Abstract
Wheat belongs to the three most important cereal crops of the world and is grown under a wide variety of climatic and agricultural conditions. Fungal pathogens represent the most relevant biotic stresses for wheat. These include different rust species, powdery mildew, leaf spots, as well as a number of other diseases that result in reduced grain yield and quality. Recently developed genomic tools allow new approaches to improve breeding for resistance to these pathogens based on a more efficient use of genetic resources. In this chapter, we will focus on the powdery mildew and Stagonospora nodorum blotch diseases and discuss the successful identification of wheat genes determining the outcome of pathogen-host interaction and the development of perfect markers for them. Genomic approaches, including gene cloning, allele mining, transcriptomics and comparative genomics have greatly changed and improved our understanding of molecular wheat-powdery mildew interactions. For the necrotrophic pathogen Stagonospora nodorum much of the interaction was found to be based on pathogen toxins and host susceptibility genes. The work on specific gene-for-gene interactions opened new possibilities for more efficient resistance breeding. In addition, the molecular identification of quantitatively acting resistance loci in wheat has made important progress, although only few such genes have been cloned, only one of them each against mildew and Stagonospora nodorum blotch. However, even at this early stage it can be foreseen that the new knowledge might revolutionize breeding for durable resistance in the near future. The progress made towards a whole genome sequence of wheat together with ongoing developments of high throughput techniques provides a completely new perspective on resistance breeding against these two diseases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Quantitative Trait Locus
- Powdery Mildew
- Powdery Mildew Resistance
- Adult Plant Resistance
- Powdery Mildew Resistance Gene
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
1.1 Emerging Challenges for Wheat Resistance Breeding Against Powdery Mildew and Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch: Changes in Agricultural Practice, Climate Change and Pathogen Adaptation
The powdery mildew disease occurs in crop growing regions worldwide. Before the green revolution, powdery mildew was found predominantly in regions with a cool, humid and semi-continental climate. However, with the introduction of new agricultural practices and intensified crop production during the last decades, powdery mildew has gained importance also in the more arid crop growing regions. Today, economically relevant powdery mildew epidemics cause serious yield losses in the cool and humid areas of China, North and South America, Northern Europe as well as in North and East Africa. The widespread use of irrigation systems and nitrogen fertilizers for yield improvement has created favourable conditions for this particular pathogen in additional agro-ecosystems. Wheat farmers can considerably influence powdery mildew epidemics by adapting appropriate agricultural practices, such as choosing the right sowing period, lower population densities or lower use of fertilizers. Breeding for genetic resistance to powdery mildew is nevertheless considered the most effective disease control strategy and will be discussed in detail below. Cultivar mixtures and low density planting are good strategies to slow disease development, but both have their specific problems and have been employed only occasionally so far. The application of foliar fungicides is often chosen as a last strategy if cultural practices are not able to control powdery mildew development. However, an intense use of fungicides can lead to fungicide resistance in the pathogen. This has become a major concern in Europe (Wolfe 1984).
Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) affects wheat grown under humid conditions and mild temperatures in Europe, South America, Central Asia and North Africa. In North America, China and Europe, the genetic diversity of S. nodorum populations is very high. It was shown that populations in Europe, North America and China have no or relatively little subdivision and serve as donors for disease distribution to other continents (Stukenbrock et al. 2006). Therefore, the suggested center of origin for S. nodorum in the Fertile Crescent coincides with the center of origin for wheat (Balter 2007; Burger et al. 2008). The distribution of S. nodorum is mainly human-mediated, which is the main way of disease transport from North America, Europe and China to other parts of the world (Stukenbrock et al. 2006). A wide range of fungicides are efficiently applied in the areas with SNB infections. Reports about fungicide-resistant isolates of S. nodorum are very rare. However, the possibility of their emergence remains a threat in regions with extensive fungicide application (Oliver et al. 2012).
Modern bread wheat is a temperate crop adapted to regions with annual rainfall between 30 and 90 cm. It is nowadays cultivated on both hemispheres under a wide range of climatic conditions and different soils, making up 17 % of all crop acreage. Although the impact of climate change on crops shows complex regional patterns, significant yield losses have been predicted using the worst case CO2 emission scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Luck et al. 2011). Climate change will not only differentially affect wheat cultivars in their geographic distribution and their growth, but also pathogens. Biotrophic pathogens such as powdery mildews, highly depend on the plant’s health and its water and nitrogen status (Olesen et al. 2000). As plant disease development and spreading is influenced pre-dominantly by increased atmospheric CO2 levels, heavy rains, increased humidity, drought and warmer winter temperatures (Cannon 1998; Chakraborty et al. 2000; Pimentel et al. 2001; Berry et al. 2002; Anderson et al. 2004) we can expect that the lifecycle of some pathogens will be limited by increasing temperatures, while other pathogen species might respond positively to the same climatic changes. Changes in global minimum temperatures and rainfall patterns will presumably cause shifts in growing seasons of certain wheat cultivars and alter the land use of specific crops. This might then in turn lead to the occurrence of novel plant-pathogen interactions through the introduction of new host genotypes, new pathogens or both to a specific agro-ecosystem. In addition, temperature changes in critical periods of host infection might reduce the effectiveness of resistance genes, as it has been shown that some R genes against powdery mildew are known to be temperature-sensitive (Ge et al. 1998).
Clearly, based on the considerations described above, we can expect that climate change will have multiple, highly complex effects on plant disease epidemiology and the consequences on yield are difficult to predict. As today’s agriculture primarily aims at crop yield improvement and breeding programs mainly focus on cultivars adapted to longer growth periods, drought and stress tolerance, it is of great importance to establish efficient disease screening methods which allow to monitor changing disease epidemics. This is because pathogens are not only important yield-reducing factors, but due to their short generation times also act as early indicators of environmental changes (Newton et al. 2011). Intensifying the research of climate change effects on plant-pathogen systems will certainly allow an improvement of the disease management practices necessary for a sustainable agriculture.
1.2 Wheat as the Host Plant for Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici and Stagonospora nodorum
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum, 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) belongs to the four most important cereal crops in modern agriculture (http://www.FAOSTAT.org). The FAO estimates that 682.5 million t of wheat was harvested in the year 2011. Bread wheat accounts for approximately 20 % of the totally consumed human food calories and provides the major staple food for 40 % of the human population, predominantly in Europe, North America and the western and northern parts of Asia (Peng et al. 2011). The origin of modern bread wheat lies in a region of the Near East known as the Fertile Crescent which covers parts of south-eastern Turkey, Israel, Syria, Iraq and Jordan. There, wild wheat progenitors such as Einkorn or Emmer (He et al. 2009), were among the first cereals subjected to human selection 10,000 years ago (Charmet 2011). Hexaploid bread wheat originated approximately 9,000 years ago from a hybridization event between the allotetraploid domesticated Emmer wheat (T. turgidum spp. dicoccoides (2n = 4x = AABB) and the diploid wild goatgrass Ae. tauschii (2n = 2x = DD). Bread wheat and its wild progenitors were selected by the first farmers for agriculturally advantageous traits in the specific agroecological system where domestication occurred. These traits also included disease resistance to fungal pathogens.
1.3 Characteristics of Powdery Mildew and Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch Diseases in Agricultural Systems
The powdery mildew pathogen of barley, Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei, was found to have evolved on wild grasses in the Middle East (Koltin and Kenneth 1970; Wolfe 1984). Comparative genome analysis of wheat and barley powdery mildew revealed that these two formae specialies diverged about 10 million years ago, after divergence of their respective hosts (Oberhaensli et al. 2011). This suggests that the wheat powdery mildew, Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici, originates from an ancestral pathogen which initially colonized ancestors of both wild wheat and barley. There is evidence that wheat powdery mildew originated and co-existed with wild wheat long before their domestication (Wicker et al. 2013).
Wheat yield losses caused by the two wheat fungal pathogens powdery mildew and Stagonospora nodorum are difficult to estimate. In controlled experimental environments, it is feasible to measure yield losses, but on farmer’s fields, crop health and actual losses are significantly different from experimental calculations. Oerke et al. (1994) estimated that collectively all wheat diseases cause annual grain losses of about 12.4 %, including all developed and developing countries. Disease epidemics of the two described wheat pathogens of this chapter, powdery mildew and SNB, depend mostly on three factors: prevalence of inoculum, the genetic constitution of grown cultivars, and to a large extent on environmental conditions (Duveiller et al. 2007). The changes in agricultural practices during the last decades have led to changes at the microclimate level in wheat growing areas. In order to increase productivity, genetically uniform varieties are planted in dense stands. These genotypes contain often semi-dwarf varieties and have a high tillering density, thus increasing the humidity within the crop canopy. In addition, the regular application of nitrogen fertilizers and irrigation creates a microclimate which is highly favourable for the spreading of biotrophic fungal diseases (Sharma et al. 2004).
Systematic reports on SNB epidemics are lacking from most of the wheat growing areas. The most complete dataset is available from Rothamsted Broadbalk experiment archive (UK). There, wheat leaf samples have been collected for nearly 160 years (from 1844 to 2003) and used to estimate the epidemics of SNB and Septoria tritici blotch (STB) caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola (Bearchell et al. 2005; Shaw et al. 2008). The predominance of SNB was shifted towards M. graminicola after 1970. Bearchell et al. (2005) linked this shift in predominance of STB over SNB to the decrease in SO2 emissions after 1970. Another suggested reason is that before 1970 the widely used cultivars had good partial resistance to STB, but not to SNB. Later, large efforts were made to introduce SNB resistance in newly released cultivars (Arraiano et al. 2009). Additionally, in Western Australia in regions where SNB dominates SO2 pollution is very low. Therefore, the shift between SNB and STB epidemics is likely caused by a combination of factors (Oliver et al. 2012).
Breeding for resistant wheat varieties is the most effective strategy to counteract fungal diseases. Despite an overall good success of resistance breeding, changes in wheat genotypes as well as pathogen races are frequent, making breeding for disease resistance a continuous task. It is obvious that a better understanding about the molecular basis of disease resistance in wheat can contribute significantly to improve strategies in achieving resistance and to make resistance breeding faster and more efficient. Importantly, this can be achieved through the use of recently developed genomic tools such as high-throughput platforms for molecular marker analysis and genotyping in combination with classical breeding methods and increasing knowledge on the genomes of wheat and its relatives. Various genomics-assisted breeding approaches such as marker-assisted selection (MAS), association mapping, QTL identification and MAS for them, as well as genome-wide association studies have been successfully utilized in modern plant breeding for the development of improved crop varieties. The limited number of molecularly cloned resistance genes/QTL in wheat can be explained by the genetic complexity observed in this species. The large wheat genome size and the high amount of repetitive DNA (80 %) makes map-based cloning in wheat a challenging task. Nevertheless, some disease resistance genes (Lr1, Lr10, Lr21, Lr34/Yr18/Pm38, Yr36, Pm3b and Tsn1) have been cloned from hexaploid wheat (Feuillet et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2003; Yahiaoui et al. 2004; Cloutier et al. 2007; Qiu et al. 2007; Fu et al. 2009; Krattinger et al. 2009, Faris et al. 2010) using sub-genome chromosome walking techniques and comparative genomics.
In this chapter we will describe how genomic approaches for wheat resistance breeding against powdery mildew and Stagonospora nodorum leaf blotch have been used in the last years: the work discussed includes classical map-based cloning approaches but also new strategies such as allelemining and the use of transcriptomics and finally the new and exciting field of transgenic use of modified resistance genes.
2 Genomics-Assisted Breeding by Cloning of Major Resistance Genes
Major race-specific resistance genes can provide plants with a level of disease resistance which is close to immunity. However, fungal pathogens are fast evolving pathogens, which under selection pressure can rapidly adapt to overcome plant resistance mechanisms. Thus, there is a strong need to (i) identify new and durable sources of genetic resistance in order to avoid an erosion of the current pool of agriculturally important resistance genes and to find (ii) new and innovative ways to use the known resistance genes in a more durable way (Fig. 15.1).
2.1 Map-Based Cloning of Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes
2.1.1 Wheat Powdery Mildew: A Strictly Biotrophic Pathogen
Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici, the causal agent of wheat powdery mildew is a highly specific pathogen which grows only on wheat species. It belongs to the obligate biotrophic pathogens which fully depend on the integrity of the invaded host plant cell (Horbach et al. 2011) to accomplish all important stages of pathogenesis such as attachment, host recognition, penetration and proliferation (Mendgen and Hahn 2002). The infection process starts when a spore lands on a leaf surface, germinates and forms a primary and appressorial germ tube. The appressorium penetrates the cell wall using mechanical force and cell walldegrading enzymes, and invaginates the plant cell by forming a special feeding structure—the haustorium, which is surrounded by an extrahaustorial plasma membrane. The haustorium is not only required for nutrient supply, but is also important for signalling, communication and prevention of recognition by the host (Perfect and Green 2001; Horbach et al. 2011). Since it is essential for the pathogen to keep the host cell alive, biotrophic fungi suppress the programmed cell death induced at the infection site—a defense response known as hypersensitive reaction (HR). This defense suppression is possibly the result of the release of effector proteins during the penetration process (Panstruga 2003). Only very recently, the genome sequence of the barley powdery mildew became available (Spanu et al. 2010) and a genome sequence of the wheat powdery mildew can be expected in the near future (Wicker et al. 2013). This genomic sequence information provides an extremely valuable tool to gain a better understanding of the biology of the powdery mildew pathogen, the factors required for biotrophy as well as virulence determinants. In addition, comparative genome analysis between the wheat and barley powdery mildews will allow an improvement of our understanding of host specialization in these diseases. Only by improved knowledge on all the components of the host-pathogen interaction, we will be able to develop rational resistance improvement based on molecular interactions in the future.
To date, 61 powdery mildew resistance genes including three recessive genes (Pm5, Pm9 and Pm26) have been genetically described. They confer resistance against specific races of the pathogen and have been identified and mapped to 46 loci in the wheat genome (He et al. 2009; Hua et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2012). Out of these, Lillemo et al. (2008) identified two race non-specific genes, Pm38 and Pm39 which confer partial resistance. Among these 61 genes, only Pm3b (Yahiaoui et al. 2004), Pm21 (Cao et al. 2011) and Pm38 (Krattinger et al. 2009) have been cloned so far.
2.1.2 Wheat Genomics at Different Ploidy Levels Allows the Isolation of the Pm3 Powdery Mildew Resistance Alleles in Wheat
A map-based cloning approach was used to isolate the Pm3b gene that controls powdery mildew resistance in the hexaploid wheat landrace Chul. The powdery mildew resistance gene was mapped genetically to the distal end of the short arm of chromosome 1A in 1,340 plants of a Chul x Frisal derived F2 population. Physical mapping was performed by using BAC libraries developed from the diploid wheat T. monococcum cv. DV92 and the tetraploid T. durum cv. Langdon wheat. By using these BAC libraries, Yahiaoui et al. (2004) proved the usefulness of exploiting wheat genomes with different ploidy levels, and combined sub-genome chromosome walking with haplotype analysis. The sub-genome chromosome walking between the three wheat species revealed dissimilarities in the haplotype structures at the Pm3 locus. Haplotype similarity was found between the durum wheat cv. Langdon and the susceptible hexaploid parent Frisal, whereas only partial similarity between the haplotypes of T. monococcum cv. DV92 and the resistant parent Chul was observed. This led to the isolation of the Pm3b gene from the hexaploid wheat donor line by deriving low copy probes from the conserved resistance-gene-like sequences in both genomes using long-range PCR (Yahiaoui et al. 2004). Validation of the candidate gene was done by γ- irradiated mutant analysis. Molecular analysis of 13 independent mutants showed six different deletion patterns. One mutant without any major deletion at the Pm3 locus showed a single base pair deletion in the coding region of the candidate gene resulting in loss of expression as demonstrated by RT-PCR. Hence, the candidate gene for Pm3b could be confirmed.
The rapid resistance response occurring in leaf epidermal cells in the case of an incompatible interaction between wheat and powdery mildew leads to a termination of pre-haustorial fungal growth. This hypersensitive response provides the basis to study resistance gene function by a particle bombardment based, transient transformation of leaf epidermal cells. Using the GUS reporter gene (Schweizer et al. 1999; Douchkov et al. 2005), transformed cells undergoing an active defense response can be identified by co-bombarding the candidate gene with the GUS reporter plasmid. Thus, this functional assay does not require the time consuming procedure of generating stably transformed wheat plants. With this transient transformation assay Pm3b was functionally validated and assigned to the biggest class of R gene family, the CC-NBS-LRR proteins. It encodes a domain with 28 well conserved LRR domains and a protein of 1,415 amino acids. Subsequently, additional 7 Pm3 alleles (Pm3a-3 g) were identified from other genetic backgrounds providing race-specific resistance to a different subsets of powdery mildew isolates, and used to develop functional allele-specific markers for germplasm screening (Tommasini et al. 2006) (Table 15.1).
2.1.3 Cloning of Pm21: Integration of Map-Based Cloning and Gene Expression Analysis to Isolate the Pm21 Gene from a Non-Recombining Genetic Region
Gene expression analysis has complemented map-based cloning approaches and helped to identify a second powdery mildew resistance gene from wheat. Cao et al. (2011) used a high-throughput strategy of GeneChip microarray analysis in combination with genetic mapping to isolate Pm21, an important source of durable and broad spectrum resistance to wheat powdery mildew. Pm21 was originally transferred from the short arm of chromosome 6V of the wild wheat relative Haynaldia villosa (2n = 2x = 14) to cultivated wheat by the development of a 6VS.6AL translocation line. Approaches to isolate Pm21 by map-based cloning using this translocation line were unsuccessful due to the low chromosome pairing frequency and suppressed recombination between the 6VS chromosome from H. villosa and chromosome 6AS from wheat. A GeneChip approach was therefore applied to identify genes that are up-regulated upon Bgt infection in H. villosa compared to the mock control. Among the 196 differentially expressed genes, four resistance gene analogs (RGAs) were identified which were selected for further investigation. Using a series of alien deletion and translocation lines these genes were cytogenetically mapped by in situ hybridization ( FISH). Only one RGA, a putative serine/threonine protein kinase (Stpk-V), was found to localize on chromosome 6VS of H. villosa, thus making this the best candidate gene for the Pm21 resistance activity. Expression of Stpk-V was suggested to alter the function of target proteins by phosphorylation of serine or threonine residues. A significant decrease in the haustorial index was observed when epidermal cells were co-transformed with the GUS and the Stpk-V gene, in comparison to cells only transformed with the GUS gene. Also, transgenic plants expressing the Stpk-V gene showed an increased broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance compared to the controls. Further validation of this gene was provided by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), where increased susceptibility was observed in Stpk-V silenced wheat and its wild relative. The isolation of Pm21 sets a promising example for future efforts to identify potentially useful genetic sources from wild species by integration of cytogenetic, molecular and transcriptomic methods.
As discussed above for the Pm21 gene, until recently high-throughput analysis of transcriptomes relied on the microarray technology (Varshney et al. 2009). Microarray based expression profiling has been successfully used to investigate and compare the transcript patterns in various cell types and organisms, however, tracking genetic diversity at the transcript level using the microarray technology has some limitations: Firstly, microarray technology is limited to already existing sequence information of genomes and their annotation. Thus, the gene content available on the array restricts the expression data which can be collected. Further, sensitivity and specificity can be low. The recent development of next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques allows sequencing of the entire transcriptome at a much higher coverage. Compared to the microarray technology, RNA sequencing also has the advantage of providing an unbiased representation of all transcripts. In addition, rare transcripts or alternative splice variants can be detected, as well as allele specific expression and expressed single nucleotide polymorphisms. Sequence variation at RNA levels is therefore more likely to be detected using next generation transcriptomics. Thus, NGS techniques combined with classical cloning methods serve as potentially useful tools to isolate additional disease resistance genes from wheat in the near future.
2.1.4 Allele Mining as a Strategy to Identify Additional and Novel Resistance Sources
The identification of genetic resistance sources in wheat and their combination and accumulation in particular cultivars has greatly contributed to the progress in resistance breeding. Nevertheless, we can presume that a huge portion of beneficial resistance genes in the wheat gene pool remains unexploited (Kumar et al. 2010). Several studies have found that resistance in cultivated wheat could be significantly improved by introducing novel alleles from wild relatives. It was further observed that expression of novel alleles or combinations thereof can vary tremendously depending on the genetic background (McCouch et al. 2007; Cao et al. 2011). Thus, a great potential exists in finding new resistance sources by re-investigating the large germplasm material of wild progenitors or landraces and expressing the new genes in different genetic backgrounds. With the recent development of NGS technologies, sequence information from several crop species has greatly improved and made publicly available to the research community. Although this will presumably accelerate resistance gene discovery in wheat, our current knowledge about resistance genes is still very limited. Thus, it is even more important to use the existing knowledge on cloned resistance genes and exploit the genome information from germplasm resources in order to identify novel, potentially functional alleles. The cloning of the wheat Pm3 gene and the molecular characterization of its alleles, together with the development of allele-specific markers, allowed an in-depth investigation of a large set of wheat landraces, aiming at the identification of new, potentially functional Pm3 alleles (Kaur et al. 2008).
The dissection of naturally occurring variation at a known candidate gene locus is also referred to as “allele mining”, a strategy taking advantage of an overall high sequence conservation at a specific locus (Kumar et al. 2010). Initial allele-mining studies focused on identification of sequence variation in coding sequences of important loci. However, with increasing evidence for non-coding regions having large effects on transcript and trait expression, mining for sequence variation in regulatory regions of resistance loci is relevant, too. In “promoter mining”, promoter regions instead of gene coding sequences are investigated for sequence variation. Both allele and promoter mining have several important applications in resistance breeding. Superior and novel alleles can be identified, new markers can be developed to allow rapid identification of different haplotypes in marker-assisted selection, and evolutionary studies can be performed as well as expression studies. However, there are major considerations for a successful and efficient allele mining approach: besides the requirement of sufficient genome sequence information, there should be high-throughput techniques available to generate allelic data and efficient bioinformatic tools to identify nucleotide variation. Once novel alleles have been identified, a reliable and rapid system for functional validation of the novel alleles is desired. Besides these technical considerations, the foremost challenge in allele mining is the selection of a manageable and sensible number of genotypes capturing the highest possible sequence variation at a specific locus. One possible strategy is the Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy (FIGS) which allows the identification of trait-specific sets of accessions with maximum diversity. Assuming that the frequency of the trait of interest is strongly influenced by the environment and is based on adaptive selection processes, accessions are selected according to eco-climatic parameters of their original collection sites (Endresen et al. 2011). To date, FIGS has been successfully used to identify new genetic diversity for resistance against abiotic and biotic stresses and specifically also in the case of Pm3 based resistance (Bhullar et al. 2009). There, 1,320 accessions from 323 geographic sites with potentially high selection pressure for powdery mildew resistance were selected from a virtual collection of 16,089 accessions, and tested against different powdery mildew isolates (Kaur et al. 2008). Among them, 211 accessions which showed complete or intermediate resistance were further analyzed at the molecular level. 111 landraces which were positive for a Pm3 diagnostic fragment, but did not amplify specific markers for the known Pm3a-Pm3g alleles, were selected as candidates for potentially new functional Pm3 alleles. Functional analysis of these 111 candidates used a combination of pathogenicity assays and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), and resulted in the identification of seven new functional alleles (Pm3l-Pm3r) in addition to previously described alleles. As the FIGS screening set contained accessions from a limited geographic area (with a strong focus on the Near East), a new set including accessions from more diverse locations was screened to investigate Pm3 diversity in more depth. From a collection of an additional 733 wheat accessions eight new Pm3 sequences were isolated. From these, two additional novel alleles, originating from Nepal (Pm3s) and China (Pm3t) respectively could be functionally validated (Bhullar et al. 2010). Thus, the large genebank collections comprising germplasm of wild wheat relatives and landraces provide a great potential to identify new resistance resources. In the case of the Pm3 alleles, out of 30 different countries most of the functional alleles were isolated from accessions originating from Turkey, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, China and Nepal (Bhullar et al. 2010). The germplasm derived specifically from these countries therefore has a great potential for further exploration specifically for powdery mildew resistance.
2.1.5 Field Assessment of Wheat Lines Carrying a Transgenic Pm3 Resistance Gene
The molecular isolation of the two powdery mildew resistance genes Pm3 and Pm21 also provided the opportunity to modify their expression and investigate their efficiency under natural field conditions using transgenic approaches. This has been described in some detail for the Pm3 resistance alleles. The question was if transgenic genes, under the control of a constitutive promotor would result in improved resistance, and if mixtures of genotypes with the same genetic background, but containing different Pm3 alleles (so called multilines) would show enhanced resistance due to a mixture effect.
In order to test the transgenic use of race-specific R genes for their effectiveness in the field, transgenic wheat lines over-expressing Pm3a, Pm3b, Pm3c, Pm3d, Pm3f or Pm3 g were analyzed during one to three field seasons. All 12 tested transgenic lines were significantly more resistant than their respective non-transformed sister lines but the Pm3 lines showed differences in the level of powdery mildew resistance. These differences were possibly caused by the differences in frequency of virulence to the particular Pm3 allele in the powdery mildew population, Pm3 expression levels and most likely also allele-specific properties. Half of the transgenic lines revealed additional phenotypes in the field, which were not visible under greenhouse conditions. Besides an increased powdery mildew resistance, three of four independent transgenic events carrying Pm3b, two Pm3f lines and a Pm3g line exhibited a leaf chlorosis phenotype, reduced fertility or a reduced plant height (Brunner et al. 2011). High Pm3 gene expression levels or PM3 protein accumulation were the most likely, but not all-embracing explanation for these phenotypes. This work showed the importance of field trials for assessment of agronomically relevant disease resistance. It further showed that the success of a transgenic use of R-genes in the field critically depends on optimization of expression levels, for example by using tissue and/or development-specific promoters.
To improve the durability of major R genes such as Pm3, the multiline strategy has been proven to be effective in small grain crops (Zhu et al. 2000; Mundt 2002). Multilines are seed mixtures of agronomically uniform lines that differ only in a specific trait, mostly disease resistance. Brunner et al.( 2012) could show in a multiline field experiment that two-way seed mixtures between transgenic lines carrying Pm3a, Pm3b or Pm3d significantly increased the powdery mildew resistance when compared to the mean of the pure component lines alone. This demonstrates that diversity in a single R gene is sufficient to improve resistance levels when used in multilines, most probably through host-diversity effects.
2.1.6 The Use of Natural Variation to Make Artificial Resistance Genes with Broadened Specificity
The durability of major R-genes can possibly be improved by designing artificial resistance genes exhibiting broadened specificity. A successful example of this strategy was provided by Brunner et al. (2010) where they investigated in detail the powdery mildew isolate recognition spectra of different Pm3 alleles and identified some alleles with enlarged resistance spectra compared to others. Sequence analysis of the natural variation occurring in the Pm3 alleles exhibiting broad or narrow resistance spectra, allowed to propose hypotheses on the functional roles of individual protein subdomains. Domain-swap experiments revealed for example that the NB-ARC domain is also playing a role in resistance specificity, although pathogen recognition specificity is mostly determined by the LRR-domain. A chimeric, artificial PM3 protein combining different polymorphic residues of the functional alleles proved that intramolecular pyramiding of different R-gene recognition specificities is possible and a new resistance gene with a broader specificity can be made.
2.1.7 Molecular Analysis of Quantitative Resistance Against Wheat Powdery Mildew
Race-specific powdery mildew resistance genes based on a gene-for-gene interaction with the corresponding pathogen avirulence genes confer strong and effective resistance. Thus, there has been an extensive use of these race-specific R genes during the past decades. In the natural situation, the gene-for-gene relationship reflects a co-evolution between the pathogen and the host, where advantageous polymorphisms for either host resistance or pathogen virulence are balanced and stable. If the factors important for this balance are lost, as it is the case in modern agricultural systems, parasite evolution becomes instable and pathogens evolve at much higher rates. Thus, host-pathogen dynamics resemble more an arms race and this type of resistance becomes of short duration only (Brown and Tellier 2011). It is therefore of great importance to reduce the opportunities for a pathogen to adapt to crop resistance, for example by increasing the genetic diversity of crops or by taking advantage of resistance genes interacting with costly pathogen avirulence genes. Most importantly, exploring durable or quantitative sources of resistance with a combination of several minor genes can greatly help to control powdery mildew diseases in a durable way. Quantitative resistance, also referred to as slow-mildewing or partial resistance is controlled by several genetic loci. It is also known as adult plant resistance (APR) due to the compatible interaction at all stages of growth combined with low infection frequency, prolonged latency period and reduced sporulation at adult plant stage. A series of studies has been conducted on the identification and mapping of quantitative loci involved in disease resistance in the past few years. The development of reliable selection tools has greatly helped to include APR genes in wheat breeding programs. APRs for powdery mildew have been mapped to all homeologous chromosomes of the wheat genome (Sharma et al. 2011). However, to date, there are very few success stories on the molecular isolation of quantitative resistance genes in plants, one being the isolation of the resistance gene, Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 in wheat (Krattinger et al. 2009). Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 presents one of the most important durable, race non-specific, adult plant resistance (APR) gene resources which was first identified in Canada by Dyck et al. (1966). Besides providing resistance to leaf rust, it also confers resistance against stripe rust (Yr18) (McIntosh 1992), powdery mildew (Pm38) (Spielmeyer et al. 2005; Lillemo et al. 2007), stem rust (Dyck 1987) and tolerance to barley yellow dwarf virus (Bdv1) (Ayala et al. 2002). Being an APR in nature, Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 is most effective in the flag leaves of adult plants which also develop necrotic leaf tips, a morphological marker known as leaf tip necrosis (Ltn) associated with the presence of Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 (Dyck 1991; Singh 1992).
The consensus genetic map of three Lr34/Yr18/Pm38– based high resolution mapping populations, marked the target interval of 0.15 cM for the Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 locus. The complete sequencing of a 363 kb physical target interval from the Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 containing Chinese Spring cultivar revealed eight open reading frames as candidate genes. These open reading frames shared homologies to a hexose carrier, an ATP- binding cassette (ABC) transporter, two cytochromes P450, two lectin receptor kinases, a cysteine proteinase and a glycosyl transferase (Krattinger et al. 2009). Sequence analysis of the candidate gene coding regions from the parental alleles as well as the Lr34 mutants identified several sequence polymorphisms in the ABC transporter gene leading to either splice site mutations, amino acid changes, frame shift mutations or pre-mature stop codons, thus confirming the ABC transporter gene as the Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 gene providing durable resistance against leaf rust (Krattinger et al. 2009). Thus, the Pm38 gene is the first cloned quantitatively acting disease resistance gene against powdery mildew and was also reported in the cultivars Fukoho-Komugi and Saar from Japan and CIMMYT, respectively (Liang et al. 2006; Lillemo et al. 2008). As discussed above, there are many additional quantitative trait loci (QTL) involved in powdery mildew resistance. Keller et al. (1999) identified 18 QTLs against powdery mildew in a segregating wheat x spelt (Triticum spelta) population explaining 77 % of the phenotypic variation. However, in most of the cases only 1–4 QTLs have major effects. The wheat cultivars Knox (Shaner 1973) and Massey (Griffey and Das 1994) are two cultivars showing effective powdery mildew APR, which presumably is governed by two to three genes only. Similarly, several other QTLs have been identified in different wheat cultivars originating from different countries such as RE 714, Festin, Courtot and RE 9001 from France (Chantret et al. 2001; Mingeot et al. 2002; Bougot et al. 2006), USG3209 from North America (Tucker et al. 2007), Oligoculm from Israel (Liang et al. 2006), Avocet from Australia (Lillemo et al. 2008), Suwon 92 from Korea (Xu et al. 2006) and Bainong64 originating from China (Lan et al. 2009). Once molecular markers for a number of QTL contributing additively to powdery mildew resistance are known, this will allow a very efficient breeding approach to combine such loci and obtain genotypes with sufficient field resistance efficiently.
2.2 Basis of Resistance to Stagonospora Nodorum Leaf Blotch in Wheat
Being a necrotrophic fungus, Phaeosphaeria nodorum (anamorph Stagonospora nodorum) infects and kills wheat leaf tissue and feeds from the organic compounds of the dead cells during its life cycle. To invade wheat leaves, S. nodorum produces proteinaceous Host Selective Toxins (HST). These HSTs interact with the plant host in a mirrored gene-for-gene interaction. In the following paragraphs, we will describe the current knowledge on toxin- mediated resistance to Stagonospora nodorum blotch (Oliver et al. 2012).
2.2.1 Interactions Between Fungal Toxins and Wheat Sensitivity Genes Cause Susceptibility
According to the classical gene-for-gene model developed by (Flor 1955), a pathogen is only able to invade the host successfully if the plant does not recognize the pathogens virulence factor by a corresponding R gene. In the mirrored gene-for gene interaction of Stagonospora nodorum leaf blotch, the infection will be successful only if the wheat cultivar has a corresponding susceptibility gene (Friesen et al. 2007). This type of interaction was identified as the cause of a few additional fungal diseases in different plant species (Table 15.2) (Mengiste 2012).
The recently sequenced genome of S. nodorum provided the opportunity to study the genetic basis of pathogenicity together with other features of the fungal lifestyle. The genome size was estimated to be 37.2 Mbp (Hane et al. 2007) and gene predictions and EST library analysis suggested that the genome contains at least 10,762 genes. Interestingly, a large number of identified genes were predicted to encode secreted proteins with no similarity to any known genes. Possibly, new host-selective toxins are among these genes. For instance, the host-selective toxin SnTox1 was identified by screening the whole S. nodorum genome for suitable candidates and then testing them in infection experiments (Liu et al. 2012).
Different strains of S. nodorum produce a range of HSTs. Five different toxins SnToxA, SnTox1, SnTox2, SnTox3 and SnTox4 have been identified until now (Liu et al. 2004a; Friesen et al. 2006; Friesen et al. 2007; Abeysekara et al. 2009). The susceptibility genes for all five toxins were mapped to different regions of the wheat genome: Tsn1 interacts with ToxA and this interaction explains 77 % of the phenotypic variation in the population of cultivars ‘BR34’ and ‘Grandin’ (Liu et al. 2006) and 95 % of the phenotypic variation in the LD5B population of tetraploid wheat (Faris and Friesen 2009). The Snn1 and SnTox1 interaction explains 58 % of variation in the ITMI population (Liu et al. 2004b) and Snn2 – SnTox2, Snn3 – SnTox3 and Snn4 – SnTox4 are responsible for 47, 17 and 41 %, respectively, observed in segregating wheat populations derived from a cross between the hard red spring wheat line BR34 and cultivar Grandin for Snn2 and Snn3, and a RIL population of Arina x Forno for Snn4 (Abeysekara et al. 2009). Interestingly, each fungal toxin-wheat gene interaction is qualitative, but they contribute to the resistance response in a quantitative manner. For example, SnToxA-Tsn1 and SnTox2-Snn2 have additive effects during the infection (Oliver et al. 2012).
2.2.2 Quantitative Resistance to SNB
Classical genetic studies suggest that resistance to SNB is complex and in most cases polygenic (Scott et al. 1982; Fried and Meister 1987; Bostwick et al. 1993; Du et al. 1999). Monogenic resistance was also identified in some wheat varieties (Kleijer et al. 1977; Ma and Hughes 1995; Murphy et al. 2000). The resistance responses to SNB on leaves and glumes are genetically independent (Francki et al. 2011). Several QTL controlling partial resistance to Stagonospora nodorum blotch in seedlings were identified on chromosomes 2B, 3B, 5B and 5D using a double haploid population derived from a cross of winter wheat cultivars ‘Liwilla’ and ‘Begra’ (Czembor et al. 2003). However, their effect on adult plants was not tested. QTLs for resistance to SNB on the flag leaf might correspond to the loci associated with toxin insensitivity genes in the wheat genome: for example, Francki et al. (2011) discovered three QTLs using a cross of winter wheat ‘P92201D5’ and spring wheat ‘EGA Blanko’. Two of them, located on chromosomes 1BS and 2AS respectively, did not correlate with any known toxin sensitivity genes. In contrast, the third QTL on chromosome 5BL was associated with Tsn1-ToxA insensitivity. Independent genetic control of resistance to SNB in glumes and leaves combined with diverse resistance on different stages of plant growth suggests that the best strategy for breeding is to combine the different genetic loci and take advantage of their additive effects.
2.2.3 The SNB Susceptibility Gene Tsn1 Encodes an NBS-LRR Protein
The susceptibility genes have additive effects if multiple compatible interactions are acting at the same time. Therefore, disease resistance to Stagonospora nodorum leaf blotch depends on the presence of susceptibility genes and is quantitatively inherited (Abeysekara et al. 2009). Tsn1 confers sensitivity to SnToxA and is located on the long arm of chromosome 5B. The Tsn1 gene was recently cloned using a classical chromosome walking approach after establishing a physical contig of 350 kb containing the flanking markers (Faris et al. 2010). Bioinformatic analysis identified six genes cosegregating with Tsn1. An association study on 386 wheat accession narrowed the number of candidates down to four genes. Further validation revealed that Tsn1 has a resistance gene-like structure consisting of a nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) and a serine/threonine protein kinase (S/TPK) domain. Mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that all three domains are required for disease susceptibility. The analysis of Tsn1 suggests that the gene originated from a B-genome donor through a gene fusion. The exact mechanism of the HST-gene interaction still remains unknown. The presence of Tsn1 is required for ToxA recognition, but yeast two-hybrid experiments suggest that the Tsn1 protein does not interact directly with ToxA. It was shown that Tsn1 transcription is regulated by the circadian clock and light, indicating that the Tsn1-ToxA interactions are linked to photosynthesis processes. Faris et al. (2010) suggested that in the case of Tsn1- ToxA interaction, S. nodorum may have subverted a wheat defence mechanism based on an NBS-LRR immune receptor that was (and possibly still is) involved in resistance against a different pathogen species.
2.2.4 Genomics-Assisted Use of Genetic Resources for SNB Resistance Breeding Based on the Molecular Understanding of the Pathosystem
Based on the recent findings on host-specific toxins in the S. nodorum-wheat pathosystem, it is evident that the presence or absence of specific toxin receptors in the widely grown wheat cultivars will have a significant impact on disease prevalence. It was recently shown (McDonald et al. 2013) that there are significant differences between the frequencies of toxin presence in S. nodorum isolates originating from different geographical regions. This suggests that the presence/absence of sensitivity genes in the cultivars grown in particular regions has a strong effect: whenever a cultivar contains the sensitivity gene corresponding to a specific toxin, the presence of this toxin will be of selective advantage for the pathogen and races with the toxin will increase in frequency. On the other hand, if the sensitivity gene is absent, there will be no selective advantage for having the toxin and it is likely that the frequency of such races will decrease.
These findings immediately suggest that a breeding strategy which has the goal to eliminate as many relevant susceptibilty genes as possible from the germplasm, might be effective (it remains to be determined which ones belong to this group in addition to Tsn1). This has not been tried yet but has considerable potential to reduce the problem of SNB based on diagnostic markers for a limited subset of toxin susceptibility genes. The markers would allow the elimination of all breeding material with active susceptibility genes. Clearly, this will only be possible if the molecular differences between susceptible and non-susceptible alleles will be known. At this stage, only the Tsn1 receptor is cloned and more map-based cloning projects are needed to molecularly isolate the other toxin receptor genes. Ideally such an effort to eliminate susceptible lines would be coordinated in large geographical areas to ensure success and reduce the frequency of toxin genes. Such a project is ongoing in Australia to eliminate the Tsn1 gene from commercial germplasm (Oliver and Solomon 2010; Waters et al. 2011).
In conclusion, based on the molecular advancements in understanding the S. nodorum-wheat pathosystem, future resistance breeding efforts will possibly rely more on molecular markers for selecting against susceptibility (receptor) genes and not only depend on phenotyping under field conditions. It will be interesting to see if similar type of genes is responsible for resistance to Stagonospora nodorum glume blotch, the disease on the glume. As resistance in the glume is inherited independently from resistance in the leaf, other genetic factors must be involved (Schnurbusch et al. 2003).
2.2.5 Genomics Reveals an Interspecific Gene Transfer and Rapid Virulence Evolution in a Wheat Pathogen
It is assumed that rapid diversification of effectors in pathogens is closely linked to the avoidance of detection by the plant immune system (Dodds et al. 2006). Biotrophs, such as powdery mildew, are seeking for new ways to overcome the resistance genes and colonize the host. In contrast, necrotrophic pathogens benefit from the hypersensitive response and feed from the dead tissue. However, the diversification of effectors plays an important role for necrotrophs as well. It was suggested that the diversity of fungal toxins found in necrotrophs and in particular in S. nodorum can be explained by two hypotheses. The first hypothesis postulates that necrotrophs gain evolutionary benefits by tracking the appearance of new sensitivity alleles in the host (Stukenbrock and McDonald 2007). The second hypothesis suggests that the diversification of the toxins allows the pathogen to increase its fitness and aggressiveness (Tan et al. 2012). Effector diversity is the result of recombination and mutation events in the toxin genes, but also of non-vertical genetic exchanges (horizontal gene transfer) known to occur in filamentous fungi. It was found that some genes in the S. nodorum genome have no homology to any known genes in closely related fungi. The presence of those genes might indicate that they were acquired by horizontal transfer from another, more distantly related species (Oliver et al. 2012). Recently, Friesen et al. (2006) provided evidence for the gene transfer between the two fungal pathogens S. nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. P. tritici-repentis produces the host-selective toxin ToxA. The ToxA gene was cloned previously by Ciuffetti et al. (1997). Analysis of the sequenced S. nodorum genome (Hane et al. 2007) revealed the presence of a close homolog with a similar gene structure consisting of three exons and two introns and sharing 99.7 % identity with the P. tritici-repentis ToxA. The high similarity suggests a recent common ancestor gene. Several isolates of S. nodorum and P. tritici-repentis with different geographical origins were tested for their ToxA sequence diversity. Among 95 S. nodorum and 54 P. tritici-repentis ToxA amplicons only one haplotype was identified for P. tritici-repentis whereas 11 haplotypes were found in S. nodorum. This suggests that the ToxA gene was more ancient in the S. nodorum genome and was probably introduced only recently in the P.tritici-repentis genome. Further analysis of the 11 kb genomic region flanking the ToxA gene in both species revealed a high degree of conservation: 80–90 % in the distal parts and 98–100 % in the middle. Additionally, functional analysis of ToxA-disrupted mutants and their interaction with the wheat Tsn1 gene indicated a role of ToxA in inducing a susceptible plant response for both P. tritici-repentis and S. nodorum. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that tan spot in comparison with S. nodorum leaf blotch was described in wheat only. The first records about tan spot as an occasional pathogen of wheat date from 1928. However, only in 1942 the typical necrotic symptoms were described. In contrast, S. nodorum leaf blotch was known as an important wheat disease already since 1889. This strongly suggests that an interspecific gene transfer between S. nodorum and P. triticii-repentis indeed has occurred and it happened most likely around 1942. Analysis of the S. nodorum genome sequence shows that interspecific horizontal gene transfer is not a rare and exotic mechanism, but the significant contributor to the pathogen adaptation. Clearly, the application of genomic tools in pathogenomics has resulted in findings highly relevant for wheat resistance breeding.
3 Conclusions
Global food security strongly depends on a highly productive and sustainable agriculture. Fungal pathogens can cause severe yield losses in all major crops and are a serious threat for food security, especially in developing countries. Breeding for resistant wheat varieties is the most effective strategy to counteract these diseases, requiring however a better understanding of the molecular basis of disease resistance. The genetic complexity of wheat greatly complicates gene isolation and functional characterization, explaining the limited number of so far characterized resistance genes in wheat. Major race-specific resistance genes can provide plants with a high level of disease resistance. However, biotrophic fungi such as the powdery mildews are rapidly evolving pathogens which are able to overcome these resistance genes. Thus, new sources of genetic resistance have to be identified in order to avoid an erosion of the current pool of agriculturally important resistance genes.
Molecular isolation of the race-specific Pm3 resistance gene provided highly valuable insights in the diversity and evolution of resistance genes. With the help of developed molecular markers and an established functional validation assay, the allele mining strategy could be tested for its efficiency to explore genetic diversity and identify new resistance sources. Indeed, this strategy allowed the isolation of ten functional resistance alleles in addition to the seven genetically known Pm3 alleles, demonstrating the importance of wild landraces and wheat progenitors as valuable genetic resources for resistance as well as the feasibility of the allele mining strategy.
The recent finding that in necrotrophic pathosystems such as S. nodorum, an interaction between a pathogen toxin and a susceptibility host component is required for a successful pathogen invasion, influenced research on the isolation of genes providing resistance to necrotrophic diseases and possibly explains the present limited knowledge thereof. Nevertheless, the awareness of susceptibility genes being required for pathogen establishment allows breeding for cultivars which lack these genes and thus provide higher resistance to necrotrophic fungi.
With the emergence of highly virulent pathogen strains which overcome previously effective resistance genes, disease resistance research is currently expanding towards the isolation of quantitative resistance. Although this type of resistance is often only partial, it was shown to be more durable (Kou and Wang 2010). Cloning of Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 sets a successful example of isolation of quantitative, durable and broad spectrum disease resistance gene. With the isolation of Pm21, providing durable and broad spectrum resistance, it will be possible to gain additional insights into the molecular mechanisms of durable resistance, and also, similarly to Pm3, expand the variation of functional and durable Pm21 alleles. In contrast, durable resistance to S. nodorum is still only poorly investigated and urgently needs further molecular analysis.
References
Abeysekara NS, Friesen TL, Keller B, Faris JD (2009) Identification and characterization of a novel host-toxin interaction in the wheat-Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem. Theor Appl Genet 120:117–126
Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG et al (2004) Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 19:535–544
Arraiano LS, Balaam N, Fenwick PM et al (2009) Contributions of disease resistance and escape to the control of septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Plant Pathol 58:910–922
Ayala L, Henry M, van Ginkel M et al (2002) Identification of QTLs for BYDV tolerance in bread wheat. Euphytica 128:249–259
Balter M (2007) Seeking agriculture’s ancient roots. Science 316:1830–1835
Bearchell SJ, Fraaije BA, Shaw MW, Fitt BDL (2005) Wheat archive links long-term fungal pathogen population dynamics to air pollution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:5438–5442
Berry PM, Dawson TP, Harrison PA, Pearson RG (2002) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Global Ecol Biogeogr 11:453–462
Bhullar NK, Street K, Mackay M et al (2009) Unlocking wheat genetic resources for the molecular identification of previously undescribed functional alleles at the Pm3 resistance locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:9519–9524
Bhullar NK, Zhang ZQ, Wicker T, Keller B (2010) Wheat gene bank accessions as a source of new alleles of the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm3: a large scale allele mining project. BMC Plant Biol 10:88
Bostwick DE, Ohm HW, Shaner G (1993) Inheritance of septoria-glume blotch resistance in wheat. Crop Sci 33:439–443
Bougot Y, Lemoine J, Pavoine MT et al (2002) Identification of microsatellite marker associated with Pm3 resistance alleles to powdery in wheat. Plant Breed 121:325–329
Bougot Y, Lemoine J, Pavoine MT et al (2006) A major QTL effect controlling resistance to powdery mildew in winter wheat at the adult plant stage. Plant Breed 125:550–556
Brown JKM, Tellier A (2011) Plant-Parasite Coevolution: Bridging the Gap between Genetics and Ecology. Ann Rev Phytopathol 49:345–367
Brunner S, Hurni S, Streckeisen P et al (2010) Intragenic allele pyramiding combines different specificities of wheat Pm3 resistance alleles. Plant J 64:433–445
Brunner S, Hurni S, Herren G et al (2011) Transgenic Pm3b wheat lines show resistance to powdery mildew in the field. Plant Biotech J 9:897–910
Brunner S, Stirnweis D, Quijano CD et al (2012) Transgenic Pm3 multilines of wheat show increased powdery mildew resistance in the field. Plant Biotech J 10:398–409
Burger JC, Chapman MA, Burke JM (2008) Molecular insights into the evolution of crop plants. Am J Bot 95:13–122
Cannon RJC (1998) The implications of predicted climate change for insect pests in the UK, with emphasis on non-indigenous species. Glob Change Biol 4:785–796
Cao AH, Xing LP, Wang XY et al (2011) Serine/threonine kinase gene Stpk-V, a key member of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm21, confers powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:7727–7732
Chakraborty S, Tiedemann AV, Teng PS (2000) Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases. Environ Pollut 108:317–326
Chantret N, Mingeot D, Sourdille P et al (2001) A major QTL for powdery mildew resistance is stable over time and at two development stages in winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 103:962–971
Charmet G (2011) Wheat domestication: Lessons for the future. C R Biol 334:212–220
Ciuffetti LM, Tuori RP, Gaventa JM (1997) A single gene encodes a selective toxin causal to the development of tan spot of wheat. Plant Cell 9:135–144
Cloutier S, McCallum BD, Loutre C et al (2007) Leaf rust resistance gene Lr1, isolated from bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a member of the large psr567 gene family. Plant Mol Biol 65:93–106
Czembor PC, Arseniuk E, Czaplicki A et al (2003) QTL mapping of partial resistance in winter wheat to Stagonospora nodorum blotch. Genome 46:546–554
Dodds PN, Lawrence GJ, Catanzariti AM et al (2006) Direct protein interaction underlies gene-for-gene specificity and coevolution of the flax resistance genes and flax rust avirulence genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:8888–8893
Douchkov D, Nowara D, Zierold U, Schweizer P (2005) A high-throughput gene-silencing system for the functional assessment of defense-related genes in barley epidermal cells. Mol Plant Microbe Int 18:755–761
Du CC, Nelson LR, McDaniel ME (1999) Diallel analysis of gene effects conditioning resistance to Stagonospora nodorum (Berk.) in wheat. Crop Sci 39:686–690
Duveiller E, Singh RP, Nicol JM (2007) The challenges of maintaining wheat productivity: pests, diseases, and potential epidemics. Euphytica 157:417–430
Dyck PL (1987) The association of a gene for leaf rust resistance with the chromosome—7d suppressor of stem rust resistance in common wheat. Genome 29:467–469
Dyck PL (1991) Genetics of adult-plant leaf rust resistance in Chinese Spring and sturdy wheats. Crop Sci 31:309–311
Dyck PL, Samborskj D, Anderson RG (1966) Inheritance of adult-plant leaf rust resistance derived from common wheat varieties Exchange and Frontana. Can J Genet Cytol 8:665–671
Endresen DTF, Street K, Mackay M et al (2011) Predictive association between biotic stress traits and eco-geographic data for wheat and barley landraces. Crop Sci 51:2036–2055
Faris JD, Friesen TL (2009) Reevaluation of a tetraploid wheat population indicates that the Tsn1-ToxA interaction is the only factor governing Stagonospora nodorum blotch susceptibility. Phytopathol 99:906–912
Faris JD, Zhang Z, Lu H et al (2010) A unique wheat disease resistance-like gene governs effector-triggered susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:13544–13549
Feuillet C, Travella S, Stein N et al (2003) Map-based isolation of the leaf rust disease resistance gene Lr10 from the hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:15253–15258
Flor HH (1955) Host-parasite interaction in flax rust—its genetics and other implications. Phytopathol 45:680–685
Francki MG, Shankar M, Walker E et al (2011) New quantitative trait loci in wheat for flag leaf resistance to Stagonospora nodorum blotch. Phytopathol 101:1278–1284
Fried PM, Meister E (1987) Inheritance of leaf and head resistance of winter-wheat to Septoria-nodorum in a diallel cross. Phytopathol 77:1371–1375
Friesen TL, Stukenbrock EH, Liu Z et al (2006) Emergence of a new disease as a result of interspecific virulence gene transfer. Nature Genet 38:953–956
Friesen TL, Meinhardt SW, Faris JD (2007) The Stagonospora nodorum-wheat pathosystem involves multiple proteinaceous host-selective toxins and corresponding host sensitivity genes that interact in an inverse gene-for-gene manner. Plant J 51:681–692
Fu DL, Uauy C, Distelfeld A et al (2009) A kinase-START gene confers temperature-dependent resistance to wheat stripe rust. Science 323:1357–1360
Ge YF, Johnson JW, Roberts JJ, Rajaram S (1998) Temperature and resistance gene interactions in the expression of resistance to Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. Euphytica 99:103–109
Griffey CA, Das MK (1994) Inheritance of adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Knox—62 and Massey winter wheats. Crop Sci 34:641–646
Hane JK, Lowe RGT, Solomon PS et al (2007) Dothideomycete-plant interactions illuminated by genome sequencing and EST analysis of the wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum. Plant Cell 19:3347–3368
Hartl L, Weiss H, Zeller FJ et al (1993) Use of RFLP markers for the identification of alleles of the Pm3 locus conferring powdery mildew resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 86:959–963
He R, Chang Z, Yang Z et al (2009) Inheritance and mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm43 introgressed from Thinopyrum intermedium into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 118:1173–1180
Heun M, Friebe B, Bushuk W (1990) Chromosomal location of the powdery mildew resistance gene of Amigo wheat. Phytopathol 80:1129–1133
Horbach R, Navarro-Quesada AR, Knogge W, Deising HB (2011) When and how to kill a plant cell: Infection strategies of plant pathogenic fungi. J Plant Physiol 168:51–62
Hua W, Liu Z, Zhu J et al (2009) Identification and genetic mapping of Pm42, a new recessive wheat powdery mildew resistance gene derived from wild emmer (Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides). Theor Appl Genet 119:223–230
Huang L, Brooks SA, Li WL et al (2003) Map-based cloning of leaf rust resistance gene Lr21 from the large and polyploid genome of bread wheat. Genetics 164:655–664
Huang J, Zhao Z, Song F, Wang X et al (2012) Molecular detection of a gene effective against powdery mildew in the wheat cultivar Liangxing 66. Mol Breeding 30:1737–1745
Kaur N, Street K, Mackay M et al (2008) Molecular approaches for characterization and use of natural disease resistance in wheat. Europ J Plant Pathol 121:387–397
Keller M, Keller B, Schachermayr G et al (1999) Quantitative trait loci for resistance against powdery mildew in a segregating wheat x spelt population. Theor Appl Genet 98:903–912
Kleijer G, Bronnimann A, Fossati A (1977) Chromosomal location of a dominant gene for resistance at seedling stage to Septoria-nodorum berk in wheat variety Atlas—66. J Plant Breed 78:170–173
Koltin Y, Kenneth R (1970) Role of sexual stage in over-summering of Erysiphe-graminis dc fsp hordei marchal under semi-arid conditions. Ann Appl Biol 65:263–268
Kou Y, Wang S (2010) Broad-spectrum and durability: understanding of quantitative disease resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:181–185
Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W et al (2009) A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323:1360–1363
Kumar GR, Sakthivel K, Sundaram RM et al (2010) Allele mining in crops: Prospects and potentials. Biotech Adv 28:451–461
Lan C, Liang S, Wang Z et al (2009) Quantitative trait loci mapping for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in Chinese wheat cultivar Bainong 64. Phytopathol 99:1121–1126
Liang SS, Suenaga K, He ZH et al (2006) Quantitative trait loci mapping for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in bread wheat. Phytopathol 96:784–789
Lillemo M, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J et al (2007) Leaf rust resistance gene LR34 is involved in powdery mildew resistance of CIMMYT bread wheat line Saar. Wheat Production in Stressed Environments 12:97–102
Lillemo M, Asalf B, Singh RP et al (2008) The adult plant rust resistance loci Lr34/Yr18 and Lr46/Yr29 are important determinants of partial resistance to powdery mildew in bread wheat line Saar. Theor Appl Genet 116:1155–1166
Liu Z, Friesen TL, Ling H et al (2006) The Tsn1-ToxA interaction in the wheat-Stagonospora nodorum pathosystem parallels that of the wheat-tan spot system. Genome 49:1265–1273
Liu Z, Zhang Z, Faris JD et al (2012) The cysteine rich necrotrophic effector SnTox1 produced by Stagonospora nodorum triggers susceptibility of wheat lines harboring Snn1. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002467
Liu ZH, Faris JD, Meinhardt SW et al (2004a) Genetic and physical mapping of a gene conditioning sensitivity in wheat to a partially purified host-selective toxin produced by Stagonospora nodorum. Phytopathol 94:1056–1060
Liu ZH, Friesen TL, Rasmussen JB et al (2004b) Quantitative trait loci analysis and mapping of seedling resistance to Stagonospora nodorum leaf blotch in wheat. Phytopathol 94:1061–1067
Lorang JM, Sweat TA, Wolpert TJ (2007) Plant disease susceptibility conferred by a “resistance” gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:14861–14866
Luck J, Spackman M, Freeman A et al (2011) Climate change and diseases of food crops. Plant Pathol 60:113–121
Luo PG, Luo HY, Chang ZJ et al (2009) Characterization and chromosomal location of Pm40 in common wheat: a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew derived from Elytrigia intermedium. Theor Appl Genet 118:1059–1064
Ma H, Hughes GR (1995) Genetic-control and chromosomal location of Triticum timopheevii-derived resistance to Septoria nodorum blotch in durum-wheat. Genome 38:332–338
Ma ZQ, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD (1994) RFLP markers linked to powdery mildew resistance gene Pm1, Pm2, Pm3 and Pm4 in wheat. Genome 37:871–875
McCouch SR, Sweeney M, Li JM et al (2007) Through the genetic bottleneck: O. rufipogon as a source of trait-enhancing alleles for O. sativa. Euphytica 154:317–339
McDonald MC, Oliver RP, Friesen TL, Brunner PC, McDonald BA (2013) Global diversity and distribution of three necrotrophic effectors in Phaeosphaeria nodorum and related species. New Phytol doi: 10.1111/nph.12257
McIntosh RA (1992) Close genetic-linkage of genes conferring adult-plant resistance to leaf rust and stripe rust in wheat. Plant Pathol 41:523–527
Mendgen K, Hahn M (2002) Plant infection and the establishment of fungal biotrophy. Trends Plant Sci 7:352–356
Mengiste T (2012) Plant immunity to necrotrophs. Ann Rev Phytopathol 50:267–294
Mingeot D, Chantret N, Baret PV et al (2002) Mapping QTL involved in adult plant resistance to powdery mildew in the winter wheat line RE714 in two susceptible genetic backgrounds. Plant Breed 121:133–140
Mundt CC (2002) Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Ann Rev Phytopathol 40:381–410
Murphy NEA, Loughman R, Wilson R et al (2000) Resistance to septoria nodorum blotch in the Aegilops tauschii accession RL5271 is controlled by a single gene. Euphytica 113:227–233
Nagy ED, Lee T-C, Ramakrishna W et al (2007) Fine mapping of the Pc locus of Sorghum bicolor, a gene controlling the reaction to a fungal pathogen and its host-selective toxin. Theor Appl Genet 114:961–970
Newton AC, Johnson SN, Gregory PJ (2011) Implications of climate change for diseases, crop yields and food security. Euphytica 179:3–18
Oberhaensli S, Parlange F, Buchmann JP et al (2011) Comparative sequence analysis of wheat and barley powdery mildew fungi reveals gene colinearity, dates divergence and indicates host-pathogen co-evolution. Fung Genet Biol 48:327–334
Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schoenbeck F, Weber A (1994) Crop production and crop protection: Estimated losses in major food and cash crops. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam
Olesen JE, Mortensen JV, Jorgensen LN, Andersen MN (2000) Irrigation strategy, nitrogen application and fungicide control in winter wheat on a sandy soil. I. Yield, yield components and nitrogen uptake. J Agricult Sci 134:1–11
Oliver RP, Solomon PS (2010) New developments in pathogenicity and virulence of necrotrophs. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:415–419
Oliver RP, Friesen TL, Faris JD, Solomon PS (2012) Stagonospora nodorum: From Pathology to Genomics and Host Resistance. Ann Rev Phytopathol 50:23–43
Panstruga R (2003) Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:320–326
Peng JH, Sun D, Nevo E (2011) Domestication evolution, genetics and genomics in wheat. Molecular Breed 28:281–301
Perfect SE, Green JR (2001) Infection structures of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal plant pathogens. Mol Plant Pathol 2:101–108
Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J et al (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agr Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20
Qiu JW, Schurch AC, Yahiaoui N et al (2007) Physical mapping and identification of a candidate for the leaf rust resistance gene Lr1 of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 115:159–168
Schnurbusch T, Paillard S, Fossati D et al (2003) Detection of QTLs for Stagonospora glume blotch resistance in Swiss winter wheat. Theor App Genet 107:1226–1234
Schweizer P, Pokorny J, Abderhalden O, Dudler R (1999) A transient assay system for the functional assessment of defense-related genes in wheat. Mol Plant Microbe Int 12:647–654
Scott PR, Benedikz PW, Cox CJ (1982) A genetic-study of the relationship between height, time of ear emergence and resistance to Septoria-nodorum in wheat. Plant Pathol 31:45–60
Shaner G (1973) Evaluation of slow-mildewing resistance of Knox wheat in field. Phytopathol 63:867–872
Sharma AK, Sharma RK, Babu KS (2004) Effect of planting options and irrigation schedules on development of powdery mildew and yield of wheat in the North Western plains of India. Crop Prot 23:249–253
Sharma S, Khan TA, Ashraf MS (2011) Studies on powdery mildew disease of mulberry (Morus alba): a new report from Uttar Pradesh, India. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44:105–112
Shaw MW, Bearchell SJ, Fitt BDL, Fraaije BA (2008) Long-term relationships between environment and abundance in wheat of Phaeosphaeria nodorum and Mycosphaerella graminicola. New Phytol 177:229–238
Singh RP (1992) Association between gene Lr34 for leaf rust resistance and leaf tip necrosis in wheat. Crop Sci 32:874–878
Spanu PD, Abbott JC, Amselem J et al (2010) Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism. Science 330:1543–1546
Spielmeyer W, McIntosh RA, Kolmer J, Lagudah ES (2005) Powdery mildew resistance and Lr34/Yr18 genes for durable resistance to leaf and stripe rust cosegregate at a locus on the short arm of chromosome 7D of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 111:731–735
Srichumpa P, Brunner S, Keller B, Yahiaoui N (2005) Allelic series of four powdery mildew resistance genes at the Pm3 locus in hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Physiol 139:885–895
Stukenbrock EH, McDonald BA (2007) Geographical variation and positive diversifying selection in the host-specific toxin SnToxA. Mol Plant Pathol 8:321–332
Stukenbrock EH, Banke S, McDonald BA (2006) Global migration patterns in the fungal wheat pathogen Phaeosphaeria nodorum. Mol Ecol 15:2895–2904
Tan K-C, Ferguson-Hunt M, Rybak K et al (2012) Quantitative variation in effector activity of ToxA isoforms from Stagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Mol Plant Microbe Int 25:515–522
Tommasini L, Yahiaoui N, Srichumpa P, Keller B (2006) Development of functional markers specific for seven Pm3 resistance alleles and their validation in the bread wheat gene pool. Theor Appl Genet 114:165–175
Tucker DM, Griffey CA, Liu S et al (2007) Confirmation of three quantitative trait loci conferring adult plant resistance to powdery mildew in two winter wheat populations. Euphytica 155:1–13
Varshney RK, Nayak SN, May GD, Jackson SA (2009) Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol 27:522–530
Waters ODC, Lichtenzveig J, Rybak K et al (2011) Prevalence and importance of sensitivity to the Stagonospora nodorum necrotrophic effector SnTox3 in current Western Australian wheat cultivars. Crop Pasture Science 62:556–562
Wicker T, Oberhaensli S, Parlange F et al (2013) The wheat powdery mildew genome shows the unique evolution of an obligate biotroph. Nat Genet 45:1092–1096
Wicker T, Yahiaoui N, Keller B (2007) Contrasting rates of evolution in Pm3 loci from three wheat species and rice. Genetics 177:1207–1216
Wolfe MS (1984) Trying to understand and control powdery mildew. Plant Pathol (Oxford) 33:451–466
Xu W, Li C, Hu L, Wang H et al (2011) Identification and molecular mapping of PmHNK54: a novel powdery mildew resistance gene in common wheat. Plant Breed 130:603–607
Xu XY, Bai GH, Carver BF et al (2006) Molecular characterization of a powdery mildew resistance gene in wheat cultivar Suwon 92. Phytopathol 96:496–500
Yahiaoui N, Brunner S, Keller B (2006) Rapid generation of new powdery mildew resistance genes after wheat domestication. Plant J 47:85–98
Yahiaoui N, Kaur N, Keller B (2009) Independent evolution of functional Pm3 resistance genes in wild tetraploid wheat and domesticated bread wheat. Plant J 57:846–856
Yahiaoui N, Srichumpa P, Dudler R, Keller B (2004) Genome analysis at different ploidy levels allows cloning of the powdery mildew resistance gene Pm3b from hexaploid wheat. Plant J 37:528–538
Zeller FJ, Lutz J, Stephan U (1993) Chromosome location of genes for resistance to powdery mildew in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) 1. Mlk and other alleles at the Pm3 locus. Euphytica 68:223–229
Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH et al (2000) Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 406:718–722
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selter, L., Shatalina, M., Singla, J., Keller, B. (2014). Identification and Implementation of Resistance: Genomics-Assisted use of Genetic Resources for Breeding Against Powdery Mildew and Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch in Wheat. In: Tuberosa, R., Graner, A., Frison, E. (eds) Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7575-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7575-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7574-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7575-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)