Abstract
Rotator cuff disease is frequently tied to tissue degeneration. In some cases, it is not possible to reduce symptoms and regain function without surgical treatment. The main goals of surgical procedures for rotator cuff repair (RCR) are to restore function and reduce pain. The great question regarding rehabilitation refers to the ideal moment to start rehabilitation that should initiate and develop the ROM (range of motion) gain and muscular strengthening of the cuff rotator, without disturbing the healing process. There is no consensus on timing to return to play. Decision-making involves several factors, from the type and extent of the injury, the type of surgery, and the rehabilitation process performed. Brazilian surgeons usually agree that the return to sports should be done after 6 months of surgery. These guidelines serve as a basis for conducting physiotherapy, but the individual characteristics of each patient should be respected, and the program should be personalized.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Rotator cuff disease is frequently tied to tissue degeneration related to advancing age, with a higher prevalence in individuals between 40 and 60 years [1].
The cause of rotator cuff tear is usually degenerative in elderly subjects and traumatic in younger patients [2]. Athletes are especially at risk, in particular those who practice overhead or forced overhead sports (tennis, golf, baseball, basketball) and contact sports (rugby, American football, ice hockey) [3].
When lesions are symptomatic, conservative treatment is typically recommended. In some cases, it is not possible to reduce symptoms and regain function without surgical treatment. The main goals of surgical procedures for rotator cuff repair (RCR) are to restore function and reduce pain.
The healing process of collagen tissues usually occurs between 1 and 60 days after injury, with final fiber maturation occurring up to 360 days. The initial phase is inflammation (1–3 days postoperatively), followed by proliferative or tissue repair phase (3–20 days). Fibroblasts initiate collagen synthesis in the repaired tissue, and this healing tissue begins to strengthen the sutured site. The healing tissue is remodeled through gentle stress. In the first 3 weeks after surgery, the suture performed can only withstand minimal stress due to the weakness of the healing tissue. The rehabilitation program in this initial stage of healing should be focused on pain relief, minimize inflammation, increase scapular control, and prevent postoperative complications. Between 21 and 60 days, the healing tissue becomes progressively stronger and more responsive to remodeling. Therefore, moderate stress should be applied to the joint. Peak remodeling should occur between 1 and 8 weeks [4, 5].
Physiotherapy after RCR plays a fundamental role, as it facilitates the recovery of strength and function. The great question regarding rehabilitation refers to the ideal moment to start rehabilitation that should initiate and develop the ROM (range of motion) gain and muscular strengthening of the cuff rotator, without disturbing the healing process. Re-tearing and stiffness are troubling complications and may be related to when the ROM gain begins [6,7,8,9,10]. The current literature suggests that early movement improves ROM after RCR but with a higher risk of re-tearing the rotator cuff [10, 11].
Patients with calcific tendonitis, adhesive capsulitis, partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA)-type repair, concomitant labral repair, and single-tendon RCR are at the greatest risk for stiffness development [6].
Parsons et al. evaluated 43 patients in these conditions and hypothesized that a later start to rehabilitation after RCR can contribute to stiffness of the shoulder. The sling was used for 6 weeks, and passive ROM exercises were performed between 6 and 12 weeks and active ROM exercises after 12 weeks. Patients who presented <100° of flexion and <30° of external rotation up to 8 weeks postoperative (PO) were considered at risk of stiffness (23% of total). However, after 1 year of surgery, there were no differences in ROM between the stiff and nonstiff groups. The authors believed that slowing ROM gain in the first few weeks after the operation does not encourage stiffness, even in those who exhibit some initial ROM resistance [12].
Restoring motion, strength, and function requires a proper rehabilitation program to maintain the integrity of the rotator cuff. A very slow physiotherapy program tends to promote stiffness, but an overly aggressive approach can result in recurrent rupture [13].
We believe that the best indicator for the initiation of ROM gain and strengthening of RCR is related partly to the size of the lesion, the tissue healing time, and mainly the stability of the tendons after surgery. The conditions of preexisting tissue and the stability reached after surgical repair are the main factors that guide physiotherapy. Lesions can eventually grow large, but when they reach satisfactory stability in surgery, early mobility can be achieved.
Some informations, which a physiotherapist should know before starting rehabilitation, can help during the onset and progression of physical therapy. One of the factors that guides the immobilization time is the surgical approach; in some cases, the sling is needed for a greater length of time, resulting in cicatrization of the subscapular tendon or the deltoid muscle (in open surgeries). Other examples include the size of the tears, fixation method utilized (more or less stable), location of the lesion (whether each tendinous region involved in the repair allows certain movements, as in the case of subscapular repair that requires caution in the gain of external rotation), the timing of surgery (related to the risk of joint stiffness), surrounding tissue quality (which will guide the volume and intensity of the exercises), and individual characteristics (age, health habits, lifestyle, activity level, type of professional activity, and type of recreational and/or sports activity because exercises should be customized to the personal function and activities of each patient) [14].
With this information in hand, the physiotherapist can start the treatment without risk of re-tearing. Close communication between the surgeon, the patient, and the physiotherapy team is important and should be maintained throughout the recovery process.
In Brazil, a variation of post-RCR physical therapy programs exist due to the immense size of the country, which sometimes hinders the exchange of information among professionals. Access to information and the personal experiences of surgeons and physiotherapists is not uniform in all states.
Tables 55.1 and 55.2 contain detailed information on our guidelines, which were developed based on scientific evidence, tissue healing time, and the professional experiences of surgeons and physiotherapists. Table 55.1 describes the guidelines for small and/or medium lesions with stable repair, and Table 55.2 describes guidelines for large and/or medium lesions with unstable repair.
These guidelines serve as a basis for conducting physiotherapy, but the individual characteristics of each patient should be respected, and the program should be personalized. Each phase covers patient guidance, period of initiation and progression of ROM gain, initiation of strengthening, and functional exercise activities for daily living and sports.
1 Specific Concepts of Rehabilitation
1.1 Guidance
Like other authors [15, 16] we believe patient orientation and adherence to treatment are the most important points in rehabilitation. Patients must respect the use of the sling, perform home exercises and follow the guidelines for daily activities as prescribed by the multiprofessional team.
The patient’s expectations are often unmet because he or she has not understood the information about the surgery and the postoperative plan. Poor patient satisfaction after RCR is related to persistence of pain and dysfunction, among other complaints [16]. These clarifications can easily be made before and after the procedure.
1.2 Pendulum Exercises
Pendulum exercises can be potentially dangerous after RCR if performed incorrectly. Poor performance of this exercise can cause more than 15% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Significant activation of these muscles occurs even when performed correctly [17]. Therefore, we do not recommend this exercise in our RCR guidelines.
1.3 Sling
The surgeon, who is knowledgeable of the tissue conditions during surgery and the level of stability during repair, should determine how long the patient should wear a sling. Vieira et al. asked 78 shoulder surgeon specialists in the Brazilian Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery the following question: What is the recommended time of immobilization after arthroscopic shoulder surgery? 4.3% of participants indicated early mobilization, 8.7% indicated less than 3 weeks, 67.4% indicated between 3 and 6 weeks, and 19.6% answered that the onset of mobilization depends on the lesion found. We agree that the ideal immobilization time is approximately 3 weeks for small to medium lesions with stable repairs and 4–6 weeks for large to medium lesions with unstable repairs [1].
1.4 Modalities
We used cryotherapy three to four times a day in the first 2 weeks postoperation [18] and two to three times in the subsequent period until pain decreased. The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation was used in cases of acute pain.
1.5 ROM and Strengthening
We based ROM gain on Edwards et al. study, which conducted a systematic review on the identification of which passive, active-assisted, active, and strengthening exercises required more or less involvement of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Forty-three exercises were analyzed with EMG, which determined the MVIC of each of them. Exercises with a maximum MVIC of 15% were considered low demand; MVICs between 15% and 20% were low-moderate; MVICs between 21% and 40% were moderate; MVICs between 41% and 60% were high demand; and an MVIC of 60% or higher was very high demand. The studies included in the review were conducted with healthy individuals; we should not extrapolate the results to individuals with RCR, because details such as lesion size, quality and integrity of the tendon, type of surgery, repaired tissue conditions, stability achieved in repair, age, and health habits directly interfere with tendon resistance to muscle contractions [8]. However, we have not identified studies evaluating rotator cuff MVIC in RCR subjects. We believe that studies of this nature can serve as a guide in the establishment of these standards. Figures 55.1, 55.2, and 55.3 illustrate MVIC exercises below 15% and above 50% for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapular muscles, respectively.
We orient the recovery of ROM in the abduction position with extension and especially with internal rotation (Fig. 55.4), after 10–12 weeks of PO, because this position causes a significant increase in tension in the rotator cuff [9, 19].
1.6 Activation and Strengthening of the Scapular Muscles
The rotator cuff functions to promote co-contraction, to lower the humeral head, and to promote shoulder movements. These movements cannot occur if the scapula does not maintain the axis of rotation in the glenohumeral, allowing for optimal performance of the rotator cuff. When the scapula does not perform the support role for the movements of the humerus, the result is a condition defined as scapular dyskinesis [20]. In the presence of dyskinesis, the combination of anterior tilt, internal rotation, and upward rotation of the scapula is common during arm elevation, as opposed to the expected movement of posterior tilt, external rotation, and upward rotation [21]. The three-dimensional scapular movement is necessary to maintain the subacromial space throughout the movements.
Dyskinesis is a common condition observed in individuals with or without injury [22,23,24]. In postoperative situations, the shoulder is expected to present scapular activation deficits; these should be minimized until the treatment is completed. In our experience, even after 6 months of physical therapy, scapular dyskinesis is common even in patients who have performed well in the exercises. We argue that these individuals may have had some altered scapular patterns for chronic lesions or individual biomechanics, prior to the procedure.
Scapular performance is predictive of rotator cuff activity at various shoulder positions. For this reason, scapular training is considered one of the pillars of shoulder rehabilitation.
Activating the scapular muscles requires multiplane exercises, following an ascending order of difficulty and performance. Once the patient performs an exercise satisfactorily, the difficulty of training can progress. Strengthening the rotator cuff muscles requires good posture of the body and, consequently, of the scapula. This demonstrates that muscle groups are trained together rather than in isolation, even though some of them may be activated more easily in certain positions.
The important muscles that should be focused on are the anterior serratus and lower and medium trapezium to prevent the scapular dyskinesis (Figs. 55.5 and 55.6). The power of these muscles and superior trapezium keeps the correct scapulohumeral rhythm [25,26,27,28].
2 Sensory-Motor Training, Advanced Strength, and Return to Activity
After surgical intervention, the functional rehabilitation program is vital for the return of normal shoulder function. Regaining a joint’s sense of position and neuromuscular control requires training. Functional rehabilitation is believed to increase sensitivity and facilitate the coactivation of the afferent responses of the capsuloligamentous and musculotendinous receptors, and reactive muscular contractions [29]. Functional exercises include open kinetic chain (OKC) and closed kinetic chain (CKC), allowing the reproduction of movements and postures from daily life as well as sports activities.
The final phase of rehabilitation consists of overhead strengthening, progressing endurance, advanced closed chain, proprioceptive, and plyometric exercises. Based on the functional status and strength achieved at this point postoperatively, patients may or may not be appropriate for this phase of rehabilitation. The physical therapist should focus on specific functional requirements based on strength deficits [30].
OKC exercises with ball-throwing movements are included, in addition to CKC exercises that simulate falls and movements on the ground. In both cases, the CORE activation is needed to maintain the correct muscular activation sequence and transfer and dissipate energy in the kinetic chain [31, 32].
The diagonal exercises are used to strengthen the muscles (Fig. 55.7). The diagonal D1 in the flexor pattern (acceleration) and extension (deceleration) activates the rotator cuff, scapular waist, and deltoid muscles, which is important to improve the coactivation of the intra-articular power couples [33, 34].
The sensory-motor training is an important part of the program. The lack of shoulder stability increases the need of the sensory-motor system for neuromuscular control. The feed forward and feedback mechanisms are considered as critical points of the kinetic chain, making their training extremely important for the prevention of lesions [35].
Plyometric training is also included, which facilitates the increase of excitability of the neural system and the reactive capacity of the neuromuscular system of healthy athletes shoulders (Figs. 55.8 and 55.9). This training includes the eccentric movement that produces elastic energy and transforms this accumulated energy into kinetic energy, which is transferred to the concentric phase using the shortening-strengthening cycle [36,37,38].
The return to the sport should be done gradually. The Advanced Throwers Ten Exercise Program [39] can be included. This program consists of exercises that restore muscle balance and symmetry in the overhead-throwing athlete, which is necessary for the symptom-free return to sports after lesion. Specific exercises for the sport of each patient can be used [40], as in the figures. The Brazilian shoulder surgeons agreed in relation to the time taken to return to sports (>6 months) [1].
3 Criteria to Return to Sports
Clinical decision-making for determining the successful completion of a rehabilitation program and thus safe return to activity can be challenging. There is no consensus on treatment or timing to return to play. Is a general practice, concurrent with most studies, athletes are allowed to return to play when they can demonstrate symmetric range of motion and strength and perform sport-specific exercises without pain and limitations.
Measures of strength, mobility, resistance, or pain do not necessarily translate into the patient’s ability to perform a specific movement, such as the sporting gesture. However, these measures are used to as criteria of return to sport.
Clinicians have some instruments to assist them in making discharge and return to activity decisions, with most clinicians opting to use some variation of a strength measure as a means of determining cessation of treatment or activity readiness [41]. The strength test identifies possible deficiencies and assesses safe progress in rehabilitation.
Routinely, the manual muscle testing is applied during the rehabilitation to identify strength deficits and strength imbalances. In conditions where neurological integrity is compromised, manual muscle testing may have clinical value. However, manual muscle testing may not have robust value as an individual evaluation tool for musculoskeletal injury with an absence of nerve injury or neurological dysfunction [41].
Isokinetic evaluation of IR and ER strength can help determine a functional-strength profile in patients suffering from shoulder disorders to guide diagnosis, therapy, and rehabilitation [42].
Due to the absence of a gold standard of assessment for upper extremity physical performance [41], clinicians will often utilize some variation of strength testing because force is a basic component for the execution of fundamental physical tasks. Furthermore, strength testing is for identifying potential impairments and assessing progress in the secure rehabilitation setting; it has been recognized that single-component physiological measurements of strength, mobility, endurance, or pain do not necessarily translate to a patient’s ability to perform a highly skilled dynamics task [43].
Evaluation tests of the upper limb are used in clinical and sports practices to provide important information about functional performance. Specifically, dynamic tests, whether in an OKC (pull-up, throwing test, and shot putting) or CKC (one-arm hop test, upper quarter Y-balance test, and the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test), enable not only the identification of possible deficits in strength and muscular power but also to evaluate proprioception and motor control [44,45,46,47].
These instruments have a low cost of application; are portable, easy, and quick to administer; and provide an immediate result which contributes to the use in clinical practice. However, the clinical measurement properties of these tests should be better evaluated for individuals with rotator cuff lesions.
4 Considerations
One of the main expectations of athletes, whatever their age or level of play, is to return to sports after treatment, if possible at the same level as before injury. This is especially true of professional and competitive athletes [48].
In their systematic literature review, Plate et al. [3] found 83.3% of the patients returning to competitive sports with a mean of 8.6 months after the intervention out of 124 recreational athletes (sports using the upper limb above the head) who underwent arthroscopic debridement or either arthroscopic or open cuff repair.
Klouche et al. [48] in their meta-analysis included 25 studies, with 859 patients (683 athletes) all treated surgically (arthroscopic debridements, arthroscopic repairs, repairs by minimally invasive approach, and open surgery). Although their results do not differentiate the type of treatment performed, it showed that the overall rate of return to sports was 84.7% with 65.9% of participants returning to play at the same level after between 4 and 17 months. However, if considering only professional and competitive athletes, the returned to play at the same level as before their injury was 49.9%.
Vives et al. [49] found 89.7% of patients who underwent open acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic acromioplasty and mini-open repair returning to nonprofessional golf at the same level as their pre-lesion level, but with a weekly intensity significantly reduced.
Sonnery-Cottet et al. [50] evaluated 51 amateur tennis players with rotator cuff repair (open repair and arthroscopic debridement), found 78.4% of the patients returning to sport at a mean 9.8 months after surgery at an identical or better level at the last follow-up in 77.5% of the cases, and not found difference in the ability to return to tennis between types of surgery.
Studies evaluated patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair who participating in a recreational sport soliciting the shoulder showed better results. Antoni et al. [51] found 88.6% of the returned to the same sport: 91.7% of the golfers, 88.9% of the tennis players, and 76.9% of the swimmers. Liem et al. [52] found better results in their study when they evaluated recreational athletes who undergone arthroscopic repair with 100% of the patients returning to sports at a weekly frequency and duration identical to their preoperative activity.
Bathia et al. [53] assessed a series of 31 recreational sports patients over 70 years of age operated for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and they noted that 77% of these patients returned to their sport at the same level. However, older individuals have characteristics that can make rotator cuff repair more challenging and contribute to the worst outcomes after surgery: higher prevalence to massive rotator cuff tears compared with younger patients [54], decreased bone quality, lamellar dissection, and fatty infiltration are more common [55], and healing may be impaired by poor blood supply, as histologic examination of rotator cuff tendon tissue has shown decreased vascularity in older patients [56].
There is a contrast between the recreational and the professional athlete in the literature regarding treatment of complete rotator cuff tears. Return to sports has been far more difficult for professional overhead-throwing athletes. High-level athletes who experience rotator cuff tear have a dramatically inferior prognosis for returning to sports compared with recreational athletes.
This is an important information because it shows that a professional player cannot rely on surgical repair of the rotator cuff to return him to a sports career at the same level. Although many patients do not return to play at the same level, the results of the studies in terms of pain relief or range of motion are almost all very good [48].
One of the hypotheses to explain this is that psychological factors, such as fear of another injury or loss of confidence in the shoulder, are usually not evaluated even though they may influence the return to sports [48].
Analyzing failures of the rotator cuff repairs, studies have suggested risk factors for a poor functional outcome: degenerative origin [57], work-related injuries [58], full-thickness tears [49, 58,59,60], associated labral injuries [57, 61, 62], and late surgery [63]. According to the literature, the risk factors of returning to sports at a lower level of play are professional athletic status [60, 63] and a delayed return [50].
According to a systematic review published by Ejnisman et al. [64], no studies with a high level of evidence have demonstrated what the best approach should be, in dealing with rotator cuff injuries.
Several limitations can be observed in the studies related of the return to sport. The first is the low level of evidence of the studies. We were unable to look for risk factors of not returning to sports, because most of the authors proposed a hypothesis [48]. Most of the studies do not mention the postoperative treatment performed or cite poorly. There is little information about how the return to the sport was made and what criteria were used.
5 Conclusion
Our objective was to provide guidelines and instructions for rehabilitation teams to administer efficient treatments after RCR. These guidelines are not intended to replace decision-making with regard to clinical treatment or the progression of a patient’s postoperative course. The rehabilitation program must be adapted to the particulars of the case and the reality of the service. We base our protocol on tissue healing time, surrounding tissue quality conditions, and repair stability at the same time that movement, strength, and function are reestablished.
The return to sports in the postoperative of the rotator cuff is still a challenge for clinicians. Decision-making involves several factors, from the type and extent of the injury, the type of surgery, and the rehabilitation process performed.
References
Vieira FA, Olawa PJ, Belangero PS, Arliani GG, Figueiredo EA, Ejnisman B. Rotator cuff injuries: current perspectives and trends for treatment and rehabilitation. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015;50(6):647–51.. eCollection.
Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, et al. An evidenced-based examination of the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(2):366–76.
Plate JF, Haubruck P, Walters J, et al. Rotator cuff injuries in professional and recreational athletes. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2013;22(2):134–42.
Galloway MT, Lalley AL, Shearn JT. The role of mechanical loading in tendon development, maintenance, injury, and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(17):1620–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01004.. Review.
Wang JH. Mechanobiology of tendon. J Biomech. 2006;39(9):1563–82.. Review.
Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, Vadala AP, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS. Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2009;8(25):880–90.
Yi A, Villacis D, Yalamanchili VR, Hatch GF. Comparison of rehabilitation methods after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015;4:326–34.
Edwards PK, Ebert JR, Littlewood C, Ackland T, FRACS AW. A systematic review of EMG studies in normal shoulders to inform postoperative rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;14:1–42.
Haering D, Blache Y, Raison M, Begon M. Mechanical risk of rotator cuff repair failure during passive movements: a simulation-based study. Clin Biomech. 2015;30:1–8.
Houck DA, Kraeutler MJ, Schuette HB, McCarty EC, Bravman JT. Early versus delayed motion after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:1–5.
Kluczynski MA, Isenburg MM, Marzo JM, Bisson LJ. Does early versus delayed active range of motion affect rotator cuff healing after surgical repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(3):785–91.
Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:1034–9.
Koo SS, Burkhart SS. Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29:203–11.
Ghodadra NS, Provencher M, Verma NN, Wilk KE, Romeo AA. Open, mini-open, and all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: indications and implications for rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):81–9.
Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, Leggin BG, Williams GR, Wilcox RB III. The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists’ consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:521–35.
Cole BJ, Cotter EJ, Wang KC, Davey A. Patient understanding, expectations, and satisfaction regarding rotator cuff injuries and surgical management. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:1603–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.004.
Long JL, Ruberte Thiele RA, Skendzel JG, et al. Activation of the shoulder musculature during pendulum exercises and light activities. J Orthop Sports Pys Ther. 2010;40:230–7.
Osbahr DC, Cawley PW, Speer KP. The effect of continuous cryotherapy on glenohumeral joint and subacromial space temperatures in the postoperative shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:748–54.
Takayuki M, Mitsuhiro A, Ei-ichi U, Gen M, Shigenori M. The effect of arm position on stretching of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and posterior portion of deltoid muscles: a cadaveric study. Clin Biomech. 2006;21:474–80.
Kibler WB, McMullen J. Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:142–51.
Ludewig P, Cook T. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 2000;80(3):276–91.
Myers JB, Laudner KG, Pasquale MR, Bradley JP, Lephart SM. Scapular position and orientation in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(2):263–71.
Mell AG, LaScalza S, Guffey P, Ray J, Maciejewski M, Carpenter JE, Hughes RE, Arbor N. Effect of rotator cuff pathology on shoulder rhythm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1S):59S–64S.
Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, Declercq GA, Danneels LA, Cambier DC. Symptoms scapular muscle recruitment patterns: trapezius muscle latency with and without impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2003;4(31):542–9.
Reinold MM, Escamilla RF, Wilk KE. Current concepts in the scientific and clinical rationale behind exercises for glenohumeral and scapulothoracic musculature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):105–17.
Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the ‘scapular summit’. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(14):877–85.
Cools AM, Dewitte V, Lanszweert F, et al. Rehabilitation of scapular muscle balance: which exercises to prescribe? Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1744–51.
Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology. part 3: the SICK Scapula, scapula dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(6):641–61.
Myers JB, Lephart SM. The role of the sensorimotor system in the athletic shoulder. J Athl Train. 2000;35(3):351–63.
Pogorzelski J, DelVecchio BM, Hussain ZB, Fritz EM, Godin JA, Millett PJ. Superior capsule reconstruction for massive rotator cuff tears – key considerations for rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(3):390–401.
Sciascia A, Kuschinsky N, Nitz AJ, Mair SD, Uhl TL. Electromyographical comparison of four common shoulder exercises in unstable and stable shoulders. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:783824.
Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189–98.
Escalamilla RF, Barrentine SW, Fleisig GS, et al. Pitching biomechanics as a pitcher approaches muscular fatigue during a simulated baseball game. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(1):23–33.
Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology. Part 1: pathoanatomy and biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(4):404–20.
Tripp BL, Yochem EM, Uhl TL. Recovery of upper extremity sensorimotor system activity in baseball athletes after a throwing – fatigue protocol. J Athl Train. 2007;42(4):452–7.
Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, De Clercq GA, et al. Scapular muscle recruitment pattern: electromyographic response of the trapezius muscle to sudden shoulder movement before and after a fatiguing exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(5):221–9.
Gaunt BW, McCluskey GM, Uhl TL. An eletromyographic evaluation of subdividing active-assistive shoulder elevation exercise. Sports Health. 2010;2(5):424–32.
Chmielewski TL, Myer GD, Kauffman D, Tillman SM. Plyometric exercise in the rehabilitation of athletes: physiological responses and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):308–19.
Wilk KE, Yenchak AJ, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. The advanced throwers ten exercise program: a new exercise series for enhanced dynamic shoulder control in the overhead throwing athlete. Phys Sports Med. 2011;39(4):90–7.
Ejnisman B, Barbosa G, Andreoli CV, de Castro Pochini A, Lobo T, Zogaib R, Cohen M, Bizzini M, Dvorak J. Shoulder injuries in soccer goalkeepers: review and development of a FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention program. Open Access J Sports Med. 2016;75-80(2016):7.
Sciascia A, Uhl T. Reliability of strength and performance testing measures and their ability to differentiate persons with and without shoulder symptoms. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(5):655–66.
Edouard P, Samozino P, Julia M, Gleizes Cervera S, Vanbiervliet W, Calmels P, Gremeaux V. Reliability of isokinetic assessment of shoulder-rotator strength: a systematic review of the effect of position. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(3):367–83.
Michener LA. Patient- and clinician-rated outcome measures for clinical decision making in rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil. 2011;20(1):37–45.
de Oliveira VM, Pitangui AC, Nascimento VY, da Silva HA, Dos Passos MH, de Araújo RC. Test-retest reliability of the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST) in adolescents: reliability of Ckcuest in adolescents. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(1):125–32.
Tucci HT, Martins J, Sposito GC, Camarini PM, Oliveira AS. Closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUES test): a reliability study in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1–9.
Falsone SA, Gross MT, Guskiewicz KM, Schneider RA. One-arm hop test: reliability and effects of arm dominance. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2002;32(3):98–103.
Negrete RJ, Hanney WJ, Kolber MJ, Davies GJ, Riemann B. Can upper extremity functional tests predict the softball throw for distance: a predictive validity investigation. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6(2):104–11.
Klouche S, Lefevre N, Herman S, Gerometta A, Bohu Y. Return to sport after rotator cuff tear repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(7):1877–87.
Vives MJ, Miller LS, Rubenstein DL, Taliwal RV, Becker CE. Repair of rotator cuff tears in golfers. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:165–72.
Sonnery-Cottet B, Edwards TB, Noel E, Walch G. Rotator cuff tears in middle-aged tennis players: results of surgical treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:558–64.
Antoni M, Klouche S, Mas V, Ferrand M, Bauer T, Hardy P. Return to recreational sport and clinical outcomes with at least 2 years follow-up after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Sep;102(5):563–7.
Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in overhead-throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1317–22.
Bhatia S, Greenspoon JA, Horan MP, Warth RJ, Millett PJ. Two-year outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in recreational athletes older than 70 years. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1737–42.
Gumina S, Carbone S, Campagna V, Candela V, Sacchetti FM, Giannicola G. The impact of aging on rotator cuff tear size. Musculos kelet Surg. 2013;97(suppl 1):S69–72.
Kany J, Flurin PH, Richardi G, Hardy P. French arthroscopy society. rotator cuff tear imaging in patients over 70 years: specific MRI findings? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(suppl 8):S385–90.
Brewer BJ. Aging of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7:102–10.
Payne LZ, Altchek DW, Craig EV, Warren RF. Arthroscopic treatment of partial rotator cuff tears in young athletes: a preliminary report. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(3):299–305.
Hawkins RJ, Morin WD, Bonutti PM. Surgical treatment of full- thickness rotator cuff tears in patients 40 years of age or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(3):259–65.
Bigiliani LU, Kimmel J, McCann PD, Wolfe I. Repair of rotator cuff tears in tennis players. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(2):112–7.
Mazoue CG, Andrews JR. Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(2):182–9.
Franceschi F, Papalia R, Del Buono A, et al. Articular-sided rotator cuff tears: which is the best repair? A three-year prospective randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2013;37(8):1487–93.
Van Kleunen JP, Tucker SA, Field LD, Savoie FH III. Return to high- level throwing after combination infraspinatus repair, SLAP repair, and release of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(11):2536–41.
Lin YP, Huang TF, Hung SC, Ma HL, Liu CL. Rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 50 years of age. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78(5):592–6.
Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Soares BG, Fallopa F, Peccin MS, Abdalla RJ, et al. Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD002758.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 ISAKOS
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, C., Leme, L., Barbosa, G., Ejnisman, B. (2019). Postoperative Rehabilitation: Return to Sport in the Noncompetitive Athlete. In: Imhoff, A.B., Savoie, F.H. (eds) Rotator Cuff Across the Life Span. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58729-4_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58729-4_55
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58728-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58729-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)