Abstract
The worldwide heavy use of veterinary pharmaceuticals in confined animal-feeding operations has resulted in annual discharge of 3,000–27,000 tons of drug chemicals via livestock manure into the environment. More than 50 major antibiotics have been detected in poultry, swine, cattle, and horse manures at 0.01–765 mg kg−1 dry manure mass. In animal manures, most veterinary pharmaceuticals degrade rapidly via biochemical reactions, demonstrating a half-life time 2–30 days. In soils, veterinary pharmaceuticals interact with soil minerals, organic matter, and organisms and are subject to sorption, photohydrolysis, oxidation, and biodegradation. The soil distribution coefficient (Kd) values of animal pharmaceuticals range from 0.3 to 6,300 L kg−1, varying with the chemical species and soil properties. The persistence of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils is influenced by soil type, organic matter content, pH, moisture content, and temperature. Though certain antibiotics such as roxithromycin, sarafloxacin, and virginiamycin are persistent, the vast majority of veterinary pharmaceuticals are degradable (half-life <30 days) in soils. The sorption, rapid degradation, and physical attenuation limit residual pharmaceuticals in the top 30-cm soil of agricultural land at generally less than 1 μg kg−1, posing little impacts on soil microorganisms, fauna, and plants. Nevertheless, veterinary pharmaceuticals could migrate from manured fields to water bodies via surface runoff and leaching. In North American drainage ditches and streams, up to 290 ng L−1 of animal antibiotics had been detected, although the concentrations were far below the no-observed-effect concentration levels of veterinary pharmaceuticals to aquatic organisms. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria have been identified in animal manures and livestock-handling workers, indicating the risk of antibiotic-resistant genes spread in association with veterinary pharmaceutical overuse and manure disposal. Future research should focus on developing standard composting protocols to eliminate residual veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic-resistant pathogens from animal manures and on cultivating animal-feeding methods alternative to drug administration.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
2.1 Introduction
Veterinary pharmaceuticals are chemical drugs administered to domestic animals to treat diseases, prevent infections, increase weight gain, or improve feed efficiency. Common veterinary pharmaceuticals include antibiotics, antiparasitics, anti-inflammatory medicines, anesthetics, pain relievers, and specialized products used to manage animal reproductive or metabolic conditions. These medications are prepared in a variety of forms such as pills, liquids, injections, or powders and can be applied to animals via feed or drinking water, by injection or skin insertion, or simply through drenching (OTA 1979).
The U.S. confined animal feeding operations rely heavily on veterinary pharmaceuticals to maintain healthy, productive livestock. Veterinary antibiotics are regular feed supplements of poultry, swine, cattle, equine, and aquaculture (Henderson and Coats 2010). Considering chemical structures, most veterinary pharmaceuticals are amphiphilic or amphoteric, ionizable organic compounds consisting of a nonpolar core and multiple polar functional groups (Thiele-Bruhn 2003). After imposed to livestock, these pharmaceuticals are typically absorbed through animals’ digestive and circulatory systems and discharged in waste from the excretory system. The pharmaceuticals are generally metabolized and deactivated for biological functions after the animal body passage. A significant portion (10–90 %) of the applied quantities, however, may remain intact as parent compounds and deposit in animal tissues and excrement (Kumar et al. 2005a). Certain metabolites are also biologically active (Halling-Sørensen et al. 1998). Residues of veterinary pharmaceuticals and their active metabolites in animal tissues and excreta have been exclusively detected (Kumar et al. 2005a; Furtula et al. 2010). Responding to the residual pharmaceuticals, microorganisms such as Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., and E. coli in animal manures may develop antibiotic resistance (Hayes et al. 2004; Furtula et al. 2010). Through land application of animal waste as an organic fertilizer, these residual veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms enter into soil and water and may influence aquatic ecosystem and accumulate in food crops (Solomon et al. 2010; Carlsson et al. 2013). To assess the potential risks posed by veterinary pharmaceuticals from land application of animal waste, the occurrence of animal drug compounds in animal manures and their fate and transport in agricultural ecosystems need to be addressed. This chapter is to summarize veterinary pharmaceutical uses in confined animal feeding operations, reports on presence and detection of residual veterinary medicines in manures, and review the environmental behaviors of pharmaceutical residues in agricultural soils.
2.2 Uses of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Animal Production
More than 400 active chemical ingredients have been manufactured into nearly 2,000 veterinary pharmaceutical products to treat various species of animals including pigs, cattle, horses, sheep, goats, birds, fish, deer, cats, and dogs (FDA 2012). These chemicals are conventionally placed into five groups: anthelmintics (dewormers), tranquilizers, antibiotics, hormones, and agonists. According to their functions, they can be further categorized as therapeutic medicines (to treat animals for preventing diseases, combating infections, or alleviating pain or injury. Examples include coccidiostatics, trimetoprim, and sulfamethizol) and growth promoters (to help with animal feed digestion and growth efficiency. Examples are tylosin, monensin, and virginiamycin) (Garrido Frenich et al. 2010).
More than 70 % of the consumed veterinary pharmaceuticals are antibiotics – chemicals that can inhibit the growth of other microorganisms even at extremely low concentrations (Halling-Sørensen et al. 1998). There are over 150 antibiotics in use today, of which more than 90 % are natural products of bacteria and fungi (molds) and semisynthetic modifications of natural compounds, and a few such as sulfonamides are completely synthetic (von Nussbaum et al. 2006). The first commercially manufactured antibiotic was penicillin, a chemical compound derived from Penicillium fungi. Antibiotics were initially and are continuously used for therapeutically treating human and animal diseases and infections. In 1949, the U.S. officially approved the use of antibiotics as a feed additive in the rearing of domestic animals for human consumption, so did the United Kingdom in 1953 (Witte 2000). Today, supplementing animal feed with antibiotics has been practiced in nearly all livestock and aquaculture operations in most countries. Antibiotics added in feed serve predominantly as growth promoters. It is believed that the antibiotics inhibit subclinical pathogenic bacterial infections, increase uptake and utilization of nutrients through the intestinal wall, and suppress the activity and population of bacteria in the intestines and thus, preserve the energy in feed that would be lost due to microbial fermentation, promoting animal growth through nutrient and energy availability enhancement (Gaskins et al. 2002). Registered animal antibiotics for use as growth promoter/feed efficiency in Australia, Denmark, European Union (EU), and Canada are well summarized in Sarmah et al. (2006). The antibiotics approved for use in U.S. food-producing animals are given in Table 2.1. Relative usage of these chemicals is illustrated in Fig. 2.1.
Addition of antibiotics to animal feed is recommended at dose ranging from 3 to 220 mg kg−1, depending on the species and growth stage of the animal and the type of antibiotics (McEwen and Fedorka‐Cray 2002). Multiple antibiotics are often supplemented in combination. Some antibiotics are added for a specific growth stage of animals but some could be fed continuously up to the point of slaughter (Kumar et al. 2005a). Furtula et al. (2009) reported that chicken feeds in British Columbia, Canada contained multiple antibiotics at concentrations varying with bird growth phases, typically 22 mg kg−1 virginiamycin, 99 mg kg−1 monensin, 120 mg kg−1 salinomycin, 80 mg kg−1 narasin, 80 mg kg−1 nicarbazin, 165 mg kg−1 bacitracin, and 22 mg kg−1 penicillin in empirical combinations. Currently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves 14 antibiotics for use in swine feed (Table 2.1), of which 11 are recommended as growth promoters at 2–150 mg kg−1 of feed (Holt 2008). Due to the development of bacterial antibiotic resistance, however, animal feeds often contain antibiotics at contents higher than the recommended levels. A survey revealed that 25 % of the 3,000 tested swine feeds in the U.S. contained antibiotics at higher-than-the-recommended concentrations (Dewey et al. 1997). The widespread use of antibiotics at increasing rates may facilitate the evolution of bacteria toward antibiotics-resistant strains and consequently, induce new, untreatable livestock diseases (Kumar et al. 2005a). Antibiotics inhibit or destroy sensitive bacteria, providing an environment for those resistant variants to flourish and become dominant. The antibiotic resistance can be further transferred via plasmids to other bacteria.
Globally it is unclear what veterinary pharmaceuticals and in what quantities are being used, as data on the annual production and consumption of animal medicines are not readily available in many countries. The U.S. uses 13,067 tons of veterinary antibiotics in domestic animal agriculture and exports 1,632 tons to other countries annually (FDA 2010). In China, more than 6,000 tons of veterinary antibiotics are consumed annually (Zhao et al. 2010); the most common antibiotics are tetracyclines, sulfonamides, tylosin, and fluoroquinolones (Li et al. 2013). In the United Kingdom, 897 tons of antibiotics were applied to animal production in 2000 (Thiele-Bruhn and Aust 2004). The annual EU consumption of veterinary antibiotics was approximately 5,000 tons by 2005 (Kumar et al. 2005a). Since 2006, the use of antibiotics as a feed supplement of food-producing animals has been banned in EU countries (Europa 2005).
2.3 Residual Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Animal Manures
The use of veterinary pharmaceuticals is vitally important in confined food animal production. Nevertheless, animals do not utilize all the applied pharmaceuticals. Depending on the chemical and the animal species, 10–90 % of the feed-supplemented pharmaceuticals are excreted in animal urine and feces as intact parent compounds or bioactive metabolites (Kumar et al. 2005a). Through controlled-feeding trials with broilers eating antibiotics-supplemented feeds for 36 days, Kumar et al. (2004) found that 3–60 % of the antibiotics penicillin, salinomycin, bacitracin, chlortetracycline, virginiamycin I, virginiamycin II, monensin, and narasin added separately or in combination at 2–110 mg kg−1 in feed were excreted in bird manure. With the advances of analytical techniques, antibiotics such as tetracyclines, tylosin, monensin, sulfadimidine, and sulfathiazole have been detected in swine slurry, cattle manure, poultry litter, and fish farm sediment from different countries at a wide concentration range from trace to 200 mg kg−1 or mg L−1 (Kumar et al. 2005a). Literature reported concentrations of residual veterinary pharmaceuticals in manure wastes from confined food-producing animals are summarized in Table 2.2.
Detection of residual veterinary pharmaceuticals in manures is typically achieved by extracting animal waste with nonpolar and polar solvent extractants, purifying and concentrating the extracts using solid phase extraction (SPE) columns, and determining the processed extracts for concentrations of target chemicals using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques, with chemical standards for calibration. Due to low extraction efficiency and poor recovery of pharmaceuticals from background-complex waste media, accurate measurement of residual veterinary drugs in animal waste is always challenging. Extractants consisting of weakly acidic buffers and organic solvents (e.g., 1:1 methanol: pH 4.0 EDTA-McIlvaine buffer) are recommended to recover residual antibiotics from lyophilized manure materials (Thiele-Bruhn 2003). For certain veterinary chemicals, other formulated extractants (e.g., deionized water, a methanol-water mixture, or pure methanol) may be more efficient (Michelini et al. 2012). Methods such as repeated extraction, accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), ultrasonic liquid extraction, and Soxhlet extraction are commonly used to improve the extraction efficiency. Experiments with artificial antibiotic spiking disclosed 64–107 % efficiency of extracting pharmaceutical from manures (Furtula et al. 2009; Li et al. 2013). As instantaneous chemical spiking does not incorporate the “aging effect” of antibiotic-manure matrix interactions (i.e., chemicals being more tightly sorbed in the media and over time becoming more difficult to extract), the measured recovery rates may have over-estimated the actual extraction efficiency from genuine samples.
Most veterinary pharmaceuticals are biodegradable and therefore, storage or composting of animal manure helps eliminate the residual chemicals (Dolliver et al. 2008). De Liguoro et al. (2003) reported that the concentrations of oxytetracycline and tylosin in cattle manure decreased from 366.8 to 2.1 mg kg−1 and from 32.8 to <0.1 mg kg−1, respectively, after heaping the waste outdoor for 135 days. Degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals in animal manures is chiefly a result of microbial activity. As a result, manure sterilization significantly inhibited degradation of the residual veterinary chemicals (Wang et al. 2006). Degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals in animal manures by the inherent microorganisms poses challenges for accurately measuring the residual level of animal drugs in excreta. Meanwhile it suggests an effective approach for reducing bioactive chemical contamination simply by stockpiling or composting animal waste for adequate time (e.g., 2–3 months) prior to land disposal.
2.4 Environmental Behaviors of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Soils
Veterinary pharmaceuticals are introduced into the environment through discharge, handling, storage, and disposal of animal waste. Antibiotics in excreta from grazing livestock and in water of aquaculture ponds reach the environment by direct discharge. Collected manures (in storage sheds, slurry tanks, and lagoons) and processed products (e.g., compost, sewage sludge) are commonly applied via spreading, injection, or irrigation to cropland as an organic fertilizer. In the U.S., the food animal industry generates annually 8.5 million dry tons of swine manure, 16.2 million dry tons of poultry litter, and 107.4 million dry tons of cattle waste, of which the vast majority is disposed of through land application (Kumar et al. 2005a). If assume 50 % (in the range of 10–90 %) of the 13,067 tons of veterinary antibiotics consumed annually (FDA 2010) are excreted in animal waste, there were more than 6,500 tons of drug chemicals entering the U.S. soil and water environments.
Anticipated transport and exposure pathways of animal waste-derived veterinary pharmaceuticals are outlined in Fig. 2.2. In soil, veterinary pharmaceuticals may be adsorbed by soil solids, degraded by soil microorganisms, taken up by plants, transport to surface water via runoff and to groundwater via leaching, and generate adverse impacts on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
2.4.1 Sorption of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Soils
In soils, veterinary pharmaceuticals interact with clay minerals and organic matter, resulting in sorption, binding, and fixation of the chemicals in the soil matrix. The strength of the interaction is dependent on the chemical species and the soil property and is influenced by temperature, moisture, and the soil solution chemistry (Kumar et al. 2005a). A parameter “distribution (partition) coefficient” Kd (the ratio of the quantity of an adsorbate sorbed per unit mass of sorbent solid to the amount of the adsorbate remaining in solution at equilibrium; normally predicted from the linear portion of the adsorption isotherms) is commonly used to measure the sorption of a solute to soil. It is believed that sorption of organic contaminants in soil is mainly via interactions with soil organic matter (SOM) and thus, the adsorption coefficient KOC (Kd normalized by soil organic carbon (OC) content fOC: KOC = Kd/fOC) also serves as a measure of sorption (Kishi et al. 1990). Veterinary chemicals with increased aromaticity and electropolarity demonstrate higher Kd and KOC values and tend to be strongly bound to soils (Thiele-Bruhn et al. 2004). The Kd and KOC values of selected veterinary pharmaceuticals are given in Table 2.3.
Sorption of veterinary pharmaceuticals to soil constituents occurs naturally and ubiquitously, especially for those with high Kd or KOC values (Table 2.3). The sorption is generally rapid: in antibiotics-spiked (400–12,000 mg kg−1) soil slurry systems under agitation, more than 95 % of the chlortetracycline adsorption to a sandy loam and a clay soil occurred within 10 min and 95 % of the tylosin adsorption occurred within 3 h (Allaire et al. 2006). Soil active sorption sites include SOM and the broken edges, basal planes, and interlayer space of clay minerals (Nowara et al. 1997). For compounds with significant hydrophobic moieties (i.e., compounds with high octanol/water partition coefficients), sorption to soil is mainly via hydrophobic partitioning into SOM. Gruber et al. (1990) found that sorption of avermectin B1a to three different textured soils increased as the SOM increased and the Kd showed an evidently positive relationship with fOC, suggesting predominance of hydrophobic partitioning in this particular antibiotic sorption. By studying migration of carbamazepine, naproxen and diclofenac in field soil profiles with artificial irrigation, Chefetz et al. (2008) concluded that sorption of the pharmaceuticals to soil was governed by SOM in its quantity and physiochemical nature. For hydrophilic, ionizable antibiotics, however, hydrophobic partitioning may not be dominant. Instead, physiochemical interactions with soil minerals become more important. A review by Tolls (2001) noticed that the Kd values of animal antibiotics varied greatly with soil types, but translation to KOC by normalizing the values with soil fOC did not significantly decrease the variation, suggesting clay minerals were also important in binding veterinary pharmaceuticals. The binding mechanisms include van der Walls interaction, electrostatic attraction, cation bridging, and anion exchange. Studies showed that sorption of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, oxolinic acid, and enrofloxacin to pure clay minerals and sediments increased with increasing the sorbent surface area (Sithole and Guy 1987; Nowara et al. 1997), indicating a surface-related process of antibiotics to soil. Many pharmaceuticals contain functional groups such as amines, carboxyls, and hydroxyls (Table 2.1). Protonation or deprotonation of these groups in pH-specific media engenders positive or negative charges. Positively-charged antibiotics bind to soil particles through electrostatic attraction/cation exchange (Gao and Pedersen 2005; Wang et al. 2012). Anionic pharmaceutical molecules form complexes with cations that are adsorbed on negatively charged soil constituents; the cation bridging enables the pharmaceuticals to be retained in soils (Tolls 2001). In alkaline solutions, some antibiotics can even form complexes with clay minerals through anion exchange whereby the carboxylic groups of the chemicals directly replace the hydroxyl groups on mineral surfaces. This type of sorption is so strong that a phosphate solution is required to extract the sorbed antibiotics (Sassman and Lee 2007).
Furthermore, sorption of antibiotics to soil minerals is affected by the media pH, ionic strength, and types of exchangeable cations (Pils and Laird 2007; Wang et al. 2012). The media pH influences drug-soil interactions by altering the charges of pharmaceuticals and the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soils. For example, at pH 5.0 oxytetracycline has zero charges and interacts with organic matter mainly via hydrophobic partitioning; at lower and higher pH, the chemical becomes positively and negatively charged, respectively, and was sorbed to soil minerals mainly via cation exchange and cation bridging, respectively (Kulshrestha et al. 2004). Sassman and Lee (2005, 2007) noticed that the CEC-normalized sorption of tetracyclines and the fOC-normalized sorption of monensin and lasalocid to soils decreased with increasing soil pH in the range of 4.2–7.5. Wang et al. (2008) observed that the presence of Cu2+ enhanced sorption of tetracycline to montmorillonite in a wide pH range. Similar to clay minerals, SOM contains various functional groups and is typically negatively charged. Polar pharmaceutical compounds are also sorbed to soil through interactions with SOM via van der Waals force, electric attraction, cation bridging, and anion exchange (MacKay and Canterbury 2005; Gu et al. 2007; Sibley and Pedersen 2008). Agricultural soils are typically low in OC content (i.e., fOC <3 %) and therefore, these types of interaction may not be as contributing as with soil minerals.
Considering that most veterinary pharmaceuticals consist of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties (Table 2.1), it can be concluded that sorption of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils is a result of interactions of the chemicals with soil clay minerals and SOM chiefly through hydrophobic partitioning, electric attraction, and cation bridging. The interactions are determined by the physiochemical nature of the pharmaceuticals and the soils (e.g., the quantity and the type of soil clay and SOM) and are impacted by the soil solution chemistry. As such, Jones et al. (2005) identified soil texture, CEC, and iron oxide content as the most important factors that determined the Kd values of oxytetracycline in 26 OC < 4 % soils. Sorption of sulfamethazines in five different mineral soils was influenced by soil OC content, soil surface area, and soil solution pH (Lertpaitoonpan et al. 2009).
2.4.2 Transport of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Soil
Once in soil through land application of animal waste, residual veterinary pharmaceuticals can be transported from the manure‐applied fields to groundwater through percolation (leaching) and to surface waters through runoff. The chemicals weakly bound to soil materials (small Kd, Table 2.3) are likely to migrate out of the field in runoff water or be leached down in the soil profile by percolation water, whereas those strongly sorbed by soil solids (high Kd, Table 2.3) can move to other locations together with associated soil particles eroded by runoff water (Davis et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2011). The mobility of antibiotic chemicals in soils is controlled by their sorptivity and life time and influenced by soil solution pH and ionic strength (Rabølle and Spliid 2000; Blackwell et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2011). Furthermore, sorptive veterinary pharmaceuticals can form associations with colloids and dissolved organic matter (DOM) and migrate readily in the soil profile through preferential flow channels (Zitnick et al. 2011; Ding et al. 2013; Zou and Zheng 2013).
To reduce runoff losses of veterinary chemicals, immediate soil incorporation of land applied animal waste becomes important (Boxall 2008). Runoff losses of antibiotics (e.g., sulfonamides) could be one to two orders of magnitude higher from grassland than from cultivated land receiving surface application of manure slurry (Kreuzig et al. 2005). Moreover, surface applied manure can significantly increase the amount of runoff water from the treated field, likely due to the surface sealing effect of manure particulates (Burkhardt et al. 2005). Surface runoff of veterinary pharmaceuticals from animal waste has spread the chemicals to the general water environment. Lissemore et al. (2006) surveyed seven tributaries of an agricultural watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada for occurrence of veterinary pharmaceuticals in surface water and detected 14 antibiotics in 125 stream samples, with prevalence of lincomycin, monensin, carbamazepine, and sulfamethazine at median concentrations by 44 ng L−1. In Lansing (Michigan, USA) where animal manures from confined livestock feeding operations were extensively applied to cropland, antibiotics were detected in waters from 11 farm drainage tile channels and surface ditches, with amprolium by 288 ng L−1 and monensin by 189 ng L−1 at approximately 50 % detection frequency of 109 samples (Song et al. 2010).
2.4.3 Transformation of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Soils
In agricultural soils, residual veterinary pharmaceuticals introduced by land application of animal manure are subject to abiotic and biotic transformation and degradation. The degradability and degradation pathways vary significantly with veterinary chemicals and the transformation rate is influenced by a number of environmental factors including soil type, soil conditions (temperature, moisture, and oxygen status), manure type, soil-manure ratio, pH, and light (Boxall 2008; Lin and Gan 2011). Reported studies on degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils are summarized in Table 2.4.
Under general conditions, most animal antibiotics are degradable in soil, especially in the presence of manure waste, with a half-life time <30 days. Certain antibiotics such as roxithromycin, sarafloxacin, and virginiamycin, however, can be persistent and remain largely unchanged in soil over 120 days (Table 2.4). Degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils is a comprehensive result of microbial decomposition, organic transformation, oxidation, photolysis, and hydrolysis. Chee-Sanford et al. (2009) reviewed the possible degradation pathways of manure-introduced antibiotics in soil. As water is always present in animal waste and natural soils, hydrolysis may be an important mechanism for animal pharmaceuticals to dissipate in the environment. It is known that the antibiotics β-lactams, macrolides, and sulfonamides are susceptible to hydrolysis (Huang et al. 2001). Under mild acidic or basic conditions, penicillin G can be readily transformed to penicillinoic acid through hydrolysis (Huang et al. 2001):
If exposed to daylight, antibiotics may undergo photolysis at the soil-atmosphere interface. Quinolones and tetracyclines are particularly sensitive to photo irradiation (Doi and Stoskopf 2000). The photolysis reaction of tetracycline in water under light can be described as (Jiao et al. 2008):
Compared to other reactions, however, photodegradation of antibiotics may be minor under field conditions due to limited light exposure (Beausse 2004). Instead, biodegradation is the major pathway for antibiotics transformation in soil. Many veterinary chemicals are susceptible to enzymatic degradation reactions such as oxidative decarboxylation and hydroxylation (Al-Ahmad et al. 1999). Hydroxylation of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin initiated by the fungus G. striatum in a cultural solution lead to further biodegradation of the chemical to a number of metabolites (Fig. 2.3). Microbial addition by inoculating surface water with activated sewage sludge, recycled beef farm water, or lake sediments resulted in significantly accelerated degradation of the inherent veterinary antibiotics (Gartiser et al. 2007; Li et al. 2011), whereas microbial depletion by sterilizing agricultural soils greatly inhibited degradation of various antibiotic chemicals (Accinelli et al. 2007; Lin and Gan 2011).
In addition to biodegradation, chemical processes other than hydrolysis and photolysis are also important for antibiotic transformation in soil. Soil organic matter possesses a variety of functional groups such as amines, carboxyls, carbonyls, ethers, hydroxyls, nitriles, nitrosos, sulfides, and sulfonyls (Swift 1996) and is active in reacting with veterinary chemicals. Hu and Coats (2007) found that in autoclaved soils (OC 1.6 %), tylosin degraded rapidly and demonstrated a half-life of 8 days. Hydrolysis or photolysis could not explain the rapid degradation, as in irradiated water tylosin showed a half-life of 200 days. The same authors also noticed that tylosin degraded in nonsterilized soils at a rate nearly equal to that in the sterilized soils. This does not indicate that biodegradation of tylosin was insignificant. Likely, the spiked antibiotic at 50 mg kg−1 soil had inhibited the microbial activity, creating an equivalently sterile environment. The inhibitory effect of antibiotics on the resident microorganisms has been noticed (Gartiser et al. 2007).
Temperature influences degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils. Gavalchin and Katz (1994) spiked chlortetracycline and erythromycin to chicken feces-amended soils at 5.6 mg kg−1 and incubated the soils at different temperatures. After 30 days of 30, 20, and 4 °C incubation, 56 %, 12 %, and 0 % of the spiked chlortetracycline dissipated, respectively and for erythromycin, the levels were 100 %, 75 %, and 3 %, respectively. Li et al. (2011) observed that ceftiofur hydrolyzed to desfuroylceftiofur in deionized water, with a half-life time of 289 days at 15 °C. The half-life time was shortened to 96, 21, and 5 days, respectively, as the hydrolysis temperature increased to 25, 35, and 45 °C. Degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals is also influenced by soil oxygen availability. Dissipation of diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim from two mineral soils under anaerobic conditions was substantially slower than under aerobic conditions (Lin and Gan 2011). Sorption to soil minerals and SOM preserves veterinary antibiotics and enhances their persistence in soils (Zitnick et al. 2011). Smith et al. (1992) reported that microbial utilization of [14C] quinoline from solution was 30 times more rapid than from the bound on surfaces of suspended clay particles. A higher soil moisture content allows more chemicals in the solution phase, enhancing the accessibility to microorganisms. Wang et al. (2006) reported that the half-life time of sulfadimethoxine in a silt loam decreased from 10.4 days to 6.9 days and further to 4.9 days as the soil moisture content was elevated from 15 % to 20 % and additionally to 25 %, respectively. Degradation of veterinary pharmaceuticals is further influenced by soil pH. For example, the half-life time of virginiamycin in different agricultural soils ranged from 87 to 173 days and was negatively correlated to soil pH (Weerasinghe and Towner 1997). In neutral or alkaline solutions, tylosin hydrolyzed to tylosin aldol; at pH <4, however, the main hydrolysis product became desmycosin (Paesen et al. 1995). As organic matter and microorganisms promote antibiotic degradation, amendment of soil with more animal manure typically accelerate the dissipation of veterinary pharmaceuticals (Wang et al. 2006). Clearly, many environmental factors influence the stability and persistence of animal pharmaceuticals in soils and subsequently, affect their transport and potential ecological impacts in agricultural systems.
2.4.4 Uptake and Accumulation of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Crop Plants
In soil, residual veterinary pharmaceuticals can be absorbed by plants and accumulated in soil fauna. The uptake and accumulation, however, may vary with organism species and pharmaceutical compounds. Bioaccumulation of antibiotics by plants has been confirmed using in-vitro laboratory research. The plants millet (Panicum miliaceum), maize (Zea mays), and pea (Pisum sativum) grown in a culture medium containing 300 mg L−1 sulfadimethoxine for 8–18 days showed concentrations of the antibiotic ranging from 178 to 2,070 mg kg−1 in their roots and 12.5–110 mg kg−1 in their stalk/leaves (Migliore et al. 1995). In a greenhouse trial, barley (Hordeum distichum L.) grown in soils spiked with sulfadimethoxine at 109 mg kg−1 for 45 days accumulated the antibiotic 79.0 mg kg−1 in its roots and 18.2 mg kg−1 in its leaves (Migliore et al. 1996). Corn, cabbage, and green onion grown in swine manure-amended soil pots containing chlortetracycline and tylosin each at 0.58–1.58 mg kg−1 soil for 3–6 weeks accumulated chlortetracycline in plant tissues at 2–17 μg kg−1 fresh weight but not tylosin (Kumar et al. 2005b). Bioaccumulation of sulfamethazine by corn, lettuce, and potato from swine slurry-fertilized, 1.25–2.50 mg kg−1 sulfamethazine-fortified potting soils ranged from 0.1–1.2 mg kg−1 dry weight in above-ground plant tissues (Dolliver et al. 2007). Willow and maize grown in greenhouse potting soils spiked with 10 mg kg−1 sulfadiazine for 40 days showed presence of the chemical in the roots at 333 and 26.5 mg kg−1 dry weight, respectively, but not in the above-ground tissues (Michelini et al. 2012). Irrigation of soybean in greenhouse pots with water containing the pharmaceuticals carbamazepine, diphenhydramine, and fluoxetine each at 10 μg L−1 for 60–110 days resulted in accumulation of carbamazepine but not diphenhydramine and fluoxetine in plant roots and leaves at 1.9–3.4 μg kg−1 dry weight (Wu et al. 2010). As the concentrations of residual pharmaceuticals in agricultural soils receiving animal manures would be far lower compared with the levels tested in laboratory and greenhouse research, bioaccumulation of animal drugs in food crops, if there any, should be rather insignificant. So far it is not clear that bioaccumulation of veterinary chemicals in field crops poses health hazard to consumers of tainted plants.
2.4.5 Concentrations of Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Manured Agricultural Soils
A few studies reported on low concentrations of veterinary pharmaceuticals detected in soils of cropland repeatedly receiving animal manure applications. The top 30-cm soils collected from a crop field immediately after cattle manure application at 96 ton ha−1 demonstrated concentrations of oxytetracycline 6–7 μg kg−1 and tylosin below the detection limit (De Liguoro et al. 2003). Hamscher et al. (2002, 2005) determined residual antibiotics in agricultural fields with sandy soils that were fertilized annually with livestock manure slurry at 30–50 m3 ha−1 for many years in Northern Germany and detected 43–199 μg kg−1 tetracycline, 3.7–7.3 μg kg−1 chlortetracycline, but not any oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine, or tylosin in the top 30 cm soils. No antibiotics were present in deeper soils and only sulfamethazine was detected at 0.05–0.24 μg L−1 in groundwater 140 cm below the surface. In Lansing (Michigan, USA) MI where concentrated livestock feeding operations exist, 0.03–0.26 μg kg−1 amprolium and 0.004–0.50 μg kg−1 monensin were detected in the top 10-cm sandy loam soils of the agricultural land (Song et al. 2010). Due to attenuation and degradation, veterinary pharmaceuticals generally have rather low concentrations (e.g., <10 μg kg−1) and are mostly undetectable in soils of agricultural land receiving animal manure applications. So far contamination of food crops by plant absorption of the residual chemicals in manured agricultural soils has not been reported.
2.5 Ecological Impacts of Residual Veterinary Pharmaceuticals from Manures
Pharmaceutical antibiotics affect microorganisms even at low concentrations. The effects and effective doses vary with exposure time, microorganism species, and drug chemicals. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50, the effective concentration that causes toxicity to 50 % of the test population) of chlortetracycline is 2.2 mg L−1 for sewage sludge bacteria and that of tylosin is 54.7 mg L−1 (Halling-Sørensen 2001). The EC50 of monensin for soil respiration is 176 mg kg−1 (Thiele-Bruhn 2003). Nevertheless, species of soil fauna such as earthworms, springtails, and enchytraeid worms are not influenced by antibiotics even at concentrations >100 mg kg−1 (Bauger et al. 2000). The presence of chlotetracycline and oxytetracycline at 160 mg kg−1 in loamy soils stimulated the nutrient uptake and promoted the growth of radish, wheat, and corn, but had little influence on bean growth (Batchelder 1982). In a loamy soil containing 109 mg kg−1 sulfadimethoxine, the growth of barley was slightly inhibited (Migliore et al. 1996). Sulfadimethoxine at 300 mg L−1 in a culture solution also restricted the growth of roots, hypocotyls, and leaves of pea, corn, and millet (Migliore et al. 1995). The antibiotics oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline at 5.3 and 11.3 mg kg−1, respectively, in beef cattle feces applied to a sandy loam at 18.8 dry ton ha−1 enhanced soil respiration but did not influence the growth of corn seedlings (Patten et al. 1980). The fact is that land application of animal waste rarely results in residual antibiotics exceeding 0.2 mg kg−1 in agricultural soils. These results suggest that at environmentally relevant concentrations, residual veterinary pharmaceuticals in manure-fertilized soils will not adversely affect soil microorganisms, fauna, and plants.
Residual veterinary pharmaceuticals may be transported to surface waters from manure-applied cropland. In surface ditches and drainage tile channels surrounding the cropland that repeatedly receives animal manure, an array of antibiotics have been detected in the water. Streams in agricultural watersheds also show the trace presence of veterinary pharmaceuticals. Fourteen antibiotics have been detected at concentrations by 44 ng L−1 in seven tributaries of an agricultural watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada (Lissemore et al. 2006). A reconnaissance of 139 streams in the U.S. main continent detected 22 veterinary antibiotics in water at 0.014–0.10 μg L−1 (Kolpin et al. 2002). Laboratory studies indicate that aquatic plants are the non-target organisms most sensitive to antibiotic chemicals. Of the 25 tested antibiotics of different chemical classes, lomefloxacin, sulfamethoxine, and chlortetracycline are most phytotoxic to duckweed (Lemna gibba), with EC25 values of 38, 37, and 114 mg L−1, respectively (Brain et al. 2004). At low concentrations (e.g., 0.3–3 mg L−1) in water, antibiotics may enhance the growth of aquatic macrophytes (Solomon et al. 2010). In aquatic microcosm trials, effects of multiple antibiotics at concentrations below 0.22 μM were not observed on zooplankton, phytoplankton, and fishes (Richards et al. 2004; Wilson et al. 2004). The no-observed-effect concentrations of 15 tested veterinary pharmaceuticals in water to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were around 0.02 mg L−1 (Carlsson et al. 2013). This value of the parasiticide ivermectin to zooplankton was measured at 0.1 μg L−1 (Boonstra et al. 2011). These no-observed-effect concentrations, however, were 40–100 times higher than maximum environmentally-relevant concentrations. Adverse exposure to veterinary pharmaceuticals in natural waters, if there is any, would be arid and semi-arid headwater streams adjacent to concentrated, confined livestock feeding operations (Brooks et al. 2006).
There is great concern on development and spread of antimicrobial resistance through heavy use and dispersion of veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment. Common genes may mutate in the presence of antibiotics and resistance genes can transfer among diverse microorganisms. In animal intestinal guts live up to 1014 commensal bacteria of several hundred species (Andremont 2003). Antibiotic-resistant commensal bacteria may be selected every time when an antibiotic drug is administered. The bacteria are then excreted in animal feces and reach the environment through manure storage, handling, and disposal. In stored swine manure, 4–32 % of the bacteria, 71 % of the Enterococcus fecalis and 97 % of the E. coli were found resistant to at least one of the following antibiotics: tylosin, tetracycline, ampicillin, furatrizine, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, or sulfonamides (Haack and Andrews 2000; Cotta et al. 2003). These microorganisms survive the transition from manure storage lagoon into soil (Boes et al. 2005) and can be transported to surface water and groundwater via runoff and leaching processes (Unc and Goss 2003). Bacteria resistant to kanamycin and neomycin have been found in a coastal plain stream in South Carolina (Left et al. 1993). A strain of superbug methicillin-resistant bacteria Staphylococcus aureus associated with antibiotic-fed animals was detected in the noses of livestock-handling workers in North Carolina and Iowa (Harrison et al. 2013; Rinsky et al. 2013). Transport of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and transfer of antibiotic-resistant genes in the environment were well reviewed by Chee-Sanford et al. (2009). Through conjugation (transfer of DNA between a donor and a recipient cell), transduction (bacteriophage-mediated transfer of DNA between bacterial cells), and transformation (transporting exogenous DNA into the cell cytoplasm and integrating the DNA into the recipient genome), antibiotic-resistant genes can be spread between different microbial genera and species (Chee-Sanford et al. 2009). Once antibiotic-resistant pathogens become predominant, the original drugs turn to be ineffective in treating the related infections. Disastrous losses of health and economy may occur if alternative treatment methods are not available. Banning the use of antibiotics in animal feed should root up the risk. To the bottom line, anaerobic digestion or thermophilic composting of animal waste can dramatically reduce the population of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in manures (Sobsey et al. 2001; Cote et al. 2006).
2.6 Conclusion
The extensive use of veterinary pharmaceuticals, especially antibiotics as feed supplements in domestic animal production has resulted in significant discharge of the chemicals into the environment. In poultry, swine, and cattle manures, the residual contents of more than 50 major antibiotics were detected at 0.01–765 mg kg−1 dry manure mass. On average, 50 % (10–90 %) of the administrated veterinary pharmaceuticals were excreted as parent chemicals or bioactive metabolites in animal faeces and therefore, it was estimated that worldwide 3,000–27,000 tons of animal drugs entered into the natural ecosystem every year through manure disposal. In animal manures, pharmaceutical residues undergo microbial degradation and chemical transformation such as photolysis, hydrolysis, and decarboxylation. The half-lives of veterinary pharmaceuticals in animal manures ranged from less than 2 days to longer than 30 days. Composting or simply heaping for 60–90 days prior to manure land application is an effective way to eliminate the pharmaceutical residues. In soils, veterinary pharmaceuticals interact with soil minerals, organic matter, aqueous components, and organisms and are subject to sorption, photohydrolysis, oxidation, and biodegradation. Soil clay minerals and organic matter are both active agents for binding pharmaceuticals through a variety of mechanisms including van der Walls interaction, hydrophobic partitioning, electrostatic attraction, anion exchange, and cation bridging. However, the soil distribution coefficient (Kd) values of animal pharmaceuticals vary dramatically with the chemical species, from 0.3 to 6,300 L kg−1. The persistence of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils was influenced by a number of environmental factors such as soil type, organic matter content, pH, moisture content, and temperature. Most pharmaceuticals are degradable in soils, demonstrating a half-life <30 days; whereas certain antibiotics such as roxithromycin, sarafloxacin, and virginiamycin were persistent and might remain unchanged in soils over months. In soils repeatedly receiving livestock manures for years, up to 200 μg kg−1 of animal antibiotics were detected in the top 30-cm cultivation layer. Veterinary pharmaceuticals at such concentrations in soil would not impose discernible impacts on soil microorganisms, fauna, and plants, though plants and soil fauna could uptake and accumulate veterinary pharmaceuticals. So far contamination of food crops by residual pharmaceuticals in manured soils has not been reported. Even so, soil residual veterinary pharmaceuticals could diffuse from manured fields via surface runoff and deep percolation. Up to 290 ng L−1 of animal antibiotics were detected in drainage water from manure-fertilized cropland. In US and Canada, 22 animal antibiotics were detected in rivers and streams at up to 100 ng L−1, though a concentration lower than the no-observed-effect concentrations of veterinary pharmaceuticals to aquatic organisms. The standing concern associated with heavy use of animal pharmaceuticals is development of antimicrobial resistance and spread antibiotic-resistant bacteria through manure disposal. To eliminate the risk, reducing and eventually banning the use of antibiotics in animal feed should be enacted.
2.7 Outlook on Practical Applications
Eliminating residual veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic-resistant pathogens from livestock manure prior to land disposal of the waste is essential. Development of standard composting protocols and other effective methods for sterilizing animal manure should be a focus of future research. Composting is practical for on-farm operations and will also be able to eradicate animal-borne hormones. Prevention of pathogens from spreading from manure storage, handling, and composting facilities via runoff should be reinforced. Liquid from manure lagoons should be disinfected before environmental discharge. Since the long-term ecological impacts of veterinary pharmaceuticals at low concentrations in soil, water, and plants are largely unknown and are difficult to monitor, use of veterinary pharmaceuticals as feed additives should be gradually phased out. Research should advocate and assist in “sustainable, green animal-feed operations” by identifying alternative methods for enhancing animal health and growth.
References
Accinelli C, Koskinen WC, Becker JM, Sadowsky MJ (2007) Environmental fate of two sulfonamide antimicrobial agents in soil. J Agric Food Chem 55:2677–2682
Al-Ahmad A, Daschner FD, Kümmerer K (1999) Biodegradability of cefotiam, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, penicillin G, and sulfamethoxazole and inhibition of waste water bacteria. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 37:158–163
Allaire SE, Del Castillo J, Juneau V (2006) Sorption kinetics of chlortetracycline and tylosin on sandy loam and heavy clay soils. J Environ Qual 35:969–972
Andremont A (2003) Commensal flora may play key role in spreading antibiotic resistance. ASM News 69:601–607
Batchelder AR (1982) Chlorotetracycline and oxytetracycline effects on plant growth and development in soil systems. J Environ Qual 11:675–678
Bauger AJ, Jensen J, Krogh PH (2000) Effects of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin on soil fauna. Chemosphere 40:751–757
Beausse J (2004) Selected drugs in solid matrices: a review of environmental determination, occurrence and properties of principal substances. Trends Anal Chem 23:753–761
Blackwell PA, Kay P, Boxall ABA (2007) The dissipation and transport of veterinary antibiotics in a sandy loam soil. Chemosphere 67:292–299
Boes J, Alban L, Bagger J, Mongelmose V, Baggsen DL, Olsen JE (2005) Survival of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium in slurry applied to clay soil on a Danish swine farm. Prev Vet Med 69:213–228
Boonstra H, Reichman EP, van den Brink PJ (2011) Effects of the veterinary pharmaceutical ivermectin in indoor aquatic microcosms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 60:77–89
Boxall BAB (2008) Fate of veterinary medicines applied to soil. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: sources, fate, effects and risks. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 103–119
Brain RA, Johnson DJ, Richards SM, Sanderson H, Sibley PK, Solomon KR (2004) Effects of 25 pharmaceutical compounds to Lemna gibba using a 7-day static renewal test. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:371–382
Brooks BW, Riley TM, Taylor RD (2006) Water quality of effluent dominated stream ecosystems: ecotoxicological, hydrological, and management considerations. Hydrobiologia 556:365–379
Burkhardt M, Stamm C, Waul C, Singer H, Müller S (2005) Surface runoff and transport of sulfonamide antibiotics and tracers on manured grassland. J Environ Qual 34:1363–1371
Campagnolo ER, Hohnson KR, Karpari A et al (2002) Antimicrobial residues in animal water and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations. Sci Total Environ 299:89–95
Carballo EM, Barreiro CG, Scharf S, Gans O (2007) Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 148:570–579
Carlsson G, Patring J, Kreuger J, Norrgren L, Oskarsson A (2013) Toxicity of 15 veterinary pharmaceuticals in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Aquat Toxicol 126:30–41
Chee-Sanford JC, Mackie RI, Koike S et al (2009) Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J Environ Qual 38:1086–1108
Chefetz B, Mualem T, Ben-Ari J (2008) Sorption and mobility of pharmaceutical compounds in soil irrigated with reclaimed wastewater. Chemosphere 73:1335–1343
Chen H, Gao B, Li H, Ma LQ (2011) Effects of pH and ionic strength on sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin transport in saturated porous media. J Contam Hydrol 126:29–36
Cote C, Masse DI, Quessy S (2006) Reduction of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms by psychrophilic anaerobic digestion in swine slurries. Bioresour Technol 97:686–691
Cotta MA, Whitehead TR, Zeltwanger RL (2003) Isolation, characterization and comparison of bacteria from swine feces and manure storage pits. Environ Microbiol 5:737–745
Davis JG, Truman CC, Kim SC, Ascough JC, Carlson K (2006) Antibiotic transport via runoff and soil loss. J Environ Qual 35:2250–2260
De Liguoro M, Cibin V, Capolongo F et al (2003) Use of oxytetracycline and tylosin in intensive calf farming: evaluation of transfer to manure and soil. Chemosphere 52:203–212
Dewey CE, Cox BD, Straw BE, Budh EJ, Hurd HS (1997) Association between off‐label feed additives and farm size, veterinary consultant use, and animal age. Prev Vet Med 31:133–146
Ding Y, Teppen BJ, Boyd SA, Li H (2013) Measurement of associations of pharmaceuticals with dissolved humic substances using solid phase extraction. Chemosphere 91:314–319
Doi AM, Stoskopf MK (2000) The kinetics of oxytetracycline degradation in deionized water under varying temperature, pH, light, substrate, and organic matter. J Aquat Anim Health 12:246–253
Dolliver H, Kumar K, Gupta S (2007) Sulfamethazine uptake by plants from manure-amended soil. J Environ Qual 36:1224–1230
Dolliver H, Gupta S, Noll S (2008) Antibiotic degradation during manure composting. J Environ Qual 37:1245–1253
Donoho AL (1984) Biochemical studies on the fate of monensin in animals and in the environment. J Anim Sci 58:1528–1539
Europa (2005) Ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed enters into effect. Europa press release, December 22, 2005. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-05-1687_en.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2012
FDA (2010) 2009 summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville. www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/UCM231851.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013
FDA (2012) The Green Book – FDA approved products. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/animaldrugsatfda
Furtula V, Huang L, Chambers PA (2009) Determination of veterinary pharmaceuticals in poultry litter and soil by methanol extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Environ Sci Health B 44:717–723
Furtula V, Farrell EG, Diarrassouba F et al (2010) Veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in poultry litter from commercial farms and controlled feeding trials. Poult Sci 89:180–189
Gao J, Pedersen JA (2005) Adsorption of sulfonamide antimicrobial agents to clay minerals. Environ Sci Technol 39:9509–9516
Garrido Frenich A, Plaza-Bolanos P, Aguilera-Luiz MM, Martinez-Vidal JL (2010) Veterinary drugs and growth-promoting agent analyses. Nova Science, Hauppauge
Gartiser S, Urich E, Alexy R, Kümmerer K (2007) Ultimate biodegradation and elimination of antibiotics in inherent tests. Chemosphere 67:604–613
Gaskins HR, Collier CT, Anderson DB (2002) Antibiotics as growth promotants: mode of action. Anim Biotechnol 13:29–42
Gavalchin J, Katz SE (1994) The persistence of fecal‐borne antibiotics in soil. J AOAC Int 77:481–485
Gilbertson TJ, Hornish RE, Jaglan PS et al (1990) Environmental fate of ceftiofur sodium, a cephalosporin antibiotic. Role of animal excreta in its decomposition. J Agric Food Chem 38:890–894
Gruber VF, Halley BA, Hwang SC, Ku CC (1990) Mobility of avermectin B1a in soil. J Agric Food Chem 38:886–890
Gu C, Karthikeyan KG, Sibley SD, Pedersen JA (2007) Complexation of the antibiotic tetracycline with humic acid. Chemosphere 66:1494–1501
Haack BJ, Andrews RE (2000) Isolation of Tn916-like conjugal elements from swine lot effluent. Can J Microbiol 46:542–549
Haller MY, Müller SR, McArdell CS, Alder AC, Suter MJ (2002) Quantification of veterinary antibiotics (sulfonamides and trimethoprim) in animal manure by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 952:111–120
Halling-Sørensen B (2001) Inhibition of aerobic growth and nitrification of bacteria in sewage sludge by antibacterial agents. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:451–460
Halling-Sørensen B, Nors Nielsen S, Lanzky PF et al (1998) Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment – a review. Chemosphere 36:357–393
Hamscher G, Sczesny S, Höper H, Nau H (2002) Determination of persistent tetracycline residues in soil fertilized with liquid manure by high‐performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 74:1509–1518
Hamscher G, Pawelzick HT, Höper H, Nau H (2005) Different behavior of tetracyclines and sulfonamides in sandy soils after repeated fertilization with liquid manure. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:861–868
Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MTG et al (2013) Whole genome sequencing identifies zoonotic transmission of MRSA isolates with the novel mecA homologue mecC. EMBO Mol Med 5:509–515
Hayes JR, English LL, Carr LE, Wagner DD, Joseph SW (2004) Multiple-antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus spp. isolated from commercial poultry production environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6005–6011
Henderson KD, Coats JR (2010) Veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment: an introduction. In: Henderson KD, Coats JR (eds) Veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment, vol 1018, ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 3–7
Holt JP (2008) Growth performance and the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria in swine fed growth-promoting antimicrobials. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Hu D, Coats JR (2007) Aerobic degradation and photolysis of tylosin in water and soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:884–889
Huang CH, Renew JE, Smeby KL et al (2001) Assessment of potential antibiotic contaminants in water and preliminary occurrence analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting chemicals in water. Groundwater Association, Westerville, pp 46–57
Jiao S, Zheng S, Yin D, Wang L, Chen L (2008) Aqueous photolysis of tetracycline and toxicity of photolytic products to luminescent bacteria. Chemosphere 73:377–382
Jones AD, Bruland GL, Agrawal SG, Vasudevan D (2005) Factors influencing the sorption of oxytetracycline to soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:761–770
Karci A, Balcioglu IA (2009) Investigation of the tetracycline, sulfonamide, and fluoroquinolone antimicrobial compounds in animal manure and agricultural soils in Turkey. Sci Total Environ 407:4652–4664
Kim SC, Davis JG, Truman CC, Ascough Ii JC, Carlson K (2010) Simulated rainfall study for transport of veterinary antibiotics – mass balance analysis. J Hazard Mater 175:836–843
Kishi H, Kogure N, Hashimoto Y (1990) Contribution of soil constituents in adsorption coefficient of aromatic compounds, halogenated alicyclic and aromatic compounds to soil. Chemosphere 21:867–876
Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT et al (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211
Kreuzig R, Holtge S, Brunotte J et al (2005) Test-plot studies on runoff of sulfonamides from manured soils after sprinkler irrigation. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:777–781
Kulshrestha P, Giese RF, Aga DS (2004) Investigating the molecular interactions of oxytetracycline in clay and organic matter: insights on factors affecting its mobility in soil. Environ Sci Technol 38:4097–4105
Kumar K, Thompson A, Singh AK, Chander Y, Gupta SC (2004) Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for ultratrace determination of antibiotics in aqueous samples. J Environ Qual 33:250–256
Kumar K, Gupta SC, Baidoo SK, Chander Y, Rosen CJ (2005a) Antibiotic uptake by plants from soil fertilized with animal manure. J Environ Qual 34:2082–2085
Kumar K, Gupta SC, Chander Y, Singh AK (2005b) Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Adv Agron 87:1–54
Left LG, Dana JR, McArthur JV, Shimkets LJ (1993) Detection of Tn5-1ike sequences in Kanamycin-resistant stream bacteria and environmental DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:417–421
Lertpaitoonpan W, Ong SK, Moorman TB (2009) Effect of organic carbon and pH on soil sorption of sulfamethazine. Chemosphere 76:558–564
Li XL, Zheng W, Machesky ML, Yates SR, Katterhenry M (2011) Degradation kinetics and mechanism of antibiotic ceftiofur in recycled water derived from a beef farm. J Agric Food Chem 59:10176–10181
Li Y, Zhang X, Li W, Lu X, Liu B, Wang J (2013) The residues and environmental risks of multiple veterinary antibiotics in animal faeces. Environ Monit Assess 185:2211–2220
Lin K, Gan J (2011) Sorption and degradation of wastewater-associated non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics in soils. Chemosphere 83:240–246
Lissemore L, Hao C, Yang P et al (2006) An exposure assessment for selected pharmaceuticals within a watershed in southern Ontario. Chemosphere 64:717–729
MacKay AA, Canterbury B (2005) Oxytetracycline sorption to organic matter by metal-bridging. J Environ Qual 34:1964–1971
Marengo JR, Kok RA, O’Brien K et al (1997) Aerobic biodegradation of (14C)‐Sarafloxacin hydrochloride in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:462–471
McEwen SA, Fedorka‐Cray PJ (2002) Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect Dis 34:S93–S106
Michelini L, Reichel R, Werner W et al (2012) Sulfadiazine uptake and effects on Salix fragilis L. and Zea mays L. plants. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:5243–5257
Migliore L, Brambilla G, Cozzolina S, Gaudio L (1995) Effect on plants of sulphadimethoxine used in intensive farming (Panicum miliaceum, Pisumm sativum and Zea mays). Agric Ecosyst Environ 52:103–110
Migliore L, Brambilla G, Casoria P et al (1996) Effect of sulphadimethoxine contamination on barley (Hordeum distichum L., Poaceae, Liliopsida). Agric Ecosyst Environ 60:121–128
Nowara A, Burhenne J, Spiteller M (1997) Binding of fluoroquinolone carboxylic acid derivatives to clay minerals. J Agric Food Chem 45:1459–1463
OTA (1979) Drugs in livestock feed. NTIS order #PB-298450. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC
Paesen J, Cypers W, Busson R et al (1995) Isolation of decomposition products of tylosin using liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 699:99–106
Pan X, Qiang Z, Ben W, Chen M (2011) Residual veterinary antibiotics in swine manure from concentrated animal feeding operations in Shandong Province, China. Chemosphere 84:695–700
Patten DK, Wolf DC, Kunkle WE, Douglass LW (1980) Effects of antibiotics in beef cattle feces on nitrogen and carbon mineralization in soil and plant growth and composition. J Environ Qual 9:167–172
Pils JRV, Laird DA (2007) Sorption of tetracycline and chlortetracycline on K- and Ca-saturated soil clays, humic substances, and clay−humic complexes. Environ Sci Technol 41:1928–1933
Rabølle M, Spliid NH (2000) Sorption and mobility of metronidazole, olaquindox, oxytetracycline, and tylosin in soil. Chemosphere 40:715–722
Richards SM, Wilson CJ, Johnson DJ et al (2004) Effects of pharmaceutical mixtures in aquatic microcosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1035–1042
Rinsky JL, Naimpalli M, Wing S et al (2013) Livestock-associated methicillin and multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus is present among industrial, not antibiotic-free livestock operation workers in North Carolina. PLoS One 8(7):e67641. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067641
Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall ABA (2006) A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759
Sassman SA, Lee LS (2005) Sorption of three tetracyclines by several soils: assessing the role of pH and cation exchange. Environ Sci Technol 39:7452–7459
Sassman SA, Lee LS (2007) Sorption and degradation in soils of veterinary ionophore antibiotics: monensin and lasalocid. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1614–1621
Schlüsener MP, Bester K (2006) Persistence of antibiotics such as macrolides, tiamulin and salinomycin in soil. Environ Pollut 143:565–571
Sengeløv G, Halling‐Sørensen AB, Baloda SB et al (2003) Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ Int 28:587–595
Sibley SD, Pedersen JA (2008) Interaction of the macrolide antimicrobial clarithromycin with dissolved humic acid. Environ Sci Technol 42:422–428
Sithole BB, Guy RD (1987) Models for tetracycline in aquatic environments: I. Interaction with Bentonite clay systems. Water Air Soil Pollut 32:303–314
Smith SC, Ainsworth CC, Traina SJ, Hicks RJ (1992) Effect of sorption on the biodegradation of quinoline. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:737–746
Sobsey MD, Khatib LA, Hill MR et al (2001) Pathogens in animal wastes and the impacts of waste management practices on their survival, transport and fate. White Paper Summaries. www.cals.ncsu.edu/waste_mgt/natlcenter/whitepaperstimmaries/pathogens.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2012
Solomon KR, Hillis DG, Lissemore L, Sibley PK (2010) Risks of agricultural pharmaceuticals in surface water systems and soils. In: Henderson K et al (ed) Veterinary pharmaceuticals in the environment, ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 191–204
Song W, Ding Y, Chiou CT, Li H (2010) Selected veterinary pharmaceuticals in agricultural water and soil from land application of animal manure. J Environ Qual 39:1211–1217
Swift RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1011–1069
Thiele-Bruhn S (2003) Pharmaceutical antibiotic compounds in soils: a review. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:145–167
Thiele-Bruhn S, Aust MO (2004) Effects of pig slurry on the sorption of sulfonamide antibiotics in soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:31–39
Thiele-Bruhn S, Seibicke T, Schulten HR, Leinweber P (2004) Sorption of sulfonamide pharmaceutical antibiotics on whole soils and particle-size fractions. J Environ Qual 33:1331–1342
Tolls J (2001) Sorption of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils: a review. Environ Sci Technol 35:3397–3406
Unc A, Goss MJ (2003) Movement of fecal bacteria through the vadose zone. Water Air Soil Pollut 149:327–337
von Nussbaum F, Brands M, Hinzen B et al (2006) Medicinal chemistry of antibacterial natural products – exodus or revival? Angew Chem Int Ed 45:5072–5129
Wang Q, Guo M, Yates SR (2006) Degradation kinetics of manure-derived sulfadimethoxine in amended soil. J Agric Food Chem 54:157–163
Wang YJ, Jia DA, Sun RJ, Zhu HW, Zhou DM (2008) Adsorption and cosorption of tetracycline and copper(II) on montmorillonite as affected by solution pH. Environ Sci Technol 42:3254–3259
Wang C, Teppen BJ, Boyd SA, Li H (2012) Sorption of lincomycin at low concentrations from water by soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:1222–1228
Warman PR, Thomas RL (1981) Chlortetracycline in soil amended with poultry manure. Can J Soil Sci 61:161–163
Weerasinghe CA, Towner D (1997) Aerobic biodegradation of virginiamycin in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1873–1876
Wetzstein HG, Stadler M, Tichy HV et al (1999) Degradation of ciprofloxacin by basidiomycetes and identification of metabolites generated by the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum striatum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1556–1563
Wilson CJ, Brain RA, Sanderson H et al (2004) Structural and functional responses of plankton to a mixture of four tetracyclines in aquatic microcosms. Environ Sci Technol 38:6430–6439
Witte W (2000) Selective pressure by antibiotic use in livestock. Int J Antimicrob Agents 16:S19–S24
Wu CX, Spongberg AL, Witter JD et al (2010) Uptake of pharmaceutical and personal care products by soybean plants from soils applied with biosolids and irrigated with contaminated water. Environ Sci Technol 44:6157–6161
Yeager RL, Halley BA (1990) Sorption/desorption of [14C]efrotomycin with soils. J Agric Food Chem 38:883–886
Zhao L, Dong YH, Wang H (2010) Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci Total Environ 408:1069–1075
Zitnick KK, Shappell NW, Hakk H et al (2011) Effects of liquid swine manure on dissipation of 17beta-estradiol in soil. J Hazard Mater 186:1111–1117
Zou Y, Zheng W (2013) Modelling manure colloid-facilitated transport of the weakly hydrophobic antibiotic florfenicol in saturated soil columns. Environ Sci Technol 47:5185–5192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Song, W., Guo, M. (2014). Residual Veterinary Pharmaceuticals in Animal Manures and Their Environmental Behaviors in Soils. In: He, Z., Zhang, H. (eds) Applied Manure and Nutrient Chemistry for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8807-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8807-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8806-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8807-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)