Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Erfolgsfaktoren zur zukünftigen Gestaltung resilienter Supply Chains – Konzeption eines Bezugsrahmens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Management Research

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Supply Management ((ASSM))

Zusammenfassung

Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrages ist die Bestimmung von Erfolgsfaktoren und deren Wirkzusammenhängen, die zur zukünftigen Gestaltung resilienter Supply Chains beitragen. Im Rahmen einer systematischen Literaturanalyse wurden auf einer Datenbasis von 180 Publikationen 13 relevante Bezugsrahmen mit direktem Bezug zu insgesamt 34 verschiedenen Einflussfaktoren von Supply-Chain-Resilienz identifiziert. Aufgrund einer fehlenden Standardterminologie und eines mangelnden Verständnisses über Wirkzusammenhänge wird in der Literatur jedoch nicht deutlich, welche Erfolgsfaktoren eine bedeutende Rolle in der Gestaltung resilienter Supply Chains spielen. Mit dem hier entwickelten Bezugsrahmen soll dieses Defizit ausgeglichen werden, indem Erfolgsfaktoren anhand ihrer Wirkungszusammenhänge in einem logischen Ordnungsrahmen abgebildet werden. Durch seine inhaltliche Fülle stellt der konzeptionelle Bezugsrahmen ein provisorisches Erklärungsmodell dar, das als Grundlage für eine weitere empirische Überprüfung dienen kann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Agarwal, A.; Shankar, R.; Tiwari, M. (2007): Modeling agility of supply chain, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, R.; Barabási, A.-L. (2002): Statistical mechanics of complex networks, in: Review of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakshi, N.; Kleindorfer, P. (2008): Co-opetition and Investment for Supply-Chain Resilience, in: Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 583–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M.; Oke, A. (2007): Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: a resource-based theory perspective, in: Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1217–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biedermann, L. (n.V.): Supply Chain Resilienz – Konzeptioneller Bezugsrahmen und Identifikation zukünftiger Erfolgsfaktoren. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, J.; Kaitlin, S.; Graighead, C. (2011): An empirically derived framework of global supply resiliency, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 32(4), 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunscheidel, M.; Suresh, N. (2009): The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response, in: Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusset, X.; Teller, C. (2017): Supply Chain Capabilities, Risks, and Resilience, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 59-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, S.; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.; Relvas, S.; Novais, A. (2014): Resilience assessment of supply chains under different types of disruption, in: J. D. Mario R. Eden (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design – FOCAPD 2014, Cle Elum, Washington, USA: Elsevier B.V., 759–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, H.; Azevedo, S.; Cruz-Machado, V. (2012): Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness, in: Logistics Research, 48(22), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, H.; Duarte, S.; Cruz-Machado, V. (2011): Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies, in: International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(2), 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan, M.; Kotzab, H. (2003): Assessing the responsiveness in the Danish mobile phone supply chain, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(8), 668–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2000): The agile supply chain, competing in volatile markets, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M.; Holweg, M. (2011): “Supply Chain 2.0”: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M.; Peck, H. (2004): Building the resilient supply chain, in: The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M.; Peck, H.; Towill, D. (2006): A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain, in: The International Journal of Logistics Management, 17(2), 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia, C.; Dallari, F.; Melacini, M. (2010): Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context, in: Production Planning & Control: the Management of Operations, 21(7), 680–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, A.; Colbert, B. (2004): Network robustness and graph topology, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC2004), Dunedin, New Zealand, Sydney: Australian Computer Society, 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. (2009): Producing a systematic review, in: Buchanan, D.; Bryman, A.: The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, London: Sage Publications Ltd., 671–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, M.; Banwet, D.; Shankar, R. (2006): Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers, in: Business Process Management, 12(4), 535–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A.; Subramanian, N.; Rahman, S. (2015): Supply chain resilience: role of complexities and strategies, in: International Journal of Production Research, 53(22), 6809–6819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein, N.-O.; Feisel, E.; Hartmann, E.; Giunipero, L. (2015): Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience – a systematic review and paths for further investigation, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 90–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S.; Al Khaled, A.; Sarder, M. (2016): A general framework for assessing system resilience using Bayesian networks: A case study of sulfuric acid manufacturer, in: Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 41, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N.; Elliott, D.; Drake, P. (2013): Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, U.; Maklan, S. (2011): Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalahmadi, M.; Mellat-Parast, M. (2016): A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 117, 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.; Chen, Y.-S.; Linderman, K. (2015): Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective, in: Journal of Operations Management, 33(34), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P.; Saad, G. (2005): Managing disruption risks in supply chains, in: Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, M. (2011): Strategisches Entscheiden in Unternehmen, Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, X.-Y.; Li, X.-Y. (2008): Creating the Resilient Supply Chain: The Role of Knowledge Management Resources. 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM), Dalian, China: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, H. (1977): Heuristische Bezugsrahmen und heuristisch angelegte Forschungsdesigns als Elemente einer Konstruktionsstrategie empirischer Forschung, in: Köhler, R.: Empirische und handlungstheoretische Forschungskonzeptionen in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Bericht über die Tagung in Aachen, März 1976, Stuttgart: Poeschel Verlag, 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubicek, H. (1979): Informationstechnologie und Organisationsforschung – eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme der Forschungsergebnisse, in: Hansen, H.; Schröder, K.; Weihe, H.: Mensch und Computer, München, Wien: Oldenbourg Verlag, 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2004): The triple-A supply chain, in: Harvard Business Review, 2–12. Verfügbar unter: https://hbr.org/2004/10/the-triple-a-supply-chain (abgerufen am 27. Oktober 2016).

  • Li, X.; Chung, C.; Goldsby, T.; Holsapple, C. (2008): A unified model of supply chain agility: the work-design perspective, in: The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(3), 408–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. R. (2008): Supply Chain Disruption Management: A Conceptual Framework and Theoretical Model, College Park, Maryland (USA): Graduate School of the University of Maryland. Verfügbar unter: http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/8803/umi-umd-5824.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  • Mandal, S. (2012): An empirical investigation into supply chain resilience, in: IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, S.; Sarathy, R.; Rao Korasiga, V.; Bhattacharya, S.; Ghosh Dastidar, S. (2016): Achieving supply chain resilience: The contribution of logistics and supply chain capabilities, in: International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(5), 544–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R.; Glassman, M.; Honeycutt, E. J. (2002): The effects of culture and human resource management policies on supply chain management, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meepetchdee, Y.; Shah, N. (2007): Logistical network design with robustness and complexity considerations, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(2), 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, R.; Torstensson, H.; Mattila, H. (2014): Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises – an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 410–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, H. (2005): Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: an integrated framework, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(4), 210–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, C. R.; Christopher, M.; Da Silva, A. L. (2014): Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurement, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 626–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, T. J.; Fiksel, J.; Croxton, K. L. (2010): Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience: Development of a Conceptual Framework, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnambalam, L.; Long, D.; Sarawgi, D.; Fu, X.; Goh, R. S. (2014): Multi-Agent Models to Study the Robustness and Resilience of Complex Supply Chain Networks, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Agents, Networks and Systems, Bandung, Indonesia: IEEE, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponomarov, S. (2012): Antecedents and Consequences of Supply Chain Resilience: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective, Dissertation at University of Tennessee. Verfügbar unter: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1338 (abgerufen am 8. August 2015).

  • Ponomarov, S.; Holcomb, M. (2009): Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience, in: The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, L.; Spall, S.; Naim, M.; Spiegler, V. (2016): Developing a resilient supply chain strategy during ‘boom’ and ‘bust’, in: Production Planning & Control, 27(7–8), 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R.; Ravi, V. (2015): Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, R. (2002): Performance measurement of supply chain management, in: DILF Orientering, 39(2), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichhart, A.; Holweg, M. (2007): Creating the customer-responsive supply chain: a reconciliation of concepts, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(11), 1144–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.; Caniato, F. (2003): Building a secure and resilient supply network, in: Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghafian, S.; Oyen, M. van (2012): The value of flexible backup suppliers and disruption risk information: newsvendor analysis with recourse, in: IIE Transactions, 44, 834–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, A. K.; Datta, S.; Mahapatra, S. (2016): Evaluation and selection of resilient suppliers in fuzzy environment: Exploration of fuzzy-VIKOR, in: Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(3), 651–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherm, E. (1999): Internationales Personalmanagement, Berlin: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, K.; Schilder, S. (2015): The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, K.; Sharkey, P.; Fynes, S. B. (2014): Mitigation processes – antecedents for building supply chain resilience, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y. (2005): The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage (Bd. 2), Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT University Press Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi, Y.; Rice, J. (2005): A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise, in: MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, U.; Jain, V. (2011): Minimizing the vulnerabilities of supply chain: a new framework for enhancing the resilience, in: Proceeding of the 2011 IEEE (IEEM), Singapur, 933–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, U.; Jain, V.; Kumar, S. (2014): Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach, in: Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M.; Spring, M. (2007): Flexibility from a supply chain perspective: definition and review, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G.; Kolluru, R.; Smith, M. (2009): Leveraging public-private partnerships to improve community resilience in times of disaster, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39(5), 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P.; Gosh, S.; Murthy, N. (2006): The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing, in: Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.; Kannan, K.; Handfield, R. (1998): Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance, in: International Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 34(3), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. (2006): Perspectives in supply chain risk management, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.; Tomlin, B. (2008): The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun, J.-H.; Hoenig, D. (2011): An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlajic, J.; Vorst, J. van der; Haijema, R. (2012): A framework for designing robust food supply chains, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.; Jie, F.; Abareshi, A. (2015): Evaluating logistics capability for mitigation of supply chain uncertainty and risk in the Australian courier firms, in: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(3), 486–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wannenwetsch, H. (2005): Vernetztes Supply Chain Management, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H. L.; Wang, E. T. (2010). The strategic value of supply chain visibility: increasing the ability to reconfigure, in: European Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welge, M. (1980): Management in deutschen multinationalen Unternehmungen: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, A. (2013): Selecting the right Supply Chain based on risks, in: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(5), 652–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, A.; Wallenburg, C. (2013): The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(4), 300–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, R. (2013): Supply chain temple of resilience, in: Logistics and Transportation Focus, 15(11), 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B.; Yang, Y. (2010). Postponement in supply chain risk management: a complexity perspective, in: International Journal of Production Research, 48(7), 1901–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Logistikmanagement, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Deutschland

    Lukas Biedermann & Herbert Kotzab

Authors
  1. Lukas Biedermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herbert Kotzab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Christoph Bode

  2. Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Ronald Bogaschewsky

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany

    Michael Eßig

  4. Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden, Germany

    Rainer Lasch

  5. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Wolfgang Stölzle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biedermann, L., Kotzab, H. (2019). Erfolgsfaktoren zur zukünftigen Gestaltung resilienter Supply Chains – Konzeption eines Bezugsrahmens. In: Bode, C., Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23818-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23818-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23817-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23818-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation