Abstract
It is estimated that 1.6–3.8 million sports-related concussions occur annually in the United States. In professional American football, approximately 100–200 concussions occur each year during the regular season. A concussion is defined as a “complex pathophysiological process affecting the brain, induced by traumatic biomechanical forces.” To improve in the diagnosis and subsequent management of concussion in athletes in the National Football League (NFL), the NFL’s Head, Neck, and Spine Committee has developed standardized evidenced-based protocols. In addition, the NFL has implemented new rule changes directed at reducing the incidence of concussion, improving identification of concussion, and developing a safe return to play (RTP) procedure for concussed players. The NFL concussion guidelines outline requirements for preseason baseline testing, on-field identification and diagnosis of concussion, management of concussion, and RTP criteria.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Preseason Baseline Evaluation
Prior to the start of football season , all players are required to review educational materials on concussion and undergo a preseason physical examination. Educational resources assist players in identifying signs and symptoms of concussion and emphasize the importance of removal from play after injury. Preseason physical examinations include a comprehensive interview of past medical and concussion history, neurological examination, and baseline testing [1]. The NFL has adopted a baseline assessment model for managing concussion [2], in which athletes are required to complete mental status testing and neuropsychological baseline testing when noninjured that is used as a “control” should a player sustain a concussion in the future. Baseline testing is particularly important for individuals with a history of a neurodevelopmental disorder such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [3, 4] or who have above average intelligence [5] who are not well represented by available normative data [6, 7]. The NFL does not require it, but it is often recommended that all baseline testing includes validity indicators to prevent athletes from “gaming” their baseline testing [8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18,6,7,76,71,10].
2 Sideline Assessment and Management of Concussion
Players suspected of sustaining a concussion on field must adhere to a strict concussion management protocol outlined by the NFL’s Head, Neck, and Spine Committee. The NFL’s sideline concussion protocol focuses on (1) detection of the injury and (2) evaluation of the player for concussion or other neurological pathologies [1]. Players suspected of a concussion are immediately removed from play for further evaluation to ensure the safety of the athlete [11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14].
2.1 Detection of Concussion
Identification of on-field concussion is executed by the team medical staff, coaches, teammates, and/or player. Given the tendency for athletes to underreport their symptoms of concussion or for a general lack of player awareness [15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18], the NFL has implemented an organized team of medical personnel to watch closely for concussions during games. Personnel required include the team physician, club athletic trainer, booth athletic trainers (also known as the “eyes in the sky”), and an unaffiliated neurotrauma consultant (UNC) [1]. Personnel are trained to monitor players for acute signs and symptoms of concussion, as outlined in Table 52.1, after sustaining a traumatic blow to the head or body. With increasing education around concussion, it is common for coaches and/or teammates to report a suspected concussion as well, especially if the player in question is not exhibiting obvious or outward signs/symptoms.
Fact Box 1
A loss of consciousness is not required for a diagnosis of concussion.
Contrary to popular belief, a loss of consciousness (LOC) is not required for a diagnosis of concussion [13, 19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21], and LOC or posttraumatic amnesia [22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24] at the time of injury does not always equate to a more severe concussion [22, 23, 25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18,6,7,76,71,10,46,99,87,33,34,84,27]. On-field endorsement of dizziness [25, 27] and posttraumatic migraine [28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30] may be better clinical indicators of length of recovery time from concussion. If a player is suspected of sustaining a concussion, the player is immediately removed from play and evaluated by medical personnel. There are six “Go/No-Go” criteria that require immediate removal of the NFL player from the field without chance of return. They include LOC, confusion, amnesia, new or persistent symptoms (e.g., headache, nausea, dizziness), abnormal neurological findings, and progressive or worsening symptoms [1].
It is important to remove players immediately after a potential injury to rule out critical neurological pathology and prevent from additional blows to the head while the brain is in a vulnerable state of neurometabolic crisis [19, 21] from concussion [31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18,6,7,76,71,10,46,99,87,33,34]. Football players who continue to play immediately after sustaining a concussion are at an increased risk of a prolonged recovery. In fact, a recent manuscript shows that athletes who continue to play after experiencing concussion symptoms may double their recovery time [35].
Fact Box 2
Athletes who continue to play after sustaining a concussion may double their recovery time from the injury.
2.2 Evaluation of the Player for Concussion
Once removed from play for a concussion evaluation , sideline assessment of the athlete includes an evaluation of concussion signs and symptoms, a focused neurological examination, and a modified Maddock’s questioning [1, 36] for evaluation of orientation and recent memory. Traditional orientation questions (e.g., person, place, and time) have been demonstrated to be unreliable for sideline assessment of sports concussion when compared to recent memory questioning (Table 52.2) [13, 36, 37]. If a player is suspected of having a concussion or there are abnormal findings on the sideline assessment, then the player is taken to the locker room for further evaluation.
The NFL utilizes an NFL-specific tailored version of a standardized sideline assessment tool for concussion, known as the Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool – 3rd Edition (SCAT3), for brief cognitive and mental status testing once an athlete is removed from play [1, 37, 38]. Results of testing are compared with the player’s preseason baseline testing. The player is not permitted to return to the same game or practice if suspected of a concussion and is required to enter the NFL concussion protocol for return to football participation. To return to contact football, the player must be cleared by his team physician and an independent concussion specialist in accordance with international guidelines [1, 11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13, 39, 40].
3 In-Office Evaluation of Concussion
Initiation of the NFL concussion protocol first results in the player receiving education surrounding the expected signs and symptoms of concussion. Injured players are then managed by their team medical staff and/or in-office by a licensed concussion specialist. The NFL requires concussed players to return to their baseline functioning in terms of their report of symptoms and neurological/neurocognitive exam before re-engaging in physical activity [1]. Aside from the recommendation of serial neuropsychological testing to track players’ neurocognitive recovery [1, 2] post-injury, there is little direction provided by the NFL and international concussion consensus statements regarding the in-office management and treatment of concussion to facilitate concussed players’ return to baseline functioning [11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14, 39].
Current guidelines requiring a return to baseline status are helpful for preventing a premature return to play. The recommendations vary among team physicians and athletic trainers in the NFL. The role of “active rehabilitation” from concussion is in evolution and being studied. A “one-size-fits-all” approach to concussion management is no longer embraced [41]. In the recent past, to promote recovery post-injury, most players are prescribed physical and some form of cognitive rest until asymptomatic; however, there is sparse evidence to support strict rest for managing concussion [42,43,44,45]. A randomized control study [46] demonstrated that strict rest after concussion may actually lead to a slower recovery and worsened symptoms [46,47,48,49]. A recent consensus meeting held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, among leading concussion experts, including NFL physicians and concussion consultants, on the “Targeted Evaluation and Active Management (TEAM) Approaches to Treating Concussion,” indicated that 97% of experts believed that strict rest may have detrimental effects after concussion and may not be an effective strategy for all concussions. Furthermore, 100% of these experts advocated for an individualized, active treatment approach to concussion, in which treatment was matched to the individual clinical profile of the concussed athlete [41]. To improve treatment approaches, the NFL, in collaboration with other institutions, has launched a $60 million Head Health Initiative to expedite development of better diagnostic tools, improved protective gear, and better treatment techniques for concussion [50].
3.1 Diagnostic Assessment of Concussion
To develop an individualized treatment plan for concussion, a comprehensive, multimodal diagnostic assessment is warranted in order to delineate the clinical profile of the concussed player [13, 51,52,53]. The NFL currently employs a neurological exam with mental status, neuropsychological, and balance testing for their initial assessment [1] and has recently started to implement other cutting-edge measures sensitive to concussion [50]. Traditional neurodiagnostic techniques (e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging), although helpful in ruling out intracranial bleeds and/or skull fracture, are not recommended for determining diagnosis of concussion. They are typically not sensitive to concussion and may involve potentially harmful radiation exposure [54, 55]. International guidelines recommend that the in-office assessment of concussion includes a thorough clinical interview, a subjective report of symptoms, and the use of empirically established, objective tools sensitive to concussion [13, 51]. Table 52.3 provides an overview of a multimodal approach to concussion diagnosis and evaluation utilized by concussion consultants for the Pittsburgh Steelers [13, 51, 52, 56, 57]. The multimodal assessment includes a clinical interview, symptom report, cognitive testing, and vestibular-oculomotor screening.
3.1.1 Clinical Interview
Establishing a trusting relationship with the player and team organization is important for gaining an understanding of the player and facilitating comprehensive care. Sideline evaluations conducted by the team medical staff are useful in identifying the mechanism of injury, acute signs and symptoms of concussion, and performance on mental status testing in order to gain an appreciation for the severity and nature of the injury. Detailing the personal and family medical history is important for identifying risk factors of concussion. Records from the player’s medical history collected in the preseason evaluation by the team medical staff should be utilized when possible for verification of medical history.
A thorough review of concussion risk factors is vital in order to prognosticate recovery time. Most athletes are expected to recover within 1 to 3 weeks of injury; however, 10–20% of athletes in the general population do not recover in this timeframe [23, 53, 58]. The presence of multiple prior concussions [27, 59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61] or a personal or family history of the following preinjury conditions have been identified as potential risk factors for a protracted recovery: neurodevelopmental/neurological condition [27, 62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64], psychiatric condition such as anxiety/depression [65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69], migraine [28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30], and/or sleep disturbance [70, 71]. Other suspected risk factors that have yet to be fully established include a personal or family history of oculomotor dysfunction [72, 73] or motion sensitivity such as vertigo [53, 74,11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18,6,7,76]. An understanding of these risk factors can set the stage for conceptualizing a player’s clinical profile and necessary treatment.
Psychosocial history is also pertinent to conceptualizing the functional challenges and limitations a player may experience after a concussion. Players may endorse different types of symptoms in specific environments (e.g., being in the locker room, riding a bus, and watching film) that can provide useful information about the deficits and functional impairments from the concussion. For instance, a player who experiences a headache while watching film may suggest the presence of oculomotor dysfunction due to the visual demand involved in this task. There may also be environmental stressors that can play a role in the player’s response to injury, including a lack of social support in the nearby area, external pressures to return to play quickly, and fears surrounding long-term health. The overall goal of the clinical interview is to establish concussion risk factors, address the player’s concerns, and determine specific functional limitations from the injury.
3.1.2 Symptom Report
A concussion can result in a myriad of physical, cognitive, sleep, and mood symptoms. Table 52.4 details some of the most common symptoms of concussion that are often reported on post-concussion symptom questionnaires [77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79]. The pattern of symptom reporting can provide useful information regarding the clusters of symptoms most bothersome to the player [30, 51,52,53, 73]. Athletes who report a higher total symptom score upon initial evaluation tend to take a longer time to recover from concussion [24, 80, 81]. Although evaluating symptoms is an important aspect of the assessment, objective measures should also be utilized in conjunction with self-report data given athletes’ tendency to underreport their symptoms of concussion [15, 18, 82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93,64,50,1,79,73,55,68,69,95,83,9,5,18,6,7,76,71,10,46,99,87,33,34,84].
Fact Box 3
Athletes who report a greater number of symptoms upon initial evaluation tend to take longer to recover from concussion.
3.1.3 Cognitive Testing
Neuropsychological testing has been recognized by international guidelines as a valid and reliable tool for the objective evaluation of concussion [11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14]. Neuropsychological testing can be administered one on one through paper-and-pencil tests or in a computerized format with all test instructions embedded within the computer program. Computerized neurocognitive testing is recognized as one of the most widely used assessments for concussion management [85, 86], and one tool, ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing), has recently become the first device for concussion assessment approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [87]. It is sensitive in detecting concussed from non-concussed athletes, can be serially administered to track recovery over time, and has prognostic value in estimating length of recovery time [18, 81, 84, 88]. Athletes who are reportedly asymptomatic can still demonstrate deficits on computerized neurocognitive testing [18, 84].
3.1.4 Vestibular-Oculomotor Screening
The vestibular system is a complex sensory system that allows for neural maintenance of balance/postural control and stabilization of vision during movement. When this sensory system is disturbed after a concussion, it can result in subjective complaints of dizziness, vertigo, nausea, light-headedness, unstable vision, imbalance, and motion discomfort [89,90,74,11,19,2,47,42,59,43,31,65,20,96,58,62,22,41,51,60,39,38,66,61,15,35,3,52,8,63,88,48,21,91,49,75,94,54,53,92,77,85,86,67,28,78,70,80,81,25,97,56,98,26,36,72,23,16,37,32,12,13,40,14,17,82,24,29,30,44,57,45,93]. Given that nearly 40% of athletes report balance impairment [78] and 50% endorse dizziness [80] after a concussion, a thorough evaluation of the vestibular-oculomotor system is recommended [51, 93]. Balance testing is currently utilized by the NFL to assess disturbance of the vestibulospinal tract [1, 91, 94, 95], and some teams have begun to implement screening of dynamic vestibular functions (e.g., vestibular-ocular reflex, visual motion sensitivity) that are involved in the stabilization of vision and tolerance of dynamic movement [50, 93]. Disruption of vestibular reflexes can be a contributor to players’ intolerance of exercise post-injury and is associated with increased recovery time following sport-related concussion [74, 89, 90].
Oculomotor abnormalities in which there is a deficit in the neural control of eye movements are also common following concussion. There are multiple oculomotor abnormalities that can occur after a head injury, including abnormal eye movement and function [96]. For example, a convergence insufficiency occurs when there is a reduced ability for the eyes to team toward each other upon near vision. Athletes with a sport-related concussion are 10 times more likely to demonstrate a convergence insufficiency when compared to the general population [72, 73]. Athletes with oculomotor dysfunction often report increased symptoms when engaging in visually demanding tasks such as watching film, engaging in computer work, and reading [72, 73]. Concussion consultants for the Pittsburgh Steelers have developed and validated a brief vestibular-ocular screening tool that can be used for in-office or sideline assessment of vestibular-oculomotor dysfunction; see Table 52.5 [74, 78, 93]. This Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool evaluates multiple vestibular-oculomotor functions and has athletes endorse their experience of headache, dizziness, nausea, and fogginess on a scale from 1 to 10 at rest and with each assessment. The VOMS can be serially administered to track recovery over time.
3.2 Individual Clinical Profiles and Targeted Treatment for Concussion
Multimodal assessment of concussion as outlined above facilitates conceptualization of the player’s clinical profile and trajectory from the injury . Establishment of the clinical profile allows for targeted, active rehabilitation from concussion rather than a “one-size-fits-all” approach. In the first few days of injury, athletes may demonstrate a global concussion presentation that includes primarily cognitive deficits, fatigue, and migraine symptoms [78]. It is suggested by experts that beyond the acute stage of injury, athletes begin to demonstrate a more delineated clinical profile/s from the concussion [41, 51, 52, 56].
Utilizing information gleaned from sideline assessments, clinical interview, preexisting risk factors, record review, symptom report, cognitive testing, and vestibular-oculomotor screening, a comprehensive and targeted rehabilitation program can be initiated for more active treatment and rehabilitation of concussion. Conceptualization of the clinical profile/s should incorporate a careful consideration of concussion risk factors, mechanism of injury, symptoms, functional deficits, and abnormalities on objective examination. Summarized in Table 52.6 are emerging clinical profiles from concussion. Each profile is associated with specific symptoms, objective test findings, and rehabilitation recommendations [41, 53]. Establishment of these clinical profiles is in its infancy and requires further empirical investigation which is underway by multiple institutions, including studies funded by the NFL [41, 50,51,52,53]. Once a player’s profile is determined, treatment can begin to actively rehabilitate the player for return to football.
Fact Box 4
Concussion is an individualized injury that has different clinical profiles that require targeted treatment rather than a “one-size-fits-all” approach.
3.3 Return to Play Criteria
International return to play (RTP) guidelines are standardized in order to protect athletes from returning to sport participation prematurely. A player is never returned to play on the same day as a concussion is diagnosed. In order to receive full clearance back to contact football, these guidelines require an athlete to be (1) asymptomatic at rest, (2) asymptomatic with noncontact exertion, and (3) at their neurocognitive baseline. These criteria protect and prevent athletes who still demonstrate signs and symptoms of concussion from returning to football while the brain is still recovering from injury [13]. If an athlete has not met these criteria or there is a question of criteria being met, then holding an athlete from RTP is warranted as additional head insult while the player is still concussed can have potentially deleterious outcomes [31, 32].
Fact Box 5
A player is never returned to play on the same day as a concussion is diagnosed. In order to receive full clearance back to play, international guidelines require an athlete to be (1) asymptomatic at rest, (2) asymptomatic with noncontact exertion, and (3) at their neurocognitive baseline.
The NFL’s Head, Neck, and Spine Committee’s Return to Participation Protocol [1] and International Consensus Statements [13] advocate for a graduated, stepwise return to physical exertion. The NFL exertion protocol is initiated once the player returns to their baseline status in terms of symptoms and neurological examination. Stepwise exertion protocols such as the NFL’s often require an athlete to start with low-level physical activity and (suggest but do not require) the athlete remain asymptomatic for 24 h at each stage before progressing to the next level.
This stepwise, homogenous approach for returning to physical activity can be problematic in select athletes. Firstly, as noted in the treatments for different concussion trajectories, some players can tolerate physical activity early after the injury. Participation in exercise may actually expedite some players’ recovery time, while players with different concussion trajectories may be highly symptomatic with certain types of exertion [49, 56, 89, 90, 97, 98]. The clinical profile of the athlete plays a role in their tolerance of particular physical activity (e.g., heavy aerobic activity versus dynamic movement). A “one-size-fits-all” approach is again not uniformly successful for prescribing exertion activities and treatment approaches in concussion management given the individualized nature of the injury. Secondly, preventing players from exercising after injury may have deleterious effects on their mood and physical conditioning [47, 99]. Lastly, requiring a player to follow a structured, stepwise exertion protocol when they can tolerate exercise early after injury may potentially delay their return to full health.
Once a player has successfully returned to their baseline status and completed the exertion protocol, clearance is required from multiple members of the NFL concussion management team. The player must have baseline scores returned to normal as interpreted by a team’s neuropsychological consultant, receive clearance from the team physician, and receive clearance from an independent neurological consultant with expertise in concussion. Full clearance allows the player to return to full sport participation, including competition and contact activities.
Take-Home Message
The NFL’s Head, Neck, and Spine Committee has evolved their guidelines for concussion identification and management to protect the health of players. Standardized protocols designed by the NFL for return to football participation prevent concussed players from being prematurely returned to play. Individualized clinical profiles after concussion have started to emerge and are being studied to potentially allow for targeted treatment from the injury rather than a “one-size-fits-all” approach.
Top Five Evidence Based References
Anzalone AJ, Blueitt D, Case T, McGuffin T, Pollard K, Garrison JC et al (2017) A positive vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) is associated with increased recovery time after sports-related concussion in youth and adolescent athletes. Am J Sports Med 45(2):474–479
Collins MW, Kontos AP, Okonkwo DO, Almquist J, Bailes J, Barisa M et al (2016) Statements of agreement from the targeted evaluation and active management (TEAM) approaches to treating concussion meeting held in Pittsburgh, Oct 15–16, 2015. Neurosurgery 79:912–929
Elbin R, Sufrinko A, Schatz P, French J, Henry L, Burkhart S et al (2016) Removal from play after concussion and recovery time. Pediatrics 2016:e20160910
Collins MW, Kontos AP, Reynolds E, Murawski CD, Fu FH (2014) A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):235–246
McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Bailes J, Broglio S et al (2017). Consensus statement on concussion in sport: The 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Br J Sports Med, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699
References
NFL Head Neck and Spine Committee (2014) NFL Head, Neck, and Spine Committee's protocols regarding diagnosis and management of concussion
Barth JT, Alves W, Ryan T, Macciocchi SN, Rimel RW, Nelson WE (1989) Mild head injury in sports: Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. Mild Head Injury. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 257–275
Elbin RJ, Kontos AP, Kegel N, Johnson E, Burkhart S, Schatz P (2013) Individual and combined effects of LD and ADHD on computerized neurocognitive concussion test performance: evidence for separate norms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act024
Zuckerman SL, Lee YM, Odom MJ, Solomon GS, Sills AK (2013) Baseline neurocognitive scores in athletes with attention deficit-spectrum disorders and/or learning disability. J Neurosurg Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.PEDS12524
Schatz P, Robertshaw S (2014) Comparing post-concussive neurocognitive test data to normative data presents risks for under-classifying “above average” athletes. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 29:625–632
Solomon GS, Haase RF (2008) Biopsychosocial characteristics and neurocognitive test performance in National Football League players: an initial assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 23:563–577
Solomon GS, Kuhn A (2014) Relationship between concussion history and neurocognitive test performance in national football league draft picks. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513518742
Erdal K (2012) Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: how athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27:473–479
Schatz P, Glatts C (2013) “Sandbagging” baseline test performance on ImPACT, without detection, is more difficult than it appears. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 28:236–244
Szabo AJ, Alosco ML, Fedor A, Gunstad J (2013) Invalid performance and the ImPACT in national collegiate athletic association division I football players. J Athl Train 48:851–855
Aubry M, Cantu R, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, Johnston K, Kelly J et al (2002) Summary and agreement statement of the first international conference on concussion in sport, Vienna 2001. Recommendations for the improvement of safety and health of athletes who may suffer concussive injuries. Br J Sports Med 36:6–10
McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, Aubry M, Cantu R, Dvorak J et al (2005) Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd international conference on concussion in sport, Prague 2004. Br J Sports Med 39:196–204
McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Aubry M, Cantu B, Dvorak J, Echemendia R et al (2013) Consensus statement on concussion in sport—the 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. J Sci Med Sport Sports Med Aust 16:178–189
McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Molloy M et al (2009) Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2008. Br J Sports Med 43(Suppl 1):76–90
Delaney JS, Lacroix VJ, Leclerc S, Johnston KM (2002) Concussions among university football and soccer players. Clin J Sport Med 12:331–338
McCrea M, Hammeke T, Olsen G, Leo P, Guskiewicz K (2004) Unreported concussion in high school football players: implications for prevention. Clin J Sport Med 14:13–17
Meehan WP III, Mannix RC, O'Brien MJ, Collins MW (2013) The prevalence of undiagnosed concussions in athletes. Clin J Sport Med 23:339
Schatz P, Sandel N (2012) Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512466038
Barkhoudarian G, Hovda DA, Giza CC (2011) The molecular pathophysiology of concussive brain injury. Clin Sports Med 30(33–48):vii–iii
Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2014) Concussion in sports. BrainLine, Pretoria
Giza CC, Hovda DA (2001) The neurometabolic cascade of concussion. J Athl Train 36:228–235
Collins MW, Iverson GL, Lovell MR, McKeag DB, Norwig J, Maroon J (2003) On-field predictors of neuropsychological and symptom deficit following sports-related concussion. Clin J Sport Med 13:222–229
McCrea M, Guskiewicz K, Randolph C, Barr WB, Hammeke TA, Marshall SW et al (2013) Incidence, clinical course, and predictors of prolonged recovery time following sport-related concussion in high school and college athletes. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 19:22–33
Meehan WP III, Mannix RC, Stracciolini A, Elbin RJ, Collins MW (2013) Symptom severity predicts prolonged recovery after sport-related concussion, but age and amnesia do not. J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.012
Lau BC, Kontos AP, Collins MW, Mucha A, Lovell MR (2011) Which on-field signs/symptoms predict protracted recovery from sport-related concussion among high school football players? Am J Sports Med 39:2311–2318
Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, McKeag D, Maroon JC (1999) Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion? Clin J Sport Med 9:193–198
Zemek RL, Farion KJ, Sampson M, McGahern C (2013) Prognosticators of persistent symptoms following pediatric concussion: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr 167:259–265
Kontos AP, Elbin RJ, Lau B, Simensky S, Freund B, French J et al (2013) Posttraumatic migraine as a predictor of recovery and cognitive impairment after sport-related concussion. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513488751
Mihalik JP, Register-Mihalik J, Kerr ZY, Marshall SW, McCrea MC, Guskiewicz KM (2013) Recovery of posttraumatic migraine characteristics in patients after mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513487982
Mihalik JP, Stump JE, Collins MW, Lovell MR, Field M, Maroon JC (2005) Posttraumatic migraine characteristics in athletes following sports-related concussion. J Neurosurg 102:850–855
Cantu RC, Gean AD (2010) Second-impact syndrome and a small subdural hematoma: an uncommon catastrophic result of repetitive head injury with a characteristic imaging appearance. J Neurotrauma 27:1557–1564
McCrory P, Davis G, Makdissi M (2012) Second impact syndrome or cerebral swelling after sporting head injury. Curr Sports Med Rep 11:21–23
Vagnozzi R, Signoretti S, Cristofori L, Alessandrini F, Floris R, Isgro E et al (2010) Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain J Neurol 133:3232–3242
Vagnozzi R, Tavazzi B, Signoretti S, Amorini AM, Belli A, Cimatti M et al (2007) Temporal window of metabolic brain vulnerability to concussions: mitochondrial-related impairment--part I. Neurosurgery 61:379–388
Elbin R, Sufrinko A, Schatz P, French J, Henry L, Burkhart S et al (2016) Removal from play after concussion and recovery time. Pediatrics 2016:e20160910
Maddocks DL, Dicker GD, Saling MM (1995) The assessment of orientation following concussion in athletes. Clin J Sport Med 5:32–35
McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, Kluge J, Bartolic E, Finn G et al (1998) Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC): on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma Rehabil 13:27–35
Concussion in Sport Group (2013) SCAT3: sport concussion assessment tool – 3rd edition. Br J Sports Med 47:259–262
Concussion in Sport Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. Paper presented at: consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, Oct 2016; Berlin
McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Molloy M et al (2009) Consensus statement on concussion in sport–the 3rd international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2008. S Afr J Sports Med 21:1613
Collins MW, Kontos AP, Okonkwo DO, Almquist J, Bailes J, Barisa M et al (2016) Statements of agreement from the targeted evaluation and active management (TEAM) approaches to treating concussion meeting held in Pittsburgh, Oct 15–16, 2015. Neurosurgery 79:912–929
Broglio SP, Collins MW, Williams RM, Mucha A, Kontos AP (2015) Current and emerging rehabilitation for concussion: a review of the evidence. Clin Sports Med 34:213–231
Buckley TA, Munkasy BA, Clouse BP (2016) Acute cognitive and physical rest may not improve concussion recovery time. J Head Trauma Rehabil 31:233–241
Moser RS, Glatts C, Schatz P (2012) Efficacy of immediate and delayed cognitive and physical rest for treatment of sports-related concussion. J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.012
Moser RS, Schatz P, Glenn M, Kollias KE, Iverson GL (2015) Examining prescribed rest as treatment for adolescents who are slow to recover from concussion. Brain Inj 29:58–63
Thomas DG, Apps JN, Hoffmann RG, McCrea M, Hammeke T (2015) Benefits of strict rest after acute concussion: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 135:213–223
Berlin AA, Kop WJ, Deuster PA (2006) Depressive mood symptoms and fatigue after exercise withdrawal: the potential role of decreased fitness. Psychosom Med 68:224–230
Giza CC, Griesbach GS, Hovda DA (2005) Experience-dependent behavioral plasticity is disturbed following traumatic injury to the immature brain. Behav Brain Res 157:11–22
Griesbach GS, Hovda D, Molteni R, Wu A, Gomez-Pinilla F (2004) Voluntary exercise following traumatic brain injury: brain-derived neurotrophic factor upregulation and recovery of function. Neuroscience 125:129–139
NFL Communications (2017). NFL partners with CFL on concussion testing. 2015. https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL-Partners-With-CFL-On-Concussion-Testing.aspx. Accessed 12 Jan 2017
Collins MW, Kontos AP, Reynolds E, Murawski CD, Fu FH (2014) A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:235–246
Ellis MJ, Leddy JJ, Willer B (2015) Physiological, vestibulo-ocular and cervicogenic post-concussion disorders: an evidence-based classification system with directions for treatment. Brain Inj 29:238–248
Henry LC, Elbin RJ, Collins MW, Marchetti G, Kontos AP (2016) Examining recovery trajectories after sport-related concussion with a multimodal clinical assessment approach. Neurosurgery 78:232–241
Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ, Luber S, Blaudeau E, DeBlieux PM (2000) Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 343:100–105
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505
Leddy JJ, Sandhu H, Sodhi V, Baker JG, Willer B (2012) Rehabilitation of concussion and post-concussion syndrome. Sports health 4:147–154
Moser RS, Iverson GL, Echemendia RJ, Lovell MR, Schatz P, Webbe FM et al (2007) Neuropsychological evaluation in the diagnosis and management of sports-related concussion. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 22:909–916
Collins M, Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Ide T, Maroon J (2006) Examining concussion rates and return to play in high school football players wearing newer helmet technology: a three-year prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 58:275–286
Bruce JM, Echemendia RJ (2004) Concussion history predicts self-reported symptoms before and following a concussive event. Neurology 63:1516–1518
Colvin AC, Mullen J, Lovell MR, West RV, Collins MW, Groh M (2009) The role of concussion history and gender in recovery from soccer-related concussion. Am J Sports Med 37:1699–1704
Covassin T, Moran R, Wilhelm K (2013) Concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance of high school and college athletes who incur multiple concussions. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513499230
Collins MW, Grindel SH, Lovell MR, Dede DE, Moser DJ, Phalin BR et al (1999) Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. JAMA 282:964–970
Fay TB, Yeates KO, Taylor HG, Bangert B, Dietrich A, Nuss KE et al (2010) Cognitive reserve as a moderator of postconcussive symptoms in children with complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:94–105
Nelson LD, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Hammeke T, Barr W, Randolph C et al (2016) Multiple self-reported concussions are more prevalent in athletes with ADHD and learning disability. Clin J Sport Med 26:120–127
Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, Borg J, von Holst H, Holm L et al (2004) Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Medicine 43(Suppl):84–105
Covassin T, Crutcher B, Bleecker A, Heiden EO, Dailey A, Yang J (2014) Postinjury anxiety and social support among collegiate athletes: a comparison between orthopaedic injuries and concussions. J Athl Train 49:462
Kontos AP, Covassin T, Elbin RJ, Parker T (2012) Depression and neurocognitive performance after concussion among male and female high school and collegiate athletes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:1751–1756
Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A (2011) Long-term outcomes after uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison with trauma controls. J Neurotrauma 28:937–946
Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A, Schonberger M (2012) Predictors of postconcussive symptoms 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 26:304–313
Kostyun RO, Milewski MD, Hafeez I (2014) Sleep disturbance and neurocognitive function during the recovery from a sport-related concussion in adolescents. Am J Sports Med. 0363546514560727
Sufrinko A, Johnson EW, Henry LC (2016) The influence of sleep duration and sleep-related symptoms on baseline neurocognitive performance among male and female high school athletes. Neuropsychology 30:484
Master CL, Scheiman M, Gallaway M, Goodman A, Robinson RL, Master SR et al (2016) Vision diagnoses are common after concussion in adolescents. Clin Pediatr 55:260–267
Pearce KL, Sufrinko A, Lau BC, Henry L, Collins MW, Kontos AP (2015) Near point of convergence after a sport-related concussion: measurement reliability and relationship to neurocognitive impairment and symptoms. Am J Sports Med 43:3055–3061
Anzalone AJ, Blueitt D, Case T, McGuffin T, Pollard K, Garrison JC et al (2016) A positive vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) is associated with increased recovery time after sports-related concussion in youth and adolescent athletes. Am J Sports Med 0363546516668624:[pii]
Gurley JM, Hujsak BD, Kelly JL (2013) Vestibular rehabilitation following mild traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 32:519–528
Sosnoff JJ, Broglio SP, Shin S, Ferrara MS (2011) Previous mild traumatic brain injury and postural-control dynamics. J Athl Train 46:85–91
King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NEG, Wade DT (1995) The rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 242:587–592
Kontos AP, Elbin RJ, Schatz P, Covassin T, Henry L, Pardini J et al (2012) A revised factor structure for the post-concussion symptom scale: baseline and postconcussion factors. Am J Sports Med 40:2375–2384
Pardini D, Stump JE, Lovell M, Collins MW, Moritz K, Fu FH (2004) The post-concussion symptoms scale (PCSS): A factor analysis. Br J Sports Med 38:661
Lau B, Lovell MR, Collins MW, Pardini J (2009) Neurocognitive and symptom predictors of recovery in high school athletes. Clin J Sport Med 19:216–221
Lau BC, Collins MW, Lovell MR (2012) Cutoff scores in neurocognitive testing and symptom clusters that predict protracted recovery from concussions in high school athletes. Neurosurgery 70:371–379; discussion 379
Meehan WP III, Mannix RC, O'Brien MJ, Collins MW (2013) The prevalence of undiagnosed concussions in athletes. Clin J Sport Med. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e318291d3b3
Sandel NK, Lovell MR, Kegel NE, Collins MW, Kontos AP (2012) The relationship of symptoms and neurocognitive performance to perceived recovery from sports-related concussion among adolescent athletes. Appl Neuropsychol. 10.1080/21622965.2012.670580; M3: doi:10.1080/21622965.2012.670580; 02 10.1080/21622965.2012.6705801-6
Van Kampen DA, Lovell MR, Pardini JE, Collins MW, Fu FH (2006) The “value added” of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion. Am J Sports Med 34:1630–1635
Kinnaman KA, Mannix RC, Comstock RD, Meehan WP (2013) Management strategies and medication use for treating pediatric patients with concussions. Acta Paediatr (Oslo 1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12315
Kinnaman KA, Mannix RC, Comstock RD, Meehan WP III (2014) Management of pediatric patients with concussion by emergency medicine physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care 30:458–461
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2016) FDA allows marketing of first-of-kind computerized cognitive tests to help assess cognitive skills after a head injury. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm517526.htm
Fazio VC, Lovell MR, Pardini JE, Collins MW (2007) The relation between post concussion symptoms and neurocognitive performance in concussed athletes. NeuroRehabilitation 22:207–216
Alsalaheen BA, Mucha A, Morris LO, Whitney SL, Furman JM, Camiolo-Reddy CE et al (2010) Vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness and balance disorders after concussion. J Neurol Phys Ther 34:87–93
Alsalaheen BA, Whitney SL, Mucha A, Morris LO, Furman JM, Sparto PJ (2013) Exercise prescription patterns in patients treated with vestibular rehabilitation after concussion. Physiother Res Int 18:100–108
Goldberg JM (2012) The vestibular system: a sixth sense. OUP USA, New York, NY
Hoffer ME, Gottshall KR, Moore R, Balough BJ, Wester D (2004) Characterizing and treating dizziness after mild head trauma. Otol Neurotol 25:135–138
Mucha A, Collins MW, Elbin RJ, Furman JM, Troutman-Enseki C, DeWolf RM et al (2014) A brief vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) assessment to evaluate concussions: preliminary findings. Am J Sports Med 42:2479–2486
Guskiewicz KM (2001) Postural stability assessment following concussion: one piece of the puzzle. Clin J Sport Med 11:182–189
Riemann BL, Guskiewicz KM (2000) Effects of mild head injury on postural stability as measured through clinical balance testing. J Athl Train 35:19–25
Ciuffreda KJ, Kapoor N, Rutner D, Suchoff IB, Han ME, Craig S (2007) Occurrence of oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis. Optometry 78:155–161
Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Donnelly JP, Pendergast DR, Epstein LH, Willer B (2010) A preliminary study of subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 20:21–27
Leddy JJ, Willer B (2013) Use of graded exercise testing in concussion and return-to-activity management. Curr Sports Med Rep 12:370–376
Thomas DG, Apps JN, Hoffmann RG, McCrea M, Hammeke T (2015) Benefits of strict rest after acute concussion: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. peds.2014-0966 [pii]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 ESSKA
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collins, M.W., Sandel, N., Norwig, J.A., Ruef, S. (2018). Sport-related Concussion: Experience from the National Football League. In: Musahl, V., Karlsson, J., Krutsch, W., Mandelbaum, B., Espregueira-Mendes, J., d'Hooghe, P. (eds) Return to Play in Football. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55713-6_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55713-6_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55712-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55713-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)