Abstract
With interest in social institutions expanding, and the centering of attention on state as an institution that is essentially cultural, a major interest in recent literature on ethnicity studies is on people, communities, and societies – (i) as collective actors in relation with the state as the sovereign authority and (ii) the process of interface between the state and the ethnic groups that constitute the ethno-demographic profile of the state. This, on one hand, has brought a shift in the focus on state and the modern state-system in studies on ethnic conflict, from the conventional perspective that viewed ethnic conflicts as a condition under state failure. On the other hand, the emphasis on the cultural base of the state has brought the state-system into the core of the state-society causal argument, driving interactive processes. An important condition that underlies the state-ethnic group(s) causal interface is the perceived inequalities of communities. It is this that can become a condition for likelihood of ethnic conflict. Political representation, beyond the domain of electoral politics, is an important nonmilitary institutional strategy for expressing perceived inequalities and for negotiating conflict in ethnically divided societies. With movements and protests becoming central to state-society interactive processes, this chapter looks at power sharing and political bargaining as an institutional strategy that ethnic groups employ for addressing their grievances, particularly in diverse societies. The chapter is based on a study carried out in India. It redraws the focus away from formal structures to various methods of power sharing that run through all levels of society and the role played by civil society organizations, interest groups, and ethno-political organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagchi A (2000) ‘Rethinking Federalism’: overview of current debates with some reflections in Indian context. Econ Polit Wkly 35(34):3025–3036
Banerjee M (2017) Why India votes? Routledge, New Delhi
Beteille A (2011) The institutions of democracy. Econ Polit Wkly 46(29):75–84
Carciumaru R (ed) (2015) Negotiating conflict and accommodating identity in South Asia. Samskriti, New Delhi
Cederman L-E, Wimmer A, Min B (2010) Why do ethnic-nationalist groups Rebel: New data and analysis. World Polit 62(1):87–119
Cederman LE, Weidmann NB, Gleditsch KS (2011) Horizontal inequalities and ethnonationalist civil war: a global comparison. Am Polit Sci Rev 105(3):478–495
Cederman LE, Gleditsch KS, Buhaug H (2013) Inequality, grievances, and civil war. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chandhoke N (2005) Revisiting the crisis of representation thesis: the Indian context. Democratization 12(3):308–330
Christin T, Hug S (2012) Federalism, the geographic location of groups, and conflict. Conflict Manag Peace Sci 29(1):93–122
Collier P, Hoeffler A (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxf Econ Pap 56(4):563–595
Dovi S (2006) Political representation. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/political-representation/
Fearon JD, Laitin DD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(1):75–90
Kashyap SC (2004) Executive–legislature interface in the Indian polity. J Legis Stud 10(2–3): 278–294
Kholi A (ed) (1998) India’s democracy: an analysis of changing state-society relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Kuhn PM, Weidmann NB (2015) Unequal we fight: between- and within-group inequality and ethnic civil war. Polit Sci Res Methods 3(3):543–568
Lacina B (2014) How governments shape the risk of civil violence: India’s federal reorganization, 1950–56. Am J Polit Sci 58(3):720–738
Lama-Rewal ST (2009) Studying elections in India: scientific and political debates. Retrieved from South Asia Multidiscip Acad J. http://samaj.revues.org/2784
Manor J (1996) ‘Ethnicity’ and politics in India’. Int Aff 72(3):459–475
Mehta PB (2007) The rise of judicial sovereignty. J Democr 18(2):70–83
Mehta PB (2012) State and democracy in India. Polish Sociol Rev. Polish Sociological Association 178:203–225
Pitkin HF (1967) The concept of representation. University of California, Berkeley
Rao PP (2005) Separation of powers in a democracy: the Indian experience. Peace Res 37(1): 113–122
Saward M (2010) The representative claim. Oxford University Press, New York
Sekher M, Parasuraman S, Kattumuri R (eds) (2018) Governance and governed: multi-country perspectives on state, society and development. Springer, Singapore
Singh MP, Verney DV (2003) Challenges to India’s centralized parliamentary federalism. Publius: J Fed 33(4):1–20
Srikrishna BN (2011) Beyond federalism. India Int Centre Q 38(3/4):386–407
Tillin L (2018) Federalism and democracy in today’s India. Econ Polit Wkly 53(33):49–53
Vogt M (2011) A new dawn? Indigenous movements and ethnic inclusion in Latin America. Int Stud Q 60(4):790–801
Weiner M (1989) The Indian paradox: essays in Indian politics. Sage, New Delhi
Yadav Y (2010) Representation. In: Jayal NG, Mehta PB (eds) The Oxford companion to politics in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 347–360
Acknowledgments
Research for this chapter was carried out as part of the R4D project on “Ethnic Power Relations” (see http://www.r4d.ch). The financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Development Agency through Grant No. 400240-147210 is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge the support and expert advice of Lars-Erik Cederman, Simon Hug, and Radu Carciumaru and the comments from participants at the International Political Science Association (IPSA) conference at Brisbane, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Appendix
Appendix
Ethnic profile of the respondents ethnic community/state respondents Jammu and Kashmir
State | Ethnic community | Respondents |
---|---|---|
1. Jammu and Kashmir | Kashmiri Muslim Others | 58 |
Kashmiri Muslims OBC | 2 | |
2. Assam | Christian OBC (Santhali) | 5 |
Christian SC (Sadri) | 1 | |
Christian ST (Garo) | 8 | |
Hindu OBC (Nepali) | 3 | |
Hindu OBC(Rajbongshi) | 3 | |
Hindu Others | 2 | |
Hindu Others(Assamese) | 1 | |
Hindu ST (Bodo-Kacharia) | 31 | |
Hindu ST (Nepali) | 1 | |
Muslim others (Assamese) | 2 | |
Muslim Other (Bengali) | 3 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sekher, M., Awasthi, M., Thomas, A., Kumar, R., Nayak, S. (2019). Negotiating Ethnic Conflict in Deeply Divided Societies: Political Bargaining and Power Sharing as Institutional Strategies. In: Ratuva, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2898-5_152
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2898-5_152
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2897-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2898-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences