Abstract
Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms (PENs) are a group of rare tumors thought to arise from the endocrine cells of the pancreas. These tumors may be functional (hormone producing), or non functional. They have a wide range of presenting symptoms. Recent research efforts have shown the complex biology of these tumors, and have started to uncover the molecular alterations responsible for the genesis of these neoplasms. In this chapter we give an overview of the molecular tests available to detect such alterations, and of their diagnostic and prognostic significance.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms
- Pancreatic endocrine tumors/carcinomas
- Classifications of PENS
- Molecular genetic
- Islets of Langerhans
14.1 Introduction
The endocrine pancreas is composed of groups of endocrine cells known as islets of Langerhans, which are scattered throughout the organ and in the vicinity of pancreatic ducts [1–3]. The pancreatic islet cell population consists of alpha (α) cells, beta (β) cells, pancreatic polypeptide (PP) cells and delta (δ) cells [4]. Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs) are characterized by diverse clinical presentation and outcome and complex biology. PENs comprise about 2 % of all pancreatic neoplasms [5]. Every year, about 2,500 new PENs are diagnosed [6, 7]. The incidence of PENs is <1 per 100,000 person-years, although autopsy incidence ranges from 0.8 % to 10 % as they often remain clinically silent and undiagnosed [8]. PENs are associated with a better prognosis than exocrine pancreatic cancers, with an overall 5-year patient survival rate of 35–60 % [9]. There has been no strong association between environmental risk and the development of PENs. A recent study found no association with first-hand tobacco exposure or alcohol use [8].
14.2 Functional and Pathologic Classification of PENs
PENs are categorized as functional or nonfunctional. Functional tumors secrete polypeptide hormones such as insulin, gastrin, glucagon, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, adrenal corticotrophic hormone, parathyroid hormone-related peptide, growth hormone, calcitonin, melanocyte-stimulating hormone, vasopressin, and norephinephrine, and elicit a clinically recognizable, hormone-related syndrome. Nonfunctional tumors secrete biologically inactive peptides and do not produce hormone-associated symptoms [10]. Approximately half of all PENs are nonfunctional [7].
Pathologic classification of PENs based on tumor size, proliferative activity (Ki-67 index), angioinvasion, invasion of adjacent organs, the presence or absence of distant metastases, hormone activity and clinical syndromes has been shown to be of some use in predicting the clinical behavior of these neoplasms [7, 11]. However, a better understanding of the molecular diagnostic aspects of these unpredictable neoplasms will contribute to improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and better patient outcome.
Current molecular techniques have shown that the biology of PENs is complex, without a particular biologic pathway driving these clinically challenging neoplasms. These tumors appear to develop in stages with multiple sequential mutations that contribute to ultimate progression to malignancy [12]. Several factors interact in complex ways to influence development, differentiation, secretion and the interaction of PENs with the tumor microenvironment [13]. Major events involved in pancreatic endocrine neoplasm initiation, progression and distant metastasis include basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), fragile histidine triad (FHIT), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1, neurofibromin), nerve growth factor (NGF), parathyroid adenoma–related protein (PRAD-1), transforming growth factor (TGF), tuberous sclerosis genes 1 and 2 (TSC1, TSC2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) genes.
14.3 Hereditary Syndromes Associated with PENs
The multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes associated with PENs include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1 gene), von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL gene), neurofibromatosis (NF-1 gene), and tuberous sclerosis (TSC1 and TSC2 genes).
14.3.1 Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome, Type 1
Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome, type 1 (MEN-1) is an autosomal dominant familial syndrome first described by Moldawer et al. [14] and Wermer [15]. Clinically, it is characterized by parathyroid adenomas, pancreatic endocrine neoplasms, and pituitary hyperplasia or neoplasia [16]. Other rarer neoplasms include bronchial and thymic carcinoids, adrenocortical tumors and cutaneous lipomas and collagenomas [17]. While hyperparathyroidism is the most common endocrine manifestation of MEN-1, PENs are the second most common endocrine manifestation and occur in about 60 % or more of MEN-1 patients. The majority of PENs in MEN1 are non-functional. However, most common functional entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors in MEN-1 patients are gastrinomas [18, 19], which often occur in the wall of the duodenum and in peri-pancreatic lymph nodes, and also insulinomas. Clustering of subvariants of MEN-1 such as insulinomas [20, 21] and aggressive gastrinomas [22] within small MEN-1 families suggest specific MEN-1 mutations may correlate with specific clinical variants. PENs in MEN-1 syndrome are invariably multifocal and may be widely dispersed in the pancreas and duodenum [18]. Consequently, the role of surgical management becomes particularly challenging and controversial [23, 24]. PENs in MEN-1 may also present as multiple clinically silent entero-pancreatic macroadenomas, which may be found at surgery or at autopsy in almost 100 % of MEN-1 patients older than 40 years [20, 25, 74]. Approximately 80 % of MEN1 cases are familial, whereas 20 % appear to be associated with new mutations based on negative familial history [26].
The MEN1 gene is a tumor suppressor gene [25, 27] mapped to a specific region on the long arm of chromosome 11 (11q13). The gene encodes a nuclear protein called menin, which interacts with several other proteins including junD, a member of the activator protein-1 (AP1) transcription factor family, SMAD1, SMAD3, SMAD5, PEM, NM23, nuclear factor kB and runx2 [28–35]. Mutations in MEN1 gene are the principal genetic abnormality in MEN1 syndrome, seen in most PENs in MEN1 patients and in about one third of sporadic PENs, as an early event in the neoplastic process.
The tumorigenesis in MEN-1 patients is thought to be a two-step inactivation of the MEN1 gene, in which both copies of the MEN1 gene must be inactivated in order for tumorigenesis to occur. A “two-hit” hypothesis has been proposed whereby germline inactivation of one allele is followed by somatic inactivation of the second allele in a predisposed cell, leading to clonal proliferation [36]. Virtually all first hits at the MEN1 gene are small mutations involving one to several bases [37, 38]. Most MEN1 gene mutations occur in the locus of exon 2 [39]. However, hundreds of unique germline and somatic mutations, broadly distributed across the MEN1 open reading frame, have been found [16, 38, 40]. Most of the first-hit mutations predict premature truncation of the menin protein, while other mutations predict missense mutations or replacement of one to three amino acids, all of which result in inactivation or absence of menin protein. The second step in MEN-1 tumorigenesis always occurs in somatic tissue, usually as a postnatal event. The second-hit mutations are usually large chromosomal or subchromosomal rearrangements with a resultant deletion that includes the remaining normal MEN1 gene.
14.3.2 Loss of Heterozygosity at 11q13
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is used mainly to show loss of the normal copy of the MEN1 gene. In MEN-1 patients, LOH at 11q13 was found in almost 100 % of gastrinomas and other pancreatic endocrine tumors, as well as non-pancreatic endocrine neoplasia [41, 42]. Some sporadic endocrine tumors of the type found in MEN-1 show frequent LOH at 11q13. An underlying mutation at 11q13 has been traced to the MEN1 gene in about 50 % of sporadic MEN-1 like tumors with 11q13 LOH. Somatic mutations of the MEN1 gene occur in about 20 % of sporadic solitary PENs [26, 30, 43]. Therefore, MEN1 gene mutations are among the most common mutations in sporadic PENs. Among functional PENs, MEN1 gene mutations occur in about 25 % gastrinomas, 10–20 % insulinomas and 50 % VIPomas [44–47].
14.3.3 Events Following Inactivation of MEN1 Gene
After MEN1 gene inactivation, other unknown genes or undetected mutations in MEN1 gene may contribute to MEN-1 tumor development. Studies suggest that the tumorigenic pathway of MEN-1 overlaps and interacts with other homeostatic cell pathways [48–51]. Multifocal microadenoma is an early monoclonal or oligoclonal islet cell lesion in MEN-1, which may represent a hyperplastic precursor stage to subsequent neoplastic development [52]. Monohormonal endocrine cell clusters (MECCs) develop most frequently within normal pancreatic islets but also in exocrine pancreatic ducts and hyperplastic islets through 11q13 LOH. MECCs progress to microadenomas (MA) with disruption of the normal islet structure and transformation into neoplastic process. Evidence in support of microadenomas in MEN1 patients includes hyperplastic foci of gastrin cells seen by light microscopy in the duodenum of gastrinoma specimens from MEN-1 but not from sporadic gastrinomas [53]. Furthermore, in the heterozygous knockout of the MEN1 gene in mice, giant hyperplastic islets precede the development of insulinoma, suggesting that subtle islet hyperplasia may be an unrecognized precursor lesion in MEN-1 of humans despite the presence of one normal MEN1 allele. One could speculate that hyperplasia is an expression of MEN1 heterozygosity [54, 55].Further studies are needed to link these findings with an as yet undiscovered genetic basis of tumor development.
14.3.4 Von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome
Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system, renal cell carcinomas, retinal angiomas, visceral cysts, pheochromocytomas and PENs, which occur in10–20 % of VHL patients [56–59]. The VHL gene, mapped to chromosome 3p25.3 [60], is a tumor suppressor gene that has an inhibitory effect on transcription elongation and facilitates the proteasome-mediated degradation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) protein [16, 61]. The alpha subunit of HIF-1 is highly sensitive to tissue oxygen levels. In the presence of normal oxygen levels, it is bound by the VHL protein complex and covalently linked to ubiquitin in order to be targeted for degradation. In the absence of the VHL protein, HIF-1 alpha levels increase, leading to overproduction of hypoxia-associated cytokines, including erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor [5, 62–67]. These cytokines have been implicated in tumor growth. However, the precise mechanism of tumorigenesis is unknown. Other factors contributing to tumor pathogenesis may include matrix metalloproteinases such as MMP1 [68, 69]. VEGF inhibition, with resultant inhibition of angiogenesis, is currently under investigation as a potential therapeutic strategy for PENs [70, 71].
The majority of patients present with a germline mutation of the gene from the affected parent and a normal copy of the gene from the unaffected parent. Tumor develops when both alleles are inactivated, usually as the result of a deletion [5]. In one study 12.3 % of 155 patients with VHL went on to develop PENs [72]. Majority of these neoplasms tend to be nonfunctional, and are frequently composed of cells with foamy, clear cytoplasm, similar to clear cells typical of renal cell carcinomas in VHL [41, 73]. LOH of the VHL gene was found in 100 % of PENs (6 of 6 tumors) analyzed by PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism and fluorescent in situ hybridization. All the tumors in this study were nonfunctional [41]. These findings support a role for VHL gene mutation in the formation of VHL-associated PENs. In patients with sporadic PENs, no mutations were found in the VHL gene, although allelic loss on chromosome 3p was found in 33 % of 43 patients with sporadic PENs [74].
14.3.5 Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is a neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by neurofibromas, Lisch nodules on the iris, dermal café-au-lait spots, as well as a variety of endocrine neoplasms, including somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenal wall, pheochromocytomas, hyperparathyroidism, hypothalamic or optic nerve tumors [16] and rarely somatostatinomas of the pancreas [5, 75, 76]. NF-1 is caused by a mutation of the NF-1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 17q11 that code for the protein neurofibromin. Mutations cause the premature truncation of neurofibromin. The precise role of the NF-1 gene in the development of PENs still remains to be elucidated.
14.3.6 Tuberous Sclerosis
Tuberous sclerosis is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome associated with the development of hamartomas and benign tumors in multiple organs, including skin, brain, and kidney. Two gene mutations have been described: TSC1 on 9q34 encoding hamartin [77] and TSC2 on 16p13.3 encoding tuberin, with identification of the tuberous sclerosis gene on chromosome 16 [78]. Together, these proteins function as a tumor suppressor gene complex and control the activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [16]. A complex of hamartin and tuberin is thought to regulate cell-cycle progression, possibly through upregulation of the mTOR cell-signaling pathway [79, 80]. mTOR is an intracellular protein that is key in the control of cell growth, protein synthesis, and autophagy [71] and is involved in the regulation of β-catenin stability and activity [5]. One to five percent of patients with tuberous sclerosis can develop PENs that demonstrate LOH on 16p13.3 or lack of tuberin immunoreactivity [5, 81–83]. Based on these findings, the RADIANT 1 (RAD In Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors) trial, a phase II study, focused on the evaluation of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in patients with advanced PENs who have failed cytotoxic chemotherapy [71].
14.4 Molecular Genetic Analyses in Sporadic PENs
The majorities of PENs are sporadic and lack any association with germline mutations. The genetic aberrations implicated in sporadic PENs are poorly understood. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes that are mutated in common human malignancies (p53, APC, Rb, K-ras) do not appear to be associated with PENs [84–86]. Both within genetic syndromes characterized by PENs and in sporadic PENs, genomic studies have identified specific molecular patterns that characterize individual PENs. In the case of MEN1 associated insulinoma, these molecular abnormalities include gain of function in dlk1, PCNA, TERT, ASK and NFkB [93, 257, 262, 283], and loss of function of menin, p27, p18, JunD and FANCD2 [87–89]. Sporadic insulinomas are characterized by gain in function of cyclD/CDK4, Akt1, Abl, TGFa/EGFR and Bcl2 [193, 194, 263, 263, 264, 265, 266, 277, 280] and loss of function of several proteins, including PTEN, p16, p15 and RKIP [168, 190, 260, 261, 270, 271]. Several of these genes and markers have also been studied in other PENs with variable findings.
14.5 Comparative Genomic Hybridization Studies in PENs
Several studies have used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to identify chromosomal aberrations in PENs. One of the most consistent chromosomal alteration is loss of 11q, which harbors the MEN1 gene [90]. Zikusoka et al. [81] compared six studies using comparative genomic hybridization to detect gains and losses in various chromosomes in PENs. The most frequent gains were on chromosomes 7 and 20. The most frequent losses were on chromosomes 2, 6q, 21q, and Y. Chromosomal aberrations associated most frequently with malignant behavior and metastasis included gains of chromosomes 7, 14q, 4, and Xq, as well as losses of chromosomes 6p, 3p, 6q, and 21q [91–93]. Male patients with malignant insulinomas have been reported to show loss of Y chromosome and gain of Xp [75, 91]. Similarly, PENs in females have been shown to exhibit loss of X chromosome [75]. Furthermore, loss of sex chromosome has been associated with metastatic disease, local invasion and poor patient survival [75]. Other chromosomal aberrations identified in PENs include gains of chromosomes 19, 5, 14p, 12q, 17, 20q, 15, 18, 9q, and 17p, as well as losses of chromosomes 1p, 6, 11q, 3q, 11p, and Xq [91, 92, 94–97]. Overall, nonfunctional PENs contained more genetic aberrations than functional PENs [91], metastases had a higher average number of chromosomal aberrations than matched primaries [94] and 11q losses and 7q gains were reported in multiple studies, supporting their role in the development of PENs.
14.6 Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) Studies in PENs
LOH analysis is a powerful molecular tool used to identify tumor suppressor gene loci that are involved in the formation and progression of neoplasms, including PENs. An LOH frequency greater than 35 % at a specific chromosomal locus exceeds the rates of random genomic instability and strongly suggests a relevant tumor suppressor gene at that locus [98, 99]. A technical advantage with LOH is that it can detect even smaller chromosomal deletions that could be missed by CGH. Several chromosomal aberrations have been identified in sporadic PENs. Using LOH, most common abnormalities are found in chromosomes 1, 3 and 6. LOH at chromosome 1 was found in 34 % of PETs and was found to be more common in tumors with hepatic metastasis [100, 101]. Chen et al. [102] identified chromosome 1 LOH on 1q31–32 and 1q21–23 in almost half of the gastrinomas studied and found an association with aggressive growth, liver metastasis and post-surgical recurrence of liver metastasis, suggesting a worse prognosis for patients with chromosome 1 aberrations. Overall, 56 % of 273 metatsatic PENs analyzed in several different studies were found to show various chromosomal aberrations, especially in chromosomes 1, 3, 6, X and Y, as opposed to 39 % of 264 non-metastatic PENs [75, 91, 98, 100, 102–109]. These data point toward a potential association between chromosomal aberrations and progression of PENs.
Chromosome 3 is the location of the vHL gene (3p25.3) [60], which has been associated with vHL syndrome-associated PENs. Recent studies have shown LOH at loci proximal to vHL locus [103] and LOH at 3p14.2–3p21 loci occur more often in malignant insulinomas than in benign insulinomas. Barghorn et al. [104] found highly statistically significant increased frequency of LOH at 3p25.3–p23 in malignant as compared to benign PENs, and in metastasizing as compared to non-metastasizing PENs. Additionally, a strong correlation was found between the loss of alleles on chromosome 3p and clinically metastatic PENs. These findings suggest a tumor suppressor gene at 3p25.3–p23 that may be associated with sporadic PEN development and that losses of larger centromeric regions are associated with metastatic progression. In another study, LOH at 3q was found in half of sporadic PENs with hepatic metastases, while PENs without hepatic metastasis showed no LOH at this location [105]. Microsatellite markers demonstrate the smallest common deleted region at 3q27-qter, the region of p51 (a member of the p53 tumor suppressor family) [110]. These findings are suggestive of a late event in the molecular pathogenesis of PENs, consistent with advanced stage of tumor development [81].
LOH detected chromosomal loss at 6q in 6 % of sporadic PENs overall and in 100 % of insulinomas, suggesting a chromosomal aberration specific to insulinomas [91]. Additional findings were smallest regions of allelic deletions at 6q22 (50 %) and 6q23–24 (41.2–56.3 %). Also, more chromosome 6 aberrations were detected by FISH in metastatic relative to benign PENs [106]. Thus, chromosome 6 alterations may play a specific role in the molecular pathogenesis and progression of insulinomas. LOH at chromosomal arm 9p, the home of p16, is a frequent finding in PENs. However, Moore et al. [111] found a p16 mutation in only one insulinoma out of 41 PENs, none of which showed methylation. Current studies seem to indicate that p16 inactivation by promoter methylation may be restricted to functional gastrinomas. Rare homozygous p16 gene deletions have also been reported in PENs [107]. Using CGH, Speel et al. [93] found 9q gain to be the most common gain in insulinomas (50 %).
The tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, is located at chromosome 10q23 [112] performed a mutation analysis of the entire coding region of PTEN in 33 PENs and found only one tumor with a somatic mutation in exon 6. However, 10q23 region LOH was detected in more than half of malignant and in none of 7 benign PENs. All samples with LOH at 10q23 were malignant PENs. This suggests that allelic loss of this region could be associated with malignant behavior. In non-neoplastic pancreatic islet cells, immunohistochemical expression of PTEN protein is localized to the nucleus. PTEN expression was lost in the single malignant PEN with two structural hits; however, all of the PENs with LOH remained PTEN-immunoreactive but PTEN was localized predominately in the cytoplasm and cell membrane in 23 of 24 (96 %) PENs. No increase in malignant behavior is associated with this shifting of PTEN from the nucleus but is associated with the neoplastic state in general. Based on the above findings [112] it was proposed that inappropriate compartmentalization of PTEN (cytoplasmic as opposed to nuclear localization of PTEN) could be an initiating event in the genesis of PENs, whereas physical loss of 10q leads to progressive malignancy.
Chromosome 11q13, discussed previously, is associated with MEN1 and the development of most MEN1-associated PENs as well as some sporadic PENs. Chromosome 11p13–15 was studied in a comparative genomic hybridization investigation of 25 PENs from 23 patients. 11p13–15 loss was found in 24 % of cases, likely representing uncharacterized tumor suppressor genes in this region [94]. Chromosome 11q23 harbors the tumor suppressor gene succinate dehydrogenase subunit D (SDHD) [113]. A number of studies have shown significant allelic loss of 11q extending to 11q23, or distal to 11q13, and have thus postulated that a previously unrecognized tumor suppressor in this region plays a role in PEN development [47, 91, 108]. Chromosome 12p12 is the location of the K-ras gene, which is commonly mutated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas but is found only rarely in PENs [111], supporting the idea that exocrine and endocrine pancreatic neoplasms involve different genetic pathways. Chromosome 17p13 is home to TP53, which plays a significant role in the tumorigenesis of pancreatic ductal carcinomas, but not PENs. A study by Moore et al. [114] supported previous suggestions that the presence of a tumor suppressor gene other than TP53 on chromosomal arm 17p is involved in the molecular pathogenesis of nonfunctional PENs.
Chromosome 18q21 mutations may play a role in the molecular pathogenesis of nonfunctional PENs, whereas select functional tumors lack this change [115]. 18q21 is the location of the DPC4/Smad4 gene, a cell cycle regulator [116]. However, in another series of PENs, these chromosomal aberrations were not detected in any of the 19 nonfunctional PENs analyzed [117]. Chromosome 22 was studied in gastrinomas, insulinomas, VIPomas, and nonfunctional PENs, and LOH was found on chromosome 22q in 22 of 23 tumors [109]. Another study found LOH in 57 % of insulinomas at 22q12.1–q12.2 [118]. This site is the location of the hSNF5/INI1 gene, implicated in medulloblastoma and other pediatric central nervous system tumors [119]. Further studies could not find an alteration in this gene suggesting it is not the cause of tumor development [81, 118]. X chromosome losses were seen in patients with functional and nonfunctional PENs and were associated with shorter patient survival [8] and clinically aggressive behavior [75, 98, 120]. Y chromosome losses were found frequently in PENs from males (36 %) and were associated with metastasis, local invasion, and high proliferation rates [75].
14.7 Cell Cycle Regulars in Sporadic PENs
Regulation of the cell cycle keeps cell death (apoptosis) in balance with cell growth (proliferation). Loss of cell cycle regulation is one of the hallmarks of neoplasia. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of the cell cycle are complex, as multiple, often repetitive pathways may be involved. A number of studies have shown that common cell cycle regulators are involved in the molecular pathogenesis of PENs.
P27KIP1 is a cell kinase inhibitor that opposes cell cycle progression and is located on chromosome 12p12–p13.1 [121]. A study by Guo et al. [122] found overexpression of P27KIP in sporadic PENs. An elevation of P27KIP1 expression was found to be inversely related to Ki-67 in a study of 109 gastroenteropancreatic NETs, suggesting that P27KIP1 may inhibit proliferation in these tumors [123].
Loss of p16INK4/p14ARF, a tumor suppressor gene located on 9p21 [124] l, leads to tumorigenesis as a result of deregulation of p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase/retinoblastoma pathways [125]. Reports found inactivating p16INK4 gene alterations (such as homozygous deletion and methylation at the 5′CpG islands of promoter regions) in 92 % of gastrinomas and nonfunctional PENs. Loss of expression of genes in the 9p21 region was found in 57 % of nonfunctional PENs, 30 % of insulinomas, and 22 % of gastrinomas. This study also found CpG promoter methylation of the p16 gene [126].
Cyclin D1, on chromosome 11q13 [127, 128], plays an important role in cell cycle regulation. Nuclear expression of Cyclin D1 was found to be increased in almost half of the PENs [129]. Sporadic PENs were specifically studied and Cyclin D1 overexpression was found in 65 % (20 out of 31) of the PENs studied compared to normal pancreatic tissue [130]. Pathways associated with Cyclin D1, specifically the P38/mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt/PKB pathways, were activated in PENs, whereas down-regulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway was also found with overexpression of Cyclin D1 [131–133].
Other cell cycle regulators have been studied with controversial results, including the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene initially found to be deleted in insulinomas [134, 135] but without further confirmation [74, 136, 137] and, as mentioned previously DPC4/Smad4 on chromosome 18q21 [116].
Cell cycle regulators studied and found not to be important contributors to PEN development to date include P53 located on chromosome 17p13.1 [114, 138–140], β-catenin located on chromosome 3p21 [141, 142], phospholipase CB3 located on chromosome 11q13 [143], and retinoic acid receptor β located on chromosome 3p24 [144, 145].
14.8 Other Molecular Genetic Abnormalities in Sporadic PENs
PI3K-Akt/PKB pathway participates in the mediation of β-cell mass up-regulation [146–148]. This pathway activates downstream messengers and transcription factors such as PDX-1, Ngn-3, Isl-1, NeuroD/Beta2, and Nkx2.2, known to act during pancreatic embryogenesis. Glucose and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) induce activation of the PI3K-Akt/PKB pathway and promote in vitro proliferation of insulinoma cells [147]. A persistent stimulus that promotes proliferation is seen in other tumors, including the persistence of achlorhydria inducing gastrinomas. Mouse studies found that up-regulation of the PI3K-Akt/PKB pathway is not sufficient for neoplastic transformation [146].
K-RAS2, on chromosome 12p12.1 [149], is an important oncogene that transduces cell growth signals, mutations of which lead to growth factor-independent stimulation of cell proliferation [150]. K-RAS2 mutations were not detected in PENs in a study by Yashiro et al. [151]. Another study found strong K-RAS2 immunoreactivity and mutations in 4 of 6 insulinomas studied [152].
Somatostatin (SST) and G-protein-coupled transmembrane receptors (SSTRs) seem to play a role as regulators of islet cell proliferation [1]. Loss of SST/SSTR signaling may contribute to the genesis of PENs. In support of this theory, MEN-1 studies showed decreased expression of SST and islet amyloid polypeptide in MEN syndrome type 1 [153], providing a link between loss of menin, suppression of SST and islet amyloid polypeptide expression and oncogenesis.
The dominant effect of the protooncogene c-Myc is apoptosis of the islet cells. However, increased expression of c-Myc has been demonstrated in glucose-induced hyperplasia of pancreatic islets. Thus, the effects of this gene depend on the environmental effects and the influences of other genes and proteins. Pelengaris and Khan [154] proposed a model of accumulating mutations leading to progression from hyperplasia to neoplasia. c-Myc is thought to be an early event in hyperplastic islets. c-Myc expression was found to be increased in hyperplastic islets and benign and malignant insulinomas.
RIP-Tag2 oncogene expression in transgenic mice leads to islet cell hyperplasia and neoplasia. Tag oncoprotein inactivates tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb. Decreased apoptosis is also seen due to overexpression of antiapoptotic protein Bcl-XL and Bcl-2. These antiapoptotic proteins counteract the effects of proapoptotic c-Myc [154, 155].
HER-2 neu, found on chromosome 11q21 [156], is a well-known oncogene that is overexpressed in some cases of breast carcinoma and is associated with increased malignant behavior, proliferation, and metastasis [157]. HER-2 neu has been studied in gastrinomas, where its overexpression was found in a minority of these tumors, and was associated with liver metastasis [158].
The CpG island methylation of the estrogen receptor gene (ESR1), located on chromosome 6q24 [159], has also been described in breast carcinoma and has significant therapeutic implications, indicating tamoxifen resistance [160]. Estrogen receptor gene methylation was found in 64 % of PENs in one study [144].
14.9 Molecular Biologic Aspects of PENs
Human MutL homologue 1 (hMLH1), found on chromosome 3p21.3 [161], is a mismatch repair gene. One study found hMLH1 to be hypermethylated in 23 % of PENs with evidence of microsatellite instability [162]. Promoter hypermethylation (gene silencing) was associated with an improved 5-year survival (100 % vs. 56 %).
Telomerase, on chromosome 5p15.33 [163], is an enzyme that maintains the chromosomal telomere. Telomere degradation is a normal part of the cell cycle, but aberrations of telomerase can lead to tumorigenesis [81]. Telomerase activity may predict an unfavorable outcome in PENs [8, 164].
Thrombomodulin, an endothelial anticoagulant, when overexpressed, reduces cellular proliferation and promotes cellular adhesion in vitro, while expression of thrombomodulin in vivo is inversely correlated with metastatic spread [165, 166].
E-cadherin functions to promote cell-cell adhesion. Loss of E-cadherin is associated with invasion and metastasis in many malignancies. Chetty et al. [13] found aberrant E-cadherin expression in more than 50 % of PENs, which strongly correlated with lymph node and liver metastasis. In addition, nuclear E-cadherin was seen in 18/57 cases when stained with antibodies detecting the cytoplasmic fragment of E-cadherin. This is a previously undescribed staining pattern in PENs.
Cell signaling pathways influence tumor growth and hormonal activity. Neuroendocrine cells can express the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and its receptor (IGFR) [167]. Cell line studies indicate that IGF-1 can act in autocrine and paracrine fashion to inhibit apoptosis and stimulate secretion of chromogranins, possibly by activating the P13K-AKT pathway. VEGF is also expressed by neuroendocrine tumors, and elevated levels of VEGF have been associated with tumor progression [168, 169].
14.10 Gene Expression Profiling Studies in PENs
Pancreatic endocrine tumors/carcinomas (PETs/PECAs) are clinically challenging neoplasms. Based on the presence or absence of metastases and/or gross invasion of adjacent organs, they are classified as pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (PECAs) or pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) [WHO-2004] [10]. In the presence of negative metastatic work-up at the time of first tissue diagnosis, it is difficult to predict which of these tumors will become metastatic (‘malignant’) or remain localized to the pancreas (‘benign’). Standard histologic criteria, including grade, tumor size and Ki-67 index, often fail to predict malignant behavior [170]. Patients who develop metastases are rarely cured and 5-year survival rates diminish significantly. Therefore, discovery of molecular markers of prognosis is vitally important in order to quantify the risk of metastatic recurrence in patients with resected primary tumors.
The broad heterogeneity that characterizes neuroendocrine tumors has always posed problems regarding their correct classification [171]. In recent years, several refined histopathologic classification, grading and staging schemes have been proposed for PETs and, to some extent, validated to categorize these heterogeneous neoplasms into various diagnostic and prognostic subgroups [10, 11, 172–179]. However, due primarily to the diverse biology of these rare neoplasms, there is no single internationally acceptable prognostic scheme that would allow accurate determination of prognosis in a particular case.
In order to identify newer diagnostic, prognostic markers and therapeutic targets, lately there has been an increasing application of high-throughput technologies, including gene expression profiling, to the study of pancreatic endocrine tumors [153, 180–185]. Genes that have been associated with malignant behavior in human PENs include VEGF-C [186], met proto-oncogene, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) [187], MEN-1 gene [188], c-N-ras, HER-2/neu [158] and c-myc, TGF-alpha, c-K-ras and p53 [152]. Most of these studies were conducted on small numbers of specimens and have not been fully validated. In a recent study [182], gene expression profiles of primary PECAs and their hepatic metastases were found to be similar, suggesting that most genetic abnormalities accumulate at the level of primary PETs. Therefore, identification of a set of genes and/or their protein products in the primary tumor tissue in clinically localized pancreatic endocrine tumors (CLP-PET), may have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications. Clinical utility of a metastasis-associated gene (MAG) signature as a predictor of future metastases has been shown in breast [189] and prostate [190] cancers and in medulloblastoma [191]. However, molecular markers of progression in primary pancreatic endocrine tumors are largely unknown.
Gene expression profiling using microarray analysis has identified a number of genes typical of PENs [153, 182, 186, 187, 192]. Similarly, histologically normal pancreatic islets were compared with PENs, showing overexpression of 66 genes, especially IGFBP3 (a growth factor), fibronectin (a cell migration/adhesion molecule), and oncogenes like MLLT10/AF10. One hundred and nineteen genes were underexpressed, including p21CIP1 (a cell cycle regulator), JunD (a transcription factor), and NME3 (a metastasis suppressor gene). Another gene expression study compared normal islet cells and three neuroendocrine tumor cell lines; 667 genes were up-regulated, and 323 were down-regulated [182, 192].
Recently, we selected pathologically well-characterized subsets of frozen PEN tissues and adjacent histologically normal pancreatic islets, and used a comprehensive genome-wide expression profiling approach and discovered a novel set of candidate progression genes (CPGs) that were differentially expressed in surgically resected metastatic primary (MP)-PECAs relative to clinically localized primary (CLP)-PETs [193–195]. Many of these genes, including RUNX1T, palladin, insulin receptor, CD24 antigen and NRCAM had not previously been associated with progression in PENs. We have successfully validated two of our leading candidate progression genes (RUNX1T1, palladin) at the protein level using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on larger independent test sets of MP-PECAs and CLP-PETs [196, 197]. We are now focused to advance our discovery of novel molecular markers (CPGs) to the next step of larger scale clinical validation, using the roadmaps proposed in recent literature with regard to the discovery and validation of gene-based biomarkers. Although gene expression profiling studies have identified newer candidate genes that are providing newer insights into the molecular pathology and biology of PENs, comparison among these published studies continues to be a challenge due to variations in study designs, patient populations investigated, and tumor samples analyzed.
14.11 Summary
A large number of studies have contributed significantly to our current understanding of molecular pathology and diagnosis of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. PENs exhibit a diverse spectrum of molecular genetic aberrations similar to their broad clinical presentation. Nonfunctional PENs exhibit more molecular aberrations than functional PENs. Also, malignant behavior seems to be associated with increasing genetic aberrations, suggesting specific genes may be associated with metastases in PENs. Genome wide studies have identified several genetic abnormalities in PENs, some of which predict malignant behavior in various subtypes of PENs and adverse clinical outcome while others provide molecular evidence in support of earlier stages of neoplastic transformation of PENs. Comparative genomic hybridization studies found that most frequent chromosomal gains were on chromosomes 7 and 20. The most frequent losses were on chromosomes 2, 6q, 21q, and Y. The chromosome aberrations most frequently associated with metastasis included gains of chromosomes 7, 14q, 4, and Xq, as well as losses of chromosomes 6p, 3p, 6q, and 21q. LOH analyses have identified multiple tumor suppressor gene loci that contribute to the pathogenesis of PENs. Genetic syndromes, which include PENs as one of their components, allow for the identification of genes associated with the genesis of PENs, including MEN1, vHL, NF-1, TSC1 and TSC2. Gene expression profiling using microarray analyses has identified a large number of genes differentially expressed in PENs when compared with normal islets, suggesting their involvement in initiation or progression of PENs. These include IGFBP3, fibronectin, oncogene MLLT10/AF10, p21C1P1, JunD, NME3, RUNX1T1, paladin and p21. While these studies are providing critical scientific evidence to refine our understanding of the molecular complexity of these neoplasms, pooling of large data sets and comparison among these molecular studies is challenging because of variations in study designs, patient populations, and tumor samples (fresh-frozen versus archival) and variation in the technical platforms used. A number of interesting lines of investigation are lending credence to various hypotheses regarding the molecular pathogenesis, progression and therapeutic responsiveness of PENs. Some the recent studies have focused on cathepsins, CD44, NESP-55, hMLH1, telomerase, thrombomodulin, and E-cadherin expression/activity. Advanced molecular testing, is currently making it more feasible to pursue newer lines of genetic studies to unravel an increasing number of chromosomal aberrations associated with PENs. Multiple molecular alterations, involving cell migratory, cell cycle and angiogenic functions have been found to promote PEN development, growth, invasion, and metastases. As a result of these studies, phase III trials of novel therapies targeting cell regulators such as mTOR, VEGF and other targets have been completed. Focused investigation of various mediators/mechanisms implicated in the molecular pathogenesis and progression of PENs will contribute to novel diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive strategies. These efforts need to be integrated with the development and validation of robust assays for prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can be used in the clinic. All of these efforts will ultimately translate into more efficacious, safer and cost-effective therapeutic and monitoring options for patients with PENs.
Abbreviations
- AP1:
-
Activator protein-1
- bFGF:
-
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- CLP-PET:
-
Clinically localized pancreatic endocrine tumors
- CPGs:
-
Candidate progression genes
- EFR1:
-
Estrogen receptor gene
- FHIT:
-
Fragile histidine triad
- hMLH1:
-
Human MutL homologue
- IGF:
-
Insulin-like growth factor
- IGFBP-3:
-
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3
- IHC:
-
Immunohistochemistry
- LOH:
-
Loss of heterozygosity
- MAG:
-
Metastasis-associated gene
- MECC:
-
Monohormonal endocrine cell clusters
- MEN1:
-
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1
- MP:
-
Metastatic primary
- mTOR:
-
Mammalian target of rapamycin
- NF1:
-
Neuofibromatosis type 1
- NGF:
-
Nerve growth factor
- PECAs:
-
Pancreatic endocrine carcinomas
- PENS:
-
Pancreatic endocrine neoplasm
- PETs:
-
Pancreatic endocrine tumors
- PRAD-1:
-
Parathyroid adenoma-related protein
- SDHD:
-
Succinate dehydrogenase subunit D
- SST:
-
Somatostatin
- SSTRs:
-
G-protein-coupled transmembrane receptors
- TGF:
-
Transforming growth factor
- TSC1, TSC2:
-
Tuberous sclerosis genes 1 & 2
- VHL:
-
von Hippel-Lindau genes
References
Ballian N, Hu M, Liu SH, Brunicardi FC (2007) Proliferation, hyperplasia, neogenesis, and neoplasia in the islets of Langerhans. Pancreas 35(3):199–206
Pour PM, Pandey KK, Batra SK (2003) What is the origin of pancreatic adenocarcinoma? Mol Cancer 2:13
Schmied BM, Ulrich AB, Friess H, Buchler MW, Pour PM (2001) The patterns of extrainsular endocrine cells in pancreatic cancer. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 21(1):69–81
Grube D, Bohn R (1983) The microanatomy of human islets of Langerhans, with special reference to somatostatin (D-) cells. Arch Histol Jpn 46(3):327–353
Mittendorf EA, Shifrin AL, Inabnet WB, Libutti SK, McHenry CR, Demeure MJ (2006) Islet cell tumors. Curr Probl Surg 43(10):685–765
Rindi G, Capella C, Solcia E (2000) Introduction to a revised clinicopathological classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Q J Nucl Med 44(1):13–21
Goldin SB, Aston J, Wahi MM (2008) Sporadically occurring functional pancreatic endocrine tumors: review of recent literature. Curr Opin Oncol 20(1):25–33
Halfdanarson TR, Rubin J, Farnell MB, Grant CS, Petersen GM (2008) Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: epidemiology and prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 15(2):409–427
Tomassetti P, Campana D, Piscitelli L, Casadei R, Santini D, Nori F et al (2005) Endocrine pancreatic tumors: factors correlated with survival. Ann Oncol 16(11):1806–1810
Heitz P, Komminoth P, Perren A, Klimstra D, Dayal Y, Bordi C et al (2004) Tumors of the endocrine pancreas. IARC Press, Lyon
Heymann MF, Joubert M, Nemeth J, Franc B, Visset J, Hamy A et al (2000) Prognostic and immunohistochemical validation of the capella classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: an analysis of 82 sporadic cases. Histopathology 36(5):421–432
Calender A (2000) Molecular genetics of neuroendocrine tumors. Digestion 62(Suppl 1):3–18
Chetty R (2008) An overview of practical issues in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132(8):1285–1289
Moldawer MP, Nardi GL, Raker JW (1954) Concomitance of multiple adenomas of the parathyroids and pancreatic islets with tumor of the pituitary: a syndrome with a familial incidence. Am J Med Sci 228(2):190–206
Wermer P (1954) Genetic aspects of adenomatosis of endocrine glands. Am J Med 16(3):363–371
Kronenberg H, Melmeds S, Polonsky K, Larson P (2008) Williams textbook of endocrinology, 11th edn. Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia
Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, Bilezikian JP, Beck-Peccoz P, Bordi C et al (2001) Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(12):5658–5671, Epub 2001/12/12
Marx SJ, Agarwal SK, Kester MB, Heppner C, Kim YS, Skarulis MC et al (1999) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: clinical and genetic features of the hereditary endocrine neoplasias. Recent Prog Horm Res 54:397–438, discussion −9. Epub 1999/11/05
Pipeleers-Marichal M, Somers G, Willems G, Foulis A, Imrie C, Bishop AE et al (1990) Gastrinomas in the duodenums of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. N Engl J Med 322(11):723–727, Epub 1990/03/15
Skogseid B, Eriksson B, Lundqvist G, Lorelius LE, Rastad J, Wide L et al (1991) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a 10-year prospective screening study in four kindreds. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73(2):281–287
Gaitan D, Loosen PT, Orth DN (1993) Two patients with Cushing’s disease in a kindred with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76(6):1580–1582
Burgess JR, Greenaway TM, Parameswaran V, Challis DR, David R, Shepherd JJ (1998) Enteropancreatic malignancy associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: risk factors and pathogenesis. Cancer 83(3):428–434
Norton JA, Fraker DL, Alexander HR, Venzon DJ, Doppman JL, Serrano J et al (1999) Surgery to cure the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. N Engl J Med 341(9):635–644, Epub 1999/08/26
Thompson NW (1998) Current concepts in the surgical management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 pancreatic-duodenal disease. Results in the treatment of 40 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, hypoglycaemia or both. J Intern Med 243(6):495–500
Majewski JT, Wilson SD (1979) The MEA-I syndrome: an all or none phenomenon? Surgery 86(3):475–484
Agarwal SK, Burns AL, Sukhodolets KE, Kennedy PA, Obungu VH, Hickman AB et al (2004) Molecular pathology of the MEN1 gene. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1014:189–198, Epub 2004/05/22
Knudson AG (1996) Hereditary cancer: two hits revisited. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 122(3):135–140
Thepot D, Weitzman JB, Barra J, Segretain D, Stinnakre MG, Babinet C et al (2000) Targeted disruption of the murine JunD gene results in multiple defects in male reproductive function. Development 127(1):143–153, Epub 2000/02/02
Agarwal SK, Guru SC, Heppner C, Erdos MR, Collins RM, Park SY et al (1999) Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD-activated transcription. Cell 96(1):143–152
Hendy GN, Kaji H, Sowa H, Lebrun JJ, Canaff L (2005) Menin and TGF-beta superfamily member signaling via the Smad pathway in pituitary, parathyroid and osteoblast. Horm Metab Res 37(6):375–379
Kaji H, Canaff L, Lebrun JJ, Goltzman D, Hendy GN (2001) Inactivation of menin, a Smad3-interacting protein, blocks transforming growth factor type beta signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(7):3837–3842
Lemmens IH, Forsberg L, Pannett AA, Meyen E, Piehl F, Turner JJ et al (2001) Menin interacts directly with the homeobox-containing protein Pem. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286(2):426–431
Heppner C, Bilimoria KY, Agarwal SK, Kester M, Whitty LJ, Guru SC et al (2001) The tumor suppressor protein menin interacts with NF-kappaB proteins and inhibits NF-kappaB-mediated transactivation. Oncogene 20(36):4917–4925
Agarwal S, Scecheri P, Rice T, Kennedy P, Ozawa A, Burgess-Hickman A et al (2006) MEN1 gene: mutation and pathophysiology. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 67(Suppl 4):IS12–IS13
Agarwal SK, Impey S, McWeeney S, Scacheri PC, Collins FS, Goodman RH et al (2007) Distribution of menin-occupied regions in chromatin specifies a broad role of menin in transcriptional regulation. Neoplasia 9(2):101–107
Thakker RV, Bouloux P, Wooding C, Chotai K, Broad PM, Spurr NK et al (1989) Association of parathyroid tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with loss of alleles on chromosome 11. N Engl J Med 321(4):218–224, Epub 1989/07/27
Agarwal SK, Debelenko LV, Kester MB, Guru SC, Manickam P, Olufemi SE et al (1998) Analysis of recurrent germline mutations in the MEN1 gene encountered in apparently unrelated families. Hum Mutat 12(2):75–82
Kishi M, Tsukada T, Shimizu S, Futami H, Ito Y, Kanbe M et al (1998) A large germline deletion of the MEN1 gene in a family with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Jpn J Cancer Res 89(1):1–5
Agarwal SK, Kester MB, Debelenko LV, Heppner C, Emmert-Buck MR, Skarulis MC et al (1997) Germline mutations of the MEN1 gene in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and related states. Hum Mol Genet 6(7):1169–1175
Kumar V, Fausto N (eds) (2005) Pathologic basis of disease, 7th edn. Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia
Lubensky IA, Pack S, Ault D, Vortmeyer AO, Libutti SK, Choyke PL et al (1998) Multiple neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease patients: histopathological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 153(1):223–231
Debelenko LV, Zhuang Z, Emmert-Buck MR, Chandrasekharappa SC, Manickam P, Guru SC et al (1997) Allelic deletions on chromosome 11q13 in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated and sporadic gastrinomas and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Cancer Res 57(11):2238–2243
Eubanks PJ, Sawicki MP, Samara GJ, Gatti R, Nakamura Y, Tsao D et al (1994) Putative tumor-suppressor gene on chromosome 11 is important in sporadic endocrine tumor formation. Am J Surg 167(1):180–185, Epub 1994/01/01
Zhuang Z, Vortmeyer AO, Pack S, Huang S, Pham TA, Wang C et al (1997) Somatic mutations of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene in sporadic gastrinomas and insulinomas. Cancer Res 57(21):4682–4686
Wang EH, Ebrahimi SA, Wu AY, Kashefi C, Passaro E Jr, Sawicki MP (1998) Mutation of the MENIN gene in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. Cancer Res 58(19):4417–4420
Goebel SU, Heppner C, Burns AL, Marx SJ, Spiegel AM, Zhuang Z et al (2000) Genotype/phenotype correlation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene mutations in sporadic gastrinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(1):116–123
Gortz B, Roth J, Krahenmann A, de Krijger RR, Muletta-Feurer S, Rutimann K et al (1999) Mutations and allelic deletions of the MEN1 gene are associated with a subset of sporadic endocrine pancreatic and neuroendocrine tumors and not restricted to foregut neoplasms. Am J Pathol 154(2):429–436
Williamson C, Pannett AA, Pang JT, Wooding C, McCarthy M, Sheppard MN et al (1997) Localisation of a gene causing endocrine neoplasia to a 4 cM region on chromosome 1p35-p36. J Med Genet 34(8):617–619
Kytola S, Makinen MJ, Kahkonen M, Teh BT, Leisti J, Salmela P (1998) Comparative genomic hybridization studies in tumours from a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Eur J Endocrinol 139(2):202–206
Franklin DS, Godfrey VL, O’Brien DA, Deng C, Xiong Y (2000) Functional collaboration between different cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors suppresses tumor growth with distinct tissue specificity. Mol Cell Biol 20(16):6147–6158
Pestell RG, Albanese C, Reutens AT, Segall JE, Lee RJ, Arnold A (1999) The cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in hormonal regulation of proliferation and differentiation. Endocr Rev 20(4):501–534
Perren A, Anlauf M, Henopp T, Rudolph T, Schmitt A, Raffel A et al (2007) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): loss of one MEN1 allele in tumors and monohormonal endocrine cell clusters but not in islet hyperplasia of the pancreas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(3):1118–1128, Epub 2006/12/21
Anlauf M, Perren A, Meyer CL, Schmid S, Saremaslani P, Kruse ML et al (2005) Precursor lesions in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated duodenal gastrinomas. Gastroenterology 128(5):1187–1198, Epub 2005/05/12
Crabtree JS, Scacheri PC, Ward JM, Garrett-Beal L, Emmert-Buck MR, Edgemon KA et al (2001) A mouse model of multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1, develops multiple endocrine tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(3):1118–1123
Crabtree JS, Scacheri PC, Ward JM, McNally SR, Swain GP, Montagna C et al (2003) Of mice and MEN1: insulinomas in a conditional mouse knockout. Mol Cell Biol 23(17):6075–6085
Frosch M, Anthony D, Girolami U (2005) Robin’s and Cotran’s pathologic basis of disease, 7th edn. Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia
Binkovitz LA, Johnson CD, Stephens DH (1990) Islet cell tumors in von Hippel-Lindau disease: increased prevalence and relationship to the multiple endocrine neoplasias. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155(3):501–505
Hough DM, Stephens DH, Johnson CD, Binkovitz LA (1994) Pancreatic lesions in von Hippel-Lindau disease: prevalence, clinical significance, and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(5):1091–1094
Neumann HP, Dinkel E, Brambs H, Wimmer B, Friedburg H, Volk B et al (1991) Pancreatic lesions in the von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Gastroenterology 101(2):465–471
LaForgia S, Lasota J, Latif F, Boghosian-Sell L, Kastury K, Ohta M et al (1993) Detailed genetic and physical map of the 3p chromosome region surrounding the familial renal cell carcinoma chromosome translocation, t(3;8)(p14.2;q24.1). Cancer Res 53(13):3118–3124
Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ (2003) Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: role of the HIF system. Nat Med 9(6):677–684, Epub 2003/06/05
Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ (2001) The pVHL-hIF-1 system. A key mediator of oxygen homeostasis. Adv Exp Med Biol 502:365–376
Ratcliffe PJ, O’Rourke JF, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW (1998) Oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and the regulation of mammalian gene expression. J Exp Biol 201(Pt 8):1153–1162
Kim WY, Kaelin WG (2004) Role of VHL gene mutation in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4991–5004
Lamberts SW, Krenning EP, Reubi JC (1991) The role of somatostatin and its analogs in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. Endocr Rev 12(4):450–482
Na X, Wu G, Ryan CK, Schoen SR, di’Santagnese PA, Messing EM (2003) Overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor related to von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene mutations and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression in renal cell carcinomas. J Urol 170(2 Pt 1):588–592
Wang XC, Xu SY, Wu XY, Song HD, Mao YF, Fan HY et al (2004) Gene expression profiling in human insulinoma tissue: genes involved in the insulin secretion pathway and cloning of novel full-length cDNAs. Endocr Relat Cancer 11(2):295–303
Petrella BL, Lohi J, Brinckerhoff CE (2005) Identification of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase as a target of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha in von Hippel-Lindau renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 24(6):1043–1052, Epub 2004/12/14
Petrella BL, Brinckerhoff CE (2006) Tumor cell invasion of von Hippel Lindau renal cell carcinoma cells is mediated by membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase. Mol Cancer 5:66, Epub 2006/12/05
Konno H, Arai T, Tanaka T, Baba M, Matsumoto K, Kanai T et al (1998) Antitumor effect of a neutralizing antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor on liver metastasis of endocrine neoplasm. Jpn J Cancer Res 89(9):933–939
Yao JC, Hoff PM (2007) Molecular targeted therapy for neuroendocrine tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 21(3):575–581
Hammel PR, Vilgrain V, Terris B, Penfornis A, Sauvanet A, Correas JM et al (2000) Pancreatic involvement in von Hippel-Lindau disease. The Groupe Francophone d’Etude de la Maladie de von Hippel-Lindau. Gastroenterology 119(4):1087–1095
Hoang MP, Hruban RH, Albores-Saavedra J (2001) Clear cell endocrine pancreatic tumor mimicking renal cell carcinoma: a distinctive neoplasm of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Am J Surg Pathol 25(5):602–609
Chung DC, Smith AP, Louis DN, Graeme-Cook F, Warshaw AL, Arnold A (1997) A novel pancreatic endocrine tumor suppressor gene locus on chromosome 3p with clinical prognostic implications. J Clin Invest 100(2):404–410
Missiaglia E, Moore PS, Williamson J, Lemoine NR, Falconi M, Zamboni G et al (2002) Sex chromosome anomalies in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Int J Cancer 98(4):532–538
Tan CC, Hall RI, Semeraro D, Irons RP, Freeman JG (1996) Ampullary somatostatinoma associated with von Recklinghausen’s neurofibromatosis presenting as obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol 22(3):298–301
van Slegtenhorst M, de Hoogt R, Hermans C, Nellist M, Janssen B, Verhoef S et al (1997) Identification of the tuberous sclerosis gene TSC1 on chromosome 9q34. Science 277(5327):805–808, Epub 1997/08/08
European Chromosome 16 Tuberous Sclerosis C (1993) Identification and characterization of the tuberous sclerosis gene on chromosome 16. Cell 75(7):1305–1315, Epub 1993/12/31
Sandsmark DK, Pelletier C, Weber JD, Gutmann DH (2007) Mammalian target of rapamycin: master regulator of cell growth in the nervous system. Histol Histopathol 22(8):895–903, Epub 2007/05/16
Castro AF, Rebhun JF, Clark GJ, Quilliam LA (2003) Rheb binds tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) and promotes S6 kinase activation in a rapamycin- and farnesylation-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 278(35):32493–32496, Epub 2003/07/05
Zikusoka MN, Kidd M, Eick G, Latich I, Modlin IM (2005) The molecular genetics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 104(11):2292–2309
Mak BC, Takemaru K, Kenerson HL, Moon RT, Yeung RS (2003) The tuberin-hamartin complex negatively regulates beta-catenin signaling activity. J Biol Chem 278(8):5947–5951
Verhoef S, van Diemen-Steenvoorde R, Akkersdijk WL, Bax NM, Ariyurek Y, Hermans CJ et al (1999) Malignant pancreatic tumour within the spectrum of tuberous sclerosis complex in childhood. Eur J Pediatr 158(4):284–287
Swenne I (1982) The role of glucose in the in vitro regulation of cell cycle kinetics and proliferation of fetal pancreatic B-cells. Diabetes 31(9):754–760
Bonner-Weir S, Deery D, Leahy JL, Weir GC (1989) Compensatory growth of pancreatic beta-cells in adult rats after short-term glucose infusion. Diabetes 38(1):49–53
Paris M, Bernard-Kargar C, Berthault MF, Bouwens L, Ktorza A (2003) Specific and combined effects of insulin and glucose on functional pancreatic beta-cell mass in vivo in adult rats. Endocrinology 144(6):2717–2727, Epub 2003/05/15
Jonkers YM, Ramaekers FC, Speel EJ (2007) Molecular alterations during insulinoma tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1775(2):313–332
Balogh K, Racz K, Patocs A, Hunyady L (2006) Menin and its interacting proteins: elucidation of menin function. Trends Endocrinol Metab 17(9):357–364, Epub 2006/09/26
Jin S, Mao H, Schnepp RW, Sykes SM, Silva AC, D’Andrea AD et al (2003) Menin associates with FANCD2, a protein involved in repair of DNA damage. Cancer Res 63(14):4204–4210
Gumbs AA, Moore PS, Falconi M, Bassi C, Beghelli S, Modlin I et al (2002) Review of the clinical, histological, and molecular aspects of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. J Surg Oncol 81(1):45–53, discussion 4. Epub 2002/09/05
Speel EJ, Richter J, Moch H, Egenter C, Saremaslani P, Rutimann K et al (1999) Genetic differences in endocrine pancreatic tumor subtypes detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Am J Pathol 155(6):1787–1794
Zhao J, Moch H, Scheidweiler AF, Baer A, Schaffer AA, Speel EJ et al (2001) Genomic imbalances in the progression of endocrine pancreatic tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 32(4):364–372
Speel EJ, Scheidweiler AF, Zhao J, Matter C, Saremaslani P, Roth J et al (2001) Genetic evidence for early divergence of small functioning and nonfunctioning endocrine pancreatic tumors: gain of 9Q34 is an early event in insulinomas. Cancer Res 61(13):5186–5192
Stumpf E, Aalto Y, Hoog A, Kjellman M, Otonkoski T, Knuutila S et al (2000) Chromosomal alterations in human pancreatic endocrine tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 29(1):83–87
Tonnies H, Toliat MR, Ramel C, Pape UF, Neitzel H, Berger W et al (2001) Analysis of sporadic neuroendocrine tumours of the enteropancreatic system by comparative genomic hybridisation. Gut 48(4):536–541
Terris B, Meddeb M, Marchio A, Danglot G, Flejou JF, Belghiti J et al (1998) Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of sporadic neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 22(1):50–56
Kytola S, Hoog A, Nord B, Cedermark B, Frisk T, Larsson C et al (2001) Comparative genomic hybridization identifies loss of 18q22-qter as an early and specific event in tumorigenesis of midgut carcinoids. Am J Pathol 158(5):1803–1808
Pizzi S, D’Adda T, Azzoni C, Rindi G, Grigolato P, Pasquali C et al (2002) Malignancy-associated allelic losses on the X-chromosome in foregut but not in midgut endocrine tumours. J Pathol 196(4):401–407
Brown MR, Kohn EC, Hutter RV (2000) The new millennium: applying novel technology to the study of the cancer cell in situ. Cancer 88(1):2–5, Epub 2000/01/05
Ebrahimi SA, Wang EH, Wu A, Schreck RR, Passaro E Jr, Sawicki MP (1999) Deletion of chromosome 1 predicts prognosis in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Cancer Res 59(2):311–315
Guo SS, Arora C, Shimoide AT, Sawicki MP (2002) Frequent deletion of chromosome 3 in malignant sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 190(1–2):109–114
Chen YJ, Vortmeyer A, Zhuang Z, Huang S, Jensen RT (2003) Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 1q in gastrinomas: occurrence and prognostic significance. Cancer Res 63(4):817–823
Lott ST, Chandler DS, Curley SA, Foster CJ, El-Naggar A, Frazier M et al (2002) High frequency loss of heterozygosity in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-associated and sporadic pancreatic islet cell tumors: evidence for a stepwise mechanism for malignant conversion in VHL tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 62(7):1952–1955
Nikiforova MN, Nikiforov YE, Biddinger P, Gnepp DR, Grosembacher LA, Wajchenberg BL et al (1999) Frequent loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 3p14.2-3p21 in human pancreatic islet cell tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51(1):27–33
Guo SS, Wu AY, Sawicki MP (2002) Deletion of chromosome 1, but not mutation of MEN-1, predicts prognosis in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. World J Surg 26(7):843–847
Barghorn A, Speel EJ, Farspour B, Saremaslani P, Schmid S, Perren A et al (2001) Putative tumor suppressor loci at 6q22 and 6q23-q24 are involved in the malignant progression of sporadic endocrine pancreatic tumors. Am J Pathol 158(6):1903–1911
Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Fisher WE, Foor J, Ellison EC, Herman JG et al (1998) Genetic alterations in gastrinomas and nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of p16/MTS1 tumor suppressor gene inactivation. Cancer Res 58(2):237–240
Rigaud G, Missiaglia E, Moore PS, Zamboni G, Falconi M, Talamini G et al (2001) High resolution allelotype of nonfunctional pancreatic endocrine tumors: identification of two molecular subgroups with clinical implications. Cancer Res 61(1):285–292
Wild A, Langer P, Celik I, Chaloupka B, Bartsch DK (2002) Chromosome 22q in pancreatic endocrine tumors: identification of a homozygous deletion and potential prognostic associations of allelic deletions. Eur J Endocrinol 147(4):507–513
Ikawa S, Nakagawara A, Ikawa Y (1999) p53 family genes: structural comparison, expression and mutation. Cell Death Differ 6(12):1154–1161
Moore PS, Orlandini S, Zamboni G, Capelli P, Rigaud G, Falconi M et al (2001) Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 84(2):253–262
Perren A, Komminoth P, Saremaslani P, Matter C, Feurer S, Lees JA et al (2000) Mutation and expression analyses reveal differential subcellular compartmentalization of PTEN in endocrine pancreatic tumors compared to normal islet cells. Am J Pathol 157(4):1097–1103
Hirawake H, Taniwaki M, Tamura A, Amino H, Tomitsuka E, Kita K (1999) Characterization of the human SDHD gene encoding the small subunit of cytochrome b (cybS) in mitochondrial succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1412(3):295–300
Moore PS, Missiaglia E, Antonello D, Zamo A, Zamboni G, Corleto V et al (2001) Role of disease-causing genes in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors: MEN1 and VHL. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 32(2):177–181
Bartsch D, Hahn SA, Danichevski KD, Ramaswamy A, Bastian D, Galehdari H et al (1999) Mutations of the DPC4/Smad4 gene in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Oncogene 18(14):2367–2371
Hahn SA, Schutte M, Hoque AT, Moskaluk CA, da Costa LT, Rozenblum E et al (1996) DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21.1. Science 271(5247):350–353
Perren A, Saremaslani P, Schmid S, Bonvin C, Locher T, Roth J et al (2003) DPC4/Smad4: no mutations, rare allelic imbalances, and retained protein expression in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Diagn Mol Pathol 12(4):181–186
Wild A, Langer P, Ramaswamy A, Chaloupka B, Bartsch DK (2001) A novel insulinoma tumor suppressor gene locus on chromosome 22q with potential prognostic implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(12):5782–5787
Biegel JA, Fogelgren B, Zhou JY, James CD, Janss AJ, Allen JC et al (2000) Mutations of the INI1 rhabdoid tumor suppressor gene in medulloblastomas and primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system. Clin Cancer Res 6(7):2759–2763, Epub 2000/07/29
Chen YJ, Vortmeyer A, Zhuang Z, Gibril F, Jensen RT (2004) X-chromosome loss of heterozygosity frequently occurs in gastrinomas and is correlated with aggressive tumor growth. Cancer 100(7):1379–1387
Ponce-Castaneda MV, Lee MH, Latres E, Polyak K, Lacombe L, Montgomery K et al (1995) p27Kip1: chromosomal mapping to 12p12-12p13.1 and absence of mutations in human tumors. Cancer Res 55(6):1211–1214
Guo SS, Wu X, Shimoide AT, Wong J, Sawicki MP (2001) Anomalous overexpression of p27(Kip1) in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Surg Res 96(2):284–288
Canavese G, Azzoni C, Pizzi S, Corleto VD, Pasquali C, Davoli C et al (2001) p27: a potential main inhibitor of cell proliferation in digestive endocrine tumors but not a marker of benign behavior. Hum Pathol 32(10):1094–1101
Mao L, Merlo A, Bedi G, Shapiro GI, Edwards CD, Rollins BJ et al (1995) A novel p16INK4A transcript. Cancer Res 55(14):2995–2997
Liggett WH Jr, Sidransky D (1998) Role of the p16 tumor suppressor gene in cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(3):1197–1206
Lubomierski N, Kersting M, Bert T, Muench K, Wulbrand U, Schuermann M et al (2001) Tumor suppressor genes in the 9p21 gene cluster are selective targets of inactivation in neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. Cancer Res 61(15):5905–5910
Schuuring E, Verhoeven E, Mooi WJ, Michalides RJ (1992) Identification and cloning of two overexpressed genes, U21B31/PRAD1 and EMS1, within the amplified chromosome 11q13 region in human carcinomas. Oncogene 7(2):355–361
Arnold A, Motokura T, Bloom T, Rosenberg C, Bale A, Kronenberg H et al (1992) PRAD1 (cyclin D1): a parathyroid neoplasia gene on 11q13. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 40(3–4):177–180
Chung DC, Brown SB, Graeme-Cook F, Seto M, Warshaw AL, Jensen RT et al (2000) Overexpression of cyclin D1 occurs frequently in human pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(11):4373–4378
Guo SS, Wu X, Shimoide AT, Wong J, Moatamed F, Sawicki MP (2003) Frequent overexpression of cyclin D1 in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumours. J Endocrinol 179(1):73–79
Gille H, Downward J (1999) Multiple Ras effector pathways contribute to G(1) cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 274(31):22033–22040
Lavoie JN, L’Allemain G, Brunet A, Muller R, Pouyssegur J (1996) Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 271(34):20608–20616
Weber JD, Raben DM, Phillips PJ, Baldassare JJ (1997) Sustained activation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) is required for the continued expression of cyclin D1 in G1 phase. Biochem J 326(Pt 1):61–68
Iwamura Y, Futagawa T, Kaneko M, Nakagawa K, Kawai K, Yamashita K et al (1992) Co-deletions of the retinoblastoma gene and Wilms’ tumor gene and rearrangement of the Krev-1 gene in a human insulinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 22(1):6–9
Nakamura T, Iwamura Y, Kaneko M, Nakagawa K, Kawai K, Mitamura K et al (1991) Deletions and rearrangements of the retinoblastoma gene in hepatocellular carcinoma, insulinoma and some neurogenic tumors as found in a study of 121 tumors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21(5):325–329
Chung DC, Smith AP, Louis DN, Graeme-Cook F, Warshaw AL, Arnold A (1997) Analysis of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor gene in pancreatic endocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47(5):523–528
Kawahara M, Kammori M, Kanauchi H, Noguchi C, Kuramoto S, Kaminishi M et al (2002) Immunohistochemical prognostic indicators of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 28(2):140–146
Nishikura K, Watanabe H, Iwafuchi M, Fujiwara T, Kojima K, Ajioka Y (2003) Carcinogenesis of gastric endocrine cell carcinoma: analysis of histopathology and p53 gene alteration. Gastric Cancer 6(4):203–209
Weckstrom P, Hedrum A, Makridis C, Akerstrom G, Rastad J, Scheibenpflug L et al (1996) Midgut carcinoids and solid carcinomas of the intestine: differences in endocrine markers and p53 mutations. Endocr Pathol 7(4):273–279
Oberg K, Eriksson B (2005) Endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 19(5):753–781, Epub 2005/10/29
Kraus C, Liehr T, Hulsken J, Behrens J, Birchmeier W, Grzeschik KH et al (1994) Localization of the human beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) to 3p21: a region implicated in tumor development. Genomics 23(1):272–274
Gerdes B, Ramaswamy A, Simon B, Pietsch T, Bastian D, Kersting M et al (1999) Analysis of beta-catenin gene mutations in pancreatic tumors. Digestion 60(6):544–548
Sinke RJ, Geurts van Kessel AG (1995) Localization of the human phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase c beta 3 gene (PLCB3) within chromosome band 11q13. Genomics 25(2):568–569
Chan AO, Kim SG, Bedeir A, Issa JP, Hamilton SR, Rashid A (2003) CpG island methylation in carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Oncogene 22(6):924–934
Mattei MG, de The H, Mattei JF, Marchio A, Tiollais P, Dejean A (1988) Assignment of the human hap retinoic acid receptor RAR beta gene to the p24 band of chromosome 3. Hum Genet 80(2):189–190
Bernal-Mizrachi E, Wen W, Stahlhut S, Welling CM, Permutt MA (2001) Islet beta cell expression of constitutively active Akt1/PKB alpha induces striking hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Invest 108(11):1631–1638
Hugl SR, White MF, Rhodes CJ (1998) Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I)-stimulated pancreatic beta-cell growth is glucose-dependent. Synergistic activation of insulin receptor substrate-mediated signal transduction pathways by glucose and IGF-I in INS-1 cells. J Biol Chem 273(28):17771–17779
Jetton TL, Lausier J, LaRock K, Trotman WE, Larmie B, Habibovic A et al (2005) Mechanisms of compensatory beta-cell growth in insulin-resistant rats: roles of Akt kinase. Diabetes 54(8):2294–2304
McBride OW, Swan DC, Tronick SR, Gol R, Klimanis D, Moore DE et al (1983) Regional chromosomal localization of N-ras, K-ras-1, K-ras-2 and myb oncogenes in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 11(23):8221–8236
McCormick F (1995) Ras-related proteins in signal transduction and growth control. Mol Reprod Dev 42(4):500–506
Yashiro T, Fulton N, Hara H, Yasuda K, Montag A, Yashiro N et al (1993) Comparison of mutations of ras oncogene in human pancreatic exocrine and endocrine tumors. Surgery 114(4):758–763, discussion 63–4
Pavelic K, Hrascan R, Kapitanovic S, Karapandza N, Vranes Z, Belicza M et al (1995) Multiple genetic alterations in malignant metastatic insulinomas. J Pathol 177(4):395–400, Epub 1995/12/01
Dilley WG, Kalyanaraman S, Verma S, Cobb JP, Laramie JM, Lairmore TC (2005) Global gene expression in neuroendocrine tumors from patients with the MEN1 syndrome. Mol Cancer 4(1):9, Epub 2005/02/05
Pelengaris S, Khan M (2001) Oncogenic co-operation in beta-cell tumorigenesis. Endocr Relat Cancer 8(4):307–314
Hager JH, Hanahan D (1999) Tumor cells utilize multiple pathways to down-modulate apoptosis. Lessons from a mouse model of islet cell carcinogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 887:150–163
Muleris M, Almeida A, Malfoy B, Dutrillaux B (1997) Assignment of v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ERBB2) to human chromosome band 17q21.1 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 76(1–2):34–35
Bacus SS, Zelnick CR, Plowman G, Yarden Y (1994) Expression of the erbB-2 family of growth factor receptors and their ligands in breast cancers. Implication for tumor biology and clinical behavior. Am J Clin Pathol 102(4 Suppl 1):S13–S24
Goebel SU, Iwamoto M, Raffeld M, Gibril F, Hou W, Serrano J et al (2002) Her-2/neu expression and gene amplification in gastrinomas: correlations with tumor biology, growth, and aggressiveness. Cancer Res 62(13):3702–3710
Gosden JR, Middleton PG, Rout D (1986) Localization of the human oestrogen receptor gene to chromosome 6q24–q27 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 43(3–4):218–220
Altundag O, Altundag K, Gunduz M (2004) DNA methylation inhibitor, procainamide, may decrease the tamoxifen resistance by inducing overexpression of the estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer patients. Med Hypotheses 63(4):684–687
Kolodner RD, Hall NR, Lipford J, Kane MF, Morrison PT, Finan PJ et al (1995) Structure of the human MLH1 locus and analysis of a large hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma kindred for mlh1 mutations. Cancer Res 55(2):242–248
House MG, Herman JG, Guo MZ, Hooker CM, Schulick RD, Cameron JL et al (2003) Prognostic value of hMLH1 methylation and microsatellite instability in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Surgery 134(6):902–908, discussion 9
Wick M, Zubov D, Hagen G (1999) Genomic organization and promoter characterization of the gene encoding the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). Gene 232(1):97–106
Vezzosi D, Bouisson M, Escourrou G, Laurell H, Selves J, Seguin P et al (2006) Clinical utility of telomerase for the diagnosis of malignant well-differentiated endocrine tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 64(1):63–67
House MG, Schulick RD (2006) Endocrine tumors of the pancreas. Curr Opin Oncol 18(1):23–29
Iino S, Abeyama K, Kawahara K, Yamakuchi M, Hashiguchi T, Matsukita S et al (2004) The antimetastatic role of thrombomodulin expression in islet cell-derived tumors and its diagnostic value. Clin Cancer Res 10(18 Pt 1):6179–6188
von Wichert G, Jehle PM, Hoeflich A, Koschnick S, Dralle H, Wolf E et al (2000) Insulin-like growth factor-I is an autocrine regulator of chromogranin A secretion and growth in human neuroendocrine tumor cells. Cancer Res 60(16):4573–4581, Epub 2000/09/02
Terris B, Scoazec JY, Rubbia L, Bregeaud L, Pepper MS, Ruszniewski P et al (1998) Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in digestive neuroendocrine tumours. Histopathology 32(2):133–138, Epub 1998/04/17
La Rosa S, Uccella S, Finzi G, Albarello L, Sessa F, Capella C (2003) Localization of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in digestive endocrine tumors: correlation with microvessel density and clinicopathologic features. Hum Pathol 34(1):18–27, Epub 2003/02/28
Alexiev BA, Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC (2007) Endocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas: grading, tumor size and proliferation index do not predict malignant behavior. Diagn Pathol 2:28, Epub 2007/08/10
Bajetta E, Catena L, Procopio G, Bichisao E, Ferrari L, Della Torre S et al (2005) Is the new WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumours useful for selecting an appropriate treatment? Ann Oncol 16(8):1374–1380, Epub 2005/06/09
Falconi M, Plockinger U, Kwekkeboom DJ, Manfredi R, Korner M, Kvols L et al (2006) Well-differentiated pancreatic nonfunctioning tumors/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 84(3):196–211, Epub 2007/02/22
Bettini R, Boninsegna L, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Bassi C, Pederzoli P et al (2008) Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours. Ann Oncol 19(5):903–908, Epub 2008/01/23
Pape UF, Jann H, Muller-Nordhorn J, Bockelbrink A, Berndt U, Willich SN et al (2008) Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 113(2):256–265, Epub 2008/05/29
Kloppel G, Rindi G, Anlauf M, Perren A, Komminoth P (2007) Site-specific biology and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Virchows Arch 451(Suppl 1):S9–S27, Epub 2007/08/09
Solcia E, Rindi G, Paolotti D, La Rosa S, Capella C, Fiocca R (1999) Clinicopathological profile as a basis for classification of the endocrine tumours of the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Ann Oncol 10(Suppl 2):S9–S15, Epub 1999/07/10
Wick MR, Graeme-Cook FM (2001) Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a current summary of diagnostic, prognostic, and differential diagnostic information. Am J Clin Pathol 115(Suppl):S28–S45, Epub 2002/05/08
Hochwald SN, Zee S, Conlon KC, Colleoni R, Louie O, Brennan MF et al (2002) Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups. J Clin Oncol 20(11):2633–2642, Epub 2002/06/01
Rindi G, Kloppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449(4):395–401, Epub 2006/09/13
Maitra A, Hansel DE, Argani P, Ashfaq R, Rahman A, Naji A et al (2003) Global expression analysis of well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms using oligonucleotide microarrays. Clin Cancer Res 9(16 Pt 1):5988–5995, Epub 2003/12/17
Bloomston M, Durkin A, Yang I, Rojiani M, Rosemurgy AS, Enkmann S et al (2004) Identification of molecular markers specific for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors by genetic profiling of core biopsies. Ann Surg Oncol 11(4):413–419, Epub 2004/04/09
Capurso G, Lattimore S, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Panzuto F, Milione M, Bhakta V et al (2006) Gene expression profiles of progressive pancreatic endocrine tumours and their liver metastases reveal potential novel markers and therapeutic targets. Endocr Relat Cancer 13(2):541–558, Epub 2006/05/27
Couvelard A, Hu J, Steers G, O’Toole D, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J et al (2006) Identification of potential therapeutic targets by gene-expression profiling in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 131(5):1597–1610, Epub 2006/10/27
Duerr EM, Mizukami Y, Ng A, Xavier RJ, Kikuchi H, Deshpande V et al (2008) Defining molecular classifications and targets in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors through DNA microarray analysis. Endocr Relat Cancer 15(1):243–256, Epub 2008/03/04
Shida T, Furuya M, Kishimoto T, Nikaido T, Tanizawa T, Koda K et al (2008) The expression of NeuroD and mASH1 in the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Mod Pathol 21(11):1363–1370, Epub 2008/07/01
Hansel DE, Rahman A, Hermans J, de Krijger RR, Ashfaq R, Yeo CJ et al (2003) Liver metastases arising from well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms demonstrate increased VEGF-C expression. Mod Pathol 16(7):652–659
Hansel DE, Rahman A, House M, Ashfaq R, Berg K, Yeo CJ et al (2004) Met proto-oncogene and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 overexpression correlates with metastatic ability in well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res 10(18 Pt 1):6152–6158, Epub 2004/09/28
Vortmeyer AO, Lubensky IA, Skarulis M, Li G, Moon YW, Park WS et al (1999) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: atypical presentation, clinical course, and genetic analysis of multiple tumors. Mod Pathol 12(9):919–924, Epub 1999/09/25
Van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871):530–536, Epub 2002/02/02
Singh D, Febbo PG, Ross K, Jackson DG, Manola J, Ladd C et al (2002) Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell 1(2):203–209, Epub 2002/06/28
Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, Sturla LM, Angelo M, McLaughlin ME et al (2002) Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415(6870):436–442, Epub 2002/01/25
Metz DC, Jensen RT (2008) Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 135(5):1469–1492
Nasir A, McCarthy S, Agrawal D, Bloom G, Zeringer E, Chen D, et al. (eds) (2008) Novel progression genes in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. In: Annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago
Nasir A, McCarthy S, Zeringer E, Bloom G, Eschrich S, Chen D, et al. (eds) (2008) Discovery and validation of progression-associated genes in primary pancreatic endocrine tumors. In: North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) symposium, South Hampton, Bermuda
Nasir A, Helm J, Strosberg J, Henderson-Jackson E, Turner L, Hafez N, et al. (eds) (2009) Molecular markers outclass pathologic criteria of malignancy in predicting liver metastases in primary pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. In: International meeting of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) meeting, Granada
Nasir A, Helm J, Turner L, Chen DT, Strosberg J, Hafez N et al (2011) RUNX1T1: a novel predictor of liver metastasis in primary pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Pancreas 40(4):627–633, Epub 2011/04/19
Henderson-Jackson EB, Helm J, Strosberg J, Nasir NA, Yeatman TJ, Kvols LK et al (2011) Palladin is a marker of liver metastasis in primary pancreatic endocrine carcinomas. Anticancer Res 31(9):2957–2962, Epub 2011/08/27
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the excellent support from Brenda Barrow and Rasa Hamilton of Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nasir, A. et al. (2014). Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics of Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasms. In: Coppola, D. (eds) Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics of Cancer. Cancer Growth and Progression, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7192-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7192-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7191-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7192-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)