Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Effekte von aktivierenden Lernumgebungen: Wie Simulationen affektives Lernen fördern

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Europa spielerisch erlernen

Part of the book series: Politische Bildung ((POLBIL))

Zusammenfassung

Simulationen haben sich zu einem populären Lehrwerkzeug in den Politikwissenschaften und den Lehrplänen von EU-Studien entwickelt. Befürworter weisen vor allem darauf hin, dass Simulationen im Einklang mit konstruktivistischen Lerntheorien stehen. Ihr Hauptargument ist: Studierende werden Entscheidungsprozesse der EU besser verstehen wenn sie ihr theoretisches Wissen über Verhandlungstheorie mit ihrem Wissen über die Funktionsweisen der EU und den Erfahrungen des Verhandelns in der Simulation kombinieren. Dieser Beitrag hat zum Ziel, diese pädagogischen Annahmen zu diskutieren. Empirische Referenz ist dabei EuroSim, eine Simulation von EU-Entscheidungsprozessen des transatlantischen Konsortiums für EU-Studien & Simulationen (TACEUSS). Zusätzlich diskutiert der Beitrag, durch Nutzen von Daten aus Umfragen unter Teilnehmern vor und nach der Simulation, wie Studierende von der Teilnahme an Simulationen im dem Bereich affektives Lernen profitierten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Für weitere Informationen zu TACEUSS und EuroSim, siehe http://www.eusimulations.org/.

Literatur

  • Asal, V. & Kratoville, J. (2013) ‘Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the Pedagogy of IR Simulations Through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens’, Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. & Tagg, J. (1995) ‘From teaching to learning – A new paradigm for undergraduate education’, Change 27(6): 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum, M. (2003) ‘New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment’ in F. Dochy, E. Cascalar and M. Segers (eds.) Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search for qualities and standards, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (1989) ‘Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis’, Review of Educational Research 59(4): 395–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. W. & King, F. B. (2000) ‘Constructivist pedagogy and how we learn: Educational psychology meets international study’, International Studies Perspectives 1(3): 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunazzo, M. & Settembri, P. (2014) ‘Experiencing the European Union: A simulation game on the European Citizens’ Initiative’, online http://www.sisp.it/files/papers/2013/marco-brunazzo-and-pierpaolo-settembri-1500.pdf [22.08.2017].

  • Chin, J., Dukes, R. & W. Gamson (2009) ‘Assessment in Simulation and Gaming. A Review of the Last 40 Years’, Simulation and Gaming 40(4): 553–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E. (2000) ‘Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology’, Learning and Instruction 10(3): 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, B. K. (2003) ‘Byzantine politics: Using simulations to make sense of the middle east’, Political Science and Politics 36(2): 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., & Ebner, N. (2013) ‘Games, claims, and new frames: Rethinking the use of simulation in negotiation education’, Negotiation Journal, 29(1): 61–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, A. (2013) ‘Simulating the European Union: Reflections on Module Design’. International Studies Perspectives 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonti, F. & Stevancevic, G. (2014) ‘Innovativeness in Teaching European Studies: an Empirical Investigation’, in Baroncelli, S. et al. (Hrsg.) Teaching and Learning the European Union. Traditional and Innovative Methods: 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatas, S.E. (2006) ‘A Simulation of the Council of the European Union: Assessment of the Impact on Student Learning’, PSonline January: 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanello, S. P., Kirk, J. A., & M. K. Kromer (2013) ‘Student Perceptions of a Role-Playing Simulation in an Introductory International Relations Course’, Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosen, J. and Washbush, J. (2004) ‘A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness’, Simulation and Gaming 35(2): 270–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblat, C. S. (1973) ‘Teaching with simulation games: A review of claims and evidence’, Teaching Sociology 1(1): 62–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, C., Duke, Richard, D. (ed) (1975). Gaming Simulations: Rationale, Design, and Applications, New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti P., Muno W. & Niemann A. (2015) ‘Introduction – EU Simulations as a Multi-dimensional Resource: From Teaching and Learning Tool to Research Instrument’ European Political Science 14(3): 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.J., de Caluwé, L. & V. Peters (2010) ‘Why Simulation Game Works – in Search of the Active Substance: a Synthesis’, Simulation and Gaming 41(6): 824–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiyama, J. (2012) ‘Frequently Used Active Learning Techniques and their Impact: A Critical Review of Existing Journal Literature in the United States’, European Political Science 11(1): 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2008). ‘Evaluating a Cross-Continent EU Simulation’, Journal of Political Science Education 4(4): 404–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. & Bursens P. (2013) ‘Assessing EU Simulations: Evidence from the Trans-Atlantic EuroSim’, in: S. Baroncelli, R. Farnelli, I. Horga and S. Vanhoonacker (eds.) Teaching and Learning the European Union, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunert, C. (2009) ‘The European Union Simulation: from Problem Based Learning (PBL) to Student Interest’, European Political Science 8(3): 254–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muno, W., Messner, M.T. & Hahner, N. (2013) ‘Politikdidaktik and Simulationen: Die EU Simulation Model European Union Mainz’ Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 23(1): 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muno, W., Niemann, A. & Guasti, P. (2017): EU-Simulationen als multidimensionaler didaktischer Ansatz, in diesem Band.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. (2012) ‘Missing the Trees for the Forest? Learning Environments versus Learning Techniques in Simulations’, Journal of Political Science Education 8(1): 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. & Usherwood, S (2013) ‘Assessment in Simulations’, Journal of Political Science Education, 9(2): 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rünz, P. (2013) ‘Making European Citizens? How Participation in Model EU Simulations Influences European Identity and Support of the EU.’ EU Simulations: Scholarly reflection and Research on Innovative Teaching Methodology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 27–28 September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr, M., De Santo, E., & Green, A. (2014) ‘What do students learn from a role-play simulation of an international negotiation?’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(3): 401–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellman, S. M. & Kürşad, T. (2001) ‘Active Learning in Comparative Politics: A Mock German Election and Coalition-Formation Simulation’, PS: Political Science & Politics 34(4): 827–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellman, S. M. & Kürşad, T. (2006) ‘Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation’, Journal of Political Science Education 2(1): 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, K. (2003) ‘Ropes, poles and space. Active learning in business education’, Active Learning in Higher Education 4(2): 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Schelfhout, W. & Gielen, S. (2006). ‘On the dynamics of students‘ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment’, Learning and Instruction 16(4): 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szafran, R. F. & Mandolini, A. F. (1980) ‘Student evaluations of a simulation game’, Teaching Sociology 8(1): 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. (1998) ‘Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities’, Review of Educational Research 68(3): 249–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usherwood, S. (2014) ‘Constructing Effective Simulations of the European Union for Teaching: Realising the Potenial’, European Political Science 13(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J., & Lodewijks, H. (2002) ‘Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures’ Learning and Instruction 12(3): 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chester, USA

    Rebecca Jones

  2. Antwerpen, Belgien

    Peter Bursens

Authors
  1. Rebecca Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Bursens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Mainz , Mainz, Germany

    Wolfgang Muno

  2. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Arne Niemann

  3. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Petra Guasti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, R., Bursens, P. (2018). Die Effekte von aktivierenden Lernumgebungen: Wie Simulationen affektives Lernen fördern. In: Muno, W., Niemann, A., Guasti, P. (eds) Europa spielerisch erlernen. Politische Bildung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17463-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17463-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17462-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17463-7

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation