Abstract
The growing demand for continual improvement in the engineering applications of thermoplastic and thermoset polymer materials compared with metals in various applications led to the emergence of hybrid nanocomposites by the addition of different nano fillers, with advanced properties. Nano fillers such as carbon black, pyrogenic silica, nano oxides and metal particles are being used as additives in polymers from decades. However, the increasing stringent environmental legislation and consumer awareness highlights the importance of natural, low cost and abundant clay materials such as nanoclays. The hybridization of natural fiber with nanoclay is interestingly positive due to the tendency of nanoclay to upsurge both flexibility and rigidity of the natural fiber in one step. The most promising nanoclay involved in the modification of polymers and natural fibers reinforced polymer composite are montmorillonite, organoclay, saponite and halloysite nanotubes. Nanoclay/natural fibers hybrid nanocomposites have engrossed great attention since their discovery due to their wide variety of properties in food packaging, biomedical devices, automotive industries and other consumer applications with better thermal, physical, mechanical, optical and barrier properties. Present article designed to be a comprehensive source of recent literature and study on nanoclay fillers, its different classes, modification of polymers by nanoclay and their varied applications. This article also intended to covers the recent advances in natural fiber/nanoclay hybrid polymer nanocomposites research study, including their different commercial applications.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
1.1 Hybrid Composites
The word “hybrid” is of Greek-Latin origin. Hybridization is a process of incorporating of two reinforcements (either synthetic fibers/nano fillers/natural/ or metallic fibers) in one polymeric matrix phase or the incorporation of single reinforcements in polymer blends in order to yield better properties such as (high mechanical strength, compressive strength, stiffness, thermal stability and lowered water absorption properties) which cannot be realized in conventional composite materials (Borba et al. 2014; Saba et al. 2014). Hybrid materials are very advanced composites materials consisting of two or more different constituents at the molecular or nanometer level. Properties of hybrid composites is a weighed sum of the individual components, thus it provide combination of properties such as tensile modulus, compressive strength and impact strength (Gururaja and Hari Rao 2012). Hybrid composite materials have extensive engineering application where strength to weight ratio, ease of fabrication and low cost are required. The hybrid composite properties with two different fibers are exclusively governed by the individual fibers length, fibers orientation and fibers content, extent of intermingling of fibers, fibers arrangement and fiber-matrix bonding.
Researchers concluded from their study that the addition of a very small amount of nanoparticle into a matrix can improve both thermal and mechanical properties significantly without compromising the weight or processability of the composite (Hossen et al. 2015). Until now many research works has been made on natural fiber hybrid nanocomposite materials by using nano particles such as nano tube, metal oxides, nanoclays, carbon nanofiber and other nano particles for varied advanced applications.
1.2 Natural Fibers
Currently researchers are concerning more towards the natural fibers as cost effective and light weight reinforced materials. A huge variety of different kinds of natural fibers including cellulosic, wool and animal fibers are abundantly available all around the world (Thakur et al. 2012, 2014). Natural fibers can be classified into different types depending upon their origin such as plant fibers and animal fibers (Eichhorn et al. 2010; Cherian et al. 2011). Natural fibers are of different types based on their source of origin from the plant such as leaf (PALF, sisal, banana etc.), bast (kenaf, jute, hemp etc.), fruit (OPEFB, coir) and seed (cotton, kapok). The mechanical properties of natural fibers (kenaf, jute) are found to be comparable with the commercial synthetic fibers, making the natural fibers highly preferable to synthetic fibers in automotive and other high end applications where weight and stiffness are of primary concerns (Saba et al. 2015b; Thakur et al. 2013). Natural fibers exhibit a number of advantages in terms of lower densities, specific modulus, cost per weight, cost per unit length besides their renewable and biodegradable nature required for making composite and green composite with bio-resin (Dittenber and GangaRao 2012; Thakur and Thakur 2014). Some of the most common natural fiber that are used as reinforcement in polymer for fabricating hybrid polymer composite especially with nano sized fillers are displayed in Fig. 1.
1.3 Composites
Composite materials have been used by the people of earlier civilization since many centuries. One of finest example include the preparation of bricks for building construction using straw and mud (Akil et al. 2011; Eichhorn et al. 2010). Composite materials are the most adaptable engineering materials having the perfect combination of two different constituents, reinforcing natural/synthetic fibers and plastic polymeric matrix holding the perfect physical or chemical properties of each component (Yan et al. 2014). Moreover, both the constituent of composite materials remain separate and distinct on a macroscopic level within the finished structure (Bajpai et al. 2012). The term “natural fiber reinforced composite” refers to natural fibers reinforced in some polymeric matrix (thermoplastic or thermoset; natural or synthetic). A number of different polymers are used as matrix materials for composite fabrication depending upon the type of applications (Teacǎ et al. 2013). The matrix hold and transfer the loads along the reinforced materials (organic to inorganic) in polymer composites (Singh et al. 2013; Saba et al. 2015a) and the reinforcing material (usually fibers) determines the overall properties (Valença et al. 2015). Natural fiber composites are cost effective, possess tool wearing rates, thermal stability, acoustic properties, better formability and confers health safety for manufacturer (Saba et al. 2015b; Batouli et al. 2014).
1.4 Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Nanoscience is the study of phenomena and manipulation of materials at atomic, macromolecular and at molecular scales, where properties differ significantly from those at a larger scale (Saba et al. 2014). The term “nanotechnology” was invented by Taniguchi in 1974 and is defined as “the science of nano materials (1–100 nm)” and systems with structures and components displaying improved chemical, physical, thermal and biological properties”. Nanotechnology is the advanced technology that deals and describes the design, production, characterization, and application of nano based materials and systems. The field of nanoscience and nanotechnology has blossomed over the last 20 years (Galpaya 2012; Kuilla et al. 2010) and gaining significance in areas of biosensors, biomedical, nanomedicine, computing, aeronautics, polymer modification and many other applications owing to their high surface area with better tendency to amend materials properties. The current applications of nanotechnology in different industrial sectors are shown in Fig. 2.
1.5 Nanocomposites
The discovery of polymer nanocomposites by the Toyota research group has opened a new dimension in the field of materials science (Kuilla et al. 2010; Kojima et al. 2011; Ibeh and Bubacz 2008). A nanocomposite belong to the nanomaterials groups, where nanoparticles have been added to improve a particular property of the material (Saba et al. 2015a, b, c; Marquis et al. 2011). The nanocomposites material encompasses a large variety of systems and frequently regarded as amorphous multiphase solid material (such as the structure of the bone), made of distinctly different components at the nanometer scale having at least one or two or three of the phases dimensions in nano meter range (1–100 nm) (Saba et al. 2014). Moreover, according to the matrix materials, nanocomposites can be classified into three different categories (a) ceramic matrix nanocomposites (CMNC) such as SiO2/Ni, Al2O3/TiO2 (b) metal matrix nanocomposites (MMNC) such as Ni/Al2O3, Co/Cr and (c) polymer matrix nanocomposites (PMNC) such as thermoplastic/thermoset polymer/layered silicates (Raman et al. 2012). Nanocomposites emerged as appropriate substitutes to overwhelmed the limitations offered by monolithics and microcomposites, owing to the exceptionally high surface to volume ratio or high aspect ratio of the nano sized reinforcing phase (Boufi et al. 2014). Polymer nanocomposites often exhibit better chemical and physical properties dramatically different from the corresponding pure polymers. The polymer nanocomposites properties are governed by the incorporated nanoparticles shape, size, concentration and interactions with the polymer matrix (Karger-Kocsis et al. 2015; Armentano et al. 2010; Abdelrasoul et al. 2015). Nanocomposite however pretend some preparation challenges related with the dispersion and stoichiometry control in the nanocluster phase (Raman et al. 2012).
Currently, nanocomposites have attracted great interest, both in industry and in academia, due to their unique properties and multi-functionality that are well applicable in various fields (Saba et al. 2014) as compared with traditional composites (Babaei et al. 2014). Furthermore, despite of their nano dimensions, most of the processing techniques of nanocomposites remain almost the same as in microcomposites (Saba et al. 2015a, b, c). Several technique are been utilized to characterize or probe the structure and properties of polymer nanocomposites are shown in Fig. 3.
1.6 Nano Particles
Nanometer scale items (10−9 m) are defined by the term nano. A nanometer is 80,000 times thinner than a human hair and are equivalent to the billionth of a meter (Saba et al. 2015a, b, c; Raghavan et al. 2012). Nano particle or nano filler are the doping agent that are distributed in the polymer matrix of a composite having at least one of their dimensions in the nanoscale range (Dastjerdi and Montazer 2010). Currently nano fillers either from natural or synthetic source is of great interest and regarded as the most promising materials of the future owing to their unique properties in comparison with bulk counterparts. The most common nano fillers include carbon nanotubes, laminated alumosilicates (clays), nano fibers, ultra-disperse diamonds (nano diamonds), inorganic nanotubes, fullerenes, nano metal oxides, calcium carbonate, metallic nanoparticles, POSS and graphene (Henrique et al. 2009; Dey et al. 2016). Addition of nano fillers significantly improve or adjust the variable properties of the materials including physical, mechanical, optical, electrical and thermal properties, sometimes in synergy with conventional or traditional fillers (Saba et al. 2014; Shalwan and Yousif 2014). The nano materials can be synthesized by a variety of methods such as chemical, biological and mechanical techniques. The techniques involved in the synthesis are listed in Fig. 4.
Inorganic and organic nano fillers has gained considerable interest owing to their unique properties and numerous potential applications in the aerospace, automotive, electronics and construction industries (Kuilla et al. 2010; Potts et al. 2011). However, currently the majority of research are focused on polymer nanocomposites based on layered materials of a natural origin, such as a montmorillonite type of layered silicate compounds or synthetic clay (layered double hydroxide) (Li et al. 2009b; Kuilla et al. 2010; Paul and Robeson 2008). The nanoclay reinforced polymer composites displays vast potential applications in the variety of areas such as electronics, sensors, information storage, catalysis and structural components (Kushwaha and Kumar 2011; Subramaniyan and Sun 2008). Research study illustrates that the usual content of lamellar nanoclay and organo-modified montmorillonite is in the range of 5–10 wt% due to their high aspect ratio (more than 1000), high surface area (more than 750 m2/g) and higher modulus values (176 GPa) (Uddin 2013). Depending upon the processing conditions and characteristics of both the polymer matrix and organoclay, the in situ dispersion of organoclay inside the host polymer by melt blending can be more or less achieved, leading to intercalated or exfoliated nanocomposites. The general scheme of melt compounding and film casting methods involved in the preparation of nanoclay polymer composites are shown in Fig. 5.
2 Clay Minerals
Clay deposits composed of clay minerals (phyllosilicate minerals) (Prasanth et al. 2013; Morsy et al. 2011). Clay is a naturally occurring mineral composed primarily of fine grained minerals. These minerals shows plasticity owing to variable water content and on drying or fired can be hardened (Zhang et al. 2015). The most typical structure of clay mineral are displayed in (Fig. 6).
2.1 Nanoclays
Nanoclays is the good example of naturally occurring nanomaterials and are generally used for a clay mineral having a phyllosilicate or sheet structure with a thickness of about 1 nm and surfaces about 50–150 nm in one dimension (Sedaghat 2013; Pavlidou and Papaspyrides 2008). Nanoclays are thus the general term for the layered mineral silicates nanoparticles having high aspect ratio. Depending on morphology of nano particles and chemical composition nanoclays are organized into various classes such as illite, halloysite, bentonite, kaolinite, montmorillonite, hectorite and chlorite (Pavlidou and Papaspyrides 2008). Researchers explored that the nanoclays can be obtained from raw clay minerals through fewer steps (Uddin 2013), instead of the several general synthesis techniques of nano particles. Descriptions of processing stages used in converting raw clay mineral into a nanoclay mineral are displayed in Fig. 7 (Uddin 2013).
The layered structure enables the material to either swell or shrink depending on its water uptake tendency. Moreover, the purity and cation exchange capacity of the nanoclay are one of the critical properties, as it provides the surface activity required for inclusion of modifiers and for surface treatments. The typical structure of the sodium based MMT are shown in Fig. 8 (Paul and Robeson 2008).
Nanoclays products are typically modified with ammonium salts and are often called “Organically modified nanoclays or organoclays’’ (Zhang et al. 2015). Organoclays are one of the attractive and promising hybrid organic inorganic nanomaterials generally used for polymers and polymer based composites modification. The synthesis of organoclay is shown in Fig. 9. The clay surfaces modification render them organophilic to make them compatible with hydrophobic organic polymers (Jahanmardi et al. 2013).
Researchers stated that the structure of nanoclays or its dispersion in resins are of various types and can be characterized as phase separated, intercalated, or exfoliated displayed in Fig. 10 (Nabil et al. 2015).
2.2 Platy Nanoclays
The 2:1 phyllosilicates family of nanoclay is the most commonly used layered silicate in polymer nanocomposites (Jahanmardi et al. 2013). Their two-dimensional layers are made up of two tetrahedral coordinated silicon atoms fused to an edge-shared octahedral sheet of either aluminium or magnesium hydroxide. MMT, talc, hectorite, pyrophyllite, nontronite and saponite are the members of the layered smectite clay group (Sedaghat 2013; Henrique et al. 2009).
2.3 MMT Nanoclays
MMT nanoclays since 1847 have gained much research interests over the past decade. MMT was first labelled for its occurrence in montmorillon mineral in department of Vienne (France) more than 50 years before the discovery of bentonite in the US (Özcan et al. 2004; Ursache and Rodrigues 2014). However, chemically, it is hydrated sodium calcium aluminium magnesium silicate hydroxide (Na, Ca)0.33(Al, Mg)2(Si4O10)(OH)2 · nH2O (Shirini et al. 2012; Sedaghat 2013). Most generally it is merged with muscovite, chlorite, illite, kaolinite and cookeite (Ehlmann et al. 2007). Iron, potassium and other cations are the common substitutes, but their ratios however varies greatly with source (Uddin 2008). MMT nanoclays are similar like saponite clay, belongs to extremely soft phyllosilicate group of minerals having extremely small nano sized particles, with fine layered grained structure (Shirini et al. 2012). MMT typically form in microscopic crystals and are derived from bentonite ore, forming anisotropic platy clay structure.
MMT is a subclass or member of the natural smectite group (2:1 clay), having 2 tetrahedral sheets sandwiching a central octahedral sheet. Crystal structure of 2:1 layered smectite nanosheet (MMT) are illustrated in Fig. 11 (Nakato and Miyamoto 2009). Thus MMT consist of aluminosilicate layers surface-substituted with metal cations stacked in ~10 µm-sized multilayer stacks. The particles are plate-shaped with an average diameter around 1 μm with the surface dimensions generally 300 to more than 600 nm, resulting in an unusually high aspect ratio (Nakato and Miyamoto 2009). MMT featured by having better cation exchange capacity and 50 % octahedral charge (due to isomorphous substitution of Mg for Al) (Srasra et al. 1994; Chan et al. 2011a, b).
Naturally occurring MMT is highly hydrophilic. The MMT water content tendency varies greatly and it increases greatly in volume when it absorbs water. Researchers also synthesized modified MMT through clay surface modification, since polymers are generally organophilic, the unmodified nanoclay disperses with great effort in polymers. After modification (“surface compatibilization or intercalation”) the MMT can become compatible (organophilic) to the conventional petroleum polymers and dispersed readily in polymers for better properties in nanocomposites (Nakato and Miyamoto 2009).
2.4 Halloysite Nanotubes (HNTs)
Halloysite nanotubes were firstly reported by Berthier as a di-octahedral 1:1 clay mineral of the kaolin group in 1826, and its deposits are extensively found widely in the soils of countries such as France, China, Belgium, New Zealand and Australia (Du et al. 2010). HNTs are unique and versatile white and slight red nanomaterials (Fig. 12a), formed naturally within the earth over millions of years, due to strain caused by lattice mismatch between adjacent silicon dioxide and aluminium oxide layers (Kamble et al. 2012). The stone-like raw halloysite is easily ground into powder (Fig. 12b) (Liu et al. 2014).
HNT is the naturally occurring double layered aluminosilicate (Al2 Si2 O5(OH)4 · 2H2O), ultra-tiny hollow tubular structure with diameters typically lesser than 100 nm and with lengths typically ranging from about 500 nm to over 1.2 μm (Kamble et al. 2012). HNT model and its SEM micrograph are shown in Fig. 13a, b. The HNTs rapidly emerged as a raw material for the future because of being relatively cheaper, abundant and sustainable nature compared to commercial and expensive CNTs. They are chemically similar to kaolin clay with several interesting applications in the construction industry (Yunsheng et al. 2008; Montes et al. 2015). Recently researchers developed two types of halloysite nanotubes (single walled and multi walled) models to amplify effectively its nanotechnology applications (Zhang et al. 2015).
3 Nanoclay Polymer Composites
Nowadays the growing concern towards the utilization of renewable materials as filler in the matrix highlights greatly the importance of layered silicates clay minerals as nano filler owing to its availability and versatility (Ray and Okamoto 2003). MMT and organoclays are widely used for dispersion in polymers due to the high aspect ratio and the large interface of the polymer nanoclay interaction in the polymer composites (Fareed and Stamboulis 2014). Toyota research group in the early 90s, declared the first use of nanoclays reinforcement in the manufacturing of nylon-6-based nanoclay composites. They concluded that addition of nanoclays perfectly influence the crystallization process and the structural changes (Sandler et al. 2004). Untill now a variety of polymers except a few hydrophilic polymers such as poly (vinyl alcohol) and poly(ethylene oxide) which are modified by organoclay are well reported in literature.
Depending on the process conditions and polymer/nanofillers bonding the layered silicates dispersed into the polymer matrix in different states of intercalation and/or exfoliation (Baniassadi et al. 2011). Polymer nanoclay composites involve the interaction of polymer matrix with the nano-plates of clay, formed by the dispersion of low weight percentages of nanoclay into polymers (Fareed and Stamboulis 2014). The three different types of nanocomposite usually results by the dispersion of nanoclay to the polymer matrix are shown in Fig. 14 (Baniassadi et al. 2011).
However, the exfoliated structures displayed far better properties compared to other two nanocomposites (Pollet et al. 2004). Nanoclay reinforced polymer composites and their laminates have excellent properties including enhanced physical (optical, dielectric, permeability, transparency and lower shrinkage), thermal (decomposition temperature, flammability, coefficient of thermal expansion and higher thermal stability) and mechanical properties (tensile toughness, tensile strength and tensile modulus) even at a very low filler loading with respect to pure polymers (Babaei et al. 2014; Hossen et al. 2015; Najafi et al. 2012). Untill now many research study were made, to investigate the effect of nanoclay loadings on the properties of different polymers. The nanoclays addition in very low weight percent (1–5 %) can significantly improves the properties of the polymer base. Some of the important research work on nanoclay based polymer composites were tabulated in Table 1.
4 Nanoclay Hybrid Polymer Composites
Many researchers have used MMT nanoclay as filler in hybrid polymeric composites and their laminates due to its well-known exfoliation/intercalation chemistry, surface reactivity, high surface area, cost effectiveness and easy availability (Hossen et al. 2015; Dewan et al. 2013). Some of the important research work on nanoclay based polymer composites were tabulated in Table 2. A variety of natural fibers (from jute to oil palm fibers, either in short fiber, nonwoven mat or in woven fabrics) are modified by the nanoclays.
5 Applications of Nanoclays and Polymer Nanoclay Composites
Clay materials are relatively commercially available, inexpensive, easily can be modified, non-corrosive and recyclable in nature (Shirini et al. 2012; Jahanmardi et al. 2013; Najafi et al. 2012). They have been explored from decades as they shows huge importance in various fields of agriculture, ceramics, construction and other industrial or domestic applications. Nanoclays (layered silicates) and organoclay are of considerable interest for bulk applications from many decades as they have high aspect ratio, large specific surface areas associated with platy layered morphology, to results an improvement in the mechanical properties of polymers. Nanoclays also being used as flame retardants in the plastics industry to improve fire safety of their products. Integrating nanoclays into the plastic reduces drastically the amount of combustible material through a protective layer preventing the spreading of the fire. The transparency of nanoclay are also being used in films for achieving maximum mechanical properties and optimum clarity, as the presence of impurities act as stress concentrators, resulting in poor impact and tensile properties (Zhang et al. 2015). Nanoclays also conveys some practical potential biomedical applications such as in anti-bacterial efficacy, sterilizing phenomenon, toxins adsorption and in membrane coating (Dastjerdi and Montazer 2010; Wilson 2003).
Currently, one of the major applications of nanoclays is in the fabrication of polymer clay nanocomposites. These natural nanomaterials also acts as a rheological modifiers and additives in paints, inks, greases and cosmetics, pollution control bio-systems carriers, delivery systems for the controlled release of drugs (Floody et al. 2009). The incorporation of small amount (0.5–5.0 wt%) of MMT in the polymer matrix modified the polymer leading to a remarkable improvement of the physical, mechanical, fracture, wear resistance, thermal stability, peak heat release rate, flame retardancy, biocompatibility and chemical properties of the resulting composite as compared to conventional materials (Li et al. 2010a, b; Kushwaha and Kumar 2011; Uddin 2013). Currently the most particularly polymers that are modified includes epoxy, polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene and nylon using platy nanoclay mineral (Uddin 2013). MMT clays and acid treated MMT also been extensively used in catalytic cracking, acid-based catalysis processes and in materials applications from past 60 years. Organoclays are potentially being used as gas absorbents, rheological modifiers, polymer nanocomposites and as drug delivery carriers (Matsuda et al. 2013; Shirini et al. 2012).
In recent time, HNTs are the economically available and relatively cheaper nano sized raw material as compared to morphologically similar MWCNTs to apply in conjunction with various polymers such as nitrile rubber, natural rubber and polypropylene to form polymer-halloysite composite nanotubes (Rawtani and Agrawal 2012). Halloysite is a nontoxic and biocompatible material, which makes it a potential candidate for medical applications and household products (Zhang et al. 2015).
HNTs displays vast non-biological and biological applications such as drug and DNA carrier, tissue engineering scaffold, for cellular response, for osteoblasts and fibroblasts response (Rawtani and Agrawal 2012; Liu et al. 2014). HNTs are the main active ingredient in the “living nature deep cleansing mask” (New Zealand) which deeply purifies and refines the facial pores. The hollow HNTs tube can be filled with various active ingredients to meet the requirements for household, cosmetics, personal care and extended release products (Liu et al. 2014). HNT also being used for atom transfer radical polymerization, layer-by-layer coatings on wood microfibers, polyurethane coatings, scratch resistance coatings, also acts as a sorbents for various contaminants and pollutants (Li et al. 2013). Nowadays they are also being used for catalytic conversions, differentiation studies, hydrocarbon processing, molecular hydrogen storing, dispersion improvement and as an enzymatic nano reactor (Rawtani and Agrawal 2012).
Polymer nanoclay composites are one of the most promising alternatives to steel and wood based polymer composite, initially developed for the aerospace industry. Table 3 summarizes the different applications of nanoclays and their polymeric nanocomposites.
They are now feature in almost every area of modern industrial production and enterprise, like automobiles, household appliances, medicine, weaponry, civil infrastructure and packaging (Floody et al. 2009). Polymer nanocomposites reinforced with HNTs possess highly increased tensile and flexural strength, toughness, elastic moduli, higher thermal stability, flame retardancy and unique crystallization behavior (Liu et al. 2014; Yuan et al. 2015).
6 Conclusion
Research activities in the area of nano-materials have been increased dramatically from past decades. Currently nanoclays are the most valuable nano fillers displaying great reinforcing effects due to their high thermal stability, improved mechanical strength, biocompatibility and great abundance. Natural tubules HNTs are unique, versatile and important class of nanoclays extensively used in modifying polymer in polymer composites formed by surface weathering of aluminosilicate minerals. We concluded that nanoclays minerals are the most promising alternative to expensive nano fillers such CNT’s, POSS and graphene in improving or modifying the polymer and polymer composite properties with exciting potential applications. The incorporation of naturally existing nano materials as filler in nanocomposites exhibit distinctly improved properties such as improved thermal stability, higher flame retardancy, reduced CTE, better mechanical performance and improved clarity for optical applications. Organoclay, MMT and HNTs are of considerable interest in the field of polymer nanocomposites both for structural and functional applications. In this review article, we provided an overview of the recent research regarding nanoclay including MMT, HNT, organically modified nanoclays, nanoclays based polymer nanocomposites and an insight into their different potential applications. This review paper expected to delivers valuable evidence or literature information for further research and in the elaborative study of novel nanoclay based macro-micro hybrid nano polymeric composites as compared to other nanocomposites derived from commercially synthetic nano fillers.
References
Abdelrasoul, G.N., Farkas, B., Romano, I., Diaspro, A., Beke, S.: Nanocomposite scaffold fabrication by incorporating gold nanoparticles into biodegradable polymer matrix: synthesis, characterization, and photothermal effect. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 56, 305–310 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.037
Akil, H.M., Omar, M.F., Mazuki, A.A.M., Safiee, S., Ishak, Z.A.M., Abu Bakar, A.: Kenaf fiber reinforced composites: a review. Mater. Des. 32, 4107–4121 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.008
Ali, E.S., Ahmad, S.: Bionanocomposite hybrid polyurethane foam reinforced with empty fruit bunch and nanoclay. Compos. Part B Eng. 43, 2813–2816 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.043
Armentano, I., Dottori, M., Fortunati, E., Mattioli, S., Kenny, J.M.: Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95, 2126–2146 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007
Arrakhiz, F.Z., Benmoussa, K., Bouhfid, R., Qaiss, A.: Pine cone fiber/clay hybrid composite: mechanical and thermal properties. Mater. Des. 50, 376–381 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.033
Babaei, I., Madanipour, M., Farsi, M., Farajpoor, A.: Physical and mechanical properties of foamed HDPE/wheat straw flour/nanoclay hybrid composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 56, 163–170 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.039
Bajpai, P.K., Singh, I., Madaan, J.: Comparative studies of mechanical and morphological properties of polylactic acid and polypropylene based natural fiber composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31, 1712–1724 (2012). doi:10.1177/0731684412447992
Baniassadi, M., Laachachi, A., Hassouna, F., Addiego, F., Muller, R., Garmestani, H., Ahzi, S., Toniazzo, V., Ruch, D.: Mechanical and thermal behavior of nanoclay based polymer nanocomposites using statistical homogenization approach. Compos. Sci. Technol. 71, 1930–1935 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.09.008
Bari, E., Taghiyari, H.R., Schmidt, O., Ghorbani, A., Aghababaei, H.: Effects of nano-clay on biological resistance of wood- plastic composite against five wood-deteriorating fungi. Maderas. Cienc. y Tecnol. 17, 205–212 (2015). doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2015005000020
Batouli, S.M., Zhu, Y., Nar, M., D’Souza, N.A.: Environmental performance of kenaf-fiber reinforced polyurethane: a life cycle assessment approach. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 164–173 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.064
Borba, P.M., Tedesco, A., Lenz, D.M.: Effect of reinforcement nanoparticles addition on mechanical properties of SBS/Curauá fiber composites. Mater. Res. 17, 412–419 (2014)
Boufi, S., Kaddami, H., Dufresne, A.: Mechanical performance and transparency of nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 299, 560–568 (2014). doi:10.1002/mame.201300232
Chan, M.-L., Lau, K.-T., Wong, T.-T., Hoe, M.-P., Hui, D.: Mechanism of reinforcement in a nanoclay/polymer composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 42, 1708–1712 (2011a). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.011
Chan, M.L., Lau, K.T., Wong, T.T., Cardona, F.: Interfacial bonding characteristic of nanoclay/polymer composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 860–864 (2011b). doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.016
Cherian, B.M., Leão, A.L., De Souza, S.F., Costa, L.M.M., De Olyveira, G.M., Kottaisamy, M., Nagarajand, E.R., Thomas, S.: Cellulose nanocomposites with nanofibres isolated from pineapple leaf fibers for medical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 86, 1790–1798 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.009
Dastjerdi, R., Montazer, M.: A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids Surf., B 79, 5–18 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.029
Dewan, M.W., Hossain, M.K., Hosur, M., Jeelani, S.: Thermomechanical properties of alkali treated jute-polyester/nanoclay biocomposites fabricated by VARTM process. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 128, 4110–4123 (2013). doi:10.1002/App.38641
Dey, A., Bajpai, O.P., Sikder, A.K., Chattopadhyay, S., Khan, M.A.S.: Recent advances in CNT/graphene based thermoelectric polymer nanocomposite: a proficient move towards waste energy harvesting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 653–671 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.004
Dittenber, D.B., GangaRao, H.V.S.: Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 43, 1419–1429 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019
Du, M., Guo, B., Jia, D.: Newly emerging applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Polym. Int. 59, 574–582 (2010). doi:10.1002/pi.2754
Ehlmann, B.L., Mustard, J.F., Bishop, J.L., Griffes, J.L.: New secondary minerals detected by MRO CRISM and their geologic settings: kaolinite, chlorite, illite/muscovite, and the possibility of serpentine or carbonate in Nili Fossae. LPI Contrib. 1353, 3270 (2007)
Eichhorn, S.J., Dufresne, A., Aranguren, M., Marcovich, N.E., Capadona, J.R., Rowan, S.J., Weder, C., Thielemans, W., Roman, M., Renneckar, S., Gindl, W., Veigel, S., Keckes, J., Yano, H., Abe, K., Nogi, M., Nakagaito, A.N., Mangalam, A., Simonsen, J., Benight, A.S., Bismarck, A., Berglund, L.A., Peijs, T.: Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 1–33 (2010)
Eng, C.C., Ibrahim, N.A., Zainuddin, N., Ariffin, H., Yunus, W.M.Z.W., Then, Y.Y.: Enhancement of Mechanical and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Hydrophilic Nanoclay Reinforced Polylactic Acid/Polycaprolactone/Oil Palm Mesocarp Fiber Hybrid Composites (2014)
Fareed, M., Stamboulis, A.: Effect of nanoclay dispersion on the properties of a commercial glass ionomer cement. Int. J. Biomater. 2014, 685389 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/685389
Faruk, O., Matuana, L.: Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood-plastic composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2073–2077 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.004
Floody, M.C., Theng, B.K.G., Mora, M.L.: Natural nanoclays: applications and future trends—a Chilean perspective. Clay Miner. 44, 161–176 (2009). doi:10.1180/claymin.2009.044.2.161
Galpaya, D.: Recent advances in fabrication and characterization of graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Graphene 01, 30–49 (2012). doi:10.4236/graphene.2012.12005
Gururaja, M.N., Hari Rao, A.N.: A review on recent applications and future prospectus of hybrid composites. Int. J. Soft. Comput. Eng. 1, 352–355 (2012)
Hakamy, A., Shaikh, F.U.A., Low, I.M.: Thermal and mechanical properties of hemp fabric-reinforced nanoclay–cement nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 1684–1694 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10853-013-7853-0
Han, G., Lei, Y., Wu, Q., Kojima, Y., Suzuki, S.: Bamboo-fiber filled high density polyethylene composites: effect of coupling treatment and nanoclay. J. Polym. Environ. 16, 123–130 (2008). doi:10.1007/s10924-008-0094-7
Haq, M., Burgueño, R., Mohanty, A.K., Misra, M.: Hybrid bio-based composites from blends of unsaturated polyester and soybean oil reinforced with nanoclay and natural fibers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 3344–3351 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.007
Henrique, P., Camargo, C., Satyanarayana, K.G., Wypych, F.: Nanocomposites: synthesis, structure, properties and new application opportunities. Mater. Res. 12, 1–39 (2009). doi:10.1590/S1516-14392009000100002
Hossen, M.F., Hamdan, S., Rahman, M.R., Rahman, M.M., Liew, F.K., Lai, J.C.: Effect of fiber treatment and nanoclay on the tensile properties of jute fiber reinforced polyethylene/clay nanocomposites. Fibers Polym. 16, 479–485 (2015). doi:10.1007/s12221-015-0479-x
Huang, X., Netravali, A.: Characterization of flax fiber reinforced soy protein resin based green composites modified with nano-clay particles. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 2005–2014 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.007
Ibeh, C.C., Bubacz, M.: Current trends in nanocomposite foams. J. Cell. Plast. 44, 493–515 (2008). doi:10.1177/0021955X08097707
Islam, M.S., Ahmad, M.B., Hasan, M., Aziz, S.A., Jawaid, M., Haafiz, M.K.M., Zakaria, S.A.H.: Natural fiber-reinforced hybrid polymer nanocomposites: effect of fiber mixing and nanoclay on physical, mechanical, and biodegradable properties. BioResources 10, 1394–1407 (2015)
Jahanmardi, R., Kangarlou, B., Dibazar, A.: Effects of organically modified nanoclay on cellular morphology, tensile properties, and dimensional stability of flexible polyurethane foams. J. Nanostructure Chem. 3, 82 (2013). doi:10.1186/2193-8865-3-82
Kamble, R., Ghag, M., Gaikawad, S., Panda, B.K.: Halloysite nanotubes and applications : a review. J. Adv. Sci. Res. 3, 25–29 (2012)
Karger-Kocsis, J., Mahmood, H., Pegoretti, A.: Recent advances in fiber/matrix interphase engineering for polymer composites. Prog. Mater Sci. 73, 1–43 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.003
Kausar, A.: Processing and properties of poly(ester-urethane)/modified montmorillonite nanocomposite foams derived from novel diol and tolylene-2,4-diisocyanate. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. (2015). doi:10.1177/0892705715610401
Kojima, Y., Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Akane Okada, A., Fukushima, Y., Kurauchi, T., Kamigaito, O.: Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. J. Mater. Res. 8, 1185–1189 (2011). doi:10.1557/JMR.1993.1185
Kord, B., Kiakojouri, S.M.H.: Effect of nanoclay dispersion on physical and mechanical properties of wood flour/polypropylene/glass fibre hybrid composites. BioResources 6, 1741–1751 (2011)
Kuilla, T., Bhadra, S., Yao, D., Kim, N.H., Bose, S., Lee, J.H.: Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 35, 1350–1375 (2010)
Kumar, R., Yakabu, M.K., Anandjiwala, R.D.: Effect of montmorillonite clay on flax fabric reinforced poly lactic acid composites with amphiphilic additives. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 41, 1620–1627 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.012
Kushwaha, P.K., Kumar, R.: Reinforcing effect of nanoclay in bamboo-reinforced thermosetting resin composites. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 50, 127–135 (2011). doi:10.1080/03602559.2010.512350
Lee, Y.H., Kuboki, T., Park, C.B., Sain, M., Kontopoulou, M.: The effects of clay dispersion on the mechanical, physical, and flame-retarding properties of wood fiber/polyethylene/clay nanocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 118, 452–461 (2010). doi:10.1002/app.32045
Li, B., Zhang, X., Gao, J., Song, Z., Qi, G., Liu, Y., Qiao, J.: Epoxy based nanocomposites with fully exfoliated unmodified clay: mechanical and thermal properties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 5864–5868 (2010a). doi:10.1166/jnn.2010.2500
Li, P., Kim, N.H., Bhadra, S., Lee, J.H.: Electroresponsive property of novel poly(acrylate-acryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride)/clay nanocomposite hydrogels. Adv. Mater. Res. 79–82, 2263–2266 (2009a). doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.79-82.2263
Li, P., Kim, N.H., Hui, D., Rhee, K.Y., Lee, J.H.: Improved mechanical and swelling behavior of the composite hydrogels prepared by ionic monomer and acid-activated Laponite. Appl. Clay Sci. 46, 414–417 (2009b). doi:10.1016/j.clay.2009.10.007
Li, S., Lin, M.M., Toprak, M.S., Kim, D.K., Muhammed, M.: Nanocomposites of polymer and inorganic nanoparticles for optical and magnetic applications. Nano Rev 1, 1–19 (2010b). doi:10.3402/nano.v1i0.5214
Li, X., Nikiforow, I., Pohl, K., Adams, J., Johannsmann, D.: Polyurethane coatings reinforced by halloysite nanotubes. Coatings 3, 16–25 (2013). doi:10.3390/coatings3010016
Liu, M., Jia, Z., Jia, D., Zhou, C.: Recent advance in research on halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposite. Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 1498–1525 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.04.004
Liu, Z., Erhan, S.Z., Calvert, P.D.: Solid freeform fabrication of soybean oil-based composites reinforced with clay and fibers. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 81, 605–610 (2004). doi:10.1007/s11746-006-0949-9
Marney, D.C.O., Russell, L.J., Wu, D.Y., Nguyen, T., Cramm, D., Rigopoulos, N., Wright, N., Greaves, M.: The suitability of halloysite nanotubes as a fire retardant for nylon 6. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 93, 1971–1978 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.06.018
Marquis, D,M., Guillaume, É., Chivas-Joly, C.: Properties of nanofillers in polymer. In: Cuppoletti, J. (ed.) Nanocomposites and Polymers with Analytical Methods, pp. 261–284. Intech Publishing (2011)
Matsuda, D.K.M., Verceheze, A.E.S., Carvalho, G.M., Yamashita, F., Mali, S.: Baked foams of cassava starch and organically modified nanoclays. Ind. Crops Prod. 44, 705–711 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.032
Mittal, V.: Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites: a review. Materials (Basel) 2, 992–1057 (2009). doi:10.3390/ma2030992
Mohan, T.P., Kanny, K.: Water barrier properties of nanoclay filled sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 42, 385–393 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.010
Montes, C., Joshi, A., Salehi, S., Lvov, Y., Allouche, E.: In: Sobolev, K., Shah, S.P. (eds.) Nanotechnology in Construction. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2015)
Morsy, M.S., Alsayed, S.H., Aqel, M.: Hybrid effect of carbon nanotube and nano-clay on physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 145–149 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.046
Nabil, F.L., Zaidon, A., Jawaid, M., Anwar, U.K.M., Bakar, E.S., Paridah, M.T., Ridzuan, S.M.A., Aizat, G.M.: Physical and morphological properties of nanoclay in low molecular weight phenol formaldehyde resin by ultrasonication. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 62, 124–129 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.07.012
Najafi, A., Kord, B., Abdi, A., Ranaee, S.: The impact of the nature of nanoclay on physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene/reed flour nanocomposites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. 25, 717–727 (2012). doi:10.1177/0892705711412813
Nakato, T., Miyamoto, N.: Liquid crystalline behavior and related properties of colloidal systems of inorganic oxide nanosheets. Materials (Basel) 2, 1734–1761 (2009). doi:10.3390/ma2041734
Nieddu, E., Mazzucco, L., Gentile, P., et al.: Preparation and biodegradation of clay composites of PLA. React. Funct. Polym. 69, 371–379 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2009.03.002
Nourbakhsh, A., Ashori, A.: Influence of nanoclay and coupling agent on the physical and mechanical properties of polypropylene/bagasse nanocomposite. Polymer (Guildf) 112, 1386–1390 (2009). doi:10.1002/app
Özcan, A.S., Erdem, B., Özcan, A.: Adsorption of acid blue 193 from aqueous solutions onto Na-bentonite and DTMA-bentonite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 280, 44–54 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.035
Patel, R.H., Patel, K.S.: Synthesis of flame retardant polyester-urethanes and their applications in nanoclay composites and coatings. Polym. Int. 63, 529–536 (2014). doi:10.1002/pi.4547
Paul, D.R., Robeson, L.M.: Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 49, 3187–3204 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017
Pavlidou, S., Papaspyrides, C.D.: A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33, 1119–1198 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008
Pojanavaraphan, T., Schiraldi, D.A., Magaraphan, R.: Mechanical, rheological, and swelling behavior of natural rubber/montmorillonite aerogels prepared by freeze-drying. Appl, Clay Sci. 50, 271–279 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.clay.2010.08.020
Pollet, E., Delcourt, C., Alexandre, M., Dubois, P.: Organic-inorganic nanohybrids obtained by sequential copolymerization of ε-caprolactone and L, L-lactide from activated clay surface. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 2235–2244 (2004). doi:10.1002/macp.200400180
Potts, J.R., Dreyer, D.R., Bielawski, C.W., Ruoff, R.S.: Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 52, 5–25 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042
Prabhu, P., Jawahar, P., Balasubramanian, M., Mohan, T.P.: Machinability study of hybrid nanoclay-glass fibre reinforced polyester composites. Int. J. Polym. Sci. (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/416483
Prasad, A.V.R., Rao, K.B., Rao, K.M., Ramanaiah, K., Gudapati, S.P.K.: Influence of nanoclay on the mechanical performance of wild cane grass fiber-reinforced polyester nanocomposites. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 20, 541–556 (2015). doi:10.1080/1023666X.2015.1053335
Prasanth, R., Shubha, N., Hng, H.H., Srinivasan, M.: Effect of nano-clay on ionic conductivity and electrochemical properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) based nanocomposite porous polymer membranes and their application as polymer electrolyte in lithium ion batteries. Eur. Polym. J. 49, 307–318 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.10.033
Raghavan, P., Lim, D.-H., Ahn, J.-H., Nah, C., Sherrington, D.C., Ryu, H.-S., Ahn, H.J.: Electrospun polymer nanofibers: the booming cutting edge technology. React. Funct. Polym. 72, 915–930 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.08.018
Rahman, N.A., Hassan, A., Yahya, R., Lafia-Araga, R.A.: Glass fiber and nano-clay reinforced polypropylene composites: morphological, thermal and mechanical properties. Sains Malasyana 42, 537–546 (2013)
Rajini, N., Jappes, J.T.W., Jeyaraj, P., Rajakarunakaran, S., Bennet, C.: Effect of montmorillonite nanoclay on temperature dependence mechanical properties of naturally woven coconut sheath/polyester composite. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 32, 811–822 (2013). doi:10.1177/0731684413475721
Raman, N., Sudharsan, S., Pothiraj, K.: Synthesis and structural reactivity of inorganic-organic hybrid nanocomposites—a review. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 16, 339–352 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2011.01.012
Rawtani, D., Agrawal, Y.K.: Multifarious applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 30, 282–295 (2012)
Ray, S.S., Okamoto, M.: Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1539–1641 (2003)
Nafchi, H.R., Abdouss, M., Najafi, S.K., Gargari, R.M., Mazhar, M.: Effects of nano-clay particles and oxidized polypropylene polymers on improvement of the practical properties of wood-polypropylene composite. Adv. Compos. Mater 24, 239–248 (2015). doi:10.1080/09243046.2014.891341
Saba, N., Tahir, P., Jawaid, M.: A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites. Polymers (Basel) 6, 2247–2273 (2014). doi:10.3390/polym6082247
Saba, N., Paridah, M.T., Abdan, K., Ibrahim, N.A.: Preparation and characterization of fire retardant nano-filler from oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers. Bio Resour. 10, 4530–4543 (2015a)
Saba, N., Jawaid, M., Hakeem, K.R., et al.: Potential of bioenergy production from industrial kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) based on Malaysian perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42, 446–459 (2015b)
Saba, N., Paridah, M.T., Jawaid, M.: Mechanical properties of Kenaf fibre reinforced polymer composite: a review. Constr. Build. Mater. 76, 87–96 (2015c)
Sandler, J.K.W., Pegel, S., Cadek, M., Gojny, F., van Es, M., Lohmar, J., Blau, W.J., Schulte, K., Windle, A.H., Shaffer, M.S.P., et al.: A comparative study of melt spun polyamide-12 fibres reinforced with carbon nanotubes and nanofibres. Polymer (Guildf) 45, 2001–2015 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.023
Sedaghat, S.: Synthesis of clay-CNTs nanocomposite. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 3, 3–6 (2013)
Shalwan, A., Yousif, B.F.: Influence of date palm fibre and graphite filler on mechanical and wear characteristics of epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 59, 264–273 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.066
Shirini, F., Mamaghani, M., Atghia, S.V.: Sulfonic acid functionalized ordered nanoporous Na+-Montmorillonite (SANM) as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for the chemoselective methoxymethylation of alcohols. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 3, 1–5 (2012). doi:10.1186/2193-8865-3-2
Singh, A.P., Sharma, M., Singh, I.: A review of modeling and control during drilling of fiber reinforced plastic composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 47, 118–125 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.038
Sothornvit, R., Rhim, J.W., Hong, S.I.: Effect of nano-clay type on the physical and antimicrobial properties of whey protein isolate/clay composite films. J. Food Eng. 91, 468–473 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.026
Srasra, E., Bergaya, F., Fripiat, J.J.: Infrared spectroscopy study of tetrahedral and octahedral substitutions in an interstratified illite-smectite clay. Clays Clay Miner. F Full J. Title Clays Clay Miner. 42, 237–241 (1994). doi:10.1346/CCMN.1994.0420301
Subramaniyan, A.K., Sun, C.T.: Interlaminar fracture behavior of nanoclay reinforced glass fiber composites. J. Compos. Mater. 42, 2111–2122 (2008). doi:10.1177/0021998308094550
Tabari, H.Z., Nourbakhsh, A., Ashori, A.: Effects of nanoclay and coupling agent on the physico-mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties of wood flour/polypropylene composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 51, 272–277 (2011). doi:10.1002/pen.21823
Teacǎ, C.A., Bodîrlǎu, R., Spiridon, I.: Effect of cellulose reinforcement on the properties of organic acid modified starch microparticles/plasticized starch bio-composite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 93, 307–315 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.020
Thakur, M.K., Gupta, R.K., Thakur, V.K.: Surface modification of cellulose using silane coupling agent. Carbohydr. Polym. 111, 849–855 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.041
Thakur, V.K., Thakur, M.K.: Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 109, 102–117 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.039
Thakur, V.K., Singha, A.S., Thakur, M.K.: Surface modification of natural polymers to impart low water absorbency. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 17, 133–143 (2012). doi:10.1080/1023666X.2012.640455
Thakur, V.K., Thakur, M.K., Gupta, R.K.: Graft copolymers from cellulose: synthesis, characterization and evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 97, 18–25 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.069
Turku, I., Kärki, T.: The effect of carbon fibers, glass fibers and nanoclay on wood flour-polypropylene composite properties. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 72, 73–79 (2014). doi:10.1007/s00107-013-0754-8
Uddin, F.: Studies in finishing effects of clay mineral in polymers and synthetic fibers. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 1–13 (2013). doi:10.1155/2013/243515
Uddin, F.: Clays, nanoclays, and montmorillonite minerals. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 2804–2814 (2008)
Ursache, O., Rodrigues, S.: Combined effects of dam removal and past sediment mining on a relatively large lowland sandy gravel bed river (Vienne River, France). EGU Gen. 16, 3870 (2014)
Valença, S.L., Griza, S., de Oliveira, V.G., Sussuchi, E.M., de Cunha, F.G.C.: Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of epoxy composite reinforced with Kevlar plain fabric and glass/Kevlar hybrid fabric. Compos. Part B Eng. 70, 1–8 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.040
Wei, J., Meyer, C.: Sisal fiber-reinforced cement composite with Portland cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and nanoclay. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 7604–7619 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8469-8
Wilson, M.J.: Clay mineralogical and related characteristics of geophagic materials. J. Chem. Ecol. 29, 1525–1547 (2003). doi:10.1023/A:1024262411676
Yan, L., Chouw, N., Jayaraman, K.: Flax fibre and its composites—a review. Compos. Part B Eng. 56, 296–317 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014
Yuan, P., Tan, D., Annabi-Bergaya, F.: Properties and applications of halloysite nanotubes: recent research advances and future prospects. Appl. Clay Sci. 112–113, 75–93 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.001
Yunsheng, Z., Wei, S., Zongjin, L., Xiangming, Z., Eddie, Chungkong C.: Impact properties of geopolymer based extrudates incorporated with fly ash and PVA short fiber. Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 370–383 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.006
Yusoh, K.B.: Mechanical and physical properties of wood-plastic composites made of polypropylene, wood flour and nanoclay. Proc. Int. Agric. Plant ISBN 978-9, 1–10 (2015)
Zahedi, M., Khanjanzadeh, H., Pirayesh, H., Saadatnia, M.A.: Utilization of natural montmorillonite modified with dimethyl, dehydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium salt as reinforcement in almond shell flour–polypropylene bio-nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 71, 143–151 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.009
Zhang, Y., Tang, A., Yang, H., Ouyang, J.: Applications and interfaces of halloysite nanocomposites. Appl. Clay Sci. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.034
Zotti, A., Borriello, A., Ricciardi, M., Antonucci, V., Giordano, M., Zarrelli, M.: Effects of sepiolite clay on degradation and fire behaviour of a bisphenol A-based epoxy. Compos. Part B 73, 139–148 (2015)
Acknowledgments
The first author acknowledges the International Graduate Research Fellowship (IGRF) UPM Malaysia grant to support this work. The authors also thankful to the Universiti Putra Malaysia for supporting this research study through Putra Grant Vot No. 9420700.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saba, N., Jawaid, M., Asim, M. (2016). Recent Advances in Nanoclay/Natural Fibers Hybrid Composites. In: Jawaid, M., Qaiss, A., Bouhfid, R. (eds) Nanoclay Reinforced Polymer Composites. Engineering Materials. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0950-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0950-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0949-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0950-1
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)