Abstract
Pseudomonas spp. are aerobic, Gram-negative bacteria that are ubiquitously found in soils. They are particularly well suited for plant root colonization and many strains display plant growth-promoting and/or biocontrol activity against various plant pathogens. Their ability to metabolize a wide array of nutrients, their rapidity and ease of growth and their natural abundance in variety of plant-soil environments make them promising organisms for the development of commercial biocontrol and biofertilizer products. In this chapter, we will discuss their diversity, genetics and ecology, while putting special emphasis on the mechanisms involved in biocontrol and/or plant growth promotion. Recent progress in genomics and transcriptomics, as well as future research on these organisms will also be discussed.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
3.1 Introduction
The rhizosphere is the narrow zone of soil, influenced by a plant’s root system (Rainey 1999). This zone is rich in nutrients when compared with the bulk soil due to the accumulation of a variety of plant exudates, such as amino acids and sugars, providing a rich source of energy and nutrients for bacteria (Gray and Smith 2005). This situation is reflected by the number of bacteria, commonly referred as rhizobacteria (Schroth and Hancock 1982), that are in the rhizosphere, generally 10–100 times higher than that in the bulk soil (Weller and Thomashow 1994). It has been determined that only 1–2 % of bacteria are able to promote plant growth in the rhizosphere (Antoun and Kloepper 2001) and these bacteria are known as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). The metabolites produced by PGPR can either directly improve plant growth or indirectly improve plant growth by minimizing the effects of soilborne plant pathogens, a concept known as biocontrol. In some cases, biocontrol can also be observed alone without plant growth promotion, while both mechanisms often operate together. Some methods of direct plant promotion include production of the phytohormone auxin (Patten and Glick 2002), decrease of plant ethylene levels (Glick 2012) or increase in iron availability through the effects of siderophores (Cézard et al. 2015). Biocontrol mechanisms can include competition, antibiosis (Podile and Kishore 2006) and induced systemic resistance (ISR; Bakker et al. 2007). Bacteria belonging to diverse genera have been identified as PGPR, of which Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. are predominant (Podile and Kishore 2006).
3.1.1 The Pseudomonadaceae
Pseudomonas spp. belong to the Pseudomonadaceae, which is a large bacterial family. Created in 1917 by Winslow and colleagues, it belongs to the class of Gammaproteobacteria (Winslow et al. 1917). These organisms are free-living bacteria that are commonly found in water and soil environments. Pseudomonadaceae encompasses four bacterial genera: Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Gluconobacter and Zooglea. The Pseudomonas genus was defined earlier than its family by Migula in 1894 (Migula 1894). At that time, distinction between genera was achieved using bacterial morphological properties. Pseudomonas spp. were defined as non-sporulating rod-shape cells which are usually motile. Taxonomy based solely on phenotypical traits was then replaced, due to advances in sequencing technologies, by a classification of Pseudomonas species into five “RNA homology” groups (Palleroni et al. 1973). The rRNA group 1 is the largest and encompasses the so called “fluorescent pseudomonads”, which will be the focus of this book chapter.
3.1.2 Fluorescent Pseudomonads
Fluorescent pseudomonads are a functional group that comprises Pseudomonas species that produce a greenish fluorescent compound, known as pyoverdine, which is a siderophore (Cézard et al. 2015). Pyoverdines are secreted by fluorescent pseudomonads to capture and deliver iron to the cells. Microbial siderophores can also enhance iron uptake by plants that are able to recognize the bacterial ferric-siderophore complex (Masalha et al. 2000; Katiyar and Goel 2004). Over 100 pyoverdines have been identified from different species and strains of Pseudomonas (Meyer et al. 2008), representing about 20 % of the microbial siderophores characterized to date (Boukhalfa and Crumbliss 2002).
At the taxonomical level, the fluorescent pseudomonads include phytopathogenic cytochrome c oxidase positive species (Pseudomonas cichorii, Pseudomonas marginalis and Pseudomonas tolaasii), non-phytopathogenic, non-necrogenic strains (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas chlororaphis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and phytopathogenic necrogenic fluorescent Pseudomonas species without cytochrome c oxidase (Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas viridiflava) (Choudhary et al. 2009). Various phenotypic methods have been used to cluster and identify bacteria according to several features such as morphology, pigmentation, and nutritional requirements. These methods have shown that P. fluorescens and P. putida were heterogeneous which led to P. putida being subdivided into biotypes A and B (biovars A and B). P. fluorescens was also subdivided into seven biotypes. Biotypes A to D and F were named biovars I to V, while biotype D became P. chlororaphis and biotype E became P. chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens (Palleroni 1984).
3.1.3 Genomics and Genome Plasticity
During the last decade, several plant-associated fluorescent pseudomonad genomes have been sequenced including P. putida (Nelson et al. 2002), P. fluorescens (Paulsen et al. 2005) and P. chlororaphis (Shen et al. 2012). Recent breakthroughs in high-throughput sequencing technologies have been accompanied by an overwhelming increase in the number of Pseudomonas spp. genomes publicly available, which has enabled large scale comparative genomic studies. Such studies have highlighted the tremendous genomic diversity of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp. (Loper et al. 2012; Jun et al. 2016).
Plant-associated fluorescent pseudomonads possess a large genome which displays a mosaic structure with genes segregating between the “core genome” and the “accessory genome” (Silby et al. 2011). Genes from the core genome are conserved among the different strains which are thought to be responsible for essential cellular processes, whereas genes from the accessory genome, which are often unique to one or few strains, are responsible for the variability observed among strains. While strains from the fluorescent pseudomonad group share a relatively high number of genes, with 2,789 predicted protein-coding genes present in the genome of ten representative strains, corresponding to between 45 % and 52 % of the total number of genes (Loper et al. 2012), the core genome of the whole Pseudomonas genus was estimated to contain 1,224 protein-coding genes (Jun et al. 2016).
The genomic diversity and plasticity of plant-associated fluorescent pseudomonads come from their accessory genomes. Out of ten strains from the fluorescent pseudomonad group, 13,872 putative coding-protein genes were identified (Loper et al. 2012), of which 5,798 had no orthologs with other Pseudomonas spp. genomes. This diversity is often reflected in the wide range of secondary metabolites produced (Gross and Loper 2009) and it appears that plant-associated saprophytic Pseudomonas spp. genomes are a good place to search for operons involved in the production of new antimicrobial compounds (Gross et al. 2007; Van Der Voort et al. 2015).
Pseudomonas spp. genomes are in perpetual rearrangement as evidenced by the low synteny observed between closely-related strains (Silby et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2011; Loper et al. 2012). Mobile genetic elements, such as genomic islands, transposons or REP-elements are also abundant in the Pseudomonas spp. accessory genomes and often account for horizontal gene transfer acquired genomic material (Silby et al. 2011). The genomic diversity and plasticity of saprophytic plant-associated fluorescent pseudomonads is a key feature that empowers their valuable role in terms of plant growth promotion and biocontrol of plant pathogens.
3.2 Rhizosphere Competence of Plant-Beneficial Fluorescent Pseudomonads
Plant-beneficial fluorescent pseudomonads that possess genetic determinants for plant growth promotion and/or biocontrol of plant pathogens are not always effective when deployed in the field. Despite promising results under controlled condition, many authors have reported on the inconsistency of plant-growth promotion and biocontrol achieved by some Pseudomonas spp. strains in the field and have linked these results to an impaired rhizosphere colonization (Kloepper et al. 1980; Weller 1988). Rhizosphere colonization is a crucial step leading to disease-suppression given that: (i) an inverse correlation between population size of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. and the disease incidence has been observed in several plant-pathogen systems (Bull et al. 1991; Raaijmakers et al. 1995); (ii) impaired rhizosphere colonization mutants, such as those obtained from P. chlororaphis subsp. piscium PCL1391, lost their disease suppression capability toward certain pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices-lycopersici (Chin-A-Woeng et al. 2000); (iii) a linear relationship has been observed between population size of indigenous antibiotics producing Pseudomonas spp. and antibiotics accumulation in the rhizosphere (Raaijmakers et al. 1999; Mavrodi et al. 2012a), which is in line with biocontrol capabilities.
We define the rhizosphere competence (or rhizocompetence) of an introduced plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. strain as its aptitude to establish itself in the rhizosphere of a plant and to persist during several crop cycles while maintaining a high population level. It appeals to the capacity of an organism to forge a successful trophic relationship with the plant as well to its ability to compete with indigenous microorganisms coveting the very same ecological niches. Various approaches have been undertaken to identify traits involved in the rhizosphere competence of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. including site-directed mutagenesis (Lugtenberg et al. 2001), rhizosphere-induced gene monitoring with promoter-trapping technology (IVET; Rainey 1999) and broader population-based approaches by assessing traits which distinguish fluorescent pseudomonads from the rhizosphere to those isolated from the bulk soil (Latour et al. 2003). Many traits indispensable for rhizosphere colonization have been characterized, such as flagella, chemotaxis, adhesion, etc. (Lugtenberg et al. 2001) often by monitoring the speed at which bacteria reach the root tip of seedlings grown under gnotobiotic conditions with total disregard for the key role of competition in rhizosphere colonization. Nonetheless, comparative studies carried out in agricultural soils have highlighted the superior root-colonizing ability of certain genotypes over others (Raaijmakers and Weller 2001; Ghirardi et al. 2012), and have successfully identified major competitive enhancing traits for rhizosphere colonization (Ghirardi et al. 2012).
3.2.1 Interactions Between Plant-Beneficial Pseudomonas spp. and Their Host
3.2.1.1 Rhizoplane Colonization by Plant-Beneficial Pseudomonas spp.
Some root exudates, such as malic acid and citric acid, act as chemoattractants for beneficial (and deleterious) bacteria. Hence, motility (De Weger et al. 1987) and especially flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components (De Weert et al. 2002), is an important trait for the rhizosphere competence of Pseudomonas spp. In fact, the rhizosphere is not considered as a homogeneous environment but rather as a succession of favourable and less favourable ecological niches; chemotaxis allows Pseudomonas spp. to set a course to the most advantageous locations which are generally located at the junctions between epidermal root cells and sites of side roots appearance (Chin-A-Woeng et al. 1997). Adhesion to the root surface is an important mechanism in root colonization, and several determinants have been described. The hair-like structures pili and a root-adhesion outer membrane protein, homologous to OprF from the plant pathogen P. syringae, have been shown to be involved in the adhesion to the root surface of several plants by Pseudomonas spp. (Vesper 1987; De Mot et al. 1992). The plant root surface glycoprotein agglutinin has been implicated in the adhesion of P. putida to the root, an adhesion mediated by the coding-protein gene aggA (Anderson 1983; Buell and Anderson 1992). Transition from transient adhesion to irreversible attachment to root surfaces constitutes the first step to the formation of a microcolony (or biofilm), which will soon become a mature biofilm. Lap (large adhesion proteins) has been shown to be involved in this transition in P. putida (Hinsa et al. 2003). Biofilms are multicellular aggregates encased in a complex matrix mainly composed of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), proteins and eDNA (extracellular DNA; Flemming and Wingender 2010). Biofilms enable plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. to resist harsh conditions including desiccation and high concentrations of toxic compounds (Danhorn and Fuqua 2007).
3.2.1.2 Antibiotic Production
Large populations of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. have been observed in several fields (Raaijmakers et al. 1997; Mazurier et al. 2009; Parejko et al. 2012) and have been frequently associated with disease-suppressiveness (Raaijmakers and Weller 1998; Weller et al. 2002; Mazurier et al. 2009). One may think that the capacity to produce broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG) or phenazine derivatives might enhance the ecological competence throughout antagonism towards competitors. However, it remains to be demonstrated. Carroll et al. (1995) showed that the incapacity to produce DAPG did not reduce the rhizosphere competence of strain P. fluorescens F113 in the rhizosphere of sugarbeets. In contrast, phenazine defective mutants of strains P. synxantha 2–79 and P. chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens 30–84 were not able to maintain high population levels in the rhizosphere of wheat in the presence of indigenous microorganisms, whereas a P. chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens 30–84 phenazine defective mutant colonized to the same extent as its parent strain when inoculated in the rhizosphere of wheat grown in pasteurized soil (Mazzola et al. 1992). These results suggest the involvement of phenazine production in competitive rhizosphere colonization by plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp., but do not demonstrate that antibiosis is the mechanism involved. It has been suggested that phenazines do not affect the immediate competitors of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. (Mavrodi et al. 2006; Pierson and Pierson 2010) and could serve other purposes (Price-Whelan et al. 2006).
3.3 Fluorescent Pseudomonad Mechanisms Leading to Plant Growth Promotion
With regards to plant growth promotion, fluorescent pseudomonads are often divided in two groups, based on their mode of action. The first group, which will be covered in this section, consists of fluorescent pseudomonads that directly influence plant growth, seed emergence or improve crop yields and are often referred as biofertilizers (Glick et al. 1999). The second group is known as biocontrol fluorescent pseudomonads that are able to indirectly influence plant growth by reducing the negative pressure that plant pathogens put on the plant’s growth and development.
3.3.1 Direct Plant Growth Promotion
Various mechanisms of direct plant growth promotion have been studied, such as the production of phytohormones, including auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins, the reduction of ethylene levels in plants through the action of ACC-deaminase enzyme and mechanisms to increase nutrient availability in the plant, such as increasing phosphorus uptake by solubilisation of inorganic phosphates, the production of iron-chelating siderophores to increase iron uptake and nitrogen fixation. Only few species of Pseudomonas have shown the ability to fix nitrogen, including Pseudomonas stutzeri (Krotzky and Werner 1987) and Pseudomonas azotifigens (Hatayama et al. 2005). As these species are not part of the fluorescent pseudomonad group, nitrogen fixation will not be further discussed.
Plant growth hormones (e.g. auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins) are synthesized in extremely low concentrations in plants and act as chemical messengers and growth and development regulators in plants (Martínez-Viveros et al. 2010). In addition to being synthesized by plants, these phytohormones are synthesized by a number of bacteria associated with plants and soil (Martinez-Toledo et al. 1988; Bottini et al. 1989). The production of phytohormones by Pseudomonas species is considered to be one of their main mechanisms of plant growth promotion (Egamberdieva 2005). To date, auxins are the most well studied phytohormones in rhizobacteria (Karadeniz et al. 2006; Spaepen et al. 2007). Bacterial production of phytohormones is interesting as there is currently no evidence for metabolic effects of phytohormones in bacteria (Persello-Cartiaux et al. 2003).
3.3.1.1 Indole-3-Acetic Acid
Auxin is a phytohormone produced by plants and involved in growth regulation. It was discovered that a majority of bacteria in the rhizosphere are able to produce the auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and auxins are able to influence plant growth in beneficial and deleterious ways (Patten and Glick 1996). Several pathways for IAA synthesis from L-tryptophan have been investigated, such as the indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway (Costacurta et al. 1994; Patten and Glick 1996), the indole-3-acetamide pathway (Patten and Glick 1996) and the side chain oxidase pathway (Oberhänsli et al. 1991; Patten and Glick 1996).
Many factors can influence the production of IAA levels including the IAA production pathway (Persello-Cartiaux et al. 2003) and the localization of the IAA synthesis genes, either in the bacterial chromosome or on a plasmid (Patten and Glick 1996). The impact of bacterial IAA on plants has been either beneficial or deleterious and its effect seems to depend on the level of IAA produced inherently by the plant (Dubeikovsky et al. 1993; Persello-Cartiaux et al. 2003). In cases where plants produce low levels of IAA, the addition of bacterial IAA can be beneficial on the plant roots. Beneficial effects of bacterial IAA have been shown to stimulate root hair formation and increase the number and length of lateral and primary roots (Davies 1995). When the plant is producing adequate levels of IAA, the addition of bacterial IAA can be detrimental on root length. At deleterious levels, IAA has been shown to be inhibitory to primary root growth (Davies 1995). Cucumber plants inoculated with a wild type IAA producing P. protegens CHA0 strain demonstrated enhanced growth, while inoculation with an IAA overproducing mutant stunted the cucumber growth (Beyeler et al. 1999). The IAA overproducing strain P. fluorescens BSP53a stimulated root development in black currant, but suppressed root development in sour cherry cuttings (Dubeikovsky et al. 1993). The authors suggest that their results indicate that the amount of IAA produced by black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) plants was suboptimal while the amount secreted by sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) cuttings was already optimal for the plant and the additional level of IAA produced by P. fluorescens BSP53a was inhibitory. The range of optimal IAA concentration for plants may be small as P. putida GR12-2, a low level producer of IAA, resulted in a two to three fold increase in the length of canola (Brassica napus L.) seedling roots (Glick 1995; Caron et al. 1996) while an over-producing mutant of P. putida GR12-2 (producing four times the amount of the wild type) significantly inhibited the growth of canola roots (Xie et al. 1996).
3.3.1.2 Cytokinins
Cytokinins are N6-substituted aminopurines that are synthesized in plant roots and are translocated to the shoots through the xylem. They are involved in multiple functions and act as plant growth regulators and influence plant physiological and developmental processes such as cell division, seed germination, root development, accumulation of chlorophyll, leaf expansion, and delay of leaf and chloroplast senescence (Patrick 1987; Salisbury and Ross 1992; Arshad and Frankerberger 1993; Chernyad’ev 2009). Several natural cytokinins are known and include isopentenyladenine and compounds differing in the presence or absence and location of a hydroxyl group: zeatin, trans-zeatin, cis-zeatin and dihydrozeatin (Chernyad’ev 2009). At very low concentrations (as low as 10−8 M) cytokinin use in plant growth promotion can be efficient, environmentally safe and inexpensive (Chernyad’ev 2009). They have been shown to act in conjunction with auxins. In in vitro plant cell cultures, a high cytokinin/auxin ratio promoted shoot production while auxin alone initiated root growth and equimolar amounts of cytokinin and auxin caused undifferentiated callus cells to proliferate (Crozier et al. 2000).
Cytokinins may also be produced by rhizosphere microorganisms that live in close proximity to the root and these cytokinins also may influence plant growth and development (Nieto and Frankenberger 1990; Arshad and Frankerberger 1993; De Salamone et al. 2001). Inoculation of plants with bacteria producing cytokinins has been shown to stimulate shoot growth and reduce root/shoot ratio in plants suffering due to drought (Arkipova et al. 2007).
3.3.1.3 Gibberellins
Gibberellins (GAs) are a large group of important tetracyclic diterpenoid acids and are produced by plants and influence a range of developmental processes in plants including stem elongation, seed germination, seedling emergence, and flower and fruit growth (Davies 1995; Crozier et al. 2000; King and Evans 2003; Sponsel 2003). In most of these processes, gibberellins act in combination with other phytohormones and other regulatory factors, demonstrating highly integrated signaling pathways (Trewavas 2000).
Many GAs have been identified using modern analytical techniques and 136 GAs have been identified in plants, fungi and bacteria (Arshad and Frankerberger 1993; Bottini et al. 2004). Three β-hydroxylated, C19 gibberellins GA1, GA3 and GA4, have all been reported as being directly involved in promotion of shoot elongation in plants (Crozier et al. 2000). Gibberellic acid (GA3) is the main product of gibberellins in bacteria (Bruckner and Blecschmidt 1991). It is a terpenoid hormone involved in regulating plant growth and development (Karakoç and Aksöz 2006). Gibberellin production has been observed in various Pseudomonas spp. P. putida H-2-3 that produces bioactive GA1 and GA4 significantly increased the growth of a GA-deficient rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Waito-C (Kang et al. 2014). This strain was also able to enhance plant growth as well as tolerance to drought and salt stresses in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) plants through various mechanisms, including GA production (Kang et al. 2014). Inoculation of GA-producing Pseudomonas sp. 54RB led to increased growth and yield in soybean plants (Afzal et al. 2010). GA3 production is influenced by cultural conditions and these factors include pH, temperature and incubation time (Kahlon and Malhotra 1986).
3.3.1.4 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate (ACC) Deaminase
Ethylene is a gaseous phytohormone that acts at low concentrations in the regulation of all processes of plant growth, development and senescence (Shaharoona et al. 2006; Saleem et al. 2007). In addition to acting as a plant growth regulator, it has also been identified as a stress hormone. At high concentrations, ethylene can be harmful as it induces defoliation, premature senescence and cellular processes that inhibit stem and root growth (Li et al. 2005). In response to various environmental stressors, plants will synthesize 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) which is the immediate precursor for ethylene (Chen et al. 2002; Glick et al. 2007). Some of the ACC produced by the plants is secreted into the rhizosphere and reabsorbed by the plant roots, where it will be converted to ethylene. Accumulation of ethylene in the roots leads to poor root growth and further stress. The ability to degrade ACC by bacteria in the rhizosphere helps in the re-establishment of a healthy root system that can surmount environmental stresses (Martinez-Viveros et al. 2010).
Many bacteria synthesize the enzyme ACC deaminase that will degrade ethylene to α-ketobutyrate and ammonia (Glick et al. 1998; Glick 2005). A significant amount of ACC might be excreted by the plants roots and taken up by soil microorganisms and hydrolyzed by ACC deaminase, decreasing the amount of ACC in the environment, preventing ethylene accumulation in plants and allows the bacteria to use ACC as a nitrogen source (Penrose and Glick 2003; Persello-Cartiaux et al. 2003; Glick 2005).
Pseudomonas strains demonstrating ACC deaminase activity have been isolated in soil (Govindasamy et al. 2008). Reed and Glick (2005) inoculated canola seeds with ACC-deaminase producing Pseudomonas asplenii and observed an increase in dry matter content of the root and aerial parts. Arshad et al. (2008) demonstrated that a strain of Pseudomonas sp. with ACC deaminase activity was able to partially eliminate the effect of drought stress on the growth of peas. Tomato plants pretreated with P. fluorescens and P. migulae (both displaying ACC deaminase activity) were healthier and demonstrated better growth under high salinity stress compared to plants pretreated with an ACC deaminase deficient mutant or without bacterial treatment (Ali et al. 2014). P. fluorescens strains transformed with ACC deaminase gene and its regulatory region increased length of canola plants (Wang et al. 2000).
3.3.1.5 Phosphate Solubilizing Pseudomonas spp.
Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant nutrient for growth and development with low availability in many agricultural soils (Martínez-Viveros et al. 2010). Many soils have a high total P content due to the application of P fertilizers over long periods of time (Dey 1988), however, a large portion of P is present in insoluble forms and is not available for plant nutrition (Mullen 2005).
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria constitute between 1 % and 50 % of the total population of cultivable bacteria in soil (Chabot et al. 1993; Khan et al. 2009). A considerably higher concentration of phosphate solubilizing bacteria is found in the rhizosphere as compared to bulk soil (Katznelson et al. 1962; Raghu and MacRae 1966). The ability of rhizosphere bacteria to solubilize insoluble P minerals has been attributed to their secretion of organic acids (e.g. gluconate, citrate, lactate, and succinate) and phosphatases (Gyaneshwar et al. 1999; Rodríguez and Fraga 1999) to convert the insoluble phosphate into soluble ions (Podile and Kishore 2006). These bacteria solubilize quantities in excess of their nutritional demands, thereby making it available for plants (Chen et al. 2006).
Increased plant growth and phosphate uptake have been reported in many crop species as a result of the inoculation of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas species, for example in rice (Gusain et al. 2015), in soybean (Fankem et al. 2015; Afzal et al. 2010), in pea (Oteino et al. 2015) and in wheat (Babana and Antoun 2006). Additionally, Afzal et al. (2010) found increased nodulation in soybean plants that were co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium strain TAL 377 and Pseudomonas sp. strain 54RB as compared to only Bradyrhizobium TAL 377. They suggest that the increase in nodulation could be due to Pseudomonas-induced phosphate solubilisation (as well as an increase in gibberellic acid), which increased root proliferation and stimulated plant growth (Afzal et al. 2010).
3.3.1.6 Siderophores
Hundreds of siderophores have been identified and reported for cultivable microorganisms, some of which are recognized and used by different microorganisms, while other are species-specific (Crowley 2006). These compounds are produced by various types of bacteria in response to iron deficiency, normally occurring in neutral to alkaline pH soils, due to low iron solubility at high pH (Sharma and Johri 2003). Many plants can use various bacterial siderophores as iron sources, although the total concentrations may be too low to significantly contribute to plant iron uptake.
Among most of the bacterial siderophores studied, those produced by Pseudomonas species are known for their high affinity to iron. The most abundant siderophore in Pseudomonas sp. is pyoverdine. Carrillo-Castañeda et al. (2002) reported positive effects on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plantlet growth after the inoculation of siderophore producing Pseudomonas sp. grown in iron limited cultures. The inoculated alfalfa seeds increased their germination as well as the root and stem dry weight.
3.3.1.7 Pyrroloquinoline Quinone
Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) is the main cofactor in redox enzymes names quinoproteins and was first identified in 1979 as a cofactor in bacterial methanol dehydrogenase (Salisbury et al. 1979) and glucose dehydrogenase (Duine et al. 1979). The production of the PQQ molecule is encoded by the pqq operon which consists of six core genes, pqqABCDEF (Goldstein et al. 2003; Oteino et al. 2015). Additional genes in the PQQ operon (pqqHIJKM) have been identified in P. fluorescens B16 (Choi et al. 2008). PQQ has antioxidant properties and is involved in plant growth promotion through phosphate solubilisation. Glucose dehydrogenase uses PQQ as a redox cofactor for the oxidation of glucose to gluconic acid. This acid is then diffused into the areas surrounding the bacteria and helps in the acidic solubilisation of insoluble phosphates in soil (Duine et al. 1990; Stites et al. 2000; Misra et al. 2012). Other studies have shown that PQQ is also involved in the biocontrol ability in certain P. fluorescens strains (James and Gutterson 1986; de Werra et al. 2009).
In addition to its role in phosphate solubilisation, PQQ is suspected to be directly involved in plant growth promotion. A PQQ mutant of P. fluorescens B16 lost its growth promoting ability in tomato, cucumber, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.), and hot pepper (Capsicum annuum (L.)), which were restored when the PQQ genes were complemented in the B16 mutant (Choi et al. 2008). This group also directly applied synthetic PQQ to cucumber plants and saw an increase in the fresh weight of the plants (Choi et al. 2008). They also applied synthetic PQQ to germinating seedlings of Arabidopsis and hot pepper and observed increases in the fresh and dry weight of Arabidopsis and the size of the cotyledons of the hot peppers, indicating that PQQ is directly involved in plant growth promotion (Choi et al. 2008).
3.3.2 Plant-Beneficial Fluorescent Pseudomonads in Biocontrol
The fluorescent pseudomonads group contains numerous organisms that have the capacity to suppress diseases in several plant-pathogen systems and that can act as effective biological control agents (BCAs; Haas and Défago 2005). In this section, we will attempt to summarize the knowledge gathered on biocontrol of plant pathogens using fluorescent pseudomonads.
3.3.2.1 Plant-Pathogens and Systems Controlled by Fluorescent Pseudomonads
Since the publication of an important review by Weller in 2007, a large number of studies have focused on plant beneficial fluorescent pseudomonads and their antagonistic activity toward plant pathogens. The biocontrol capability of fluorescent pseudomonads is particularly interesting as they exhibit a wide activity and are able to target a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Among these, the fungus G aeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, responsible for the take-all disease of wheat, is the most studied and described plant pathogen system and serves as a model system for Pseudomonas spp./pathogen interactions (Kwak and Weller 2013). In this system, P. protegens CHA0 has been shown to control the disease through characterized antifungal activity determinants, such as the production of DAPG (Keel et al. 1992). When comparing the biocontrol activity of P. protegens CHA0 and a mutant unable to produce DAPG, Keel et al. (1992) found that the DAPG-mutant showed less inhibition of G. graminis var. tritici in vitro, and less suppression effect on take-all of wheat as compared to the wild-type. However, although various roles of DAPG are known, such as an inducer of plant resistance and a signal molecule that affects gene expression (Dubuis et al. 2007), the precise mode of action of DAPG in disease suppression is still a matter of debate.
An increasing number of papers have been published about new fluorescent pseudomonads demonstrating biocontrol activity, so we present a table listing studies that have occurred since Weller’s review published in 2007 (Table 3.1). Most of these studies have focused on fungal diseases, whereas studies describing the biocontrol of bacterial and viral diseases using fluorescent pseudomonads are rare. In this context, in the last 10 years, Rhizoctonia solani has been the most investigated pathogen, while the majority of biocontrol stains described belong to the species P. fluorescens.
With the recent developments and costs reductions associated with next-generation genome sequencing, genome sequencing of fluorescent pseudomonads of biocontrol interest has been significantly increasing. Next-generation sequencing not only allows the comparison of different biocontrol strains and exploring their functional heterogeneity against their origins (Loper et al. 2012; Rong et al. 2012) but it is also increasingly used to identify genes of biocontrol interest, such as those involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis (Massart et al. 2015; Roquigny et al. 2015).
3.3.2.2 Mechanisms Involved in Disease Suppression
Over the years, it has been demonstrated that fluorescent pseudomonads display numerous capabilities to suppress plant diseases due to various genetic and phenotypic characteristics. To date, several mechanisms of disease suppression have been detected in Pseudomonas spp. and the main ones are competition for iron (Berg 2009), plant induced systemic resistance (ISR; Bakker et al. 2007) and antibiosis (Raaijmakers et al. 2002). Once fluorescent pseudomonads are established in the plant rhizosphere, more than one mechanisms of biocontrol may be used in parallel.
3.3.2.2.1 Competition
Previously described as one of the primary ways for bacteria to establish themselves in the rhizosphere, competition is also one of the main mechanisms used by BCAs to compete with plant pathogens for space and nutrients, leading to reduced disease development (Haas and Défago 2005). One of the main nutrients that leads to competition is iron due to its limiting presence in soil (Loper and Buyer 1991). Fluorescent pseudomonads will compete for iron through the production of the siderophore pyoverdine. Siderophores have demonstrated biocontrol capacity under in vitro and in vivo conditions on pathogenic fungi or fungal-like organisms, including Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp. (Loper and Buyer 1991; León et al. 2009; Sen et al. 2009). Since the 1990s, it was suggested that siderophores production was dependent on a large range of biotic and abiotic factors (Loper and Buyer 1991; O’Sullivan and O’Gara 1992); notably, the nature and the concentration of nitrogen and carbon sources, the level of phosphate, and the soil’s pH and temperature (O’Sullivan and O’Gara 1992). For example, in the case of P. aeruginosa PAO1, a high phosphate concentration inhibits pyoverdine production. Succinic acid and ammonium sulphate have been identified to be the best sources of carbon and nitrogen for pyoverdine production with an optimum carbon to nitrogen ratio of 4 to 1 (Barbhaiya and Rao 1985). Loper and Buyer (1991) concluded that among these factors, pH might be the most important for iron availability in soil. More recently, similar studies were performed and demonstrated the importance of minerals and carbon sources for siderophore biosynthesis and therefore for microbial competition (Duffy and Défago 1999; Guiñazú et al. 2010, 2013).
3.3.2.2.2 Induced Resistance
Some physical or chemical stresses have been shown to be responsible for an induced state of resistance in plants which protects against pathogenic infections (Pieterse et al. 2014). Resistance can be triggered either by pathogenic or non-pathogenic microorganisms, therefore two main types of resistance have been identified: systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which is usually triggered by pathogenic microorganisms infecting the plant but to a level that does not cause disease development, and induced systemic resistance (ISR) generally triggered by beneficial microorganisms. This distinction between the agents responsible for inducing either SAR or ISR is not always clear and it has been shown that a beneficial microorganism may induce SAR response (Van De Mortel et al. 2012), and a pathogenic microorganism an ISR response (Pieterse et al. 2014). Finally, in some cases, both SAR and ISR have been shown to be induced in parallel (Van Wees et al. 2000). The focus of this section will be on the typical ISR response generally induced by plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp.
Before considering ISR, it is however important to briefly described SAR, which has been fully reviewed throughout the years (Spoel and Dong 2012; Dangl et al. 2013; Henry et al. 2013; Pieterse et al. 2013, 2014). SAR in plants is triggered after a local activation of immunity through physical or chemical recognition of a pathogen by the plant. Then, a complex network of signals is activated which may lead to a systemic defense response in the plant. Two major types of signals: PTI ((PAMP (pathogen-associated-molecular-pattern)-triggered immunity)) and ETI (effector-triggered immunity) (Thonart et al. 2012), may be involved. Briefly, PTI is considered as the first line of defense of the plant, which is often bypassed by the plant pathogen through suppression of PTI or preventing the pathogen’s detection. ETI is instead considered as a manifestation of the second line of defense, often described as a gene-for-gene resistance leading most of the time to a programmed cell death in order to stop the infection. In other words, PTI and ETI are the local defense lines of the plant, which in turn may trigger SAR if the pathogen is capable of escaping these first and second lines of defense. SAR is mediated by the plant hormone salicylic acid (SA). An increase in the SA level throughout the plant is essential for the establishment of SAR (Van Loon and Bakker 2006). According to current knowledge, SAR seems to remain active for the lifetime of the plant in spite of a lessened induced state that can be observed over time (Van Loon and Bakker 2006).
On the other hand, ISR is a typical mode of action of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. in disease suppression. During ISR, bacterial determinants like flagella and secondary metabolites such as DAPG, lipopolysaccharides, and siderophores are detected by the plant host, leading to the secretion of hormonal mediators (Bakker et al. 2013). ISR is mediated by jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET). Many good reviews have been published on the subject (Bakker et al. 2007, 2013; Pieterse et al. 2014). According to the review by Bakker et al. (2007), noteworthy determinants of Pseudomonas spp. are the production of siderophores such as pseudobactin (pyoverdine) and antibiotics such as DAPG. More recently, the capacity of P. chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca Pa40 in eliciting an ISR response in wheat infected by Rhizoctonia cerealis was linked to the production of phenazines rather than other bacterial determinants (Jiao et al. 2013).
Following the accumulation of JA, ET (in ISR) and/or SA (in SAR) different metabolic cascades connected with the different pathways (ISR or SAR) result in systemic chemical changes in the plant such as the release of proteins or defense strengthening physical barriers of the plant (Jones and Dangl 2006; Dangl et al. 2013). For instance, a hypersensitive response, which is associated with a programmed cell death, can be observed as the hallmark of ETI (Spoel and Dong 2012). After the activation of plant-defense pathways, the plant cell wall is reinforced by the deposition of glucan polymers (Spoel and Dong 2012). Current trends are to study a plant’s transcriptome to better understand ISR-SAR activation differences. One of the first studies was on Arabidopsis thaliana whose resistance was induced by beneficial P. fluorescens WCS417r (Verhagen et al. 2004). This study revealed that in A. thaliana, gene activity of the transcription factors implicated in the regulation of JA and ET-dependent defenses was upregulated in the root, but not in the leaves (Verhagen et al. 2004). Walters et al. (2013) reviewed controlling crop diseases using induced resistance and discussed notably that as induced resistance is a host response, its expression under field conditions is likely to be influenced by a number of factors, including the environment, genotype, crop nutrition and the extent to which plants are already induced.
3.3.2.2.3 Antibiosis
Antibiosis is described as the capacity to produce and secrete antibiotic compounds or other antimicrobial diffusible compounds leading to the inhibition of a pathogen’s growth and, in most cases, to the reduction of the pathogen’s population. Several secondary metabolites produced by fluorescent pseudomonads have been studied and their activity has been demonstrated by comparing the activity of wild-type strains to isogenic non-antibiotic producing mutant strains. These types of studies have shown that antibiosis is one of the most important mechanisms for biocontrol in fluorescent pseudomonads (Siddiqui 2005). Plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp. are able to produce and secrete a wide range of antimicrobial compounds. The best example of this is P. protegens CHA0, which can synthetize more than ten compounds displaying antagonistic activity towards pathogens: DAPG, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), pyoluteorin (PLT), pyrrolnitrin (PRN), and multiple phenazine compounds (Haas et al. 1991; Haas and Défago 2005). For a description of the nature, the biosynthesis, and the function of antibiotic compounds produced by fluorescent pseudomonads, readers are referred to several excellent reviews on this topic (Keel et al. 1992; Raaijmakers et al. 2002; Haas and Défago 2005; Fernando et al. 2006; Mavrodi et al. 2006, 2010). As one of the most studied group of antibiotics involved in plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp./pathogen interactions, we will describe in more detail the phenazine derivatives group, their production and their action in the field.
3.3.2.2.4 Phenazines
Phenazines play a vital role in the biocontrol of plant diseases (Tambong and Höfte 2001; Chin-A-Woeng et al. 2003; Mavrodi et al. 2006; D’aes et al. 2011; Hua and Höfte 2015) and may also contribute to biofilm formation and virulence (Price-Whelan et al. 2006; Pierson and Pierson 2010; Selin et al. 2010). The most common phenazine derivatives are pyocyanin, phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) and phenazine-1-carboxamide (PCN). These compounds appear to improve the stability of colonies by producing a biofilm that allows the bacteria to attach to roots or seeds of plants (Mavrodi et al. 2006). The genes responsible for the production of PCA are organized in an operon of seven genes: phzABCDEFG (Mavrodi et al. 2006, 2010). This operon is accompanied by genes involved in the regulation, transport, resistance and PCA conversion to other phenazine derivatives. The phenazine operon is well conserved as the loss of the ability to produce phenazines is usually associated with a reduced ability to survive in the environment (Mavrodi et al. 2013).
As previously indicated, fluorescent pseudomonads can produce a large range of antimicrobial secondary metabolites, however, the capacity to produce a greater number of antibiotics is not necessarily associated with a better biocontrol response (Perneel et al. 2007). The production of HCN, PCA, PCN, PLT and PRN by Pseudomonas sp. CMR5c would suggest that this strain could be a perfect biocontrol agent with a broad spectrum activity. However, despite the myriad of secondary metabolites being produced, Pseudomonas sp. CMR5c was not as effective as Pseudomonas sp. CMR12a, which produces phenazine derivatives, against Pythium myriotylum in cocoyam (Perneel et al. 2007). The authors concluded that in this system, phenazines are key factors in the biological control of cocoyam root rot rather than pyrrolnitrin and pyoluteorin.
Another important point to consider concerning phenazines implication in biocontrol is the quantity or the dose being produced by a given BCA. Pathogen destruction is linked to high levels of antibiotics (Haas and Keel 2003) and a decrease in the pathogen population may depend on the concentration of PCA produced by a BCA (Arseneault et al. 2014). This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the level and the timing of antibiotic biosynthetic gene expression depends on the bacterial population density. The higher a bacterial concentration is, the more antibiotic accumulation will occur in soil (Mavrodi et al. 2012a). In general, the scientific community agrees on the necessity to have a minimal threshold of BCA present in order for biocontrol to occur. For phenazine-producing plant-beneficial Pseudomonas spp., this level has been estimated between 104 and 106 CFU/g of root (Raaijmakers and Weller 1998; Haas and Défago 2005). The ability to quantify antibiotics directly in soils is increasingly interesting to scientists. For example, it was observed that for PCA, 100 μM localized produced amounts were sufficient for the inhibition of pathogens (Mendes et al. 2011). It has, however, been suggested that a sub-inhibitory concentration of antibiotics might, in some cases, suppress disease development through the alteration of the transcriptional activity of key pathogenesis genes in the pathogen (Davies et al. 2006; Raaijmakers and Mazzola 2012). Arseneault et al. (2013) have suggested that transcriptional changes in a pathogen leading to reduced virulence due to the exposure to sub-inhibitory concentration of antibiotics is a key factor in biocontrol and could be considered as an independent mechanism of antibiosis (Arseneault et al. 2013). More specifically, the reduction of potato common scab disease symptoms was not linked to a reduction in Streptomyces scabies following the inoculation of potato plants with PCA-producing P. fluorescens LBUM 223, but to a significant alteration of gene expression, notably genes involved in pathogenicity, suggesting a novel biocontrol mechanism (Arseneault et al. 2017, unpublished results).
3.3.3 Regulation of Biocontrol Mechanisms
As previously mentioned, the production of secondary metabolites is usually dependent on bacterial population density, a phenomenon known as quorum sensing (QS). Once the quorum is reached, bacteria are able to modify the expression of some operons involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis by “sensing” the accumulation of small signaling molecules called autoinducers. For Pseudomonas spp., N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones (AHL) have been identified as key signal molecules and their synthesis and recognition generally involves the LuxI/LuxR-like protein family system (Lee et al. 2010). QS is involved in many cellular processes such as antibiotic synthesis and biofilm formation. In P. aeruginosa, this is the main mechanism for regulating the production of PCA (Pierson and Pierson 1996; Chin-A-Woeng et al. 2003). More recently, in P. chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca StFRB508, multiple AHLs produced via two different quorum-sensing systems demonstrated the regulation of a same QS-regulated-function; PCA production (Morohoshi et al. 2013). Biosynthesis of phenazines seems to occur late during the growth phase of Pseudomonas spp. (Mavrodi et al. 2006) as it depends on the population density and certain environmental conditions such as temperature, pH, and the availability of certain nutrients (Chin-A-Woeng et al. 2003). Throughout the years, a lot of excellent review articles that have focused on quorum sensing have been published and we refer the reader to these for more details on the subject (Miller and Bassler 2001; Schauder and Bassler 2001; Compant et al. 2005; Williams 2007; Ng and Bassler 2009).
3.4 Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Fluorescent pseudomonads are proven to be an important group of plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents. They are able to utilize various mechanisms to increase plant growth, protect plants from disease, and to colonize and maintain significant populations in the rhizosphere of many different plants. However, many questions remain as to how to utilize our knowledge of root colonization, plant growth promotion and biocontrol activities of Pseudomonas species to use these strains in large-scale agricultural contexts. The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies will allow future research to investigate the accessory genomes of many Pseudomonas species to better understand their unique plant growth promotion and biocontrol activities. Next-generation sequencing will also allow researchers to focus on the rhizosphere as a whole and better understand the interactions of Pseudomonas species with the indigenous rhizosphere population and the plant through transcriptome and metagenome analyses. Better understanding of these complex interactions may gain insight to overcome inconsistent disease control, which remains a major impediment to widespread use and commercialization of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas species.
References
Adesina MF, Grosch R, Lembke A et al (2009) In vitro antagonists of Rhizoctonia solani tested on lettuce: rhizosphere competence, biocontrol efficiency and rhizosphere microbial community response. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69:62–74
Afsharmanesh H, Ahmadzadeh M, Javan-Nikkhah M et al (2010) Characterization of the antagonistic activity of a new indigenous strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from onion rhizosphere. J Plant Pathol 92:187–194
Afzal A, Bano A, Fatima M (2010) Higher soybean yield by inoculating with N-fixing and P-solubilizing bacteria. Agron Sustain Dev 30:487–495
Aksoy H-M, Kutluk Yilmaz N-D (2008) Antagonistic effects of natural Pseudomonas putida biotypes on Polymyxa betae Keskin, the vector of beet necrotic yellow vein virus in sugar beet. J Plant Dis Prot 115:241–246
Ali S, Trevor CC, Glick BR (2014) Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiol Biochem 80:160–167
Anderson AJ (1983) Isolation from root and shoot surfaces of agglutinins that show specificity for saprophytic pseudomonads. Can J Bot 61:3438–3443
Antoun H, Kloepper JW (2001) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Brenner S, Miller JH (eds) Encyclopedia of genetics. Academic, New York, pp 1477–1480
Arkipova TN, Prinsen EA, Veselov SU et al (2007) Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil. Plant Soil 292:305–315
Arseneault T, Goyer C, Filion M (2017) Phenazine production by Pseudomonas sp. LBUM223 contributes to the biological control of potato common scab. Phytopathology 103:995–1000
Arseneault T, Pieterse CMJ, Gerin-Ouellet M et al (2014) Long-term induction of defense gene expression in potato by Pseudomonas sp. LBUM223 and Streptomyces scabies. Phytopathology 104:926–932
Arshad M, Frankerberger WT Jr (1993) Microbial production of plant growth regulators. In: Metting FB Jr, Dekker M (eds) Soil microbial ecology. Applications in agricultural and environmental management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 307–348
Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmood T (2008) Inoculation with Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield, and ripening of pea (Pisum sativum L.) Pedosphere 18:611–620
Babana A, Antoun H (2006) Effect of Tilemsi phosphate rock-solubilizing microorganisms on phosphorus uptake and yield of field-grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Mali. Plant Soil 287:51–58
Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC (2007) Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97:239–243
Bakker PAHM, Doornbos RF, Zamioudis C et al (2013) Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Pathol J 29:136–143
Barbhaiya H, Rao K (1985) Production of pyoverdine, the fluorescent pigment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 27:233–235
Berg G (2009) Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18
Beyeler M, Keel C, Michaux P et al (1999) Enhanced production of indole-3-acetic acid by a genetically modified strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 affects root growth of cucumber, but does not improve protection of the plant against Pythium root rot. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28:225–233
Bottini R, Fulchieri M, Pearce Pharis DRP (1989) Identification of gibberellins A1, A3 and Iso-A3 in cultures of Azosporillum lipoferum. Plant Physiol 10:45–47
Bottini R, Cassán F, Piccoli P (2004) Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:497–503
Boukhalfa H, Crumbliss AL (2002) Chemical aspects of siderophore mediated iron transport. Biometals 15:325–339
Bradley GG, Punja ZK (2010) Composts containing fluorescent pseudomonads suppress Fusarium root and stem rot development on greenhouse cucumber. Can J Microbiol 56:896–905
Bruckner B, Blecschmidt D (1991) The gibberellin fermentation. Crit Rev Biotechnol 11:163–192
Buell C, Anderson A (1992) Genetic analysis of the aggA locus involved in agglutination and adherence of Pseudomonas putida, a beneficial fluorescent pseudomonad. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 5:154–162
Bull CT, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1991) Relationship between root colonization and suppression of Gaeumannomyces-graminis var tritici by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 2–79. Phytopathology 81:954–959
Caron M, Patten CL, Ghosh S et al (1996) Effects of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR 122 on the physiology of canola roots. Plant Growth Regul Soc Am Q 7:18–20
Carrillo-Castañeda G, Juárez Muños J, Peralta-Videa JR et al (2002) Alfalfa growth promotion by bacteria grown under iron limiting conditions. Adv Environ Res 6:391–399
Carroll H, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Dowling DN et al (1995) Mutational disruption of the biosynthesis genes coding for the antifungal metabolite 2,4 diacetylphloroglucinol does not influence the ecological fitness of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 in the rhizosphere of sugarbeets. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3002–3007
Cézard C, Farvacques N, Sonnet P (2015) Chemistry and biology of pyoverdines, Pseudomonas primary siderophores. Curr Med Chem 22:165–186
Chabot R, Antoun H, Cescas MP (1993) Stimulation de la croissance du maïs et de la laitue romaine par des microorganismes dissolvant le phosphate inorganique. Can J Microbiol 39:941–947
Chen H, Qualls RG, Miller GC (2002) Adaptive responses of Lepidium latifolium to soil flooding: biomass allocation, adventitious rooting, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production. Environ Exp Bot 48:119–128
Chen YP, Rekha PD, Arun AB et al (2006) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Appl Soil Ecol 34:33–41
Chernyad’ev II (2009) The protective action of cytokinins on the photosynthetic machinery and productivity of plants under stress. Appl Biochem Microbiol 45:351–362
Chin-A-Woeng TF, De Priester W, Van Der Bij AJ et al (1997) Description of the colonization of a gnotobiotic tomato rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain VCS365, using scanning electron microscopy. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 10:79–86
Chin-A-Woeng TF, Bloemberg GV, Mulders IHM et al (2000) Root colonization by phenazine-1-carboxamide producing bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL 1391 is essential for biocontrol of tomato foot and root rot. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 13:1340–1345
Chin-A-Woeng TF, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2003) Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria. New Phytol 157:503–523
Choi O, Kim J, Kim J-G et al (2008) Pyrrolquinoline quinone is a plant growth promotion factor produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens B16. Plant Physiol 146:657–668
Choudhary DK, Prakash A, Wray V et al (2009) Insights of the fluorescent pseudomonads in plant growth regulation. Curr Sci 97:170–179
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J et al (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959
Costacurta A, Keijers V, Vanderleyden J (1994) Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of an Azospirillum brasilense indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase gene. Mol Gen Genet 243:463–472
Crowley DE (2006) Microbial siderophores in the plant rhizosphere. In: Barton LL, Abadía J (eds) Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 169–198
Crozier A, Kamiya Y, Bishop G et al (2000) Biosynthesis of hormones and elicitor molecules. In: Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Am Soc Plant Physiol, Rockville, pp 850–929
D’aes J, Hua GKH, De Maeyer K et al (2011) Biological control of Rhizoctonia root rot on bean by phenazine and cyclic lipopeptide producing Pseudomonas CMR12a. Phytopathology 101:996–1004
Dangl JL, Horvath DM, Staskawicz BJ (2013) Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 341:746–751
Danhorn T, Fuqua C (2007) Biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 61:401–422
Davies PJ (1995) The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence and functions. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–12
Davies J, Spiegelman GB, Yim G (2006) The world of sub-inhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:445–453
De Mot R, Proost P, Van Damme J et al (1992) Homology of the root adhesion of Pseudomonas fluorescens OE 28.3 with porin F of P.neruginosa and P. syringae. Mol Gen Genet 231:489–493
De Salamone IEG, Hynes RK, Nelson LM (2001) Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Can J Microbiol 47:404–411
De Weert S, Vermeiren H, Mulder IH et al (2002) Flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components is an important trait for tomato root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15:1173–1180
De Weger LA, Van Der Vlugt CI, Wijfjes AH et al (1987) Flagella of a plant-growth-stimulating Pseudomonas fluorescens strain are required for colonization of potato roots. J Bacteriol 169:2769–2773
De Werra P, Péchy-Tarr M, Keel C et al (2009) Role of gluconic acid production in the regulation of biocontrol traits of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4162–4174
Devi SI, Talukdar N, Sharma KC (2011) Screening of rhizobacteria for their plant growth promotion ability and antagonism against damping off and root rot diseases of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) Indian J Microbiol 51:14–21
Dey KB (1988) Phosphate solubilizing organisms in improving fertility status. In: Sen SP, Palit P (eds) Biofertilizers: potentialities and problems. Plant Physiology Forum, Naya Prokash, Calcutta, pp 237–248
Dubeikovsky AN, Mordukhova EA, Kochetkov VV et al (1993) Growth promotion of black currant softwood cuttings by recombinant strain Pseudomonas fluorescens BSP53a synthesizing an increased amount of indole-3-acetic acid. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1277–1281
Dubuis C, Keel C, Haas D (2007) Dialogues of root-colonizing biocontrol pseudomonads. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:311–328
Duffy BK, Défago G (1999) Environmental factors modulating antibiotic and siderophore biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2429–2438
Duine JA, Frank JJ, van Zeeland JK (1979) Glucose dehydrogenase from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus: a “quinoprotein”. FEBS Lett 108:443–446
Duine JA, van der Meer RA, Groen BW (1990) The cofactor pyrrolquinoline quinone. Annu Rev Nutr 10:297–318
Egamberdieva D (2005) Characterization of Pseudomonas species isolated from the rhizosphere of plants grown in serozem soil, semiarid region of Uzbekistan. Sci World J 5:501–509
Fankem H, Tchakounte GVT, Nkot LN et al (2015) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and soya bean (Glycine max) growth and nodulation as influenced by rock phosphate solubilizing bacteria under pot grown conditions. Int J Agric Pol Res 5:242–250
Fernando WD, Nakkeeran S, Zhang Y (2006) Biosynthesis of antibiotics by PGPR and its relation in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Siddiqui Z (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–109
Flemming H-C, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633
Frölich A, Buddrus-Schiemann K, Durner J et al (2012) Response of barley to root colonization by Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 under laboratory, greenhouse, and field conditions. J Plant Interact 7:1–9
Ghirardi S, Dessaint F, Mazurier S et al (2012) Identification of traits shared by rhizosphere-competent strains of fluorescent pseudomonads. Microb Ecol 64:725–737
Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117
Glick BR (2005) Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacteria enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1–7
Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:963401
Glick BR, Penrose D, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68
Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G et al (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London
Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J et al (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339
Goldstein A, Lester T, Brown J (2003) Research on the metabolic engineering of the direct oxidation pathway for extraction of phosphate from ore has generated preliminary evidence for PQQ biosynthesis in Escherichia coli as well as possible role for the highly conserved region of quinoprotein dehydrogenases. Biochem Biophys Acta 1647:266–271
Gopalakrishnan S, Humayun P, Kiran BK et al (2011) Evaluation of bacteria isolated from rice rhizosphere for biological control of charcoal rot of sorghum caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1313–1321
Govindappa M, Ravishankar RV, Lokesh S (2011) Screening of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates for biological control of Macrophomina phaseolina root-rot of safflower. Afr J Agric Res 6:6256–6266
Govindasamy V, Senthilkumar M, Gaikwad K et al (2008) Isolation and characterization of ACC deaminase gene from two plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Curr Microbiol 57:312–317
Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412
Gross H, Loper JE (2009) Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. Nat Prod Rep 26:1408–1446
Gross H, Stockwell VO, Henkels MD et al (2007) The genomisotopic approach: a systematic method to isolate products of orphan biosynthetic gene clusters. Chem Biol 14:53–63
Guiñazú LB, Andrés JA, Del Papa MF et al (2010) Response of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to single and mixed inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Biol Fertil Soils 46:185–190
Guiñazú LB, Andrés JA, Rovera M et al (2013) Evaluation of rhizobacterial isolates from Argentina, Uruguay and Chile for plant growth promoting characteristics and antagonistic activity towards Rhizoctonia sp. and Macrophomina sp. in vitro. Eur J Soil Biol 54:69–77
Gusain YS, Kamal R, Mehta CM et al (2015) Phosphate solubilizing and indole-3-acetic acid producing bacteria from the soil of Garhwal Hymalaya aimed to improve the growth of rice. J Environ Biol 36:310–307
Guyer A, De Vrieze M, Bönisch D et al (2015) The anti-Phytophthora effect of selected potato-associated Pseudomonas strains: from the laboratory to the field. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01309
Gyaneshwar P, Parekh LJ, Archana G et al (1999) Involvement of a phosphate-starvation inducible glucose dehydrogenase in soil phosphate solubilisation by Enterobacter asburiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 171:223–229
Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307–319
Haas D, Keel C (2003) Regulation of antibiotic production in root-colonizing Pseudomonas spp. and relevance for biological control of plant disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:117–153
Haas D, Keel C, Laville J et al (1991) Secondary metabolites of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 involved in the suppression of root diseases. In: Hennecke H, Verma DPS (eds) Advances in molecular genetics of plant-microbe interactions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 450–456
Hammami I, Hsouna AB, Hamdi N et al (2013) Isolation and characterization of rhizosphere bacteria for the biocontrol of the damping-off disease of tomatoes in Tunisia. C R Biol 336:557–564
Hatayama K, Wawai S, Shoun H et al (2005) Pseudomonas azotifigens sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from a compost pile. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1539–1544
Henry E, Yadeta KA, Coaker G (2013) Recognition of bacterial plant pathogens: local, systemic and transgenerational immunity. New Phytol 199:908–915
Hernández-León R, Rojas-Solís D, Contreras-Pérez M et al (2015) Characterization of the antifungal and plant growth-promoting effects of diffusible and volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Biol Control 81:83–92
Hinsa SM, Espinosa-Urgel M, Ramos JL et al (2003) Transition from reversible to irreversible attachment during biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 requires an ABC transporter and a large secreted protein. Mol Microbiol 49:905–918
Hua GKH, Höfte M (2015) The involvement of phenazines and cyclic lipopeptide sesselin in biocontrol of Rhizoctonia root rot on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by Pseudomonas sp. CMR12a is influenced by substrate composition. Plant Soil 388:243–253
James DW Jr, Gutterson NI (1986) Multiple antibiotics produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens HV37a and their differential regulation by glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:1183–1189
Jiao Z, Wu N, Hale L et al (2013) Characterisation of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca strain Pa40 with the ability to control wheat sharp eyespot disease. Ann Appl Biol 163:444–453
Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329
Jošić D, Pivić R, Miladinović M et al (2012a) Antifungal activity and genetic diversity of selected Pseudomonas spp. from maize rhizosphere in Vojvodina. Genetika 44:377–388
Jošić D, Protolipac K, Starović M et al (2012b) Phenazine producing Pseudomonas isolates decrease Alternaria tenuissima growth, pathogenicity and disease incidence on cardoon. Arch Biol Sci 64:1495–1503
Jun S-R, Wassenaar TM, Nookaew I et al (2016) Diversity of Pseudomonas genomes, including populus-associated isolates, as revealed by comparative genome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:375–383
Kahlon SS, Malhotra S (1986) Production of gibberellic acid by fungal mycelium immobilized in sodium alginate. Enzym Microb Technol 8:613–616
Kang S-M, Radhakrishnan R, Khan AL et al (2014) Gibberellin secreting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas putida H-2-3 modulates the hormonal and stress physiology of soybean to improve the plant growth under saline and drought conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem 84:115–124
Karadeniz A, Topcuoğlu ŞF, İnan S (2006) Auxin, gibberellin, cytokinin and abcissic acid production in some bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1061–1064
Karakoç S, Aksöz N (2006) Some optimal cultural parameters for gibberellic acid biosynthesis by Pseudomonas sp. Turk J Biol 30:81–85
Katiyar V, Goel R (2004) Siderophore-mediated plant growth promotion at low temperature by mutant of fluorescent pseudomonad. Plant Growth Regul 42:239–244
Katznelson H, Peterson EA, Rovatt JW (1962) Phosphate dissolving microorganisms on seed and in the root zone of plants. Can J Bot 40:1181–1186
Keel C, Schnider U, Maurhofer M et al (1992) Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0- importance of the bacterial secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5:4–13
Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA (2009) Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture – a review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:29–43
Khan MR, Brien EO, Carney BR et al (2010) A fluorescent pseudomonad shows potential for the control of net blotch disease of barley. Biol Control 54:41–45
King RW, Evans LT (2003) Gibberellins and flowering of grasses and cereals: prising open the lid of the “Florigen” black box. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 54:307–328
Kloepper J, Schroth M, Miller T (1980) Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 70:1078–1082
Krotzky A, Werner D (1987) Nitrogen fixation in Pseudomonas stutzeri. Arch Microbiol 147:48–57
Kwak Y-S, Weller DM (2013) Take-all of wheat and natural disease suppression: a review. Plant Pathol J 29:125–135
Lagzian A, Saberi Riseh R, Khodaygan P et al (2013) Introduced Pseudomonas fluorescens VUPf5 as an important biocontrol agent for controlling Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici the causal agent of take-all disease in wheat. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 46:2104–2116
Lanteigne C, Gadkar VJ, Wallon T et al (2012) Production of DAPG and HCN by Pseudomonas sp. LBUM300 contributes to the biological control of bacterial canker of tomato. Phytopathology 102:967–973
Latour X, Delorme S, Mirleau P et al (2003) Identification of traits implicated in the rhizosphere competence of fluorescent pseudomonads: description of a strategy based on population and model strain studies. Agronomie 23:397–405
Lee Y, Yeom J, Jim J et al (2010) Phenotypic and physiological alterations by heterologous acylhomoserine lactone synthase expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microbiology 156:3762–3772
León M, Yaryura P, Montecchia M et al (2009) Antifungal activity of selected indigenous Pseudomonas and Bacillus from the soybean rhizosphere. Int J Microbiol. doi:10.1155/2009/572049
Li Q, Saleh-Lakha S, Glick BR (2005) The effect of native and ACC deaminase-containing Azospirillum brasilense Cd 1843 on the rooting of carnation cuttings. Can J Microbiol 51:511–514
Loper JE, Buyer JS (1991) Siderophores in microbial interactions on plant surfaces. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 4:5–13
Loper JE, Hassan KA, Mavrodi DV et al (2012) Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: insights into diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLoS Genet 8:e10002784
Lugtenberg JB, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461–490
Maldonado-González MM, Prieto P, Ramos C et al (2013) From the root to the stem: interaction between the biocontrol root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 and the pathogen Pseudomonas savastanoi NCPPB 3335 in olive knots. Microb Biotechnol 6:275–287
Maleki M, Mostafaee S, Mokhtarnejad L et al (2010) Characterization of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CV6 isolated from cucumber rhizosphere in Varamin as a potential biocontrol agent. Aust J Crop Sci 4:676–683
Martinez-Toledo MV, Moreno RJ, Gonzalez-Lopez J (1988) Root exudates of Zea mays and production of auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins by Azobacter chroococcum. Plant Soil 110:149–152
Martínez-Viveros O, Jorquera MA, Crowley DE et al (2010) Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 10:293–319
Masalha J, Kosegarten H, Elmaci Ö et al (2000) The central role of microbial activity for iron acquisition in maize and sunflower. Biol Fertil Soils 30:433–439
Massart S, Perazzolli M, Höfte M et al (2015) Impact of the omic technologies for understanding the modes of action of biological control agents against plant pathogens. Biocontrol 60:725–746
Mavrodi DV, Blankenfeldt W, Thomashow LS (2006) Phenazine compounds in fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. biosynthesis and regulation. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:417–445
Mavrodi DV, Peever TL, Mavrodi OV et al (2010) Diversity and evolution of the phenazine biosynthesis pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:866–879
Mavrodi DV, Mavrodi OV, Parejko JA et al (2012a) Accumulation of the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylic acid in the rhizosphere of dryland cereals. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:804–812
Mavrodi OV, Walter N, Elateek S et al (2012b) Suppression of Rhizoctonia and Pythium root rot of wheat by new strains of Pseudomonas. Biol Control 62:93–102
Mavrodi DV, Parejko JA, Mavrodi OV et al (2013) Recent insights into the diversity, frequency and ecological roles of phenazines in fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Environ Microbiol 15:675–686
Mazurier S, Corberand T, Lemanceau P, Raaijmakers JM (2009) Phenazine antibiotics produced by fluorescent pseudomonads contribute to natural soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilt. ISME J 3:977–991
Mazzola M, Cook RJ, Thomashow LS et al (1992) Contribution of phenazine antibiotic biosynthesis to the ecological competence of fluorescent pseudomonads in soil habitats. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2616–2614
McSpadden Gardener BB, Gutierrez LJ, Joshi R et al (2007) Distribution and biocontrol potential of phlD + pseudomonads in corn and soybean fields. Phytopathology 95:715–724
Mendes R, Kruijt M, De Bruijn I et al (2011) Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100
Meyer JM, Gruffaz C, Raharinosy V et al (2008) Siderotyping of fluorescent Pseudomonas: molecular mass determination by mass spectrometry as a powerful pyoverdine siderotyping method. Biometals 21:259–271
Migula W (1894) Über ein neues System der Bakterien. Arb Bakteriologischen Inst Tech Hochschule Karlsruhe 1:235–238
Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:165–199
Misra HS, Rajpurohit YS, Khairnar NP (2012) Pyrroloquinoline-quinone and its versatile roles in biological processes. J Biosci 37:313–325
Morohoshi T, Wang WZ, Suto T et al (2013) Phenazine antibiotic production and antifungal activity are regulated by multiple quorum-sensing systems in Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca StFRB508. J Biosci Bioeng 116:580–584
Mrabet M, Elkahoui S, Tarhouni B et al (2015) Potato seed dressing with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain RZ9 enhances yield and reduced black scurf. Phytopathol Mediterr 54:265–274
Mullen MD (2005) Phosphorus in soils: biological interactions. In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C, Powlson D et al (eds) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Academic, Oxford, pp 210–215
Müller H, Zachow C, Alavi M et al (2013) Complete genome sequence of the sugar beet endophyte Pseudomonas poae RE* 1-1-14, a disease-suppressive bacterium. Genome Announc 1:e00020–e00013
Negi YK, Prabha D, Garg SK et al (2011) Genetic diversity among cold-tolerant fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates from Indian Hymalayas and their characterization for biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activities. J Plant Growth Regul 30:128–143
Nelson K, Weinel C, Paulsen I et al (2002) Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 4:799–808
Ng W-L, Bassler BL (2009) Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu Rev Genet 43:197–222
Nieto KF, Frankenberger WT (1990) Microbial production of cytokinins. Soil Biochem 6:191–248
Noreen R, Ali SA, Hasan KA et al (2015) Evaluation of biocontrol potential of fluorescent Pseudomonas associated with root nodules of mungbean. Crop Prot 75:18–24
O’Sullivan DJ, O’Gara F (1992) Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiol Rev 56:662–676
Oberhänsli T, Défago G, Haas D (1991) Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis in the biocontrol strain CHA0 of Pseudomonas fluorescens: role of tryptophan side chain oxidase. J Gen Microbiol 137:2273–2279
Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S (2015) Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745
Palleroni NJ (1984) Genus I Pseudomonas. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds) Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore, pp 141–168
Palleroni NJ, Kunisawa R, Contopoulou R et al (1973) Nucleic acid homologies in the genus Pseudomonas. Int J Syst Bacteriol 23:333–339
Parejko JA, Mavrodi DV, Mavrodi OV et al (2012) Population structure and diversity of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. from dryland cereal fields of Central Washington State (USA). Microb Ecol 64:226–241
Park JY, Han SH, Lee JH et al (2011) Draft genome sequence of the biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas putida B001, an oligotrophic bacterium that induces systemic resistance to plant diseases. J Bacteriol 193:6795–6796
Pastor N, Reynoso M, Tonelli M et al (2010) Potential biological control Pseudomonas sp. PCI2 against damping-off of tomato caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. J Plant Pathol 92:737–745
Pastor N, Carlier E, Andrés J et al (2012) Characterization of rhizosphere bacterial for control of phytopathogenic fungi of tomato. J Environ Manag 95:S332–S337
Patra DD (2012) Production, purification, and characterization of antifungal metabolite from Pseudomonas aeruginosa SD12, a new strain obtained from tannery waste polluted soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:674–683
Patrick JW (1987) Are the hormones involved in assimilate transport? In: Hoad GV, Lenton JR, Jackson MB et al (eds) Hormone action in plant development: a critical appraisal. Butterworths Co. Ltd, Long Ashton, pp 178–188
Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220
Patten CL, Glick BR (2002) Role of Pseudomonas putida indole acetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795–3801
Paulsen IT, Press CM, Ravel J et al (2005) Complete genome sequence of the plant commensal Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Nat Biotechnol 23:873–878
Penrose DM, Glick BR (2003) Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol Plant 118:10–15
Perneel M, Heyrman J, Adiobo A et al (2007) Characterization of CMR5c and CMR12a, novel fluorescent Pseudomonas strains from the cocoyam rhizosphere with biocontrol activity. J Appl Microbiol 103:1007–1020
Persello-Cartiaux F, Nussaume L, Robaglia C (2003) Tales from the underground: molecular plant-rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell Environ 26:189–199
Pierson LS 3rd, Pierson EA (1996) Phenazine antibiotic production in Pseudomonas aureofaciens: role in rhizosphere ecology and pathogen suppression. FEMS Microbiol Lett 136:101–108
Pierson LS 3rd, Pierson EA (2010) Metabolism and function of phenazines in bacteria: impacts on the behavior of bacteria in the environment and biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:1659–1670
Pieterse CM, Poelman EH, Van Wees SC, Dicke M (2013) Induced plant responses to microbes and insects. Front Plant Sci. doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00475
Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL et al (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375
Podile AR, Kishore GK (2006) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: Gnanamanickam SS (ed) Plant-associated bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–230
Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LE, Newman DK (2006) Rethinking “secondary” metabolism: physiological role for phenazine antibiotics. Nat Chem Biol 2:71–78
Puopolo G, Aida R, Pierson L et al (2011) Selection of a new Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain for the biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radices-lycopersici. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:228–235
Quagliotto L, Azziz G, Bajsa N et al (2009) Three native Pseudomonas fluorescens strains tested under growth chamber and field conditions as biological agents against damping-off in alfalfa. Biol Control 51:42–50
Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M (2012) Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:403–424
Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM (1998) Natural plant protection by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp. in take-all decline soils. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:144–152
Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM (2001) Exploiting genotypic diversity of 2, 4-diacetyl phloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp.: characterization of superior root-colonizing P. fluorescens strain Q8r1-96. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2545–2554
Raaijmakers JM, Leeman M, Van Oorschot MM et al (1995) Dose-response relationships in biological control of Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 85:1075–1080
Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1997) Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:881–887
Raaijmakers JM, Bonsall RF, Weller DM (1999) Effect of population density of Pseudomonas fluorescens on production of 2,4-diacetyl phloroglucinol in the rhizosphere of wheat. Phytopathology 89:470–475
Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, De Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Anton Leeuw Int J G 81:537–547
Raghu K, MacRae IC (1966) Occurrence of phosphate-dissolving microorganisms in the rhizosphere of rice plants and in submerged soils. J Appl Bacteriol 29:582–586
Rainey PB (1999) Adaptation of Pseudomonas fluorescens to the plant rhizosphere. Environ Microbiol 1:243–257
Ramesh R, Joshi A, Ghanekar M (2009) Pseudomonads: major antagonistic endophytic bacteria to suppress bacterial wilt pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum in the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:47–55
Reed MLE, Glick BR (2005) Growth of canola (Brassica napus) in the presence of plant growth-promoting bacteria and either copper or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Can J Microbiol 51:1061–1969
Rodríguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339
Rong X, Gurel FB, Meulia T et al (2012) Draft genome sequences of the Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains Wayne1R and Wood1R. J Bacteriol 194:724–725
Roquigny R, Arseneault T, Gadkar V et al (2015) Complete genome sequence of biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM223. Genome Announc 3:e00443–e00415
Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S et al (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:635–648
Salisbury FB, Ross CW (1992) Plant physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, pp 329–407
Salisbury SA, Forrest HS, Cruse WBT et al (1979) A novel coenzyme from bacterial primary alcohol dehydrogenases. Nature 280:843–844
Schauder S, Bassler BL (2001) The languages of bacteria. Genes Dev 15:1468–1480
Schroth MN, Hancock JG (1982) Disease-suppressive soil and root-colonizing bacteria. Science 216:1376–1381
Selin C, Habibian R, Poritsanos N et al (2010) Phenazines are not essential for Pseudomonas chlororaphis PA23 biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, but do play a role in biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:73–83
Sen S, Rai M, Acharya R et al (2009) Biological control of pathogens causing the Cymbidium pseudobulb rot complex using fluorescent Pseudomonas strain BRL-1. J Plant Pathol 91:751–755
Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2006) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) Lett Appl Microbiol 42:155–159
Sharma A, Johri BN (2003) Growth promoting influence of siderophore-producing Pseudomonas strains GRP3A and PRS9 in maize (Zea mays L.) under iron limiting conditions. Microbiol Res 158:243–248
Shen X, Chen M, Hu H et al (2012) Genome sequence of Pseudomonas chlororaphis GP72, a root colonizing biocontrol strain. J Bacteriol 194:1269–1270
Shirzad A, Fallahzadeh-Mamaghani V, Pazhouhandeh M (2012) Antagonistic potential of fluorescent pseudomonads and control of crown and root rot of cucumber caused by Phytophthora drechsleri. Plant Pathol J 28:1–9
Siddiqui Z (2005) PGPR: prospective biocontrol agents of plant pathogens. Springer, Dordrecht
Silby MW, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Vernikos GS et al (2009) Genomic and genetic analyses of diversity and plant interactions of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Genome Biol 10:R51
Silby MW, Winstanley C, Godfrey SA et al (2011) Pseudomonas genomes: diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:652–680
Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R (2007) Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:425–448
Spoel SH, Dong X (2012) How do plants achieve immunity? Defense without specialized immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol 12:89–100
Sponsel VM (2003) Gibberellins. In: Henry HL, Norman AW (eds) Encyclopedia of hormones, vol 2. Academic, Boston, pp 29–40
Stites TE, Mitchell AE, Rucker RB (2000) Physiological importance of quinoenzymes and the O-quinone family of cofactors. J Nutr 130:719–727
Tambong JT, Höfte M (2001) Phenazines are involved in biocontrol of Pythium myriotylum on cocoyam by Pseudmonas aeruginosa PNA1. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:511–521
Tewari S, Arora NK (2014) Multifunctional exopolysaccharides from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PF23 involved in plant growth stimulation, biocontrol and stress amelioration in sunflower under saline conditions. Curr Microbiol 69:484–494
Thonart P, Ongena M, Henry G (2012) PAMPs, MAMPs, DAMPs and others: an update on the diversity of plant immunity elicitors. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 16:257–268
Trewavas A (2000) Signal perception and transduction. In: Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Amer Soc Plant Physiol, Rockville, pp 930–987
Van De Mortel JE, De Vos RC, Dekkers E et al (2012) Metabolic and transcriptomic changes induced in Arabidopsis by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens SS101. Plant Physiol 160:2173–2188
Van Der Voort M, Meijer HJ, Schmidt Y et al (2015) Genome mining and metabolic profiling of the rhizosphere bacterium Pseudomonas sp. SH-C52 for antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00693
Van Loon L, Bakker PAHM (2006) Induced systemic resistance as a mechanism of disease suppression by rhizobacteria. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 39–66
Van Wees SC, De Swart EA, Van Pelt JA et al (2000) Enhancement of induced disease resistance by simultaneous activation of salicylate- and jasmonate-dependent defense pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:8711–8716
Verhagen BW, Glazebrook J, Zhu T et al (2004) The transcriptome of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:895–908
Vesper SJ (1987) Production of pili (fimbriae) by Pseudomonas fluorescens and correlation with attachment to corn roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1397–1405
Walters DR, Ratsep J, Havis ND (2013) Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: challenges for the future. J Exp Bot 64:1263–1280
Wang C, Knill E, Glick BR et al (2000) Effect of transferring 1-amino cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth-promoting and disease-suppressive capacities. Can J Microbiol 46:898–907
Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407
Weller DM (2007) Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97:250–256
Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1994) Current challenges in introducing beneficial microorganisms into the rhizosphere. In: O’Gara F, Dowling DN, Boesten B (eds) Molecular ecology of rhizosphere microorganisms: biotechnology and the release of GMOs. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, pp 1–18
Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, Gardener BB et al (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348
Williams P (2007) Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiology 153:3923–3938
Winslow CEA, Broadhurst J, Buchanan RE et al (1917) The families and genera of the bacteria. Preliminary report of the society of American Bacteriologists on characterization and classification of bacterial types. J Bacteriol 2:505–566
Wu XA, Monchy S, Taghavi S et al (2011) Comparative genomics and functional analysis of nich-specific adaptation in Pseudomonas putida. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:299–323
Xie H, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1996) Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 that overproduce indole acetic acid. Curr Microbiol 32:67–71
Yang M-M, Mavrodi DV, Mavrodi OV et al (2011) Biological control of take-all by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. from Chinese wheat fields. Phytopathology 101:1481–1491
Zhou T, Chen D, Li C et al (2012) Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas brassicacearum J12 as an antagonist against Rasltonia solanacearum and identification of its antimicrobial components. Microbiol Res 167:388–394
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roquigny, R., Novinscak, A., Biessy, A., Filion, M. (2017). Pseudomonadaceae: From Biocontrol to Plant Growth Promotion. In: Mehnaz, S. (eds) Rhizotrophs: Plant Growth Promotion to Bioremediation. Microorganisms for Sustainability, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4862-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4862-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4861-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4862-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)