Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Auch eine Frage der Persönlichkeit? Der Einfluss von CEO-Charakteristika auf Führungs- und Steuerungssysteme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Langfristige Perspektiven und Nachhaltigkeit in der Rechnungslegung

  • 8173 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An dieser Stelle wird keine Annahme darüber getroffen, ob die Persönlichkeitseigenschaften des CEO eine Auswirkung auf den Unternehmenserfolg haben. Im Sinne der attribution theory entsteht ein Einfluss von CEOs auf den Unternehmenserfolg lediglich durch die Zuschreibung durch Mitarbeiter (Calder 1977; Pfeffer 1981). Der Einfluss von CEOs auf den Unternehmenserfolg ist auch aus empirischer Sicht umstritten (Fitza 2014, 2016; Quigley und Hambrick 2015).

  2. 2.

    Auf alternative Mehrfaktorenmodelle wie Big‐6 (Thalmayer et al. 2011; Thalmayer und Saucier 2014) wird hier aus Platzgründen nicht näher eingegangen.

Literatur

  • Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & van Lent, L. (2010). Leadership and control system design. Management Accounting Research, 21, 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy, M. A., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. (2014). The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review, 90, 1265–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenburger, O. A. (1975). Entscheidungsorientierte Kostenrechnung im Versicherungsbetrieb. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 64, 441–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburger, O. A. (1995a). Kostenartenrechnung und Unsicherheit. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 65, 729–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburger, O. A. (1995b). Rechnungslegung und Unsicherheit. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburger, O. A. (2015). Versicherungsrechnungslegung nach IFRS – Bringt der Exposure Draft 2013 eine Verbesserung? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 104, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2014). Management control systems: European edition. Berkshire: Mcgraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Rau, P. R. (2017). What doesn’t kill you will only make you more risk-loving: early-life disasters and CEO behavior. The Journal of Finance, 72, 167–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 615–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1169–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J., & Shields, M. (2007). Psychology theory in management accounting research. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood & M. D. Shields (Hrsg.), Handbook of management accounting research (S. 113–135). Kidlington Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2011). Me or we: the effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 551–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI). Manual, Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Sarma, N. (2007). CEO overconfidence, CEO dominance and corporate acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business, 59, 358–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkert, M., & Lueg, R. (2013). Differences in the sophistication of value-based management – the role of top executives. Management Accounting Research, 24, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salacik (Hrsg.), New directions in organizational behavior (S. 179–204). Clarkston: St. Clair Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., & Golden, B. R. (1997). Perceived managerial discretion: a study of cause and effect. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). It’s all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 351–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: the influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 767–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 797–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review, 5, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and Meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Essen, M., Otten, J., & Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: a meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41, 164–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1989). Chief executive compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitza, M. A. (2014). The use of variance decomposition in the investigation of CEO effects: how large must the CEO effect be to rule out chance? Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1839–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitza, M. A. (2016). How much do CEOs really matter? Reaffirming that the CEO effect is mostly due to chance. Strategic Management Journal Forthcoming. doi:10.1002/smj.2597.

  • Foster, J. D., Shenesey, J. W., & Goff, J. S. (2009). Why do narcissists take more risks? Testing the roles of perceived risks and benefits of risky behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 885–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galasso, A., & Simcoe, T. S. (2011). CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science, 57, 1469–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40, 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdin, J., & Greve, J. (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research – a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, N., & Speckbacher, G. (2017). Everything under my control: CEO characteristics and the evaluation of middle manager performance in small and medium-sized firms. Schmalenbach Business Review. doi:10.1007/s41464-017-0027-x.

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: an update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Abrahamson, E. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: a multimethod approach. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1427–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, P., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Managing strategic change: the duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1318–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebl, M. R. W. (2014). Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research. Journal of Management Control, 24, 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebl, M. R. W., Duller, C., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Ulrich, P. (2015). Family influence and management accounting usage – findings from Germany and Austria. Schmalenbach Business Review, 3, 368–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: the role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: a psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and individual Differences, 40, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P., & Beaver, G. (1997). The performance and competitive advantage of small firms: a management perspective. International Small Business Journal, 15, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. A. (2000). Predicting observers’ ratings of the Big Five from the CPI, HPI, and NEO-PI-R: a comparative validity study. European Journal of Personality, 14, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: the good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. (1984). Neurotic style and organizational pathology. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. (1985). Narcissism and leadership: an object relations perspective. Human Relations, 38, 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakey, C. E., Rose, P., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2008). Probing the link between narcissism and gambling: the mediating role of judgment and decision-making biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, R. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavia López, O., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2014). Management accounting in small and medium-sized enterprises: current knowledge and avenues for further research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27, 81–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. Y., & Stephens, C. U. (1994). CEO attitudes as determinants of organization design: an integrated model. Organization Studies, 15, 183–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubit, R. (2002). The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 16, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60, 2661–2700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A., & Otley, D. T. (2006). A review of the literature on control and accountability. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood & M. D. Shields (Hrsg.), Handbooks of management accounting research (S. 785–802). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A., & van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3. Aufl.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Dröge, C. (1986). Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 539–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Toulouse, J.-M. (1986). Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms. Management Science, 32, 1389–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Toulouse, J.-M. (1982). Top executive locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar, V. (2002). Delegation and incentive compensation. The Accounting Review, 77, 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007). Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 735–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noftle, E. E., & Fleeson, W. (2010). Age differences in big five behavior averages and variabilities across the adult life span: moving beyond retrospective, global summary accounts of personality. Psychology and Aging, 25, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, M.-J., Elosge, C., & Elosge, L. (2016). Me, myself and I: the role of CEO narcissism in internationalization decisions. International Business Review, 25, 1114–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. J., Dworkis, K. K., & Young, S. M. (2014). CEO narcissism and accounting: a picture of profits. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R). Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2014). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1528–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (1997). Personality: theory and research (7. Aufl.). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2015). Has the „CEO effect“ increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reina, C. S., Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S. J. (2014). CEO grandiose narcissism and firm performance: the role of organizational identification. The leadership quarterly, 25, 958–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1986). Inertia, environments, and strategic choice: a quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research. Management Science, 32, 608–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G. W. M., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Swinging for the fences: the effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1055–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarges, W., & Wottawa, H. (2001). Handbuch wirtschaftspsychologischer Testverfahren. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, U., & Dossi, A. (2014). Top management impact on management control. Journal of Management Control, 24, 219–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. L. C. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Social and personality development (4. Aufl.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speckbacher, G. (2017). Was ist eine gute Führungskraft? In S. Kalss, S. Frotz & P. Schörghofer (Hrsg.), Handbuch für den Vorstand (S. 47–54). Wien: Facultas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speckbacher, G., & Wentges, P. (2012). The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: a research note. Management Accounting Research, 23, 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1990). Corporate rejuvenation. Journal of Management Studies, 27, 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thalmayer, A. G., & Saucier, G. (2014). The questionnaire big six in 26 nations: developing cross-culturally applicable big six, big five and big two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28, 482–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., & Eigenhuis, A. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length big five and big six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Zhang, Z.-X., & Wang, H. (2006). Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., Virany, B., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Executive succession, strategic reorientations, and organization evolution. Technology in Society, 7, 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Holmes, R. M., Oh, I.-S., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69, 775–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Institut für Unternehmensführung, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Wien, Österreich

    Ass.Prof. Mag.Dr.rer.soc.oec. Otto Janschek & o. Univ.-Prof. Dipl. Math. oec. Dr. Gerhard Speckbacher

Authors
  1. Ass.Prof. Mag.Dr.rer.soc.oec. Otto Janschek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. o. Univ.-Prof. Dipl. Math. oec. Dr. Gerhard Speckbacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut f. BWL, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Udo Wagner

  2. Universität Wien , Wien, Austria

    Michaela-Maria Schaffhauser-Linzatti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janschek, O., Speckbacher, G. (2017). Auch eine Frage der Persönlichkeit? Der Einfluss von CEO-Charakteristika auf Führungs- und Steuerungssysteme. In: Wagner, U., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, MM. (eds) Langfristige Perspektiven und Nachhaltigkeit in der Rechnungslegung . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14877-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14877-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14876-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14877-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation