Skip to main content

Arbeitsgestaltung und Kreativität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kreativität, Innovation, Entrepreneurship

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel beschäftigt sich mit dem Zusammenhang von Arbeitsgestaltung und Kreativität. Es werden drei grundlegende Theorien zur Arbeitsgestaltung erläutert. Darüber hinaus stellen wir dar, inwiefern die Arbeitsmerkmale Autonomie/Handlungsspielraum, Arbeitskomplexität, Stressoren und soziale Merkmalen im Zusammenhang mit Kreativität stehen. Ferner werden fünf Prozesse beleuchtet, über die Arbeitsgestaltung sich auf Kreativität auswirkt. Ergebnisse in Bezug auf intrinsische Motivation als vermittelnde Variable werden ebenso dargestellt wie empirische Befunde zu Kreativitätsanforderungen, positiven Emotionen, kreativer Selbstwirksamkeit und Wissen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (Hrsg) Research in organizational behavior, Bd 10. JAI Press, Greenwich, S 123–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in the context. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA, Tighe EM (1994) The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J Pers Soc Psychol 66(5):950–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39:1154–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Mueller JS, Simpson WB, Hadley CN, Kramer SJ, Fleming L (2003) Time pressure and creativity in organizations: a longitudinal field study. Harvard Business School Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin Sci Q 50:367–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2008) A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol Bull 134:779–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer M, Oldham GR (2006) The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of support, support for creativity and openness to experience. J Appl Psychol 91:963–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann B, Debitz U, Hacker W, Looks P, Prescher C, Winkelmann C (2007) Unterstützung innovierenden Handelns als strategische Unternehmensaufgabe. Kompetenzkapital heute–Wege zum integrierten Kompetenzmanagement. School Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, S 31–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli A, Schaubroeck J (2007) The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. Leadership Quart 18(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, Boudreau JW (2000) An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J Appl Psychol 85:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg CW (2000) Sociotechnical principles for system design. Appl Ergon 31(5):463–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels K, Wimalasiri V, Cheyne A, Story V (2011) Linking the demands–control–support model to innovation: the moderating role of personal initiative on the generation and implementation of ideas. J Occup Organ Psychol 84(3):581–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu CK (2002) Team innovation and team effectiveness: the importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 11(3):285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder P, Sawyer JE (2007) A meta-analytic examination of employee creativity. Vortag gehalten auf der 22. SIOP Konferenz, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach KD, Hargadon AB (2006) Enhancing creativity through „mindless“ work: a framework of workday design. Organ Sci 17:470–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach KD, Pratt MG (2007) The physical environment in organizations. Acad Manag Ann 1(1):181–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay D, Sonnentag S (2002) Rethinking the effects of stressors: a longitudinal study on personal initiative. J Occup Health Psychol 7:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1985) If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J Pers Soc Psychol 48:150–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson BL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 56(3):218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese M, Garst H, Fay D (2007) Making things happen: reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative (PI) in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. J Appl Psychol 92:1084–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K (2006) Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav 27:1089–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav 26:331–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson LL, Shalley CE (2004) A little creativity goes a long way: an examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. J Manag 30:435–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist ME, Mitchell TR (1992) Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manag Rev 17:183–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong Y, Huang J-C, Farh J-L (2009) Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: the mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Acad Manag J 52:765–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of inventions: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad Manag J 54:73–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Fried Y, Juillerat T (2010) Work matters: job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. In: Zedeck S (Hrsg) APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Bd 1. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, S 417–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK (2007) A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad Manag J 50:327–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W (1998) Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie [General work psychology]. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker W (2005) Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie, 2. Aufl. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(2):250–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work redesign. Oregon State Library, Salem

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond MM, Neff NL, Farr JL, Schwall AR, Zhao X (2011) Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 5:90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger U, Anderson N, Salgado JF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol 94:1128–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J (2009) A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Acad Manag J 52(2):280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol 92:1332–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PR, Wall TD, Martin R, Davids K (1993) New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. J Appl Psychol 78:753–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad Manag J 44:1039–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek R (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q 24:285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: „seizing“ and „freezing“. Psychol Rev 103(2):263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach DJ, Wall TD, Jackson PR (2003) The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: an empirical test involving operators of complex technology. J Occup Organ Psychol 76(1):27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine JA, Podsakoff NP, LePine MA (2005) A meta-analytic test of the challenge stress-hindrance stress framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships between stressors and performance. Acad Manag J 48:764–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar N (2008) Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity. J Occup Organ Psychol 81:83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar N, Oldham GR, Pratt MG (2002) There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees′ creative performance. Acad Manag J 45:757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen GE, Einarsen S (2004) A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativ Res J 16:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FP, Campion MA (2003) Work design. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR, Klimoski R (Hrsg.) Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology, Bd 12. Wiley, Hoboken, S 423–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson FP, Delaney-Klinger K, Hemingway MA (2005) The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. J Appl Psychol 90(2):399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison EW, Phelps CC (1999) Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manag J 42:403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly S (2011) Ideen entwickeln und Verbesserungsvorschläge einreichen: Alles eine Frage der intrinsischen Motivation? Paper presented at the 7. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations, und Wirtschaftspsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Rostock

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohly S, Fritz C (2010) Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity and proactive behavior: a multi-level study. J Organ Behav 31:543–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly S, Kleespies N (2009, September) Zeitdruck, illegitime Arbeitsaufgaben und Arbeitsengagement: unter Umständen optimal aktiviert? Paper presented at the 6. Tagung der Fachgruppe Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Pluntke F (2006) Routinization, work characteristics, and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. J Organ Behav 27:257–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham GR, Hackman JR (2010) Not what it was and not what it will be: the future of job design research. J Organ Behav 31(2–3):463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Ohly S (2008) Job design and work role demands. In: Kanfer R, Chen G, Pritchard R (Hrgs) Work motivation: past, present, and future. SIOP Frontiers Series. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, S. 233–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Sprigg CA (1999) Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: the role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. J Appl Psychol 84:925–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Wall TD, Cordery JL (2001) Future work design research and practice: towards an elaborated model of work design. J Occup Organ Psychol 74(4):413–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SK, Turner N, Williams HM (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. J Appl Psychol 636–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad Manag Rev 28:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff NP, LePine JA, LePine MA (2007) Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 92:438–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy N, Flood PC, Slattery T, Sardessai R (2005) Determinants of innovative work behaviour: development and test of an integrated model. Creativ Innovat Manag 14:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg FU, Vollmeyer R, Burns BD (2001) FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. [A questionnaire to assess current motivation in learning situations]. Diagnostica 47:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos PA, Treiman DJ (1980) Worker functions and worker traits for the 1970 U.S. census classification. In: Miller AR, Treiman DJ, Cain PS, Roos PA (Hrsg) Work, jobs, and occupations: a critical analysis of the dictionary of occupational titles. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, S 336–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MR, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra R, Kwun SK (2000) Affective states in job characteristics theory. J Organ Behav 21:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC (2000) Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Acad Manag J 43:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE, Oldham GR, Porac JF (1987) Effects of goal difficulty, goal-setting method, and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Acad Manag J 30(3):553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from here? J Manag 30:933–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag S, Frese M (2003) Stress in organizations. In: Borman WC, Ilgen DR (Hrsg) Handbook of psychology: industrial and organizational psychology, Bd 12. Wiley, New York, S 453–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FW (1923) The principles of scientific management. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney P, Farmer SM (2002) Creative self-efficacy: it potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad Manag J 45:1137–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB (1999) An examination of leadership and employee creativity: the relevance of traits and relationships. Pers Psychol 52:591–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • To ML, Fisher CD, Ashkanasy NM, Rowe PA (2012) Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. J Appl Psychol 97:599–612. doi:10.1037/a0026097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulich E (2001) Arbeitspsychologie, 5. Aufl. Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth KL (2001) Unpacking creativity. Acad Manag Rev 26:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbach T, Fay D, Goral A (2010) Extending the job design perspective on individual innovation: exploring the effect of group reflexivity. J Occup Organ Psychol 83:1053–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr P (1994) A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work Stress 8(2):84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J (1998) Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. J Appl Psychol 83:261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Ohly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ohly, S., Plückthun, L. (2013). Arbeitsgestaltung und Kreativität. In: Krause, D. (eds) Kreativität, Innovation, Entrepreneurship. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02551-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02551-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02550-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02551-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics