Keywords

1 Introduction

Aluminium matrix composites lead the race among the metal matrix composites in current research and utilization due to its low cost, ease of production and other attractive properties such as high specific strength, high specific stiffness, the low thermal coefficient of expansion, improved tribological and corrosion resistance. Due to such incredible properties, aluminium matrix composites have attracted great scientific attention as the promising candidate which is used in wide range of applications includes recreation, sports, packaging, precision instruments, biotechnology, automotive, aerospace, military, nuclear, electronic thermal management and marine industries [1,2,3,4]. In the fabrication of corrosive and cryogenic environment application products like Arctic chemical processing equipment, Moss- and SPB-type tanks (LNG carrier insulation systems), subsea pipelines, pressure vessels and drill pipes (offshore structures) aluminium metal matrix composite play a vital role [5]. Aluminium composites are fabricated through various techniques such as centrifugal casting, squeeze casting, powder metallurgy, stir casting (ex situ) and reactive processing (in situ) [6]. Fabrication of the aluminium metal matrix composites through in situ route provides several advantages such as ease of production, economical, grain refinement, thermodynamic stability, uniform distribution of reinforcements, the excellent bonding strength between matrix and reinforcement. ZrB2 owns fabulous properties such as high melting temperature, good thermal conductivity, excellent mechanical properties, oxidation resistance, elastic modulus and resistance to chemical attack [7]. In situ formed ZrB2 was fabricated in aluminium alloy through reaction of K2ZrF6 and KBF4 with molten aluminium alloy. The fine and homogeneous distribution of ZrB2 particles in aluminium alloy was confirmed through micro-structural studies and due to the incorporation of the in situ ZrB2 particles, the mechanical properties of the aluminium alloy were amplified [8]. The AA 2618 matrix was reinforced with AlN, Si3N4, and ZrB2 (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8), and the ZrB2 has been synthesized in AA 2618 matrix through in situ stir casting technique by mixing K2ZrF6 and KBF4 in molten AA 2618 alloy. Increase in the percentage of ZrB2 enhanced the corrosion resistance in aluminium composite [9].

From the above literature survey, it is clear that the aluminium matrix composites are used in real-time application which requires corrosion resistance and the addition of reinforcements in aluminium matrix had cemented the route for the enrichment of corrosion resistance. The in situ stir casting technique offers the fine and homogeneous distribution of reinforcements in aluminium matrix economical approach. In this paper, AA 8011-ZrB2 (0, 4 and 8 wt%) is synthesized through in situ stir casting technique and the synthesized materials are involved in X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to study the presence and distribution of the ZrB2 particles. Corrosion behaviour of the samples was investigated through the potentiodynamic polarization technique.

2 Experimental Procedure

2.1 Fabrication of Materials

AA 8011 was tested to confirm the material compositions as per the ASTM-B-209 M, given in Table 1. The composite system of AA 8011-ZrB2 (0, 4 and 8 wt%) was fabricated by using an in situ stir casting technique. AA 8011 rods were heated in the graphite crucible at the temperature of 860°. Stoichiometrically, calculated halide salts (K2ZrF6 and KBF4) as given in Table 2 were added to the molten form of aluminium which was preheated at the temperature of 250 °C for the removal of moisture. Stirring was carried out for every 5 min by using graphite rod to distribute the halide salts homogeneously and the time allowed for completion of the reaction is 30 min. During these processes, exothermic reactions take place between the halide salts and aluminium matrix is shown (1), (2) and (3)

$$ 3{\text{K}}_{2} {\text{ZrF}}_{6} + 13{\text{Al}} \to 3{\text{Al}}_{3} {\text{Zr}} + 2{\text{K}}_{3} {\text{AlF}}_{6} + 2{\text{Al}} $$
(1)
$$ 6{\text{KBF}}_{4} + 9{\text{Al}} \to 3{\text{AlB}}_{2} + 2{\text{K}}_{3} {\text{AlF}}_{6} + 4{\text{AlF}}_{3} $$
(2)
$$ {\text{AlB}}_{2} + {\text{Al}}_{3} {\text{Zr}} \to {\text{ZrB}}_{2} + 4{\text{Al}} $$
(3)
Table 1 Chemical composition of AA 8011 alloy (%)
Table 2 Quantity of halide salts added for obtaining various compositions of materials

After the completion of the in situ reaction, elements other than ZrB2 were evaporated or removed as slag and the process parameters were decided through literature reviews of [8].

2.2 Corrosion Study

The electrochemical corrosion behaviour of AA 8011-ZrB2 (0, 4 and 8 wt%) was investigated by potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) technique in 3 wt% of sodium chloride solution using IVIUM electrochemical workstation with the three electrode system. The calomel electrode as reference, graphite as counter electrode and the sample under test acted as the working electrode. The PDP curves were obtained in the potential range of −500 to +500 mV with reference to OCP with the scan rate of 1 mV/s. The Tafel extrapolation was used to calculate the E-Corr and i-Corr values from the PDP curves which is helpful to evaluate the corrosion resistance of the synthesized aluminium materials.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffractogram of AA 8011-0 wt% ZrB2, AA 8011-4 wt% ZrB2 and AA 8011-8 wt% ZrB2 which were performed in RINGKU X-ray diffraction machine. The peak intensities of (002), (022), (113) aluminium rise with the increasing addition of ZrB2. This denotes that ZrB2 acts as a pinning particle to arrest the grain growth of aluminium which leads to smaller crystallite size. The ZrB2 appears at the vicinity of 2θ positions (24.99), (32.39), (41.45), (73.90) which confirms the presence of reinforced ZrB2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

X-Ray diffraction results of as casted AA-8011 and composites

3.2 Micro-Structural Analysis

The microstructure of the fabricated composite system was studied through HITACHI SU 3000 SEM machine and the SEM images are shown in Fig. 2a–e. Figure 2a clearly indicates the absence of ZrB2 particles along the grain boundaries, but the presence of ZrB2 along the grain boundaries of the aluminium matrix is observed in Fig. 2b–c some particles were observed along the grain boundaries of AA 8011-4 wt% ZrB2 and AA 8011-8 wt% ZrB2. The magnified SEM image of the particles of Fig. 2c was captured and the magnified view is shown in Fig. 2d which evidently proved as ZrB2 particles by the spectrum (Fig. 2e) and it shows the peaks of Al, Zr and B which were obtained from energy dispersive can be observed clearly and their percentages are given in Table 3. The distribution of the ZrB2 is uniform and homogeneous along the grain boundaries of aluminium matrix and both AA 8011-4 wt% ZrB2 and AA 8011-8 wt% ZrB2 which is evidently visible Fig. 2b–c. The uniform distribution of the ceramic particles in aluminium matrix is significantly influenced by the density difference between the ceramic particles and aluminium particles. When the density difference between the ceramic particle and aluminium matrix is greater than 2 g/cm3 during solidification, this makes ceramic particles to sink easily in molten aluminium and to be suspended for a long time. The density difference between the molten AA 8011 matrix and in situ formed ZrB2 is more than 2 g/cm3 which paves the way for the uniform distribution of ZrB2 along the grain boundaries. Also, the wetting property between the ceramic particles and molten aluminium matrix arrests the movement of ZrB2 particles which leading to the long-time suspension of ZrB2 particles in molten aluminium matrix during solidification for better distribution of ceramic particles [10].

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of a AA8011, b AA8011- 4 wt% ZrB2, c AA8011-8 wt% ZrB2, d magnified SEM image of ZrB2, e energy dispersive spectroscopy of Fig. 2d

Table 3 Elemental analysis of energy dispersive spectroscopy
Fig. 3
figure 3

Potentiodynamic polarization curves of the samples, a AA8011-0 wt% ZrB2, b AA8011-4 wt% ZrB2 and c AA8011-8 wt% ZrB2

3.3 Electrochemical Studies

3.3.1 Potentiodynamic Polarization

The corrosion behaviour was studied by potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) test conducted by exposing the surface area of 0.5 mm2 in sodium chloride solution. The PDP curves for aluminium samples are shown in Fig. 3a–c it clearly says that the curve is shifting right side to left side with the addition in the percentage of reinforcement and this demonstrates the decrement in i-corr value. The corrosion current density or i-Corr values reveal the flow of current in open circuit potential as a result of the reduction reaction. The i-Corr values are inversely proportional to the corrosion resistance. Corrosion potential (E-Corr) values demonstrate the ionization tendency of a material in NaCl solution [11, 12]. The E-Corr and i-Corr values are tabulated in Table 4 which undoubtedly establishes that the increase in the percentage of ZrB2 is inversely proportional to the i-corr value. Also, the corrosion rate in AA 8011 alloy is reduced from 1.156 to 0.8672 by reinforcing it with the ceramic of ZrB2 is evident that addition of ZrB2 will enhance the corrosion resistance [9]. Because the ZrB2 possess the excellent chemical inertness which provides excellent resistance to chemical attack, oxidation and corrosion [8].

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM image of corroded surfaces of AA8011 matrix composites with ZrB2 reinforcement, a 0 wt%, b 4 wt%, and c 8 wt%

Table 4 Experimental results obtained from potentiodynamic polarization curves

Figure 1 confirms the presence of ZrB2 and the SEM images that were captured as shown in Fig. 2b–c that the reinforcement is unvaryingly distributed along the grain of AA 8011 alloy which is essential for improving corrosion resistance. The SEM images that captured in the corrosion surfaces are shown in Fig. 4a–c supports the previous statement depicts that addition of ZrB2 in aluminium alloy has clearly arrested the corrosion. Figure 4a displays that AA 8011 had been severely corroded in the NaCl solution but Fig. 4b–c reveals that AA 8011-4 wt% ZrB2 and AA 8011-8 wt% ZrB2 had shown resistance to corrosion in NaCl solution.

4 Conclusion

  1. 1.

    The AA 8011-ZrB2 (0, 4 and 8 wt%) was successfully fabricated through in situ stir casting technique.

  2. 2.

    Corrosion behaviour of fabricated aluminium samples AA 8011-ZrB2 (0, 4 and 8 wt%) was investigated in sodium chloride environment and evaluated by using potentiodynamic polarization technique with reference to open circuit potential by using three electrochemical cell system.

  3. 3.

    The presence of ZrB2 was confirmed by XRD analysis and energy dispersive spectroscopy.

  4. 4.

    The homogeneous distribution of ZrB2 along the grain boundaries of aluminium was confirmed through SEM images.

  5. 5.

    The corrosion resistance was improved in AA 8011 by the inclusion of ZrB2 and the AA8011-8 wt% ZrB2 exhibits the superiority in corrosion resistance.