Abstract
In these introductory lectures we discuss classes of presently known nested sums, associated iterated integrals, and special constants which hierarchically appear in the evaluation of massless and massive Feynman diagrams at higher loops. These quantities are elements of stuffle and shuffle algebras implying algebraic relations being widely independent of the special quantities considered. They are supplemented by structural relations. The generalizations are given in terms of generalized harmonic sums, (generalized) cyclotomic sums, and sums containing in addition binomial and inverse-binomial weights. To all these quantities iterated integrals and special numbers are associated. We also discuss the analytic continuation of nested sums of different kind to complex values of the external summation bound N.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
In the solution of physical problems very often new classes of special functions have been created during the last three centuries, cf. [1–5]. This applies especially also to the analytic calculation of Feynman-parameter integrals [6] for massless and massive two- and more-point functions, also containing local operator insertions and corresponding quantities, cf. [7, 8]. In case of zero mass-scale quantities the associated integrals map to special numbers, lately having been called periods [9], see also [10]. In case of single-scale quantities, expressed as a ratio x ∈ [0,1] to the defining mass scale, the integrals are Poincaré iterated integrals [11, 12] or they emerge as a Mellin-transform at \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) [13] in terms of multiply nested sums. A systematic way to these structures has been described in [14, 15]. Here an essential tool consists in representations by Mellin–Barnes [16] integrals. They are applicable also for integrals of multi-scale more-loop and multi-leg Feynman integrals [17], which are, however, less explored at present.
In the practical calculations dimensional regularization in \(D = 4+\varepsilon\) space-time dimensions [18] is used, which is essential to maintain conservation laws due to the Noether theorem and probability. It provides the singularities of the problem in terms of poles in \(\varepsilon\). However, the Feynman parameter integrals are not performed over rational integrands but hyperexponential ones. Thus one passes through higher transcendental functions [4, 5] from the beginning. The renormalization is carried out in the \(\overline{\mathrm{MS}}\)-scheme, chosen as the standard. In new calculations various ingredients as anomalous dimensions and expansion coefficients of the β-functions needed in the renormalization can thus be used referring to results given in the literature. At higher orders the calculation of these quantities requests a major investment and is not easily repeated at present within other schemes in a short time.
With growing complexity of the perturbative calculations in Quantum Field Theories the functions emerging in integration and summation had to be systematized. While a series of massless two-loop calculations, cf. [19], during the 1980s and 1990s initially still could be performed referring to the classical polylogarithms [12, 20–23] and Nielsen-integrals [24], the structure of the results became readily involved. In 1998 a first general standard was introduced [25, 26] by the nested harmonic sums, and shortly after the harmonic polylogarithms [27]. Further extensions are given by the generalized harmonic sums, the so-called S-sums [28, 29] and the (generalized) cyclotomic sums [30], see Fig. 1. Considering problems at even higher loops and a growing number of legs, also associated with more mass scales, one expects various new levels of generalization to emerge. In particular, also elliptic integrals will contribute [31]. These structures can be found systematically by applying symbolic summation, cf. [32], and integration formalisms, cf. [33, 34], which also allow to proof the relative transcendence of the basis elements found and are therefore applied in the calculation of Feynman diagrams.
In this survey we present an introduction to a series of well-studied structures which have been unraveled during the last years. The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 a survey is given on polylogarithms, Nielsen integrals and harmonic polylogarithms. In Sect. 3 harmonic sums are discussed. Both harmonic polylogarithms and harmonic sums obey algebraic and structural relations on which a survey is given in Sect. 4. In Sect. 5 we discuss properties of the multiple zeta values which emerge as special constants in the context of harmonic sums and polylogarithms. The S-sums, associated iterated integrals, and special numbers are considered in Sect. 6. The generalization of harmonic sums and S-sums to (generalized) cyclotomic sums, polylogarithms and numbers is given in Sect. 7. A further generalization, which appears in massive multi-loop calculations, to nested binomial and inverse-binomial harmonic sums and polylogarithms is outlined in Sect. 8. Finally, we discuss in Sect. 9 the analytic continuation of the different kind of nested sums in the argument N to complex numbers, which is needed in various physical applications. Section 10 contains the conclusions. The various mathematical relations between the different quantities being discussed in the present article are implemented in the Mathematica package HarmonicSums.m [29, 35].
2 Polylogarithms, Nielsen Integrals, Harmonic Polylogarithms
Different particle propagators \(1/A_{k}(p_{i},m_{i})\) can be linked using Feynman’s integral representation [36]
While the momentum integrals over p i can be easily performed, the problem consists in integrating the Feynman parameters x k . In the simplest cases the associated integrand is a multi-rational function. In the first integrals one obtains multi-rational functions, but also logarithms [33]. The logarithms [37] have to be introduced as new functions being transcendental to the rational functions
Iterating this integral by
one obtains the dilogarithm or Spence-function [20, 21], which may be extended to the classical polylogarithms [12, 21–23]
All these functions are transcendental to the former ones. For an early occurrence of the dilogarithm in Quantum Field Theory see [38].
The above iterations are special cases in iterating differential forms in \(\{\mathit{dz}/z,\mathit{dz}/(1 - z)\}\). The general case is described as Nielsen integrals [24].
Likewise, one might also consider the set \(\{\mathit{dz}/z,\mathit{dz}/(1 + z)\}\). Nielsen integrals obey the relation
One may derive serial representations around x = 0, as e.g.:
see also [39]. Here \(S_{1}(n) =\sum _{ k=1}^{n}(1/k)\) denotes the harmonic sum. The Nielsen integrals obey various relations [12, 20–24]. A few examples are:
Here \(\zeta _{n} =\sum _{ k=1}^{\infty }(1/{k}^{n}),\ \ n \geq 2,n \in \mathbb{N}\) are values of Riemann’s ζ-function.
Going to higher orders in perturbation theory it turns out that the Nielsen integrals are sufficient for massless and some massive two-loop problems, cf. [26, 40], and as well for the three-loop anomalous dimensions [41], allowing for some extended arguments as − x,x 2. At a given level of complexity, however, one has to refer to a more general alphabet, namely
The corresponding iterated integrals are called harmonic polylogarithms (HPLs) [27]. Possibly the first new integral is
Here we use a systematic notion defining the Poincaré iterated integrals [11, 12], unlike the case in (5). The weight w = 1 HPLs are
with the definition of \(\mathrm{H}_{0,\ldots,0}(x) {=\ln }^{n}(x)/n!\) for all x indices equal to zero. The above functions have the following representation
where the corresponding products are non-commutative, \(\mathbf{m}_{w}\) is of length k and \(x \geq z_{1} \geq \ldots \geq z_{m}\).
Harmonic polylogarithms obey algebraic and structural relations, which will be discussed in Sect. 4. Numerical representations of HPLs were given in [42, 43].
3 Harmonic Sums
The harmonic sums are recursively defined by
In physics applications they appeared early in [44, 45]. Their systematic use dates back to Refs. [25, 26]. They can be represented as a Mellin transform
where f(x) denotes a linear combination of HPLs. For example,
holds. Harmonic sums possess algebraic and structural relations, cf. Sect. 4. In the limit \(N \rightarrow \infty\) they define the multiple zeta values, cf. Sect. 5. They are originally defined at integer argument N. In physical applications they emerge in the context of the light–cone expansion [46]. The corresponding operator matrix elements are analytically continued to complex values of N either from the even or the odd integers, cf. Sect. 9.
4 Algebraic and Structural Relations
4.1 Algebraic Relations
Algebraic relations of harmonic polylogarithms and harmonic sums, respectively, are implied by their products and depend on their index structure only, i.e. they are a consequence of the associated shuffle or quasi–shuffle (stuffle) algebras [47]. These properties are widely independent of the specific realization of these algebras. To one of us (JB) it appeared as a striking surprise, when finding the determinant-formula for harmonic sums of equal argument [26] Eqs. (157,158)
also in Ramanujan’s notebook [48], but for integer sums, which clearly differ in value from the former ones. Related relations to again different quantities were given by Faá die Bruno [49].
Iterated integrals with the same argument x obey shuffle relations w.r.t. their product,
The shuffle-operation runs over all combinations of the sets \(\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{b}\) leaving the order of these sets unchanged. Likewise, the (generalized) harmonic sums obey quasi-shuffle or stuffle-relations, which are found recursively using [28, 29]
The presence of trace terms in form of lower weight products in addition to the shuffled terms, cf. [50], leads to the name stuffle relations. In case the corresponding values exist, both (23,24) can be applied to the multiple zeta values or other special numbers applying the integral and sum-representations at x = 1 and \(N \rightarrow \infty\), cf. [51]. The basis elements applying the (quasi) shuffle relations in case of the harmonic sums and polylogarithms at a given weight w can be identified by the Lyndon words [52, 53]. Let \(\mathfrak{A} =\{ a,b,c,d,\ldots \}\) be an ordered alphabet and \({\mathfrak{A}}^{{\ast}}(\mathfrak{A})\) the set of words w given as concatenation products. Under the ordering of \(\mathfrak{A}\) a Lyndon word is smaller than any of its suffixes. For example, the set \(\{a,a,a,b,b,b\},\ a <b\) is associated to the Lyndon words \(\{aaabbb,aababb,aabbab\}\). Radford showed [54] that a shuffle algebra is freely generated by the Lyndon words. The number of Lyndon words can be counted using Witt formulae [55]. Let \(\mathfrak{M}\) be a set of letters q in which the letter a k emerges n k times, and \(n =\sum _{ k=1}^{q}n_{k}\). The number of Lyndon words associated to this set is given by
Similarly one may count the basis elements occurring for all combinations at a given weight, if the alphabet has m letters:
where μ denotes Möbius’ function [56]. In case of the harmonic sums and polylogarithms one has m = 3. The original number of harmonic polylogarithms is 3w and in case of the harmonic sums \(2 \cdot {3}^{w-1}\). Algebraic relations for the harmonic polylogarithms and harmonic sums are implemented in the FORM-codes summer [25] and harmpol [27], HPL [57], and also HarmonicSums.m [29, 35].
4.2 Structural Relations
Structural relations of harmonic polylogarithms and harmonic sums are implied by operations on their arguments x and N, respectively.
4.2.1 Harmonic Polylogarithms
Harmonic polylogarithms satisfy argument-relations, as has been illustrated in (8–14) for some examples in case of the Nielsen integrals. Not all argument relations map inside the harmonic polylogarithms, however, cf. [27]. Some of them are valid only for the sub-alphabet \(\{\omega _{0},\omega _{1}\}\). While the transformation x →−x is general
with the last letter in \(\mathbf{a}\) different from 0 and p the number of non-zero letters in \(\mathbf{a}\). The transformations
apply to subsets only. Examples are:
One may transform arguments by \(x \rightarrow 1/y + i\varepsilon\),
An important general transformation is
which acts on the HPLs but not on the subset of Nielsen-integrals. An example is:
In most of these relations also HPLs at argument x = 1 contribute, cf. Sect. 5. Structural relations of HPLs are implemented in the packages harmpol [27], HPL [57], and HarmonicSums.m [29, 35].
4.2.2 Harmonic Sums
Harmonic sums obey the duplication relation
This allows to define harmonic sums at half-integer, i.e. rational, values. Ultimately, one would like to derive expressions for \(N \in \mathbb{C}\), cf. Sect. 9. Another extension is to \(N \in \mathbb{R}\) [14, 26]. The representation of harmonic sums through Mellin-transforms (20) implies analyticity for a finite range around a given value of N. The Mellin-transform of a harmonic polylogarithm can thus be differentiated for N
In turn, the shuffling relation (23) allows to represent the r.h.s. in (35) as the Mellin-transform of other HPLs. It turns out that differentiation of harmonic sums for N is closed under additional association of the multiple zeta values [14]. The number of basis elements by applying the duplication relation (H), resp. its combination with the algebraic relations is [58]
Differentiation in combination with the other relation yields
Let us close with a remark on observables or related quantities in physics which are calculated to a certain loop level and can be thoroughly expressed in terms of harmonic sums. As a detailed investigation of massless and single mass two-loop quantities showed [40] seven basic functions of up to weight w = 4, cf. [14], are sufficient to express all quantities. The three-loop anomalous dimensions [41] contributing to the \(1/\varepsilon\) poles of the corresponding matrix elements require 15 functions of up to weight w = 5 and further 20 basic functions are needed to also express the massless Wilson coefficients [7] in deep-inelastic scattering [59], cf. Ref. [60]. Despite of the complexity of these calculations finally a rather compact structure is obtained for the representation of the results. Structural relations of harmonic sums are implemented in the package HarmonicSums.m [29, 35].
5 Multiple Zeta Values
The multiple zeta values (MZVs) [61, 62]Footnote 1 are obtained by the limit \(N \rightarrow \infty\) of the harmonic sums
and may also be represented in terms of linear combinations of harmonic polylogarithms \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathbf{b}}(1)\) over the alphabet \(\{\omega _{0},\omega _{1},\omega _{-1}\}\).Footnote 2 In the former case one usually includes the divergent harmonic sums since all divergent contributions are uniquely represented in terms of polynomials in \(\sigma _{1}(\infty ) \equiv \sigma _{0}\) due to the algebraic relations. Likewise, not all harmonic polylogarithms can be calculated at x = 1, requiring their re-definition in terms of distributions. Some examples for MZVs, which already appear in case of Nielsen integrals, are:
In case of physics applications, MZVs played a role in loop calculations rather early, cf. [66]. Since for Li m (1∕2) for m = 2,3 these numbers are not elementary, (46, 47) seem to fail to provide a corresponding relation for m = 4. Similarly, for larger values of m also no reduction has been observed.
A central question concerns the representation of harmonic sums in terms of polynomial bases. This has been analyzed systematically in [63, 67].Footnote 3 For MZVs over \(\{0,1\}\) a proof on the maximum of basis elements at fixed weight w has been given in Refs. [68]. At the lowest weights the shuffle and stuffle relations imply all relations for the MZVs. Starting with weight w = 8 one also needs the duplication relation (34), and from weight w = 12 also the generalized duplication relations Sect. 4.1 in [63]. The latter are closely related to the conformal transformation relations of the HPLs at x = 1, see (32). Let us give one example for the combined use of the shuffle and stuffle relation for illustration, [51]Footnote 4:
Finally one derives a basis for the MZVs using the above relations. Up to weight w = 7 reads, cf. [25],
In [63] bases were calculated up to w = 12 for the alphabet \(\{0,1,-1\}\) and to w = 22 for the alphabet \(\{0,1\}\) in explicit form resp. for w = 24 restricting to basis elements only. In the latter case the conjecture by Zagier [62] that the shuffle, stuffle and duplication relations were the only ones was confirmed up to the weights quoted. For these cases counting relations were conjectured in Refs. [69, 70]. One may represent the basis for the MZVs over the alphabets \(\{0,1\}\) resp. \(\{0,1,-1\}\) by polynomial bases or count just the factors appearing in these polynomials of special numbers occurring newly in the corresponding weight, which is called Lyndon-basis [63]. In the first case the basis for the MZVs[\(\{0,1\}\)] is conjectured to be counted by the Padovan numbers \(\hat{P}_{k}\) [71] generated by
In case of the Lyndon basis the Perrin numbers P k appear [72]
Both the above sequences obey the Fibonacci-recurrence [73]
The length of the Lyndon basis at weight w is given by
Hoffman [74] conjectured that all MZVs over the alphabet \(\{0,1\}\) can be represented over a basis of MZVs carrying 2 and 3 as indices only. This has been confirmed up to w = 24. An explicit proof has been given in [75].
The polynomial basis of the MZVs[\(\{0,1,-1\}\)] is conjectured to be counted by the Fibonacci numbers [76]
which obey
For the corresponding Lyndon basis the counting relation
is conjectured [69, 70], where L d are the Lucas numbers [77],
There is a series of Theorems proven on the MZVs, see also [63], which can be verified using the data base [63]. The duality theorem [62] in case of the alphabet \(\{\omega _{0},\omega _{1}\}\) states
In case of the alphabet \(\{\omega _{0},\omega _{1},\omega _{-1}\}\) it is implied by the transformation (32), see [63]. Another relation is the sum theorem, Refs. [78, 79],
The sum-theorem was conjectured in [80], cf. [81]. For its derivation using the Euler connection formula for polylogarithms, cf. [82].
Further identities are given by the derivation theorem, [80, 83]. Let I = (i 1,…,i k ) any sequence of positive integers with i 1 > 1. Its derivation D(I) is given by
The derivation theorem states
where τ denotes the duality-operation, cf. (60). An index-word w is called admissible, if its first letter is not 1. The words form the set \({\mathfrak{H}}^{0}\). |w| = w is the weight and d(w) the depth of w. For the MZVs the words w are build in terms of concatenation products \(x_{0}^{i_{1}-1}x_{1}x_{0}^{i_{2}-1}x_{0}\ldots x_{0}^{i_{k}-1}x_{1}\). The height of a word, ht(w), counts the number of (non-commutative) factors \(x_{0}^{a}x_{1}^{b}\) of w. The operator D and its dual \(\overline{D}\) act as follows [84],
Define an anti-symmetric derivation
A generalization of the derivation theorem was given in [83, 85]. The identity
holds for any n ≥ 1 and any word \(w \in {\mathfrak{H}}^{0}\). Further theorems are the Le–Murakami theorem, [86], the Ohno theorem, [87], which generalizes the sum- and duality theorem, the Ohno–Zagier theorem, [88], which covers the Le–Murakami theorem and the sum theorem, which generalizes a theorem by Hoffman [80, 81], and the cyclic sum theorem, [89].
There are also relations for MZVs at repeated arguments, cf. [51, 84, 90], on which examples are:
Finally, we mention a main conjecture for the MZVs over \(\{0,1\}\). Consider tuples \(\mathbf{k} = (k_{1},\ldots,k_{r})\ \in \ {\mathbb{N}}^{r},k_{1} \geq 1\). One defines
If further
the conjecture states
-
(a)
\({\mathcal{Z}}^{\mathrm{Go}}\mathop{\cong}{\mathcal{Z}}^{\mathrm{Ca}}\). There are no relations over \(\mathbb{Q}\) between the MZVs of different weight w.
-
(b)
dim \(\mathcal{Z}_{w} = d_{w}\), with \(d_{0} = 1,d_{1} = 0,d_{2} = 1,d_{w} = d_{w-2} + d_{w-3}\).
-
(c)
All algebraic relations between MZVs are given by the extended double-shuffle relations [91], cf. also [92]. If this conjecture turns out to be true all MZVs are irrational numbers.
Let us also mention a few interesting relations for Li2(z) for special arguments found by Ramanujan [93], which are of use e.g. in massive calculations at three-loops [94]. These numbers relate to constants beyond the MZVs, which occur for generalized sums and their extension allowing for binomial and inverse binomial weights:
For further specific numbers, which occur in the context of Quantum Field Theory calculations see also Sects. 6.3, 7, and 9.
6 Generalized Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms
6.1 Generalized Harmonic Sums
Generalized harmonic sums, also called S-sums, are defined by [28, 29, 95]
and form a quasi-shuffle and a Hopf algebra [96] under the multiplication (24) [28]. The multiplication relation in general leads outside the weight sets \(\{a_{i}\},\{b_{i}\}\). The S-sums cover (together with the limit N →∞) the classical polylogarithms, the Nielsen functions, the harmonic polylogarithms, the multiple polylogarithms [97], the two-dimensional HPLs [98], and the MZVs [28]. In Ref. [28] four algorithms were presented allowing to perform the \(\varepsilon\)-expansion of classes of sums in terms of S-sums, which were coded in two packages [99, 100]. In this way the \(\varepsilon\)-expansion can be performed using convergent serial representations for the generalized hypergeometric functions P F Q , The Appell-functions F 1,2, and the Kampé de Fériet function [101].
They can be represented in terms of a Mellin transformation over \(x \in [0,x_{1}\ldots x_{k}]\) [29]. E.g. the single sums are given by
Generalized harmonic sums obey the duplication relation
where the sum on the left hand side is over the 2m possible combinations concerning ± and \(a_{i} \in \mathbb{N}\), \(b_{i} \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}\) and \(n \in \mathbb{N}\). They also obey differential relations w.r.t. N, supplementing their set with the generalized harmonic sums at infinity, resp. of the generalized harmonic polylogarithms at x = 1. The mapping will usually also require objects with different weights x i . Examples are [29]:
The counting relations for the basis elements are
where \(N_{S} = (n - 1) \cdot {n}^{w-1}\) denotes the number of sums, given n letters in the alphabet, and N A the basis elements after applying the algebraic equations. Explicit bases for a series of alphabets have been calculated in [29].
6.2 Generalized Harmonic Polylogarithms
Generalized harmonic polylogarithms are defined as the Poincaré-iterated integrals [11, 12]
For \(a_{j} \in \mathbb{R},0 <a_{j} <1,x> 1\) (82) is defined as Cauchy principal value only. Already A. Jonquière [12] has studied integrals of this type. Sometimes they are also called Chen-iterated integrals, cf. [11], or Goncharov polylogarithms [97].
The Mellin transforms of generalized harmonic polylogarithms map onto generalized harmonic sums [29]. Furthermore, the generalized harmonic polylogarithms obey various argument relations similar to the case if the HPLs, cf. Sect. 4.2.1, as
6.3 Relations Between S-Sums at Infinity
S-sums at infinity exhibit a more divergent behaviour than harmonic sums if a 1 > 1. The degree of divergence is then at least \(\propto a_{1}^{N}\), cf. Sect. 9. In the following we will discuss only convergent S-sums at infinity. They obey stuffle and shuffle relations, the duplication relation N → 2N, and the duality relations for the generalized polylogarithms [29]
Equation (88) implies
In various cases S-sums at infinity reduce to MZVs, cf. also [102],
Otherwise, new basis elements occur which have both representations in infinite sums and iterated integrals. Using the above relations bases for different sets of S-sums at infinity were calculated in [102].
7 Cyclotomic Harmonic Sums and Polylogarithms and Their Generalization
The alphabet of the harmonic polylogarithms (15) contains two differential forms with denominators, which form the first two cyclotomic polynomials: (1 − x) and (1 + x). It turns out that quantum field theoretic calculations are also related to cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms and sums [103]. Cyclotomic polynomials are defined by
and the generating alphabet reads
where Φ k (x) denotes the k th cyclotomic polynomial [104], and \(\varphi (k)\) denotes Euler’s totient function [105]. The Poincaré iterated integrals over the alphabet (98) are called cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms, cf. [30]. Due to the regularity of 1∕Φ n (x) for x ∈ [0,1], except for Φ1(x), no more singularities appear beyond those known in the case of the usual harmonic polylogarithms (or Nielsen integrals). Cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms obey shuffle relations, cf. Sect. 4.
The cyclotomic harmonic sums [30] are related to the cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms via a Mellin transform (20). The generalized cyclotomic harmonic sums are given by
where \(a_{i},c_{i} \in \mathbb{N}_{+},b_{i} \in \mathbb{N},\ \ s_{i} \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\},a_{i}> b_{i}\); the weight of this sum is defined by \(c_{1} +\ldots +c_{l}\) and \(\{a_{i},b_{i},c_{i}\}\) denote lists, not sets. If s i = ±1 these are the usual cyclotomic harmonic sums. The simplest cyclotomic sums are the single sums
i.e. harmonic sums with cyclic gaps in the summation. The cyclotomic harmonic sums obey quasi-shuffle relations (A).
Beyond this the cyclotomic harmonic sums obey structural relations implied by differentiation for the upper summation bound N, (D), which require to also consider their values at N →∞. There are, furthermore, multiple argument relations, cf. [30], decomposing \(S_{a_{i},b_{i},c_{i}}(k \cdot N)\), called synchronization (M), and two duplication relations \((H_{1},H_{2})\). Let us consider the cyclotomic harmonic sums implied by the letters
The length of the basis can be calculated by
where N S (w) denotes the number of all sums. One may calculate the asymptotic representation of the cyclotomic harmonic sums analytically. Here also the values of cyclotomic sums at N →∞ occur. The singularities of the cyclotomic harmonic sums with s k = ±1 are situated at the non-positive integers.
The cyclotomic sums for N →∞ are denoted by \(\sigma _{\{a_{1},b_{1},c_{1}\},\ldots,\{a_{l},b_{l},c_{l}\}}(s_{1},\ldots,s_{l})\). For \(\forall \ \vert s_{k}\vert \leq 1\) divergent series do only occur if a 1 = b 1 and c 1 = 1, where the degree of divergence is given by σ0 as in the case of the harmonic sums and can be represented algebraically. They are related to the values of the cyclotomic harmonic polylogarithms at x = 1. At w = 1 the regularized sums may be given in terms of ψ(k∕l) and for higher weights in terms of \({\psi }^{(m)}(k/l),m \geq 1\). If l is an integer for which the l-polygon is constructable one obtains representations in terms of algebraic numbers and logarithms of algebraic numbers, as well as π [30]. In this way, ζ2 being a basis element in case of the MZVs, looses its role. At depth w = 2 Catalan’s constant [106] with
contributes. At higher depth new numbers emerge, which partly can be given integral representations involving polylogarithms and roots of the integration variable x. The cyclotomic sums at infinity, as real representations, are closely related to the infinite generalized harmonic sums at weights s k which are roots of unity, cf. also [107]. In [30] basis representations were worked out for w = 1,2 for the l th roots, l ∈ [1,20], cf. also [108]. Counting relations for bases of the cyclotomic sums at infinity have also been derived in Ref. [30].
8 Nested Binomial and Inverse-Binomial Harmonic Sums and Associated Polylogarithms
In massive calculations further extensions to the nested sums and iterated integrals being discussed in the previous sections occur. Here summation terms of the kind \(S_{\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c}}(\mathbf{x};k)\), or their linear combinations are modulated by
building iterated sums [94]. Sums of this kind occur in case of V-type three-loop graphs for massive operator matrix elements. Simpler sums are obtained in case of three-loop graphs with two fermionic lines of equal mass. Single sums of this kind have been considered earlier, see e.g. [109]. One may envisage generalizations of (108) in choosing for the binomial a general hypergeometric term, i.e. a function, the ratio of which by all shifts of arguments being rational. The association of the corresponding iterated integrals in the foregoing cases has been found easily. Here the situation is more difficult and the functions representing these iterated sums are found in establishing differential equations [110]. It is found in the cases occurring in Ref. [94] that the corresponding differential equations finally factorize and one obtains iterated integrals over alphabets which also contain root-valued letters
beyond those occurring in case of the generalized (cyclotomic) polylogarithms. A few examples of this type have been considered in [111]. The relative transcendence of the nested sums and iterated integrals has been proven. The V-type three-loop graphs require alphabets of about 30 root-valued letters. The corresponding nested sums do partly diverge \(\propto {a}^{N},a \in \mathbb{N},a \geq 2\). A typical example for a nested binomial sums is given by:
with \(c_{3} =\sum _{ j=0}^{\infty }S_{1,2}\left (\tfrac{1} {2},-1;j\right ){(j!)}^{2}/j/(2j)!/\pi\) one of the specific constants emerging in case of these sums. Here the iterated integrals H∗ extend to x = 1 as firm bound, contrary to the cases discussed before where x = 0 is chosen. Here the new letters w k are
The representations over the letters (109) are needed to eliminate the power growth \(\propto {a}^{N}\) of these sums and can be used to derive the asymptotic representation at large values of N. While the terms \(\propto {8}^{N}\) and \(\propto {4}^{N}\) cancel, it may occur that individual scalar diagrams exhibit contributions \(\propto {2}^{N}\), cf. [94]. This behaviour is expected to cancel in the complete physics result.
9 Analytic Continuation of Harmonic Sums
The loop-corrections to various physical quantities take a particular simple form in Mellin-space being expressed in terms of harmonic sums and their generalizations. Moreover, in this representation the renormalization group equations can be solved analytically, cf. [59, 112]. For a wide variety of non-perturbative parton distributions Mellin-space representations can be given as well, see e.g. [113].
Thus one obtains complete representations for observables in N-space. In case of the perturbative part, the singularities are situated at the integers N ≤ N 0, with usually N 0 = 1, see e.g. [114]. The harmonic sums possess a unique polynomial representation in terms of the sum S 1(N) and harmonic sums which can be represented as Mellin transforms having a representation by factorial series [115, 116]. They are transformed to x-space by a single precise numerical contour integral around the singularities of the problem to compare with the data measured in experiment. The analytic continuation of the perturbative evolution kernels and Wilson coefficients from even or odd integers to complex values of N is unique [117].Footnote 5 To perform this integral a representation of the harmonic sums for \(N \in \mathbb{C}\) is required. Accurate numeric representations up to w = 5 have been given in [118], see also [119]. Arbitrary precise representations can be obtained using the analytic expressions for the asymptotic representation [14, 60] together with the recursion relations given in Sect. 3. These are given up to w = 8 in [58]. A path to perform the inverse Mellin transform
is shown in Fig. 2. The asymptotic representations can also be obtained in analytic form for the S-sums [29], cyclotomic (S)-sums [30], as well as for the nested binomial cyclotomic S-sums [94, 110].
In case the expressions in N-space result from Mellin transforms of functions f(x) ∼ x α,α ∈]0,1[ the singularities are shifted by α. This is usually the case for the non-perturbative parton distribution functions, but also in case of some root-valued harmonic polylogarithms considered in Sect. 8.
The inverse Mellin-transform cannot be performed in the above way for integrands which do not vanish sufficiently fast enough as |N|→∞. Contributions of this kind are those leading to distribution-valued terms in x-space as to δ(1 − x), [lnk(1 − x)∕(1 − x)]+ the Dirac δ-distribution and the +-distribution defined by
Also for terms which grow like \({a}^{N},a \in \mathbb{R},a> 1\) in N-space, the Mellin transform cannot be performed numerically in general. They are not supposed to emerge in physical observables. The physical quantities in hadronic scattering contain the parton distribution functions, which, however, damp according contributions occurring in the evolution kernels sufficiently. On the other hand, the inverse Mellin transform can always be performed analytically changing form nested sum-representations in N-space to iterated integral representations in x-space as has been outlined before.
10 Conclusions
Feynman integrals in Quantum Field Theories generate a hierarchic series of special functions, which allow their unique representation. They emerge in terms of special nested sums, iterated integrals and numbers. Their variety gradually extends enlarging the number of loops and legs, as well as the associated mass scales. The systematic exploration of these structures has been started about 15 years ago and several levels of complexity have been unraveled since. The relations of the various associated sums and integrals are schematically illustrated in Fig. 3 and are widely explored. Many relations are implied by the shuffle resp. stuffle algebras, others are structural relations. The number of relations grows with the number of admissible operations.
A large amount of transformations and relations between the different quantities being discussed in this article are encoded in the package HarmonicSums [29, 35] for public use. For newly emerging structures the algebraic relations are easily generalized but they will usually apply structural relations of a new kind. With the present programme revealing their strict (atomic) structure, they are fully explored analytically and Feynman’s original approach to completely organize the calculation of observables in Quantum Field Theory is currently extended to massive calculations at the three-loop level in Quantum Electrodynamics and Quantum Chromodynamics at the perturbative side. For these quantities efficient numerical representations have to be derived. Working in Mellin space the treatment may even remain completely analytic, in a very elegant way, up to a single final numerical contour integral around the singularities of the problem, cf. Sect. 9.
Despite of the achievements being obtained many more physical classes still await their systematic exploration in the future. It is clear, however, that the various concrete structures are realized as combinations of words over certain alphabets, which may be called the genetic code of the microcosm [120].
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The numbers associated with this alphabet are sometimes also called Euler-Zagier values and those of the sub-alphabet \(\{\omega _{0},\omega _{1}\}\) multiple zeta values.
- 3.
For some aspects of the earlier development including results by the Leuven-group, Zagier, Broadhurst, Vermaseren and the Lille-group, see [63].
- 4.
Here the \(\zeta _{\mathbf{a}}\)-values are defined \(\zeta _{a_{1},\ldots,a_{m}} =\sum _{ n_{1}>n_{2}>\ldots>n_{m}}^{\infty }\prod _{k=1}^{m}n_{k}^{-a_{1}}\).
- 5.
For a detailed proof also in case of generalized harmonic sums see [29].
References
Lense, J.: Reihenentwicklungen in der Mathematischen Physik. Walter de Gryter, Berlin (1953)
Sommerfeld, A.: Partielle Differentialgleichungen der Physik. In: Vorlesungen über Theoreti- sche Physik, vol. VI. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest and Prtig, Leipzig (1958)
Forsyth, A.R.: Theory of Differential Equations, pp. 2–4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1900–1902);Kamke, E.: Differentialgleichungen, Lösungsmethoden und Lösungen. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest and Portig, Leipzig (1967)
Kratzer, A., Franz, W.: Transzendente Funktionen. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest and Portig, Leipzig (1963)
Andrews, G.E., Askey, R., Roy, R.: Special Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Nakanishi, N.: Parametric integral formulas and analytic properties in perturbation theory. Suppl. Progr. Theor. Phys. 18, 1–125 (1961); Graph Theory and Feynman Integrals. Gordon and Breach, New York (1970);Bogner, C., Weinzierl, S.: Feynman graph polynomials. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25, 2585–2618 (2010). [arXiv:1002.3458 [hep-ph]];Weinzierl, S.: (this volume)
Vermaseren, J.A.M., Vogt, A., Moch, S.: The third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange. Nucl. Phys. B 724, 3–182 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0504242] and refences therein
Bierenbaum, I., Blümlein, J., Klein, S.: Mellin moments of the O(α s 3) heavy flavor contributions to unpolarized deep-inelastic scattering at \({Q}^{2} \gg {m}^{2}\) and anomalous dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 820, 417–482 (2009). [arXiv: 0904.3563 [hep-ph]]
Kontsevich, M., Zagier, D.: Periods. IMHS/M/01/22. In: Engquist, B., Schmid, W. (eds.) Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and Beyond, pp. 771–808. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Bogner, C., Weinzierl, S.: Periods and Feynman integrals. J. Math. Phys. 50, 042302 (2009). [arXiv:0711.4863 [hep-th]]
Poincaré, H.: Sur les groupes des équations linéaires. Acta Math. 4, 201–312 (1884);Lappo-Danilevsky, J.A.: Mémoirs sur la Théorie des Systèmes Différentielles Linéaires. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York (1953);Chen, K.T.: Algebras of iterated path integrals and fundamental groups. Trans. A.M.S. 156(3), 359–379 (1971)
Jonquière, A.: Über einige Transcendente, welche bei der wiederholten Integration rationaler Funktionen auftreten. Bihang till Kongl. Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 15, 1–50 (1889)
Mellin, H.: Über die fundamentale Wichtigkeit des Satzes von Cauchy für die Theorien der Gamma- und hypergeometrischen Funktionen. Acta Soc. Fennicae 21, 1–115 (1886); Über den Zusammenhang zwischen den linearen Differential- und Differenzengleichungen. Acta Math. 25, 139–164 (1902)
Blümlein, J.: Structural relations of harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to weight w = 5. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2218–2249 (2009). [arXiv:0901.3106 [hep-ph]]
Blümlein, J., Klein, S., Schneider, C., Stan, F.: A symbolic summation approach to Feynman integral calculus. J. Symb. Comput. 47, 1267–1289 (2012). [arXiv:1011.2656 [cs.SC]]
Barnes, E.W.: A new development of the theory of the hypergeometric functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 6(2), 141 (1908); A transformation of generalized hypergeometric series. Quart. Journ. Math. 41, 136–140 (1910);Mellin, H.: Abriß einer einheitlichen Theorie der Gamma- und der hypergeometrischen Funktionen. Math. Ann. 68, 305–337 (1910)
Gluza, J., Kajda, K., Riemann, T.: AMBRE: a mathematica package for the construction of Mellin-Barnes representations for Feynman integrals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 177, 879–893 (2007). [arXiv:0704.2423 [hep-ph]]
’t Hooft, G., Veltman, M.J.G.: Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields. Nucl. Phys. B 44, 189–213 (1972);Bollini, C.G., Giambiagi, J.J.: Dimensional renormalization: the number of dimensions as a regularizing parameter. Nuovo Cim. B 12, 20–26 (1972);Ashmore, J.F.: A method of gauge invariant regularization. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4, 289–290 (1972);Cicuta, G.M., Montaldi, E.: Analytic renormalization via continuous space dimension. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4, 329–332 (1972)
Berends, F.A., van Neerven, W.L., Burgers, G.J.H.: Higher order radiative corrections at LEP energies. Nucl. Phys. B 297, 429–478 (1988). [Erratum-ibid. B 304, 921 (1988)];Blümlein, J., De Freitas, A., van Neerven, W.: Two-loop QED operator matrix elements with massive external fermion lines. Nucl. Phys. B 855, 508–569 (2012). [arXiv:1107.4638 [hep-ph]];Hamberg, R., van Neerven, W.L., Matsuura, T.: A complete calculation of the order α s 2 correction to the Drell-Yan K-factor. Nucl. Phys. B 359, 343–405 (1991). [Erratum-ibid. B 644, 403–404 (2002)];Zijlstra, E.B., van Neerven, W.L.: Contribution of the second order gluonic Wilson coefficient to the deep inelastic structure function. Phys. Lett. B 273, 476–482 (1991); O(α s 2) contributions to the deep inelastic Wilson coefficient. Phys. Lett. B 272, 127–133 (1991); O(α s 2) QCD corrections to the deep inelastic proton structure functions F 2 and F L . Nucl. Phys. B 383, 525–574 (1992); O(α s 2) corrections to the polarized structure function g 1(x,Q 2). Nucl. Phys. B 417, 61–100 (1994). [Erratum-ibid. B 426, 245 (1994)], [Erratum-ibid. B 773, 105–106 (2007)];Kazakov, D.I., Kotikov, A.V.: Totalas correction to deep-inelastic scattering cross section ratio R = σ L ∕σ T in QCD. Calculation of the longitudinal structure function. Nucl. Phys. B 307, 721–762 (1988). [Erratum-ibid. B 345, 299 (1990)];Kazakov, D.I., Kotikov, A.V., Parente, G., Sampayo, O.A., Sanchez Guillen, J.: Complete quartic (α s 2) correction to the deep inelastic longitudinal structure function F L in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1535–1538 (1990). [Erratum-ibid. 65, 2921 (1990)];Sanchez Guillen, J., Miramontes, J., Miramontes, M., Parente, G., Sampayo, O.A.: Next-toleading order analysis of the deep inelastic R = σ L ∕σ total . Nucl. Phys. B 353, 337–345 (1991)
Leibniz, G.W.: Mathematische Schriften. In: Gerhardt C.J. (ed.) vol. III, p. 351. Verlag H.W.Schmidt, Halle (1858);Euler, L.: Institutiones calculi integralis, vol. I, pp. 110–113. Impensis Academiae Imperialis Scientiarum, Petropoli (1768); Mémoires de l’Académie de Sint-P’etersbourg (1809–1810), vol. 3, pp. 26–42 (1811);Landen, J.: A new method of computing sums of certain series. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 51, 553–565 (1760); Mathematical Memoirs, p. 112 (Printed for the Author, Nourse, J., London, 1780);Lewin, L.: Dilogarithms and Associated Functions. Macdonald, London (1958);Kirillov, A.N.: Dilogarithm identities. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 118, 61–142 (1995). [hep-th/9408113];Maximon, L.C.: The dilogarithm function for complex argument. Proc. R. Soc. A 459, 2807–2819 (2003);Zagier, D.: The remarkable dilogarithm. J. Math. Phys. Sci. 22, 131–145 (1988); In: Cartier, P., Julia, B., Moussa et al., P. (eds.) Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry II – On Conformal Field Theories, Discrete Groups and Renormalization, pp. 3–65. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Spence, W.: An Essay of the Theory of the Various Orders of Logarithmic Transcendents. John Murray, London (1809)
Kummer, E.E.: Ueber die Transcendenten, welche aus wiederholten Integrationen rationaler Formeln entstehen. J. für Math. (Crelle) 21, 74–90 (1840)
Lewin, L.: Polylogarithms and Associated Functions. North Holland, New York (1981);Devoto, A., Duke, D.W.: Table of integrals and formulae for Feynman diagram calculations. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 7(6), 1–39 (1984)
Nielsen, N.: Der Eulersche Dilogarithmus und seine Verallgemeinerungen. Nova Acta Leopold. XC Nr. 3, 125–211 (1909);Kölbig, K.S., Mignoco, J.A., Remiddi, E.: On Nielsen’s generalized polylogarithms and their numerical calculation. BIT 10, 38–74 (1970);Kölbig, K.S.: Nielsen’s generalized polylogarithms. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17, 1232–1258 (1986)
Vermaseren, J.A.M.: Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 2037–2076 (1999). [hep-ph/9806280]
Blümlein, J., Kurth, S.: Harmonic sums and Mellin transforms up to two loop order. Phys. Rev. D 60, 014018 (1999). [hep-ph/9810241]
Remiddi, E., Vermaseren, J.A.M.: Harmonic polylogarithms. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 725–754 (2000). [hep-ph/9905237]
Moch, S.-O., Uwer, P., Weinzierl, S.: Nested sums, expansion of transcendental functions and multiscale multiloop integrals. J. Math. Phys. 43, 3363–3386 (2002). [hep-ph/0110083]
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Schneider, C.: Analytic and algorithmic aspects of generalized harmonic sums and polylogarithms. [arXiv:1302.0378 [math-ph]]
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Schneider, C.: Harmonic sums and polylogarithms generated by cyclotomic polynomials. J. Math. Phys. 52, 102301 (2011). [arXiv:1105.6063 [math-ph]]
Laporta, S.: High precision \(\varepsilon\)-expansions of massive four loop vacuum bubbles Phys. Lett. B 549, 115–122 (2002). [hep-ph/0210336]; Analytical expressions of 3 and 4-loop sunrise Feynman integrals and 4-dimensional lattice integrals. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 5007–5020 (2008). [arXiv:0803.1007 [hep-ph]];Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M., Broadhurst, D., Glasser, M.L.: Elliptic integral evaluations of Bessel moments. [arXiv:0801.0891 [hep-th]];Müller-Stach, S., Weinzierl, S., Zayadeh, R.: Picard-Fuchs equations for Feynman integrals. [arXiv:1212.4389 [hep-ph]];Adams, L., Bogner, C., Weinzierl, S.: The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses. [arXiv:1302.7004 [hep-ph]]
Schneider, C.: The summation package sigma: underlying principles and a rhombus tiling application. Discret. Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 6, 365–386 (2004); Solving parameterized linear difference equations in terms of indefinite nested sums and products. Differ, J.: Equ. Appl. 11(9), 799–821 (2005); A new sigma approach to multi-summation. Adv. Appl. Math. 34(4), 740–767 (2005); Product representations in ΠΣ-fields. Ann. Comb. 9(1), 75–99 (2005); Symbolic summation assists combinatorics. Sem. Lothar. Combin. 56, 1–36 (2007); A refined difference field theory for symbolic summation. J. Symb. Comp. 43(9), 611–644 (2008). arXiv:0808.2543 [cs.SC]; Parameterized telescoping proves algebraic independence of sums. Ann. Comb. 14(4), 533–552 (2010). [arXiv:0808.2596 [cs.SC]]; Structural theorems for symbolic summation. Appl. Algebra Eng. Comm. Comput. 21(1), 1–32 (2010); A symbolic summation approach to find optimal nested sum representations. In: Carey, A., Ellwood, D., Paycha, S., Rosenberg, S. (eds.) Motives, Quantum Field Theory, and Pseudodifferential Operators, vol. 12, pp. 285–308. Clay Mathematics Proceedings. American Mathematical Society (2010). [arXiv:0904.2323 [cs.SC]]; and this volume
Bronstein, M.: Symbolic Integration I: Transcendental Functions. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Raab, C.: Definite integration in differential fields. PhD thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz (2012); and this volume
Ablinger, J.: A computer algebra toolbox for harmonic sums related to particle physics. Master’s thesis, Johannes Kepler University (2009). [arXiv:1011.1176 [math-ph]]; Computer algebra algorithms for special functions in particle physics. PhD thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz (2012)
Feynman, R.P.: Space - time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. 76, 769–789 (1949)
Napier, J.: Mirifici logarithmorum canonis descriptio, ejusque usus, in utraque trigonometria; ut etiam in omni logistica mathematica, amplissimi, facillimi, & expeditissimi explacatio. Andrew Hart, Edinburgh (1614)
Racah, G.: Sopra l’rradiazione nell’urto di particelle veloci. Nuovo Com. 11, 461–476 (1934)
Fleischer, J., Kotikov, A.V., Veretin, O.L.: Analytic two loop results for selfenergy type and vertex type diagrams with one nonzero mass. Nucl. Phys. B 547, 343–374 (1999). [hep-ph/9808242]
Blümlein, J., Ravindran, V.: Mellin moments of the next-to-next-to leading order coefficient functions for the Drell-Yan process and hadronic Higgs-boson production. Nucl. Phys. B 716, 128–172 (2005). [hep-ph/0501178]; O(α s 2) timelike Wilson coefficients for parton-fragmentation functions in Mellin space. Nucl. Phys. B 749, 1–24 (2006). [hep-ph/0604019];Blümlein, J., Klein, S.: Structural relations between harmonic sums up to w=6. PoS ACAT 084 (2007). [arXiv:0706.2426 [hep-ph]];Bierenbaum, I., Blümlein, J., Klein, S., Schneider, C.: Two-loop massive operator matrix elements for unpolarized heavy flavor production to O(\(\varepsilon\)). Nucl. Phys. B 803, 1–41 (2008). [arXiv:0803.0273 [hep-ph]];Czakon, M., Gluza, J., Riemann, T.: Master integrals for massive two-loop Bhabha scattering in QED. Phys. Rev. D 71, 073009 (2005). [hep-ph/0412164]
Moch, S., Vermaseren, J.A.M., Vogt, A.: The three loop splitting functions in QCD: the non-singlet case. Nucl. Phys. B 688, 101–134 (2004). [hep-ph/0403192]; The three-loop splitting functions in QCD: the Singlet case. Nucl. Phys. B 691, 129–181 (2004). [hep-ph/0404111]
Gehrmann, T., Remiddi, E.: Numerical evaluation of harmonic polylogarithms. Comput. Phys. Commun. 141, 296–312 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0107173]
Vollinga, J., Weinzierl, S.: Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms. Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 177–194 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0410259]
Gonzalez-Arroyo, A., Lopez, C., Yndurain, F.J.: Second order contributions to the structure functions in deep inelastic scattering. 1. Theoretical calculations. Nucl. Phys. B 153, 161–186 (1979);Floratos, E.G., Kounnas, C., Lacaze, R.: Higher order QCD effects in inclusive annihilation and deep inelastic scattering. Nucl. Phys. B 192, 417–462 (1981)
Mertig, R., van Neerven, W.L.: The calculation of the two loop spin splitting functions P ij (1)(x). Z. Phys. C 70, 637–654 (1996). [hep-ph/9506451]
Wilson, K.G.: Non-lagrangian models of current algebra. Phys. Rev. 179, 1499–1512 (1969); Zimmermann, W.: Lecture on Elementary Particle Physics and Quantum Field Theory, Brandeis Summer Institute, vol. 1, p. 395. MIT Press, Cambridge (1970); Brandt, R.A., Preparata, G.: The light cone and photon-hadron interactions. Fortsch. Phys. 20, 571–594 (1972); Frishman, Y.: Operator products at almost light like distances. Ann. Phys. 66, 373–389 (1971); Blümlein, J., Kochelev, N.: On the twist-2 and twist-three contributions to the spin dependent electroweak structure functions. Nucl. Phys. B 498, 285–309 (1997). [hep-ph/9612318]
Hoffman, M.E.: Quasi-shuffle products. J. Algebraic Combin. 11, 49–68 (2000). [arXiv:math/9907173 [math.QA]]; The Hopf algebra structure of multiple harmonic sums. Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 135, 215 (2004). [arXiv:math/0406589]
Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Notebooks, Part I. Springer, Berlin (1985)
Faà di Bruno, F.: Einleitung in die Theorie dier Binären Formen, deutsche Bearbeitung von Th. Walter. Teubner, Leipzig (1881)
Blümlein, J.: Algebraic relations between harmonic sums and associated quantities. Comput. Phys. Commun. 159, 19–54 (2004). [hep-ph/0311046]
Borwein, J.M., Bradley, D.M., Broadhurst, D.J., Lisonek, P.: Special values of multiple polylogarithms. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 353, 907–941 (2001). [math/9910045 [math-ca]]
Lyndon, R.C.: On Burnsides problem. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 77, 202–215 (1954); On Burnsides problem II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 78, 329–332 (1955)
Reutenauer, C.: Free Lie algebras. University Press, Oxford (1993)
Radford, D.E.: J. Algebra 58, 432–454 (1979)
Witt, E.: Treue Darstellung Liescher Ringe. J. Reine und Angew. Math. 177, 152–160 (1937); Die Unterringe der freien Lieschen Ringe. Math. Zeitschr. 64, 195–216 (1956)
Möbius, A.F.: Über eine besondere Art von Umkehrung der Reihen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 9, 105–123 (1832);Hardy, G.H., Wright, E.M.: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th edn. Calendron Press, Oxford (1978)
Maitre, D.: HPL, a mathematica implementation of the harmonic polylogarithms. Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 222–240 (2006). [hep-ph/0507152]
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Schneider, C.: DESY 13-064
Blümlein, J.: The theory of deeply inelastic scattering. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 69, 28 (2013). [arXiv:1208.6087 [hep-ph]]
Blümlein, J.: Structural relations of harmonic sums and Mellin transforms at weight w = 6. In: Carey, A., Ellwood, D., Paycha, S., Rosenberg, S. (eds.) Motives, Quantum Field Theory, and Pseudodifferential Operators, vol. 12, pp. 167–186. Clay Mathematics Proceedings, American Mathematical Society (2010). [arXiv:0901.0837 [math-ph]].
Euler, L.: Meditationes circa singulare serium genus. Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 20, 140–186 (1776)
Zagier, D.: Values of zeta functions and their applications. In: First European Congress of Mathematics (Paris, 1992), vol. II. Prog. Math. 120, 497–512 (Birkhäuser, Basel–Boston) (1994)
Blümlein, J., Broadhurst, D.J., Vermaseren, J.A.M.: The multiple zeta value data mine. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 582–625 (2010). [arXiv:0907.2557 [math-ph]] and references therein
Hoffman, M.E.: Hoffman’s page. http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/~meh/biblio.html
Fischler, S.: Irrationalité de valeurs de zéta. Sém. Bourbaki, Novembre 2002, exp. no. 910. Asterisque 294, 27–62 (2004) http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~fischler/publi.html; Colmez, P.: Arithmetique de la fonction zêta. In: Journées X-UPS 2002. La fontion zêta. Editions de l’Ecole polytechnique, pp. 37–164. Paris (2002). http://www.math.polytechnique.fr/xups/vol02.html;Waldschmidt, M.: Multiple polylogarithms: an introduction. In: Agarwal, A.K., Berndt, B.C., Krattenthaler, C.F., Mullen, G.L., Ramachandra, K., Waldschmidt, M. (eds.) Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics, pp. 1–12. Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi (2002);Waldschmidt, M.: Valeurs zêta multiples. Une introduction. Journal de théorie des nombres de Bordeaux 12(2), 581–595 (2000);Huttner, M., Petitot, M.: Arithmeétique des fonctions d’zetas et Associateur de Drinfel’d. UFR de Mathématiques, Lille (2005)Hertling, C.: AG Mannheim-Heidelberg, SS2007;Cartier, P.: Fonctions polylogarithmes, nombres polyzêtas et groupes pro-unipotents. Sém. Bourbaki, Mars 2001, 53e année, exp. no. 885. Asterisque 282, 137–173 (2002)
Barbieri, R., Mignaco, J.A., Remiddi, E.: Electron form-factors up to fourth order. 1. Nuovo Cim. A 11, 824–864 (1972);Levine, M.J., Remiddi, E., Roskies, R.: Analytic contributions to the G factor of the electron in sixth order. Phys. Rev. D 20, 2068–2076 (1979)
Kuipers, J., Vermaseren, J.A.M.: About a conjectured basis for multiple zeta values. [arXiv:1105.1884 [math-ph]]
Goncharov, A.B.: Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives. [arxiv:math.AG/0103059];Terasoma, T.: Mixed Tate motives and multiple zeta values. Invent. Math. 149(2), 339–369 (2002). arxiv:math.AG/010423;Deligne, P., Goncharov, A.B.: Groupes fondamentaux motiviques de Tate mixtes. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. Série IV 38(1), 1–56 (2005)
Broadhurst, D.J.: On the enumeration of irreducible k-fold Euler sums and their roles in knot theory and field theory. [arXiv:hep-th/9604128]
Broadhurst, D.J., Kreimer, D.: Association of multiple zeta values with positive knots via Feynman diagrams up to 9 loops. Phys. Lett. B 393, 403–412 (1997). [arXiv:hep-th/9609128]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padovan_sequence;http://www.emis.de/journals/NNJ/conferences/N2002-Padovan.html
Perrin, R.: Item 1484, L’Intermédiare des Math. 6, 76–77 (1899);Williams, A., Shanks, D.: Strong primality tests that are not sufficient. Math. Comput. 39(159), 255–300 (1982)
de filiis Bonaccij, L.P.: Liber abaci, Cap. 12.7. Pisa (1202);Sigler, L.E.: Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Hoffman, M.E.: The algebra of multiple harmonic series. J. Algebra 194, 477–495 (1997)
Brown, F.: Mixed tate motives over Z. Ann. Math. 175(1), 949–976 (2012)
The formula goes back to de Moivre, Bernoulli, Euler, and later Binet, see: Beutelspacher, A., Petri, B.: Der Goldene Schnitt. Spektrum, Heidelberg (1988)
Lucas, E.: Théorie des fonctions numériques simplement périodiques. Am. J. Math. 1, 197–240 (1878)
Euler, L.: Meditationes circa singulare serium genus. Novi Comm. Acad. Sci. Petropol. 20, 140–186 (1775). (reprinted in Opera Omnia Ser I, vol. 15, pp. 217–267. B.G. Teubner, Berlin (1927))
Hoffman, M. E., Moen, C.: Sums of triple harmonic series. J. Number Theory 60, 329–331 (1996);Granville, A.: A decomposition of Riemann’s zeta-function. In: Motohashi, Y. (ed.) Analytic Number Theory, London Mathematical Society. Lecture Note Series, vol. 247, pp. 95–101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997); Zagier, D.: Multiple Zeta Values. (preprint)
Hoffman, M.E.: Multiple harmonic series. Pac. J. Math. 152, 275–290 (1992)
Hoffman, M.E.: Algebraic aspects of multiple zeta values. In: Aoki et al., T. (eds.) Zeta Functions, Topology and Quantum Physics. Developments in Mathematics, vol. 14, pp. 51–74. Springer, New York (2005). [arXiv:math/0309452 [math.QA]]
Okuda, J., Ueno, K.: The sum formula of multiple zeta values and connection problem of the formal Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov equation. In: Aoki et al., T. (eds.) Zeta Functions, Topology and Quantum Physics. Developments in Mathematics, vol. 14, pp. 145–170. Springer, New York (2005). [arXiv:math/0310259 [math.NT]]
Hoffmann, M.E., Ohno, Y.: Relations of multiple zeta values and their algebraic expressions. J. Algebra 262, 332–347 (2003)
Zudilin, V.V.: Algebraic relations for multiple zeta values. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 58(1), 3–22
Ihara, K., Kaneko, M.: A note on relations of multiple zeta values (preprint)
Le, T.Q.T., Murakami, J.: Kontsevich’s integral for the Homfly polynomial and relations between values of multiple zeta functions. Topol. Appl. 62, 193–206 (1995)
Ohno, Y.: A generalization of the duality and sum formulas on the multiple zeta values. J. Number Theory 74, 189–209 (1999)
Ohno, Y., Zagier, D.: Indag. Math. (N.S.) 12, 483–487 (2001)
Ohno, Y., Wakabayashi, N.: Cyclic sum of multiple zeta values. Acta Arithmetica 123, 289–295 (2006)
Borwein, J.M., Bradley, D.M., Broadhurst, D.J.: Evaluations of K fold Euler/Zagier sums: a compendium of results for arbitrary k. [hep-th/9611004]
Ihara, K., Kaneko, M., Zagier, D.: Derivation and double shuffle relations for multiple zeta values. Compositio Math. 142, 307–338 (2006); Preprint MPIM2004-100
Écalle, J.: Théorie des moules, vol. 3, prépublications mathématiques d‘Orsay (1981, 1982, 1985); La libre génération des multicêtas et leur d’ecomposition canonico-explicite en irréductibles, automne (1999); Ari/gari et la décomposition des multizêtas en irréductibles. Prépublication, avril (2000)
Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Notebooks, Part IV, pp. 323–326. Springer, New York (1994)
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Raab, C., Schneider, C., Wißbrock, F.: DESY 13–063
Weinzierl, S.: Feynman Graphs. [arXiv:1301.6918 [hep-ph]]
Hopf, H.: Über die Topologie der Gruppen-Mannigfaltigkeiten und ihrer Verallgemeinerungen. Ann. Math. 42, 22–52 (1941);Milner, J., Moore, J.: On the structure of Hopf algebras. Ann. Math. 81, 211–264 (1965);Sweedler, M.E.: Hopf Algebras. Benjamin, New York (1969)
Goncharov, A.B.: Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes. Math. Res. Lett. 5, 497–516 (1998). [arXiv:1105.2076 [math.AG]]
Gehrmann, T., Remiddi, E.: Two loop master integrals for γ∗ → 3 jets: the planar topologies. Nucl. Phys. B 601, 248–286 (2001). [hep-ph/0008287]; Numerical evaluation of twodimensional harmonic polylogarithms. Comput. Phys. Commun. 144, 200–223 (2002). [hep-ph/0111255]
Weinzierl, S.: Symbolic expansion of transcendental functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 145, 357–370 (2002). [math-ph/0201011]
Moch, S.-O., Uwer, P.: XSummer: transcendental functions and symbolic summation in FORM. Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 759–770 (2006). [math-ph/0508008]
Appell, P.: Sur Les Fonctions Hypérgéometriques de Plusieurs Variables. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1925);Appell, P., Kampé de Fériet, J.: Fonctions Hypérgéometriques; Polynômes d’Hermite. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1926);Bailey, W.N.: Generalized Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1935);Erdélyi, A. (ed.): Higher Transcendental Functions, Bateman Manuscript Project, vol. I. McGraw-Hill, New York (1953);Exton, H.: Multiple Hypergeometric Functions and Applications. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester (1976); Handbook of Hypergeometric Integrals. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester (1978);Slater, L.J.: Generalized Hypergeometric Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1966);Schlosser, H.: (this volume);Anastasiou, C., Glover, E.W.N., Oleari, C.: Application of the negative dimension approach to massless scalar box integrals. Nucl. Phys. B 565, 445–467 (2000). [hep-ph/9907523]; Scalar one loop integrals using the negative dimension approach. Nucl. Phys. B 572, 307–360 (2000). [hep-ph/9907494];Glover, E.W.N.: (this volume)
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Hasselhuhn, A., Klein, S., Schneider, C., Wißbrock, F.: Massive 3-loop ladder diagrams for quarkonic local operator matrix elements. Nucl. Phys. B 864, 52–84 (2012). [arXiv:1206.2252 [hep-ph]]
Ablinger, J., et al.: New results on the 3-loop heavy Flavor Wilson coefficients in deep-inelastic scattering. [arXiv:1212.5950 [hep-ph]]; Three-loop contributions to the gluonic massive operator matrix elements at general values of N. PoS LL 2012, 033 (2012). [arXiv:1212.6823 [hep-ph]]
Lang, S.: Algebra, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2002)
Euler, L.: Theoremata arithmetica nova methodo demonstrata. Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis Petropolitanae, vol. 8, pp. 74–104 (1760/1, 1763); Opera Omnia, Ser. I, vol. 2, pp. 531–555. Takase, M.: Euler’s Theory of Numbers In: Baker, R. (ed.) Euler Reconsidered, pp. 377–421. Kedrick Press, Heber City (2007). leonhardeuler.web.fc2.com/eulernumber_en.pdf
Catalan, E.: Recherches sur la constant G, et sur les integrales euleriennes. Mémoires de l’Academie imperiale des sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, Ser. 7(31), 1–51 (1883);Adamchik, V. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~adamchik/articles/catalan/catalan.htm
Broadhurst, D.J.: Massive three - loop Feynman diagrams reducible to SC ∗ primitives of algebras of the sixth root of unity. Eur. Phys. J. C 8 311–333 (1999). [hep-th/9803091]
Racinet, G.: Torseurs associes a certaines relations algebriques entre polyzetas aux racines de l’unite. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences. Série 1, Mathématique 333(1), 5–10 (2001). [arXiv:math.QA/0012024]
Davydychev, A.I., Kalmykov, M.Y.: Massive Feynman diagrams and inverse binomial sums. Nucl. Phys. B 699, 3–64 (2004). [hep-th/0303162];Weinzierl, S.: Expansion around half integer values, binomial sums and inverse binomial sums. J. Math. Phys. 45, 2656–2673 (2004). [hep-ph/0402131];Kalmykov, M.Y.: Gauss’ hypergeometric function: Reduction, \(\varepsilon\)-expansion for integer/halfinteger parameters and Feynman diagrams. JHEP 0604, 056 (2006). [hep-th/0602028];Huber, T., Maitre, D.: Expanding hypergeometric functions about half-integer parameters. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 755–776 (2008). [arXiv:0708.2443 [hep-ph]]
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J., Raab, C., Schneider, C.: (in preparation)
Aglietti, U., Bonciani, R.: Master integrals with 2 and 3 massive propagators for the 2 loop electroweak form-factor - planar case. Nucl. Phys. B 698, 277–318 (2004). [hep-ph/0401193];Bonciani, R., Degrassi, G., Vicini, A.: On the generalized harmonic polylogarithms of one complex variable. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 1253–1264 (2011). [arXiv:1007.1891 [hep-ph]]
Symanzik, K.: Small distance behavior in field theory and power counting. Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 227–246 (1970);Callan, C.G., Jr.: Broken scale invariance in scalar field theory. Phys. Rev. D 2, 1541–1547 (1970)
Blümlein, J., Hasselhuhn, A., Kovacikova, P., Moch, S.: O(α s ) heavy flavor corrections to charged current deep-inelastic scattering in Mellin space. Phys. Lett. B 700, 294–304 (2011). [arXiv:1104.3449 [hep-ph]]
Blümlein, J., Vogt, A.: The evolution of unpolarized singlet structure functions at small x. Phys. Rev. D 58, 014020 (1998). [hep-ph/9712546]
Nielsen, N.: Handbuch der Theorie der Gammafunktion. Teubner, Leipzig (1906); Reprinted by Chelsea Publishing Company, Bronx, New York (1965)
Landau, E.: Über die Grundlagen der Theorie der Fakultätenreihen, S.-Ber. math.-naturw. Kl. Bayerische Akad. Wiss. München, 36, 151–218 (1906)
Carlson, F.D.: Sur une classe de séries de Taylor. PhD thesis, Uppsala University (1914);see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlson/%27s_theorem
Blümlein, J.: Analytic continuation of Mellin transforms up to two loop order. Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 76–104 (2000). [hep-ph/0003100];Blümlein, J., Moch, S.-O.: Analytic continuation of the harmonic sums for the 3-loop anomalous dimensions. Phys. Lett. B 614, 53–61 (2005). [hep-ph/0503188]
Kotikov, A.V., Velizhanin, V.N.: Analytic continuation of the Mellin moments of deep inelastic structure functions. [hep-ph/0501274]
Blümlein, J., Riemann, T., Schneider, C.: DESY Annual Report (2013)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank D. Broadhurst, F. Brown, A. De Freitas, E.W.N. Glover, A. Hasselhuhn, D. Kreimer, C. Raab, C. Schneider, S. Weinzierl, F. Wißbrock, and J. Vermaseren for discussions. This work has been supported in part by DFG Sonderforschungsbereich Transregio 9, Computergestützte Theoretische Teilchenphysik, by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grants P20347-N18, P22748-N18, SFB F50 (F5009-N15) and by the EU Network LHCPHENOnet PITN-GA-2010-264564.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ablinger, J., Blümlein, J. (2013). Harmonic Sums, Polylogarithms,Special Numbers, and Their Generalizations. In: Schneider, C., Blümlein, J. (eds) Computer Algebra in Quantum Field Theory. Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1616-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1616-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1615-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1616-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)