Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Roboter in der Pflege

Welche Aufgaben können Roboter heute schon übernehmen?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soziale Roboter

  • 11k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Einsatz von sozialen Robotern in der Pflege ist ein Lösungsansatz für den herrschenden Mangel an Pflegekräften. Dadurch kann nicht nur das Personal in Einrichtungen entlastet werden, sondern die unterstützungsbedürftigen Personen können länger zu Hause wohnen. Doch dieser Einsatz ist mit Ängsten und ethischen Bedenken verbunden. An Lio, einem Roboter der Firma F&P Robotics AG, und verschiedenen internationalen Beispielen wird in diesem Beitrag aufgezeigt, was bis heute entwickelt wurde, wie die Roboter heute schon im Alltag helfen und wie die EntwicklerInnen den Ängsten und ethischen Herausforderungen begegnen. Lio wird dabei genauer beschrieben und an seinem Beispiel gezeigt, wie das Verhalten und Design eines Roboters an die Pflegeumgebung angepasst werden können.

Designed to assist care personnel and improve people’s quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • aibo’s Tricks. (o. D.) aibo. https://us.aibo.com/contents/. Zugegriffen am 05.04.2021

  • Aido User Manual. (o. D.) aido. https://indd.adobe.com/view/ae2b8915-9e07-4d56-9364-bbbaae9a1f8c. Zugegriffen am 05.04.2021

  • Alonso SG, Hamrioui S, de la Torre Díez I, Motta Cruz E, López-Coronado M, Franco M (2019) Social robots for people with aging and dementia: a systematic review of literature. Telemed J E Health 25(7):533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade AO, Pereira AA, Walter S, Almeida R, Loureiro R, Copagna D, Kyberd PJ (2014) Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care. Biomed Signal Pro Control 10:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA (2008) Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J Am Med Dir Assoc 9:173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendel O (2018) Roboter im Gesundheitsbereich. In: Bendel O (Hrsg) Pflegeroboter. Springer Gabler, Berlin, S 195–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bendel O (2020) Der Einsatz von Servicerobotern bei Epidemien und Pandemien. HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 14. Oktober 2020 (Open Access). https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/article/10.1365/s40702-020-00669-w. Zugegriffen am 04.03.2021

  • Bendel O, Gasser A, Siebenmann J (2020) Co-robots as care robots. Accepted paper of the AAAI 2020 Spring symposium „applied AI in healthcare: safety, community, and the environment“ (Stanford University). In: ArXiv, 10. April 2020. Cornell University, Ithaca. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04374. Zugegriffen am 04.03.2021

  • Bilyea A, Seth N, Nesathurai S, Abdullah H (2017) Robotic assistants in personal care: a scoping review. Med Eng Phys 49:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks M, Bodak M, Barlas J, Harwood J, Pether M (2016) Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: a qualitative study. J Aging Res 2016:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent E (2017) Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Annu Rev Psychol 68:627–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2010) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 2:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2019) Bevölkerungsentwicklung und Altersstruktur. https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/soziale-situation-in-deutschland/61541/altersstruktur#:~:text=Auch%20die%20Zahl%20der%20Hochaltrigen,9%20auf%206%2C2%20Prozent. Zugegriffen am 08.03.2021

  • Caroni P, Bleuler T, Morgado A (2020) Assistenzroboter Lio – In Zeiten von Pandemien. In: Zerth J, Forster C, Müller S et al (Hrsg) Kann Digital Pflege? 3. Clusterkonferenz „Zukunft der Pflege“, Bd 2. PPZ, Nürnberg, S 73–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Carros F (2019) Roboter in der Pflege, ein Schreckgespenst?. Mensch und Computer 2019 – Workshopband. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. DOI: 10.18420/muc2019-ws-588

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayton H (2005) From childhood to childhood? Autonomy and dependence through the ages of life. In: Hughes J, Louw S, Sabat SR (Hrsg) Dementia: mind, meaning, and the person. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • EUnited Robotics (2020) Good work charter of the European robotics industry. In: EUnited AISBL, Boulevard A (Hrsg) Reyers. Brussels, S 80–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Bobinger S, de Ruiter L, Hegel F (2012) ‚If you sound like me, you must be more human‘: on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), Boston, S 125–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ (2011) Socially assistive robotics. In: IEEE robotics & automation magazine, S 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischinger D, Einramhof P, Papoutsakis K, Wohlkinger W, Mayer P, Panek P, Hofmann S, Koertner T, Weiss A, Argyros A, Vincze M (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Robot Auton Syst 75:60–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Früh M, Gasser A (2018) Erfahrungen aus dem Einsatz von Pflegerobotern für Menschen im Alter. In: Bendel O (Hrsg) Pflegeroboter. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 37–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser A, Steinemann S, Opwies K (2017) A qualitative view on elders interacting with a health care robot with bodily movements. University of Basel, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf B, Hans M, Schraft RD (2004) Care-O-bot II – development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Auton Robot 16:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healthcare. (o. D.) SoftBank robotics. https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/industries/healthcare. Zugegriffen am 05.04.2021

  • Heerink M, Kröse B, Wielinga B, Evers V (2009) Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: celebrating people and technology. Cambridge, S 430–439

    Google Scholar 

  • InGen Dynamics. (o. D.) Meet AIDO. https://www.startengine.com/aido. Zugegriffen am 05.04.2021

  • Kachouie R, Sedighadeli S, Khosla R, Chu M-T (2014) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int J Human Comput Interact 30:369–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast M, Burmester M, Krüger K, Fatikow S, Arbeiter G, Graf B, Kronreif G, Pigini L, Facal D, Qiu R (2012) User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home. J Human Robot Interact 1:96–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (2011) Stress fressen Seele auf. Gesundheit und Gesellschaft: 10. https://www.aok-gesundheitspartner.de/imperia/md/gpp/rh/vigo/pflege/g_g-spezial_11_2011_pflege.pdf. Zugegriffen am 04.03.2021

  • Mišeikis J, Caroni P, Duchamp P, Gasser A, Marko R, Mišeikienė N, Zwilling F, de Castelbajac C, Eicher L, Früh M, Früh H (2020) Lio – a personal robot assistant for human-robot interaction and care applications. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5(4):5339–5346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitzner TL, Chen TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2014) Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. Int J Soc Robot 6:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai T, Hirano S, Nakashima H, Kato Y, Sakaida Y, Guo S, Hosoe S (2010) Development of a nursing-care assistant robot RIBA that can lift a human in its arms. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Taipei International Convention Center, Taipei, S 5996–6001

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaronke I, Oluwaseun O, Rhoda I (2017) State of the art: a study of human-robot interaction in healthcare. Int J Inf Eng Electron Bus 9:43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey AK, Gelin R (2018) A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, S 40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C, Ali S (2018) Views of nurses and other health and social care workers on the use of assistive humanoid and animal-like robots in health and social care: a scoping review. Contemp Nurse 54(4–5):425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, Todorovic M (2019) The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist 59(1):e37–e51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitschek FG, Wagner GG (2020) Akzeptanz von assistiven Robotern im Pflege- und Gesundheitsbereich. Z Gerontol Geriatr 53:637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E (2014) The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Soc Robot 6:575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. 6th international conference on human-robot interaction (Lausanne, Switzerland), S 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoglio AA, Reilly ED, Gorman JA, Drebing CE (2019) Use of social robots in mental health and well-being research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 21(7):e13322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2010) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow R (2002) The march of the robot dogs. Ethics Inf Technol 4:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, Jayawardena C, Wegner DM, Broadbent E (2014) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. J Soc Robot 6(1):17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun N, Yang E, Corney J, Chen Y, Ma Z (2018) A review of high-level robot functionality for elderly care. 2018 24th international conference on automation and computing (ICAC), Newcastle upon Tyne, S 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanioka T (2019) Nursing and rehabilitative care of the elderly using humanoid robots. J Med Invest 66:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker A, Lansley P (2005) Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare 11:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandemeulebroucke T, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Gastmans C (2018) The use of care robots in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 74:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Social effects of robot therapy in a care house – change of social network of the residents for two months. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Rome, S 1250–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, Tanie K (2004) Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proc IEEE 92(11):1780–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada K, Shibata T, Musha T, Kimura S (2005) Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG. 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Edmonton, Alta, S 1552–1557

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenfels M (2016) Pflege 4.0: Die Zukunft der Pflege durch Roboter. ProCare 21:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson J (2015) The strong robot with the gentle touch. https://www.riken.jp/en/news_pubs/research_news/pr/2015/20150223_2/. Zugegriffen am 05.04.2021

  • Wirth L, Siebenmann J, Gasser A (2020) Erfahrungen aus dem Einsatz von Assistenzrobotern für Menschen im Alter. In: Buxbaum H-J (Hrsg) Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, S 257–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. F&P Robotics, Glattbrugg, Schweiz

    Tanja Bleuler & Pietro Caroni

Authors
  1. Tanja Bleuler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pietro Caroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Bleuler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule für Wirtschaft FHNW, Windisch, Schweiz

    Oliver Bendel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bleuler, T., Caroni, P. (2021). Roboter in der Pflege. In: Bendel, O. (eds) Soziale Roboter. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31114-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31113-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31114-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation