestinal tissue models. Lab Chip 8(5):741–746
Imura Y et al (2009) A microfluidic system to evaluate intestinal absorption. Anal Sci 25(12):1403–1407
Kim HJ et al (2012) Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip 12:2165–2174
Kim HJ, Ingber DE (2013) Gut-on-a-chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation. Integr Biol (Camb) 5:1130–1140
Gao X et al (2011) A simple elastic membrane-based microfluidic chip for the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells under tensile stress. Electrophoresis 32(23):3431–3436
Oleaga C et al (2016) Multi-organ toxicity demonstration in a functional human in vitro system system composed of four organs. Sci Rep 6:20030
Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373
El-Ali J et al (2006) Cells in chips. Nature 442(7101):403–411
Huh D et al (2012) Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on-Chip. Lab Chip 12(12):2156–2164
van der Meer AD, van den Berg A (2012) Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol (Camb) 4(5):461–470
Ghaemmaghami AM et al (2012) Biomimetic tissues on a chip for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 17(3–4):173–181
Huh D et al (2011) From three-dimensional cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol 21(12):745–754
Steimer A et al (2005) Cell culture models of the respiratory tract relevant to pulmonary drug delivery. J Aerosol Med 18(2):137–182
Tavana H et al (2001) Epithelium damage and protection during reopening of occluded airways in a physiologic microfluidic pulmonary airway model. Biomed Microdevices 13(4):731–742
Huh D et al (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328(5986):1662–1668
Huh D et al (2012) A human disease model of drug toxicity-induced pulmonary edema in a lung-on-a-chip microdevice. Sci Transl Med 4(159):159ra147
Fagerholm U et al (1996) Comparison between permeability coefficients in rat and human jejunum. Pharm Res 13(9):1336–1342
Kim SH et al (2013) A microfluidic device with 3-d hydrogel villi scaffold to simulate intestinal absorption. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 13(11):7220–7228
Gan LSL, Thakker DR (1997) Applications of the Caco-2 model in the design and development of orally active drugs: elucidation of biochemical and physical barriers posed by the intestinal epithelium. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23:77–98
Ramadan Q et al (2013) NutriChip: nutrition analysis meets microfluidics. Lab Chip 13(2):196–203
Sung JH et al (2011) Microscale 3-D hydrogel scaffold for biomimetic gastrointestinal (GI) tract model. Lab Chip 11(3):389–392
Li L et al (2012) A microfluidic in vitro system for the quantitative study of the stomach mucus barrier function. Lab Chip 12(20):4071–4079
Yoon ND et al (2015) 3D liver models on a microplatform: well-defined culture, engineering of liver tissue and liver-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 15(19):3822–3837
Bhise NS et al (2016) A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids. Biofabrication 8(1):014101
Lee J et al (2014) Fabrication and characterization of microfluidic liver-on-a-chip using microsomal enzymes. Lab Chip 14(17):3290–3299
Lee PJ et al (2007) An artificial liver sinusoid with a microfluidic endothelial-like barrier for primary hepatocyte culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(5):1340–1346
Kang IK et al (2004) Co-culture of hepatocytes and fibroblasts by micropatterned immobilization of beta-galactose derivatives. Biomaterials 25(18):4225–4232
Zinchenko YS, Coger RN (2005) Engineering micropatterned surfaces for the coculture of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 75(1):242–248
Ho CT et al (2013) Liver-cell patterning lab chip: mimicking the morphology of liver lobule tissue. Lab Chip 13(18):3578–3587
Ho CT et al (2006) Rapid heterogeneous liver-cell on-chip patterning via the enhanced field-induced dielectrophoresis trap. Lab Chip 6(6):724–734
Malinen MM et al (2014) Differentiation of liver progenitor cell line to functional organotypiccultures in 3D nanofibrillar cellulose and hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels. Biomaterials 35(19):5110–5121
Lee KH et al (2011) Diffusion-mediated in situ alginate encapsulation of cell spheroids using microscale concave well and nanoporous membrane. Lab Chip 11(6):1168–1167
Gieseck RL 3rd et al (2014) Maturation of induced pluripotent stem cell derived hepatocytes by 3D-culture. PLoS One 9(1):e86372
Achilli TM et al (2012) Advances in the formation, use and understanding of multi-cellular spheroids. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12(10):1347–1360
Jun Y et al (2013) 3D co-culturing model of primary pancreatic islets and hepatocytes in hybrid spheroid to overcome pancreatic cell shortage. Biomaterials 34(15):3784–3794
Wong SF et al (2011) Concave microwell based size-controllable hepatosphere as a three-dimensional liver tissue model. Biomaterials 32(32):8087–8096
Goral VN et al (2010) Perfusion-based microfluidic device for three-dimensional dynamic primary human hepatocyte cell culture in the absence of biological or synthetic matrices or coagulants. Lab Chip 10(24):3380–3386
Miki T et al (2011) Hepatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells is promoted by three-dimensional dynamic perfusion culture conditions. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17(5):557–568
Lee SA et al (2013) Spheroid-based three-dimensional liver-on-a-chip to investigate hepatocyte-hepatic stellate cell interactions and flow effects. Lab Chip 13(18):3529–3537
Dash A et al (2013) Hemodynamic flow improves rat hepatocyte morphology, function, and metabolic activity in vitro. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 304(11):C1053–C1063
Trietsch SJ et al (2013) Microfluidic titer plate for stratified 3D cell culture. Lab Chip 13(18):3548–3554
Nakao Y et al (2011) Bile canaliculi formation by aligning rat primary hepatocytes in a microfluidic device. Biomicrofluidics 5(2):22212
Esch MB et al (2015) Multi-cellular 3D human primary liver cell culture elevates metabolic activity under fluidic flow. Lab Chip 15(10):2269–2277
Tanaka Y et al (2007) A micro-spherical heart pump powered by cultured cardiomyocytes. Lab Chip 7:207–212
Aung A et al (2016) 3D cardiac μtissues within a microfluidic device with real-time contractile stress readout. Lab Chip 16(1):153–162
Morimoto Y et al (2016) Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived fiber-shaped cardiac tissue on a chip. Lab Chip 16(12):2295–2301
Khademhosseini A et al (2007) Microfluidic patterning for fabrication of contractile cardiac organoids. Biomed Microdevices 9(2):149–157
Visone R et al (2016) Cardiac meets skeletal: what’s new in microfluidic models for muscle tissue engineering. Molecules 21(9):piiE1128
Radisic M et al (2007) Biomimetic approach to cardiac tissue engineering. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 362:1357–1136
Grosberg A et al (2011) Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study heart on a chip. Lab Chip 11(24):4165–4173
Effron MB et al (1987) Changes in myosin isoenzymes, ATPase activity, and contraction duration in rat cardiac muscle with aging can be modulated by thyroxine. Circ Res 60(2):238–245
Agarwal A et al (2013) Microfluidic heart on a chip for higher throughput pharmacological studies. Lab Chip 13:3599–3608
Serena E et al (2012) Micro-arrayed human embryonic stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes for in vitro functional assay. PLoS One 7(11):e48483
Kensah G et al (2013) Murine and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac bodies form contractile myocardial tissue in vitro. Eur Heart J 34:1134–1146
Bergstrom G et al (2015) Stem cell derived in vivo-like human cardiac bodies in a microfluidic device for toxicity testing by beating frequency imaging. Lab Chip 15:3242–3249
Aung A et al (2016) 3D cardiac mutissues within a microfluidic device with real-time contractile stress readout. Lab Chip 16:153–162
Mathur A et al (2015) Human iPSC-based cardiac microphysiological system for drug screening applications. Sci Rep 5:8883
Mathur A et al (2016) In vitro cardiac tissue models: current status and future prospects. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 96:203–213
Booth R, Kim H (2012) Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (mBBB). Lab Chip 12:1784–1792
Achyuta AK et al (2013) A modular approach to create a neurovascular unit-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 13:542–553
Wikswo JP et al (2013) Scaling and systems biology for integrating multiple organs-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 13:3496–3511
Abaci HE, Shuler ML (2015) Human-on-a-chip design strategies and principles for physiologically based pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling. Integr Biol (Camb) 7(4):383–391
vanMidwoud PM et al (2010) A microfluidic approach for in vitro assessment of interorgan interactions in drug metabolism using intestinal and liver slices. Lab Chip 10:2778–2786
Wagner I et al (2013) A dynamic multi-organ-chip for long-term cultivation and substance testing proven by 3D human liver and skin tissue co-culture. Lab Chip 13(18):3538–3547
Materne EM et al (2015) A multi-organ chip co-culture of neurospheres and liver equivalentsfor long-term substance testing. J Biotechnol 205:36–46
Sung JH, Shuler ML (2009) A micro cell culture analog (microCCA) with 3-D hydrogel culture of multiple cell lines to assess metabolism-dependent cytotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs. Lab Chip 9(10):1385–1394
Esch MB et al (2014) Body-on-a chip simulation with gastrointestinal tract and liver tissues suggests that ingested nanoparticles have the potential to cause liver injury. Lab Chip 14(16):3081–3092
Maschmeyer I et al (2015) A four-organ-chip for interconnected long-term co-culture of human intestine, liver, skin and kidney equivalents. Lab Chip 15(12):2688–2699
Zhang C et al (2009) Towards a human-on-chip: culturing multiple cell types on a chip with compartmentalized microenvironments. Lab Chip 9:3185–3192
Odijk M et al (2015) Measuring direct current trans-epithelial electrical resistance in organ-on microsystem. Lab Chip 15(3):745–752
Benam KH et al (2016) Small airway-on-a-chip enables analysis of human lung inflammation and drug responses in vitro. Nat Methods 13(2):151–157
Park J et al (2015) Three-dimensional brain-on-a-chip with an interstitial level of flow and its application as an in vitro model of Alzheimer’s disease. Lab Chip 15(1):141–150
Ma H et al (2013) Biomimetic tumor microenvironment on a microfluidic platform. Biomicrofluidics 7(1):11501
Kuo CT et al (2014) Modeling of cancer metastasis and drug resistance via biomimeticnanocilial and microfluidics. Biomaterials 35(5):1562–1571
Choi Y et al (2015) A microengineered pathophysiological model of early-stage breast cancer. Lab Chip 15(16):3350–3357
Xu H et al (2015) Activation of hypoxia signaling induces phenotypic transformation of glioma cells: implications for bevacizumab antiangiogenic therapy. Oncotarget 6(14):11882–11893
Li CY et al (2013) Flow-based pipeline for systematic modulation and analysis of 3D tumor microenvironments. Lab Chip 13:1969–1978
Zervantonakis IK et al (2012) Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:13515–13520
Moya ML et al (2013) In vitro perfused human capillary networks. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19:730–737
Businaro L et al (2013) Cross talk between cancer and immune cells: exploring complex dynamics in a microfluidic environment. Lab Chip 13:229–239
Aref AR et al (2013) Screening therapeutic EMT blocking agents in a three-dimensional microenvironment. Integr Biol (Camb) 5:381–389
Vidi PA et al (2014) Disease-on-a-chip: mimicry of tumor growth in mammary ducts. Lab Chip 14:172–177
Tatosian DA, Shuler ML (2009) A novel system for evaluation of drug mixtures for potential efficacy in treating multidrug resistant cancers. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:187–198
Berdichevsky Y et al (2010) Building and manipulating neural pathways with microfluidics. Lab Chip 10:999–1004
Xu H et al (2016) A dynamic in vivo-like organotypic blood-brain barrier model to probe metastatic brain tumors. Sci Rep 6:36670
Lippmann ES et al (2012) Derivation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 30:783–791
Deracinois B et al (2013) Glial-cell-mediated re-induction of the blood-brain barrier phenotype in brain capillary endothelial cells: a differential gel electrophoresis study. Proteomics 13:1185–1199
Choucha-Snouber L et al (2013) Investigation of ifosfamide nephrotoxicity induced in a liver–kidney co-culture biochip. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:597–608
McCain ML et al (2013) Recapitulating maladaptive, multiscale remodeling of failing myocardium on a chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9770–9775
Thavandiran N et al (2013) Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E4698–E4707
ChouchaSnouber L et al (2013) Metabolomics-on-a-chip of hepatotoxicity induced by anticancer drug flutamide and its active metabolite hydroxyflutamide using HepG2/ C3a microfluidic biochips. Toxicol Sci 132:8–20
Shintu L et al (2012) Metabolomics-on-a-chip and predictive systems toxicology in microfluidic bioartificial organs. Anal Chem 84:1840–1848
Mahler GJ et al (2009) Characterization of a gastrointestinal tract microscale cell culture analog used to predict drug toxicity. Biotechnol Bioeng 104(1):193–205
Sung JH et al (2010) A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model on a chip. Lab Chip 10(4):446–455
Li Z et al (2016) Assessment of metabolism-dependent drug efficacy and toxicity on a multilayer organs-on-a-chip. Integr Biol (Camb) 8(10):1022–1029
Cong X et al (2015) Early life experience and gut microbiome: the brain-gut-microbiota signaling system. Adv Neonatal Care 5(5):314–323
Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2012) Regulation of the stress response by the gut microbiota: implications for psychoneuroendocrinology. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37(9):1369–1378
Kim HJ et al (2016) Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth andinflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(1):E7–E15
Booth R, Kim H (2014) Permeability analysis of neuroactive drugs through a dynamic microfluidic in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Annals Biomed Engineering 42:2379–2391
Deosarkar SP et al (2015) A novel dynamic neonatal blood- brain barrier on a Chip. PLoS One 10(11):e0142725
Wang G et al (2014) Modeling the mitochondrial cardiomyopathy of Barth syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cell and heart-on-chip technologies. Nature Med 20:616–623
Alford PW et al (2010) Biohybrid thin films for measuring contractility in engineered cardiovascular muscle. Biomaterials 31(13):3613–3621
Punde TH et al (2015) A biologically inspired lung-on-a-chip device for the study of protein induced lung inflammation. IntegrBiol (Camb) 7(2):162–169
Jang KJ et al (2013) Human kidney proximal tubule-on-a-chip for drug transport and nephrotoxicity assessment. IntegrBiol (Camb). 5(9):1119–1129
Zhou M et al (2016) Development of a functional Glomerulus at the organ level on a Chip to mimic hypertensive nephropathy. Sci Rep 6:31771
Zhou Q et al (2015) Liver injury-on-a-chip: microfluidic co-cultures with integrated biosensors for monitoring liver cell signaling during injury. Lab Chip 15(23):4467–4478
Kang YB et al (2015) Liver sinusoid on a chip: long-term layered co-culture of primary rat hepatocytes and endothelial cells in microfluidic platforms. BiotechnolBioeng 112(12):2571–2582
Schimek K et al (2013) Integrating biological vasculature into a multi-organ-chip microsystem. Lab Chip 13(18):3588–3598
Hsu YH et al (2013) A microfluidic platform for generating large-scale nearly identical human microphysiological vascularized tissue arrays. Lab Chip 13(15):2990–2998
Wang X et al (2016) Engineering anastomosis between living capillary networks and endothelial cell-lined microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 16(2):282–290
Oleaga C et al (2016) Multi-organ toxicity demonstration in a functional human in vitro system composed of four organs. Sci Rep 6:20030
Frey O et al (2014) Reconfigurable microfluidic hanging drop network for multi-tissue interaction and analysis. Nat Commun 5:4250
Loskill P et al (2015) μOrgano: a Lego®-like Plug & Play System for Modular Multi-Organ-Chips. PLoS One 10(10):e0139587
Rigat-Brugarolas LG et al (2014) A functional microengineered model of the human splenon-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 14(10):1715–1724
Adriani G et al (2017) A 3D neurovascular microfluidic model consisting of neurons, astrocytes and cerebral endothelial cells as ablood-brain barrier. Lab Chip 17(3):448–459
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA16020900, XDPB0305), National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 91543121, 31671038, 81573394, 81803492), National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFB0405400), Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFZD-SW-213), Innovation Program of Science and Research from the DICP, CAS (DICP TMSR201601).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, L., Li, Z., Xu, C., Qin, J. (2019). Bioinspired Engineering of Organ-on-Chip Devices. In: Perrett, S., Buell, A., Knowles, T. (eds) Biological and Bio-inspired Nanomaterials. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1174. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9791-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9791-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9790-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9791-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)